Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Any reason why you can't create a key for yourself? My key isn't counter-signed so anything I sign will be 'untrusted' :( so what? If I signed it, then a few signatures would be on my key but for the majority of users there wouldn't be a trust path from them to my key. It is better to have signatures on your key, that's sure (and that is something we can get arranged even without meeting F2F), but it is not a requirement for signing a release. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta
Hi, so what? If I signed it, then a few signatures would be on my key but for the majority of users there wouldn't be a trust path from them to my key. It is better to have signatures on your key, that's sure (and that is something we can get arranged even without meeting F2F), but it is not a requirement for signing a release. My mistake I was under the impression that only people with a counter-signed key could push releases - now I know that's not the case :) Thanks, Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta
Hi all, I think it's time to go ahead and push out 1.7.1 for wider testing. I really *don't* want to add any changes to code at the moment, but if there are any documentation issues that someone notices I'm willing to let them in on a case by case basis Over to the vote: Despite the strange bug Steve uncovered for networked drives on Windows, Ant 1.7.1 is ready for beta: Yes, I'll help (I need someone to sign with pgp) [ x ] (+1) Yes, go ahead but I won't help [ ] (+0) No, it's not ready [ ] (-1) Thanks, Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta
Kevin Jackson wrote: Hi all, I think it's time to go ahead and push out 1.7.1 for wider testing. I really *don't* want to add any changes to code at the moment, but if there are any documentation issues that someone notices I'm willing to let them in on a case by case basis Over to the vote: Despite the strange bug Steve uncovered for networked drives on Windows, Ant 1.7.1 is ready for beta: Yes, I'll help (I need someone to sign with pgp) [ x ] (+1) +1. I dont know how to do the PGP signing, but I can learn with you Yes, go ahead but I won't help [ ] (+0) No, it's not ready [ ] (-1) Thanks, Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Steve Loughran http://www.1060.org/blogxter/publish/5 Author: Ant in Action http://antbook.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it's time to go ahead and push out 1.7.1 for wider testing. good. Over to the vote: That's not how this works. You create the tasballs (and zips) and we vote on them. Despite the strange bug Steve uncovered for networked drives on Windows, Ant 1.7.1 is ready for beta: Yes, I'll help (I need someone to sign with pgp) [ x ] (+1) +1 I'll help. I've signed a few files but I'll happily stand on the sidelines and watch Steve and you figure it out ;-). Seriously Antoine's recipe in the ReleaseInstructions are great and you won't need more. Any reason why you can't create a key for yourself? Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta
+1 Martijn Kevin Jackson schreef: Hi all, I think it's time to go ahead and push out 1.7.1 for wider testing. I really *don't* want to add any changes to code at the moment, but if there are any documentation issues that someone notices I'm willing to let them in on a case by case basis Over to the vote: Despite the strange bug Steve uncovered for networked drives on Windows, Ant 1.7.1 is ready for beta: Yes, I'll help (I need someone to sign with pgp) [ x ] (+1) Yes, go ahead but I won't help [ ] (+0) No, it's not ready [ ] (-1) Thanks, Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it's time to go ahead and push out 1.7.1 for wider testing. good. Over to the vote: That's not how this works. You create the tasballs (and zips) and we vote on them. Yep, we need the tarballs. Peter Despite the strange bug Steve uncovered for networked drives on Windows, Ant 1.7.1 is ready for beta: Yes, I'll help (I need someone to sign with pgp) [ x ] (+1) +1 I'll help. I've signed a few files but I'll happily stand on the sidelines and watch Steve and you figure it out ;-). Seriously Antoine's recipe in the ReleaseInstructions are great and you won't need more. Any reason why you can't create a key for yourself? Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.7.1 beta
Hi, Any reason why you can't create a key for yourself? My key isn't counter-signed so anything I sign will be 'untrusted' :( Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
