[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1164016] Re: restore type-ahead find

2018-08-13 Thread Andrew Simpson
There is a fundamental difference between search (what you do when you
don't know where something is) and navigate (what you do when you know
exactly where something is, and want to go there). Why the gnome team
have chosen to conflate them, and their mental state while doing so, is
anyone's guess. But from a usability perspective, it is broken.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1164016

Title:
  restore type-ahead find

Status in Nautilus:
  Expired
Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-settings package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  GNOME removed type-ahead find in Nautilus 3.6, not without
  controversy:

  https://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-
  list/2012-August/msg2.html

  Now when you type in a Nautilus window, Nautilus immediately performs
  a search in the current directory and all its subdirectories.  I
  personally find this annoying.  If I want to search, I'll click the
  search icon.  Often I'm looking at a long directory listing and simply
  want to jump to a certain point in it, and type-ahead find works great
  for that.

  Would Ubuntu consider patching type-ahead find back in?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1164016/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1666681] Re: Restore interactive_search.patch (type-ahead search)

2018-03-07 Thread Andrew Simpson
It's a shame there is no way to vote for things here, and instead weight
seems given to bugs with a large number of comments / activity.

The current version of nautilus, which is the very core of Ubuntu, is
broken. Search is not the same as navigation. I do not want to search my
files when I know exactly where the file I want is - I want to go to it.

There are full time Ubuntu developers. This should not be waiting for a
user to contribute a patch.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181

Title:
  Restore interactive_search.patch (type-ahead search)

Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  Nautilus dropped the popular type-ahead search feature years ago.
  Ubuntu has been carrying a patch to revert that change. See bug
  1164016 for the original LP bug and patch proposal.

  Nautilus is now under very active development. During the 3.22 cycle,
  that patch needed to be rebased. I tried to do it and what I came up
  with caused a crash (it didn't really crash for me, but ricotz and
  some others experienced it) and the first letter typed activated type-
  ahead search but the first letter was dropped. In other words, you
  would need to type "ddow" to activate the Downloads folder instead of
  just "dow" like in previous releases. (LP: #1635988)

  I did that rebase in October 2016 and no one has stepped up then to
  improve the patch.

  The Nautilus maintainer csoriano has said that the slots and views
  changed significantly during 3.22 and will likely be refactored more
  in the future.

  If there's no one available to maintain the patch, unfortunately,
  we'll eventually have to drop the patch to not be stuck on an ancient
  version of Nautilus.

  I am proposing that we do this at the start of the 17.10 development
  cycle. This gives 6 months for a developer to step up and try to fix
  the patch and 12 months before 18.04 LTS.

  Other Items
  ===
  - For better performance with the built-in search, we need to reconsider 
avoiding tracker in Unity (LP: #176)

  - There is an option in Preferences for users to disable searching in
  subfolders. I don't think we want to do that by default but maybe it
  can help some people.

  The current Nautilus 3.24 packaging is in the GNOME3 Staging PPA with
  this patch now disabled.

  
https://launchpad.net/~gnome3-team/+archive/ubuntu/gnome3-staging/+packages?field.series_filter=zesty

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/181/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1164016] Re: restore type-ahead find

2018-03-07 Thread Andrew Simpson
> Oh I see why: most of us cannot change back the status of the bug once
it has been changed to "fix released" (which is stupid, too).

If that is genuinely the reason (and this bug has been marked as "Fix
Released" since Jan 2014, so it seems correct), then is it not time to
raise a new bug?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1164016

Title:
  restore type-ahead find

Status in Nautilus:
  Expired
Status in nautilus package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-settings package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  GNOME removed type-ahead find in Nautilus 3.6, not without
  controversy:

  https://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-
  list/2012-August/msg2.html

  Now when you type in a Nautilus window, Nautilus immediately performs
  a search in the current directory and all its subdirectories.  I
  personally find this annoying.  If I want to search, I'll click the
  search icon.  Often I'm looking at a long directory listing and simply
  want to jump to a certain point in it, and type-ahead find works great
  for that.

