Re: Antlib SVN and antunit Java versions
On 19/12/18 11:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2018-12-18, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> One option in similar cases that we have employed in other jobs is to >> configure the Java system property -Dhttps.protocols to "TLSv1.2". But >> this version of TLS is only supported in a Java release after Java 1.5. > I'd be in favor of updating the jobs. Nobody would build releases using > Java 1.5 either, I guess. Done. I have updated the jobs of antlib svn and antunit to use Java 8 to build it. > >> At a more higher level, I think it's probably time to decide whether we >> want to change the minimum required Java versions for these libraries? >> Should we now mandate Java 1.8 at least? > In the case of antlib svn we could simply decide to call it dead or > dormant or whatever (like almost all other antlibs, I guess). Unless I'm > overlooking something, the svn antlib is neither listed on > http://ant.apache.org/antlibs/proper.html nor > http://ant.apache.org/antlibs/sandbox.html - so it doesn't even exist > from out user's point of view. I found this (live) page http://ant.apache.org/antlibs/svn/ the other day while looking at the Jenkins failure. But now that you mention it, I don't remember how I landed up on that page. I don't see it linked in the Jenkins job or some other place. But yes, I don't see it linked anywhere in the Ant website. I'll start a new VOTE thread to retire this project. I might need Jan's help here if/after the VOTE passes to actually do some of the process involved in retiring projects. -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Antlib SVN and antunit Java versions
On 2018-12-18, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > One option in similar cases that we have employed in other jobs is to > configure the Java system property -Dhttps.protocols to "TLSv1.2". But > this version of TLS is only supported in a Java release after Java 1.5. I'd be in favor of updating the jobs. Nobody would build releases using Java 1.5 either, I guess. > At a more higher level, I think it's probably time to decide whether we > want to change the minimum required Java versions for these libraries? > Should we now mandate Java 1.8 at least? In the case of antlib svn we could simply decide to call it dead or dormant or whatever (like almost all other antlibs, I guess). Unless I'm overlooking something, the svn antlib is neither listed on http://ant.apache.org/antlibs/proper.html nor http://ant.apache.org/antlibs/sandbox.html - so it doesn't even exist from out user's point of view. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
Re: Antlib SVN and antunit Java versions
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 10:44, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:21 AM Jaikiran Pai wrote: > > > [...] 2 jobs[1][2] which are for Antlib SVN and Antunit libraries. > > Both these jobs are configure for JDK 5 [...] > > However, the Maven central repo [...[ has been configured not to let > > clients with > > lower TLS versions (lesser than TLSv1.2) to communicate with it. [...] > > But this version of TLS is only supported in a Java release after Java 1.5. > > [...] > > Should we now mandate Java 1.8 at least? > > > > Sounds completely reasonable to me. Thanks for the clear message. +1. --DD > I'd say the choices are: - use Java 6 or 7 with command line switch forcing TLSv1.2 or Java 8 and crosscompile to Java 5 - change to Java 8 to follow Ant 1.10 Java 9+ can only crosscompile to Java 6+. It will be interesting to see if JEP 332 [1] gets backported... Gintas [1] https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8202625
Re: Antlib SVN and antunit Java versions
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:21 AM Jaikiran Pai wrote: > [...] 2 jobs[1][2] which are for Antlib SVN and Antunit libraries. Both these jobs are configure for JDK 5 [...] > However, the Maven central repo [...[ has been configured not to let > clients with > lower TLS versions (lesser than TLSv1.2) to communicate with it. [...] But this version of TLS is only supported in a Java release after Java 1.5. > [...] Should we now mandate Java 1.8 at least? > Sounds completely reasonable to me. Thanks for the clear message. +1. --DD
