Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a branch for 4.0.0

2021-06-03 Thread Brandon Williams
This is completed now, thanks to all those who helped!

The merge order for release blockers is:

cassandra-3.0->cassandra-3.11->cassandra-4.0.0->cassandra-4.0->trunk

For anything non-critical, you skip 4.0.0, but explicitly:

cassandra-3.0->cassandra-3.11->cassandra-4.0->trunk

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 11:32 AM Brandon Williams  wrote:
>
> I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16709 for
> the 4.0.0 branch
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 11:06 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
>  wrote:
> >
> > +1, thank you Brandon
> >
> > @Jeff - there is the Jira board Cassandra 4.0GAScope
> > It might need some revision though. Any help with flaky tests is also
> > appreciated if anyone has cycles. Thank you all, let’s do it :-)
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 11:45, Jeff Jirsa  wrote:
> >
> > > Given we're past the RC1, I think it's time.
> > >
> > > Also, probably a silly question, but where's the list of issues reported 
> > > in
> > > the release candidate that need to be fixed before the GA?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:36 AM Brandon Williams  wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > In order to more safely expedite 4.0's first release, I would like to
> > > > propose minimizing the surface area for regressions by creating a 4.0.0
> > > > branch, as we have done in the past for initial releases.  Only critical
> > > > bugfixes would go in this branch, essentially removing it from the merge
> > > > order otherwise.  This should allow everyone to scratch the itches they
> > > > choose without introducing any unnecessary risk to the impending 4.0.0
> > > > release. Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > Brandon
> > > >
> > >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a branch for 4.0.0

2021-06-03 Thread Brandon Williams
I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16709 for
the 4.0.0 branch

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 11:06 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova
 wrote:
>
> +1, thank you Brandon
>
> @Jeff - there is the Jira board Cassandra 4.0GAScope
> It might need some revision though. Any help with flaky tests is also
> appreciated if anyone has cycles. Thank you all, let’s do it :-)
>
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 11:45, Jeff Jirsa  wrote:
>
> > Given we're past the RC1, I think it's time.
> >
> > Also, probably a silly question, but where's the list of issues reported in
> > the release candidate that need to be fixed before the GA?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:36 AM Brandon Williams  wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > In order to more safely expedite 4.0's first release, I would like to
> > > propose minimizing the surface area for regressions by creating a 4.0.0
> > > branch, as we have done in the past for initial releases.  Only critical
> > > bugfixes would go in this branch, essentially removing it from the merge
> > > order otherwise.  This should allow everyone to scratch the itches they
> > > choose without introducing any unnecessary risk to the impending 4.0.0
> > > release. Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Brandon
> > >
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a branch for 4.0.0

2021-06-03 Thread Ekaterina Dimitrova
+1, thank you Brandon

@Jeff - there is the Jira board Cassandra 4.0GAScope
It might need some revision though. Any help with flaky tests is also
appreciated if anyone has cycles. Thank you all, let’s do it :-)

On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 11:45, Jeff Jirsa  wrote:

> Given we're past the RC1, I think it's time.
>
> Also, probably a silly question, but where's the list of issues reported in
> the release candidate that need to be fixed before the GA?
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:36 AM Brandon Williams  wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > In order to more safely expedite 4.0's first release, I would like to
> > propose minimizing the surface area for regressions by creating a 4.0.0
> > branch, as we have done in the past for initial releases.  Only critical
> > bugfixes would go in this branch, essentially removing it from the merge
> > order otherwise.  This should allow everyone to scratch the itches they
> > choose without introducing any unnecessary risk to the impending 4.0.0
> > release. Thoughts?
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Brandon
> >
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a branch for 4.0.0

2021-06-03 Thread Benjamin Lerer
The 4.0GA board is ->
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=355=1661



Le jeu. 3 juin 2021 à 17:45, Jeff Jirsa  a écrit :

> Given we're past the RC1, I think it's time.
>
> Also, probably a silly question, but where's the list of issues reported in
> the release candidate that need to be fixed before the GA?
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:36 AM Brandon Williams  wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > In order to more safely expedite 4.0's first release, I would like to
> > propose minimizing the surface area for regressions by creating a 4.0.0
> > branch, as we have done in the past for initial releases.  Only critical
> > bugfixes would go in this branch, essentially removing it from the merge
> > order otherwise.  This should allow everyone to scratch the itches they
> > choose without introducing any unnecessary risk to the impending 4.0.0
> > release. Thoughts?
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Brandon
> >
>


Re: [DISCUSS] Creating a branch for 4.0.0

2021-06-03 Thread Jeff Jirsa
Given we're past the RC1, I think it's time.

Also, probably a silly question, but where's the list of issues reported in
the release candidate that need to be fixed before the GA?


On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:36 AM Brandon Williams  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> In order to more safely expedite 4.0's first release, I would like to
> propose minimizing the surface area for regressions by creating a 4.0.0
> branch, as we have done in the past for initial releases.  Only critical
> bugfixes would go in this branch, essentially removing it from the merge
> order otherwise.  This should allow everyone to scratch the itches they
> choose without introducing any unnecessary risk to the impending 4.0.0
> release. Thoughts?
>
> Kind Regards,
> Brandon
>