  Would Ubuntu consider patching type-ahead find back in?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1164016/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 755342] Re: Samsung Xcover 271 B2710 mass storage does not mount automatically

2015-03-23 Thread Andrew Simpson
This is with the same phone from #14

$ cd /sys/bus/usb/drivers/usb-storage/2-1.6:1.0/host7/target7:0:0/7:0:0:0
$ cat vendor
Samsung 
$ cat model
GT-S5510T   
$ cat rev
2.31

I couldn't find directory 'usb-storage' in /sys/usb/drivers  unless I
did 'DisableSwitching=1'.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to usb-modeswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755342

Title:
  Samsung Xcover 271 B2710 mass storage does not mount automatically

Status in usb-modeswitch package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Steps to reproduce:
  1. In the interface of the Samsung Xcover 271 B2710, set it to connect as 
mass storage.
  2. Connect it to the computer via USB cabel.

  Notice that it does not mount automatically. Also it does mount
  automatically when instead of step 1 it is set to connect to Samsung
  Kies or to sync with a media player.

  Below I provide output from dmesg and lsusb -vv.

  Output from dmesg as it is connected (step 2):
  [101332.680133] usb 2-6: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 
6
  [101333.630726] Initializing USB Mass Storage driver...
  [101333.630861] scsi5 : usb-storage 2-6:1.0
  [101333.630956] usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage
  [101333.630958] USB Mass Storage support registered.

  Output from lsusb -vv:
  Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
  Device Descriptor:
    bLength18
    bDescriptorType 1
    bcdUSB   1.10
    bDeviceClass9 Hub
    bDeviceSubClass 0 Unused
    bDeviceProtocol 0 Full speed (or root) hub
    bMaxPacketSize064
    idVendor   0x1d6b Linux Foundation
    idProduct  0x0001 1.1 root hub
    bcdDevice2.06
    iManufacturer   3
    iProduct2
    iSerial 1
    bNumConfigurations  1
    Configuration Descriptor:
  bLength 9
  bDescriptorType 2
  wTotalLength   25
  bNumInterfaces  1
  bConfigurationValue 1
  iConfiguration  0
  bmAttributes 0xe0
    Self Powered
    Remote Wakeup
  MaxPower0mA
  Interface Descriptor:
    bLength 9
    bDescriptorType 4
    bInterfaceNumber0
    bAlternateSetting   0
    bNumEndpoints   1
    bInterfaceClass 9 Hub
    bInterfaceSubClass  0 Unused
    bInterfaceProtocol  0 Full speed (or root) hub
    iInterface  0
    Endpoint Descriptor:
  bLength 7
  bDescriptorType 5
  bEndpointAddress 0x81  EP 1 IN
  bmAttributes3
    Transfer TypeInterrupt
    Synch Type   None
    Usage Type   Data
  wMaxPacketSize 0x0002  1x 2 bytes
  bInterval 255
  can't get hub descriptor: Operation not permitted
  cannot read device status, Operation not permitted (1)

  Bus 006 Device 002: ID 046d:c01b Logitech, Inc. MX310 Optical Mouse
  Device Descriptor:
    bLength18
    bDescriptorType 1
    bcdUSB   2.00
    bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level)
    bDeviceSubClass 0
    bDeviceProtocol 0
    bMaxPacketSize0 8
    idVendor   0x046d Logitech, Inc.
    idProduct  0xc01b MX310 Optical Mouse
    bcdDevice   18.00
    iManufacturer   1
    iProduct2
    iSerial 0
    bNumConfigurations  1
    Configuration Descriptor:
  bLength 9
  bDescriptorType 2
  wTotalLength   34
  bNumInterfaces  1
  bConfigurationValue 1
  iConfiguration  0
  bmAttributes 0xa0
    (Bus Powered)
    Remote Wakeup
  MaxPower   98mA
  Interface Descriptor:
    bLength 9
    bDescriptorType 4
    bInterfaceNumber0
    bAlternateSetting   0
    bNumEndpoints   1
    bInterfaceClass 3 Human Interface Device
    bInterfaceSubClass  1 Boot Interface Subclass
    bInterfaceProtocol  2 Mouse
    iInterface  0
  HID Device Descriptor:
    bLength 9
    bDescriptorType33
    bcdHID   1.10
    bCountryCode0 Not supported
    bNumDescriptors 1
    bDescriptorType34 Report
    wDescriptorLength  64
   Report Descriptors:
     ** UNAVAILABLE **
    Endpoint Descriptor:
  bLength 7
  bDescriptorType 5
  bEndpointAddress 0x81  EP 1 IN
  

