Podling report

[Felix Cheung]

Hi!

Any volunteer to draft the report?

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/July2020

Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - August 2020

[Felix Cheung]

Any one could take a shot at the report?


From: jmcl...@apache.org 
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 1:22:06 AM
To: d...@age.incubator.apache.org 
Subject: Podling Age Report Reminder - August 2020

Dear podling,

This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.

The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 August 2020.
The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
submission (Wed, August 05).

Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
meeting.

Candidate names should not be made public before people are actually
elected, so please do not include the names of potential committers or
PPMC members in your report.

Thanks,

The Apache Incubator PMC

Submitting your Report

--

Your report should contain the following:

*   Your project name
*   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
the project or necessarily of its field
*   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
towards graduation.
*   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
aware of
*   How has the community developed since the last report
*   How has the project developed since the last report.
*   How does the podling rate their own maturity.

This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/August2020

Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
this page is created from a template.

Note: The format of the report has changed to use markdown.

Mentors
---

Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
for the Incubator PMC.

Incubator PMC

Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - September 2020

[Felix Cheung]

Any volunteers to write this report?


From: jmcl...@apache.org 
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 6:55:20 PM
To: d...@age.incubator.apache.org 
Subject: Podling Age Report Reminder - September 2020

Dear podling,

This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.

The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 September 2020.
The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
submission (Wed, September 02).

Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
meeting.

Candidate names should not be made public before people are actually
elected, so please do not include the names of potential committers or
PPMC members in your report.

Thanks,

The Apache Incubator PMC

Submitting your Report

--

Your report should contain the following:

*   Your project name
*   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
the project or necessarily of its field
*   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
towards graduation.
*   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
aware of
*   How has the community developed since the last report
*   How has the project developed since the last report.
*   How does the podling rate their own maturity.

This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/September2020

Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
this page is created from a template.

Note: The format of the report has changed to use markdown.

Mentors
---

Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
for the Incubator PMC.

Incubator PMC

Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - December 2020

[Felix Cheung]

Reminder:



From: jmcl...@apache.org 
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2020 4:01:34 PM
To: d...@age.incubator.apache.org 
Subject: Podling Age Report Reminder - December 2020

Dear podling,

This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.

The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 December 2020.
The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
submission (Wed, December 02).

Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
meeting.

Candidate names should not be made public before people are actually
elected, so please do not include the names of potential committers or
PPMC members in your report.

Thanks,

The Apache Incubator PMC

Submitting your Report

--

Your report should contain the following:

*   Your project name
*   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
the project or necessarily of its field
*   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
towards graduation.
*   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
aware of
*   How has the community developed since the last report
*   How has the project developed since the last report.
*   How does the podling rate their own maturity.

This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/December2020

Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
this page is created from a template.

Note: The format of the report has changed to use markdown.

Mentors
---

Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
for the Incubator PMC.

Incubator PMC

Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

[Felix Cheung]

Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be just 
the mentor.

A good vote thread might be like:
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html

1. md5 - should not include

2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a 
apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip
 and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/
This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file.

3.
I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers

4.
openCypher/openCypher9.pdf
maybe don't include this in source? where is the file from? is there a possible 
licensing issue?

5,
KEYS.txt
don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be in git repo



From: Eya Badal 
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

Dear Mentors,

We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the following 
link:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/

Could you please review and approve.

Best regards,
Eya

Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

[Felix Cheung]

Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content.



From: Eya Badal 
Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback.
>Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list and ask 
>everyone to vote?


On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung  wrote:
> Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be 
> just the mentor.
>
> A good vote thread might be like:
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html
>
> 1. md5 - should not include
>I will remove this file.
>
> 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a 
> apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip
>  and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/
> This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file.
>
>I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make sure it is 
>consistent.
>
> 3.
> I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP
> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers
>Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer?
>
> 4.
> openCypher/openCypher9.pdf
> maybe don't include this in the source? where is the file from? is there a 
> possible licensing issue?
>
>It won't be any licensing issue since OpenCypher is based on Apache License as 
>well which is included in the licensing file.
> 5,
> KEYS.txt
> don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be in git repo
> I will remove this as well.
>
>Thank you again and please advise if you have any other suggestions or 
>thoughts.
> 
>
> From: Eya Badal 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM
> To: dev@age.apache.org 
> Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE
>
> Dear Mentors,
>
> We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the following 
> link:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/
>
> Could you please review and approve.
>
> Best regards,
> Eya
>

Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

[Felix Cheung]

Thanks for the updates.

For disclaimer: it is your first release, so it is likely something is off (for 
example, you have a dependency that is not compatible with Apache license and 
normally will not be possible to release with) it is just easier to get through 
the process. The community can decide if you want to go this route or not.

For OpenCypher - if it is a public spec from OpenCypher, it will be best not to 
include a file but link to it. Even if license compatible it is best not to 
include files, source code etc from another project because then proper 
attribution should be there (typically in the LICENSE or NOTICE file)

See bundled dependencies here https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html



From: Eya Badal 
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 7:32 AM
To: dev@age.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

Hi Felix,

I just want to mention some points.

1-I did update the svn with new files. The unzipping to different names is 
fixed now.
2-I also removed the md5 file and KEYS file from the svn and source 
distribution.
3-As I mentioned before the OpenCypher is based on Apache License and it is 
included.
4-Regarding the DISCLAIMER-WIP:
We do not have any tasks to do or tasks pending and not sure if we have to go 
by DISCLAIMER-WIP. What is your advice?

All the licenses are there and I do not have anything for pending tasks so I am 
not sure if we should use Standard or Work in Progress disclaimer. Please 
advise.

We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE.

