Build failed in Jenkins: brooklyn-master-build-docker-pipeline #121

2019-01-18 Thread Apache Jenkins Server 
See 


--
[...truncated 135313 lines...]
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.3/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.4/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.5/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.5/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.5/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.5/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.5/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.5/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.5/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.5/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.5/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.5/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.5/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.5/1.5 MB
Progress (1): 1.5 MB

Downloaded from central: 
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/com/google/guava/guava/10.0.1/guava-10.0.1.jar
 (1.5 MB at 4.8 MB/s)
[INFO] Node v8.4.0 is already installed.
[INFO] NPM 5.4.1 is already installed.
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- frontend-maven-plugin:1.3:npm (npm install) @ brooklyn-ui-utils ---
[INFO] Running 'npm install' in 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/brooklyn-master-build-docker-pipeline/brooklyn-ui/ui-modules/utils
[ERROR] Unhandled rejection Error: EACCES: permission denied, mkdir '/.npm'
[ERROR] Unhandled rejection Error: EACCES: permission denied, mkdir '/.npm'
[ERROR] Unhandled rejection Error: EACCES: permission denied, mkdir '/.npm'
[ERROR] Unhandled rejection Error: EACCES: permission denied, mkdir '/.npm'
[ERROR] Unhandled rejection Error: EACCES: permission denied, mkdir '/.npm'
[ERROR] Unhandled rejection Error: EACCES: permission denied, mkdir '/.npm'
[ERROR] Unhandled rejection Error: EACCES: permission denied, mkdir '/.npm'
[ERROR] Unhandled rejection Error: EACCES: permission denied, mkdir '/.npm'
[ERROR] Unhandled rejection Error: EACCES: permission denied, mkdir '/.npm'
[ERROR] Unhandled rejection Error: EACCES: permission denied, mkdir '/.npm'
[ERROR] 
[ERROR] 
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────┐
[ERROR] │   npm update check failed│
[ERROR] │ Try running with sudo or get access  │
[ERROR] │ to the local update config store via │
[ERROR] │ sudo chown -R $USER:$(id -gn $USER) /.config │
[ERROR] 
└──────────────────────────────────────────────┘
[ERROR] npm ERR! cb() never called!
[ERROR] 
[ERROR] npm ERR! This is an error with npm itself. Please report this error at:
[ERROR] npm ERR! 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO] 
[INFO] Brooklyn Server Root ... SUCCESS [  5.694 s]
[INFO] Brooklyn Parent Project  SUCCESS [  6.836 s]
[INFO] Brooklyn Test Support Utilities  SUCCESS [  8.563 s]
[INFO] Brooklyn Logback Includable Configuration .. SUCCESS [  0.431 s]
[INFO] Brooklyn Common Utilities .. SUCCESS [ 31.528 s]
[INFO] Brooklyn API ... SUCCESS [  3.544 s]
[INFO] CAMP Server Parent Project . SUCCESS [  0.260 s]
[INFO] CAMP Base .. SUCCESS [  3.662 s]
[INFO] Brooklyn Test Support .. SUCCESS [  2.259 s]
[INFO] Brooklyn REST Swagger Apidoc Utilities . SUCCESS [ 13.844 s]
[INFO] Brooklyn Logback Configuration . SUCCESS [  0.253 s]
[INFO] CAMP Server  SUCCESS [ 12.911 s]
[INFO] Brooklyn Felix Runtime . SUCCESS [  3.323 s]
[INFO] Brooklyn Groovy Utilities .. SUCCESS [  2.161 s]
[INFO] Brooklyn Core .. SUCCESS [04:34 min]
[INFO] Brooklyn Policies .. SUCCESS [ 35.337 s]
[INFO] Brooklyn WinRM Software Entities ... SUCCESS [ 21.091 s]
[INFO] Brooklyn Secure JMXMP Agent

[jira] [Closed] (BROOKLYN-606) ATG Stores (client) impression & MUV usage is incorrect

2019-01-18 Thread Alex Heneveld (JIRA) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Alex Heneveld closed BROOKLYN-606.
--
Resolution: Invalid

