Re: [VOTE] Support ZetaSQL as another SQL dialect for BeamSQL in Beam repo
Thanks everyone for participating in this vote. As there is no vote down, I will continue the work of merging Beam ZetaSQL in Beam repo. -Rui On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:20 AM Rui Wang wrote: > +1 > > Although it would be a long way to go, I also hope it can go into Calcite. > > > -Rui > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:11 AM Lukasz Cwik wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:09 AM Andrew Pilloud >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> I also hope this can move to Calcite. >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:40 AM Gleb Kanterov wrote: >>> +1 On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:47 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote: > +1 > Wishing that this goes to calcite too someday (hoping that it makes > Beam side maintenance simpler) > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:18 AM Manu Zhang > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:55 AM Mingmin Xu > wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ryan McDowell < > ryanmcdow...@google.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Reza Rokni wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles > wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Community, > >>> > >>> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on > contributing Beam ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by > BeamSQL) to Beam repo. > >>> > >>> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design > and others on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. > Note > that this vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by > code > review. This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam > repo. > >>> > >>> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL > >>> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL > >>> > >>> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please > discuss it in [1]. > >>> > >>> [1]: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E > >>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 > >>> > >>> -Rui > > > > -- > > This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received > this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, > please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it > has > gone to the wrong person. > > The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are > provided solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to > be and do not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding > obligations will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in > final form is executed in writing by all parties involved. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Mingmin > -- Cheers, Gleb >>>
Re: [VOTE] Support ZetaSQL as another SQL dialect for BeamSQL in Beam repo
+1 Although it would be a long way to go, I also hope it can go into Calcite. -Rui On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:11 AM Lukasz Cwik wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:09 AM Andrew Pilloud > wrote: > >> +1 >> I also hope this can move to Calcite. >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:40 AM Gleb Kanterov wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:47 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote: >>> +1 Wishing that this goes to calcite too someday (hoping that it makes Beam side maintenance simpler) On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:18 AM Manu Zhang wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:55 AM Mingmin Xu wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ryan McDowell < ryanmcdow...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Reza Rokni wrote: +1 On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang wrote: >>> >>> Hi Community, >>> >>> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing Beam ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to Beam repo. >>> >>> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and others on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note that this vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code review. This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo. >>> >>> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL >>> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL >>> >>> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please discuss it in [1]. >>> >>> [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 >>> >>> -Rui -- This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone to the wrong person. The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are provided solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to be and do not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding obligations will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in final form is executed in writing by all parties involved. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Mingmin >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Gleb >>> >>
Re: [VOTE] Support ZetaSQL as another SQL dialect for BeamSQL in Beam repo
+1 On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:09 AM Andrew Pilloud wrote: > +1 > I also hope this can move to Calcite. > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:40 AM Gleb Kanterov wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:47 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> Wishing that this goes to calcite too someday (hoping that it makes >>> Beam side maintenance simpler) >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:18 AM Manu Zhang >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:55 AM Mingmin Xu >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ryan McDowell < >>> ryanmcdow...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Reza Rokni wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Community, >>> >>> >>> >>> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing >>> Beam ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to >>> Beam repo. >>> >>> >>> >>> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and >>> others on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note >>> that this vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code >>> review. This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo. >>> >>> >>> >>> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL >>> >>> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL >>> >>> >>> >>> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please >>> discuss it in [1]. >>> >>> >>> >>> [1]: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >>> >>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 >>> >>> >>> >>> -Rui >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this >>> communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please >>> erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone >>> to the wrong person. >>> >>> The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are >>> provided solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to >>> be and do not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding >>> obligations will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in >>> final form is executed in writing by all parties involved. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> >>> >> Mingmin >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Gleb >> >
Re: [VOTE] Support ZetaSQL as another SQL dialect for BeamSQL in Beam repo
+1 I also hope this can move to Calcite. On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:40 AM Gleb Kanterov wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:47 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote: > >> +1 >> Wishing that this goes to calcite too someday (hoping that it makes >> Beam side maintenance simpler) >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:18 AM Manu Zhang >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:55 AM Mingmin Xu wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ryan McDowell >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> +1 >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Reza Rokni wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles >> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi Community, >> >>> >> >>> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing >> Beam ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to >> Beam repo. >> >>> >> >>> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and >> others on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note >> that this vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code >> review. This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo. >> >>> >> >>> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL >> >>> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL >> >>> >> >>> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please >> discuss it in [1]. >> >>> >> >>> [1]: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >> >>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 >> >>> >> >>> -Rui >> >> >> >> -- >> >> This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this >> communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please >> erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone >> to the wrong person. >> >> The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are >> provided solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to >> be and do not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding >> obligations will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in >> final form is executed in writing by all parties involved. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Mingmin >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Gleb >
Re: [VOTE] Support ZetaSQL as another SQL dialect for BeamSQL in Beam repo
+1 On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:47 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote: > +1 > Wishing that this goes to calcite too someday (hoping that it makes > Beam side maintenance simpler) > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:18 AM Manu Zhang > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:55 AM Mingmin Xu wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ryan McDowell > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Reza Rokni wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles > wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Community, > >>> > >>> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing > Beam ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to > Beam repo. > >>> > >>> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and > others on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note > that this vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code > review. This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo. > >>> > >>> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL > >>> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL > >>> > >>> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please > discuss it in [1]. > >>> > >>> [1]: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E > >>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 > >>> > >>> -Rui > > > > -- > > This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this > communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please > erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone > to the wrong person. > > The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are > provided solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to > be and do not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding > obligations will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in > final form is executed in writing by all parties involved. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Mingmin > -- Cheers, Gleb
