Re: Initial Committers Roll Call

[Benjamin Young]

Fabulous, Steve! Thank you. :)


We've started working on getting our initial committers up (above 2...now at 
4!) so that we can hold proper votes for the project. We've got an active 
contributor who we'd like to vote in, and haven't been able to yet--my guess is 
it'd be the same for getting you added to the PPMC? I'm not sure how that works 
in incubation.


I'm also working on how the PPMC "joining" works for folks on that "initial 
committers" list. My first goal is just to get everyone from that list (who 
still wants to) on the actual committers list.


Regardless of the details of making it happen, I'm thankful for your offer to 
help, Steve!

Benjamin


--

http://bigbluehat.com/

http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung


From: Steve Blackmon <sblack...@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 10:31:29 AM
To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Initial Committers Roll Call

I don’t do javascript but I’ll participate on the Annotator PPMC to help
the project through incubation.

sblack...@apache.org
AID: sblackmon

On Mar 28, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Benjamin Young <bigblue...@apache.org> wrote:


Thanks to everyone who +1'd this last month!

I've just (officially) added two of our "initial committers" to our list:
- Robert - https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=robcast
- Dinesh - https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=tbdinesh

That gives us 5 (counting Jim who's also a Mentor) of the 14 initial
committers listed in our original proposal--so, 9 more to go! :D
https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal#initial-commiters

If you're name is on that list, and you are still interested in
participating here (in anyway, not just code), we *need* you to go through
the steps described here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-for-new-committers

Once you've done that, please let me know (on this list is fine) what your
Apache ID name is (ex. `bigbluehat`) so that I can get you properly added
to our list of committers.

I'll be sending more mails out this week about plans for the future and how
we can (together!) make those a reality (at last!!1!). :)

More soon,
Benjamin

On 2018/02/13 04:45:38, Jake Hartnell <j...@commongarden.org> wrote:

+1 excited for the future of annotation!

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Tushar Choubisa <smiley...@gmail.com>
wrote:

+1

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Joshua Choi <js_c...@icloud.com> wrote:

+1—I’ve been busy with medical school, but I still wish to help out as
well as I can.

On Feb 6, 2018, at 9:30 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:

+1

On Feb 2, 2018, at 1:49 PM, Benjamin Young <byo...@bigbluehat.com>

wrote:


Hi all!

This email is primarily for the folks who "signed up" to be initial

committers during the Apache Annotator Proposal process [1] (each of whom
are BCC'd on this email).


It's possible that some of you forgot you'd added your name to that

list, or that now (given the life and work and time) you may no longer

have

an interest in participating, or you may have been eagerly awaiting this

to

happen and somehow missed the initial setup of the project. Regardless,
we'd love to have you join the party! :)


Here's a quick update, and also some links to get setup as one of the

core contributors to Apache Annotator [2].


First, coding is coming along nicely mostly with thanks going to

Randall and Gerben [3]. The primary focus has been on repository

structure

(monorepo), initial code structure/planning, and NPM publication
planning/setup. If you're interested in any of this, please checkout the
code repo.


Second, there's a basic promo site (if you've not seen it) at

http://annotator.apache.org/ <http://annotator.apache.org/> We'd like to
get the demo integrated [4] and begin to provide documentation there as
we're able to write it (and would love help writing it!). ^_^


Lastly (and this is where our BCC'd friends come in!), we need more

initial committers active (at least!) on the mailing list. We have folks
interested in contributing to the code who we can't (yet) add to the
project because we lack voting members. If you are able and willing (or
even just able ;) ), we'd greatly appreciate the help and input on the
mailing list, even if you lack time to code or write docs (etc).


If you're +1 on accepting the role you signed up for as an initial

committer, please respond (on list!) to this email and begin
reading/skimming this guide:

http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-

for-new-committers <http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#
guide-for-new-committers>


It can be a lot to take in, but I (and our loverly mentors) will be

happy to help you through the process. :)


Thank you (all!) for reading this email!
Benjamin

[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal <

htt

Re: Initial Committers Roll Call

[Steve Blackmon]

I don’t do javascript but I’ll participate on the Annotator PPMC to help
the project through incubation.

sblack...@apache.org
AID: sblackmon

On Mar 28, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Benjamin Young  wrote:


Thanks to everyone who +1'd this last month!