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1223181] Re: After upgrading to saucy, eclipse crashes in gtk_tree_view_get_background_area+0x8a while debugging

2014-02-01 Thread Andrew Simpson
Seems to be related to KDE bug #324438
(https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324438) which was fixed in KDE bug
#329112  (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329112).

There is a patch and reference to a git commit in #329112 which claims
to have fixed the problem.

** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #329112
   https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=329112

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1223181

Title:
  After upgrading to saucy, eclipse crashes in
  gtk_tree_view_get_background_area+0x8a while debugging

Status in “gtk+2.0” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  to reproduce, I open the Variables view in eclipse and step through
  the application. the eclipse jvm crashes with:

  #
  # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
  #
  #  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x7f3dea4082aa, pid=11567, tid=139905336198912
  #
  # JRE version: 7.0_21-b11
  # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (23.21-b01 mixed mode 
linux-amd64 compressed oops)
  # Problematic frame:
  # C  [libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0+0x2202aa]  gtk_tree_view_get_background_area+0x8a
  #
  # Core dump written. Default location: /home/juergen/core or core.11567
  #
  # An error report file with more information is saved as:
  # /home/juergen/hs_err_pid11567.log
  #
  # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
  #   http://bugreport.sun.com/bugreport/crash.jsp
  # The crash happened outside the Java Virtual Machine in native code.
  # See problematic frame for where to report the bug.
  #

  This did not happen in ubuntu 13.04.

  using KDE as a desktop (installed ubuntu, installed kde packages)

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: libgtk2.0-0 2.24.20-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-5.11-generic 3.11.0
  Uname: Linux 3.11.0-5-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.12.1-0ubuntu3
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Sep 10 07:25:17 2013
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2010-11-24 (1020 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007)
  MarkForUpload: True
  SourcePackage: gtk+2.0
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-08-29 (11 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+2.0/+bug/1223181/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1164016] Re: restore type-ahead find

2013-07-24 Thread Andrew Simpson
To add my voice to this bug, I installed 13.04 today, on my work
computer (previously Windows 7 only), to enable me to use a variety of
bash scripts to process a large number of files on an external ext3
drive. At home I have 12.10 installed.

The files are images, several thousand per folder, stored in dated
folders (such as 11-04-23-country_location). Now I know, for example,
that I was in Belgium in May 2005, so I type '05-05' and a folder NEAR
the one I want was previously highlighted, allowing me to quickly and
easily find the correct folder. A related task is to go to the next, and
previous, folders. Both of these uses are broken with the new search
set-up.

The Gnome team's total brick-walling of the furious users should give
pause for thought. I simply cannot believe they have shot themselves in
the foot so categorically as to make the staple piece of software, that
underpins their entire user interface, so crippled.

This is a far more serious usability issue than anything thrown up with
the migration to Unity. I would rate it, probably, as the highest, most
disruptive user interface bug I have ever come across in Ubuntu (and
I've been with you since Warty).

The workaround linked by M4he above is good news, but the idea of having
to install a patch to get basic file-browser functionality is insane.
Even more insane than firing up Mac OSX and being faced with the
abomination that is Finder.

Sebastian, it's great news that Ubuntu are listening, and seeing this as
an issue, and I hope a proper solution is forthcoming. At what point
does a frankly bizarre upstream user interface decision like this become
priority #1 at Canonical? When it begins to compromise the very good
work being done with Unity? When does it become worth moving a developer
from Unity onto an issue like this?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1164016

Title:
  restore type-ahead find

Status in Nautilus:
  Invalid
Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  GNOME removed type-ahead find in Nautilus 3.6, not without
  controversy:

  https://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-
  list/2012-August/msg2.html

  Now when you type in a Nautilus window, Nautilus immediately performs
  a search in the current directory and all its subdirectories.  I
  personally find this annoying.  If I want to search, I'll click the
  search icon.  Often I'm looking at a long directory listing and simply
  want to jump to a certain point in it, and type-ahead find works great
  for that.

