Re: [VOTE][BIP-1] Beam Schema Options

2020-03-02 Thread Alex Van Boxel
Anyone keen to review this PR:
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10413

without this foundation I can't continue with the rest.

 _/
_/ Alex Van Boxel


On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:40 PM Alex Van Boxel  wrote:

> Thank you everyone for voting: Accepted by majority vote +1 (7 votes, 3
> binding), -1 (0 votes)
>
> I added the information to the document:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options
>
> Now that the 2.20 is frozen it's the ideal moment to get the PR of the
> interface in, then I can focus on the different implementations:
> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10413
>
>  _/
> _/ Alex Van Boxel
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:25 PM Maximilian Michels  wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Looks like a useful feature to have in schemas and fields. Thank you for
>> the good write-up.
>>
>> -Max
>>
>> On 26.02.20 19:35, Alex Van Boxel wrote:
>> > Nico, thanks for the addition to SQL/MED. I could use another PMC vote
>> > to conclude the vote.
>> >
>> >   _/
>> > _/ Alex Van Boxel
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:25 PM Kenneth Knowles > > > wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Added a link to the wiki proposal for SQL/MED (Management of
>> > External Data) which treats some of the same ideas.
>> >
>> > Kenn
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 3:02 PM Brian Hulette > > > wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (non-binding) thanks for all your work on this Alex :)
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:50 AM Alex Van Boxel <
>> a...@vanboxel.be
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > I assume I can vote on my own proposal :-)
>> >
>> >   _/
>> > _/ Alex Van Boxel
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre
>> > mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Very interesting. It remembers me when we start the
>> > discussion about schema support ;)
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > JB
>> >
>> >> Le 20 févr. 2020 à 08:36, Alex Van Boxel
>> >> mailto:a...@vanboxel.be>> a écrit :
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement
>> >> Proposal. If you have a -1 or -1 (binding) please add
>> >> your concern to the open issues section to the wiki.
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> This is the proposal:
>> >>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options
>> >>
>> >> Can I have your votes.
>> >>
>> >>  _/
>> >> _/ Alex Van Boxel
>> >
>>
>


Re: [VOTE][BIP-1] Beam Schema Options

2020-02-28 Thread Alex Van Boxel
Thank you everyone for voting: Accepted by majority vote +1 (7 votes, 3
binding), -1 (0 votes)

I added the information to the document:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options

Now that the 2.20 is frozen it's the ideal moment to get the PR of the
interface in, then I can focus on the different implementations:
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10413

 _/
_/ Alex Van Boxel


On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 9:25 PM Maximilian Michels  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Looks like a useful feature to have in schemas and fields. Thank you for
> the good write-up.
>
> -Max
>
> On 26.02.20 19:35, Alex Van Boxel wrote:
> > Nico, thanks for the addition to SQL/MED. I could use another PMC vote
> > to conclude the vote.
> >
> >   _/
> > _/ Alex Van Boxel
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:25 PM Kenneth Knowles  > > wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Added a link to the wiki proposal for SQL/MED (Management of
> > External Data) which treats some of the same ideas.
> >
> > Kenn
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 3:02 PM Brian Hulette  > > wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding) thanks for all your work on this Alex :)
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:50 AM Alex Van Boxel  > > wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I assume I can vote on my own proposal :-)
> >
> >   _/
> > _/ Alex Van Boxel
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre
> > mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Very interesting. It remembers me when we start the
> > discussion about schema support ;)
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >> Le 20 févr. 2020 à 08:36, Alex Van Boxel
> >> mailto:a...@vanboxel.be>> a écrit :
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement
> >> Proposal. If you have a -1 or -1 (binding) please add
> >> your concern to the open issues section to the wiki.
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> This is the proposal:
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options
> >>
> >> Can I have your votes.
> >>
> >>  _/
> >> _/ Alex Van Boxel
> >
>


Re: [VOTE][BIP-1] Beam Schema Options

2020-02-26 Thread Maximilian Michels

+1 (binding)

Looks like a useful feature to have in schemas and fields. Thank you for 
the good write-up.


-Max

On 26.02.20 19:35, Alex Van Boxel wrote:
Nico, thanks for the addition to SQL/MED. I could use another PMC vote 
to conclude the vote.


  _/
_/ Alex Van Boxel


On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:25 PM Kenneth Knowles > wrote:


+1 (binding)

Added a link to the wiki proposal for SQL/MED (Management of
External Data) which treats some of the same ideas.

Kenn

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 3:02 PM Brian Hulette mailto:bhule...@google.com>> wrote:

+1 (non-binding) thanks for all your work on this Alex :)

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:50 AM Alex Van Boxel mailto:a...@vanboxel.be>> wrote:

+1 (non-binding)

I assume I can vote on my own proposal :-)

  _/
_/ Alex Van Boxel


On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre
mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:

+1 (binding)

Very interesting. It remembers me when we start the
discussion about schema support ;)

Regards
JB


Le 20 févr. 2020 à 08:36, Alex Van Boxel
mailto:a...@vanboxel.be>> a écrit :

Hi all,

let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement
Proposal. If you have a -1 or -1 (binding) please add
your concern to the open issues section to the wiki.
Thanks.

This is the proposal:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options

Can I have your votes.

 _/
_/ Alex Van Boxel




Re: [VOTE][BIP-1] Beam Schema Options

2020-02-26 Thread Alex Van Boxel
Nico, thanks for the addition to SQL/MED. I could use another PMC vote to
conclude the vote.

