DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19249] - javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent

2003-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249

javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-08-28 14:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=7981)
Patch to support changing exit-status definition of success

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19249] - javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent

2003-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249

javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-08-28 14:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=7982)
documentation update associated with successcode patch.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19249] - javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent

2003-08-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249

javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-08-28 14:52 ---
Whoops! Ignore those attachments; wrong bug. Sorry.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19249] - javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent

2003-04-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249

javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|Major   |Enhancement



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-04-25 06:50 ---
If you really already have all your packages listed in doclet.ins you are not
going to gain anything by using javadoc instead of exec - well, javadoc
doesn't need the javadoc executable in the PATH, but that's pretty much all.

You must give javadoc at leas one source file or package name to chew upon
as it really has been invented for a more dynamic system than yours.  This also
is a workaround for you, simply give it a single source file you will want to
have docced anyway.

You can pass your @doclet.ins via the additionalparam attribute.