Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi

I identified several broken links (including download locations). I’m fixing 
that.

Thanks,
Regards
JB

> Le 17 déc. 2020 à 11:34, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> 
> Will there be an announcement mail? The 5.15.13 page also didn't look
> to change in the website update commit, so the links will remain
> broken.
> 
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 16:53, Robbie Gemmell  wrote:
>> 
>> Are you using an alternative or layered client? The result doesnt
>> present as the typical output of working remotely with repository
>> URLs, instead indicating a pure add rather than referencing the
>> originating commit, and perhaps more notably also doing a simultaneous
>> removal.
>> 
>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 15:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>>> 
>>> I did svn remote, but had "flaky" connection today.
>>> 
>>> It’s now OK.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
 Le 10 déc. 2020 à 15:07, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit 
 :
 
 The commit email and below suggests you are manually adding the files
 again and resending them upon check in? Please just do a remote
 operation instead, it is much less error prone, and far faster too
 given you dont need to resend the data. Example later.
 
 The mail also shows you just removed 5.15.13 from the dist release
 area before the website is updated, this is premature as it will have
 broken a bunch of links to the checksums and signatures until the site
 is actually updated to point those to the archive.
 
 
 Remote operation example from the 5.x release guide page at
 http://activemq.apache.org/release-guide :
 # Example: svn cp -m "add files for activemq-5.15.1"
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.1
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.15.1
 
 (The page is looking a bit stale these days, not sure if it has
 changed any from the old wiki page at
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Release+Guide)
 
 
 
 On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 13:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
 wrote:
> 
> It’s in progress (got some connection issue yesterday evening).
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> Le 10 déc. 2020 à 14:00, Robbie Gemmell  a 
>> écrit :
>> 
>> The maven staging repo was promoted and the bits are listed on
>> central, but the source release / binary conveniences have not been
>> copied to the dist release area and so aren't yet started mirroring.
>> 
>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 16:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi guys,
>>> 
>>> This vote passed with the following result:
>>> 
>>> +1 (binding): JB Onofré, Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon
>>> +1 (non binding): Jamie Goodyear, François Papon
>>> 
>>> Art started to review and I didn’t see his vote.
>>> 
>>> I’m promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org 
>>> , I will update website and announce the 
>>> release.
>>> 
>>> Thanks all for your vote. I’m now moving forward on 5.16.1 and 5.17.0 
>>> preparation.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
 Le 8 déc. 2020 à 13:33, Christopher Shannon 
  a écrit :
 
 +1
 
 On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Francois Papon 
 
 wrote:
 
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> regards,
> 
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
> 
> Le 07/12/2020 à 20:29, Matt Pavlovich a écrit :
>> +1
>> 
>> [PASSED] Ran full build with unit tests against the tag/5.15.14
>> [PASSED] Ran internal test suite validating various configurations
>> 
>> Thanks JB!
>> 
>>> On Dec 4, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
 Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> écrit :
 
 Hi everyone,
 
 I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take
> includes fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
 This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
 
 Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>> 
 
 The Maven staging repository is:
 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
>> 
 
 The dist staging repository is:
 

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Ah 5.15.13, let me fix that (I thought 5.15.14 which should be fine ;) ).

I’m fixing that and I will send the announcement email.

Regards
JB

> Le 17 déc. 2020 à 11:34, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> 
> Will there be an announcement mail? The 5.15.13 page also didn't look
> to change in the website update commit, so the links will remain
> broken.
> 
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 16:53, Robbie Gemmell  wrote:
>> 
>> Are you using an alternative or layered client? The result doesnt
>> present as the typical output of working remotely with repository
>> URLs, instead indicating a pure add rather than referencing the
>> originating commit, and perhaps more notably also doing a simultaneous
>> removal.
>> 
>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 15:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>>> 
>>> I did svn remote, but had "flaky" connection today.
>>> 
>>> It’s now OK.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
 Le 10 déc. 2020 à 15:07, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit 
 :
 
 The commit email and below suggests you are manually adding the files
 again and resending them upon check in? Please just do a remote
 operation instead, it is much less error prone, and far faster too
 given you dont need to resend the data. Example later.
 
 The mail also shows you just removed 5.15.13 from the dist release
 area before the website is updated, this is premature as it will have
 broken a bunch of links to the checksums and signatures until the site
 is actually updated to point those to the archive.
 
 
 Remote operation example from the 5.x release guide page at
 http://activemq.apache.org/release-guide :
 # Example: svn cp -m "add files for activemq-5.15.1"
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.1
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.15.1
 
 (The page is looking a bit stale these days, not sure if it has
 changed any from the old wiki page at
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Release+Guide)
 
 
 
 On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 13:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
 wrote:
> 
> It’s in progress (got some connection issue yesterday evening).
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> Le 10 déc. 2020 à 14:00, Robbie Gemmell  a 
>> écrit :
>> 
>> The maven staging repo was promoted and the bits are listed on
>> central, but the source release / binary conveniences have not been
>> copied to the dist release area and so aren't yet started mirroring.
>> 
>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 16:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi guys,
>>> 
>>> This vote passed with the following result:
>>> 
>>> +1 (binding): JB Onofré, Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon
>>> +1 (non binding): Jamie Goodyear, François Papon
>>> 
>>> Art started to review and I didn’t see his vote.
>>> 
>>> I’m promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org 
>>> , I will update website and announce the 
>>> release.
>>> 
>>> Thanks all for your vote. I’m now moving forward on 5.16.1 and 5.17.0 
>>> preparation.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
 Le 8 déc. 2020 à 13:33, Christopher Shannon 
  a écrit :
 
 +1
 
 On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Francois Papon 
 
 wrote:
 
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> regards,
> 
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
> 
> Le 07/12/2020 à 20:29, Matt Pavlovich a écrit :
>> +1
>> 
>> [PASSED] Ran full build with unit tests against the tag/5.15.14
>> [PASSED] Ran internal test suite validating various configurations
>> 
>> Thanks JB!
>> 
>>> On Dec 4, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
 Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> écrit :
 
 Hi everyone,
 
 I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take
> includes fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
 This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
 
 Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>> 
 
 The Maven staging repository is:
 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
>> 
 
 The dist staging repository is:
 

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi Robbie,

The website should be up to date. Let me check (I pushed the update couple of 
days ago).

And yes for the announcement email.

Regards
JB

> Le 17 déc. 2020 à 11:34, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> 
> Will there be an announcement mail? The 5.15.13 page also didn't look
> to change in the website update commit, so the links will remain
> broken.
> 
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 16:53, Robbie Gemmell  wrote:
>> 
>> Are you using an alternative or layered client? The result doesnt
>> present as the typical output of working remotely with repository
>> URLs, instead indicating a pure add rather than referencing the
>> originating commit, and perhaps more notably also doing a simultaneous
>> removal.
>> 
>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 15:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>>> 
>>> I did svn remote, but had "flaky" connection today.
>>> 
>>> It’s now OK.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
 Le 10 déc. 2020 à 15:07, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit 
 :
 
 The commit email and below suggests you are manually adding the files
 again and resending them upon check in? Please just do a remote
 operation instead, it is much less error prone, and far faster too
 given you dont need to resend the data. Example later.
 
 The mail also shows you just removed 5.15.13 from the dist release
 area before the website is updated, this is premature as it will have
 broken a bunch of links to the checksums and signatures until the site
 is actually updated to point those to the archive.
 
 
 Remote operation example from the 5.x release guide page at
 http://activemq.apache.org/release-guide :
 # Example: svn cp -m "add files for activemq-5.15.1"
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.1
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.15.1
 
 (The page is looking a bit stale these days, not sure if it has
 changed any from the old wiki page at
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Release+Guide)
 
 
 
 On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 13:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
 wrote:
> 
> It’s in progress (got some connection issue yesterday evening).
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> Le 10 déc. 2020 à 14:00, Robbie Gemmell  a 
>> écrit :
>> 
>> The maven staging repo was promoted and the bits are listed on
>> central, but the source release / binary conveniences have not been
>> copied to the dist release area and so aren't yet started mirroring.
>> 
>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 16:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi guys,
>>> 
>>> This vote passed with the following result:
>>> 
>>> +1 (binding): JB Onofré, Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon
>>> +1 (non binding): Jamie Goodyear, François Papon
>>> 
>>> Art started to review and I didn’t see his vote.
>>> 
>>> I’m promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org 
>>> , I will update website and announce the 
>>> release.
>>> 
>>> Thanks all for your vote. I’m now moving forward on 5.16.1 and 5.17.0 
>>> preparation.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
 Le 8 déc. 2020 à 13:33, Christopher Shannon 
  a écrit :
 
 +1
 
 On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Francois Papon 
 
 wrote:
 
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> regards,
> 
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
> 
> Le 07/12/2020 à 20:29, Matt Pavlovich a écrit :
>> +1
>> 
>> [PASSED] Ran full build with unit tests against the tag/5.15.14
>> [PASSED] Ran internal test suite validating various configurations
>> 
>> Thanks JB!
>> 
>>> On Dec 4, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> wrote:
>>> 
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
 Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> écrit :
 
 Hi everyone,
 
 I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take
> includes fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
 This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
 
 Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>> 
 
 The Maven staging repository is:
 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
>> 
 
 The dist staging repository is:
 

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Robbie Gemmell]

Will there be an announcement mail? The 5.15.13 page also didn't look
to change in the website update commit, so the links will remain
broken.

