Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2020-09-14 Thread Olav Vitters

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 11:14:15PM +0100, Kevin Degeling wrote:

ps. First time ever on a mailing list, so please let me know if I'm way
to formal or if I make a very Dutch impression.


As far as I know, there's nothing wrong with making a very Dutch 
impression!


--
Regards,
Olav
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2020-09-10 Thread Link Dupont
Good point. I'll see about making a release tarball for it. I'd be 
happy to maintain the flathub repository too, yea.


On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 1:05 pm, Bastien Nocera  
wrote:

On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 20:48 -0500, Link Dupont wrote:

 I completely agree with these sentiments. It's a valuable piece of
 software that should not be abandoned. I volunteer to take on
 maintainership of it. I've never been a module owner, but this
 sounds
 like a great opportunity to become one.


The upcoming 3.38 release would be a great time to release Dave
Meikle's work on removing the use of the app menu :)

I've also submitted sound-juicer to be added to Flathub so let me know
if you want maintainership there as well:
https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/1806

Cheers




___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2020-09-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 20:48 -0500, Link Dupont wrote:
> I completely agree with these sentiments. It's a valuable piece of 
> software that should not be abandoned. I volunteer to take on 
> maintainership of it. I've never been a module owner, but this
> sounds 
> like a great opportunity to become one.

The upcoming 3.38 release would be a great time to release Dave
Meikle's work on removing the use of the app menu :)

I've also submitted sound-juicer to be added to Flathub so let me know
if you want maintainership there as well:
https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/1806

Cheers

___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-04 Thread Michael Catanzaro

Thanks, Link!

I see you already have GNOME developer access, so you can go ahead and 
add yourself to the doap file. I agree with Bastien that setting up CI 
should be priority #1.


Michael


___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 20:48 -0500, Link Dupont wrote:
> I completely agree with these sentiments. It's a valuable piece of 
> software that should not be abandoned. I volunteer to take on 
> maintainership of it. I've never been a module owner, but this
> sounds 
> like a great opportunity to become one.

A great way to start would be to provide an MR that would generate a
Flatpak through the CI.

Cheers

___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 23:14 +0100, Kevin Degeling wrote:
> Hey All,
> 
> After reporting an issue related to Sound Juicer, I discovered that
> the project has been mostly abandoned. There is still a valuable pull
> request open (
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sound-juicer/merge_requests/2) but for
> the most part active maintainance has stopped. This puts the
> application on a crossroads:
> 
> - Approve pending pull requests and assign a new owner, if only for
> minimal maintainance.
> - End of Life the project, and inform all downstream projects
> (Fedora, Ubuntu et al) te remove it from their repositories in future
> releases.

Option 3 would be "just leave it there".

There are plenty of applications that don't need any sort of
maintenance. In this case it would have been nice if the UI changes
were made earlier, but it hasn't made the application unusable, even
without the patches.

I've reviewed the last patch.

Cheers

___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-03 Thread Link Dupont
I completely agree with these sentiments. It's a valuable piece of 
software that should not be abandoned. I volunteer to take on 
maintainership of it. I've never been a module owner, but this sounds 
like a great opportunity to become one.


Link

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 12:09 am, Luis Menina  
wrote:

Le 03/12/2019 à 23:52, Raphaël Jacquot a écrit :
Le 03/12/2019 à 23:28, Sasa Ostrouska via desktop-devel-list a 
écrit :
Hi, yeah I think that the problem today is that cd rip and burning 
for
music is a bit outdated, probably would be better to transform it 
to a

phone transfer
music app or a burning to USB one. YOu know what I mean, but surely
its a nice app, I used it in the past quite some.



I do still use this app for it's intended purpose, as I have tons of
friends with CDs full of classical music that they want ripped.


