Re: Review Request 15932: Add support for Primary Storage on Gluster using the libvirt backend
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15932/ --- (Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 9:24 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes --- Rebased to recent master (4.4) and addressed all (?) review comments. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The support for Gluster as Primary Storage is mostly based on the implementation for NFS. Like NFS, libvirt can address a Gluster environment through the 'netfs' pool-type. Diffs (updated) - api/src/com/cloud/storage/Storage.java ff83dfc plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java d63b643 plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtStoragePoolDef.java dbe5d4b plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtStoragePoolXMLParser.java a6186f6 plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtVMDef.java ff75d61 plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStorageProcessor.java 8cdecd8 plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/LibvirtStorageAdaptor.java a5f33eb plugins/storage/volume/default/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/lifecycle/CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreLifeCycleImpl.java b90d5fc Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15932/diff/ Testing --- See http://blog.nixpanic.net/2013/12/using-gluster-as-primary-storage-in.html Thanks, Niels de Vos
Re: Review Request 15933: Add Gluster to the list of protocols in the Management Server
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15933/ --- (Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 9:26 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes --- Rebased to recent master (4.4). Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Gluster can now be used for Primary Storage just like NFS. This change adds the Gluster protocol to the Management Server: Infrastructure - Primary Storage - Add Primary Storage And also add the option to create Primary Storage on Gluster when following the 'Add Zone' wizard from: Infrastructure - Zones - Add Zone Diffs (updated) - client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties bd4a27d ui/dictionary.jsp 7ccb466 ui/scripts/sharedFunctions.js 2a15967 ui/scripts/system.js 8159124 ui/scripts/zoneWizard.js fd5705b Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15933/diff/ Testing --- Some screenshots and verification: - http://blog.nixpanic.net/2013/12/using-gluster-as-primary-storage-in.html Thanks, Niels de Vos
Re: Review Request 15933: Add Gluster to the list of protocols in the Management Server
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15933/ --- (Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 9:27 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Gluster can now be used for Primary Storage just like NFS. This change adds the Gluster protocol to the Management Server: Infrastructure - Primary Storage - Add Primary Storage And also add the option to create Primary Storage on Gluster when following the 'Add Zone' wizard from: Infrastructure - Zones - Add Zone Diffs - client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties bd4a27d ui/dictionary.jsp 7ccb466 ui/scripts/sharedFunctions.js 2a15967 ui/scripts/system.js 8159124 ui/scripts/zoneWizard.js fd5705b Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15933/diff/ Testing --- Some screenshots and verification: - http://blog.nixpanic.net/2013/12/using-gluster-as-primary-storage-in.html Thanks, Niels de Vos
Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
Hello, Can someone grant me privileges to assign the jira item CLOUDSTACK-3272 to myself. Thanks, Sonal -- Forwarded message -- From: Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com Date: Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:20 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272) To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com Sonal, There may be mix up on the problem statement of the bug 3272. Sorry I did not elaborate enough in the bug. So there are multiple event types that are generated by CS, action events, usage events, resource state change events and alerts. Current problem is all the events gets published on the event bus when event bus is enabled. Intent of the bug is to introduce global setting config parameters to specify which category of events to be published or not be published on the event bus. For e.g if global config param says to publish only usage events, then only usage events should be published on the event bus. If your intent is to create generic mechanism to add meta-data to events that event bus can interpret and do specific action/configuration then it might make sense to open a different bug and elaborate what you want to address. Thanks, Murali On 16/12/13 1:11 PM, Sonal Ojha sonal.o...