Re: Roadmap

[Jake Farrell]

Sounds like we have pretty much reached an agreement here on making it
public facing on the website, will get mechanics setup and we can start
iterating on the content from there. Thanks everyone

-Jake

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Chamin Nalinda  wrote:

> +1 I've been in this mailing list for sometime and always wonder from where
> I should start. This is a great move.
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dave Lester  wrote:
>
> > +1!
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015, at 07:45 PM, Bill Farner wrote:
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Jeffrey Davis <
> jeffrey.n.da...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 to putting it on the website as well, but if and only if it's
> titled
> > > > "squad goals"
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Zameer Manji 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 to putting it on the website.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Joseph Smith 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yep, that sounds awesome.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sep 1, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Joshua Cohen <
> > jco...@twopensource.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 to putting it on the website. I think it would help adoption
> > if we
> > > > > > have
> > > > > > > an up front and easily accessible document that first,
> indicates
> > > > we've
> > > > > > got
> > > > > > > plans!, and then goes on to explain what they are. The caveat
> is
> > that
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > the document gets stale it would serve the opposite purpose ;).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Bill Farner <
> > terasur...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> I would love to see this come together!
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I'm leaning towards putting this on the website.  This gives
> the
> > > > list
> > > > > > >> greater visibility/accessibility and richness.  I don't think
> > JIRA
> > > > is
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > >> best place, since this should evolve over time and is never
> > actually
> > > > > > >> 'finished'.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Jake Farrell <
> > jfarr...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> In an initiative and make it easier for new people coming to
> > Aurora
> > > > > to
> > > > > > >> know
> > > > > > >>> where to get started and provide community contributions I
> > would
> > > > like
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > >>> start a public roadmap (either a file within our repo or in
> > jira)
> > > > to
> > > > > > >>> make it easier for everyone to track releases and know what
> our
> > > > goals
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > >>> for each release. As part of our next release of 0.10.0 I
> would
> > > > like
> > > > > to
> > > > > > >>> start this process and keep evolving it
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Thoughts?
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> -Jake
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Zameer Manji
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Chamin Nalinda
> Research Undergraduate
> University of Colombo School of Computing (UCSC).
> Student Member IEEE (92387118)
> Student Member ACM (5654073)
>
> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/chaminnalinda
> GitHub: https://github.com/CoolCK
> SlideShare: http://www.slideshare.net/ChaminNalindaLokuGam/
> Blog: http://techspiro.blogspot.com/
>

Re: Roadmap

[Dave Lester]

Would it make sense to first create a google doc to draft/discuss ideas?

Also, how about making this part of the project documentation -- in the
/docs folder and rendered on the website?

Dave

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015, at 09:35 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Sounds like we have pretty much reached an agreement here on making it
> public facing on the website, will get mechanics setup and we can start
> iterating on the content from there. Thanks everyone
> 
> -Jake
> 
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Chamin Nalinda  wrote:
> 
> > +1 I've been in this mailing list for sometime and always wonder from where
> > I should start. This is a great move.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Dave Lester  wrote:
> >
> > > +1!
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015, at 07:45 PM, Bill Farner wrote:
> > > > :-)
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Jeffrey Davis <
> > jeffrey.n.da...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 to putting it on the website as well, but if and only if it's
> > titled
> > > > > "squad goals"
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Zameer Manji 
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 to putting it on the website.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Joseph Smith 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yep, that sounds awesome.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sep 1, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Joshua Cohen <
> > > jco...@twopensource.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 to putting it on the website. I think it would help adoption
> > > if we
> > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > an up front and easily accessible document that first,
> > indicates
> > > > > we've
> > > > > > > got
> > > > > > > > plans!, and then goes on to explain what they are. The caveat
> > is
> > > that
> > > > > > if
> > > > > > > > the document gets stale it would serve the opposite purpose ;).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Bill Farner <
> > > terasur...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> I would love to see this come together!
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I'm leaning towards putting this on the website.  This gives
> > the
> > > > > list
> > > > > > > >> greater visibility/accessibility and richness.  I don't think
> > > JIRA
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >> best place, since this should evolve over time and is never
> > > actually
> > > > > > > >> 'finished'.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Jake Farrell <
> > > jfarr...@apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> In an initiative and make it easier for new people coming to
> > > Aurora
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >> know
> > > > > > > >>> where to get started and provide community contributions I
> > > would
> > > > > like
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >>> start a public roadmap (either a file within our repo or in
> > > jira)
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > >>> make it easier for everyone to track releases and know what
> > our
> > > > > goals
> > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > >>> for each release. As part of our next release of 0.10.0 I
> > would
> > > > > like
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >>> start this process and keep evolving it
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> Thoughts?
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> -Jake
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Zameer Manji
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Chamin Nalinda
> > Research Undergraduate
> > University of Colombo School of Computing (UCSC).
> > Student Member IEEE (92387118)
> > Student Member ACM (5654073)
> >
> > LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/chaminnalinda
> > GitHub: https://github.com/CoolCK
> > SlideShare: http://www.slideshare.net/ChaminNalindaLokuGam/
> > Blog: http://techspiro.blogspot.com/
> >

Bay Area: Apache Aurora Getting Started Workshop / Unconference

[Dave Lester]

Bay Area Apache Aurora Users:

The Apache Aurora community is organizing a getting started
workshop/unconference to bootstrap potential users who are interested in
running the Mesos scheduler but would like extra instruction and
feedback. Plus, the project is now building official deb and rpm
packages that we'd love for you to test out! 