Totally agree. Especially when you want your music encoded with 
Vorbis or FLAC codecs, you have to rip from a CD as most often (but 
haven't checked in a while) lossless formats are not available when 
buying music online. I usually just buy second hand CDs on flea 
markets and rip them. It's 2019 and sound-juicer still makes sense. 
Last time I used it was 1 or 2 years ago though, when my hard drive 
crashed (had no backups of that one) and I had to re-rip my whole 
collection.

___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list



___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-03 Thread Luis Menina

Le 03/12/2019 à 23:52, Raphaël Jacquot a écrit :

Le 03/12/2019 à 23:28, Sasa Ostrouska via desktop-devel-list a écrit :

Hi, yeah I think that the problem today is that cd rip and burning for
music is a bit outdated, probably would be better to transform it to a
phone transfer
music app or a burning to USB one. YOu know what I mean, but surely
its a nice app, I used it in the past quite some.



I do still use this app for it's intended purpose, as I have tons of
friends with CDs full of classical music that they want ripped.


Totally agree. Especially when you want your music encoded with Vorbis 
or FLAC codecs, you have to rip from a CD as most often (but haven't 
checked in a while) lossless formats are not available when buying music 
online. I usually just buy second hand CDs on flea markets and rip them. 
It's 2019 and sound-juicer still makes sense. Last time I used it was 1 
or 2 years ago though, when my hard drive crashed (had no backups of 
that one) and I had to re-rip my whole collection.

___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-03 Thread Raphaël Jacquot


Le 03/12/2019 à 23:28, Sasa Ostrouska via desktop-devel-list a écrit :

> Hi, yeah I think that the problem today is that cd rip and burning for
> music is a bit outdated, probably would be better to transform it to a
> phone transfer
> music app or a burning to USB one. YOu know what I mean, but surely
> its a nice app, I used it in the past quite some.
> 

I do still use this app for it's intended purpose, as I have tons of
friends with CDs full of classical music that they want ripped.

Regards

Raphaël
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-03 Thread Sasa Ostrouska via desktop-devel-list
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:14 PM Kevin Degeling  wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> After reporting an issue related to Sound Juicer, I discovered that the 
> project has been mostly abandoned. There is still a valuable pull request 
> open (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sound-juicer/merge_requests/2) but for 
> the most part active maintainance has stopped. This puts the application on a 
> crossroads:
>
> - Approve pending pull requests and assign a new owner, if only for minimal 
> maintainance.
> - End of Life the project, and inform all downstream projects (Fedora, Ubuntu 
> et al) te remove it from their repositories in future releases.
>
> I lean towards the first. The application is mostly functional so I wouldn't 
> throw the baby out with the bath water. A few small patches (Like the one 
> linked) can keep it going for a few more years.
>
Hi, yeah I think that the problem today is that cd rip and burning for
music is a bit outdated, probably would be better to transform it to a
phone transfer
music app or a burning to USB one. YOu know what I mean, but surely
its a nice app, I used it in the past quite some.

> Kind regards,
>
> Kevin
>
> ps. First time ever on a mailing list, so please let me know if I'm way to 
> formal or if I make a very Dutch impression.
Welcome, all was ok :)
Rgds
Saxa

> ___
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Sound Juicer support and/or EoL

2019-12-03 Thread Kevin Degeling
Hey All,

After reporting an issue related to Sound Juicer, I discovered that the
project has been mostly abandoned. There is still a valuable pull
request open (
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sound-juicer/merge_requests/2) but for
the most part active maintainance has stopped. This puts the
application on a crossroads:

- Approve pending pull requests and assign a new owner, if only for
minimal maintainance.
- End of Life the project, and inform all downstream projects (Fedora,
Ubuntu et al) te remove it from their repositories in future releases.

I lean towards the first. The application is mostly functional so I
wouldn't throw the baby out with the bath water. A few small patches
(Like the one linked) can keep it going for a few more years.

Kind regards,

Kevin

ps. First time ever on a mailing list, so please let me know if I'm way
to formal or if I make a very Dutch impression.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list