Re: Aurora 0.20.0 Release Date

[Renan DelValle]

Waiting to get access to Aurora's Bintray to finish the 0.19.x binary
release and then I will kick off the release for 0.20.0.

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Meghdoot bhattacharya <
meghdoo...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

> Any decision on this?
>
> Thx
>
> > On Feb 9, 2018, at 8:04 AM, Stephan Erb 
> wrote:
> >
> > I think this is a good idea. Development has slowed down enough that it
> should not be difficult to cut a release.
> >
> > On 09.02.18, 02:49, "Renan DelValle"  wrote:
> >
> >All,
> >
> >Since Mesos has shipped version 1.5.0 today, should we consider
> releasing
> >0.20.0 (which supports Mesos 1.4.0) so we don't fall too far behind in
> >terms of Mesos compatibility?
> >
> >-Renan
> >
> >
>
>

Re: Aurora 0.20.0 Release Date

[Meghdoot bhattacharya]

Any decision on this?

Thx

> On Feb 9, 2018, at 8:04 AM, Stephan Erb  wrote:
> 
> I think this is a good idea. Development has slowed down enough that it 
> should not be difficult to cut a release.
> 
> On 09.02.18, 02:49, "Renan DelValle"  wrote:
> 
>All,
> 
>Since Mesos has shipped version 1.5.0 today, should we consider releasing
>0.20.0 (which supports Mesos 1.4.0) so we don't fall too far behind in
>terms of Mesos compatibility?
> 
>-Renan
> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.19.x packages

[Stephan Erb]

+1 

On 21.02.18, 20:01, "David McLaughlin"  wrote:

+1 from me.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Renan DelValle  wrote:

> Another friendly reminder that we can't release the binary packages for
> 0.19.x without at least three +1 binding votes.
>
> Not releasing a package for 0.19.x will create a problem for anyone trying
> to upgrade to later versions as we recommend upgrading version by version.
>
>  Any and all feedback regarding these binary packages, binding or
> otherwise, is welcome so that we may fix any issues that crop up.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Renan
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Renan DelValle  wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Friendly reminder to download, verify, and test so we can conclude the
> > voting!
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -Renan
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Renan DelValle 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Kicking off the voting with a +1 (binding) from me.
> >>
> >> Tested all distributions using the test scripts.
> >>
> >> -Renan
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Renan DelValle 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb
> and
> >>> rpm packaging for
> >>> Apache Aurora 0.19.x:
> >>>
> >>> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
> >>>
> >>> The Aurora deb and rpm packaging includes the following:
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> The branch used to create the packaging is:
> >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
> >>> .git;a=tree;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> >>>
> >>> The packages are available at:
> >>> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/
> >>>
> >>> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at:
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are
> >>> available here:
> >>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging
> >>> .git;a=tree;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.19.x
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The vote will close on Wed Feb 14 13:35:18 PST 2018
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora
> 0.19.x
> >>> [ ] +0
> >>> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because...
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>