Re: [Discuss] Create stackoverflow tags for python, java and go SDKs?
The new tagging also helps if they identify the runner separately (flink, spark, google-cloud-dataflow, etc.) On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 10:16 AM Rui Wang wrote: > I also agree `apache-beam` + `python` or `java` is an option. I can try to > tag SO questions by this option when there is a need to see how it will > work. > > Thanks for all of your participation to this discussion! > > -Rui > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:49 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > >> With the new filtering UI, I think separate `apache-beam` tag and >> `python` or `java` tag seems perfect. No users are using apache-beam-java, >> apache-beam-python, or apache-beam-go so I don't think we need to make it >> up. >> >> Kenn >> >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:38 AM Pablo Estrada wrote: >> >>> I am able to create the tags if we decide to go that way:) >>> >>> I have seen users relying on the 'python' tag, along with the >>> 'apache-beam' tag to specify an SDK. Maybe that's enough? What advantage >>> would come from a dedicated beam tag? >>> >>> Perhaps users will be more easily accustomed to use the >>> apache-beam-(SDK) tags, and in that case, it makes sense to add them. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> ,-P. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 8:52 AM Lukasz Cwik wrote: >>> That sounds like a good idea to me. On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:45 AM Rui Wang wrote: > Hi Community, > > When reading apache-beam related questions in stackoverflow, it > happens that some questions only mention version number(e.g. 2.8.0) but > not > mention which SDK related. Sometimes I can tell which SDK it is from code > snippets, sometime I cannot as there is no code snippet. So in order to > answer those questions I need to first comment and ask which SDK. > > I noticed that there is no tag for a specific SDK for apache beam. > Adding such tags will be helpful when > 1. Questions with such tag tell which SDK it is talking about. > 2. If Questions do not mention SDK and without such tag, I can (or > anyone else) help tag them. > > Note that creating tags is a privilege in SO that requires >1500 > reputation[1]. If people generally are ok with this idea, we will need to > ask for help in the community to see who could be able to create tags. > > > [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/help/privileges/create-tags > > Rui >
Re: [Discuss] Create stackoverflow tags for python, java and go SDKs?
I also agree `apache-beam` + `python` or `java` is an option. I can try to tag SO questions by this option when there is a need to see how it will work. Thanks for all of your participation to this discussion! -Rui On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:49 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > With the new filtering UI, I think separate `apache-beam` tag and `python` > or `java` tag seems perfect. No users are using apache-beam-java, > apache-beam-python, or apache-beam-go so I don't think we need to make it > up. > > Kenn > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:38 AM Pablo Estrada wrote: > >> I am able to create the tags if we decide to go that way:) >> >> I have seen users relying on the 'python' tag, along with the >> 'apache-beam' tag to specify an SDK. Maybe that's enough? What advantage >> would come from a dedicated beam tag? >> >> Perhaps users will be more easily accustomed to use the apache-beam-(SDK) >> tags, and in that case, it makes sense to add them. >> >> Thoughts? >> ,-P. >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 8:52 AM Lukasz Cwik wrote: >> >>> That sounds like a good idea to me. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:45 AM Rui Wang wrote: >>> Hi Community, When reading apache-beam related questions in stackoverflow, it happens that some questions only mention version number(e.g. 2.8.0) but not mention which SDK related. Sometimes I can tell which SDK it is from code snippets, sometime I cannot as there is no code snippet. So in order to answer those questions I need to first comment and ask which SDK. I noticed that there is no tag for a specific SDK for apache beam. Adding such tags will be helpful when 1. Questions with such tag tell which SDK it is talking about. 2. If Questions do not mention SDK and without such tag, I can (or anyone else) help tag them. Note that creating tags is a privilege in SO that requires >1500 reputation[1]. If people generally are ok with this idea, we will need to ask for help in the community to see who could be able to create tags. [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/help/privileges/create-tags Rui >>>
Re: [Discuss] Create stackoverflow tags for python, java and go SDKs?
With the new filtering UI, I think separate `apache-beam` tag and `python` or `java` tag seems perfect. No users are using apache-beam-java, apache-beam-python, or apache-beam-go so I don't think we need to make it up. Kenn On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:38 AM Pablo Estrada wrote: > I am able to create the tags if we decide to go that way:) > > I have seen users relying on the 'python' tag, along with the > 'apache-beam' tag to specify an SDK. Maybe that's enough? What advantage > would come from a dedicated beam tag? > > Perhaps users will be more easily accustomed to use the apache-beam-(SDK) > tags, and in that case, it makes sense to add them. > > Thoughts? > ,-P. > > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 8:52 AM Lukasz Cwik wrote: > >> That sounds like a good idea to me. >> >> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:45 AM Rui Wang wrote: >> >>> Hi Community, >>> >>> When reading apache-beam related questions in stackoverflow, it happens >>> that some questions only mention version number(e.g. 2.8.0) but not mention >>> which SDK related. Sometimes I can tell which SDK it is from code snippets, >>> sometime I cannot as there is no code snippet. So in order to answer those >>> questions I need to first comment and ask which SDK. >>> >>> I noticed that there is no tag for a specific SDK for apache beam. >>> Adding such tags will be helpful when >>> 1. Questions with such tag tell which SDK it is talking about. >>> 2. If Questions do not mention SDK and without such tag, I can (or >>> anyone else) help tag them. >>> >>> Note that creating tags is a privilege in SO that requires >1500 >>> reputation[1]. If people generally are ok with this idea, we will need to >>> ask for help in the community to see who could be able to create tags. >>> >>> >>> [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/help/privileges/create-tags >>> >>> Rui >>> >>
Re: [Discuss] Create stackoverflow tags for python, java and go SDKs?
That sounds like a good idea to me. On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 10:45 AM Rui Wang wrote: > Hi Community, > > When reading apache-beam related questions in stackoverflow, it happens > that some questions only mention version number(e.g. 2.8.0) but not mention > which SDK related. Sometimes I can tell which SDK it is from code snippets, > sometime I cannot as there is no code snippet. So in order to answer those > questions I need to first comment and ask which SDK. > > I noticed that there is no tag for a specific SDK for apache beam. Adding > such tags will be helpful when > 1. Questions with such tag tell which SDK it is talking about. > 2. If Questions do not mention SDK and without such tag, I can (or anyone > else) help tag them. > > Note that creating tags is a privilege in SO that requires >1500 > reputation[1]. If people generally are ok with this idea, we will need to > ask for help in the community to see who could be able to create tags. > > > [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/help/privileges/create-tags > > Rui >
[Discuss] Create stackoverflow tags for python, java and go SDKs?
Hi Community, When reading apache-beam related questions in stackoverflow, it happens that some questions only mention version number(e.g. 2.8.0) but not mention which SDK related. Sometimes I can tell which SDK it is from code snippets, sometime I cannot as there is no code snippet. So in order to answer those questions I need to first comment and ask which SDK. I noticed that there is no tag for a specific SDK for apache beam. Adding such tags will be helpful when 1. Questions with such tag tell which SDK it is talking about. 2. If Questions do not mention SDK and without such tag, I can (or anyone else) help tag them. Note that creating tags is a privilege in SO that requires >1500 reputation[1]. If people generally are ok with this idea, we will need to ask for help in the community to see who could be able to create tags. [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/help/privileges/create-tags Rui