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 16:53, Robbie Gemmell  wrote:
>
> Are you using an alternative or layered client? The result doesnt
> present as the typical output of working remotely with repository
> URLs, instead indicating a pure add rather than referencing the
> originating commit, and perhaps more notably also doing a simultaneous
> removal.
>
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 15:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
> >
> > I did svn remote, but had "flaky" connection today.
> >
> > It’s now OK.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > > Le 10 déc. 2020 à 15:07, Robbie Gemmell  a 
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > > The commit email and below suggests you are manually adding the files
> > > again and resending them upon check in? Please just do a remote
> > > operation instead, it is much less error prone, and far faster too
> > > given you dont need to resend the data. Example later.
> > >
> > > The mail also shows you just removed 5.15.13 from the dist release
> > > area before the website is updated, this is premature as it will have
> > > broken a bunch of links to the checksums and signatures until the site
> > > is actually updated to point those to the archive.
> > >
> > >
> > > Remote operation example from the 5.x release guide page at
> > > http://activemq.apache.org/release-guide :
> > > # Example: svn cp -m "add files for activemq-5.15.1"
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.1
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.15.1
> > >
> > > (The page is looking a bit stale these days, not sure if it has
> > > changed any from the old wiki page at
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Release+Guide)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 13:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> It’s in progress (got some connection issue yesterday evening).
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> JB
> > >>
> > >>> Le 10 déc. 2020 à 14:00, Robbie Gemmell  a 
> > >>> écrit :
> > >>>
> > >>> The maven staging repo was promoted and the bits are listed on
> > >>> central, but the source release / binary conveniences have not been
> > >>> copied to the dist release area and so aren't yet started mirroring.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 16:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> > >>> wrote:
> > 
> >  Hi guys,
> > 
> >  This vote passed with the following result:
> > 
> >  +1 (binding): JB Onofré, Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon
> >  +1 (non binding): Jamie Goodyear, François Papon
> > 
> >  Art started to review and I didn’t see his vote.
> > 
> >  I’m promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org 
> >  , I will update website and announce the 
> >  release.
> > 
> >  Thanks all for your vote. I’m now moving forward on 5.16.1 and 5.17.0 
> >  preparation.
> > 
> >  Regards
> >  JB
> > 
> > > Le 8 déc. 2020 à 13:33, Christopher Shannon 
> > >  a écrit :
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Francois Papon 
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>
> > >> regards,
> > >>
> > >> François
> > >> fpa...@apache.org
> > >>
> > >> Le 07/12/2020 à 20:29, Matt Pavlovich a écrit :
> > >>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> [PASSED] Ran full build with unit tests against the tag/5.15.14
> > >>> [PASSED] Ran internal test suite validating various configurations
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks JB!
> > >>>
> >  On Dec 4, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> >  
> > >> wrote:
> > 
> >  +1 (binding)
> > 
> >  Regards
> >  JB
> > 
> > > Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> > >> écrit :
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take
> > >> includes fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
> > > This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> > >
> > > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> > >
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> > >> <
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> > >>>
> > >
> > > The Maven staging repository is:
> > >
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> > >> <
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> > >>>
> > >
> > > The dist staging repository is:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> > > <
> > >> 

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Robbie Gemmell]

Are you using an alternative or layered client? The result doesnt
present as the typical output of working remotely with repository
URLs, instead indicating a pure add rather than referencing the
originating commit, and perhaps more notably also doing a simultaneous
removal.

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 15:50, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>
> I did svn remote, but had "flaky" connection today.
>
> It’s now OK.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 10 déc. 2020 à 15:07, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> >
> > The commit email and below suggests you are manually adding the files
> > again and resending them upon check in? Please just do a remote
> > operation instead, it is much less error prone, and far faster too
> > given you dont need to resend the data. Example later.
> >
> > The mail also shows you just removed 5.15.13 from the dist release
> > area before the website is updated, this is premature as it will have
> > broken a bunch of links to the checksums and signatures until the site
> > is actually updated to point those to the archive.
> >
> >
> > Remote operation example from the 5.x release guide page at
> > http://activemq.apache.org/release-guide :
> > # Example: svn cp -m "add files for activemq-5.15.1"
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.1
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.15.1
> >
> > (The page is looking a bit stale these days, not sure if it has
> > changed any from the old wiki page at
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Release+Guide)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 13:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> It’s in progress (got some connection issue yesterday evening).
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>> Le 10 déc. 2020 à 14:00, Robbie Gemmell  a 
> >>> écrit :
> >>>
> >>> The maven staging repo was promoted and the bits are listed on
> >>> central, but the source release / binary conveniences have not been
> >>> copied to the dist release area and so aren't yet started mirroring.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 16:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Hi guys,
> 
>  This vote passed with the following result:
> 
>  +1 (binding): JB Onofré, Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon
>  +1 (non binding): Jamie Goodyear, François Papon
> 
>  Art started to review and I didn’t see his vote.
> 
>  I’m promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org 
>  , I will update website and announce the 
>  release.
> 
>  Thanks all for your vote. I’m now moving forward on 5.16.1 and 5.17.0 
>  preparation.
> 
>  Regards
>  JB
> 
> > Le 8 déc. 2020 à 13:33, Christopher Shannon 
> >  a écrit :
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Francois Papon 
> > 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> François
> >> fpa...@apache.org
> >>
> >> Le 07/12/2020 à 20:29, Matt Pavlovich a écrit :
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> [PASSED] Ran full build with unit tests against the tag/5.15.14
> >>> [PASSED] Ran internal test suite validating various configurations
> >>>
> >>> Thanks JB!
> >>>
>  On Dec 4, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> >> wrote:
> 
>  +1 (binding)
> 
>  Regards
>  JB
> 
> > Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> >> écrit :
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take
> >> includes fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
> > This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> >
> > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >> <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >>>
> >
> > The Maven staging repository is:
> >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> >> <
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> >>>
> >
> > The dist staging repository is:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
> >
> > Git tag:
> > activemq-5.15.14
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
> >>
> 
> >>
>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

I did svn remote, but had "flaky" connection today.

It’s now OK.

Regards
JB

> Le 10 déc. 2020 à 15:07, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> 
> The commit email and below suggests you are manually adding the files
> again and resending them upon check in? Please just do a remote
> operation instead, it is much less error prone, and far faster too
> given you dont need to resend the data. Example later.
> 
> The mail also shows you just removed 5.15.13 from the dist release
> area before the website is updated, this is premature as it will have
> broken a bunch of links to the checksums and signatures until the site
> is actually updated to point those to the archive.
> 
> 
> Remote operation example from the 5.x release guide page at
> http://activemq.apache.org/release-guide :
> # Example: svn cp -m "add files for activemq-5.15.1"
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.1
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.15.1
> 
> (The page is looking a bit stale these days, not sure if it has
> changed any from the old wiki page at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Release+Guide)
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 13:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>> 
>> It’s in progress (got some connection issue yesterday evening).
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 10 déc. 2020 à 14:00, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
>>> 
>>> The maven staging repo was promoted and the bits are listed on
>>> central, but the source release / binary conveniences have not been
>>> copied to the dist release area and so aren't yet started mirroring.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 16:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
 
 Hi guys,
 
 This vote passed with the following result:
 
 +1 (binding): JB Onofré, Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon
 +1 (non binding): Jamie Goodyear, François Papon
 
 Art started to review and I didn’t see his vote.
 
 I’m promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org 
 , I will update website and announce the release.
 
 Thanks all for your vote. I’m now moving forward on 5.16.1 and 5.17.0 
 preparation.
 
 Regards
 JB
 
> Le 8 déc. 2020 à 13:33, Christopher Shannon 
>  a écrit :
> 
> +1
> 
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Francois Papon 
> 
> wrote:
> 
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> François
>> fpa...@apache.org
>> 
>> Le 07/12/2020 à 20:29, Matt Pavlovich a écrit :
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> [PASSED] Ran full build with unit tests against the tag/5.15.14
>>> [PASSED] Ran internal test suite validating various configurations
>>> 
>>> Thanks JB!
>>> 
 On Dec 4, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
>> wrote:
 
 +1 (binding)
 
 Regards
 JB
 
> Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
>> écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take
>> includes fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> 
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>> <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>>> 
> 
> The Maven staging repository is:
> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
>> <
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
>>> 
> 
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
> 
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>> 
 
>> 

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Robbie Gemmell]

The commit email and below suggests you are manually adding the files
again and resending them upon check in? Please just do a remote
operation instead, it is much less error prone, and far faster too
given you dont need to resend the data. Example later.

The mail also shows you just removed 5.15.13 from the dist release
area before the website is updated, this is premature as it will have
broken a bunch of links to the checksums and signatures until the site
is actually updated to point those to the archive.


Remote operation example from the 5.x release guide page at
http://activemq.apache.org/release-guide :
# Example: svn cp -m "add files for activemq-5.15.1"
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.1
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.15.1

(The page is looking a bit stale these days, not sure if it has
changed any from the old wiki page at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ACTIVEMQ/Release+Guide)



On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 13:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>
> It’s in progress (got some connection issue yesterday evening).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 10 déc. 2020 à 14:00, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> >
> > The maven staging repo was promoted and the bits are listed on
> > central, but the source release / binary conveniences have not been
> > copied to the dist release area and so aren't yet started mirroring.
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 16:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> This vote passed with the following result:
> >>
> >> +1 (binding): JB Onofré, Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon
> >> +1 (non binding): Jamie Goodyear, François Papon
> >>
> >> Art started to review and I didn’t see his vote.
> >>
> >> I’m promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org 
> >> , I will update website and announce the release.
> >>
> >> Thanks all for your vote. I’m now moving forward on 5.16.1 and 5.17.0 
> >> preparation.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>> Le 8 déc. 2020 à 13:33, Christopher Shannon 
> >>>  a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Francois Papon 
> >>> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  +1 (non-binding)
> 
>  regards,
> 
>  François
>  fpa...@apache.org
> 
>  Le 07/12/2020 à 20:29, Matt Pavlovich a écrit :
> > +1
> >
> > [PASSED] Ran full build with unit tests against the tag/5.15.14
> > [PASSED] Ran internal test suite validating various configurations
> >
> > Thanks JB!
> >
> >> On Dec 4, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
>  wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>> Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
>  écrit :
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take
>  includes fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
> >>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> >>>
> >>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >>>
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>  <
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >
> >>>
> >>> The Maven staging repository is:
> >>>
>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
>  <
>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> >
> >>>
> >>> The dist staging repository is:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
> >>>
> >>> Git tag:
> >>> activemq-5.15.14
> >>>
> >>> Please vote to approve this release:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>>
> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks !
> >>> Regards
> >>> JB
> 
> >>
>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

It’s in progress (got some connection issue yesterday evening).

