+1 On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 15:12, Alex Heneveld <a...@cloudsoft.io> wrote:
> +1 from me too - new features have stabilized, including workflow and > kubernetes updates so this makes sense > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 20:38, Geoff Macartney <geoff.macart...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Juan, > > > > +1 from me. A new release is long overdue. > > > > Cheers > > Geoff > > > > > > > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, 12:31 Juan Cabrerizo, <jcabrer...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Hello, Brooklyn developers and users, > > > > > > I completely missed a comment on a closed PR [1] last December asking > for > > > cutting a new Brooklyn release that includes it. > > > > > > The fact is, Brooklyn 1.0.0 was released almost four years ago, and > since > > > then, new features have been added and vulnerable dependencies > replaced. > > > > > > It is probably a good time to release 1.1.0. I wonder if anyone is > > working > > > on something that wants to be part of it. > > > > > > It would be great to have others' opinions here. > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/86#issuecomment-1869669313 > > > > > > -- Cheers, Iuliana Cosmina
