+1

On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Antoine Toulme <anto...@lunar-ocean.com>wrote:

> +1, of course.
>
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Peter Donald <pe...@realityforge.org
> >wrote:
>
> > We're voting on the source distributions available here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.12/dist/
> >
> > Specifically:
> > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.12/dist/buildr-1.4.12.tgz
> > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.12/dist/buildr-1.4.12.zip
> >
> > The documentation generated for this release is available here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.12/site/
> > http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.12/site/buildr.pdf
> >
> > The following changes were made since 1.4.11:
> >
> >   * Added:  BUILDR-648 Add new package(:test_jar) packaging type.
> >             Submitted by Mike Pettypiece.
> >   * Fixed:  BUILDR-666 ZipFile.open modifies file regardless of usage.
> >             Reported by Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt, fix by Alex Boisvert.
> >   * Change: Moved to using TravisCI to test the Linux variants.
> >   * Added:  Make the location of the wsdl in generated source
> configurable
> >             in the wsgen addon.
> >   * Added:  When generating the GWT facet for Intellij IDEA modules, use
> >             the gwt-dev maven artifact dependency if present as the SDK,
> >             falling back to the existing behaviour if not possible.
> >   * Added:  Improved support for auto-detection of VCS dirs when creating
> >             IDEA projects.
> >   * Added:  Added support for SuperDevMode in gwt addon and upgraded to
> >             GWT 2.5.1 by default.
> >   * Change: BUILDR-664 Update Checkstyle addon so that extra_dependencies
> > is
> >             empty by default. Submitted by Dieter Vrancken.
> >   * Fixed:  BUILDR-663 require 'buildr' fails for Ruby 2.0.0.
> >   * Fixed:  BUILDR-665 Java artifacts in build.yaml breaking ArchiveTask.
> >             Submitted by Antonio PĂ©rez Barrero.
> >   * Fixed:  BUILDR-662 reported time is much shorter than actual
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Peter Donald
> >
>

Reply via email to