Re: Upgrade Java Version

[Christie, Marcus Aaron]

Thanks for this summary of the work involved. Also kudos to you as well for 
making this possible.

> On Dec 6, 2019, at 5:10 PM, DImuthu Upeksha  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> We have upgraded java version to 11 with OpenJDK in development branch and 
> successfully deployed it in development environment. Following changes were 
> performed in the process
> 
> 1. Upgrades of compiler plugin (3.5.1 -> 3.8.0) , surefire plugin (2.18.1 -> 
> 3.0.0-M1), open jpa (2.4.3 -> 3.1.0). See PR 236 [3]
> 2. Adding javax dependencies explicitly as they were discontinued in default 
> java 11 releases. See PR 234 [4]
> 3. Updating JDK to OpenJDK 11 [5]
> 4. Disabling Dozer mapper setter optimization [6]. This is a temporary fix 
> and waiting for dozer team [7] to properly fix this. 
> 5. Fixing remote debug [8]
> 6. Minor test failure fixes [9]
> 7. Upgrading Confluent/ Kafka version to (4.1.0 -> 5.3.0) [10]
> 
> Travis build and develop environment are now stable :)
> 
> Kudos to Isuru, Marcus and Suresh for pulling this off.  
> 
> [3] https://github.com/apache/airavata/pull/236/files 
> 
> [4] https://github.com/apache/airavata/pull/234/files 
> 
> [5] 
> https://github.com/apache/airavata/commit/fd56623e303e579d7974b721ecd7f931498ad502
>  
> 
> [6] 
> https://github.com/DImuthuUpe/dozer/commit/4d33729e866982cb7cee61065f0719c9c1212334
>  
> 
> [7] 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/dozer-mapper/c1OPee1DwTw 
> 
> [8] 
> https://github.com/apache/airavata/commit/5fb5629dfaaf503e1875737c58f703e5cdfad255
>  
> 
> [9] 
> https://github.com/apache/airavata/commit/7b1a2b3525f93a7057325b9df1e7251282e5294f
>  
> 
> [10] 
> https://github.com/apache/airavata/commit/0859211fd8bfb8e2168e95d711fd27d83133c939
>  
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Dimuthu
> 
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 1:49 PM Suresh Marru  > wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I posted a question for Apache Legal - 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-484 
> 
> 
> + 1 for moving to Java 11 and get the Travis build working again. We probably 
> should try it against both OpenJDK and Oracle JDK latest 11 releases. 
> 
> Suresh
> 
>> On Oct 21, 2019, at 4:34 PM, Christie, Marcus Aaron > > wrote:
>> 
>> Might be good to ask Apache legal, but it's not like we're distributing 
>> Oracle JDK, so not sure what kind of guidance they could give.
>> 
>> In the meantime, it would be great to get the Travis build working again.
>> 
>>> On Oct 21, 2019, at 4:07 PM, DImuthu Upeksha >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Folks,
>>> 
>>> What should we do about this? Should we contact Apache legal support to get 
>>> things clarified about the licensing? We might need to stick to a decision 
>>> before next release.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Dimuthu
>> 
> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Upgrade Java Version

[DImuthu Upeksha]

Hi Folks,

We have upgraded java version to 11 with OpenJDK in development branch and
successfully deployed it in development environment. Following changes were
performed in the process

1. Upgrades of compiler plugin (3.5.1 -> 3.8.0) , surefire plugin (2.18.1
-> 3.0.0-M1), open jpa (2.4.3 -> 3.1.0). See PR 236 [3]
2. Adding javax dependencies explicitly as they were discontinued in
default java 11 releases. See PR 234 [4]
3. Updating JDK to OpenJDK 11 [5]
4. Disabling Dozer mapper setter optimization [6]. This is a temporary fix
and waiting for dozer team [7] to properly fix this.
5. Fixing remote debug [8]
6. Minor test failure fixes [9]
7. Upgrading Confluent/ Kafka version to (4.1.0 -> 5.3.0) [10]

Travis build and develop environment are now stable :)

Kudos to Isuru, Marcus and Suresh for pulling this off.

[3] https://github.com/apache/airavata/pull/236/files
[4] https://github.com/apache/airavata/pull/234/files
[5]
https://github.com/apache/airavata/commit/fd56623e303e579d7974b721ecd7f931498ad502
[6]
https://github.com/DImuthuUpe/dozer/commit/4d33729e866982cb7cee61065f0719c9c1212334
[7]
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/dozer-mapper/c1OPee1DwTw
[8]
https://github.com/apache/airavata/commit/5fb5629dfaaf503e1875737c58f703e5cdfad255
[9]
https://github.com/apache/airavata/commit/7b1a2b3525f93a7057325b9df1e7251282e5294f
[10]
https://github.com/apache/airavata/commit/0859211fd8bfb8e2168e95d711fd27d83133c939

Thanks
Dimuthu

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 1:49 PM Suresh Marru  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I posted a question for Apache Legal -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-484
>
> + 1 for moving to Java 11 and get the Travis build working again. We
> probably should try it against both OpenJDK and Oracle JDK latest 11
> releases.
>
> Suresh
>
> On Oct 21, 2019, at 4:34 PM, Christie, Marcus Aaron 
> wrote:
>
> Might be good to ask Apache legal, but it's not like we're distributing
> Oracle JDK, so not sure what kind of guidance they could give.
>
> In the meantime, it would be great to get the Travis build working again.
>
> On Oct 21, 2019, at 4:07 PM, DImuthu Upeksha 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> What should we do about this? Should we contact Apache legal support to
> get things clarified about the licensing? We might need to stick to a
> decision before next release.
>
> Thanks
> Dimuthu
>
>
>
>

Re: Upgrade Java Version

[Suresh Marru]

Hi All,

I posted a question for Apache Legal - 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-484 


+ 1 for moving to Java 11 and get the Travis build working again. We probably 
should try it against both OpenJDK and Oracle JDK latest 11 releases. 