I've just (officially) added two of our "initial committers" to our list:
- Robert - https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=robcast
- Dinesh - https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=tbdinesh

That gives us 5 (counting Jim who's also a Mentor) of the 14 initial
committers listed in our original proposal--so, 9 more to go! :D
https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal#initial-commiters

If you're name is on that list, and you are still interested in
participating here (in anyway, not just code), we *need* you to go through
the steps described here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-for-new-committers

Once you've done that, please let me know (on this list is fine) what your
Apache ID name is (ex. `bigbluehat`) so that I can get you properly added
to our list of committers.

I'll be sending more mails out this week about plans for the future and how
we can (together!) make those a reality (at last!!1!). :)

More soon,
Benjamin

On 2018/02/13 04:45:38, Jake Hartnell  wrote:

+1 excited for the future of annotation!

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Tushar Choubisa 
wrote:

+1

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Joshua Choi  wrote:

+1—I’ve been busy with medical school, but I still wish to help out as
well as I can.

On Feb 6, 2018, at 9:30 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

+1

On Feb 2, 2018, at 1:49 PM, Benjamin Young 

wrote:


Hi all!

This email is primarily for the folks who "signed up" to be initial

committers during the Apache Annotator Proposal process [1] (each of whom
are BCC'd on this email).


It's possible that some of you forgot you'd added your name to that

list, or that now (given the life and work and time) you may no longer

have

an interest in participating, or you may have been eagerly awaiting this

to

happen and somehow missed the initial setup of the project. Regardless,
we'd love to have you join the party! :)


Here's a quick update, and also some links to get setup as one of the

core contributors to Apache Annotator [2].


First, coding is coming along nicely mostly with thanks going to

Randall and Gerben [3]. The primary focus has been on repository

structure

(monorepo), initial code structure/planning, and NPM publication
planning/setup. If you're interested in any of this, please checkout the
code repo.


Second, there's a basic promo site (if you've not seen it) at

http://annotator.apache.org/  We'd like to
get the demo integrated [4] and begin to provide documentation there as
we're able to write it (and would love help writing it!). ^_^


Lastly (and this is where our BCC'd friends come in!), we need more

initial committers active (at least!) on the mailing list. We have folks
interested in contributing to the code who we can't (yet) add to the
project because we lack voting members. If you are able and willing (or
even just able ;) ), we'd greatly appreciate the help and input on the
mailing list, even if you lack time to code or write docs (etc).


If you're +1 on accepting the role you signed up for as an initial

committer, please respond (on list!) to this email and begin
reading/skimming this guide:

http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-

for-new-committers 


It can be a lot to take in, but I (and our loverly mentors) will be

happy to help you through the process. :)


Thank you (all!) for reading this email!
Benjamin

[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal <

https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal>

[2] http://annotator.apache.org/ 
[3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator <

https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator>

[4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/18 <

https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/18>



--
http://bigbluehat.com/ 
http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung 

Re: Initial Committers Roll Call

[Benjamin Young]

Thanks to everyone who +1'd this last month!

I've just (officially) added two of our "initial committers" to our list:
- Robert - https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=robcast
- Dinesh - https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=tbdinesh

That gives us 5 (counting Jim who's also a Mentor) of the 14 initial committers 
listed in our original proposal--so, 9 more to go! :D
https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal#initial-commiters

If you're name is on that list, and you are still interested in participating 
here (in anyway, not just code), we *need* you to go through the steps 
described here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-for-new-committers

Once you've done that, please let me know (on this list is fine) what your 
Apache ID name is (ex. `bigbluehat`) so that I can get you properly added to 
our list of committers.

