Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : March 31st
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Since several committers seemed to want a bit more time for fixes, let's vote for Ant 1.6.3 rc1 on Thursday, March 31st. (and cancel the previous vote of course) +1 I'm going to check spelling of all the html docs over the next couple of days, I know that there are a couple of doc patches in bugzilla, could we roll them out for 1.6.3, as they are unlikely to break any builds ;-) Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doc spelling?
US or British spelling? Customize/Customise? Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[patch] ant in anger
- fixed broken links - fixed spelling - A - a - - quot; c Kev Index: ant_in_anger.html === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/ant/docs/ant_in_anger.html,v retrieving revision 1.17 diff -u -r1.17 ant_in_anger.html --- ant_in_anger.html 5 Mar 2004 10:35:38 - 1.17 +++ ant_in_anger.html 16 Mar 2005 04:24:11 - @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ h4 align=center Steve Loughranbr -Last updated 2002-11-09 +Last updated 2005-03-16 /h4 a name=introduction @@ -22,15 +22,15 @@ /a a href=http://ant.apache.org/;Apache Ant/a - can be an invaluable tool in a team development process -or it can + can be an invaluable tool in a team development process - or it can be yet another source of problems in that ongoing crises we call development . This document contains some strategies and tactics for making the most of Ant. It is moderately frivolous in places, and lacks almost any actual -examples of Ant xml. The lack of examples is entirely deliberate -it +examples of Ant XML. The lack of examples is entirely deliberate - it keeps document maintenance costs down. Most of the concepts covered -don't need the detail about XML representations, as it is processes we -are concerned about, not syntax. Finally, please be aware that the +don't need the detail provided by XML representations, as it is the processes we +are concerned about, not the syntax. Finally, please be aware that the comments here are only suggestions which need to be customised to meet your own needs, not strict rules about what should and should not be done. @@ -44,10 +44,10 @@ li Team efforts, usually with the petulant prima-donnas all us Java programmers become once we realise how much in demand we are. -li A fairly distributed development team -spread across locations and +li A fairly distributed development team - spread across locations and maybe time zones. -li Separate sub projects -from separate beans in a big +li Separate sub projects - from separate beans in a big enterprise application to separate enterprise applications which need to be vaguely aware of each other. @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ li Everyone is struggling to keep up with platform and tool evolution. li Extensive use of external libraries, both open and closed source. - /ul What that all means is that there is no time to spend getting things @@ -74,21 +73,19 @@ h3 Clarify what you want Ant to do/h3 - Ant is not a silver bullet. It is just another rusty bullet in the armory of development tools available at your disposal. Its primary purpose is to accelerate the construction and deployment of Java projects. You could certainly extend Ant to do anything Java makes possible: it is easy to imagine writing an image processing task to help in web site deployment by shrinking and recompressing jpeg files, for example. But that would be pushing the boundary of -what Ant is really intended to do -so should be considered with care. - -P +what Ant is really intended to do - so should be considered with care. +p Ant is also a great adjunct to an IDE; a way of doing all the housekeeping of deployment and for clean, automated builds. But a good modern IDE is a -productivity tool in its own right -one you should consider keeping using. Ant -just lets you give the teams somewhat more freedom in IDE choice -quot;you can +productivity tool in its own right - one you should continue to use. Ant +just lets you give the teams somewhat more freedom in IDE choice - quot;you can use whatever you want in development, but Ant for the deployment buildsquot; Now that many modern open source and commercial IDEs include Ant support (including jEdit, Forte, Eclipse and IDEA), @@ -99,18 +96,17 @@ Define standard targets /h3 - When you have multiple sub projects, define a standard set of targets. Projects with a split between interface and implementation jar files -could consider bimpl/b and bintf/b targets -with separate -bdebug-impl/band bdebug-intf/b targets for the debug version. +could consider bimpl/b and bintf/b targets - with separate +bdebug-impl/b and bdebug-intf/b targets for the debug version. And of course, the ubiquitous bclean/b target. -P +p With standard target names, it is easy to build encompassing Ant build files which just hand off the work to the classes below using the -a href=manual/CoreTasks/ant.htmllt;antgt;/a +a href=manual/CoreTasks/ant.htmlant/a task. For example. the clean target could be handed down to the ttintf/tt and ttimpl/tt subdirectories from a parent directory @@ -138,31 +134,29 @@ a href=manual/CoreTasks/exec.htmlexec/a and a href=manual/CoreTasks/java.htmljava/a tasks or a href=manual/OptionalTasks/script.htmlinline scripting/a to extend it. In a -project with many build.xml files, you soon find that having a single +project with many ttbuild.xml/tt files, you soon find that having a single central place for implementing the functionality keeps
cvs commit: ant/docs ant_in_anger.html
antoine 2005/03/15 22:03:53 Modified:docs ant_in_anger.html Log: spelling patch by Kev Jackson Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +136 -202 ant/docs/ant_in_anger.html Index: ant_in_anger.html === RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/docs/ant_in_anger.html,v retrieving revision 1.17 retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.17 -r1.18 --- ant_in_anger.html 5 Mar 2004 10:35:38 - 1.17 +++ ant_in_anger.html 16 Mar 2005 06:03:52 - 1.18 @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ h4 align=center Steve Loughranbr -Last updated 2002-11-09 +Last updated 2005-03-16 /h4 a name=introduction @@ -22,15 +22,15 @@ /a a href=http://ant.apache.org/;Apache Ant/a - can be an invaluable tool in a team development process -or it can + can be an invaluable tool in a team development process - or it can be yet another source of problems in that ongoing crises we call development . This document contains some strategies and tactics for making the most of Ant. It is moderately frivolous in places, and lacks almost any actual -examples of Ant xml. The lack of examples is entirely deliberate -it +examples of Ant XML. The lack of examples is entirely deliberate - it keeps document maintenance costs down. Most of the concepts covered -don't need the detail about