I believe i'm still experiencing the problems.

I have a set of backups from a machine which started with Ubuntu 12.04
and was upgraded a few weeks ago to 13.10. The backups were created via
deja-dup. I'm trying to restore on a Machine Running Linux Mint (
~Ubuntu 13.10) with duplicity 0.6.21-0ubuntu4.1.

Here's what i get when i try to restore my backup manually (duplicity, not 
deja-dup):
python: ERROR: (rs_file_copy_cb) unexpected eof on fd122
python: ERROR: (rs_job_complete) patch job failed: unexpected end of input
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 1414, in <module>
    with_tempdir(main)
  File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 1407, in with_tempdir
    fn()
  File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 1341, in main
    restore(col_stats)
  File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 635, in restore
    restore_get_patched_rop_iter(col_stats)):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line 526, in 
Write_ROPaths
    for ropath in rop_iter:
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line 499, in 
integrate_patch_iters
    final_ropath = patch_seq2ropath( normalize_ps( patch_seq ) )
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/patchdir.py", line 479, in 
patch_seq2ropath
    misc.copyfileobj( current_file, tempfp )
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/misc.py", line 166, in 
copyfileobj
    buf = infp.read(blocksize)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/librsync.py", line 80, in 
read
    self._add_to_outbuf_once()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity/librsync.py", line 94, in 
_add_to_outbuf_once
    raise librsyncError(str(e))
librsyncError: librsync error 103 while in patch cycle

deja-dup detects that there's a problem and bails out. If i try to restore via 
duplicity, i get this message and the application hangs.
A ps -ef ef shows that there's the duplicity process, which deja-dup started, 
is still lingering around. My current process is idling.

Did i miss something?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to duplicity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1252484

Title:
  Possible data loss when restarting in the middle of a deleted file

Status in Duplicity - Bandwidth Efficient Encrypted Backup:
  Fix Committed
Status in “duplicity” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in “duplicity” source package in Lucid:
  Fix Committed
Status in “duplicity” source package in Precise:
  Fix Committed
Status in “duplicity” source package in Quantal:
  Fix Committed
Status in “duplicity” source package in Raring:
  Fix Committed
Status in “duplicity” source package in Saucy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  This was recently fixed in duplicity trunk.  But I'm filing a bug for
  paperwork purposes and for Ubuntu SRUs.

  [Impact]

  When restarting a backup, duplicity may accidentally skip the first
  65k chunk of one of the source files.  This means that when it is
  restored, it will be incomplete/corrupted, resulting in data loss.

  [Test Case]

  Download and install the 'test1.sh' file attached to this bug report, and run 
it like 'sh test1.sh'.  If it prints the following line, the bug is present:
  Binary files /tmp/source/newfile and /tmp/restore/newfile differ

  Or, follow these manual steps:
  mkdir /tmp/source
  dd if=/dev/urandom of=/tmp/source/bigfile bs=1024 count=5000
  # This next command will intentionally fail after the second volume!
  duplicity full /tmp/source file:///tmp/backup --vol 1 --fail 2 --no-encryption
  mv /tmp/source/bigfile /tmp/source/newfile
  duplicity full /tmp/source file:///tmp/backup --no-encryption
  duplicity restore file:///tmp/backup /tmp/restore --no-encryption
  # This next line will say the files differ if the bug is present
  diff /tmp/source/newfile /tmp/restore/newfile

  [Regression Potential]

  It's a relatively small patch, only affecting the specific case of
  restarting a backup when the file we were in the middle of is no
  longer there.  I'd say minor regression potential.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/1252484/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to