Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.master'
2013/10/5 GNOME Status Pages nore...@gnome.org: This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org. There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-backgrounds.master': + Bokeh Tails + Dark Ivy + Flower Bed + Lock Screen + Signpost of the Shadows + Stones + Whispy Tails Is there a reason why this landed without i18n approval? Are you going to branch before these commits? Best regards, -- Piotr Drąg http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.master'
On 5 Oct 2013, at 22:00, Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/10/5 GNOME Status Pages nore...@gnome.org: This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org. There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-backgrounds.master': + Bokeh Tails + Dark Ivy + Flower Bed + Lock Screen + Signpost of the Shadows + Stones + Whispy Tails Is there a reason why this landed without i18n approval? Are you going to branch before these commits? The strings aren't user visible and the commits already had acks from the release team. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.master'
On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 17:49 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: On 5 Oct 2013, at 22:00, Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/10/5 GNOME Status Pages nore...@gnome.org: This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org. There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-backgrounds.master': + Bokeh Tails + Dark Ivy + Flower Bed + Lock Screen + Signpost of the Shadows + Stones + Whispy Tails Is there a reason why this landed without i18n approval? Are you going to branch before these commits? The strings aren't user visible and the commits already had acks from the release team. If they aren't user visible, why are they marked for translation? andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: String additions to 'gnome-backgrounds.master'
On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 18:01 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: On Sun, 2013-10-06 at 17:49 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: On 5 Oct 2013, at 22:00, Piotr Drąg piotrd...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/10/5 GNOME Status Pages nore...@gnome.org: This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org. There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-backgrounds.master': + Bokeh Tails + Dark Ivy + Flower Bed + Lock Screen + Signpost of the Shadows + Stones + Whispy Tails Is there a reason why this landed without i18n approval? Are you going to branch before these commits? The strings aren't user visible and the commits already had acks from the release team. If they aren't user visible, why are they marked for translation? Because they used to be visible prior to the Background redesign in 3.6. We still have the same problem in GSettings schemas where, in the past, we translated strings that weren't actually user visible. It would be good if we could mark strings as it would be nice if it were translated, but not a problem if not. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