I'll be sending more mails out this week about plans for the future and how we 
can (together!) make those a reality (at last!!1!). :)

More soon,
Benjamin

On 2018/02/13 04:45:38, Jake Hartnell  wrote: 
> +1 excited for the future of annotation!
> 
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Tushar Choubisa 
> wrote:
> 
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Joshua Choi  wrote:
> >
> > > +1—I’ve been busy with medical school, but I still wish to help out as
> > > well as I can.
> > >
> > > > On Feb 6, 2018, at 9:30 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > >> On Feb 2, 2018, at 1:49 PM, Benjamin Young 
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi all!
> > > >>
> > > >> This email is primarily for the folks who "signed up" to be initial
> > > committers during the Apache Annotator Proposal process [1] (each of whom
> > > are BCC'd on this email).
> > > >>
> > > >> It's possible that some of you forgot you'd added your name to that
> > > list, or that now (given the life and work and time) you may no longer
> > have
> > > an interest in participating, or you may have been eagerly awaiting this
> > to
> > > happen and somehow missed the initial setup of the project. Regardless,
> > > we'd love to have you join the party! :)
> > > >>
> > > >> Here's a quick update, and also some links to get setup as one of the
> > > core contributors to Apache Annotator [2].
> > > >>
> > > >> First, coding is coming along nicely mostly with thanks going to
> > > Randall and Gerben [3]. The primary focus has been on repository
> > structure
> > > (monorepo), initial code structure/planning, and NPM publication
> > > planning/setup. If you're interested in any of this, please checkout the
> > > code repo.
> > > >>
> > > >> Second, there's a basic promo site (if you've not seen it) at
> > > http://annotator.apache.org/  We'd like to
> > > get the demo integrated [4] and begin to provide documentation there as
> > > we're able to write it (and would love help writing it!). ^_^
> > > >>
> > > >> Lastly (and this is where our BCC'd friends come in!), we need more
> > > initial committers active (at least!) on the mailing list. We have folks
> > > interested in contributing to the code who we can't (yet) add to the
> > > project because we lack voting members. If you are able and willing (or
> > > even just able ;) ), we'd greatly appreciate the help and input on the
> > > mailing list, even if you lack time to code or write docs (etc).
> > > >>
> > > >> If you're +1 on accepting the role you signed up for as an initial
> > > committer, please respond (on list!) to this email and begin
> > > reading/skimming this guide:
> > > >> http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-
> > > for-new-committers  > > guide-for-new-committers>
> > > >>
> > > >> It can be a lot to take in, but I (and our loverly mentors) will be
> > > happy to help you through the process. :)
> > > >>
> > > >> Thank you (all!) for reading this email!
> > > >> Benjamin
> > > >>
> > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal <
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal>
> > > >> [2] http://annotator.apache.org/ 
> > > >> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator <
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator>
> > > >> [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/18 <
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/18>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> http://bigbluehat.com/ 
> > > >> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung  > > benjaminyoung>
> > >
> >
> 

Re: Initial Committers Roll Call

[Tushar Choubisa]

+1

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 9:01 PM, Joshua Choi  wrote:

> +1—I’ve been busy with medical school, but I still wish to help out as
> well as I can.
>
> > On Feb 6, 2018, at 9:30 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> >> On Feb 2, 2018, at 1:49 PM, Benjamin Young 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all!
> >>
> >> This email is primarily for the folks who "signed up" to be initial
> committers during the Apache Annotator Proposal process [1] (each of whom
> are BCC'd on this email).
> >>
> >> It's possible that some of you forgot you'd added your name to that
> list, or that now (given the life and work and time) you may no longer have
> an interest in participating, or you may have been eagerly awaiting this to
> happen and somehow missed the initial setup of the project. Regardless,
> we'd love to have you join the party! :)
> >>
> >> Here's a quick update, and also some links to get setup as one of the
> core contributors to Apache Annotator [2].
> >>
> >> First, coding is coming along nicely mostly with thanks going to
> Randall and Gerben [3]. The primary focus has been on repository structure
> (monorepo), initial code structure/planning, and NPM publication
> planning/setup. If you're interested in any of this, please checkout the
> code repo.
> >>
> >> Second, there's a basic promo site (if you've not seen it) at
> http://annotator.apache.org/  We'd like to
> get the demo integrated [4] and begin to provide documentation there as
> we're able to write it (and would love help writing it!). ^_^
> >>
> >> Lastly (and this is where our BCC'd friends come in!), we need more
> initial committers active (at least!) on the mailing list. We have folks
> interested in contributing to the code who we can't (yet) add to the
> project because we lack voting members. If you are able and willing (or
> even just able ;) ), we'd greatly appreciate the help and input on the
> mailing list, even if you lack time to code or write docs (etc).
> >>
> >> If you're +1 on accepting the role you signed up for as an initial
> committer, please respond (on list!) to this email and begin
> reading/skimming this guide:
> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-
> for-new-committers  guide-for-new-committers>
> >>
> >> It can be a lot to take in, but I (and our loverly mentors) will be
> happy to help you through the process. :)
> >>
> >> Thank you (all!) for reading this email!
> >> Benjamin
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal>
> >> [2] http://annotator.apache.org/ 
> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator>
> >> [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/18 <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/18>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://bigbluehat.com/ 
> >> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung  benjaminyoung>
>