Best regards,

On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung  wrote:
> Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content.
>
>
> 
> From: Eya Badal 
> Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM
> To: dev@age.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE
>
> Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback.
> >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list and 
> >ask everyone to vote?
>
>
> On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung  wrote:
> > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be 
> > just the mentor.
> >
> > A good vote thread might be like:
> > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html
> >
> > 1. md5 - should not include
> >I will remove this file.
> >
> > 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a 
> > apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip
> >  and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/
> > This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file.
> >
> >I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make sure it 
> >is consistent.
> >
> > 3.
> > I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP
> > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers
> >Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer?
> >
> > 4.
> > openCypher/openCypher9.pdf
> > maybe don't include this in the source? where is the file from? is there a 
> > possible licensing issue?
> >
> >It won't be any licensing issue since OpenCypher is based on Apache License 
> >as well which is included in the licensing file.
> > 5,
> > KEYS.txt
> > don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be in git 
> > repo
> > I will remove this as well.
> >
> >Thank you again and please advise if you have any other suggestions or 
> >thoughts.
> > 
> >
> > From: Eya Badal 
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE
> >
> > Dear Mentors,
> >
> > We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the 
> > following link:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/
> >
> > Could you please review and approve.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Eya
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.3.0 (RC1)

[Felix Cheung]

+1

Notes from checks:
incubating in name
the file should probably be called
  apache-age-0.3.0.rc0-incubating.tar.gz
  instead of incubator-age-0.3.0.rc0-incubating.tar.gz
- signature and hash fine
- DISCLAIMER is fine
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have ASF headers



From: Eya Badal 
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 3:11:10 PM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.3.0 (RC1)

Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version 0.3.0

The vote is open now and until February 5th at 3:11 PM PST and passes if a 
majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.3.0
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...


To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/

Please note that this is the first Apache release for Apache AGE.


The tag to be voted on is v0.3.0.rc0-incubating (commit 
549ac9ff63337f64a9c19d8b9950b89ae412edee):
https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/tree/v0.3.0.rc0-incubating

The release files, including signatures, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/

Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS

The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
FD8B 268F 784A CE10 F201  E63B C063 8775 6375 38D2

The notes corresponding to this release can be found at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.3.0.rc0-incubating


Thank you very much,
Eya Badal

Re: [DISCUSS] AGE Container Support

[Felix Cheung]

I’d like to point out the while it is convenient, as per policy, an Apache 
project should not have “official” or dev binaries that created nightly or 
similarly that is not an approved, voted release.

In other words, dev tag on development branch should be clearly marked as not 
an official release

https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#host-rc



From: Nicholas Sorrell 
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 6:07:32 AM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AGE Container Support

Because Docker builds can support multiple tags, I would propose that the 
default `latest` tag point to the latest stable release and that version 
tagging becomes explicit (i.e., 0.3.0) in the future AGE Docker images. I would 
also propose a `dev` tag that points to the head of the chosen development 
branch.

Regarding if the containers should include Postgres, I would say yes. I think 
the main goal of the containers is to make it easy to use/try/contribute-to 
AGE, and as long as the Docker Hub images are automated, the Dockerfile will be 
viewable by users who want to learn how they can include the extension into 
their own custom build of PG (such as TimeScale). For example, anyone looking 
for dependencies and build steps could look at 
https://hub.docker.com/r/sorrell/agensgraph-extension/dockerfile.

When it comes to virtualization, I think including PG is good. As AGE matures, 
the team should look to support binary releases and utilize package management 
(apt/debs, yum/rpms) so that it's easier to install AGE without compiling.

--
Nick Sorrell



From: Eya Badal 
Sent: Monday, March 8, 2021 2:27 PM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AGE Container Support



On 2021/02/18 22:24:04, Josh Innis  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The AGE community is asking us to support more containers than just Docker,
> see https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/issues/24. Additionally, upon
> review of our Docker images they are in need of being updated.
>
> The Docker images still refer to AgensGraph-Extension. This is due to these
> images being set up before our official acceptance to the Apache incubator
> and the official name change to Apache AGE (A Graph Extension).
> Furthermore, these images refer to the master branch of AGE, so these are
> pointing to development work instead of any official release. Personally, I
> believe that should be altered, but please let us know what you think.
>
> Moving on to the github issue: Some of our community is unable to use
> Docker and is requesting us to support LXC/Snap and/or Kata. For a brief
> summary of all these technologies, please refer to the links below.
>
> LXC:
> https://linuxcontainers.org/lxc/introduction/
>
> Snap:
> https://snapcraft.io/about
>
> A forum discussing Snap:
> https://askubuntu.com/questions/808524/whats-the-main-difference-between-docker-and-snap
>
> Kata Official Site:
> https://katacontainers.io/
>
> A Good Discussion on Kata:
> https://platform9.com/blog/kata-containers-docker-and-kubernetes-how-they-all-fit-together/
>
> Personally, some of the questions I have on the subject before going
> forward on providing support for this is: AGE is an extension of Postgres,
> so should our containers include Postgres in them to avoid dependencies.
> Furthermore, would that affect users' ability to use other extensions, such
> as TimeScaleDB, in these environments?
>
> Thanks.
>
>We requested to have a space on Apache docker hub. Once we have a space on 
>that docker hub we can have official Apache AGE images over there.

Thank you!!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.4.0

[Felix Cheung]

+1

drivers/nodejs/src/index.ts - is there a reason this file does not have Apache 
License header?

- incubating in name
- signature and hash fine
- DISCLAIMER is fine
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- source files have ASF headers - see note at the top




From: Eya Badal 
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 12:05:07 PM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.4.0

Dear Apache Community,

Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version 0.4.0

The vote is open now and until April 16th at 12:05 PM PST and passes if a 
majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.4.0
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...


To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/

*
The git tag to be discussed and voted upon:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/0.4.0

The git commit hash:
commit e9add439468ccff3780a392f9cead627fcaecf1e

The release files for 0.4.0, can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.4.0.rc0/

The signatures, files, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/

Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS

The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
FD8B 268F 784A CE10 F201  E63B C063 8775 6375 38D2

For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/0.4.0

Thank you for your time in advance.