Re: [VOTE] Support ZetaSQL as another SQL dialect for BeamSQL in Beam repo
+1 Wishing that this goes to calcite too someday (hoping that it makes Beam side maintenance simpler) On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:18 AM Manu Zhang wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:55 AM Mingmin Xu wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ryan McDowell >> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Reza Rokni wrote: +1 On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang wrote: >>> >>> Hi Community, >>> >>> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing Beam >>> ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to >>> Beam repo. >>> >>> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and others >>> on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note that >>> this vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code >>> review. This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam >>> repo. >>> >>> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL >>> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL >>> >>> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please discuss it >>> in [1]. >>> >>> [1]: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 >>> >>> -Rui -- This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone to the wrong person. The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are provided solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to be and do not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding obligations will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in final form is executed in writing by all parties involved. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Mingmin
Re: [VOTE] Support ZetaSQL as another SQL dialect for BeamSQL in Beam repo
+1 On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:55 AM Mingmin Xu wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ryan McDowell > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Reza Rokni wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay wrote: >>> +1 On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang wrote: > >> Hi Community, >> >> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing Beam >> ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to Beam >> repo. >> >> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and >> others on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note >> that this vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by >> code >> review. This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam >> repo. >> >> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL >> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL >> >> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please discuss >> it in [1]. >> >> [1]: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 >> >> -Rui >> > >>> >>> -- >>> >>> This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this >>> communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please >>> erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone >>> to the wrong person. >>> >>> The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are provided >>> solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to be and do >>> not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding obligations >>> will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in final form is >>> executed in writing by all parties involved. >>> >> > > -- > > Mingmin >
Re: [VOTE] Support ZetaSQL as another SQL dialect for BeamSQL in Beam repo
+1 On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:53 PM Ryan McDowell wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Reza Rokni wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: >>> +1 On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang wrote: > Hi Community, > > I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing Beam > ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to Beam > repo. > > There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and others > on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note that this > vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code review. > This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo. > > +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL > -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL > > If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please discuss it > in [1]. > > [1]: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E > [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 > > -Rui > >> >> -- >> >> This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this >> communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please >> erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone >> to the wrong person. >> >> The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are provided >> solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to be and do >> not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding obligations >> will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in final form is >> executed in writing by all parties involved. >> > -- Mingmin
Re: [VOTE] Support ZetaSQL as another SQL dialect for BeamSQL in Beam repo
+1 On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 8:30 PM Reza Rokni wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang wrote: >>> Hi Community, I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing Beam ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to Beam repo. There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and others on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note that this vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code review. This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo. +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please discuss it in [1]. [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 -Rui >>> > > -- > > This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this > communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please > erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone > to the wrong person. > > The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are provided > solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to be and do > not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding obligations > will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in final form is > executed in writing by all parties involved. >
Re: [VOTE] Support ZetaSQL as another SQL dialect for BeamSQL in Beam repo
+1 On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 09:28, Ahmet Altay wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang wrote: >> >>> Hi Community, >>> >>> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing Beam >>> ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to Beam >>> repo. >>> >>> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and others >>> on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note that this >>> vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code review. >>> This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo. >>> >>> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL >>> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL >>> >>> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please discuss it >>> in [1]. >>> >>> [1]: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 >>> >>> -Rui >>> >> -- This email may be confidential and privileged. If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone to the wrong person. The above terms reflect a potential business arrangement, are provided solely as a basis for further discussion, and are not intended to be and do not constitute a legally binding obligation. No legally binding obligations will be created, implied, or inferred until an agreement in final form is executed in writing by all parties involved.
Re: [VOTE] Support ZetaSQL as another SQL dialect for BeamSQL in Beam repo
+1 On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:27 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang wrote: > >> Hi Community, >> >> I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing Beam >> ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to Beam >> repo. >> >> There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and others on >> Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note that this >> vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code review. >> This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo. >> >> +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL >> -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL >> >> If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please discuss it in >> [1]. >> >> [1]: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >> [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 >> >> -Rui >> >
Re: [VOTE] Support ZetaSQL as another SQL dialect for BeamSQL in Beam repo
+1 On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Rui Wang wrote: > Hi Community, > > I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing Beam > ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to Beam > repo. > > There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and others on > Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note that this > vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code review. > This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo. > > +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL > -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL > > If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please discuss it in > [1]. > > [1]: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E > [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 > > -Rui >
[VOTE] Support ZetaSQL as another SQL dialect for BeamSQL in Beam repo
Hi Community, I am using this separate thread to collect votes on contributing Beam ZetaSQL(my way to say ZetaSQL as a dialect supported by BeamSQL) to Beam repo. There are discussions related to benefits, technical design and others on Beam ZetaSQL in [1]. The Beam ZetaSQL code lives in [2]. Note that this vote is not about merging the PR, which should be decided by code review. This vote is only to vote if Beam ZetaSQL should live in Beam repo. +1: Beam repo can host Beam ZetaSQL -1: Beam repo should not host Beam ZetaSQL If there are more questions related to Beam ZetaSQL, please discuss it in [1]. [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eab70bb99218aaedfd506e979967379c0efa05ea56a792a1486f9c74@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E [2]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9210 -Rui
