Re: New Apache Cassandra Group on LinkedIn

2022-03-14 Thread Patrick McFadin
I think that is a fair perspective based on the history of this project.
I'm not ready to give up on trying to figure it out though. I worry about
the Cassandra project being isolated when it's really not true.

If there is a clear policy on something like a retweet with clear
intentions and within established guidelines, I feel this is possible.

1. A retweet is not an endorsement and is simply for awareness of the
community at large.
2. Back to basics. If the project or product follows ASF trademark then it
is good to go. "powered By Apache Cassandra" etc
3. Content that doesn't adhere to trademark rules is ignored (and possibly
flagged by the PMC for a follow-up)

Incentivize the good behaviors and show a thriving ecosystem.
Disincentivize the bad behaviors and help bring more into compliance.

Patrick



On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:19 AM Eric Evans  wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:39 PM Patrick McFadin 
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if they can merge groups but from what I'm reading that
>> wouldn't work either. What I'm seeing is a desire to not "promote vendors"
>> which I believe is working against the project's self-interest. LinkedIn is
>> the perfect place to do it. The allergic reaction the project has taken for
>> vendors has made our ecosystem look weak when that's not really the case.
>> Temporal, Prometheus, Feast, Orkes (to just name a few) all have Cassandra
>> integrations but you would never know that by looking at any official
>> Cassandra communication because ecosystem == vendor == bad. The result is
>> that Cassandra looks like an island that will never help this project grow.
>>
>
> The problem comes when you try to balance being informative versus
> (creating the impression of )advocacy, while being fair and equitable.
> We've been here, done this, and were never able to walk these lines in a
> way that satisfied a consensus.  It's not worth it IMO.
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:20 AM Jeremy Hanna 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible to ask someone at linkedin to merge the groups together
>>> so that it's managed by the PMC but with the explicit permission of the
>>> people running the other group?  In the past, I know that Twitter does
>>> things like that in terms of handles and followers.  Is that a desirable
>>> outcome?
>>>
>>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 11:00 AM, Benjamin Lerer  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Patrick,
>>> Thanks for reaching out. Effectively the discussion has happened between
>>> the PMC members.
>>> To explain the context, we wanted to have an official group on Linkedin
>>> to publish news about the project as we do through the @cassandra handler
>>> on Twitter. We wanted a group that was vendor independent and focused on
>>> Apache Cassandra and its ecosystem.
>>> To be fully transparent, we had no idea that you were in charge of the
>>> Apache Cassandra Users group as it appears managed by Lynn Bender and
>>> Joanna Kapel. The group also appears to promote different vendors which is
>>> something that we wanted to avoid.
>>> Having to post things under Lynn's name was also an issue for us as we
>>> wished the merits to go to the right persons.
>>>
>>> Now, I am sure that we can work out some solution that will benefit the
>>> community. :-)
>>>
>>> Le mer. 9 mars 2022 à 15:56, Patrick McFadin  a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>> I feel like this needs to be a discussion held on the public mailing
>>>> list. I have been running the Apache Cassandra Users group on LinkedIn for
>>>> years after taking it over from Lynn Bender.
>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/groups/3803052/
>>>>
>>>> We have over 7500 members and had its ups and downs but it's been
>>>> pretty consistent as a professional resource on LinkedIn. I'm not sure what
>>>> there is to gain by creating competing groups. If we need more managers in
>>>> the group that's fine but somebody just needed to ask. It's clear that this
>>>> discussion happened somewhere else and this was just an announcement.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:41 AM Benjamin Lerer 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>>
>>>>> We just created a new Apache Cassandra group on LinkedIn (
>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/groups/9159443/).
>>>>>
>>>>> This group will be managed by our community and will respect vendor
>>>>> neutrality.
>>>>> Do not hesitate to join and share your experiences or blog posts with
>>>>> us :-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>


Re: New Apache Cassandra Group on LinkedIn

2022-03-14 Thread Eric Evans
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 12:39 PM Patrick McFadin  wrote:

> I'm not sure if they can merge groups but from what I'm reading that
> wouldn't work either. What I'm seeing is a desire to not "promote vendors"
> which I believe is working against the project's self-interest. LinkedIn is
> the perfect place to do it. The allergic reaction the project has taken for
> vendors has made our ecosystem look weak when that's not really the case.
> Temporal, Prometheus, Feast, Orkes (to just name a few) all have Cassandra
> integrations but you would never know that by looking at any official
> Cassandra communication because ecosystem == vendor == bad. The result is
> that Cassandra looks like an island that will never help this project grow.
>

The problem comes when you try to balance being informative versus
(creating the impression of )advocacy, while being fair and equitable.
We've been here, done this, and were never able to walk these lines in a
way that satisfied a consensus.  It's not worth it IMO.