Re: Initial Committers Roll Call

[Joshua Choi]

+1—I’ve been busy with medical school, but I still wish to help out as well as 
I can.

> On Feb 6, 2018, at 9:30 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
>> On Feb 2, 2018, at 1:49 PM, Benjamin Young  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all!
>> 
>> This email is primarily for the folks who "signed up" to be initial 
>> committers during the Apache Annotator Proposal process [1] (each of whom 
>> are BCC'd on this email).
>> 
>> It's possible that some of you forgot you'd added your name to that list, or 
>> that now (given the life and work and time) you may no longer have an 
>> interest in participating, or you may have been eagerly awaiting this to 
>> happen and somehow missed the initial setup of the project. Regardless, we'd 
>> love to have you join the party! :)
>> 
>> Here's a quick update, and also some links to get setup as one of the core 
>> contributors to Apache Annotator [2].
>> 
>> First, coding is coming along nicely mostly with thanks going to Randall and 
>> Gerben [3]. The primary focus has been on repository structure (monorepo), 
>> initial code structure/planning, and NPM publication planning/setup. If 
>> you're interested in any of this, please checkout the code repo.
>> 
>> Second, there's a basic promo site (if you've not seen it) at 
>> http://annotator.apache.org/  We'd like to get 
>> the demo integrated [4] and begin to provide documentation there as we're 
>> able to write it (and would love help writing it!). ^_^
>> 
>> Lastly (and this is where our BCC'd friends come in!), we need more initial 
>> committers active (at least!) on the mailing list. We have folks interested 
>> in contributing to the code who we can't (yet) add to the project because we 
>> lack voting members. If you are able and willing (or even just able ;) ), 
>> we'd greatly appreciate the help and input on the mailing list, even if you 
>> lack time to code or write docs (etc).
>> 
>> If you're +1 on accepting the role you signed up for as an initial 
>> committer, please respond (on list!) to this email and begin 
>> reading/skimming this guide:
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-for-new-committers 
>> 
>> 
>> It can be a lot to take in, but I (and our loverly mentors) will be happy to 
>> help you through the process. :)
>> 
>> Thank you (all!) for reading this email!
>> Benjamin
>> 
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal 
>> 
>> [2] http://annotator.apache.org/ 
>> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator 
>> 
>> [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/18 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> http://bigbluehat.com/ 
>> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung 

Re: Initial Committers Roll Call

[Jim Jagielski]