Best regards,
Eya Badal

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache AGE Sub Project - Visualization Tool

[Felix Cheung]

Sounds great. Is this already built? If it is, it is a software donation
(software grant process)


On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 2:11 PM Eya Badal  wrote:

> Dear Everyone,
> @All Mentors
>
> I hope you are doing great.
>
> We would like to discuss the possibility of having a sub-project for
> Apache AGE. This sub-project is a visualization tool that enables Apache
> AGE users to visualize their data.
>
> This tool is a web-based graph visualization tool that allows you to
> visualize a graph. It connects to a Postgres server running the AGE graph
> database extension. AGViewer has a query editor where you can submit SQL
> and Cypher (or Hybrid) queries, allowing you to build, modify and query
> graphs in AGE. The visualization supports many layout formats such as
> COSE-Bilkent, Dagre, and Euler. In addition, there is a table output for
> displaying non-graph results.
>
>
> Please advise and give us your feedback.
>
> Thank you very much,
> Eya Badal
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.5.0

[Felix Cheung]

+1

Though it will be great to fix soon:


  *incubating in name

- signature and hash fine
- DISCLAIMER is fine
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files

- Check: All source files have ASF headers
about 20 source files for tests do not have the Apache header.
/drivers/jdbc/lib/src/test/java/org/apache/age/jdbc/

what is the source of this jar?
/drivers/jdbc/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar


From: Dehowe Feng 
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 10:41:28 AM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.5.0

Hey Eya,

I can vouch for what you wrote to be true, and am looking forward to the 
release.

+1

On 2021/07/10 14:32:05, Eya Badal  wrote:
> Dear Apache Community,
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version 0.5.0
>
> The vote is open now and until July 13th at 7:32 AM PST and passes if a 
> majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.5.0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
>
> To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
>
> *
> The git tag to be discussed and voted upon:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.5.0
>
> The git commit hash:
> commit e36e6d79c2a65259f4b46cd9a3623d69518605a4
>
> The release files for 0.5.0, can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.5.0.rc0%20/
>
> The signatures, files, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/
>
> Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS
>
> The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> FD8B 268F 784A CE10 F201  E63B C063 8775 6375 38D2
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.5.0
>
> Thank you for your time in advance.
>
> Best regards,
> Eya Badal
>
>

Download pages and links to podling releases

[Felix Cheung]

Hello,

Could we look into the download page please?


-- Forwarded message -
From: Justin Mclean 
Date: Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 6:18 PM
Subject: [MENTORS] Download pages and links to podling releases
To: 


Hi,

Can mentors please make themselves familiar with the requirements for
download pages and links [1] as we seem to have a number of projects that
are not providing downloads in the required manner.

In general:
- Please use https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua <
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua> for releases
- Please use https://downloads.apache.org/  for hashes and signatures


Form a quick check these project don’t seem to have an obvious download
page:
Age
Annotator
BlueMarlin
Liminal
Linkis
Marvin
SDAP
Sedona
Wayang

Now in some cases these are newish projects and they haven’t made a
release, however others on that list have made releases and really should
have a download page. If they do have a download page please provide the
URL.

These projects look to have issue with the download links themselves:
BRPC - https://brpc.apache.org/download/ 
Crail - http://crail.apache.org/download/ 
DataLab - http://datalab.apache.org/#download <
http://datalab.apache.org/#download>
Doris - http://doris.apache.org/master/en/downloads/downloads.html <
http://doris.apache.org/master/en/downloads/downloads.html>
Heron - https://heron.apache.org/download 
Hivemall - https://hivemall.apache.org/download.html <
https://hivemall.apache.org/download.html>
Kyuubi - https://kyuubi.apache.org/releases.html <
https://kyuubi.apache.org/releases.html>
Livy - https://livy.apache.org/download/ 
Milagro - https://milagro.apache.org/docs/downloads/ <
https://milagro.apache.org/docs/downloads/>
Nemo - https://nemo.apache.org/pages/downloads/ <
https://nemo.apache.org/pages/downloads/>
NLPCraft - https://nlpcraft.apache.org/download.html <
https://nlpcraft.apache.org/download.html>
NuttX - https://nuttx.apache.org/download/ <
https://nuttx.apache.org/download/>
PageSpeed - https://pagespeed.apache.org/doc/download <
https://pagespeed.apache.org/doc/download>
PonyMail - https://ponymail.apache.org/downloads.html <
https://ponymail.apache.org/downloads.html>
Spot - https://spot.apache.org/download/ 
Teaclave - https://teaclave.apache.org/download/ <
https://teaclave.apache.org/download/>
Training - https://training.apache.org/downloads.html <
https://training.apache.org/downloads.html>

This list was autogenerated by a script and may have got some things wrong.
If you need details on a particular project and it’s links please check
here. [1]

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://gist.github.com/justinmclean/60a824a2f3fe97e519ed25d7c39a47ed


1. https://infra.apache.org/release-distribution.html#download-links

Incubator disclaimer missing from podling websites

[Felix Cheung]

Hello,

Please look into the website


-- Forwarded message -
From: sebb 
Date: Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 5:35 AM
Subject: Incubator disclaimer missing from several podling websites
To: general 


As the subject says: the disclaimer is missing from the following websites:

Age
BlueMarlin (no website at all)
Doris - does not work at all without JavaScript
Inlong - does not work without Javascript
Kyuubi
Liminal
Linkis - no website yet
Nemo

Yunikorn has some incorrect text: ", sponsored by the name of Apache
TLP sponsor."

Milagro looks OK in a browser, but uses a redirect that does not work
for automated checkers.
Given that the redirect is unconditional, this would be better done by
the server, e.g. through .htaccess.

It should be present on all pages.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

RE: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

[Felix Cheung]

Checking this release, not a blocker but a question:


- incubating in name

- signature and hash fine

KEYS file - you should try to sign files with @apache.org issuer email

- DISCLAIMER is fine

- LICENSE and NOTICE

The PostgreSQL license - is it because of code file taken from the project
(and then is there license header for these files?)