>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:20 AM Jeremy Hanna 
> wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to ask someone at linkedin to merge the groups together so
>> that it's managed by the PMC but with the explicit permission of the people
>> running the other group?  In the past, I know that Twitter does things like
>> that in terms of handles and followers.  Is that a desirable outcome?
>>
>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 11:00 AM, Benjamin Lerer  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Patrick,
>> Thanks for reaching out. Effectively the discussion has happened between
>> the PMC members.
>> To explain the context, we wanted to have an official group on Linkedin
>> to publish news about the project as we do through the @cassandra handler
>> on Twitter. We wanted a group that was vendor independent and focused on
>> Apache Cassandra and its ecosystem.
>> To be fully transparent, we had no idea that you were in charge of the
>> Apache Cassandra Users group as it appears managed by Lynn Bender and
>> Joanna Kapel. The group also appears to promote different vendors which is
>> something that we wanted to avoid.
>> Having to post things under Lynn's name was also an issue for us as we
>> wished the merits to go to the right persons.
>>
>> Now, I am sure that we can work out some solution that will benefit the
>> community. :-)
>>
>> Le mer. 9 mars 2022 à 15:56, Patrick McFadin  a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> I feel like this needs to be a discussion held on the public mailing
>>> list. I have been running the Apache Cassandra Users group on LinkedIn for
>>> years after taking it over from Lynn Bender.
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/groups/3803052/
>>>
>>> We have over 7500 members and had its ups and downs but it's been pretty
>>> consistent as a professional resource on LinkedIn. I'm not sure what there
>>> is to gain by creating competing groups. If we need more managers in the
>>> group that's fine but somebody just needed to ask. It's clear that this
>>> discussion happened somewhere else and this was just an announcement.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:41 AM Benjamin Lerer  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>
>>>> We just created a new Apache Cassandra group on LinkedIn (
>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/groups/9159443/).
>>>>
>>>> This group will be managed by our community and will respect vendor
>>>> neutrality.
>>>> Do not hesitate to join and share your experiences or blog posts with
>>>> us :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>


Re: New Apache Cassandra Group on LinkedIn

2022-03-09 Thread Erick Ramirez
I really like Melissa's idea of having a company instead for higher
visibility and members not having to join a group to see the activity. It
also makes it easy to tag the company in posts and get more engagement that
way. Cheers!


Re: New Apache Cassandra Group on LinkedIn

2022-03-09 Thread Melissa Logan
I agree there should be an official LinkedIn page for the project hosted by
the community. It's an easy way for people to stay current.

If the goal of the new LinkedIn page is to publicly and broadly share what
the Cassandra community is doing, one solution would be to change the new
Cassandra page from a "group" page to a "company" page.

Company pages show all posts publicly by default, and admins don't have to
manage requests to join. Anyone can "follow" the page and see/share the
posts -- while only allowing community admins to publish. This would also
require less care and feeding from community admins. (What I don't know if
it's easy to "convert" a group page to company or if it requires starting
from scratch.)

Then, admins of the existing "group" page could repost any/all items from
the community page to keep people informed.

This solution could help both pages achieve their goals of spreading the
word about Cassandra.


On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 10:39 AM Patrick McFadin  wrote:

> I'm not sure if they can merge groups but from what I'm reading that
> wouldn't work either. What I'm seeing is a desire to not "promote vendors"
> which I believe is working against the project's self-interest. LinkedIn is
> the perfect place to do it. The allergic reaction the project has taken for
> vendors has made our ecosystem look weak when that's not really the case.
> Temporal, Prometheus, Feast, Orkes (to just name a few) all have Cassandra
> integrations but you would never know that by looking at any official
> Cassandra communication because ecosystem == vendor == bad. The result is
> that Cassandra looks like an island that will never help this project grow.
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:20 AM Jeremy Hanna 
> wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to ask someone at linkedin to merge the groups together so
>> that it's managed by the PMC but with the explicit permission of the people
>> running the other group?  In the past, I know that Twitter does things like
>> that in terms of handles and followers.  Is that a desirable outcome?
>>
>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 11:00 AM, Benjamin Lerer  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Patrick,
>> Thanks for reaching out. Effectively the discussion has happened between
>> the PMC members.
>> To explain the context, we wanted to have an official group on Linkedin
>> to publish news about the project as we do through the @cassandra handler
>> on Twitter. We wanted a group that was vendor independent and focused on
>> Apache Cassandra and its ecosystem.
>> To be fully transparent, we had no idea that you were in charge of the
>> Apache Cassandra Users group as it appears managed by Lynn Bender and
>> Joanna Kapel. The group also appears to promote different vendors which is
>> something that we wanted to avoid.
>> Having to post things under Lynn's name was also an issue for us as we
>> wished the merits to go to the right persons.
>>
>> Now, I am sure that we can work out some solution that will benefit the
>> community. :-)
>>
>> Le mer. 9 mars 2022 à 15:56, Patrick McFadin  a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> I feel like this needs to be a discussion held on the public mailing
>>> list. I have been running the Apache Cassandra Users group on LinkedIn for
>>> years after taking it over from Lynn Bender.
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/groups/3803052/
>>>
>>> We have over 7500 members and had its ups and downs but it's been pretty
>>> consistent as a professional resource on LinkedIn. I'm not sure what there
>>> is to gain by creating competing groups. If we need more managers in the
>>> group that's fine but somebody just needed to ask. It's clear that this
>>> discussion happened somewhere else and this was just an announcement.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:41 AM Benjamin Lerer  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>
>>>> We just created a new Apache Cassandra group on LinkedIn (
>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/groups/9159443/).
>>>>
>>>> This group will be managed by our community and will respect vendor
>>>> neutrality.
>>>> Do not hesitate to join and share your experiences or blog posts with
>>>> us :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>