Regards
JB

> Le 10 déc. 2020 à 14:00, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> 
> The maven staging repo was promoted and the bits are listed on
> central, but the source release / binary conveniences have not been
> copied to the dist release area and so aren't yet started mirroring.
> 
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 16:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi guys,
>> 
>> This vote passed with the following result:
>> 
>> +1 (binding): JB Onofré, Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon
>> +1 (non binding): Jamie Goodyear, François Papon
>> 
>> Art started to review and I didn’t see his vote.
>> 
>> I’m promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org 
>> , I will update website and announce the release.
>> 
>> Thanks all for your vote. I’m now moving forward on 5.16.1 and 5.17.0 
>> preparation.
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 8 déc. 2020 à 13:33, Christopher Shannon 
>>>  a écrit :
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Francois Papon 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 +1 (non-binding)
 
 regards,
 
 François
 fpa...@apache.org
 
 Le 07/12/2020 à 20:29, Matt Pavlovich a écrit :
> +1
> 
> [PASSED] Ran full build with unit tests against the tag/5.15.14
> [PASSED] Ran internal test suite validating various configurations
> 
> Thanks JB!
> 
>> On Dec 4, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
 wrote:
>> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
 écrit :
>>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take
 includes fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
>>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>>> 
>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>> 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
 <
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> 
>>> 
>>> The Maven staging repository is:
>>> 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
 <
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> 
>>> 
>>> The dist staging repository is:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
>>> 
>>> Git tag:
>>> activemq-5.15.14
>>> 
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> Thanks !
>>> Regards
>>> JB
 
>> 

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Robbie Gemmell]

The maven staging repo was promoted and the bits are listed on
central, but the source release / binary conveniences have not been
copied to the dist release area and so aren't yet started mirroring.

On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 16:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> This vote passed with the following result:
>
> +1 (binding): JB Onofré, Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon
> +1 (non binding): Jamie Goodyear, François Papon
>
> Art started to review and I didn’t see his vote.
>
> I’m promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org 
> , I will update website and announce the release.
>
> Thanks all for your vote. I’m now moving forward on 5.16.1 and 5.17.0 
> preparation.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 8 déc. 2020 à 13:33, Christopher Shannon 
> >  a écrit :
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Francois Papon 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> François
> >> fpa...@apache.org
> >>
> >> Le 07/12/2020 à 20:29, Matt Pavlovich a écrit :
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> [PASSED] Ran full build with unit tests against the tag/5.15.14
> >>> [PASSED] Ran internal test suite validating various configurations
> >>>
> >>> Thanks JB!
> >>>
>  On Dec 4, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> >> wrote:
> 
>  +1 (binding)
> 
>  Regards
>  JB
> 
> > Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> >> écrit :
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take
> >> includes fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
> > This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> >
> > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >> <
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >>>
> >
> > The Maven staging repository is:
> >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> >> <
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> >>>
> >
> > The dist staging repository is:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
> >
> > Git tag:
> > activemq-5.15.14
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
> >>
>

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi guys,

This vote passed with the following result:

+1 (binding): JB Onofré, Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon
+1 (non binding): Jamie Goodyear, François Papon

Art started to review and I didn’t see his vote.

I’m promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org 
, I will update website and announce the release.

Thanks all for your vote. I’m now moving forward on 5.16.1 and 5.17.0 
preparation.

Regards
JB

> Le 8 déc. 2020 à 13:33, Christopher Shannon  
> a écrit :
> 
> +1
> 
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Francois Papon 
> wrote:
> 
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> François
>> fpa...@apache.org
>> 
>> Le 07/12/2020 à 20:29, Matt Pavlovich a écrit :
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> [PASSED] Ran full build with unit tests against the tag/5.15.14
>>> [PASSED] Ran internal test suite validating various configurations
>>> 
>>> Thanks JB!
>>> 
 On Dec 4, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
>> wrote:
 
 +1 (binding)
 
 Regards
 JB
 
> Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
>> écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take
>> includes fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> 
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>> <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>>> 
> 
> The Maven staging repository is:
> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
>> <
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
>>> 
> 
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
> 
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Christopher Shannon]

+1

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:21 PM Francois Papon 
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> regards,
>
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
>
> Le 07/12/2020 à 20:29, Matt Pavlovich a écrit :
> > +1
> >
> > [PASSED] Ran full build with unit tests against the tag/5.15.14
> > [PASSED] Ran internal test suite validating various configurations
> >
> > Thanks JB!
> >
> >> On Dec 4, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>> Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> écrit :
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take
> includes fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
> >>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> >>>
> >>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >
> >>>
> >>> The Maven staging repository is:
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> >
> >>>
> >>> The dist staging repository is:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
> >>>
> >>> Git tag:
> >>> activemq-5.15.14
> >>>
> >>> Please vote to approve this release:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>>
> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks !
> >>> Regards
> >>> JB
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Francois Papon]

+1 (non-binding)

regards,

François
fpa...@apache.org

Le 07/12/2020 à 20:29, Matt Pavlovich a écrit :
> +1 
>
> [PASSED] Ran full build with unit tests against the tag/5.15.14
> [PASSED] Ran internal test suite validating various configurations
>
> Thanks JB!
>
>> On Dec 4, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>> Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take includes 
>>> fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
>>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>>>
>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>>>  
>>> 
>>>
>>> The Maven staging repository is:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/ 
>>> 
>>>
>>> The dist staging repository is:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
>>> 
>>>
>>> Git tag:
>>> activemq-5.15.14
>>>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Thanks !
>>> Regards
>>> JB

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Matt Pavlovich]

+1 

[PASSED] Ran full build with unit tests against the tag/5.15.14
[PASSED] Ran internal test suite validating various configurations

Thanks JB!

> On Dec 4, 2020, at 6:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
>> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take includes 
>> fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>> 
>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> The Maven staging repository is:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/ 
>> 
>> 
>> The dist staging repository is:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
>> 
>> 
>> Git tag:
>> activemq-5.15.14
>> 
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> 
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> 
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Daniel Kulp]

+1

Dan


> On Dec 3, 2020, at 12:03 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take includes 
> fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> 
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>  
> 
> 
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/ 
> 
> 
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> 
> 
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org  - http://dankulp.com/blog 

Talend - http://talend.com 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Arthur Naseef]

I have started to run the build after updating the tag.

Thank you JB.

Art


On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:20 PM Jamie G.  wrote:

> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Jamie
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 9:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > > Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> écrit :
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take
> includes fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
> > > This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> > >
> > > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >
> > >
> > > The Maven staging repository is:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/
> >
> > >
> > > The dist staging repository is:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
> > >
> > > Git tag:
> > > activemq-5.15.14
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thanks !
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 9:11 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take includes 
> > fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
> > This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> >
> > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >  
> > 
> >
> > The Maven staging repository is:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/ 
> > 
> >
> > The dist staging repository is:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> > 
> >
> > Git tag:
> > activemq-5.15.14
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 3 déc. 2020 à 06:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take includes 
> fixes on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> 
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>  
> 
> 
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/ 
> 
> 
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> 
> 
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release (take #2)

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi everyone,

I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote. This second take includes fixes 
on jetty-realm file protocol and new updates.
This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.

Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
 


The Maven staging repository is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1221/ 


The dist staging repository is:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 


Git tag:
activemq-5.15.14

Please vote to approve this release:

[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

Thanks !
Regards
JB

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Arthur Naseef]

Oh nice.  I missed this earlier.  Thanks!

Art


On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 2:09 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:

> FYI, I fixed the issues (very quick fix) the InMemory test.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 2 déc. 2020 à 05:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
> >
> > Hi Art,
> >
> > Thanks for the update !
> >
> > Yeah, those tests are some of I would like to fix (they fail for quite
> long now, since at least 5.15.9).
> >
> > I think some tests should be removed because they don’t make sense
> anymore.
> >
> > I will take a look (I’m also improving the Karaf tests which are flaky).
> >
> > By the way, all is executed on Jenkins with the pipeline I created.
> However:
> > - a full ActiveMQ test is very long (~6h)
> > - the build often fails on Jenkins due to flaky tests
> >
> > So, I started to improve the situation, but it takes sometime and I
> don’t think we should hold releases for non accurate/flaky tests.
> >
> > Thanks again for your feedback, I’m moving forward on release (5.15.14
> take #2) and improving the build/tests.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >> Le 1 déc. 2020 à 22:46, Arthur Naseef  a écrit :
> >>
> >> So the ClassCastException happens in 5.15.13 and 5.15.10 when I run that
> >> test specifically.
> >> I suspect we have a case where the test class inheritance is causing
> >> confusion.  If so, then the fix here is to bypass the base-class test
> >> method.
> >>
> >> Can someone look at the test method
> >> testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded
> >> in JmsSchedulerTest.java and answer the question, "does this test method
> >> make sense for the in-memory scheduler?"  I suspect the in-memory
> scheduler
> >> just doesn't have a journal, so the test doesn't apply.
> >>
> >> Still no update on (2).
> >>
> >> Art
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:48 PM Arthur Naseef  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Looks like I'm finding 2 problems with the InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  1. The ClassCastException in one test, and
> >>>  2. "Didn't receive the message" problem in the other.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Digging into the ClassCastException, all the code appears to be
> unchanged
> >>> for at least 6 months.  Could this have been broken all this time?
> >>>
> >>> Haven't dug into the second problem yet.
> >>>
> >>> Art
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:03 PM Arthur Naseef  wrote:
> >>>
>  So it looks like my build only had 2 test failures.  The first we
>  discussed already.  The second is as follows:
> 
>  [INFO] Running
>  org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
>  [ERROR] Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
> elapsed:
>  41.993 s <<< FAILURE! - in
>  org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
>  [ERROR]
> 
> testScheduleFullRecoveryRestart(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
>  Time elapsed: 5.514 s  <<< FAILURE!
>  java.lang.AssertionError: Didn't receive the message
> 
>  [ERROR]
> 
> testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
>  Time elapsed: 0.005 s  <<< ERROR!
>  java.lang.ClassCastException:
>  org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemoryJobSchedulerStore
>  cannot be cast to
>  org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.scheduler.JobSchedulerStoreImpl'
> 
> 
>  I'm looking into it - please let me know if this is also a known
> issue.
> 
>  Art
> 
> 
>  On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:22 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
> j...@nanthrax.net>
>  wrote:
> 
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Due to an issue with the fix for AMQ-8045, I cancel this vote to
> prepare
> > a new one.
> >
> > Sorry about that. And thanks Art to find this.
> >
> > A new vote will start today.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> > écrit :
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> >> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> >>
> >> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >>
> >>
> >> The Maven staging repository is:
> >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> > <
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> >>
> >>
> >> The dist staging repository is:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
> >>
> >> Git tag:
> >> activemq-5.15.14
> >>
> >> Please vote to approve this 

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Arthur Naseef]

Makes sense.  Glad to hear the tests are run even if we have a few that
fail consistently.