XML representations, as it is processes we -are concerned about, not syntax. Finally, please be aware that the +don't need the detail provided by XML representations, as it is the processes we +are concerned about, not the syntax. Finally, please be aware that the comments here are only suggestions which need to be customised to meet your own needs, not strict rules about what should and should not be done. @@ -44,10 +44,10 @@ li Team efforts, usually with the petulant prima-donnas all us Java programmers become once we realise how much in demand we are. -li A fairly distributed development team -spread across locations and +li A fairly distributed development team - spread across locations and maybe time zones. -li Separate sub projects -from separate beans in a big +li Separate sub projects - from separate beans in a big enterprise application to separate enterprise applications which need to be vaguely aware of each other. @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ li Everyone is struggling to keep up with platform and tool evolution. li Extensive use of external libraries, both open and closed source. - /ul What that all means is that there is no time to spend getting things @@ -74,21 +73,19 @@ h3 Clarify what you want Ant to do/h3 - Ant is not a silver bullet. It is just another rusty bullet in the armory of development tools available at your disposal. Its primary purpose is to accelerate the construction and deployment of Java projects. You could certainly extend Ant to do anything Java makes possible: it is easy to imagine writing an image processing task to help in web site deployment by shrinking and recompressing jpeg files, for example. But that would be pushing the boundary of -what Ant is really intended to do -so should be considered with care. - -P +what Ant is really intended to do - so should be considered with care. +p Ant is also a great adjunct to an IDE; a way of doing all the housekeeping of deployment and for clean, automated builds. But a good modern IDE is a -productivity tool in its own right -one you should consider keeping using. Ant -just lets you give the teams somewhat more freedom in IDE choice -quot;you can +productivity tool in its own right - one you should continue to use. Ant +just lets you give the teams somewhat more freedom in IDE choice - quot;you can use whatever you want in development, but Ant for the deployment buildsquot; Now that many modern open source and commercial IDEs include Ant support (including jEdit, Forte, Eclipse and IDEA), @@ -99,18 +96,17 @@ Define standard targets /h3 - When you have multiple sub projects, define a standard set of targets. Projects with a split between interface and implementation jar files -could consider bimpl/b and bintf/b targets -with separate -bdebug-impl/band bdebug-intf/b targets for the debug version. +could consider bimpl/b and bintf/b targets - with separate +bdebug-impl/b and bdebug-intf/b targets for the debug version. And of course, the ubiquitous bclean/b target. -P +p With standard target names, it is easy to build encompassing Ant build files which just hand off the work to the classes below using the -a href=manual/CoreTasks/ant.htmllt;antgt;/a +a href=manual/CoreTasks/ant.htmlant/a task. For example. the clean target could be handed down to the ttintf/tt and ttimpl/tt subdirectories from a parent directory @@ -138,31 +134,29 @@ a
Re: [patch] ant in anger
Good morning Kev, patch submitted, thanks, Antoine Levy-Lambert Kev Jackson wrote: - fixed broken links - fixed spelling - A - a - - quot; c Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [patch] ant in anger
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Good morning Kev, Good afternoon (just after lunch here :) I'll look at the other docs as I get the time. Fixing typos/broken links is really low-hanging fruit and I can get to a few of these before March 31st, so why not? Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : Marc h 31st
Since several committers seemed to want a bit more time for fixes, let's vote for Ant 1.6.3 rc1 on Thursday, March 31st. (and cancel the previous vote of course) [ ] Yes [ ] No Let me begin with my +1 +1 Jan
AW: Doc spelling?
AFAIK we have no strictly rule about that. I would use customize - but I also would understand the other :-) Mmmh ... there was a thread about that ... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-devm=107796038614327w=2 Jan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Kev Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 16. März 2005 04:22 An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Doc spelling? US or British spelling? Customize/Customise? Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34029] New: - Invalid initial heap size: -Xms64m -Xmx512m Could not create Java Virtual Machine
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34029.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34029
Summary: Invalid initial heap size: -Xms64m -Xmx512m Could not
create Java Virtual Machine
Product: Ant
Version: 1.5
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Build Process
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i m using jdk1.5.0_01 if i user java.exe of jdk1.5.0_01 then i m getting the
following error Invalid initial heap size: -Xms64m -Xmx512m Could not create
Java Virtual Machine. But if i run java.exe in the command prompt with the same
jvm arguments. its not giving any problem. is this the bug in ant or i m doing
any mistake. Following the target
target name=generateActionsXml depends=init
echo+---
+/echo
echo|
|/echo
echo| G E N E R A T E C U D S F X M L
|/echo
echo|
|/echo
echo+---
+/echo
echoGenerating actions xml for ${ant.project.name}/echo
mkdir dir=${cdms.actionsxml.dir}/
java classname=com.trigent.core.codegen.CreateCUDSFXml
fork=true jvm=${jdk1.5.home}/bin/java.exe dir=${cdms.home}
jvmarg value=-Xms64m -Xmx512m/
sysproperty key=log4j.configuration value=cdms-
log4j.xml/
arg value=${cdms.actionsxml.dir}/
arg value=${cdms.actionsxmlschema.prefix}/
arg value=${cdms.datamodel.xml}/
classpath
path location=${cdms.src.dir}/
path location=${cdms.config.dir}/
path refid=cdms.class.path/
/classpath
/java
echoGenerated actions xml for ${ant.project.name}/echo
/target
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34029] - Invalid initial heap size: -Xms64m -Xmx512m Could not create Java Virtual Machine
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34029. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID Summary| Invalid initial heap size: |Invalid initial heap size: - |-Xms64m -Xmx512m Could not |Xms64m -Xmx512m Could not |create Java Virtual Machine |create Java Virtual Machine --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 08:12 --- jvmarg value=/ gets only ONE value - maybe with spaces. Use two jvmarg value=/ or a jvmarg line=/. As the manual sais ... -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Doc spelling?
