Re: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.0.0-beta1 (second attempt)
Xavier Hanin wrote: I have built a new release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta1 You can download it from this URL: http://people.apache.org/~xavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-beta1/ http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-beta1/ and the m2 repository is here: http://people.apache.org/~xavier/m2-staging-repo/http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/m2-staging-repo/ Compared to the previous release attempt I've only the following changes (which can be tracked in svn in the 2.0.0-beta1 branch): - merged a fix on cache locking (disabled by default) - merged some changes in makepom task to address Gilles remark - fix a bug on a unit test of makepom not done on trunk (still need to be merged to trunk) - reflect change to makepomin build-release.xml - package readme with all ditribs (including crypto notice) - put maven 2 distrib in a m2 staging repo for ease of testing I haven't done much testing of these artifacts, I had some slight troubles getting in my way (but when it takes 10 min to make a full release build a slight error can make you loose a lot of time), and it's getting really late over here, but I don't expect to have any more time for a new release attempt until next week, so if ever this one doesn't pass, I hope someone will step up to replace me as release mgr for this release. So, do you vote for the release of these binaries? my vote: [+1 ] Yes [ ] No -- Steve Loughran http://www.1060.org/blogxter/publish/5 Author: Ant in Action http://antbook.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35866] - JUnit task should show which test case failed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35866. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35866 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-10 03:19 --- Sure, we can switch formatters, but the summary formatter does not seem very useful if it gives so little information. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35866] - JUnit task should show which test case failed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35866. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35866 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-10 05:32 --- -its generally expected to run side-by-side with the junit formatter, so you run the summary to see if tests passed/failed, then switch to the generated XML/HTML results on failure. If the tests passed, you dont care what happened (unless you are being naughty and expecting people to look at the system.out to decided if a test really worked) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Link bad?
Hi all, The link to http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ViewLists which is referenced in the last bullet list on http://ant.apache.org/mail.html does not work for me. -peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