When I did a few official AMQ builds, I learned to use "mvn -fn" to run
through the entire build, then go back and re-run the tests that failed.
At that time, running the tests more than once usually got them to pass,
and I accepted that result.

The more I looked at the ClassCastException in the
InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest, the more I think that test just doesn't apply.
If that's the case, we could use a simple means to disable the specific
test method when inherited - either by overriding the test method to do
nothing, or by adding a simple "instanceof" check in the base class.

Art


On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 2:09 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:

> FYI, I fixed the issues (very quick fix) the InMemory test.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 2 déc. 2020 à 05:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
> >
> > Hi Art,
> >
> > Thanks for the update !
> >
> > Yeah, those tests are some of I would like to fix (they fail for quite
> long now, since at least 5.15.9).
> >
> > I think some tests should be removed because they don’t make sense
> anymore.
> >
> > I will take a look (I’m also improving the Karaf tests which are flaky).
> >
> > By the way, all is executed on Jenkins with the pipeline I created.
> However:
> > - a full ActiveMQ test is very long (~6h)
> > - the build often fails on Jenkins due to flaky tests
> >
> > So, I started to improve the situation, but it takes sometime and I
> don’t think we should hold releases for non accurate/flaky tests.
> >
> > Thanks again for your feedback, I’m moving forward on release (5.15.14
> take #2) and improving the build/tests.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >> Le 1 déc. 2020 à 22:46, Arthur Naseef  a écrit :
> >>
> >> So the ClassCastException happens in 5.15.13 and 5.15.10 when I run that
> >> test specifically.
> >> I suspect we have a case where the test class inheritance is causing
> >> confusion.  If so, then the fix here is to bypass the base-class test
> >> method.
> >>
> >> Can someone look at the test method
> >> testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded
> >> in JmsSchedulerTest.java and answer the question, "does this test method
> >> make sense for the in-memory scheduler?"  I suspect the in-memory
> scheduler
> >> just doesn't have a journal, so the test doesn't apply.
> >>
> >> Still no update on (2).
> >>
> >> Art
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:48 PM Arthur Naseef  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Looks like I'm finding 2 problems with the InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  1. The ClassCastException in one test, and
> >>>  2. "Didn't receive the message" problem in the other.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Digging into the ClassCastException, all the code appears to be
> unchanged
> >>> for at least 6 months.  Could this have been broken all this time?
> >>>
> >>> Haven't dug into the second problem yet.
> >>>
> >>> Art
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:03 PM Arthur Naseef  wrote:
> >>>
>  So it looks like my build only had 2 test failures.  The first we
>  discussed already.  The second is as follows:
> 
>  [INFO] Running
>  org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
>  [ERROR] Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
> elapsed:
>  41.993 s <<< FAILURE! - in
>  org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
>  [ERROR]
> 
> testScheduleFullRecoveryRestart(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
>  Time elapsed: 5.514 s  <<< FAILURE!
>  java.lang.AssertionError: Didn't receive the message
> 
>  [ERROR]
> 
> testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
>  Time elapsed: 0.005 s  <<< ERROR!
>  java.lang.ClassCastException:
>  org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemoryJobSchedulerStore
>  cannot be cast to
>  org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.scheduler.JobSchedulerStoreImpl'
> 
> 
>  I'm looking into it - please let me know if this is also a known
> issue.
> 
>  Art
> 
> 
>  On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:22 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
> j...@nanthrax.net>
>  wrote:
> 
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Due to an issue with the fix for AMQ-8045, I cancel this vote to
> prepare
> > a new one.
> >
> > Sorry about that. And thanks Art to find this.
> >
> > A new vote will start today.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> > écrit :
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> >> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> >>
> >> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> > <
> >
> 

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

FYI, I fixed the issues (very quick fix) the InMemory test.

Regards
JB

> Le 2 déc. 2020 à 05:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
> 
> Hi Art,
> 
> Thanks for the update !
> 
> Yeah, those tests are some of I would like to fix (they fail for quite long 
> now, since at least 5.15.9).
> 
> I think some tests should be removed because they don’t make sense anymore.
> 
> I will take a look (I’m also improving the Karaf tests which are flaky).
> 
> By the way, all is executed on Jenkins with the pipeline I created. However:
> - a full ActiveMQ test is very long (~6h)
> - the build often fails on Jenkins due to flaky tests
> 
> So, I started to improve the situation, but it takes sometime and I don’t 
> think we should hold releases for non accurate/flaky tests.
> 
> Thanks again for your feedback, I’m moving forward on release (5.15.14 take 
> #2) and improving the build/tests.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> Le 1 déc. 2020 à 22:46, Arthur Naseef  a écrit :
>> 
>> So the ClassCastException happens in 5.15.13 and 5.15.10 when I run that
>> test specifically.
>> I suspect we have a case where the test class inheritance is causing
>> confusion.  If so, then the fix here is to bypass the base-class test
>> method.
>> 
>> Can someone look at the test method
>> testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded
>> in JmsSchedulerTest.java and answer the question, "does this test method
>> make sense for the in-memory scheduler?"  I suspect the in-memory scheduler
>> just doesn't have a journal, so the test doesn't apply.
>> 
>> Still no update on (2).
>> 
>> Art
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:48 PM Arthur Naseef  wrote:
>> 
>>> Looks like I'm finding 2 problems with the InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  1. The ClassCastException in one test, and
>>>  2. "Didn't receive the message" problem in the other.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Digging into the ClassCastException, all the code appears to be unchanged
>>> for at least 6 months.  Could this have been broken all this time?
>>> 
>>> Haven't dug into the second problem yet.
>>> 
>>> Art
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:03 PM Arthur Naseef  wrote:
>>> 
 So it looks like my build only had 2 test failures.  The first we
 discussed already.  The second is as follows:
 
 [INFO] Running
 org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
 [ERROR] Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
 41.993 s <<< FAILURE! - in
 org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
 [ERROR]
 testScheduleFullRecoveryRestart(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
 Time elapsed: 5.514 s  <<< FAILURE!
 java.lang.AssertionError: Didn't receive the message
 
 [ERROR]
 testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
 Time elapsed: 0.005 s  <<< ERROR!
 java.lang.ClassCastException:
 org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemoryJobSchedulerStore
 cannot be cast to
 org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.scheduler.JobSchedulerStoreImpl'
 
 
 I'm looking into it - please let me know if this is also a known issue.
 
 Art
 
 
 On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:22 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
 wrote:
 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Due to an issue with the fix for AMQ-8045, I cancel this vote to prepare
> a new one.
> 
> Sorry about that. And thanks Art to find this.
> 
> A new vote will start today.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
> écrit :
>> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>> 
>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>> 
>> 
>> The Maven staging repository is:
>> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
>> 
>> 
>> The dist staging repository is:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
>> 
>> Git tag:
>> activemq-5.15.14
>> 
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> 
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> 
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
> 
> 
> 

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi Art,

Thanks for the update !

Yeah, those tests are some of I would like to fix (they fail for quite long 
now, since at least 5.15.9).

I think some tests should be removed because they don’t make sense anymore.

I will take a look (I’m also improving the Karaf tests which are flaky).

By the way, all is executed on Jenkins with the pipeline I created. However:
- a full ActiveMQ test is very long (~6h)
- the build often fails on Jenkins due to flaky tests

So, I started to improve the situation, but it takes sometime and I don’t think 
we should hold releases for non accurate/flaky tests.

Thanks again for your feedback, I’m moving forward on release (5.15.14 take #2) 
and improving the build/tests.

Regards
JB

> Le 1 déc. 2020 à 22:46, Arthur Naseef  a écrit :
> 
> So the ClassCastException happens in 5.15.13 and 5.15.10 when I run that
> test specifically.
> I suspect we have a case where the test class inheritance is causing
> confusion.  If so, then the fix here is to bypass the base-class test
> method.
> 
> Can someone look at the test method
> testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded
> in JmsSchedulerTest.java and answer the question, "does this test method
> make sense for the in-memory scheduler?"  I suspect the in-memory scheduler
> just doesn't have a journal, so the test doesn't apply.
> 
> Still no update on (2).
> 
> Art
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:48 PM Arthur Naseef  wrote:
> 
>> Looks like I'm finding 2 problems with the InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest:
>> 
>> 
>>   1. The ClassCastException in one test, and
>>   2. "Didn't receive the message" problem in the other.
>> 
>> 
>> Digging into the ClassCastException, all the code appears to be unchanged
>> for at least 6 months.  Could this have been broken all this time?
>> 
>> Haven't dug into the second problem yet.
>> 
>> Art
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:03 PM Arthur Naseef  wrote:
>> 
>>> So it looks like my build only had 2 test failures.  The first we
>>> discussed already.  The second is as follows:
>>> 
>>> [INFO] Running
>>> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>>> 41.993 s <<< FAILURE! - in
>>> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
>>> [ERROR]
>>> testScheduleFullRecoveryRestart(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
>>> Time elapsed: 5.514 s  <<< FAILURE!
>>> java.lang.AssertionError: Didn't receive the message
>>> 
>>> [ERROR]
>>> testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
>>> Time elapsed: 0.005 s  <<< ERROR!
>>> java.lang.ClassCastException:
>>> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemoryJobSchedulerStore
>>> cannot be cast to
>>> org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.scheduler.JobSchedulerStoreImpl'
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'm looking into it - please let me know if this is also a known issue.
>>> 
>>> Art
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:22 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hi everyone,
 
 Due to an issue with the fix for AMQ-8045, I cancel this vote to prepare
 a new one.
 