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Kev Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: US or British spelling? Customize/Customise? We had the discussion once about spelled/spelt IIRC. Ant is one of the very few open source projects I know where the number of US committers is vastly outnumbered by people coming from other countries. AFAIU Australians are closer to British spelling and the French/Dutch/German[1] among us will probably have learnt British spelling in school (as if I'd recall what I've learnt there). Leave it as it is, I'd say. Stefan Footnotes: [1] if I've omitted somebody's home, I apologize - I just now realized that I don't know the origins of all committers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : March 31st
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since several committers seemed to want a bit more time for fixes, let's vote for Ant 1.6.3 rc1 on Thursday, March 31st. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: Doc spelling?
Leave it as it is, I'd say. Open to all? Main point is that you have to know what the author meant? Jan
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : March 31st
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Kev Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to check spelling of all the html docs over the next couple of days, I think there already is an open bug report with ispell results ... I know that there are a couple of doc patches in bugzilla, could we roll them out for 1.6.3, as they are unlikely to break any builds ;-) +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Doc spelling?
Kev Jackson wrote: US or British spelling? Customize/Customise? Both are acceptable. Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16871] - Javadoc task should quote files in generated file list
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16871. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 10:52 --- *** Bug 25349 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25868] - JAVAC debug=off attribute is inconsistent among jikes and javac compiler
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25868. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25868 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to modernize Jikes support?
Hi, when I added support for -bootclasspath to Jikes, we've already broken for oldish versions of Jikes. There are a couple of additional requests in Bugzilla that ask us to keep track of Jikes improvements, namely that we use -g:none in the case of debug=false and also support -extdirs. I see the following options to go ahead (names are open for discussion, of course): (1) move forward and assume all people use a modern version of jikes - this together with a note in WHATSNEW since it would break Ant on older jikes installations. (2) add a new compiler name oldjikes and enable the newer features only if jikes has been chosen instead of oldjikes - this together with a note in WHATSNEW since it would break Ant on older jikes installations. (3) add a new compiler name newjikes and enable the newer features only if newjikes has been chosen instead of jikes. So far I haven't checked which version of jikes added the new features, version 1.15 (released 2001) on my Linux box does support -bootclasspath but neither -g:none nor -extdirs. If it turns out that those two have been supported for more than a year or two, I'd go for (1) myself. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34031] New: - XMLProperty usage of FileUtils.getFileUtils()
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34031. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34031 Summary: XMLProperty usage of FileUtils.getFileUtils() Product: Ant Version: 1.6.2 Platform: All URL: http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/xmlproperty.html OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Core tasks AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] XMLProperty should probably use renamed FileUtils factory initialisation method private static final FileUtils FILE_UTILS = FileUtils.getFileUtils(); change to; private static final FileUtils FILE_UTILS = FileUtils.newFileUtils(); to get things to compile properly. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should we wait a few more days? Maybe yes. Of the 260+ reports that are real bug reports (not enhancement requests), there are 20 reports against optional SCM tasks nobody of us can test, 20 reports against J2EE tasks for containers nobody of us uses and around 10 against jspc and ejbjar each, which I don't use and don't have the environment or knowledge to test either. I could set up VSS and starteam support in a vmware image; perforce is also a freebie, leaving clearcase. If anyone else has VMWare *and* an MSDN license I could share with them the resulting image. JSPC needs to be deprecated; it wont work against 5.x, people should use tomcat's own. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Doc spelling?
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Kev Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: US or British spelling? Customize/Customise? We had the discussion once about spelled/spelt IIRC. Ant is one of the very few open source projects I know where the number of US committers is vastly outnumbered by people coming from other countries. AFAIU Australians are closer to British spelling and the French/Dutch/German[1] among us will probably have learnt British spelling in school (as if I'd recall what I've learnt there). Nowadays I try and use phrases that arent too divergent across locales, the misspelt is misspelled debacle showed why. Notice that the new unknown task diagnostics does *not* use either spelling. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26404] - jikes compiler adaptor doesn't support modern jikes options
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26404. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26404 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to modernize Jikes support?
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So far I haven't checked which version of jikes added the new features, version 1.15 (released 2001) on my Linux box does support -bootclasspath but neither -g:none nor -extdirs. Well, that's what it says, at least. Looking at the source[1], -extdirs and -sourcepath have been added for 1.14 and -g:* for 1.15 (together with -source and -target that we already support unconditionally in Jikes.java). Current is Jikes 1.22. With this I'm leaning towards supporting the new features in jikes unconditionally (and tell people to upgrade at least to 1.15 if they run into problems). Stefan Footnotes: [1] http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jikes/jikes/src/option.cpp?view=log - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JSPC needs to be deprecated; it wont work against 5.x, people should use tomcat's own. Which we already tell them in the manual - nevertheless, there will be people who still use Tomcat 4.x (me, for example, but I don't use jspc). Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Doc spelling?
Steve Loughran wrote: Nowadays I try and use phrases that arent too divergent across locales, the misspelt is misspelled debacle showed why. Notice that the new unknown task diagnostics does *not* use either spelling. Shouldn't that be unknown task diagnostics *do* not use either spelling? Aw, sorry - couldn't resist :) Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Future of Antidote?
Is there one? I'm leaning towards retiring antidote instead of moving it over to subversion. What are your thoughts? Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AW: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : Marc h 31st
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since several committers seemed to want a bit more time for fixes, let's vote for Ant 1.6.3 rc1 on Thursday, March 31st. (and cancel the previous vote of course) [ ] Yes [ ] No Let me begin with my +1 +1 Jan +1 Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Future of Antidote?
Stefan Bodewig wrote: Is there one? I'm leaning towards retiring antidote instead of moving it over to subversion. What are your thoughts? It's dead Jim. Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: Future of Antidote?
