Re: Target 1.6.1?

[William A Rowe Jr]

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Nick Kew  wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 13:43 -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
>> On 05/30/2017 08:06 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>> > It's looking fine since Bill's surgical work last week.
>> >
>> > I'm minded to T apr-1.6.1 tomorrow, and put it up
>> > along with apr-util-1.6.0 for vote as Release Candidates.
>>
>> Any last thoughts on exporting more build artifacts [1] before 1.6 is baked?
>
> No, I hadn't considered those.  This is an exercise in trying
> to release an updated bundle of what we've got, not introducing
> new things.
>
>> [1]
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d29d239e62bd4f76391e1011624988b57ace1d93493a1a22f823e968@%3Cdev.apr.apache.org%3E
>
> Hmm, so you've been pushing that for a while.  Sorry I've
> missed it so far.  I'll try and take a look.
>
> There may be a case for another release relatively soon
> if I don't get my head around it for 1.6.1.


I agree with Nick's sentiment. 1.6.0 was feature complete, 1.6.1 is then
subtractive but otherwise leans on all the testing conducted previously.

We truly want to get 1.7.0 and timedlock mutex API's in users hands
a bit later this summer or early fall, so let's get this into trunk and 1.7.x
and see what breaks. I'm happy to commit the patch if you aren't yet
an APR committer.

Re: Target 1.6.1?

[Nick Kew]

On Tue, 2017-05-30 at 13:43 -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On 05/30/2017 08:06 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> > It's looking fine since Bill's surgical work last week.
> > 
> > I'm minded to T apr-1.6.1 tomorrow, and put it up
> > along with apr-util-1.6.0 for vote as Release Candidates.
> 
> Any last thoughts on exporting more build artifacts [1] before 1.6 is baked?

No, I hadn't considered those.  This is an exercise in trying
to release an updated bundle of what we've got, not introducing
new things.

> [1] 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d29d239e62bd4f76391e1011624988b57ace1d93493a1a22f823e968@%3Cdev.apr.apache.org%3E

Hmm, so you've been pushing that for a while.  Sorry I've
missed it so far.  I'll try and take a look.

There may be a case for another release relatively soon
if I don't get my head around it for 1.6.1.

-- 
Nick Kew

Re: Target 1.6.1?

[Steffen]

Building and running fine on windows with httpd 2.4.26-dev. 

> Op 30 mei 2017 om 17:06 heeft Nick Kew  het volgende 
> geschreven:
> 
> It's looking fine since Bill's surgical work last week.
> 
> I'm minded to T apr-1.6.1 tomorrow, and put it up
> along with apr-util-1.6.0 for vote as Release Candidates.
> 
> Any objections?
> 
> -- 
> Nick Kew

Re: Target 1.6.1?

[Jim Jagielski]

Looking fine for macOS

> On May 30, 2017, at 11:06 AM, Nick Kew  wrote:
> 
> It's looking fine since Bill's surgical work last week.
> 
> I'm minded to T apr-1.6.1 tomorrow, and put it up
> along with apr-util-1.6.0 for vote as Release Candidates.
> 
> Any objections?
> 
> -- 
> Nick Kew

Re: Target 1.6.1?

[Jacob Champion]

On 05/30/2017 08:06 AM, Nick Kew wrote:

It's looking fine since Bill's surgical work last week.

I'm minded to T apr-1.6.1 tomorrow, and put it up
along with apr-util-1.6.0 for vote as Release Candidates.


Any last thoughts on exporting more build artifacts [1] before 1.6 is baked?

--Jacob

[1] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d29d239e62bd4f76391e1011624988b57ace1d93493a1a22f823e968@%3Cdev.apr.apache.org%3E

Re: Target 1.6.1?

[Dennis Clarke]

On 05/30/2017 11:06 AM, Nick Kew wrote:

It's looking fine since Bill's surgical work last week.

I'm minded to T apr-1.6.1 tomorrow, and put it up
along with apr-util-1.6.0 for vote as Release Candidates.

Any objections?


Certainly none from me however I have yet to get my Apache 2.4.x
builds running with the new 1.6.1 code. I should try that today.

Dennis