 Sorry about that. And thanks Art to find this.
 
 A new vote will start today.
 
 Regards
 JB
 
> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
 écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> 
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
 <
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> 
> 
> The Maven staging repository is:
> 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
 <
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> 
> 
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
> 
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
 
 

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Arthur Naseef]

So the ClassCastException happens in 5.15.13 and 5.15.10 when I run that
test specifically.
I suspect we have a case where the test class inheritance is causing
confusion.  If so, then the fix here is to bypass the base-class test
method.

Can someone look at the test method
testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded
in JmsSchedulerTest.java and answer the question, "does this test method
make sense for the in-memory scheduler?"  I suspect the in-memory scheduler
just doesn't have a journal, so the test doesn't apply.

Still no update on (2).

Art


On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:48 PM Arthur Naseef  wrote:

> Looks like I'm finding 2 problems with the InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest:
>
>
>1. The ClassCastException in one test, and
>2. "Didn't receive the message" problem in the other.
>
>
> Digging into the ClassCastException, all the code appears to be unchanged
> for at least 6 months.  Could this have been broken all this time?
>
> Haven't dug into the second problem yet.
>
> Art
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:03 PM Arthur Naseef  wrote:
>
>> So it looks like my build only had 2 test failures.  The first we
>> discussed already.  The second is as follows:
>>
>> [INFO] Running
>> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
>> [ERROR] Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 41.993 s <<< FAILURE! - in
>> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
>> [ERROR]
>> testScheduleFullRecoveryRestart(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
>>  Time elapsed: 5.514 s  <<< FAILURE!
>> java.lang.AssertionError: Didn't receive the message
>>
>> [ERROR]
>> testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
>>  Time elapsed: 0.005 s  <<< ERROR!
>> java.lang.ClassCastException:
>> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemoryJobSchedulerStore
>> cannot be cast to
>> org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.scheduler.JobSchedulerStoreImpl'
>>
>>
>> I'm looking into it - please let me know if this is also a known issue.
>>
>> Art
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:22 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Due to an issue with the fix for AMQ-8045, I cancel this vote to prepare
>>> a new one.
>>>
>>> Sorry about that. And thanks Art to find this.
>>>
>>> A new vote will start today.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> > Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
>>> écrit :
>>> >
>>> > Hi everyone,
>>> >
>>> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
>>> > This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>>> >
>>> > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>>> <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The Maven staging repository is:
>>> >
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
>>> <
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > The dist staging repository is:
>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
>>> >
>>> > Git tag:
>>> > activemq-5.15.14
>>> >
>>> > Please vote to approve this release:
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> >
>>> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks !
>>> > Regards
>>> > JB
>>>
>>>

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Arthur Naseef]

Looks like I'm finding 2 problems with the InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest:


   1. The ClassCastException in one test, and
   2. "Didn't receive the message" problem in the other.


Digging into the ClassCastException, all the code appears to be unchanged
for at least 6 months.  Could this have been broken all this time?

Haven't dug into the second problem yet.

Art


On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:03 PM Arthur Naseef  wrote:

> So it looks like my build only had 2 test failures.  The first we
> discussed already.  The second is as follows:
>
> [INFO] Running
> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
> [ERROR] Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> 41.993 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
> [ERROR]
> testScheduleFullRecoveryRestart(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
>  Time elapsed: 5.514 s  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: Didn't receive the message
>
> [ERROR]
> testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
>  Time elapsed: 0.005 s  <<< ERROR!
> java.lang.ClassCastException:
> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemoryJobSchedulerStore
> cannot be cast to
> org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.scheduler.JobSchedulerStoreImpl'
>
>
> I'm looking into it - please let me know if this is also a known issue.
>
> Art
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:22 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Due to an issue with the fix for AMQ-8045, I cancel this vote to prepare
>> a new one.
>>
>> Sorry about that. And thanks Art to find this.
>>
>> A new vote will start today.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> > Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a
>> écrit :
>> >
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
>> > This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>> >
>> > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>> <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>> >
>> >
>> > The Maven staging repository is:
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
>> <
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
>> >
>> >
>> > The dist staging repository is:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
>> >
>> > Git tag:
>> > activemq-5.15.14
>> >
>> > Please vote to approve this release:
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> >
>> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> >
>> > Thanks !
>> > Regards
>> > JB
>>
>>

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Arthur Naseef]

So it looks like my build only had 2 test failures.  The first we discussed
already.  The second is as follows:

[INFO] Running
org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
[ERROR] Tests run: 8, Failures: 1, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
41.993 s <<< FAILURE! - in
org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest
[ERROR]
testScheduleFullRecoveryRestart(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
 Time elapsed: 5.514 s  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: Didn't receive the message

[ERROR]
testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded(org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest)
 Time elapsed: 0.005 s  <<< ERROR!
java.lang.ClassCastException:
org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemoryJobSchedulerStore
cannot be cast to
org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.scheduler.JobSchedulerStoreImpl'


I'm looking into it - please let me know if this is also a known issue.

Art


On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:22 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Due to an issue with the fix for AMQ-8045, I cancel this vote to prepare a
> new one.
>
> Sorry about that. And thanks Art to find this.
>
> A new vote will start today.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit
> :
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> > This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> >
> > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >
> >
> > The Maven staging repository is:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> >
> >
> > The dist staging repository is:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
> >
> > Git tag:
> > activemq-5.15.14
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
>
>

[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi everyone,

Due to an issue with the fix for AMQ-8045, I cancel this vote to prepare a new 
one.

Sorry about that. And thanks Art to find this.

A new vote will start today.

Regards
JB

> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> 
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>  
> 
> 
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ 
> 
> 
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> 
> 
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Arthur Naseef]

Ahh, thanks for letting me know.  I'll wait for the fix on that one and
look at the other tests.

Art


On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:11 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
wrote:

> Hi Arthur,
>
> That’s a real issue due a change introduce in the default jetty.xml to
> load the jetty-realm.
>
> My bad, I will fix that.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 1 déc. 2020 à 05:00, Arthur Naseef  a écrit :
> >
> > I'm running the build on an Ubuntu system and getting 4 test failures.  I
> > retried 1 and it repeated.
> >
> > I'll look at the failures more tomorrow.  Here are the errors from the
> test
> > I retried:
> >
> > [ERROR]
> >
> testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq-leveldb-replicating.xml](org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest)
> > Time elapsed: 1.222 s  <<< ERROR!
> > org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating
> > bean with name 'invokeStart' defined in file
> > [/home/art/work/activemq/src/activemq/assembly/target/conf/jetty.xml]:
> > Invocation of init method failed; nested exception is
> > java.lang.IllegalStateException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
> > file:target/conf/jetty-realm.properties
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1(BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.java:95)
> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException:
> > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
> file:target/conf/jetty-realm.properties
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1(BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.java:95)
> > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
> > file:target/conf/jetty-realm.properties
> > at
> >
> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1(BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.java:95)
> >
> > Art
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 5:37 AM Christopher Shannon <
> > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1,
> >>
> >> -verified checksum and gpg signature
> >> -ran a build and ran through smoke tests
> >> -ran broker from release to verify it starts
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 8:43 PM Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The issues I was noting were with the staged dist repo contents rather
> >>> than the maven repo. There is a helper script for prepping the dist
> >>> area contents inc verifying the gpg sig at
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 17:43, Matt Pavlovich 
> wrote:
> 
>  Robbie-
> 
>  Here is a release validation script:
> 
>  https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/587 <
> >>> https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/587>
> 
>  You can pass an arg to change the Maven repo.
> 
>  Currently it validates:
> 
>  1. Download tar.gz and zip files
>  2. Validates SHA1 and MD5
>  3. Extracts the zip and tar.gz
>  4. Cleans up after itself
> 
>  Next step would be to add the gpg signature validation
> 
>  Thanks,
>  Matt Pavlovich
> 
> > On Nov 27, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Robbie Gemmell <
> >> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >
> > The issues I noted (.md5 present, -bin files missing) dont appear to
> > be fixed for 5.15.14 yet? Still showing via the dist area HTTP view
> > and svn directly for me at least.
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 15:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >> It’s already fixed for the 5.15.14 release and I will push the fix
> >> on
> >>> the script.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:10, Robbie Gemmell 
> >>> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> I would fix the dist problems before starting another release
> >>> personally, so that any new voters can properly inspect things.
> >>>
> >>> Aside, I since saw that you only added the .md5 this morning along
> >>> with the .sha512 contents. I'm not sure how so many people managed
> >> to
> >>> vote for it without verifying the checksum, except perhaps everyone
> >>> just assumed someone else would do it. That's one reason it's good
> >> to
> >>> say what testing you actually did when voting, to help spot such
> >>> gaps.
> >>>
> >>> Robbie
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
> >> j...@nanthrax.net>
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on
> >>> 5.16.1 in the meantime.
> 
>  Thanks !
>  Regards
>  JB
> 
> > Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell <
> >> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> >>> a écrit :
> >
> > Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not
> >> around
> >>> to
> > see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
> > Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to
> >>> have
> > a release vote open unfortunately.
> >
> > I'd 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi Arthur,

That’s a real issue due a change introduce in the default jetty.xml to load the 
jetty-realm.