Nowadays most of the IDEs (all?) have an editor for Ant buildfiles. Antidote was touched 17 months ago (as I can see), for Jack Woehr´s I18N-patch. But I dont think that its much used and supported. So it would be a corpse in the repository. Same would be the Ant2-stuff. We have decided to work on 1.x, most of 2.x-thoughts are realized on 1.x-basis. Jan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 16. März 2005 11:58 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Future of Antidote? Is there one? I'm leaning towards retiring antidote instead of moving it over to subversion. What are your thoughts? Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 projects, and has been outstanding for 11 runs. The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'. For reference only, the following projects are affected by this: - test-ant-no-xerces : Java based build tool Full details are available at: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/ant/test-ant-no-xerces/index.html That said, some information snippets are provided here. The following annotations (debug/informational/warning/error messages) were provided: -INFO- Failed with reason build failed The following work was performed: http://brutus.apache.org/gump/public/ant/test-ant-no-xerces/gump_work/build_ant_test-ant-no-xerces.html Work Name: build_ant_test-ant-no-xerces (Type: Build) Work ended in a state of : Failed Elapsed: 6 mins 34 secs Command Line: java -Djava.awt.headless=true org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dgump.merge=/home/gump/workspaces2/public/gump/work/merge.xml -Dbuild.sysclasspath=only -Dtest.haltonfailure=false -Dant.home=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant/dist run-tests [Working Directory: /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/ant] CLASSPATH:
Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util CollectionUtils.java
Matt Benson wrote: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: peterreilly2005/03/14 01:14:56 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/util CollectionUtils.java Log: allow ant to compile with ant 1.5 again. Oops! :) Thanks! aah, it happens. my work project broke yesterday as someone added an int state variable with accessors on a class that extended Thread. But on java1.5, there is an enum State getState() in class thread. So no compile. And the week before, I put Boolean.valueOf(): boolean into code and broken Java1.4 builds. The 1.5 transition is not an easy one. -S. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : March 31st
Martijn Kruithof wrote: Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Since several committers seemed to want a bit more time for fixes, let's vote for Ant 1.6.3 rc1 on Thursday, March 31st. (and cancel the previous vote of course) [ ] Yes [ ] No Let me begin with my +1 I'm +1 too, hopefully this release will match the schedules of the IDEs. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Java 1.5.02 out
joy! http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/ReleaseNotes.html -nothing in there that gets attention; no mention of -source/-target fixes. Amusing to see one bug related to their makefile (!) for signing: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4987923 Everytime we do digital signing the RE has to sit in front the computer for 2 to 3 hours and type in the password 8 times. If there is any typo in the password, the process will fail and has to be restart all over again, which waste 2-3 hours of valuable time and delay the build. The implication being its easier to have someone sit in front of a release box for hours at a time, reentering passwords, than it is to fix the build process. I'm glad I dont have a process like that, as I know who'd be in front of the box... -Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19807] - CvsChangeLog to support revision tag parameter
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |1.6.1 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27419] - [PATCH] Add support for rlog and tag ranges to CvsChangeLog
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27419. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27419 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 16:34 --- why rlog as a parameter instead of command? tags are supported since 1.6.1, if you use the tag attribute. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27577] - Enhancement for CvsChangeLog
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27577. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27577 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 16:36 --- tags are supported since 1.6.1 via the tag attribute inherited from cvs. Maybe to explicit attributes are still better (given that this request occurs multiple times in bugzilla). Even though it is not strictly a duplicate, I'll mark it as such to have the different reports in a single place. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27419 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22567] - Enhance includes and excludes attributes for StarTeam Tasks to support by folder
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22567. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22567 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22709] - SOS tasks should allow forward slashes in vssserverpath
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22709. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22709 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18154] - Improve exceptions and logging behavior of p4change/p4counter/p4fstat/p4label
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20721] - no comment option for vsscheckout task
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20721. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20721 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33169] - ClearCase update produces verbose output---request standard output suppression feature
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33169. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33169 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29396] - Allow P4Change to edit changelists as well
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29396. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29396 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32545] - Add p4tag ant task for perforce optional tasks
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32545. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32545 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32129] - request to add purge, with recursive option command to VSS Optional Tasks
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32129. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32129 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18581] - ClearCase ChangeLog Task
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18581. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.6.3 release candidate - new date proposed : March 31st
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Since several committers seemed to want a bit more time for fixes, let's vote for Ant 1.6.3 rc1 on Thursday, March 31st. +1 -J. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] x22801 netbeans.org ant.apache.org if I had known it was harmless I would have killed it myself - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5789] - Enhanced PVCS task.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5789. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5789 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14930] - Ant task for a web based get for merent pvcs
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14930. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14930 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23440] - imporove native2ascii task for opensource JVM
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23440. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23440 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |1.6.3 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 16:46 --- native2ascii supports Kaffe's and CLASSPATH's version now, more backends can be added easily. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15550] - Internal Javadoc?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15550. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 16:47 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6599 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27419] - [PATCH] Add support for rlog and tag ranges to CvsChangeLog
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27419. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27419 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 16:47 --- Using tags on a working copy will only log changes between those tags on files that exist in your working copy. For this to accurately display the differences between those two tags, your working copy would have to be updated to the more recent tag. Running the command on the repository removed the need for this, in fact it removes the need for a working copy altogether. As to the remote option / rlog task question, it seems to me that this is the more reuse-friendly/transparent way to go (it would also make it easier to configure your build to use log or rlog (by passing a property value rather than use ant-contrib if/then/else constructs). But if you'd rather refactor the common behavior/interface into an abstract superclass, I guess one could make an argument to that extent. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24364] - Javadoc task link attribute should be relative to basedir
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24364. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24364 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24507] - javadoc quiet arg not supported