> ATG Stores (client) impression & MUV usage is incorrect
> ---
>
> Key: BROOKLYN-606
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-606
> Project: Brooklyn
>  Issue Type: Test
>Reporter: Jim Cadigan
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ATG impressions calculator 1.jpg, ATG impressions 
> calculator 2.jpg
>
>
> I don't know how to log a Jira ticket.  I'm the AE on the ATG Stores account 
> (Lowe's Canada) with Subscription 
> #[285656357|https://optimizely.lightning.force.com/lightning/r/Subscription__c/a5rC0008SRsIAM/view]
>  in Salesforce.  They are interested in adding more websites which they will 
> have to upgrade to the Impressions model to do.   When we calculate the 
> Impressions / MUV in ChartIO impressions calculator (go/impressions) it is 
> estimating the Impressions at 39 million and the MUVs at 6.76 million - which 
> is way too high according to the CSM.  The CSM believes based on the number 
> of tests they've run it shouldn't be close to that high of amount.   Can 
> someone please look into this further?   We have a call to discuss their 
> options on Tuesday (1/22) so if possible we would like an accurate estimate 
> by that time (or soon thereafter).   Jim Cadigan 
> [jim.cadi...@optimizely.com|mailto:jim.cadi...@optimizely.com]
>  
> https://chartio.com/optimizelyinc/impressions/?ev459912=285656357=12690680070=12109898642=11925673319=11617832294=11359124158=11081888145=10941983808=10793822095=10673231236=10523345766=10408300039=10200184135



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Commented] (BROOKLYN-606) ATG Stores (client) impression & MUV usage is incorrect

2019-01-18 Thread Alex Heneveld (JIRA) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16746533#comment-16746533
 ] 

Alex Heneveld commented on BROOKLYN-606:


Thanks, you guys are in the wrong Jira.  This is for the Apache Foundation's 
Brooklyn project.  :)

> ATG Stores (client) impression & MUV usage is incorrect
> ---
>
> Key: BROOKLYN-606
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-606
> Project: Brooklyn
>  Issue Type: Test
>Reporter: Jim Cadigan
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ATG impressions calculator 1.jpg, ATG impressions 
> calculator 2.jpg
>
>
> I don't know how to log a Jira ticket.  I'm the AE on the ATG Stores account 
> (Lowe's Canada) with Subscription 
> #[285656357|https://optimizely.lightning.force.com/lightning/r/Subscription__c/a5rC0008SRsIAM/view]
>  in Salesforce.  They are interested in adding more websites which they will 
> have to upgrade to the Impressions model to do.   When we calculate the 
> Impressions / MUV in ChartIO impressions calculator (go/impressions) it is 
> estimating the Impressions at 39 million and the MUVs at 6.76 million - which 
> is way too high according to the CSM.  The CSM believes based on the number 
> of tests they've run it shouldn't be close to that high of amount.   Can 
> someone please look into this further?   We have a call to discuss their 
> options on Tuesday (1/22) so if possible we would like an accurate estimate 
> by that time (or soon thereafter).   Jim Cadigan 
> [jim.cadi...@optimizely.com|mailto:jim.cadi...@optimizely.com]
>  
> https://chartio.com/optimizelyinc/impressions/?ev459912=285656357=12690680070=12109898642=11925673319=11617832294=11359124158=11081888145=10941983808=10793822095=10673231236=10523345766=10408300039=10200184135



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Commented] (BROOKLYN-606) ATG Stores (client) impression & MUV usage is incorrect

2019-01-18 Thread Stephen Loase (JIRA) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16746529#comment-16746529
 ] 

Stephen Loase commented on BROOKLYN-606:


Correct, go to go/IST or link.optimizely.com/IST and choose category 10.
Data Warehouse / Report a Bug