My bad, I will fix that.

Thanks !
Regards
JB

> Le 1 déc. 2020 à 05:00, Arthur Naseef  a écrit :
> 
> I'm running the build on an Ubuntu system and getting 4 test failures.  I
> retried 1 and it repeated.
> 
> I'll look at the failures more tomorrow.  Here are the errors from the test
> I retried:
> 
> [ERROR]
> testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq-leveldb-replicating.xml](org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest)
> Time elapsed: 1.222 s  <<< ERROR!
> org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating
> bean with name 'invokeStart' defined in file
> [/home/art/work/activemq/src/activemq/assembly/target/conf/jetty.xml]:
> Invocation of init method failed; nested exception is
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
> file:target/conf/jetty-realm.properties
> at
> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1(BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.java:95)
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException:
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: file:target/conf/jetty-realm.properties
> at
> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1(BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.java:95)
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
> file:target/conf/jetty-realm.properties
> at
> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1(BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.java:95)
> 
> Art
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 5:37 AM Christopher Shannon <
> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> +1,
>> 
>> -verified checksum and gpg signature
>> -ran a build and ran through smoke tests
>> -ran broker from release to verify it starts
>> 
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 8:43 PM Robbie Gemmell 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> The issues I was noting were with the staged dist repo contents rather
>>> than the maven repo. There is a helper script for prepping the dist
>>> area contents inc verifying the gpg sig at
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 17:43, Matt Pavlovich  wrote:
 
 Robbie-
 
 Here is a release validation script:
 
 https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/587 <
>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/587>
 
 You can pass an arg to change the Maven repo.
 
 Currently it validates:
 
 1. Download tar.gz and zip files
 2. Validates SHA1 and MD5
 3. Extracts the zip and tar.gz
 4. Cleans up after itself
 
 Next step would be to add the gpg signature validation
 
 Thanks,
 Matt Pavlovich
 
> On Nov 27, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Robbie Gemmell <
>> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
> 
> The issues I noted (.md5 present, -bin files missing) dont appear to
> be fixed for 5.15.14 yet? Still showing via the dist area HTTP view
> and svn directly for me at least.
> 
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 15:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
>>> wrote:
>> 
>> It’s already fixed for the 5.15.14 release and I will push the fix
>> on
>>> the script.
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:10, Robbie Gemmell 
>>> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> I would fix the dist problems before starting another release
>>> personally, so that any new voters can properly inspect things.
>>> 
>>> Aside, I since saw that you only added the .md5 this morning along
>>> with the .sha512 contents. I'm not sure how so many people managed
>> to
>>> vote for it without verifying the checksum, except perhaps everyone
>>> just assumed someone else would do it. That's one reason it's good
>> to
>>> say what testing you actually did when voting, to help spot such
>>> gaps.
>>> 
>>> Robbie
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
>> j...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
 
 Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on
>>> 5.16.1 in the meantime.
 
 Thanks !
 Regards
 JB
 
> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell <
>> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
>>> a écrit :
> 
> Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not
>> around
>>> to
> see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
> Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to
>>> have
> a release vote open unfortunately.
> 
> I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist
>> staging
> area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release
> which should be removed given they aren't meant to be
>> distributed.
> 
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
>>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Gently reminder about this vote.
>> 
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Arthur Naseef]

I'm running the build on an Ubuntu system and getting 4 test failures.  I
retried 1 and it repeated.

I'll look at the failures more tomorrow.  Here are the errors from the test
I retried:

[ERROR]
testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq-leveldb-replicating.xml](org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest)
 Time elapsed: 1.222 s  <<< ERROR!
org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating
bean with name 'invokeStart' defined in file
[/home/art/work/activemq/src/activemq/assembly/target/conf/jetty.xml]:
Invocation of init method failed; nested exception is
java.lang.IllegalStateException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
file:target/conf/jetty-realm.properties
at
org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1(BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.java:95)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: file:target/conf/jetty-realm.properties
at
org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1(BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.java:95)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
file:target/conf/jetty-realm.properties
at
org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1(BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.java:95)

Art


On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 5:37 AM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1,
>
> -verified checksum and gpg signature
> -ran a build and ran through smoke tests
> -ran broker from release to verify it starts
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 8:43 PM Robbie Gemmell 
> wrote:
>
> > The issues I was noting were with the staged dist repo contents rather
> > than the maven repo. There is a helper script for prepping the dist
> > area contents inc verifying the gpg sig at
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 17:43, Matt Pavlovich  wrote:
> > >
> > > Robbie-
> > >
> > > Here is a release validation script:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/587 <
> > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/587>
> > >
> > > You can pass an arg to change the Maven repo.
> > >
> > > Currently it validates:
> > >
> > > 1. Download tar.gz and zip files
> > > 2. Validates SHA1 and MD5
> > > 3. Extracts the zip and tar.gz
> > > 4. Cleans up after itself
> > >
> > > Next step would be to add the gpg signature validation
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matt Pavlovich
> > >
> > > > On Nov 27, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The issues I noted (.md5 present, -bin files missing) dont appear to
> > > > be fixed for 5.15.14 yet? Still showing via the dist area HTTP view
> > > > and svn directly for me at least.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 15:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> It’s already fixed for the 5.15.14 release and I will push the fix
> on
> > the script.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> JB
> > > >>
> > > >>> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:10, Robbie Gemmell 
> > a écrit :
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I would fix the dist problems before starting another release
> > > >>> personally, so that any new voters can properly inspect things.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Aside, I since saw that you only added the .md5 this morning along
> > > >>> with the .sha512 contents. I'm not sure how so many people managed
> to
> > > >>> vote for it without verifying the checksum, except perhaps everyone
> > > >>> just assumed someone else would do it. That's one reason it's good
> to
> > > >>> say what testing you actually did when voting, to help spot such
> > gaps.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Robbie
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
> j...@nanthrax.net>
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > >  Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on
> > 5.16.1 in the meantime.
> > > 
> > >  Thanks !
> > >  Regards
> > >  JB
> > > 
> > > > Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell <
> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
> > a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not
> around
> > to
> > > > see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
> > > > Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to
> > have
> > > > a release vote open unfortunately.
> > > >
> > > > I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist
> staging
> > > > area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release
> > > > which should be removed given they aren't meant to be
> distributed.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
> > j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Gently reminder about this vote.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks !
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> JB
> > > >>
> > > >>> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  >
> > a écrit :
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi everyone,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Christopher Shannon]

+1,

-verified checksum and gpg signature
-ran a build and ran through smoke tests
-ran broker from release to verify it starts

On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 8:43 PM Robbie Gemmell 
wrote:

> The issues I was noting were with the staged dist repo contents rather
> than the maven repo. There is a helper script for prepping the dist
> area contents inc verifying the gpg sig at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/
>
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 17:43, Matt Pavlovich  wrote:
> >
> > Robbie-
> >
> > Here is a release validation script:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/587 <
> https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/587>
> >
> > You can pass an arg to change the Maven repo.
> >
> > Currently it validates:
> >
> > 1. Download tar.gz and zip files
> > 2. Validates SHA1 and MD5
> > 3. Extracts the zip and tar.gz
> > 4. Cleans up after itself
> >
> > Next step would be to add the gpg signature validation
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matt Pavlovich
> >
> > > On Nov 27, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Robbie Gemmell 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > The issues I noted (.md5 present, -bin files missing) dont appear to
> > > be fixed for 5.15.14 yet? Still showing via the dist area HTTP view
> > > and svn directly for me at least.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 15:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> It’s already fixed for the 5.15.14 release and I will push the fix on
> the script.
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> JB
> > >>
> > >>> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:10, Robbie Gemmell 
> a écrit :
> > >>>
> > >>> I would fix the dist problems before starting another release
> > >>> personally, so that any new voters can properly inspect things.
> > >>>
> > >>> Aside, I since saw that you only added the .md5 this morning along
> > >>> with the .sha512 contents. I'm not sure how so many people managed to
> > >>> vote for it without verifying the checksum, except perhaps everyone
> > >>> just assumed someone else would do it. That's one reason it's good to
> > >>> say what testing you actually did when voting, to help spot such
> gaps.
> > >>>
> > >>> Robbie
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> wrote:
> > 
> >  Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on
> 5.16.1 in the meantime.
> > 
> >  Thanks !
> >  Regards
> >  JB
> > 
> > > Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell 
> a écrit :
> > >
> > > Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not around
> to
> > > see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
> > > Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to
> have
> > > a release vote open unfortunately.
> > >
> > > I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist staging
> > > area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release
> > > which should be removed given they aren't meant to be distributed.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <
> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Gently reminder about this vote.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks !
> > >> Regards
> > >> JB
> > >>
> > >>> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> a écrit :
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>
> > >>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> > >>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> > >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >
> > >>>
> > >>> The Maven staging repository is:
> > >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> >
> > >>>
> > >>> The dist staging repository is:
> > >>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
> > >>>
> > >>> Git tag:
> > >>> activemq-5.15.14
> > >>>
> > >>> Please vote to approve this release:
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > >>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific
> comments)
> > >>>
> > >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks !
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> JB
> > >>
> > 
> > >>
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Robbie Gemmell]

The issues I was noting were with the staged dist repo contents rather
than the maven repo. There is a helper script for prepping the dist
area contents inc verifying the gpg sig at
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/