+1

> On Feb 2, 2018, at 1:49 PM, Benjamin Young  wrote:
> 
> Hi all!
> 
> This email is primarily for the folks who "signed up" to be initial 
> committers during the Apache Annotator Proposal process [1] (each of whom are 
> BCC'd on this email).
> 
> It's possible that some of you forgot you'd added your name to that list, or 
> that now (given the life and work and time) you may no longer have an 
> interest in participating, or you may have been eagerly awaiting this to 
> happen and somehow missed the initial setup of the project. Regardless, we'd 
> love to have you join the party! :)
> 
> Here's a quick update, and also some links to get setup as one of the core 
> contributors to Apache Annotator [2].
> 
> First, coding is coming along nicely mostly with thanks going to Randall and 
> Gerben [3]. The primary focus has been on repository structure (monorepo), 
> initial code structure/planning, and NPM publication planning/setup. If 
> you're interested in any of this, please checkout the code repo.
> 
> Second, there's a basic promo site (if you've not seen it) at 
> http://annotator.apache.org/  We'd like to get 
> the demo integrated [4] and begin to provide documentation there as we're 
> able to write it (and would love help writing it!). ^_^
> 
> Lastly (and this is where our BCC'd friends come in!), we need more initial 
> committers active (at least!) on the mailing list. We have folks interested 
> in contributing to the code who we can't (yet) add to the project because we 
> lack voting members. If you are able and willing (or even just able ;) ), 
> we'd greatly appreciate the help and input on the mailing list, even if you 
> lack time to code or write docs (etc).
> 
> If you're +1 on accepting the role you signed up for as an initial committer, 
> please respond (on list!) to this email and begin reading/skimming this guide:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-for-new-committers 
> 
> 
> It can be a lot to take in, but I (and our loverly mentors) will be happy to 
> help you through the process. :)
> 
> Thank you (all!) for reading this email!
> Benjamin
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal 
> 
> [2] http://annotator.apache.org/ 
> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator 
> 
> [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/18 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> http://bigbluehat.com/ 
> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung 

Re: Initial Committers Roll Call

[Robert Casties]

+1

...now for some spare time ;-)

Robert

On 02.02.18 19:49, Benjamin Young wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> 
> This email is primarily for the folks who "signed up" to be initial 
> committers during the Apache Annotator Proposal process [1] (each of whom are 
> BCC'd on this email).
> 
> 
> It's possible that some of you forgot you'd added your name to that list, or 
> that now (given the life and work and time) you may no longer have an 
> interest in participating, or you may have been eagerly awaiting this to 
> happen and somehow missed the initial setup of the project. Regardless, we'd 
> love to have you join the party! :)
> 
> 
> Here's a quick update, and also some links to get setup as one of the core 
> contributors to Apache Annotator [2].
> 
> 
> First, coding is coming along nicely mostly with thanks going to Randall and 
> Gerben [3]. The primary focus has been on repository structure (monorepo), 
> initial code structure/planning, and NPM publication planning/setup. If 
> you're interested in any of this, please checkout the code repo.
> 
> 
> Second, there's a basic promo site (if you've not seen it) at 
> http://annotator.apache.org/ We'd like to get the demo integrated [4] and 
> begin to provide documentation there as we're able to write it (and would 
> love help writing it!). ^_^
> 
> 
> Lastly (and this is where our BCC'd friends come in!), we need more initial 
> committers active (at least!) on the mailing list. We have folks interested 
> in contributing to the code who we can't (yet) add to the project because we 
> lack voting members. If you are able and willing (or even just able ;) ), 
> we'd greatly appreciate the help and input on the mailing list, even if you 
> lack time to code or write docs (etc).
> 
> 
> If you're +1 on accepting the role you signed up for as an initial committer, 
> please respond (on list!) to this email and begin reading/skimming this guide:
> 
> http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-for-new-committers
> 
> 
> It can be a lot to take in, but I (and our loverly mentors) will be happy to 
> help you through the process. :)
> 
> 
> Thank you (all!) for reading this email!
> 
> Benjamin
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal
> 
> [2] http://annotator.apache.org/
> 
> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator
> 
> [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/18
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> http://bigbluehat.com/
> 
> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
> 


-- 
Dr. Robert Casties -- Information Technology Group
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science
Boltzmannstr. 22, D-14195 Berlin
Tel: +49/30/22667-342 Fax: -299

Re: Initial Committers Roll Call

[Jonny Bradley]

Hi Benjamin

Er, +1 i think - but i don't remember having a role before... i'm mainly going 
to be integrating Annotator to Tiki (tiki.org) but might well have minor fixes 
etc to feed back, so i guess that means i'm +1?