If it is not coming from code file, then is it because of a binary
dependency? If so, it should be in a separate LICENSE-binary file like
https://github.com/apache/iotdb/blob/master/LICENSE-binary

And potentially the license should be separately stored like
https://github.com/apache/iotdb/tree/master/licenses

more info:
https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#bundled-vs-non-bundled

- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have ASF headers



On 2021/09/24 11:34:24 Kevin Ratnasekera wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked the following.
>
> - Incubating in name.
>
> - PGP Signatures.
>
> - SHA512 Checksums.
>
> - DISCLAIMER exists.
>
> - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine.
>
> - ASF headers on source files.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Kevin
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:52 PM Eya Badal  wrote:
>
> > +1, I checked the follwoing:
> >
> >
> > x] Download links are valid.
> > [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> > [x] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files are correct.
> > [x] All files have license headers if necessary.
> >
> > Best,
> > Eya Badal Abdisho
> >
> > On 2021/09/15 16:11:47, Josh Innis  wrote:
> > > Dear Apache Community,
> > >
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version
> > 0.6.0
> > >
> > >
> > > The vote is open now and until September 18th at 10:30 AM PST and
passes
> > if
> > > a majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.6.0
> > >
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > >
> > >
> > > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
> > >
> > >
> > > *Functionalities included and addressed in this release:*
> > >
> > > - Add VLE SRF (Set Returning Function).
> > >
> > > - Fix Vertex, Edge, and Path serialization bug (AGE2-307)
> > >
> > > - Fix CREATE passback bug (AGE2-337).
> > >
> > > - Fix CREATE transaction block bug (AGE2-345).
> > >
> > > - Fix parallel build errors.
> > >
> > > - Fix Travis CI compiler warnings.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *The git tag to be discussed and voted upon:*
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.6.0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *The git commit hash:*
> > >
> > > commit 3681c90da68353507001db89eb429755d34857f7
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *The release files for 0.6.0, can be found at:*
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.6.0.rc0/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *The signatures, files, etc. can be found at:*
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file:*
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:*
> > >
> > > 2245 1CFA 0521 1612 A4EA 9F05 6EF7 BD28 B870 8B05
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *For information about the contents of this release, see:*
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.6.0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you for your time.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Josh Innis
> > > We create value for our clients by connecting the world's data.
> > > Josh Innis Software Engineer
> > > Core R&D Team
> > > *P*: (831)278-0327
> > > 3945 Freedom Circle #260, Santa Clara, CA 95054
> > > <
> >
https://www.google.com/maps/place/3945+Freedom+Cir+%23260,+Santa+Clara,+CA+95054/
> > >
> > > bitnine.net
> > >
> >
>

RE: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

[Felix Cheung]

There bundle also applies to the source release. However, if you are
certain none of the source code file or snippet is from the Postgres code
base, then, correct, you don’t need to include Postgres license info.

You might want to amend the license and notice, and re-sign with a key with
@apache.org address from my comments earlier.

I’m not sure if it will be flagged at IPMC, but it is best since you have
changed the disclaimer in this release.


On 2021/10/05 16:54:29 Josh Innis wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> We do not have any binary code from Postgres. The key phrase I saw was "
> LICENSE and NOTICE need only be modified to accommodate them *only if
their
> bits are bundled*." The Apache AGE repository does not have any binary
> source files in it. After reading the links you sent, it appears we do not
> have to keep the Postgres license info in NOTICE and LICENSE.
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 12:11 PM Felix Cheung  wrote:
>
> > Checking this release, not a blocker but a question:
> >
> >
> > - incubating in name
> >
> > - signature and hash fine
> >
> > KEYS file - you should try to sign files with @apache.org issuer email
> >
> > - DISCLAIMER is fine
> >
> > - LICENSE and NOTICE
> >
> > The PostgreSQL license - is it because of code file taken from the
project
> > (and then is there license header for these files?)
> >
> > If it is not coming from code file, then is it because of a binary
> > dependency? If so, it should be in a separate LICENSE-binary file like
> > https://github.com/apache/iotdb/blob/master/LICENSE-binary
> >
> > And potentially the license should be separately stored like
> > https://github.com/apache/iotdb/tree/master/licenses
> >
> > more info:
> > https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#bundled-vs-non-bundled
> >
> > - No unexpected binary files
> > - All source files have ASF headers
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2021/09/24 11:34:24 Kevin Ratnasekera wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I checked the following.
> > >
> > > - Incubating in name.
> > >
> > > - PGP Signatures.
> > >
> > > - SHA512 Checksums.
> > >
> > > - DISCLAIMER exists.
> > >
> > > - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine.
> > >
> > > - ASF headers on source files.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:52 PM Eya Badal  wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1, I checked the follwoing:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > x] Download links are valid.
> > > > [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> > > > [x] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files are correct.
> > > > [x] All files have license headers if necessary.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Eya Badal Abdisho
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/09/15 16:11:47, Josh Innis  wrote:
> > > > > Dear Apache Community,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE
> > version
> > > > 0.6.0
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote is open now and until September 18th at 10:30 AM PST and
> > passes
> > > > if
> > > > > a majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.6.0
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > *Functionalities included and addressed in this release:*
> > > > >
> > > > > - Add VLE SRF (Set Returning Function).
> > > > >
> > > > > - Fix Vertex, Edge, and Path serialization bug (AGE2-307)
> > > > >
> > > > > - Fix CREATE passback bug (AGE2-337).
> > > > >
> > > > > - Fix CREATE transaction block bug (AGE2-345).
> > > > >
> > > > > - Fix parallel build errors.
> > > > >
> > > > > - Fix Travis CI compiler warnings.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > *

RE: Re: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.6.0

[Felix Cheung]

In such case, the inclusion of the license is required.

Also, ideally, the 3rd party source code should be retained as separate
source files so we could keep the license header on each file. If they are
code snippet, then it is a bit of a grey area and we should attribute the
source in license (a practice I've seen in other projects)

See
https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
"
4. Minor modifications/additions to third-party source files should
typically be licensed under the same terms as the rest of the third-party
source for convenience.

5. The project's PMC should deal with major modifications/additions to
third-party source files on a case-by-case basis."




