Re: Proposed suite: developer tools
I might be stupid but Vermine reversed would be enimrev? Heh. No. What you say is not stupid :-) What I reversed is not the string of characters, but the string of syllables (or phonemes, if you prefer). I agree Syllables are hard to define because their definition is at least language specific. But well, this is also part of the beauty of human languages. It's impressive to see how various the kinds of discussions on desktop-devel-list can be. Cheers, Dodji. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Proposed suite: developer tools
Le mercredi 10 janvier 2007, à 12:56, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit : So for my part - I think holding back might send a message that this thing is bigger and scarier than it really is (or should be), which is just better coordination among related projects and better visibility of stable releases and schedules. On the other hand, if we hold back and have more modules for 2.20 than for 2.18, this might make more noise and attract more people :-) Should we consider this kind of marketing arguments? (Oh, and I like the idea, and I want such a suite. I've no strong opinion on whether we should do it now or wait a cycle to have more tools) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Proposed suite: developer tools
On 1/8/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a thread about the whole suite. This is not about glade3, or anjuta, or monodevelop, or devhelp. The question is: is this suite a good idea or a bad idea? As with the others, I like the idea in general. Another question: Should we hold it up to the same standards as e.g. the bindings suite? The bindings suite ran unofficially and in parallel for one cycle to give everyone on both sides a chance to see if deadlines and release rules could be met without undue difficulty or pain. Do we want to do something similar with the developer tools suite? Elijah ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Proposed suite: developer tools
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 19:03 +, Ross Burton wrote: It's an excellent idea. Agree, there's no point having just blessed applications when you don't know how to start creating them using blessed tools. Richard. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Proposed suite: developer tools
8 jan 2007 kl. 20.03 skrev Ross Burton: On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 19:35 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: This is a thread about the whole suite. This is not about glade3, or anjuta, or monodevelop, or devhelp. The question is: is this suite a good idea or a bad idea? It's an excellent idea. Indeed, I think it would make a lot of sense. Cheers, Mikael Hallendal -- Imendio AB, http://www.imendio.com ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