  Would Ubuntu consider patching type-ahead find back in?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1164016/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1070677] Re: Xorg fails to start because of Radeon Issue

2012-11-17 Thread Andrew Simpson
Similar to item #5.  Using 3.2.0-33 pae on 32 bit, cannot get X to start
when using the VGA port.  The DVI port does however work.

Reverting back to 3.2.0-32 is a good work around.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1070677

Title:
  Xorg fails to start because of Radeon Issue

Status in “xserver-xorg-video-ati” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Roughly 30% of the time I boot my system X does not start, instead I
  boot into a shell. Looking at the Xorg.log I see:

  [19.593] (EE) RADEON(0): [drm] failed to set drm interface version.
  [19.593] (EE) RADEON(0): Kernel modesetting setup failed
  [19.593] (II) UnloadModule: radeon
  [19.593] (II) Unloading radeon
  [19.593] (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
  [19.593] 
  Fatal server error:
  [19.593] no screens found

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.6+12ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-33.52-generic 3.2.31
  Uname: Linux 3.2.0-33-generic x86_64
  .tmp.unity.support.test.0:
   
  ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu14
  Architecture: amd64
  CompizPlugins: 
[core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,vpswitch,snap,mousepoll,resize,place,move,wall,grid,regex,imgpng,session,gnomecompat,animation,fade,unitymtgrabhandles,workarounds,scale,expo,ezoom,unityshell]
  CompositorRunning: compiz
  Date: Wed Oct 24 01:40:51 2012
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: precise
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, even including gdb or git bisection work if 
needed
  GraphicsCard:
   Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI Redwood [Radeon HD 5670] [1002:68d8] 
(prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
 Subsystem: VISIONTEK Device [1545:5670]
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120301)
  MachineType: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-880GMA-UD2H
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-33-generic 
root=UUID=e50fd3cf-9c17-4365-845e-1eb7d14d512e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 09/30/2010
  dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software International, Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: F5
  dmi.board.name: GA-880GMA-UD2H
  dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
  dmi.board.version: x.x
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAwardSoftwareInternational,Inc.:bvrF5:bd09/30/2010:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnGA-880GMA-UD2H:pvr:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnGA-880GMA-UD2H:rvrx.x:cvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvr:
  dmi.product.name: GA-880GMA-UD2H
  dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1.4
  version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.32-1ubuntu1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.4-0ubuntu0.1
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.8
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.0-0ubuntu1.2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 
1:6.14.99~git20111219.aacbd629-0ubuntu2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.17.0-1ubuntu4.2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:0.0.16+git20111201+b5534a1-1build2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/1070677/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Desktop-packages] [Bug 755342] Re: Samsung Xcover 271 B2710 mass storage does not mount automatically

2012-10-16 Thread Andrew Simpson
Regarding comment #8.  Can now confirm that usb_modeswitch is not
working with Kubuntu 12.04.  Changing the config file to
'DisableSwitching=1' provides a fix.

Have enabled debugging (EnableLogging=1) and collected debugging
information with 'DisableSwitching=0'.  File is attached.



** Attachment added: usb_modeswitch.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-modeswitch/+bug/755342/+attachment/3399845/+files/usb_modeswitch.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to usb-modeswitch in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755342

Title:
  Samsung Xcover 271 B2710 mass storage does not mount automatically

Status in “usb-modeswitch” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Steps to reproduce:
  1. In the interface of the Samsung Xcover 271 B2710, set it to connect as 
mass storage.
  2. Connect it to the computer via USB cabel.

  Notice that it does not mount automatically. Also it does mount
  automatically when instead of step 1 it is set to connect to Samsung
  Kies or to sync with a media player.

  Below I provide output from dmesg and lsusb -vv.

  Output from dmesg as it is connected (step 2):
  [101332.680133] usb 2-6: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 
6
  [101333.630726] Initializing USB Mass Storage driver...
  [101333.630861] scsi5 : usb-storage 2-6:1.0
  [101333.630956] usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage
  [101333.630958] USB Mass Storage support registered.

