Re: Branches, please vote...
* Cliff Woolley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Opinions on my '?'s above? Looks good. -- justin Likewise +1 to all. +1 here too. -Thom -- That sounds like a lot of work... Can we out source? The Revolution will not be outsourced! (Slick/Monique - Sinfest)
Branches, please vote...
We have apr/apr/branches/ 1.0.x/ - this is great APR_0_9_BRANCH - this should be 0.9.x? APR/ unlabeled/ - these are duds - delete them? apr/apr-util/branches/ 1.0.x/ - again, dandy APU_0_9_BRANCH - this should be 0.9.x? apr/apr-iconv/branches/ 1.0.x/ - again, dandy API_0_9_BRANCH - this should be 0.9.x? API_1_0_BRANCH ICONV - these are dead - rm them? Opinions on my '?'s above?
Re: Branches, please vote...
--On Saturday, November 20, 2004 12:18 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have apr/apr/branches/ 1.0.x/ - this is great APR_0_9_BRANCH - this should be 0.9.x? +1. APR/ unlabeled/ - these are duds - delete them? +1. apr/apr-util/branches/ 1.0.x/ - again, dandy APU_0_9_BRANCH - this should be 0.9.x? +1. apr/apr-iconv/branches/ 1.0.x/ - again, dandy API_0_9_BRANCH - this should be 0.9.x? +1. API_1_0_BRANCH ICONV - these are dead - rm them? +1. Opinions on my '?'s above? Looks good. -- justin
Re: Branches, please vote...
+1 on all changes. William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: We have apr/apr/branches/ 1.0.x/ - this is great APR_0_9_BRANCH - this should be 0.9.x? APR/ unlabeled/ - these are duds - delete them? apr/apr-util/branches/ 1.0.x/ - again, dandy APU_0_9_BRANCH - this should be 0.9.x? apr/apr-iconv/branches/ 1.0.x/ - again, dandy API_0_9_BRANCH - this should be 0.9.x? API_1_0_BRANCH ICONV - these are dead - rm them? Opinions on my '?'s above?
Re: Branches, please vote...
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Opinions on my '?'s above? Looks good. -- justin Likewise +1 to all. --Cliff