Join us for this afternoon workshop, taking place from 1pm-5pm on
Tuesday, September 15th. Afterwards we'll migrate to a nearby bar for
drinks and we hope you'll join us.

Registration:
Available via our meetup.com group:
http://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-Apache-Aurora-Users-Group/events/225070323/,
with a limited number of seats available so register soon.

Workshop Format / What to Expect: 
Several topics will be presented, including
• Basic state of the project and update on upcoming features (REST API,
etc)
• Walk attendees through running Aurora locally
• Presentation of basics for deploying Aurora in production

>From this point we'll open up to attendees, and based upon their skill
levels, questions, and experience break into smaller
groups/conversations to focus on getting them started. We hope to have a
healthy ratio of experienced Aurora developers and newbies, so there
should be opportunities to learn from experienced users.

Who Should Attend? 
Anyone who is curious about Mesos and running Apache Aurora. You may
have tried Aurora in the past and run into some issues, or perhaps you
just learned about the project. We'll cover basic topics, but our hope
is that the unconference format will allow us to have more-advanced
discussions as well. 

Location: 
Downtown San Francisco, we hope to announce this location shortly but it
will be accessible via public transportation. 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.9.0 rpms

[Joshua Cohen]

Thanks for the vagrant VM and the verification instructions. Made life much
easier!

I was able to install the rpm and successfully create a job, stat and kill
a job. +1 from me!

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Bill Farner  wrote:

> Thanks for chiming in!  This vote is specifically for RPMs targeting
> centos7.  We have not yet had a contribution for centos6 RPMs, but would
> welcome them!  The contribution would amount to implementing a builder
> similar to what you see here:
> https://github.com/apache/aurora-packaging/tree/master/builder/rpm/centos-7
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:37 PM, thinker0  wrote:
>
> > Centos-6 ??
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:53 AM Bill Farner  wrote:
> >
> > > You can see an example test environment and instructions for installing
> > > these RPMs in a branch i'm working on here:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/wfarner/aurora-packaging/tree/wfarner/deb_testing/test/rpm/centos-7
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Bill Farner 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official rpm
> > > > packaging for
> > > > Apache Aurora 0.9.0.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~wfarner/aurora/distributions/0.9.0/rpm/centos-7/
> > > > <
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/%7Ewfarner/aurora/distributions/0.9.0/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Aurora rpm packaging includes the following:
> > > > ---
> > > > The changelog is available at:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=blob;f=specs/rpm/aurora.spec;h=a559b42d73a4211891d8c7569ea7ab2a3a6993ae;hb=refs/heads/0.9.x#l328
> > > > <
> > >
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=blob_plain;f=specs/debian/changelog;hb=refs/heads/0.9.x
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The branch used to create the packaging is:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.9.x
> > > >
> > > > The packages are available at:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~wfarner/aurora/distributions/0.9.0/rpm/centos-7/
> > > > <
> > >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/%7Ewfarner/aurora/distributions/0.9.0/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Please download, verify, and test.
> > > >
> > > > The vote will close in 3 business days, on Thu Sep 3 11:00:00 PT 2015
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release these as the rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.9.0
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> > > >
> > > > I would like to get the voting started off with my own +1
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.9.0 debs

[Kevin Sweeney]

+1 to these debs

On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Bill Farner  wrote:

> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb
> packaging for
> Apache Aurora 0.9.0.
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~wfarner/aurora/distributions/0.9.0/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
>
> The Aurora deb packaging includes the following:
> ---
> The CHANGELOG is available at:
>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=blob_plain;f=specs/debian/changelog;hb=refs/heads/0.9.x
>
> The branch used to create the packaging is:
>
> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/0.9.x
>
> The packages are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~wfarner/aurora/distributions/0.9.0/deb/ubuntu-trusty/
>
> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
>
> Please download, verify, and test.
>
> The vote will close in 4 days, on Wed Sept 2 10:00:00 PT 2015
>
> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb packages for Apache Aurora 0.9.0
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
>
> I would like to get the voting started off with my own +1
>
>
> -=Bill
>

Meaning and usage of job environments

[Erb, Stephan]

Hi everyone,

I have been wondering about the environment part of Aurora jobkeys (devel, 
test, staging, staging1, ...prod). 

I guess you made the environment a first class citizen in order to enforce some 
kind of standardization. How is this working out for you in practice? 

IIRC, the current set of supported environment names is enforced by the client. 
In general, would you be opposed to moving this validation to the scheduler, so 
that it can be configured cluster wide? This would enable us to introduce 
environment names which are closer to our domain and organization.  Or is this 
even somewhat covered in the upcoming job tier implementation?

Thanks for your input,
Stephan

Jenkins build is back to normal : Aurora #1175

[Apache Jenkins Server]

See