On 2021/10/13 20:44:15 Josh Innis wrote:
> We resigned the files using an @apache.org account. There is source code
> from Postgres in AGE. There are no files but there are some snippets.
> We create value for our clients by connecting the world's data.
> Josh Innis Software Engineer
> Core R&D Team
> *P*: (831)278-0327
> 3945 Freedom Circle #260, Santa Clara, CA 95054
> <
https://www.google.com/maps/place/3945+Freedom+Cir+%23260,+Santa+Clara,+CA+95054/
>
> bitnine.net
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 5:28 PM Felix Cheung  wrote:
>
> > There bundle also applies to the source release. However, if you are
> > certain none of the source code file or snippet is from the Postgres
code
> > base, then, correct, you don’t need to include Postgres license info.
> >
> > You might want to amend the license and notice, and re-sign with a key
with
> > @apache.org address from my comments earlier.
> >
> > I’m not sure if it will be flagged at IPMC, but it is best since you
have
> > changed the disclaimer in this release.
> >
> >
> > On 2021/10/05 16:54:29 Josh Innis wrote:
> > > Hi Felix,
> > >
> > > We do not have any binary code from Postgres. The key phrase I saw
was "
> > > LICENSE and NOTICE need only be modified to accommodate them *only if
> > their
> > > bits are bundled*." The Apache AGE repository does not have any binary
> > > source files in it. After reading the links you sent, it appears we do
> > not
> > > have to keep the Postgres license info in NOTICE and LICENSE.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 12:11 PM Felix Cheung  wrote:
> > >
> > > > Checking this release, not a blocker but a question:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - incubating in name
> > > >
> > > > - signature and hash fine
> > > >
> > > > KEYS file - you should try to sign files with @apache.org issuer
email
> > > >
> > > > - DISCLAIMER is fine
> > > >
> > > > - LICENSE and NOTICE
> > > >
> > > > The PostgreSQL license - is it because of code file taken from the
> > project
> > > > (and then is there license header for these files?)
> > > >
> > > > If it is not coming from code file, then is it because of a binary
> > > > dependency? If so, it should be in a separate LICENSE-binary file
like
> > > > https://github.com/apache/iotdb/blob/master/LICENSE-binary
> > > >
> > > > And potentially the license should be separately stored like
> > > > https://github.com/apache/iotdb/tree/master/licenses
> > > >
> > > > more info:
> > > > https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#bundled-vs-non-bundled
> > > >
> > > > - No unexpected binary files
> > > > - All source files have ASF headers
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2021/09/24 11:34:24 Kevin Ratnasekera wrote:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > I checked the following.
> > > > >
> > > > > - Incubating in name.
> > > > >
> > > > > - PGP Signatures.
> > > > >
> > > > > - SHA512 Checksums.
> > > > >
> > > > > - DISCLAIMER exists.
> > > > >
> > > > > - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > - ASF headers on source files.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Kevin
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:52 PM Eya Badal 
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1, I checked the follwoing:
>

RE: Re: Apache AGE (Incubating) - Community Graduation Vote

[Felix Cheung]

Great to hear.

I reviewed the maturity model.

1) do you have the breakdown on the PPMC membership on affiliation
(companies)? And PPMC growth?

2) Is there a list of community members (committer and PPMC? It was
mentioned in the maturity model item CS10 but not sure I see it on the
age.Apache.org site.

3) How is
https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer released?

4) the current documentation link is broken on
incubator.apache.org/projects/age.html

5) have the project completed name search and approval? Is the PPMC
checking and defending Apache AGE brand use?

6) Lastly, let’s get 0.6.0 released with licensing resolved.



On 2021/11/14 03:39:21 Andrew Ko wrote:
> Agreeing with the comments made by Juan,
> I think it is imperative for the AGE community and mentors to come to a
> term that the license issue raised before (related to PostgreSQL and ASF)
> is resolved in the new 0.6.0 release.
>
>
> 2021년 11월 13일 (토) 오후 8:46, Juan Pan 님이 작성:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > 19 months is not a short phase. I am inclined to this graduation
proposal
> > and still well suggest firstly finishing the 0.6 release. The reason is
> > that there are only 3 Apache releases during the incubator, and some
issues
> > are suspending. 0.6 release will be a positive sign that this community
is
> > able to run independently.
> >
> >
> > Best
> > Trista
> >
> >
> >
> >
--
> > Juan Pan(Trista) Twitter: @tristaZero
> >
> >
> > On 11/9/2021 12:31，Eya Badal wrote：
> > Hi AGE community and Mentors,
> >
> > Since entering incubation 18 months ago in April 2020 and with five
> > versions of AGE released, and 0.6.0 imminent, it's fair to say the AGE
> > community has demonstrated its ability to build software releases the
> > Apache Way.
> >
> > We have prepared an assessment of the Apache AGE podling’s maturity,
meant
> > to help inform the decision (of the mentors, community, Incubator PMC,
and
> > ASF Board of Directors) to graduate it as a top-level Apache project. We
> > used the ASF project maturity model
> > <
> >
https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html
> > >
> > to evaluate the Apache AGE project and assess itself as having no major
> > areas for concern. The assessment can be found at the Apache AGE website
> >  under the COMMUNITY menu.
> >
> > In addition to building and releasing software, the community has grown
the
> > Apache AGE project in other areas.
> >
> >
> > -
> >
> > There have been 64 unique contributors across the AGE and the subproject
> > AGE Viewer. These Contributors have raised >170 issues or pull requests.
> > -
> >
> > We have been addressing Github issues since the start but timeliness was
> > an issue. In April we created our internal SLA to categorise (label),
> > assign, and respond to issue and pull requests. Since April, 95% are
> > responded within 72 hours (80% of issues are responded to within 24
hrs).
> > -
> >
> > Contributions span more than 20 countries across the globe - Belarus,
> > Belgium, China, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg,
> > Netherlands, Russia, South Korea, Thailand, UK, Ukraine, USA, and
Vietnam.
> > -
> >
> > We have amassed positive comments throughout and gathered >470 stars.
> > -
> >
> > We have committers from 4 different companies.
> >
> >
> > AGE mentors, what is your opinion on this?
> >
> > Do you agree that we are ready to graduate?
> >
> > Are there any remaining issues that we can improve on?
> >
> > If we can capture your issues of concern we can then work those issues
to
> > resolution.
> >
> > Your feedback would be very much appreciated!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Eya
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE (incubating) Release v0.6.0

[Felix Cheung]

As a reminder, when a vote is reset, it should have a new git tag and a new 
release share. git tag should increment from rc0, rc1, rc2 etc - optionally, 
this gives reviewers a way to see the changes/diffs and will help move the 
voting process along better.

ie.

https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.6.0-rc1
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.6.0-rc1/

- incubating in name
- signature and hash fine
- DISCLAIMER is fine
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- No unexpected binary files
- All source files have ASF headers (except those from PostgreSQL project)


From: John Gemignani 
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 5:40:08 PM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE (incubating) Release v0.6.0

+1,

   - Signature and hash - check.
   - DISCLAIMER - check.
   - LICENSE and NOTICE - check.
   - No unexpected binary files - check.
   - incubating in name - check.