 _/
_/ Alex Van Boxel


On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:25 PM Kenneth Knowles  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Added a link to the wiki proposal for SQL/MED (Management of External
> Data) which treats some of the same ideas.
>
> Kenn
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 3:02 PM Brian Hulette  wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding) thanks for all your work on this Alex :)
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:50 AM Alex Van Boxel  wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> I assume I can vote on my own proposal :-)
>>>
>>>  _/
>>> _/ Alex Van Boxel
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 +1 (binding)

 Very interesting. It remembers me when we start the discussion about
 schema support ;)

 Regards
 JB

 Le 20 févr. 2020 à 08:36, Alex Van Boxel  a écrit :

 Hi all,

 let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement Proposal. If
 you have a -1 or -1 (binding) please add your concern to the open issues
 section to the wiki. Thanks.

 This is the proposal:

 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options

 Can I have your votes.

  _/
 _/ Alex Van Boxel





Re: [VOTE][BIP-1] Beam Schema Options

2020-02-24 Thread Kenneth Knowles
+1 (binding)

Added a link to the wiki proposal for SQL/MED (Management of External Data)
which treats some of the same ideas.

Kenn

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 3:02 PM Brian Hulette  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding) thanks for all your work on this Alex :)
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:50 AM Alex Van Boxel  wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> I assume I can vote on my own proposal :-)
>>
>>  _/
>> _/ Alex Van Boxel
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> Very interesting. It remembers me when we start the discussion about
>>> schema support ;)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> Le 20 févr. 2020 à 08:36, Alex Van Boxel  a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement Proposal. If you have
>>> a -1 or -1 (binding) please add your concern to the open issues section to
>>> the wiki. Thanks.
>>>
>>> This is the proposal:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options
>>>
>>> Can I have your votes.
>>>
>>>  _/
>>> _/ Alex Van Boxel
>>>
>>>
>>>


Re: [VOTE][BIP-1] Beam Schema Options

2020-02-21 Thread Brian Hulette
+1 (non-binding) thanks for all your work on this Alex :)

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:50 AM Alex Van Boxel  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I assume I can vote on my own proposal :-)
>
>  _/
> _/ Alex Van Boxel
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Very interesting. It remembers me when we start the discussion about
>> schema support ;)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> Le 20 févr. 2020 à 08:36, Alex Van Boxel  a écrit :
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement Proposal. If you have
>> a -1 or -1 (binding) please add your concern to the open issues section to
>> the wiki. Thanks.
>>
>> This is the proposal:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options
>>
>> Can I have your votes.
>>
>>  _/
>> _/ Alex Van Boxel
>>
>>
>>


Re: [VOTE][BIP-1] Beam Schema Options

2020-02-21 Thread Alex Van Boxel
+1 (non-binding)

I assume I can vote on my own proposal :-)

 _/
_/ Alex Van Boxel


On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Very interesting. It remembers me when we start the discussion about
> schema support ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Le 20 févr. 2020 à 08:36, Alex Van Boxel  a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement Proposal. If you have a
> -1 or -1 (binding) please add your concern to the open issues section to
> the wiki. Thanks.
>
> This is the proposal:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options
>
> Can I have your votes.
>
>  _/
> _/ Alex Van Boxel
>
>
>


Re: [VOTE][BIP-1] Beam Schema Options

2020-02-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
+1 (binding)

Very interesting. It remembers me when we start the discussion about schema 
support ;)

Regards
JB

> Le 20 févr. 2020 à 08:36, Alex Van Boxel  a écrit :
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement Proposal. If you have a -1 
> or -1 (binding) please add your concern to the open issues section to the 
> wiki. Thanks.
> 
> This is the proposal:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options
>  
> 
> 
> Can I have your votes.
> 
>  _/
> _/ Alex Van Boxel



Re: [VOTE][BIP-1] Beam Schema Options

2020-02-20 Thread Reza Rokni
+1 (non-binding) actually working on some pipelines where this would be
super useful to have now :-)

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:09 PM Robert Burke  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding) it feels like a reasonable extension, and portability is
> considered. I see no issues with eventually supporting it in the Go SDK
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 11:36 PM Alex Van Boxel  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement Proposal. If you have
>> a -1 or -1 (binding) please add your concern to the open issues section to
>> the wiki. Thanks.
>>
>> This is the proposal:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options
>>
>> Can I have your votes.
>>
>>  _/
>> _/ Alex Van Boxel
>>
>


Re: [VOTE][BIP-1] Beam Schema Options

2020-02-20 Thread Robert Burke
+1 (non-binding) it feels like a reasonable extension, and portability is
considered. I see no issues with eventually supporting it in the Go SDK

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020, 11:36 PM Alex Van Boxel  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement Proposal. If you have a
> -1 or -1 (binding) please add your concern to the open issues section to
> the wiki. Thanks.
>
> This is the proposal:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options
>
> Can I have your votes.
>
>  _/
> _/ Alex Van Boxel
>


[VOTE][BIP-1] Beam Schema Options

2020-02-19 Thread Alex Van Boxel
Hi all,

let's do a vote on the very first Beam Improvement Proposal. If you have a
-1 or -1 (binding) please add your concern to the open issues section to
the wiki. Thanks.

This is the proposal:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/%5BBIP-1%5D+Beam+Schema+Options

Can I have your votes.

 _/
_/ Alex Van Boxel