Jenkins build is still unstable: brooklyn-master-build #22

2016-02-19 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 



Master build broken

2016-02-19 Thread Robert Moss
Hi All,

It appears the brooklyn-master-build is failing[1].  This means that no
snapshots have been published to the maven since 10th Feb.  Would anyone be
will to help me resolve this, as there are commits which have been commited
recently which we'd like to make use of in our downstream brooklyn-tosca
project?

Robert

[1] https://builds.apache.org/job/brooklyn-master-build/


Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI

2016-02-19 Thread Guglielmo Nigri
+1

On 19 February 2016 at 11:32, Mark McKenna 
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 at 15:25 Richard Downer  wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> > CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> > command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> > UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> > deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> > and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> > addition to the Brooklyn project.
> >
> > The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> > with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
> > >150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> > the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> > process before merging the PR.
> >
> > This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> > favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> > the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> > Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> > 21st February 2016)
> >
> > [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> > [ ] 0, no opinion
> > [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard.
> >
> --
> *Mark McKenna*
>   *twitter:* @markmckenna 
>   *pgp:* public-key
> 
>


Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI

2016-02-19 Thread Mark McKenna
+1

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 at 15:25 Richard Downer  wrote:

> All,
>
> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> addition to the Brooklyn project.
>
> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
> >150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> process before merging the PR.
>
> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
> 21st February 2016)
>
> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> [ ] 0, no opinion
> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>
-- 
*Mark McKenna*
  *twitter:* @markmckenna 
  *pgp:* public-key



[GitHub] incubator-brooklyn pull request: Uses externally accessible addres...

2016-02-19 Thread nakomis
Github user nakomis commented on the pull request:


https://github.com/apache/incubator-brooklyn/pull/1168#issuecomment-186160816
  
/bump @sjcorbett @grkvlt @aledsage Any input on @ahgittin's comments?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI

2016-02-19 Thread Aleksandr Vasilev
+1

On Thursday, February 18, 2016, Morgan Wright 
wrote:

> +1
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:00 AM Morgan Wright  >
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:52 AM Duncan Godwin <
> > duncan.god...@cloudsoftcorp.com > wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On 18 February 2016 at 15:51, David Lloyd  > wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > /Dave.
> >> >
> >> > On 18/02/2016 15:25, Richard Downer wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> All,
> >> >>
> >> >> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
> >> >> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
> >> >> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the
> web
> >> >> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
> >> >> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
> >> >> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
> >> >> addition to the Brooklyn project.
> >> >>
> >> >> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
> >> >> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
> >> >>
> >> >>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
> >> >>>
> >> >> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
> >> >> process before merging the PR.
> >> >>
> >> >> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
> >> >> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC
> and
> >> >> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
> >> >> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
> >> >>
> >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on
> Sunday
> >> >> 21st February 2016)
> >> >>
> >> >> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
> >> >> [ ] 0, no opinion
> >> >> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Richard.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>


-- 
Best Regards,

Aleksandr Vasilev
DevOps Engineer | Cloudsoft Corporation


Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Brooklyn CLI

2016-02-19 Thread Morgan Wright
+1
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:00 AM Morgan Wright 
wrote:

>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:52 AM Duncan Godwin <
> duncan.god...@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On 18 February 2016 at 15:51, David Lloyd  wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > /Dave.
>> >
>> > On 18/02/2016 15:25, Richard Downer wrote:
>> >
>> >> All,
>> >>
>> >> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/1 adds the Brooklyn
>> >> CLI. This allows a user to control and script Brooklyn from the
>> >> command line. It opens up many possibilities, including making the web
>> >> UI optional (reducing the security footprint in production
>> >> deployments), allowing admins to script Brooklyn using shell scripts,
>> >> and simplifies our getting started tutorials. It's a very compelling
>> >> addition to the Brooklyn project.
>> >>
>> >> The CLI was developed in a non-Apache location starting last year,
>> >> with the bulk of development happening from November onwards. It has
>> >>
>> >>> 150 commits from 4 authors and is over 6,000 SLOC. Given the size of
>> >>>
>> >> the contribution, it is prudent to follow Apache's IP clearance
>> >> process before merging the PR.
>> >>
>> >> This vote is to discover if the Brooklyn PMC and community are in
>> >> favour of accepting this contribution. If the vote passes, the PMC and
>> >> the authors of the code will work together to complete Apache's IP
>> >> Clearance process and merge the code for the CLI.
>> >>
>> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours (i.e. 15:30 UTC on Sunday
>> >> 21st February 2016)
>> >>
>> >> [ ] +1, accept contribution of the Brooklyn CLI into the project
>> >> [ ] 0, no opinion
>> >> [ ] -1, reject contribution because...
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Richard.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>