  Output from lsusb -vv:
  Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
  Device Descriptor:
    bLength18
    bDescriptorType 1
    bcdUSB   1.10
    bDeviceClass9 Hub
    bDeviceSubClass 0 Unused
    bDeviceProtocol 0 Full speed (or root) hub
    bMaxPacketSize064
    idVendor   0x1d6b Linux Foundation
    idProduct  0x0001 1.1 root hub
    bcdDevice2.06
    iManufacturer   3
    iProduct2
    iSerial 1
    bNumConfigurations  1
    Configuration Descriptor:
  bLength 9
  bDescriptorType 2
  wTotalLength   25
  bNumInterfaces  1
  bConfigurationValue 1
  iConfiguration  0
  bmAttributes 0xe0
    Self Powered
    Remote Wakeup
  MaxPower0mA
  Interface Descriptor:
    bLength 9
    bDescriptorType 4
    bInterfaceNumber0
    bAlternateSetting   0
    bNumEndpoints   1
    bInterfaceClass 9 Hub
    bInterfaceSubClass  0 Unused
    bInterfaceProtocol  0 Full speed (or root) hub
    iInterface  0
    Endpoint Descriptor:
  bLength 7
  bDescriptorType 5
  bEndpointAddress 0x81  EP 1 IN
  bmAttributes3
    Transfer TypeInterrupt
    Synch Type   None
    Usage Type   Data
  wMaxPacketSize 0x0002  1x 2 bytes
  bInterval 255
  can't get hub descriptor: Operation not permitted
  cannot read device status, Operation not permitted (1)

  Bus 006 Device 002: ID 046d:c01b Logitech, Inc. MX310 Optical Mouse
  Device Descriptor:
    bLength18
    bDescriptorType 1
    bcdUSB   2.00
    bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level)
    bDeviceSubClass 0
    bDeviceProtocol 0
    bMaxPacketSize0 8
    idVendor   0x046d Logitech, Inc.
    idProduct  0xc01b MX310 Optical Mouse
    bcdDevice   18.00
    iManufacturer   1
    iProduct2
    iSerial 0
    bNumConfigurations  1
    Configuration Descriptor:
  bLength 9
  bDescriptorType 2
  wTotalLength   34
  bNumInterfaces  1
  bConfigurationValue 1
  iConfiguration  0
  bmAttributes 0xa0
    (Bus Powered)
    Remote Wakeup
  MaxPower   98mA
  Interface Descriptor:
    bLength 9
    bDescriptorType 4
    bInterfaceNumber0
    bAlternateSetting   0
    bNumEndpoints   1
    bInterfaceClass 3 Human Interface Device
    bInterfaceSubClass  1 Boot Interface Subclass
    bInterfaceProtocol  2 Mouse
    iInterface  0
  HID Device Descriptor:
    bLength 9
    bDescriptorType33
    bcdHID   1.10
    bCountryCode0 Not supported
    bNumDescriptors 1
    bDescriptorType34 Report
    wDescriptorLength  64
   Report Descriptors:
     ** 

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 741067] Re: Returning from console to guest session asks for a non-existent password

2012-05-15 Thread Andrew Simpson
Robert, this happens in lightdm with a default 12.04 install, and is
fully reproduceable. Simply switching out of and back into the guest
session prompts for password.

This is a re-occurance of bug 275768, recorded (and fixed) in October
2008.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741067

Title:
  Returning from console to guest session asks for a non-existent
  password

Status in “gdm-guest-session” package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in “lightdm” package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: gdm-guest-session

  gdm-guest-session 0.23, gdm 2.32.0-0ubuntu12, Ubuntu Natty

  1. Switch to a guest session.
  2. Type Ctrl+Alt+F6 to switch to a console.
  3. Type Alt+F8 to return to GDM.
  4. Choose the guest session.

  What happens: The login screen asks you for a password for the guest
  session.

  What should happen: The login screen should not ask you for a
  password.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm-guest-session/+bug/741067/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp