Re: Compiling fails on JDK 1.3
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried a build on JDK 1.3/WinXP-SP2, but that failed. The constructor FileOutputStream(File, boolean) was added in JDK 1.4. Should be easy to fix, I'm just not sure whether it needs to be. http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#java-version only talks about Java 1.1 and 1.2. I think we decided to make 1.7 require Java 1.3 and trunk Java 1.4 or has 1.7 still been at 1.2 and we switched to Java 1.3 with trunk? Stefan Don't recall. Me, I'd go for Java 5+ on SVN_HEAD, because Java 5 has been out there so long that sun are going to remove support for some versions soon, and some of the language changes are pretty fundamental - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compiling fails on JDK 1.3
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found the vote that we dropped Java 1.2 http://marc.info/?l=ant-devm=117794737813795w=2 Great, thanks. Should we post these info in a more prominent place instead of a mailinglist-search? absolutely, and we probably should have listed it as a breaking change in Ant 1.7.1 Like FAQ? Will do, alongside a comment that we don't really test old Java releases and only ensure that Ant compiles there. I'll also start a different thread for the Java version required by trunk. Do you want to fix the JDK 1.3 issues in trunk (I don't have a 1.3 JDK around anymore and am too lazy to install one right now) or should we wait for the thread's outcome? Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: Compiling fails on JDK 1.3
Do you want to fix the JDK 1.3 issues in trunk (I don't have a 1.3 JDK around anymore and am too lazy to install one right now) or should we wait for the thread's outcome? I think it is too much work for getting JDK 1.3 compliance if we want to get rid off 1.3. And Trunk is the parent of 1.7.2/1.8. If the vote wouldnt pass, I could investigate some time. Jan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compiling fails on JDK 1.3
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should we post these info in a more prominent place instead of a mailinglist-search? absolutely, and we probably should have listed it as a breaking change in Ant 1.7.1 The issue was that ant 1.7.0 could not be used with jdk1.2. This was found after the release of 1.7.0, and was due to the fact that the java5 javac compiler is unable to generate correct bytecode for 1.2. - so the breaking change is in Ant 1.7.0. Understood, so I'll change the FAQ. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compiling fails on JDK 1.3
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried a build on JDK 1.3/WinXP-SP2, but that failed. The constructor FileOutputStream(File, boolean) was added in JDK 1.4. Should be easy to fix, I'm just not sure whether it needs to be. http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#java-version only talks about Java 1.1 and 1.2. I think we decided to make 1.7 require Java 1.3 and trunk Java 1.4 or has 1.7 still been at 1.2 and we switched to Java 1.3 with trunk? Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AW: Compiling fails on JDK 1.3
I found the vote that we dropped Java 1.2 http://marc.info/?l=ant-devm=117794737813795w=2 I only found a thread about discussing dropping 1.3 http://marc.info/?l=ant-devm=120039266628773w=2 but no vote... Should we post these info in a more prominent place instead of a mailinglist-search? Like FAQ? Jan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2008 06:27 An: dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: Compiling fails on JDK 1.3 On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried a build on JDK 1.3/WinXP-SP2, but that failed. The constructor FileOutputStream(File, boolean) was added in JDK 1.4. Should be easy to fix, I'm just not sure whether it needs to be. http://ant.apache.org/faq.html#java-version only talks about Java 1.1 and 1.2. I think we decided to make 1.7 require Java 1.3 and trunk Java 1.4 or has 1.7 still been at 1.2 and we switched to Java 1.3 with trunk? Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Compiling fails on JDK 1.3
I tried a build on JDK 1.3/WinXP-SP2, but that failed. The constructor FileOutputStream(File, boolean) was added in JDK 1.4. Jan Java-Home: c:\jdk\130 java version 1.3.0 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.0-C) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.0-C, mixed mode) ... Bootstrapping Ant Distribution JAVA_HOME=c:\jdk\130 JAVA=java.exe JAVAC=c:\jdk\130\bin\javac CLASSPATH=lib\xercesImpl.jar;lib\xml-apis.jar;lib\optional\ant-antunit-1 .1.jar;lib\optional\junit-3.8.2.jar;c:\jdk\130\lib\tools.jar;build\c lasses;src\main; ... Compiling Ant Classes src\main\org\apache\tools\ant\taskdefs\Echo.java:70: cannot resolve symbol symbol : constructor FileOutputStream (java.io.File,boolean) location: class java.io.FileOutputStream OutputStream os = output instanceof FileProvider ? os = new FileOutputStream( ^ src\main\org\apache\tools\ant\taskdefs\SQLExec.java:574: cannot resolve symbol symbol : constructor FileOutputStream (java.io.File,boolean) location: class java.io.FileOutputStream os = new FileOutputStream(((FileProvider) output).getFile(), append); ^ Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API. Note: Recompile with -deprecation for details. 2 errors ... Cleaning Up Build Directories ... Done Bootstrapping Ant Distribution - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