On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 17:43, Matt Pavlovich  wrote:
>
> Robbie-
>
> Here is a release validation script:
>
> https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/587 
> 
>
> You can pass an arg to change the Maven repo.
>
> Currently it validates:
>
> 1. Download tar.gz and zip files
> 2. Validates SHA1 and MD5
> 3. Extracts the zip and tar.gz
> 4. Cleans up after itself
>
> Next step would be to add the gpg signature validation
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Pavlovich
>
> > On Nov 27, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Robbie Gemmell  
> > wrote:
> >
> > The issues I noted (.md5 present, -bin files missing) dont appear to
> > be fixed for 5.15.14 yet? Still showing via the dist area HTTP view
> > and svn directly for me at least.
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 15:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> It’s already fixed for the 5.15.14 release and I will push the fix on the 
> >> script.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:10, Robbie Gemmell  a 
> >>> écrit :
> >>>
> >>> I would fix the dist problems before starting another release
> >>> personally, so that any new voters can properly inspect things.
> >>>
> >>> Aside, I since saw that you only added the .md5 this morning along
> >>> with the .sha512 contents. I'm not sure how so many people managed to
> >>> vote for it without verifying the checksum, except perhaps everyone
> >>> just assumed someone else would do it. That's one reason it's good to
> >>> say what testing you actually did when voting, to help spot such gaps.
> >>>
> >>> Robbie
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on 
>  5.16.1 in the meantime.
> 
>  Thanks !
>  Regards
>  JB
> 
> > Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell  a 
> > écrit :
> >
> > Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not around to
> > see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
> > Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to have
> > a release vote open unfortunately.
> >
> > I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist staging
> > area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release
> > which should be removed given they aren't meant to be distributed.
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Gently reminder about this vote.
> >>
> >> Thanks !
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a 
> >>> écrit :
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> >>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> >>>
> >>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >>>  
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> The Maven staging repository is:
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> >>>  
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> The dist staging repository is:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> Git tag:
> >>> activemq-5.15.14
> >>>
> >>> Please vote to approve this release:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>>
> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks !
> >>> Regards
> >>> JB
> >>
> 
> >>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Robbie Gemmell]

Yep, looks better now.

On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 16:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>
> NB: upload is still on the way, it should be OK in 10mn or so.
>
> > Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:56, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> >
> > The issues I noted (.md5 present, -bin files missing) dont appear to
> > be fixed for 5.15.14 yet? Still showing via the dist area HTTP view
> > and svn directly for me at least.
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 15:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> It’s already fixed for the 5.15.14 release and I will push the fix on the 
> >> script.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:10, Robbie Gemmell  a 
> >>> écrit :
> >>>
> >>> I would fix the dist problems before starting another release
> >>> personally, so that any new voters can properly inspect things.
> >>>
> >>> Aside, I since saw that you only added the .md5 this morning along
> >>> with the .sha512 contents. I'm not sure how so many people managed to
> >>> vote for it without verifying the checksum, except perhaps everyone
> >>> just assumed someone else would do it. That's one reason it's good to
> >>> say what testing you actually did when voting, to help spot such gaps.
> >>>
> >>> Robbie
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on 
>  5.16.1 in the meantime.
> 
>  Thanks !
>  Regards
>  JB
> 
> > Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell  a 
> > écrit :
> >
> > Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not around to
> > see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
> > Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to have
> > a release vote open unfortunately.
> >
> > I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist staging
> > area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release
> > which should be removed given they aren't meant to be distributed.
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Gently reminder about this vote.
> >>
> >> Thanks !
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a 
> >>> écrit :
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> >>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> >>>
> >>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >>>  
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> The Maven staging repository is:
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> >>>  
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> The dist staging repository is:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> Git tag:
> >>> activemq-5.15.14
> >>>
> >>> Please vote to approve this release:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>>
> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks !
> >>> Regards
> >>> JB
> >>
> 
> >>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Matt Pavlovich]

Robbie-

Here is a release validation script:

https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/587 


You can pass an arg to change the Maven repo. 

Currently it validates:

1. Download tar.gz and zip files
2. Validates SHA1 and MD5
3. Extracts the zip and tar.gz
4. Cleans up after itself

Next step would be to add the gpg signature validation

Thanks,
Matt Pavlovich

> On Nov 27, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Robbie Gemmell  wrote:
> 
> The issues I noted (.md5 present, -bin files missing) dont appear to
> be fixed for 5.15.14 yet? Still showing via the dist area HTTP view
> and svn directly for me at least.
> 
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 15:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>> 
>> It’s already fixed for the 5.15.14 release and I will push the fix on the 
>> script.
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:10, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
>>> 
>>> I would fix the dist problems before starting another release
>>> personally, so that any new voters can properly inspect things.
>>> 
>>> Aside, I since saw that you only added the .md5 this morning along
>>> with the .sha512 contents. I'm not sure how so many people managed to
>>> vote for it without verifying the checksum, except perhaps everyone
>>> just assumed someone else would do it. That's one reason it's good to
>>> say what testing you actually did when voting, to help spot such gaps.
>>> 
>>> Robbie
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
>>> wrote:
 
 Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on 5.16.1 
 in the meantime.
 
 Thanks !
 Regards
 JB
 
> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell  a 
> écrit :
> 
> Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not around to
> see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
> Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to have
> a release vote open unfortunately.
> 
> I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist staging
> area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release
> which should be removed given they aren't meant to be distributed.
> 
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> wrote:
>> 
>> Gently reminder about this vote.
>> 
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a 
>>> écrit :
>>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
>>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>>> 
>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The Maven staging repository is:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The dist staging repository is:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Git tag:
>>> activemq-5.15.14
>>> 
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> Thanks !
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>> 
 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

NB: upload is still on the way, it should be OK in 10mn or so.

> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:56, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> 
> The issues I noted (.md5 present, -bin files missing) dont appear to
> be fixed for 5.15.14 yet? Still showing via the dist area HTTP view
> and svn directly for me at least.
> 
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 15:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>> 
>> It’s already fixed for the 5.15.14 release and I will push the fix on the 
>> script.
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:10, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
>>> 
>>> I would fix the dist problems before starting another release
>>> personally, so that any new voters can properly inspect things.
>>> 
>>> Aside, I since saw that you only added the .md5 this morning along
>>> with the .sha512 contents. I'm not sure how so many people managed to
>>> vote for it without verifying the checksum, except perhaps everyone
>>> just assumed someone else would do it. That's one reason it's good to
>>> say what testing you actually did when voting, to help spot such gaps.
>>> 
>>> Robbie
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
>>> wrote:
 
 Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on 5.16.1 
 in the meantime.
 
 Thanks !
 Regards
 JB
 
> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell  a 
> écrit :
> 
> Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not around to
> see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
> Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to have
> a release vote open unfortunately.
> 
> I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist staging
> area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release
> which should be removed given they aren't meant to be distributed.
> 
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> wrote:
>> 
>> Gently reminder about this vote.
>> 
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a 
>>> écrit :
>>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
>>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>>> 
>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The Maven staging repository is:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The dist staging repository is:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Git tag:
>>> activemq-5.15.14
>>> 
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> Thanks !
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>> 
 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

No problem at all ! And thanks for your feedback. It helps !

I will keep on fixing flaky tests ;)

Regards
JB

> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 17:08, Matt Pavlovich  a écrit :
> 
> JB-
> 
> Thanks for all your efforts. In no way was my response intended to be 
> critical— the hope was to be informative if others were seeing the same. 
> 
> The fact that you have the code base down to *only* 7 failing tests is 
> remarkable! I should have indicated that in my note =).
> 
> -Matt
> 
>> On Nov 25, 2020, at 10:59 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks for the feedback Matt. We have lot of flacky tests. I fixed some but 
>> others are still there. I will keep on fixing ;)
>> 
>>> Le 25 nov. 2020 à 19:16, Matt Pavlovich  a écrit :
>>> 
>>> +1 
>>> 
>>> Full build and unit tests executed on CentOS using JDK 1.8u221
>>> 
>>> 7 unit test failures:
>>> 
>>> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest.testScheduleFullRecoveryRestart
>>>  
>>> 
>>> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest.testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded
>>>  
>>> 
>>> org.apache.activemq.bugs.AMQ7118Test.testCompaction 
>>> 
>>> org.apache.activemq.blob.BlobTransferPolicyUriTest.testDefaultDownlaodStrategySensibleError
>>>  
>>> 
>>> org.apache.activemq.blob.BlobTransferPolicyUriTest.testDefaultUploadStrategySensibleError
>>>  
>>> 
>>> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq-leveldb-replicating.xml]
>>>  
>>> 
>>> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq-stomp.xml]
>>>  
>>> 
>>> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq.xml]
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On Nov 24, 2020, at 1:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
 wrote:
 
 Hi everyone,
 
 I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
 This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
 
 Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
  
 
 
 The Maven staging repository is:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ 
 
 
 The dist staging repository is:
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
 
 
 Git tag:
 activemq-5.15.14
 
 Please vote to approve this release:
 
 [ ] +1 Approve the release
 [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
 
 This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
 
 Thanks !
 Regards
 JB
>>> 
>> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

My bad, I forgot svn commit ;)

It should be OK now.

I will check the prepare-release.sh (for the empty sha512 file).

Regards
JB

> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:56, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> 
> The issues I noted (.md5 present, -bin files missing) dont appear to
> be fixed for 5.15.14 yet? Still showing via the dist area HTTP view
> and svn directly for me at least.
> 
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 15:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>> 
>> It’s already fixed for the 5.15.14 release and I will push the fix on the 
>> script.
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:10, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
>>> 
>>> I would fix the dist problems before starting another release
>>> personally, so that any new voters can properly inspect things.
>>> 
>>> Aside, I since saw that you only added the .md5 this morning along
>>> with the .sha512 contents. I'm not sure how so many people managed to
>>> vote for it without verifying the checksum, except perhaps everyone
>>> just assumed someone else would do it. That's one reason it's good to
>>> say what testing you actually did when voting, to help spot such gaps.
>>> 
>>> Robbie
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
>>> wrote:
 
 Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on 5.16.1 
 in the meantime.
 