John

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:51 AM Muhammad Shoaib  wrote:

> +1,
>
>
> I confirm that I have checked the following and they look good to the best
> of my knowledge
>
>
>
>- Signature and hash fine
>- DISCLAIMER is fine
>- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine there is no WIP information there now.
>- No unexpected binary files
>- incubating in name
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 10:33 PM Josh Innis  wrote:
>
> > Dear Apache Community,
> >
> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version
> > 0.6.0.
> >
> > This release includes the updates to the NOTICE, removing the WIP
> > disclaimer
> > and adding the standard disclaimer, and changing the copyright header in
> > files
> > that are predominately Postgres source code.
> >
> > The vote is open now and until November 24th at 2:30 PM PST and passes if
> > a majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.6.0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
> >
> > *Functionalities included and addressed in this release:*
> > - Add VLE SRF (Set Returning Function).
> > - Fix Vertex, Edge, and Path serialization bug (AGE2-307)
> > - Fix CREATE passback bug (AGE2-337).
> > - Fix CREATE transaction block bug (AGE2-345).
> > - Fix parallel build errors.
> > - Fix Travis CI compiler warnings.
> >
> > *
> > *The git tag to be discussed and voted upon:*
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.6.0
> >
> > *The git commit hash:*
> > commit 9786fc32d52c577cf67e9e89409246b9e7a3a063
> >
> > *The release files for 0.6.0, can be found at:*
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.6.0.rc0/
> >
> > *The signatures, files, etc. can be found at:*
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/
> >
> > *Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file:*
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS
> >
> > *The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:*
> > 4D57 8595 934A 64F4 8DD9  B39C 7FAD 0CDD C278 09E8
> >
> > *For information about the contents of this release, see:*
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.6.0
> >
> > Thank you for your time.
> > Josh Innis
> >
>
>
> --
>
> * Muhammad Shoaib, PhD*
>
> * Senior Research Engineer *
>
> *P* : +82-70-4800-3517   *F* : +82-70-8677-2552
> 401 Yangcheon-ro A/1201, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, 07528, Korea
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE (incubating) Release v0.6.0

[Felix Cheung]

+1

From: John Gemignani 
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 5:40:08 PM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache AGE (incubating) Release v0.6.0

+1,

   - Signature and hash - check.
   - DISCLAIMER - check.
   - LICENSE and NOTICE - check.
   - No unexpected binary files - check.
   - incubating in name - check.

John

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:51 AM Muhammad Shoaib  wrote:

> +1,
>
>
> I confirm that I have checked the following and they look good to the best
> of my knowledge
>
>
>
>- Signature and hash fine
>- DISCLAIMER is fine
>- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine there is no WIP information there now.
>- No unexpected binary files
>- incubating in name
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 10:33 PM Josh Innis  wrote:
>
> > Dear Apache Community,
> >
> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache AGE version
> > 0.6.0.
> >
> > This release includes the updates to the NOTICE, removing the WIP
> > disclaimer
> > and adding the standard disclaimer, and changing the copyright header in
> > files
> > that are predominately Postgres source code.
> >
> > The vote is open now and until November 24th at 2:30 PM PST and passes if
> > a majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.6.0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
> >
> > *Functionalities included and addressed in this release:*
> > - Add VLE SRF (Set Returning Function).
> > - Fix Vertex, Edge, and Path serialization bug (AGE2-307)
> > - Fix CREATE passback bug (AGE2-337).
> > - Fix CREATE transaction block bug (AGE2-345).
> > - Fix parallel build errors.
> > - Fix Travis CI compiler warnings.
> >
> > *
> > *The git tag to be discussed and voted upon:*
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.6.0
> >
> > *The git commit hash:*
> > commit 9786fc32d52c577cf67e9e89409246b9e7a3a063
> >
> > *The release files for 0.6.0, can be found at:*
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/0.6.0.rc0/
> >
> > *The signatures, files, etc. can be found at:*
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/
> >
> > *Signatures used for AGE RCs can be found in this file:*
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/KEYS
> >
> > *The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:*
> > 4D57 8595 934A 64F4 8DD9  B39C 7FAD 0CDD C278 09E8
> >
> > *For information about the contents of this release, see:*
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/releases/tag/v0.6.0
> >
> > Thank you for your time.
> > Josh Innis
> >
>
>
> --
>
> * Muhammad Shoaib, PhD*
>
> * Senior Research Engineer *
>
> *P* : +82-70-4800-3517   *F* : +82-70-8677-2552
> 401 Yangcheon-ro A/1201, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, 07528, Korea
>

Re: Apache AGE (Incubating) - Community Graduation Vote

[Felix Cheung]

That looks good to me. +1

To note, 0.6 is not on “Download” on 
https://age.apache.org/


From: John Gemignani 
Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 5:55:40 PM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Apache AGE (Incubating) - Community Graduation Vote

I completely agree with all of Eya and Josh's points.

Especially, now that we have v0.6.0 out (which took a lot of extra attention 
and cleaned up a lot of pending issues) and with the upcoming release of 
v0.7.0. The latter release will add a significant amount of new functionality. 
This makes me confident that the project will be able to move forward a lot 
more smoothly.

