Re: Portability overview webpage

[Henning Rohde]

Thanks Holden! Do you mean whether alternatives to gRPC/protobuf are being
discussed? If so, I'm not aware of any alternative proposals.

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Holden Karau  wrote:

> Awesome! Out of interest is there any discussion around common formats for
> interchange going on?
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Henning Rohde 
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks everyone! The page is now live at:
> >
> >https://beam.apache.org/contribute/portability/
> >
> > Henning
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Kenneth Knowles 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This is a superb high-level overview of the effort, understandable at a
> > > glance. I think it is the first time someone has made it clear what we
> > are
> > > actually doing!
> > >
> > > Kenn
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the update. I will take a look.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > JB
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 1, 2017, 18:21, at 18:21, Henning Rohde
> > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >Hi everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > >Although portability is a large and involved effort, it seems it
> > > > >doesn't
> > > > >have a high-level overview and plan written down anywhere. I added a
> > > > >proposed page with a 10,000 ft view and links to the webside under
> > > > >'Contribute (technical references)'. There is a page for ongoing
> > > > >projects,
> > > > >but portability is much more encompassing and seems to be more
> suited
> > > > >for
> > > > >it's own page.
> > > > >
> > > > >The PR is:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/340
> > > > >
> > > > >I'm sending it out to the dev list for more visibility. Please let
> me
> > > > >know
> > > > >if you have any comments or objections, or if there is a better
> place
> > > > >for
> > > > >this content.
> > > > >
> > > > >Thanks,
> > > > > Henning
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>

Re: Portability overview webpage

[Holden Karau]

Awesome! Out of interest is there any discussion around common formats for
interchange going on?

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Henning Rohde 
wrote:

> Thanks everyone! The page is now live at:
>
>https://beam.apache.org/contribute/portability/
>
> Henning
>
> On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Kenneth Knowles 
> wrote:
>
> > This is a superb high-level overview of the effort, understandable at a
> > glance. I think it is the first time someone has made it clear what we
> are
> > actually doing!
> >
> > Kenn
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the update. I will take a look.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Nov 1, 2017, 18:21, at 18:21, Henning Rohde
> > 
> > > wrote:
> > > >Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > >Although portability is a large and involved effort, it seems it
> > > >doesn't
> > > >have a high-level overview and plan written down anywhere. I added a
> > > >proposed page with a 10,000 ft view and links to the webside under
> > > >'Contribute (technical references)'. There is a page for ongoing
> > > >projects,
> > > >but portability is much more encompassing and seems to be more suited
> > > >for
> > > >it's own page.
> > > >
> > > >The PR is:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/340
> > > >
> > > >I'm sending it out to the dev list for more visibility. Please let me
> > > >know
> > > >if you have any comments or objections, or if there is a better place
> > > >for
> > > >this content.
> > > >
> > > >Thanks,
> > > > Henning
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau

Re: Portability overview webpage

[Kenneth Knowles]

This is a superb high-level overview of the effort, understandable at a
glance. I think it is the first time someone has made it clear what we are
actually doing!

Kenn

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
wrote:

> Thanks for the update. I will take a look.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Nov 1, 2017, 18:21, at 18:21, Henning Rohde 
> wrote:
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >Although portability is a large and involved effort, it seems it
> >doesn't
> >have a high-level overview and plan written down anywhere. I added a
> >proposed page with a 10,000 ft view and links to the webside under
> >'Contribute (technical references)'. There is a page for ongoing
> >projects,
> >but portability is much more encompassing and seems to be more suited
> >for
> >it's own page.
> >
> >The PR is:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/340
> >
> >I'm sending it out to the dev list for more visibility. Please let me
> >know
> >if you have any comments or objections, or if there is a better place
> >for
> >this content.
> >
> >Thanks,
> > Henning
>

Re: Portability overview webpage

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Thanks for the update. I will take a look.

Regards
JB

On Nov 1, 2017, 18:21, at 18:21, Henning Rohde  
wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>Although portability is a large and involved effort, it seems it
>doesn't
>have a high-level overview and plan written down anywhere. I added a
>proposed page with a 10,000 ft view and links to the webside under
>'Contribute (technical references)'. There is a page for ongoing
>projects,
>but portability is much more encompassing and seems to be more suited
>for
>it's own page.
>
>The PR is:
>
> https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/340
>
>I'm sending it out to the dev list for more visibility. Please let me
>know
>if you have any comments or objections, or if there is a better place
>for
>this content.
>
>Thanks,
> Henning

Portability overview webpage

[Henning Rohde]

Hi everyone,

Although portability is a large and involved effort, it seems it doesn't
have a high-level overview and plan written down anywhere. I added a
proposed page with a 10,000 ft view and links to the webside under
'Contribute (technical references)'. There is a page for ongoing projects,
but portability is much more encompassing and seems to be more suited for
it's own page.

The PR is:

 https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/340

I'm sending it out to the dev list for more visibility. Please let me know
if you have any comments or objections, or if there is a better place for
this content.

Thanks,
 Henning