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24507. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24507 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 16:51 --- I think additionalparams is suffocient here. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25339] - javadoc task excludes packages with only package.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25339. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25339 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 16:54 --- Reasonable, but not the way your patch works (it should explicitly look for package.html, IMHO). Before I modify the task, I'll check what command line javadoc would do for package.html only packages. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22244] - Javadoc Task.. Don't use the JAVADOC exceutable from running VM
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22244. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22244 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 16:55 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30606 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SVN and optional tasks
As Stefan's recent Bugzilla activity shows, we have a lot of outstanding bugreps on SCM tasks. This, coupled with the recent ant libraries vote, leads me to think that our svn structure should from inception include libraries for the SCM optional task families, and that commit access should be given, per the original proposal, at the library level. This raises the question of library package structure, incidentally, but that aside, we might be able to actually get someone to support some of these tasks if we could grant commit access per SCM system. What do others think? -Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27419] - [PATCH] Add support for rlog and tag ranges to CvsChangeLog
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27419. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27419 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 16:58 --- Rob, I think you've misunderstood my question. Inside the code, you add rlog as command argument instead of a command and I don't immediately understand why. Quite possible that you don't know it either, given the reports is more than a year old. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27419] - [PATCH] Add support for rlog and tag ranges to CvsChangeLog
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27419. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27419 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 17:09 --- Hmmm ... gotcha. I'm foggy on this but it does ring a bell. I *THINK* it was because of some apparent strange behavior in CVS where it wasn't parsing the rlog commandline parameters properly and it seemed to be taking the whole line starting with 'rlog' as one paremeter value. That's the best I've got right now. Might not be necessary depending on the version of CVS. I can say that a handful of people here have been using this patch for the past year and it's been working fine for us. I added a code comment so it must have been for a good reason. Sorry I can't say with certainty what the reason was/is. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26227] - zip task should allow overwrite when updating an existing zip file
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26227. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 17:10 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22930 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22930] - New update mode in zip (and related) task
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22930. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22930 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||apache- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 17:10 --- *** Bug 26227 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29724] - Create zip with password protection
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29724. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29724 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 17:14 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24167 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24167] - Enable password protection for zip creation.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24167. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24167 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 17:14 --- *** Bug 29724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7245] - JUnit JUnitReport tasks / VM constraints
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7245. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7245 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |1.6.2 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 17:16 --- I think forkmode=once will solve all issues. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19774] - XMLJUnitResultFormatter should save time when a test was run
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19774. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19774 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED Target Milestone|--- |1.7 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 17:19 --- Ant 1.7 stores a timestamp and the hostname with the XML report. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22758] - [junit] add sun.reflect to the default trace filters
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22758. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22758 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Target Milestone|--- |1.6.3 Version|1.7Alpha (nightly) |1.6.2 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9995] - MKS Source Integrity tasks
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9995. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24513] - vssget displays too much
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24513. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24513 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31452] - StarTeam checlout enhancement
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31452. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31452 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22883] - Enhancement to pvcs Operational Task
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22883. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22883 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7712] - Provide patternset support for VSSGET task?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7712. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7712 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24806] - Add merge as valid option for vssget writablefiles attribute
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24806. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24806 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Optional Tasks |Optional SCM tasks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6599] - Fork in javadoc is not needed if you added a security manager
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6599. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6599 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 16:47 --- *** Bug 15550 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30606] - [PATCH] Ability to specify actual executable for javadoc
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30606. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30606 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 16:55 --- *** Bug 22244 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27419] - [PATCH] Add support for rlog and tag ranges to CvsChangeLog
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27419. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27419 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 16:36 --- *** Bug 27577 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12817] - capture of stdout/stderr in JUnit task causes out of memory exception
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12817. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12817 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 17:26 --- *** Bug 30879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Java.java PumpStreamHandler.java Redirector.java StreamPumper.java
jglick 2005/03/16 08:52:27
Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW
docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH java.html
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
Java.java PumpStreamHandler.java Redirector.java
StreamPumper.java
Log:
Merging java fork=true console input fix to Ant 1.6.3.
PR: 24918
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.503.2.200 +4 -0 ant/WHATSNEW
Index: WHATSNEW
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNEW,v
retrieving revision 1.503.2.199
retrieving revision 1.503.2.200
diff -u -r1.503.2.199 -r1.503.2.200
--- WHATSNEW 15 Mar 2005 20:57:30 - 1.503.2.199
+++ WHATSNEW 16 Mar 2005 16:52:25 - 1.503.2.200
@@ -129,6 +129,10 @@
Fixed bugs:
---
+* Programs run with java fork=true can now accept standard input
+ from the Ant console. (Programs run with java fork=false could
+ already do so.) Bugzilla 24918.
+
* AbstractCvsTask prematurely closed its outputStream and errorStream.
Bugzilla 30097.
No revision
No revision
1.24.2.12 +7 -7 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/java.html
Index: java.html
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/java.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24.2.11
retrieving revision 1.24.2.12
diff -u -r1.24.2.11 -r1.24.2.12
--- java.html 10 Mar 2005 13:07:43 - 1.24.2.11
+++ java.html 16 Mar 2005 16:52:26 - 1.24.2.12
@@ -16,10 +16,9 @@
If odd things go wrong when you run this task, set fork=true to use a new
JVM.