 Thanks !
 Regards
 JB
 
> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell  a 
> écrit :
> 
> Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not around to
> see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
> Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to have
> a release vote open unfortunately.
> 
> I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist staging
> area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release
> which should be removed given they aren't meant to be distributed.
> 
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> wrote:
>> 
>> Gently reminder about this vote.
>> 
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a 
>>> écrit :
>>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
>>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>>> 
>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The Maven staging repository is:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The dist staging repository is:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Git tag:
>>> activemq-5.15.14
>>> 
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> Thanks !
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>> 
 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Matt Pavlovich]

JB-

Thanks for all your efforts. In no way was my response intended to be critical— 
the hope was to be informative if others were seeing the same. 

The fact that you have the code base down to *only* 7 failing tests is 
remarkable! I should have indicated that in my note =).

-Matt

> On Nov 25, 2020, at 10:59 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the feedback Matt. We have lot of flacky tests. I fixed some but 
> others are still there. I will keep on fixing ;)
> 
>> Le 25 nov. 2020 à 19:16, Matt Pavlovich  a écrit :
>> 
>> +1 
>> 
>> Full build and unit tests executed on CentOS using JDK 1.8u221
>> 
>> 7 unit test failures:
>> 
>> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest.testScheduleFullRecoveryRestart
>>  
>> 
>> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest.testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded
>>  
>> 
>> org.apache.activemq.bugs.AMQ7118Test.testCompaction 
>> 
>> org.apache.activemq.blob.BlobTransferPolicyUriTest.testDefaultDownlaodStrategySensibleError
>>  
>> 
>> org.apache.activemq.blob.BlobTransferPolicyUriTest.testDefaultUploadStrategySensibleError
>>  
>> 
>> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq-leveldb-replicating.xml]
>>  
>> 
>> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq-stomp.xml]
>>  
>> 
>> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq.xml]
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 24, 2020, at 1:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
>>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>>> 
>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The Maven staging repository is:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The dist staging repository is:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Git tag:
>>> activemq-5.15.14
>>> 
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> Thanks !
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Robbie Gemmell]

The issues I noted (.md5 present, -bin files missing) dont appear to
be fixed for 5.15.14 yet? Still showing via the dist area HTTP view
and svn directly for me at least.

On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 15:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>
> It’s already fixed for the 5.15.14 release and I will push the fix on the 
> script.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:10, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> >
> > I would fix the dist problems before starting another release
> > personally, so that any new voters can properly inspect things.
> >
> > Aside, I since saw that you only added the .md5 this morning along
> > with the .sha512 contents. I'm not sure how so many people managed to
> > vote for it without verifying the checksum, except perhaps everyone
> > just assumed someone else would do it. That's one reason it's good to
> > say what testing you actually did when voting, to help spot such gaps.
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on 5.16.1 
> >> in the meantime.
> >>
> >> Thanks !
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell  a 
> >>> écrit :
> >>>
> >>> Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not around to
> >>> see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
> >>> Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to have
> >>> a release vote open unfortunately.
> >>>
> >>> I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist staging
> >>> area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release
> >>> which should be removed given they aren't meant to be distributed.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> >>> wrote:
> 
>  Gently reminder about this vote.
> 
>  Thanks !
>  Regards
>  JB
> 
> > Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a 
> > écrit :
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> > This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> >
> > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >  
> > 
> >
> > The Maven staging repository is:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> >  
> > 
> >
> > The dist staging repository is:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> > 
> >
> > Git tag:
> > activemq-5.15.14
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
> 
> >>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

It’s already fixed for the 5.15.14 release and I will push the fix on the 
script.

Regards
JB

> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 16:10, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> 
> I would fix the dist problems before starting another release
> personally, so that any new voters can properly inspect things.
> 
> Aside, I since saw that you only added the .md5 this morning along
> with the .sha512 contents. I'm not sure how so many people managed to
> vote for it without verifying the checksum, except perhaps everyone
> just assumed someone else would do it. That's one reason it's good to
> say what testing you actually did when voting, to help spot such gaps.
> 
> Robbie
> 
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>> 
>> Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on 5.16.1 in 
>> the meantime.
>> 
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not around to
>>> see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
>>> Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to have
>>> a release vote open unfortunately.
>>> 
>>> I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist staging
>>> area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release
>>> which should be removed given they aren't meant to be distributed.
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
>>> wrote:
 
 Gently reminder about this vote.
 
 Thanks !
 Regards
 JB
 
> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit 
> :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> 
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>  
> 
> 
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
>  
> 
> 
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> 
> 
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Robbie Gemmell]

I would fix the dist problems before starting another release
personally, so that any new voters can properly inspect things.

Aside, I since saw that you only added the .md5 this morning along
with the .sha512 contents. I'm not sure how so many people managed to
vote for it without verifying the checksum, except perhaps everyone
just assumed someone else would do it. That's one reason it's good to
say what testing you actually did when voting, to help spot such gaps.

Robbie

On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 12:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>
> Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on 5.16.1 in 
> the meantime.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> >
> > Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not around to
> > see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
> > Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to have
> > a release vote open unfortunately.
> >
> > I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist staging
> > area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release
> > which should be removed given they aren't meant to be distributed.
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Gently reminder about this vote.
> >>
> >> Thanks !
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit 
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> >>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> >>>
> >>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >>>  
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> The Maven staging repository is:
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> >>>  
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> The dist staging repository is:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> Git tag:
> >>> activemq-5.15.14
> >>>
> >>> Please vote to approve this release:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>>
> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks !
> >>> Regards
> >>> JB
> >>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Yeah I know ;) Not a problem. We can wait ! I will move forward on 5.16.1 in 
the meantime.

Thanks !
Regards
JB

> Le 27 nov. 2020 à 12:48, Robbie Gemmell  a écrit :
> 
> Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not around to
> see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
> Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to have
> a release vote open unfortunately.
> 
> I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist staging
> area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release
> which should be removed given they aren't meant to be distributed.
> 
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>> 
>> Gently reminder about this vote.
>> 
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
>>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>>> 
>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The Maven staging repository is:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The dist staging repository is:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Git tag:
>>> activemq-5.15.14
>>> 
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> Thanks !
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Robbie Gemmell]

Many of the people you are looking to remind are likely not around to
see it, being on vacation either for or just around the US
Thanksgiving. It's probably the second worst point of the year to have
a release vote open unfortunately.

I'd note that the binary archives are missing from the dist staging
area, and there is an MD5 checksum present for the source release
which should be removed given they aren't meant to be distributed.

On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 04:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>
> Gently reminder about this vote.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> > This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> >
> > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >  
> > 
> >
> > The Maven staging repository is:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ 
> > 
> >
> > The dist staging repository is:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> > 
> >
> > Git tag:
> > activemq-5.15.14
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Gently reminder about this vote.

Thanks !
Regards
JB

> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> 
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>  
> 
> 
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ 
> 
> 
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> 
> 
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Fraser]

+1

Regards,
FC

On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 07:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
> >
>
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/
> >
>
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/>
>
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 24 nov. 2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> 
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>  
> 
> 
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ 
> 
> 
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> 
> 
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Thanks for the feedback Matt. We have lot of flacky tests. I fixed some but 
others are still there. I will keep on fixing ;)

> Le 25 nov. 2020 à 19:16, Matt Pavlovich  a écrit :
> 
> +1 
> 
> Full build and unit tests executed on CentOS using JDK 1.8u221
> 
> 7 unit test failures:
> 
> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest.testScheduleFullRecoveryRestart
>  
> 
> org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest.testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded
>  
> 
> org.apache.activemq.bugs.AMQ7118Test.testCompaction 
> 
> org.apache.activemq.blob.BlobTransferPolicyUriTest.testDefaultDownlaodStrategySensibleError
>  
> 
> org.apache.activemq.blob.BlobTransferPolicyUriTest.testDefaultUploadStrategySensibleError
>  
> 
> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq-leveldb-replicating.xml]
>  
> 
> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq-stomp.xml]
>  
> 
> org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq.xml]
>  
> 
> 
> 
>> On Nov 24, 2020, at 1:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
>> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>> 
>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> The Maven staging repository is:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ 
>> 
>> 
>> The dist staging repository is:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
>> 
>> 
>> Git tag:
>> activemq-5.15.14
>> 
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> 
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> 
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Matt Pavlovich]

+1 

Full build and unit tests executed on CentOS using JDK 1.8u221

7 unit test failures:

org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest.testScheduleFullRecoveryRestart
 

org.apache.activemq.broker.scheduler.memory.InMemeoryJmsSchedulerTest.testUpdatesAppliedToIndexBeforeJournalShouldBeDiscarded
 

org.apache.activemq.bugs.AMQ7118Test.testCompaction 

org.apache.activemq.blob.BlobTransferPolicyUriTest.testDefaultDownlaodStrategySensibleError
 

org.apache.activemq.blob.BlobTransferPolicyUriTest.testDefaultUploadStrategySensibleError
 

org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq-leveldb-replicating.xml]
 

org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq-stomp.xml]
 

org.apache.activemq.config.BrokerXmlConfigStartTest.testStartBrokerUsingXmlConfig1[activemq.xml]
 



> On Nov 24, 2020, at 1:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> 
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>  
> 
> 
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ 
> 
> 
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> 
> 
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Francois Papon]

+1 (non-binding)

Thanks JB!

regards,

François
fpa...@apache.org

Le 24/11/2020 à 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>  
> 
>
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ 
> 
>
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> 
>
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Daniel Kulp]

+1

Dan


> On Nov 24, 2020, at 2:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
> 
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>  
> 
> 
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ 
> 
> 
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> 
> 
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org  - http://dankulp.com/blog 

Talend - http://talend.com 

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jamie G.]

+1

Cheers,
Jamie

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:30 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre  wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
> This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.
>
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
>  
> 
>
> The Maven staging repository is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ 
> 
>
> The dist staging repository is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 
> 
>
> Git tag:
> activemq-5.15.14
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi everyone,

I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.14 to your vote.
This release includes CVE related updates and bug fixes.

Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12348294
 


The Maven staging repository is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1220/ 


The dist staging repository is:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.14/ 


Git tag:
activemq-5.15.14

Please vote to approve this release:

[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

Thanks !
Regards
JB