Anyway, nice to see some activity i understand here, so well done and thanks 
for all the work it looks like this has taken!

jonny

p.s. We already have annoatator.js 1.2 in Tiki so are looking forward to having 
more flexibility and control over our annotations :)


> On 2 Feb 2018, at 19:49, Benjamin Young  wrote:
> 
> Hi all!
> 
> 
> This email is primarily for the folks who "signed up" to be initial 
> committers during the Apache Annotator Proposal process [1] (each of whom are 
> BCC'd on this email).
> 
> 
> It's possible that some of you forgot you'd added your name to that list, or 
> that now (given the life and work and time) you may no longer have an 
> interest in participating, or you may have been eagerly awaiting this to 
> happen and somehow missed the initial setup of the project. Regardless, we'd 
> love to have you join the party! :)
> 
> 
> Here's a quick update, and also some links to get setup as one of the core 
> contributors to Apache Annotator [2].
> 
> 
> First, coding is coming along nicely mostly with thanks going to Randall and 
> Gerben [3]. The primary focus has been on repository structure (monorepo), 
> initial code structure/planning, and NPM publication planning/setup. If 
> you're interested in any of this, please checkout the code repo.
> 
> 
> Second, there's a basic promo site (if you've not seen it) at 
> http://annotator.apache.org/ We'd like to get the demo integrated [4] and 
> begin to provide documentation there as we're able to write it (and would 
> love help writing it!). ^_^
> 
> 
> Lastly (and this is where our BCC'd friends come in!), we need more initial 
> committers active (at least!) on the mailing list. We have folks interested 
> in contributing to the code who we can't (yet) add to the project because we 
> lack voting members. If you are able and willing (or even just able ;) ), 
> we'd greatly appreciate the help and input on the mailing list, even if you 
> lack time to code or write docs (etc).
> 
> 
> If you're +1 on accepting the role you signed up for as an initial committer, 
> please respond (on list!) to this email and begin reading/skimming this guide:
> 
> http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-for-new-committers
> 
> 
> It can be a lot to take in, but I (and our loverly mentors) will be happy to 
> help you through the process. :)
> 
> 
> Thank you (all!) for reading this email!
> 
> Benjamin
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal
> 
> [2] http://annotator.apache.org/
> 
> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator
> 
> [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/18
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> http://bigbluehat.com/
> 
> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung

Re: Initial Committers Roll Call

[TB Dinesh]

+1

:)

On Feb 3, 2018 00:19, "Benjamin Young"  wrote:

> Hi all!
>
>
> This email is primarily for the folks who "signed up" to be initial
> committers during the Apache Annotator Proposal process [1] (each of whom
> are BCC'd on this email).
>
>
> It's possible that some of you forgot you'd added your name to that list,
> or that now (given the life and work and time) you may no longer have an
> interest in participating, or you may have been eagerly awaiting this to
> happen and somehow missed the initial setup of the project. Regardless,
> we'd love to have you join the party! :)
>
>
> Here's a quick update, and also some links to get setup as one of the core
> contributors to Apache Annotator [2].
>
>
> First, coding is coming along nicely mostly with thanks going to Randall
> and Gerben [3]. The primary focus has been on repository structure
> (monorepo), initial code structure/planning, and NPM publication
> planning/setup. If you're interested in any of this, please checkout the
> code repo.
>
>
> Second, there's a basic promo site (if you've not seen it) at
> http://annotator.apache.org/ We'd like to get the demo integrated [4] and
> begin to provide documentation there as we're able to write it (and would
> love help writing it!). ^_^
>
>
> Lastly (and this is where our BCC'd friends come in!), we need more
> initial committers active (at least!) on the mailing list. We have folks
> interested in contributing to the code who we can't (yet) add to the
> project because we lack voting members. If you are able and willing (or
> even just able ;) ), we'd greatly appreciate the help and input on the
> mailing list, even if you lack time to code or write docs (etc).
>
>
> If you're +1 on accepting the role you signed up for as an initial
> committer, please respond (on list!) to this email and begin
> reading/skimming this guide:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html#guide-
> for-new-committers
>
>
> It can be a lot to take in, but I (and our loverly mentors) will be happy
> to help you through the process. :)
>
>
> Thank you (all!) for reading this email!
>
> Benjamin
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Proposal
>
> [2] http://annotator.apache.org/
>
> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator
>
> [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/18
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://bigbluehat.com/
>
> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
>