-pNote that you cannot interact with a forked VM, the only way to
-send input to it is via the input and inputstring attributes. Also note that
-in Ant 1.6, any attempt to read input in the forked VM will receive an
-EOF (-1). This is a change from Ant 1.5, where such an attempt would
block./p
+pAs of Ant 1.6.3, you can interact with a forked VM, as well as
+sending input to it via the codeinput/code and codeinputstring/code
+attributes./p
h3Parameters/h3
table border=1 cellpadding=2 cellspacing=0
@@ -156,14 +155,16 @@
td valign=topA file from which the executed command's standard input
is taken. This attribute is mutually exclusive with the
inputstring attribute/td
-td align=center valign=topNo/td
+td align=center valign=topNo; default is to take standard input
from console
+(unless codespawn=true/code)/td
/tr
tr
td valign=topinputstring/td
td valign=topA string which serves as the input stream for the
executed command. This attribute is mutually exclusive
with the
input attribute./td
-td align=center valign=topNo/td
+td align=center valign=topNo; default is to take standard input
from console
+(unless codespawn=true/code)/td
/tr
tr
td valign=topnewenvironment/td
@@ -314,4 +315,3 @@
/body
/html
-
No revision
No revision
1.77.2.12 +8 -6 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Java.java
Index: Java.java
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Java.java,v
retrieving revision 1.77.2.11
retrieving revision 1.77.2.12
diff -u -r1.77.2.11 -r1.77.2.12
--- Java.java 23 Jun 2004 19:17:12 - 1.77.2.11
+++ Java.java 16 Mar 2005 16:52:27 - 1.77.2.12
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
- * Copyright 2000-2004 The Apache Software Foundation
+ * Copyright 2000-2005 The Apache Software Foundation
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the License);
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
import org.apache.tools.ant.types.Assertions;
import org.apache.tools.ant.types.Permissions;
import org.apache.tools.ant.types.RedirectorElement;
+import org.apache.tools.ant.util.KeepAliveInputStream;
/**
* Launcher for Java applications. Allows use of
@@ -624,11 +625,8 @@
*/
public int handleInput(byte[] buffer, int offset, int length)
throws IOException {
-if (redirector.getInputStream() != null) {
-return redirector.handleInput(buffer, offset, length);
-} else {
-return super.handleInput(buffer, offset, length);
-}
+// Should work whether or not redirector.inputStream == null:
+return redirector.handleInput(buffer, offset, length);
}
/**
@@ -687,6 +685,10 @@
if (redirectorElement != null) {
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24918] - [PATCH] Permit console input to be sent to java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24918. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24918 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|1.7 |1.6.3 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 17:52 --- So, merging to the Ant 1.6.3 line: Checking in WHATSNEW; /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNEW,v -- WHATSNEW new revision: 1.503.2.200; previous revision: 1.503.2.199 done More commits to come... Checking in docs/manual/CoreTasks/java.html; /home/cvs/ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/java.html,v -- java.html new revision: 1.24.2.12; previous revision: 1.24.2.11 done More commits to come... Checking in src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Java.java; /home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Java.java,v -- Java.java new revision: 1.77.2.12; previous revision: 1.77.2.11 done Checking in src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/PumpStreamHandler.java; /home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/PumpStreamHandler.java,v -- PumpStreamHandler.java new revision: 1.14.2.6; previous revision: 1.14.2.5 done Checking in src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Redirector.java; /home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Redirector.java,v -- Redirector.java new revision: 1.11.2.12; previous revision: 1.11.2.11 done Checking in src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/StreamPumper.java; /home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/StreamPumper.java,v -- StreamPumper.java new revision: 1.16.2.5; previous revision: 1.16.2.4 done -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SVN and optional tasks
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As Stefan's recent Bugzilla activity shows, we have a lot of outstanding bugreps on SCM tasks. I hope that's not all that it shows (I mean, I'm also fixing a few bugs, not just moving them 8-) This raises the question of library package structure, incidentally, but that aside, we might be able to actually get someone to support some of these tasks if we could grant commit access per SCM system. What do others think? Yes, issues like this are the reason I proposed commit access at the library level in the first place. SVN supports authorization at the directory level OOTB and our infrastructure may some day support SVN accounts without real accounts on the server - so creating new accounts would become easier. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs PumpStreamHandler.java Redirector.java StreamPumper.java
jglick 2005/03/16 08:56:03
Modified:.WHATSNEW
docs/manual/CoreTasks java.html
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs
PumpStreamHandler.java Redirector.java
StreamPumper.java
Log:
Backdating since notices for #24918 (console input for java fork=true):
1.7 - 1.6.3.
Revision ChangesPath
1.781 +4 -4 ant/WHATSNEW
Index: WHATSNEW
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNEW,v
retrieving revision 1.780
retrieving revision 1.781
diff -u -r1.780 -r1.781
--- WHATSNEW 15 Mar 2005 13:35:28 - 1.780
+++ WHATSNEW 16 Mar 2005 16:56:03 - 1.781
@@ -36,10 +36,6 @@
Fixed bugs:
---
-* Programs run with java fork=true can now accept standard input
- from the Ant console. (Programs run with java fork=false could
- already do so.) Bugzilla Report 24918.
-
* Translate task does not remove tokens when a key is not found.
It logs a verbose message. Bugzilla Report 13936.
@@ -283,6 +279,10 @@
Fixed bugs:
---
+* Programs run with java fork=true can now accept standard input
+ from the Ant console. (Programs run with java fork=false could
+ already do so.) Bugzilla 24918.
+
* AbstractCvsTask prematurely closed its outputStream and errorStream.
Bugzilla 30097.
1.40 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/java.html
Index: java.html
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/java.html,v
retrieving revision 1.39
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -r1.39 -r1.40
--- java.html 14 Mar 2005 20:09:54 - 1.39
+++ java.html 16 Mar 2005 16:56:03 - 1.40
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
If odd things go wrong when you run this task, set fork=true to use a new
JVM.
-pAs of Ant 1.7, you can interact with a forked VM, as well as
+pAs of Ant 1.6.3, you can interact with a forked VM, as well as
sending input to it via the codeinput/code and codeinputstring/code
attributes./p
1.23 +1 -1
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/PumpStreamHandler.java
Index: PumpStreamHandler.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/PumpStreamHandler.java,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -r1.22 -r1.23
--- PumpStreamHandler.java28 Jan 2005 11:22:12 - 1.22
+++ PumpStreamHandler.java16 Mar 2005 16:56:03 - 1.23
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@
/**
* Creates a stream pumper to copy the given input stream to the
* given output stream. Used for standard input.
