Re: Stable release policy
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 04:35:43PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 21:10 +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote: I'd expect core projects to at least make all the releases listed in the schedule, but if useful bug fixes have queued up since May 14, it would make sense to make a release, right? Hey Ross, Of course. You can unscheduled releases whenever you think one's needed, for exactly that reason: we don't want users to go four months without bugfixes! Just be reasonable about the frequency of releases; if you find yourself at 3.x.7 and you're not GTK+ or Evolution then you're probably releasing too frequently. It's normal for GNOME programs to go up to 3.x.3, 3.x.4, and sometimes even 3.x.5. That makes sense, thanks for the answer. Cheers, -- Ross Lagerwall ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Stable release policy
Hi, Is there any policy about releasing updates to stable branches beyond the .1 release or is it simply up to each project? I couldn't find this info anywhere on the wiki... Thanks, -- Ross Lagerwall ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: Stable release policy
Hi, On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 19:59 +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote: Is there any policy about releasing updates to stable branches beyond the .1 release or is it simply up to each project? I couldn't find this info anywhere on the wiki... A stable .2 is listed on https://wiki.gnome.org/ThreePointThirteen#Schedule Core projects are expected to follow the release schedule. See also https://wiki.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner Cheers, andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
