Re: gtkmm as a dependency
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 17:06 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: What's that noise? Oh, it's the collective teeth-gnashing from OpenSolaris guys :) I don't understand. Is there a problem that we can help with? Not my department, but I gather that C++ ABI problems mean we'll probably have to ship and support two different versions of some libraries (one compiled with Sun Studio, the other with g++). Cheeri, Calum. -- CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]GNOME Desktop Group http://ie.sun.com +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: gtkmm as a dependency
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:37 +0100, Calum Benson wrote: On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 17:06 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: What's that noise? Oh, it's the collective teeth-gnashing from OpenSolaris guys :) I don't understand. Is there a problem that we can help with? Not my department, but I gather that C++ ABI problems mean we'll probably have to ship and support two different versions of some libraries (one compiled with Sun Studio, the other with g++). I'm sure that gtkmm isn't the first C++ library that SUN has used. This is just a normal part of supporting two C++ compilers at the moment. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: gtkmm as a dependency
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 16:18 +0100, Calum Benson wrote: On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 19:32 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: Hi, It was recently discussed whether to allow modules in desktop/admin/develtools to have a dependency on gtkmm[1]. Several people voiced support for the proposal; not a single person objected. This made our decision on the topic at the recent release-team meeting very easy. :-) gtkmm is now allowed as a dependency. What's that noise? Oh, it's the collective teeth-gnashing from OpenSolaris guys :) I don't understand. Is there a problem that we can help with? -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: gtkmm as a dependency
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 19:32 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: Hi, It was recently discussed whether to allow modules in desktop/admin/develtools to have a dependency on gtkmm[1]. Several people voiced support for the proposal; not a single person objected. This made our decision on the topic at the recent release-team meeting very easy. :-) gtkmm is now allowed as a dependency. What's that noise? Oh, it's the collective teeth-gnashing from OpenSolaris guys :) Cheeri, Calum. -- CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]GNOME Desktop Group http://ie.sun.com +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: gtkmm as a dependency
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 19:32:30 -0600 Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This made our decision on the topic at the recent release-team meeting very easy. :-) gtkmm is now allowed as a dependency. What a nice easter present :-) -- Dodji Seketeli http://www.seketeli.org/dodji ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: gtkmm as a dependency
Le lundi 09 avril 2007 à 19:32 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : Hi, gtkmm is now allowed as a dependency. Is it only gtkmm or also the bindings for gnomevfs, gconf, etc ? -- Benoît Dejean GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/ LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Re: gtkmm as a dependency
Le mardi 10 avril 2007, à 21:04, Benoît Dejean a écrit : Le lundi 09 avril 2007 à 19:32 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : Hi, gtkmm is now allowed as a dependency. Is it only gtkmm or also the bindings for gnomevfs, gconf, etc ? All the C++ bindings that are part of the bindings suite. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