- * @since Ant 1.7
+ * @since Ant 1.6.3
*/
/*protected*/ StreamPumper createInputPump(InputStream is, OutputStream
os,
boolean closeWhenExhausted) {
1.27 +1 -1
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Redirector.java
Index: Redirector.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Redirector.java,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -r1.26 -r1.27
--- Redirector.java 10 Feb 2005 22:32:20 - 1.26
+++ Redirector.java 16 Mar 2005 16:56:03 - 1.27
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
* Set a stream to use as input.
*
* @param inputStream the stream from which input will be read
- * @since Ant 1.7
+ * @since Ant 1.6.3
*/
/*public*/ void setInputStream(InputStream inputStream) {
this.inputStream = inputStream;
1.23 +2 -2
ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/StreamPumper.java
Index: StreamPumper.java
===
RCS file:
/home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/StreamPumper.java,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -r1.22 -r1.23
--- StreamPumper.java 28 Jan 2005 10:15:34 - 1.22
+++ StreamPumper.java 16 Mar 2005 16:56:03 - 1.23
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
/**
* Set whether data should be flushed through to the output stream.
* @param autoflush if true, push through data; if false, let it be
buffered
- * @since Ant 1.7
+ * @since Ant 1.6.3
*/
/*public*/ void setAutoflush(boolean autoflush) {
this.autoflush = autoflush;
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
* Note that it may continue to block on the input stream
* but it will really stop the thread as soon as it gets EOF
* or any byte, and it will be marked as finished.
- * @since Ant 1.7
+ * @since Ant 1.6.3
*/
/*public*/
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24918] - [PATCH] Permit console input to be sent to java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24918. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24918 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 17:56 --- Also backdating since text in the trunk: Checking in WHATSNEW; /home/cvs/ant/WHATSNEW,v -- WHATSNEW new revision: 1.781; previous revision: 1.780 done More commits to come... Checking in docs/manual/CoreTasks/java.html; /home/cvs/ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/java.html,v -- java.html new revision: 1.40; previous revision: 1.39 done More commits to come... Checking in src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/PumpStreamHandler.java; /home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/PumpStreamHandler.java,v -- PumpStreamHandler.java new revision: 1.23; previous revision: 1.22 done Checking in src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Redirector.java; /home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Redirector.java,v -- Redirector.java new revision: 1.27; previous revision: 1.26 done Checking in src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/StreamPumper.java; /home/cvs/ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/StreamPumper.java,v -- StreamPumper.java new revision: 1.23; previous revision: 1.22 done -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [patch] ant in anger
why to quot;? '' is perfectly valid in HTML, and no need to escape it. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-devm=110693846331376w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-devm=106431742007031w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-devm=106431872408214w=2 We've had this debate in the past. I am fine with either choice, but we should be consistent across the board. -- Larry -Original Message- From: Kev Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:26 PM To: Ant Developers List Subject: [patch] ant in anger - fixed broken links - fixed spelling - A - a - - quot; c Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SVN and optional tasks
--- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As Stefan's recent Bugzilla activity shows, we have a lot of outstanding bugreps on SCM tasks. I hope that's not all that it shows (I mean, I'm also fixing a few bugs, not just moving them 8-) Yes, yes... ;) -Matt __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [patch] ant in anger
Shatzer, Larry wrote: why to quot;? '' is perfectly valid in HTML, and no need to escape it. +1 quot; makes the html very difficult to read - especially the examples. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-devm=110693846331376w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-devm=106431742007031w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-devm=106431872408214w=2 We've had this debate in the past. I am fine with either choice, but we should be consistent across the board. -- Larry -Original Message- From: Kev Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:26 PM To: Ant Developers List Subject: [patch] ant in anger - fixed broken links - fixed spelling - A - a - - quot; c Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: coreLoader
--- Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was looking into CoreLoader before. According to feedback it was a failed experiment. see: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-devm=107451990930463w=2 Thanks for the info. Perhaps the subproject context is a missing key to the concept? Any old-timers have an opinion on the above statement? -Matt __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[patch] Improvements to the RPM Optional Task
I've attached a patch that fixes two problems in the RPM Task:
- Provide a way to halt the build if the RPM build command exists with
an error status. Currently users must save the output to a file, and
grep the output for error messages if they want to automatically halt
the build when the RPM build command fails.
To fix this, I've added a haltonerror option which defaults to false to
preserve the current behavior. This simply checks the exist status of
the Execute process.
- Provide a way to quiet the RPM build process. Currently when building,
all messages to stdout and stderr are logged to MSG_INFO and MSG_WARN
respectively. It's not uncommon for there to be a thousand lines of
output. Unfortunately the RPM build tool prints a lot of relatively
useless information to stderr.
To fix this, I've added a showoutput option which defaults to true to
preserve the current behavior. When set to false, I log the all of the
output to MSG_DEBUG. A message [rpm] Building the RPM based on the
foo.spec file is still logged to MSG_INFO.
Thanks,
Zach Garner
--- apache-ant-1.6.2/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/Rpm.java.orig 2005-03-14 20:35:21.0 -0600
+++ apache-ant-1.6.2/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/Rpm.java 2005-03-16 10:55:53.476864272 -0600
@@ -89,6 +89,17 @@
private File error;
/**
+ * Halt on error return value from rpm build.
+ */
+private boolean haltonerror = false;
+
+/**
+ * Show output of RPM build command on console. This does not affect
+ * the printing of output and error messages to files.
+ */
+private boolean showoutput = true;
+
+/**
* Execute the task
*
* @throws BuildException is there is a problem in the task execution.
