Re: Time to do a new release?

[Duncan Grant]

+1

On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 09:26, Iuliana Cosmina  wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 15:12, Alex Heneveld  wrote:
>
> > +1 from me too - new features have stabilized, including workflow and
> > kubernetes updates so this makes sense
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 20:38, Geoff Macartney  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Juan,
> > >
> > > +1 from me. A new release is long overdue.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Geoff
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, 12:31 Juan Cabrerizo, 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello, Brooklyn developers and users,
> > > >
> > > > I completely missed a comment on a closed PR [1] last December asking
> > for
> > > > cutting a new Brooklyn release that includes it.
> > > >
> > > > The fact is, Brooklyn 1.0.0 was released almost four years ago, and
> > since
> > > > then, new features have been added and vulnerable dependencies
> > replaced.
> > > >
> > > > It is probably a good time to release 1.1.0. I wonder if anyone is
> > > working
> > > > on something that wants to be part of it.
> > > >
> > > > It would be great to have others' opinions here.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/86#issuecomment-1869669313
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Iuliana Cosmina
>

Brooklyn 1.1.0 Release

[Duncan Grant]

All,
I've got a bit of free time this week and it looks like at least a few folk
think that doing a release is a good idea.  So I'll start going through the
process of preparing a release as documented here [1] and we can do a
formal release vote once we have a candidate.
I'll update this thread with any progress I make.

Regards
Duncan
[1]
https://brooklyn.apache.org/developers/committers/release-process/index.html