Re: Should I open a vote ? (Re: svn commit: r740252 - in /ant/ivy/updatesite/trunk/dist: ./ features/ plugins/)
Xavier Hanin wrote: On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Maarten Coene maarten_co...@yahoo.com wrote: Creating a 2.0.1 release is ok for me. I'm willing to create the release if no-one else volunteers... I've taken a quick look at the changes in JIRA, I think IVY-970 contains the biggest change, but I think we can include it in the new release (or is it too risky?) I agree, I've reviewed the changes too and I think they are all ok to be included in 2.0.1. IVY-970 is slightly bigger but only impact buildnumber, and after a quick code review I don't expect any major problem with it, so I'm fine to include it. And maybe we should also try to fix IVY-987 in the 2.0.1 release to improve our maven2 compatibility? Indeed, this bug is giving bad feeling about Ivy maven 2 compatibility. I should be able to find some time this week to investigate and hopefully find a fix. So if we all agree we could try to plan making a release in a week or so, if this match your planned availability Maarten. +1 for a release, there are things that have been fixed like handling the latest Xalan sha1; though that also implies a full beta test cycle just to make sure everything seems stable - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Anybody planning to attend ApacheCon in Amsterdam late March?
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2009-02-05, Jimmy Zhao junmingz...@gmail.com wrote: Personally, I think my talk is more like a workshop or tutorial, it might not so technical, but it would be interesting if people who want to know a new way to do testing -- via AntUnit. It may as well interesting to us who work on AntUnit to see hwo it is used outside of our little world of testing Ant tasks - and where you have found areas where AntUnit needs improverment for these other ideas. If possible, we would like to meet you there and hear your questions and ideas about how to make AntUnit better, and I will definitely like to contribute as best as I can. Looking forward to meething you and to your stronger involvement here. Stefan I will be there, one technical talk, one more, well, strategic. Not sorted out travel plans. If I make it to the hackathon I will probably be sitting on the hadoop table, though there are some needs there that I want to push back into ant, around junit work. when you are running jobs across a few hundred machines, your reporting needs change. -steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r743910 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javac.java
Stefan Bodewig wrote: this should be the equivalent of compiling a package-info.java containing only SOURCE annotations using JDK 5. Do you know whether a Java 1.4 VM will even try to load the class file under any circumstances (other than some explicit reflection invocations)? You cannot use package-info.java with JDK 1.4 to begin with. don't the descriptions in bugzilla provide enough information to write AntUnit tests? Probably. I was more talking about some as yet undescribed setups which we would not know to write tests for. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