+1

John

On 2021/12/02 01:39:41 Josh Innis wrote:
> This project has seen incredible growth from when it was originally donated 
> to Apache. The community continues to grow as more people see the 
> opportunities in what the project could be. Now that we are nearly done with 
> our original goal of implementing the openCypher specification in Postgres as 
> an extension, we can now begin to pursue some of these powerful features that 
> the community is requesting in the Github repository. The team is continuing 
> to grow at an accelerated pace, with most of the new committers being 
> accepted in the last six months. I personally think the future of AGE is 
> bright, especially with all the new features that will be coming out in 
> v0.7.0.
>
> On 2021/12/01 02:42:22 Eya Badal wrote:
> > Thank you mentors for your valuable feedback. The feedback is addressed 
> > below.
> >
> > Regarding GitHub issues and pull requests:
> >   It is true that in the earlier months we were sluggish in responding to 
> > and closing out issues. In
> >   April we created SLA to categorise (label), assign, and respond to 
> > issues. Since April, 95% are
> >   responded within 72 hours (80% of issues are responded to within 24 hrs). 
> > In the last month we
> >   have closed 8 issues across the project. Regarding pull requests we are 
> > behind our internal
> >   SLA but have addressed that in the last 48 hrs.
> >
> > Regarding committer and contributor diversity:
> >   The committers and contributors act on their own initiative without 
> > representing a corporation
> >   or organization. Core contributors are indeed employees of a single 
> > company (Bitnine Global,
> >   the project donator) who has interest in the success of AGE but there are 
> > many entirely
> >   independent contributors and committers. Contributions span more than 20 
> > countries across
> >   the globe including Australia, Belarus, Belgium, China, France, Germany, 
> > Ireland, Israel, Italy,
> >   Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Nigeria, The Philippines, Russia, South 
> > Korea, Thailand, UK,
> >   Ukraine, USA and Vietnam.
> >
> > Regarding the breakdown of the PPMC membership on affiliation (companies) 
> > and PPMC growth:
> >
> >  The PPMC representation, excluding mentors is as follows:
> >
> >   Bitnine Global: Eya Badal, Josh Innis, John Gemignani, Dehowe Feng(in 
> > voting process).
> >   Liberation Data: Jasper Blues
> >   Immuta: Mason Sharp
> >
> >  The project has added five new committers taking the total to 10 
> > (excluding mentors).
> >
> >   Bitnine Global: Dehowe Feng
> >   Kroger: Nick Sorrell
> >   Ghent University: Pieterjan De Potter
> >   Agedb: Andrew Ko, Alex Kwak
> >
> > RE CS10 “The project maintains a public list of its contributors who have 
> > decision power”:
> > We now have the list of community members (committer and PPMC) at 
> > age.apache.org
> >
> > Regarding how incubator-age-viewer is released:
> >   Age-viewer has been released 8 times. The age-viewer developers are 
> > looking to release in the
> >   Apache way soon. The age team is coaching the age-viewer developers to 
> > encourage future
> >   releases to comply with Apache guiding principles.
> >
> > The documentation link at incubator.apache.org/projects/age.html is 
> > corrected.
> >
> > Regarding project name search and approval:
> >   We have completed name search and approval. PPMC is actively checking 
> > Apache AGE brand
> >   use.
> >
> > The licensing issue regarding 0.6.0 has been resolved. We’re happy to 
> > announce Apache AGE 0.6.0 is officially out today.
> >
> > Thank you for your feedback and recognition that after 6 releases including 
> > 4 Apache releases, we have demonstrated that this community is able to run 
> > independently outside incubation.
> >
> > We look forward to a positive vote on graduation to a Top Level Project.
> >
> > Thank you
> > Eya
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2021/11/09 04:31:33 Eya Badal wrote:
> > > Hi AGE community and Mentors,
> > >
> > > Since entering incubation 18 months ago in April 2020 and with five
> > > versions of AGE released, and 0.6.0 imminent, it's fair to say the AGE
> > > community has demonstrated its ability to build software releases the
> > > 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE Viewer (incubating) 1.0.0-rc0

[Felix Cheung]

lots of dependencies - are these licenses reviewed and handled in the LICENSE 
file?
https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/blob/main/backend/package.json
https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/blob/main/frontend/package.jso\

this requires a component - again could be a LICENSE check, if it is required 
for execution (at runtime) we should check license of that too. Also what is 
the trademark on the “AgensGraph” name?
https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/blob/main/backend/src/models/agensgraph/agensGraphRepository.js
'@bitnine-oss/ag-driver');

The
https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/blob/main/README.md
references  to bitnine/agviewer

From: Eya Badal 
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 6:44:11 AM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE Viewer (incubating) 1.0.0-rc0

Looks good to me
+1

I checked the following:

- Signature and hash - check.
- DISCLAIMER - check.
- LICENSE and NOTICE - check.
- No unexpected binary files - check.
- incubating in name - check.

Best,
Eya

On 2021/12/23 00:58:26 Alex Kwak wrote:
> Dear Apache AGE Community,
>
> This is an official vote for the Apache AGE Viewer release v1.0.0-rc0 that we 
> have been working toward it.
>
> To learn more about Apache AGE, please see http://age.apache.org/
>
> Functionalities included and addressed in this release:
> - Graph visualization for AGE.
> - Extends edge and vertex point by point.
>
>
> The vote is open now and until December 25th at 5:00 PM PST and passes if a 
> majority +1 votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache AGE 0.6.0
> [ ] 0 I won't get in the way
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
>
> The git tag to be discussed and voted upon
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/releases/tag/v1.0.0
>
> The git commit hash:
> commit 2c55b2302875449565674aa039517734cf338031
>
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/viewer/apache-age-viewer-1.0.0-incubating-rc0/
>
> The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is:
> 8fa45254bba973678243a78321869aaf88c746b55168d4401931c5d6e87192c80d581d97e927c8b87098aaacba8d6f77bf1ca225e864c49117f5cb1887c699d0
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/age/KEYS
>
> The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> 0E7F 408D 8C6A 1952 329C B379 D471 FDCE 5F5C 5B82
>
> For more information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/releases/tag/v1.0.0
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Alex Kwak
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Official Docker Image for Apache AGE

[Felix Cheung]

Pls see

https://infra.apache.org/release-distribution.html#dockerhub

Example https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-12781

From: Eya Badal 
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:58:13 PM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Official Docker Image for Apache AGE

Mentors, could you please evaluate and approve the Docker distribution method 
currently available at this address 
https://hub.docker.com/r/joefagan/incubator-age so that Apache Infra can create 
a dockerhub account under Apache dockerhub for AGE so we can push the AGE image 
there?