-- 
Melissa Logan (she/her)
Principal, Constantia.io
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mklogan/> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/Melissa_B2B>


Re: New Apache Cassandra Group on LinkedIn

2022-03-09 Thread Patrick McFadin
I'm not sure if they can merge groups but from what I'm reading that
wouldn't work either. What I'm seeing is a desire to not "promote vendors"
which I believe is working against the project's self-interest. LinkedIn is
the perfect place to do it. The allergic reaction the project has taken for
vendors has made our ecosystem look weak when that's not really the case.
Temporal, Prometheus, Feast, Orkes (to just name a few) all have Cassandra
integrations but you would never know that by looking at any official
Cassandra communication because ecosystem == vendor == bad. The result is
that Cassandra looks like an island that will never help this project grow.

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 9:20 AM Jeremy Hanna 
wrote:

> Is it possible to ask someone at linkedin to merge the groups together so
> that it's managed by the PMC but with the explicit permission of the people
> running the other group?  In the past, I know that Twitter does things like
> that in terms of handles and followers.  Is that a desirable outcome?
>
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 11:00 AM, Benjamin Lerer  wrote:
>
> Hi Patrick,
> Thanks for reaching out. Effectively the discussion has happened between
> the PMC members.
> To explain the context, we wanted to have an official group on Linkedin to
> publish news about the project as we do through the @cassandra handler on
> Twitter. We wanted a group that was vendor independent and focused on
> Apache Cassandra and its ecosystem.
> To be fully transparent, we had no idea that you were in charge of the
> Apache Cassandra Users group as it appears managed by Lynn Bender and
> Joanna Kapel. The group also appears to promote different vendors which is
> something that we wanted to avoid.
> Having to post things under Lynn's name was also an issue for us as we
> wished the merits to go to the right persons.
>
> Now, I am sure that we can work out some solution that will benefit the
> community. :-)
>
> Le mer. 9 mars 2022 à 15:56, Patrick McFadin  a
> écrit :
>
>> I feel like this needs to be a discussion held on the public mailing
>> list. I have been running the Apache Cassandra Users group on LinkedIn for
>> years after taking it over from Lynn Bender.
>> https://www.linkedin.com/groups/3803052/
>>
>> We have over 7500 members and had its ups and downs but it's been pretty
>> consistent as a professional resource on LinkedIn. I'm not sure what there
>> is to gain by creating competing groups. If we need more managers in the
>> group that's fine but somebody just needed to ask. It's clear that this
>> discussion happened somewhere else and this was just an announcement.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:41 AM Benjamin Lerer  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> We just created a new Apache Cassandra group on LinkedIn (
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/groups/9159443/).
>>>
>>> This group will be managed by our community and will respect vendor
>>> neutrality.
>>> Do not hesitate to join and share your experiences or blog posts with us
>>> :-)
>>>
>>
>


Re: New Apache Cassandra Group on LinkedIn

2022-03-09 Thread Jeremy Hanna
Is it possible to ask someone at linkedin to merge the groups together so that 
it's managed by the PMC but with the explicit permission of the people running 
the other group?  In the past, I know that Twitter does things like that in 
terms of handles and followers.  Is that a desirable outcome?