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:48 AM Jim Cadigan 


-- 

*Stephen Loase*

Sr. Manager, IST Support | Optimizely  | go/ist
| go/gethelp


stephen.lo...@optimizely.com  | +1.415.500.1853

631 Howard St. Suite 100, San Francisco, CA 94105


> ATG Stores (client) impression & MUV usage is incorrect
> ---
>
> Key: BROOKLYN-606
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-606
> Project: Brooklyn
>  Issue Type: Test
>Reporter: Jim Cadigan
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ATG impressions calculator 1.jpg, ATG impressions 
> calculator 2.jpg
>
>
> I don't know how to log a Jira ticket.  I'm the AE on the ATG Stores account 
> (Lowe's Canada) with Subscription 
> #[285656357|https://optimizely.lightning.force.com/lightning/r/Subscription__c/a5rC0008SRsIAM/view]
>  in Salesforce.  They are interested in adding more websites which they will 
> have to upgrade to the Impressions model to do.   When we calculate the 
> Impressions / MUV in ChartIO impressions calculator (go/impressions) it is 
> estimating the Impressions at 39 million and the MUVs at 6.76 million - which 
> is way too high according to the CSM.  The CSM believes based on the number 
> of tests they've run it shouldn't be close to that high of amount.   Can 
> someone please look into this further?   We have a call to discuss their 
> options on Tuesday (1/22) so if possible we would like an accurate estimate 
> by that time (or soon thereafter).   Jim Cadigan 
> [jim.cadi...@optimizely.com|mailto:jim.cadi...@optimizely.com]
>  
> https://chartio.com/optimizelyinc/impressions/?ev459912=285656357=12690680070=12109898642=11925673319=11617832294=11359124158=11081888145=10941983808=10793822095=10673231236=10523345766=10408300039=10200184135



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Commented] (BROOKLYN-606) ATG Stores (client) impression & MUV usage is incorrect

2019-01-18 Thread Jim Cadigan (JIRA) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16746526#comment-16746526
 ] 

Jim Cadigan commented on BROOKLYN-606:
--

It's mis-reported.   I have an issue with the way that the go/impressions
is calculating the MUV / Impression usage for a customer.   Do you know how
that should be reported?   I was told to open a Jira ticket.

Thanks,

Jim

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:26 PM Alex Heneveld (JIRA) 



-- 
*Jim Cadigan*
Enterprise Account Executive - Mid-Atlantic | Optimizely, Inc.

*jim.cadi...@optimizely.com *  | M -
609-610-4944


> ATG Stores (client) impression & MUV usage is incorrect
> ---
>
> Key: BROOKLYN-606
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-606
> Project: Brooklyn
>  Issue Type: Test
>Reporter: Jim Cadigan
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ATG impressions calculator 1.jpg, ATG impressions 
> calculator 2.jpg
>
>
> I don't know how to log a Jira ticket.  I'm the AE on the ATG Stores account 
> (Lowe's Canada) with Subscription 
> #[285656357|https://optimizely.lightning.force.com/lightning/r/Subscription__c/a5rC0008SRsIAM/view]
>  in Salesforce.  They are interested in adding more websites which they will 
> have to upgrade to the Impressions model to do.   When we calculate the 
> Impressions / MUV in ChartIO impressions calculator (go/impressions) it is 
> estimating the Impressions at 39 million and the MUVs at 6.76 million - which 
> is way too high according to the CSM.  The CSM believes based on the number 
> of tests they've run it shouldn't be close to that high of amount.   Can 
> someone please look into this further?   We have a call to discuss their 
> options on Tuesday (1/22) so if possible we would like an accurate estimate 
> by that time (or soon thereafter).   Jim Cadigan 
> [jim.cadi...@optimizely.com|mailto:jim.cadi...@optimizely.com]
>  
> https://chartio.com/optimizelyinc/impressions/?ev459912=285656357=12690680070=12109898642=11925673319=11617832294=11359124158=11081888145=10941983808=10793822095=10673231236=10523345766=10408300039=10200184135



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Commented] (BROOKLYN-606) ATG Stores (client) impression & MUV usage is incorrect

2019-01-18 Thread Alex Heneveld (JIRA) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16746512#comment-16746512
 ] 

Alex Heneveld commented on BROOKLYN-606:


Is this spam or just mis-reported? cc [~infrastruct...@apache.org] 

Unless anyone can explain how this relates to Apache Brooklyn let's close.

