[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Arrow ADBC (API) 1.1.0
The vote passes with 5 binding votes. Thanks all! As stated before, I'll hold off on merging until after ADBC (packages) 0.6.0 is released, which I will do as soon as Arrow (Go) 13.0.0 is released. On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, at 12:16, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > Le 14/08/2023 à 19:39, David Li a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly >> decided to treat as a specification [2]. These revisions clean up various >> missing features (e.g. cancellation, error metadata) and better position >> ADBC to help different data systems interoperate (e.g. by exposing more >> metadata, like table/column statistics). >> >> For details, see the PR at [3]. (The main file to read through is adbc.h.) >> >> I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along with >> the linked PR, as version 1.1.0 of the ADBC API standard. >> >> Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. This is not a >> vote to release any packages; the first package release to support version >> 1.1.0 of the APIs will be 0.7.0 of the packages. (So I will not merge the >> linked PR until after we release ADBC 0.6.0.) >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC 1.1.0 specification >> [ ] 0 >> [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... >> >> Thanks to Sutou Kouhei, Matt Topol, Dewey Dunnington, Antoine Pitrou, Will >> Ayd, and Will Jones for feedback on the design and various work-in-progress >> PRs. >> >> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/milestone/3 >> [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/s8m4l9hccfh5kqvvd2x3gxn3ry0w1ryo >> [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/971 >> >> Thank you, >> David
Re: [VOTE] Apache Arrow ADBC (API) 1.1.0
+1 (binding) Le 14/08/2023 à 19:39, David Li a écrit : Hello, We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly decided to treat as a specification [2]. These revisions clean up various missing features (e.g. cancellation, error metadata) and better position ADBC to help different data systems interoperate (e.g. by exposing more metadata, like table/column statistics). For details, see the PR at [3]. (The main file to read through is adbc.h.) I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along with the linked PR, as version 1.1.0 of the ADBC API standard. Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. This is not a vote to release any packages; the first package release to support version 1.1.0 of the APIs will be 0.7.0 of the packages. (So I will not merge the linked PR until after we release ADBC 0.6.0.) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC 1.1.0 specification [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... Thanks to Sutou Kouhei, Matt Topol, Dewey Dunnington, Antoine Pitrou, Will Ayd, and Will Jones for feedback on the design and various work-in-progress PRs. [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/milestone/3 [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/s8m4l9hccfh5kqvvd2x3gxn3ry0w1ryo [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/971 Thank you, David
Re: [VOTE] Apache Arrow ADBC (API) 1.1.0
+1! Thank you for your work on this! On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 11:00 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > +1 > > In <2a98c33e-60c1-4df9-80db-350939eb8...@app.fastmail.com> > "[VOTE] Apache Arrow ADBC (API) 1.1.0" on Mon, 14 Aug 2023 13:39:46 -0400, > "David Li" wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly > > decided to treat as a specification [2]. These revisions clean up various > > missing features (e.g. cancellation, error metadata) and better position > > ADBC to help different data systems interoperate (e.g. by exposing more > > metadata, like table/column statistics). > > > > For details, see the PR at [3]. (The main file to read through is adbc.h.) > > > > I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along with > > the linked PR, as version 1.1.0 of the ADBC API standard. > > > > Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. This is not a > > vote to release any packages; the first package release to support version > > 1.1.0 of the APIs will be 0.7.0 of the packages. (So I will not merge the > > linked PR until after we release ADBC 0.6.0.) > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC 1.1.0 specification > > [ ] 0 > > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... > > > > Thanks to Sutou Kouhei, Matt Topol, Dewey Dunnington, Antoine Pitrou, Will > > Ayd, and Will Jones for feedback on the design and various work-in-progress > > PRs. > > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/milestone/3 > > [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/s8m4l9hccfh5kqvvd2x3gxn3ry0w1ryo > > [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/971 > > > > Thank you, > > David
Re: [VOTE] Apache Arrow ADBC (API) 1.1.0