@@ -123,8 +134,13 @@
OutputStream outputstream = null;
OutputStream errorstream = null;
if (error == null output == null) {
-streamhandler = new LogStreamHandler(this, Project.MSG_INFO,
+if (showoutput) {
+streamhandler = new LogStreamHandler(this, Project.MSG_INFO,
Project.MSG_WARN);
+} else {
+streamhandler = new LogStreamHandler(this, Project.MSG_DEBUG,
+ Project.MSG_DEBUG);
+}
} else {
if (output != null) {
try {
@@ -134,8 +150,10 @@
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new BuildException(e, getLocation());
}
-} else {
+} else if (showoutput) {
outputstream = new LogOutputStream(this, Project.MSG_INFO);
+} else {
+outputstream = new LogOutputStream(this, Project.MSG_DEBUG);
}
if (error != null) {
try {
@@ -145,8 +163,10 @@
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new BuildException(e, getLocation());
}
-} else {
+} else if (showoutput) {
errorstream = new LogOutputStream(this, Project.MSG_WARN);
+} else {
+errorstream = new LogOutputStream(this, Project.MSG_DEBUG);
}
streamhandler = new PumpStreamHandler(outputstream, errorstream);
}
@@ -161,8 +181,16 @@
exe.setCommandline(toExecute.getCommandline());
try {
-exe.execute();
+int exitValue = exe.execute();
log(Building the RPM based on the + specFile + file);
+
+if (Execute.isFailure(exitValue)) {
+if (haltonerror) {
+throw new BuildException(RPM Build failed, getLocation());
+} else {
+log(RPM Build FAILED, Project.MSG_ERR);
+}
+}
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new BuildException(e, getLocation());
} finally {
@@ -263,6 +291,29 @@
}
/**
+ * If true, stop the build process when the rpmbuild command exits with
+ * an error status.
+ * @param value tttrue/tt if it should halt, otherwise
+ * ttfalse/tt
+ *
+ * @since Ant 1.6
+ */
+public void setHaltonerror(boolean value) {
+haltonerror = value;
+}
+
+/**
+ * If false, no output from the RPM build command will be logged.
+ * @param value tttrue/tt if output should be logged, otherwise
+ * ttfalse/tt
+ *
+ * @since Ant 1.6
+ */
+public void setShowoutput(boolean value) {
+showoutput = value;
+}
+
+/**
* Checks whether coderpmbuild/code is on the PATH and returns
* the absolute path to it - falls back to coderpm/code
* otherwise.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29407] - Handle null JUnit test name more gracefully
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29407. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29407 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Target Milestone|--- |1.6.3 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [patch] ant in anger
-Original Message- From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 9:21 AM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: [patch] ant in anger Shatzer, Larry wrote: why to quot;? '' is perfectly valid in HTML, and no need to escape it. +1 quot; makes the html very difficult to read - especially the examples. I have a patch to change all quot; to in the html. It is quite large, around 500k,... Should I submit sections of this? -- Larry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [patch] ant in anger
Shatzer, Larry wrote: I have a patch to change all quot; to in the html. It is quite large, around 500k,... Should I submit sections of this? Yikes, No, I do not think so. In ant 1.7 (or 1.8) we will be moving to an xml based (maybe (x)docdet assisted) documentation. At that stage there will be a need to convert the html to xml, the quote translation can be done then. Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34031] - XMLProperty usage of FileUtils.getFileUtils()
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34031. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34031 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID Summary|XMLProperty usage of|XMLProperty usage of |FileUtils.getFileUtils()|FileUtils.getFileUtils() --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-16 18:33 --- Could it be that you are mixing sources from different ant versions? The XmlProperty in ant 1.7 version uses private static final FileUtils FILE_UTILS = FileUtils.getFileUtils(); the XmlProperty in the latest 1.6 version uses private FileUtils fileUtils = FileUtils.newFileUtils(); The FileUtiles.getFileUtils() method is available in ant 1.6.3, due soon, and already in the 1.6 branch since 2005-01-26 (and even longer in the 1.7, main, branch). (so even when the current 1.6 version would use getFileUtils() it should work, and most certainly compile) So it seems you are trying to compile XmlProperty.java from the head against the sources of ant 1.6.2. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] some entity escaping
Escaping to amp; and to gt; -- Larry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34045] New: - Declaration of task visibility
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34045. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34045 Summary: Declaration of task visibility Product: Ant Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: Other AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have been using ANT since day one and have written MANY tools which make use of ANT and integrate with ant including a flash build server, swing clients, over 15 new tasks and 10's of thousands of lines of ant script. My only complaint to this day is that there is still no real intuitive way to declare a task 'internal/external'. As I personally believe EVERY task should have a description, I dont agree with the ant documentation in that: 'Targets without such a description are deemed internal and will not be listed, unless either the -verbose or -debug option is used.' [http://ant.apache.org/manual/using.html#targets] I'm currently working at the largest telecommunications company in Australia where in my spare time I manage the build process for over 7 very large projects. One project alone has 23 files (not including around 10 common files for things like cvs/vss/svn tasks) totalling over 7000 lines. One of those files alone has 43 targets. It is a very complex build and deployment environment. Since I have managed many build environments before I introduced something into this build environment which has made it much easier to determine which targets are allowed to be called externally and which are main entry points. I have been using the standard OO scope methodology such that targets which can be called from any ant script I have added the scope=public attribute to the target element. Targets which can be called from scripts in the same directory have the scope=protected attribute. Targets which can only be called by other targets within the same script are marked with the scope=private attribute. I had to make a couple of mods to the ant source so that parsing of the build scripts is achieved without error, etc. This has worked great, especially with build scripts which are used in IDE's. In the flash build server and swing ant clients I've written, only public targets are visible/executable which cuts down on a lot of confusion. I currently have 120 build scripts loaded into my IDE. Gets a bit confusing if all the scripts show all their targets, especially when 90 percent of the targets are internal targets. Please let me know what you feel about this approach. Sorry about all the history but I wanted to make the point that I didn't write my first script yesterday. Thanks, - Jay [internal public private scope visibility description] -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