> ATG Stores (client) impression & MUV usage is incorrect
> ---
>
> Key: BROOKLYN-606
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-606
> Project: Brooklyn
>  Issue Type: Test
>Reporter: Jim Cadigan
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: ATG impressions calculator 1.jpg, ATG impressions 
> calculator 2.jpg
>
>
> I don't know how to log a Jira ticket.  I'm the AE on the ATG Stores account 
> (Lowe's Canada) with Subscription 
> #[285656357|https://optimizely.lightning.force.com/lightning/r/Subscription__c/a5rC0008SRsIAM/view]
>  in Salesforce.  They are interested in adding more websites which they will 
> have to upgrade to the Impressions model to do.   When we calculate the 
> Impressions / MUV in ChartIO impressions calculator (go/impressions) it is 
> estimating the Impressions at 39 million and the MUVs at 6.76 million - which 
> is way too high according to the CSM.  The CSM believes based on the number 
> of tests they've run it shouldn't be close to that high of amount.   Can 
> someone please look into this further?   We have a call to discuss their 
> options on Tuesday (1/22) so if possible we would like an accurate estimate 
> by that time (or soon thereafter).   Jim Cadigan 
> [jim.cadi...@optimizely.com|mailto:jim.cadi...@optimizely.com]
>  
> https://chartio.com/optimizelyinc/impressions/?ev459912=285656357=12690680070=12109898642=11925673319=11617832294=11359124158=11081888145=10941983808=10793822095=10673231236=10523345766=10408300039=10200184135



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[jira] [Created] (BROOKLYN-606) ATG Stores (client) impression & MUV usage is incorrect

2019-01-18 Thread Jim Cadigan (JIRA) 
Jim Cadigan created BROOKLYN-606:


 Summary: ATG Stores (client) impression & MUV usage is incorrect
 Key: BROOKLYN-606
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-606
 Project: Brooklyn
  Issue Type: Test
Reporter: Jim Cadigan
 Attachments: ATG impressions calculator 1.jpg, ATG impressions 
calculator 2.jpg

I don't know how to log a Jira ticket.  I'm the AE on the ATG Stores account 
(Lowe's Canada) with Subscription 
#[285656357|https://optimizely.lightning.force.com/lightning/r/Subscription__c/a5rC0008SRsIAM/view]
 in Salesforce.  They are interested in adding more websites which they will 
have to upgrade to the Impressions model to do.   When we calculate the 
Impressions / MUV in ChartIO impressions calculator (go/impressions) it is 
estimating the Impressions at 39 million and the MUVs at 6.76 million - which 
is way too high according to the CSM.  The CSM believes based on the number of 
tests they've run it shouldn't be close to that high of amount.   Can someone 
please look into this further?   We have a call to discuss their options on 
Tuesday (1/22) so if possible we would like an accurate estimate by that time 
(or soon thereafter).   Jim Cadigan 
[jim.cadi...@optimizely.com|mailto:jim.cadi...@optimizely.com]

 

https://chartio.com/optimizelyinc/impressions/?ev459912=285656357=12690680070=12109898642=11925673319=11617832294=11359124158=11081888145=10941983808=10793822095=10673231236=10523345766=10408300039=10200184135



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

[GitHub] tbouron commented on a change in pull request #169: Fixes JBoss 6 & 7 logos in catalog

2019-01-18 Thread GitBox 
tbouron commented on a change in pull request #169: Fixes JBoss 6 & 7 logos in 
catalog
URL: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-library/pull/169#discussion_r248994554
 
 

 ##
 File path: software/webapp/src/main/resources/catalog.bom
 ##
 @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ brooklyn.catalog:
 type: org.apache.brooklyn.entity.proxy.LoadBalancerCluster
 name: Load-balanced Cluster
 description: |
-  A cluster of load balancers; configuring the cluster (through the 
LoadBalancer interface)
+  A cluster of load balancers; configuring the cluster (thrTough the 
LoadBalancer interface)
 
 Review comment:
   Looks like you introduced a typo  ;)


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

[GitHub] asfgit commented on issue #169: Fixes JBoss 6 & 7 logos in catalog

2019-01-18 Thread GitBox 
asfgit commented on issue #169: Fixes JBoss 6 & 7 logos in catalog
URL: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-library/pull/169#issuecomment-455498928
 
 
   Can one of the admins verify this patch?


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

[GitHub] nakomis opened a new pull request #169: Fixes JBoss 6 & 7 logos in catalog

2019-01-18 Thread GitBox 
nakomis opened a new pull request #169: Fixes JBoss 6 & 7 logos in catalog
URL: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-library/pull/169
 
 
   Fixes JBoss 6 & 7 logos in catalog


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services