Re: svn commit: r106038 - in apr/apr/branches: 0.9.x APR_0_9_BRANCH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Sat Nov 20 14:46:04 2004 New Revision: 106038 Added: apr/apr/branches/0.9.x/ - copied from r106037, apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/ Removed: apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/ Log: Reorganize the apr project 0.9 branches Quick question (I *know* I should have hit at least one SVN preso/BOF @ Ac2004, but there it is): if I already checked-out the APR_0_9_BRANCH, how do I change it, locally, to the 0.9.x one? I don't have to re-checkout, do I? Also, more a generic question, why didn't we svn move instead of cvn copy ?
Re: svn commit: r106038 - in apr/apr/branches: 0.9.x APR_0_9_BRANCH
Jim Jagielski wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Sat Nov 20 14:46:04 2004 New Revision: 106038 Added: apr/apr/branches/0.9.x/ - copied from r106037, apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/ Removed: apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/ Log: Reorganize the apr project 0.9 branches Quick question (I *know* I should have hit at least one SVN preso/BOF @ Ac2004, but there it is): if I already checked-out the APR_0_9_BRANCH, how do I change it, locally, to the 0.9.x one? I don't have to re-checkout, do I? Nope: svn switch --help (from inside your working copy) svn switch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/0.9.x Also, more a generic question, why didn't we svn move instead of cvn copy ? a svn 'move' currently is implemented as a copy and then rm of the old location.
Re: svn commit: r106038 - in apr/apr/branches: 0.9.x APR_0_9_BRANCH
* Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Sat Nov 20 14:46:04 2004 New Revision: 106038 Added: apr/apr/branches/0.9.x/ - copied from r106037, apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/ Removed: apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/ Log: Reorganize the apr project 0.9 branches Quick question (I *know* I should have hit at least one SVN preso/BOF @ Ac2004, but there it is): if I already checked-out the APR_0_9_BRANCH, how do I change it, locally, to the 0.9.x one? I don't have to re-checkout, do I? See OtherBill's posting on [EMAIL PROTECTED] You just need to svn switch. Also, more a generic question, why didn't we svn move instead of cvn copy ? move := copy delete (but atomic) nd -- Winnetous Erbe: http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2
Re: svn commit: r106038 - in apr/apr/branches: 0.9.x APR_0_9_BRANCH
At 07:10 PM 11/20/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: wrowe Date: Sat Nov 20 14:46:04 2004 New Revision: 106038 Added: apr/apr/branches/0.9.x/ - copied from r106037, apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/ Removed: apr/apr/branches/APR_0_9_BRANCH/ Log: Reorganize the apr project 0.9 branches Quick question (I *know* I should have hit at least one SVN preso/BOF @ Ac2004, but there it is): if I already checked-out the APR_0_9_BRANCH, how do I change it, locally, to the 0.9.x one? I don't have to re-checkout, do I? Nope - that's one happy detail svn considered; see the post Subject: [SVN] Branches for apr[-util|-iconv] 0.9.x moved for details of how to switch. Also, more a generic question, why didn't we svn move instead of cvn copy ? We did, that's how the commit message appears (copy foo from bar, removed bar.) Bill