Suresh

> On Oct 21, 2019, at 4:34 PM, Christie, Marcus Aaron  wrote:
> 
> Might be good to ask Apache legal, but it's not like we're distributing 
> Oracle JDK, so not sure what kind of guidance they could give.
> 
> In the meantime, it would be great to get the Travis build working again.
> 
>> On Oct 21, 2019, at 4:07 PM, DImuthu Upeksha  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Folks,
>> 
>> What should we do about this? Should we contact Apache legal support to get 
>> things clarified about the licensing? We might need to stick to a decision 
>> before next release.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Dimuthu
> 

Re: Upgrade Java Version

[Christie, Marcus Aaron]

Might be good to ask Apache legal, but it's not like we're distributing Oracle 
JDK, so not sure what kind of guidance they could give.

In the meantime, it would be great to get the Travis build working again.

> On Oct 21, 2019, at 4:07 PM, DImuthu Upeksha  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> What should we do about this? Should we contact Apache legal support to get 
> things clarified about the licensing? We might need to stick to a decision 
> before next release.
> 
> Thanks
> Dimuthu



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Upgrade Java Version

[DImuthu Upeksha]

Hi Folks,

What should we do about this? Should we contact Apache legal support to get
things clarified about the licensing? We might need to stick to a decision
before next release.

Thanks
Dimuthu

Re: Upgrade Java Version

[DImuthu Upeksha]

Will this [2] be an issue for future releases? Seems like Oracle JDK/ JRE
11 no longer comes free for production deployments. I'm not sure how it
affects for open source projects

[2]
https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk11-downloads-5066655.html

Thanks
Dimuthu

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:58 AM Christie, Marcus Aaron 
wrote:

> +1 for Java 11
>
> On Sep 12, 2019, at 10:28 AM, Suresh Marru  wrote:
>
> + 1 for Java 11.
>
> Any objections to move forward to make Java 11 minimum requirement?
>
> Suresh
>
> On Sep 10, 2019, at 6:06 PM, DImuthu Upeksha 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Suresh,
>
> I would vote for Java 11 as it's relatively mature and a LTS version [1]
>
> [1] https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/java-se-support-roadmap.html
>
> Thanks
> Dimuthu
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:34 AM Suresh Marru  wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I noticed a travis build fail which complains minimum have required of 9
>> to 12 - “Expected feature release number in range of 9 to 14, but got: 8”.
>>
>> Any thoughts on which version of JDK we should upgrade Airavata to before
>> next release?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Suresh
>
>
>
>

Re: Upgrade Java Version

[Christie, Marcus Aaron]

+1 for Java 11

> On Sep 12, 2019, at 10:28 AM, Suresh Marru  wrote:
> 
> + 1 for Java 11.
> 
> Any objections to move forward to make Java 11 minimum requirement? 
> 
> Suresh
> 
>> On Sep 10, 2019, at 6:06 PM, DImuthu Upeksha > > wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Suresh,
>> 
>> I would vote for Java 11 as it's relatively mature and a LTS version [1]
>> 
>> [1] https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/java-se-support-roadmap.html 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Dimuthu
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:34 AM Suresh Marru > > wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I noticed a travis build fail which complains minimum have required of 9 to 
>> 12 - “Expected feature release number in range of 9 to 14, but got: 8”.
>> 
>> Any thoughts on which version of JDK we should upgrade Airavata to before 
>> next release?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Suresh
> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Upgrade Java Version

[Suresh Marru]

+ 1 for Java 11.

Any objections to move forward to make Java 11 minimum requirement? 

Suresh

> On Sep 10, 2019, at 6:06 PM, DImuthu Upeksha  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Suresh,
> 
> I would vote for Java 11 as it's relatively mature and a LTS version [1]
> 
> [1] https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/java-se-support-roadmap.html 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Dimuthu
> 
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:34 AM Suresh Marru  > wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I noticed a travis build fail which complains minimum have required of 9 to 
> 12 - “Expected feature release number in range of 9 to 14, but got: 8”.
> 
> Any thoughts on which version of JDK we should upgrade Airavata to before 
> next release?
> 
> Cheers,
> Suresh

Re: Upgrade Java Version

[DImuthu Upeksha]

Hi Suresh,

I would vote for Java 11 as it's relatively mature and a LTS version [1]

[1] https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/java-se-support-roadmap.html

Thanks
Dimuthu

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:34 AM Suresh Marru  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I noticed a travis build fail which complains minimum have required of 9
> to 12 - “Expected feature release number in range of 9 to 14, but got: 8”.
>
> Any thoughts on which version of JDK we should upgrade Airavata to before
> next release?
>
> Cheers,
> Suresh

Upgrade Java Version

[Suresh Marru]

Hi All,

I noticed a travis build fail which complains minimum have required of 9 to 12 
- “Expected feature release number in range of 9 to 14, but got: 8”.

Any thoughts on which version of JDK we should upgrade Airavata to before next 
release?

Cheers,
Suresh