> On Mar 9, 2022, at 11:00 AM, Benjamin Lerer  wrote:
> 
> Hi Patrick,
> Thanks for reaching out. Effectively the discussion has happened between the 
> PMC members.
> To explain the context, we wanted to have an official group on Linkedin to 
> publish news about the project as we do through the @cassandra handler on 
> Twitter. We wanted a group that was vendor independent and focused on Apache 
> Cassandra and its ecosystem.
> To be fully transparent, we had no idea that you were in charge of the Apache 
> Cassandra Users group as it appears managed by Lynn Bender and Joanna Kapel. 
> The group also appears to promote different vendors which is something that 
> we wanted to avoid.
> Having to post things under Lynn's name was also an issue for us as we wished 
> the merits to go to the right persons.
> 
> Now, I am sure that we can work out some solution that will benefit the 
> community. :-)
> 
> Le mer. 9 mars 2022 à 15:56, Patrick McFadin  <mailto:pmcfa...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
> I feel like this needs to be a discussion held on the public mailing list. I 
> have been running the Apache Cassandra Users group on LinkedIn for years 
> after taking it over from Lynn Bender. 
> https://www.linkedin.com/groups/3803052/ 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/groups/3803052/>
> 
> We have over 7500 members and had its ups and downs but it's been pretty 
> consistent as a professional resource on LinkedIn. I'm not sure what there is 
> to gain by creating competing groups. If we need more managers in the group 
> that's fine but somebody just needed to ask. It's clear that this discussion 
> happened somewhere else and this was just an announcement. 
> 
> Patrick
> 
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:41 AM Benjamin Lerer  <mailto:ble...@apache.org>> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> 
> We just created a new Apache Cassandra group on LinkedIn 
> (https://www.linkedin.com/groups/9159443/ 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/groups/9159443/>).
> 
> This group will be managed by our community and will respect vendor 
> neutrality.
> Do not hesitate to join and share your experiences or blog posts with us :-)



Re: New Apache Cassandra Group on LinkedIn

2022-03-09 Thread Benjamin Lerer
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for reaching out. Effectively the discussion has happened between
the PMC members.
To explain the context, we wanted to have an official group on Linkedin to
publish news about the project as we do through the @cassandra handler on
Twitter. We wanted a group that was vendor independent and focused on
Apache Cassandra and its ecosystem.
To be fully transparent, we had no idea that you were in charge of the
Apache Cassandra Users group as it appears managed by Lynn Bender and
Joanna Kapel. The group also appears to promote different vendors which is
something that we wanted to avoid.
Having to post things under Lynn's name was also an issue for us as we
wished the merits to go to the right persons.

Now, I am sure that we can work out some solution that will benefit the
community. :-)

Le mer. 9 mars 2022 à 15:56, Patrick McFadin  a écrit :

> I feel like this needs to be a discussion held on the public mailing list.
> I have been running the Apache Cassandra Users group on LinkedIn for years
> after taking it over from Lynn Bender.
> https://www.linkedin.com/groups/3803052/
>
> We have over 7500 members and had its ups and downs but it's been pretty
> consistent as a professional resource on LinkedIn. I'm not sure what there
> is to gain by creating competing groups. If we need more managers in the
> group that's fine but somebody just needed to ask. It's clear that this
> discussion happened somewhere else and this was just an announcement.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:41 AM Benjamin Lerer  wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> We just created a new Apache Cassandra group on LinkedIn (
>> https://www.linkedin.com/groups/9159443/).
>>
>> This group will be managed by our community and will respect vendor
>> neutrality.
>> Do not hesitate to join and share your experiences or blog posts with us
>> :-)
>>
>


Re: New Apache Cassandra Group on LinkedIn

2022-03-09 Thread Patrick McFadin
I feel like this needs to be a discussion held on the public mailing list.
I have been running the Apache Cassandra Users group on LinkedIn for years
after taking it over from Lynn Bender.
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/3803052/

We have over 7500 members and had its ups and downs but it's been pretty
consistent as a professional resource on LinkedIn. I'm not sure what there
is to gain by creating competing groups. If we need more managers in the
group that's fine but somebody just needed to ask. It's clear that this
discussion happened somewhere else and this was just an announcement.

Patrick

On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:41 AM Benjamin Lerer  wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> We just created a new Apache Cassandra group on LinkedIn (
> https://www.linkedin.com/groups/9159443/).
>
> This group will be managed by our community and will respect vendor
> neutrality.
> Do not hesitate to join and share your experiences or blog posts with us
> :-)
>


New Apache Cassandra Group on LinkedIn

2022-03-03 Thread Benjamin Lerer
Hi everybody,

We just created a new Apache Cassandra group on LinkedIn (
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/9159443/).

This group will be managed by our community and will respect vendor
neutrality.
Do not hesitate to join and share your experiences or blog posts with us :-)