+1 In <2a98c33e-60c1-4df9-80db-350939eb8...@app.fastmail.com> "[VOTE] Apache Arrow ADBC (API) 1.1.0" on Mon, 14 Aug 2023 13:39:46 -0400, "David Li" wrote: > Hello, > > We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly > decided to treat as a specification [2]. These revisions clean up various > missing features (e.g. cancellation, error metadata) and better position ADBC > to help different data systems interoperate (e.g. by exposing more metadata, > like table/column statistics). > > For details, see the PR at [3]. (The main file to read through is adbc.h.) > > I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along with the > linked PR, as version 1.1.0 of the ADBC API standard. > > Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. This is not a vote > to release any packages; the first package release to support version 1.1.0 > of the APIs will be 0.7.0 of the packages. (So I will not merge the linked PR > until after we release ADBC 0.6.0.) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC 1.1.0 specification > [ ] 0 > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... > > Thanks to Sutou Kouhei, Matt Topol, Dewey Dunnington, Antoine Pitrou, Will > Ayd, and Will Jones for feedback on the design and various work-in-progress > PRs. > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/milestone/3 > [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/s8m4l9hccfh5kqvvd2x3gxn3ry0w1ryo > [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/971 > > Thank you, > David
Re: [VOTE] Apache Arrow ADBC (API) 1.1.0
+1 On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:58 PM Will Jones wrote: > +1 > > These additions look excellent. > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 10:40 AM David Li wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly > > decided to treat as a specification [2]. These revisions clean up various > > missing features (e.g. cancellation, error metadata) and better position > > ADBC to help different data systems interoperate (e.g. by exposing more > > metadata, like table/column statistics). > > > > For details, see the PR at [3]. (The main file to read through is > adbc.h.) > > > > I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along with > > the linked PR, as version 1.1.0 of the ADBC API standard. > > > > Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. This is not a > > vote to release any packages; the first package release to support > version > > 1.1.0 of the APIs will be 0.7.0 of the packages. (So I will not merge the > > linked PR until after we release ADBC 0.6.0.) > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC 1.1.0 specification > > [ ] 0 > > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... > > > > Thanks to Sutou Kouhei, Matt Topol, Dewey Dunnington, Antoine Pitrou, > Will > > Ayd, and Will Jones for feedback on the design and various > work-in-progress > > PRs. > > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/milestone/3 > > [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/s8m4l9hccfh5kqvvd2x3gxn3ry0w1ryo > > [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/971 > > > > Thank you, > > David > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Arrow ADBC (API) 1.1.0
+1 These additions look excellent. On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 10:40 AM David Li wrote: > Hello, > > We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly > decided to treat as a specification [2]. These revisions clean up various > missing features (e.g. cancellation, error metadata) and better position > ADBC to help different data systems interoperate (e.g. by exposing more > metadata, like table/column statistics). > > For details, see the PR at [3]. (The main file to read through is adbc.h.) > > I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along with > the linked PR, as version 1.1.0 of the ADBC API standard. > > Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. This is not a > vote to release any packages; the first package release to support version > 1.1.0 of the APIs will be 0.7.0 of the packages. (So I will not merge the > linked PR until after we release ADBC 0.6.0.) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC 1.1.0 specification > [ ] 0 > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... > > Thanks to Sutou Kouhei, Matt Topol, Dewey Dunnington, Antoine Pitrou, Will > Ayd, and Will Jones for feedback on the design and various work-in-progress > PRs. > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/milestone/3 > [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/s8m4l9hccfh5kqvvd2x3gxn3ry0w1ryo > [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/971 > > Thank you, > David >
[VOTE] Apache Arrow ADBC (API) 1.1.0
Hello, We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly decided to treat as a specification [2]. These revisions clean up various missing features (e.g. cancellation, error metadata) and better position ADBC to help different data systems interoperate (e.g. by exposing more metadata, like table/column statistics). For details, see the PR at [3]. (The main file to read through is adbc.h.) I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along with the linked PR, as version 1.1.0 of the ADBC API standard. Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. This is not a vote to release any packages; the first package release to support version 1.1.0 of the APIs will be 0.7.0 of the packages. (So I will not merge the linked PR until after we release ADBC 0.6.0.) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC 1.1.0 specification [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... Thanks to Sutou Kouhei, Matt Topol, Dewey Dunnington, Antoine Pitrou, Will Ayd, and Will Jones for feedback on the design and various work-in-progress PRs. [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/milestone/3 [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/s8m4l9hccfh5kqvvd2x3gxn3ry0w1ryo [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/971 Thank you, David