Best regards,
Eya

On 2021/09/13 16:23:37 Joe Fagan wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> @Mentors please advise on how to make this AGE docker image official and
> hosted on the Apache Docker Hub.
> https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/joefagan/incubator-age
> Thanks
> Joe
>

Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

[Felix Cheung]

Shouldn’t this be a vote?

Please see 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-22356

From: Joe Fagan 
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 7:34:36 AM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

Dear mentors,

We would like to have an image for Incubator AGE Viewer at hub.docker.com.
Is it possible to approve the creation of
https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/age-viewer


We will not require push access to this and can instead use automated build
based on tags in the https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer
repository.

Once we have your approval we will raise a ticket on JIRA to the Infra Team
with the relevant details.

Thank you
Joe

Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

[Felix Cheung]

I guess I’m linking to myself. I see infra asks for mentor, but as a community 
you should just have a vote. You can explicitly ask a mentor to vote too

https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxzo04gxxkqvmtw7rmzkw8t2d8cf3nwo

From: Felix Cheung 
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 9:51:05 PM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

Shouldn’t this be a vote?

Please see 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-22356

From: Joe Fagan 
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 7:34:36 AM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

Dear mentors,

We would like to have an image for Incubator AGE Viewer at hub.docker.com.
Is it possible to approve the creation of
https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/age-viewer
<https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/ageviewer>

We will not require push access to this and can instead use automated build
based on tags in the https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer
repository.

Once we have your approval we will raise a ticket on JIRA to the Infra Team
with the relevant details.

Thank you
Joe

Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

[Felix Cheung]

I’d suggest the community to have a discussion of the need. What support model 
that will be etc.

Mentor “vote” is more a proxy of having a clear understanding in the community.



From: Joe Fagan 
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 10:14:42 PM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

Hi all, please vote to utilise dockerhub as a distribution method for
Viewer as it is for AGE

@Felix

The direction from Infra team on the incubator AGE dockerhub request was...
"Neither of these threads expressly confirm the project's desire to adopt
DockerHub distribution, they are just discussions about issues related to
it. Please have your project mentors evaluate and approve the requested
distribution method."

Can I ask you to either vote, or evaluate and approve the
dockerhub distribution method for Viewer too, whichever is most
appropriate, or give further specific advice.

Thanks
Joe

On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 05:59, Felix Cheung 
wrote:

> I guess I’m linking to myself. I see infra asks for mentor, but as a
> community you should just have a vote. You can explicitly ask a mentor to
> vote too
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxzo04gxxkqvmtw7rmzkw8t2d8cf3nwo
> ____
> From: Felix Cheung 
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 9:51:05 PM
> To: dev@age.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
>
> Shouldn’t this be a vote?
>
> Please see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-22356
> 
> From: Joe Fagan 
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 7:34:36 AM
> To: dev@age.apache.org 
> Subject: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> We would like to have an image for Incubator AGE Viewer at hub.docker.com.
> Is it possible to approve the creation of
> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/age-viewer
> <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/ageviewer>
>
> We will not require push access to this and can instead use automated build
> based on tags in the https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer
> repository.
>
> Once we have your approval we will raise a ticket on JIRA to the Infra Team
> with the relevant details.
>
> Thank you
> Joe
>

Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

[Felix Cheung]

On "support"- Think you said it -

In reference to the links: Docker is not a replacement for Apache releases,
and should not be considered as such.

Should be clear nightly builds should not be on DockerHub, etc


From: Josh Innis 
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 8:08:30 AM
To: dev@age.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence

The community should have a discussion about the need for a docker image of
AGE Viewer before we vote on it.

A docker image of AGE Viewer will ease the adoption of AGE for graph
related problems. It makes it so that a user of AGE Viewer does not have to
have intimate knowledge of: Postgres, AGE, NodeJs and React before they can
get all the components to work together. I think having a docker image of
AGE-Viewer is a great idea.

In reference to the links: Docker is not a replacement for Apache releases,
and should not be considered as such.

What support model do you think is going to be needed for this? Giving
people a method of visualizing their data in the most convenient way
possible seems to be a good idea, but what do you think are the drawbacks
of this decision?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:32 AM Felix Cheung 
wrote:

> I’d suggest the community to have a discussion of the need. What support
> model that will be etc.
>
> Mentor “vote” is more a proxy of having a clear understanding in the
> community.
>
>
> 
> From: Joe Fagan 
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 10:14:42 PM
> To: dev@age.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
>
> Hi all, please vote to utilise dockerhub as a distribution method for
> Viewer as it is for AGE
>
> @Felix
>
> The direction from Infra team on the incubator AGE dockerhub request was...
> "Neither of these threads expressly confirm the project's desire to adopt
> DockerHub distribution, they are just discussions about issues related to
> it. Please have your project mentors evaluate and approve the requested
> distribution method."
>
> Can I ask you to either vote, or evaluate and approve the
> dockerhub distribution method for Viewer too, whichever is most
> appropriate, or give further specific advice.
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 05:59, Felix Cheung 
> wrote:
>
> > I guess I’m linking to myself. I see infra asks for mentor, but as a
> > community you should just have a vote. You can explicitly ask a mentor to
> > vote too
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxzo04gxxkqvmtw7rmzkw8t2d8cf3nwo
> > 
> > From: Felix Cheung 
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 9:51:05 PM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
> >
> > Shouldn’t this be a vote?
> >
> > Please see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-22356
> > 
> > From: Joe Fagan 
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 7:34:36 AM
> > To: dev@age.apache.org 
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence
> >
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > We would like to have an image for Incubator AGE Viewer at
> hub.docker.com.
> > Is it possible to approve the creation of
> > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/age-viewer
> > <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/ageviewer>
> >
> > We will not require push access to this and can instead use automated
> build
> > based on tags in the https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer
> > repository.
> >
> > Once we have your approval we will raise a ticket on JIRA to the Infra
> Team
> > with the relevant details.
> >
> > Thank you
> > Joe
> >
>