@sungard.com wrote: As per the problem statement the config parameters would be the deciding factor for the behavior of the events on the event bus. A subscriber would never decide the behavior , instead the publisher of the event would add config parameters to the events. On basis of these parameters the wrapper over the queue broker could decide the actions to be performed on the events. For example, the publisher of vm start event added a configuration parameter expiry to the event. On basis of this parameter the wrapper over the message queue broker would decide when should the vm start event be expired / deleted from the queue. The subscriber of the event will be able to read / fetch the event until its expired. There could be more than one config parameters attached to an event and so the proposal is to add all these config parameters into a Map instead of having only one config parameter added as a variable to the EventCategory class. On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Forgive me for my ignorance , why can't this be done by the client that is receiving the events? Note that multiple clients can subscribe to the event bus: this requirement is specific to one client? From: Sonal Ojha sonal.o...@sungard.com Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 11:36 PM To: Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272) One of the use case be to delete only vm power on/off events from the event queue, other be to persist all the update events on virtual machines on the queue. The map of configuration parameters would be helpful to decide such behaviors. On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Some more description of the use cases would be helpful. What is the pain point it is addressing? On 12/11/13 3:26 AM, Sonal Ojha sonal.o...@sungard.com wrote: Hello, As per the description in the bug I would like to propose to introduce a new instance variable configParameters of type HashMap to the EventCategory class.Currently, it could store one config parameter publish.action.events(key as String) and True (value as Boolean) but later it could add more config parameters to change the behavior of events. Thoughts / suggestions ? -- Thanks and Regards, *Sonal Ojha* EURO Senior Engineer Product Development EURO SunGard IT Availability Mobile +91-9922412645 EURO E-Mail: sonal.o...@sungard.com -- Thanks and Regards, *Sonal Ojha* * Senior Engineer Product Development * SunGard IT Availability Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.o...@sungard.com -- Thanks and Regards, *Sonal Ojha* * Senior Engineer Product Development * SunGard IT Availability Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.o...@sungard.com -- Thanks and Regards, *Sonal Ojha* * Senior Engineer Product Development * SunGard IT Availability Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.o...@sungard.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be. @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix was done in a hurry and communicated poorly. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
Thanks Sheng, Unfortunately there is no Enable VPN option on the VPC Source NAT IP like there is on a normal Network Source NAT IP. Here is a link to the screen shot of the UI https://www.flickr.com/photos/115889886@N08/12631278043/ The vpc_id fields which according to the spec are supposed to have been added to the DB remote_access_vpn table are also missing. Attempting to create the VPN via the API also fails, implying its more than a UI issue, the code appears not to be included the RC. If this is supposed to be in the 4.3.0 release, as a new sixth round RC has just been spun I will test again, if still missing guess I'll vote -0 as it's not a blocker, just missing when it should be there. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: 18 February 2014 22:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) Hi Geoff, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Remote+Access+VPN+for+VPC I just checked the latest 4.3 code and VPN for VPC works well. The steps are(as refered in the spec): 1. User click VPC's IP list 2. User choose VPC's source nat IP 3. User click Enable VPN 4. Others are the same as remote access VPN of isolated network --Sheng On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: All, I was trying to test the new Remote Access VPN to VPC feature which is apparently included in 4.3.0 but I cannot get it to work from the UI (no buttons) or from the API. Are there some new API commands I should be using, as I believe I have the latest 4.3.0 API calls, and there are no specific VPC Remote VPN APIs listed. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 February 2014 12:26 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) -1 (binding) tested vlan based standalone network tested vlan based bridged network tested vpc with vlan based gateway and - tier network tested vpc with nicira based gateway and - tier network All tests included creation of an instance and pinging the router from the instance. All tests passed in the end but a note on the side is that all vlan based tests didn't pass the ping test first time around. interface were created with no ip and after manually assigning ips, the routers still couldn't be pinged, For no obvious reason they passed after destroying the network and recreating it. This worries me but will lead to a +0 as such. I can not yet point to a bug that causes this. My -1 is due to another issue: a fix submitted to the 4.3-forward branch wasn't cherry-picked to this rc. See my earlier mail [1]. I had assumed it would be included due to [2]. [1] http://markmail.org/message/sujzvfefxsohurt5 [2] http://markmail.org/message/n2q46ovlkvgyunyk kind regards, Daan Hoogland On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote: Thanks Geoff, I did not have a setup to verify again, I just brought one up and that failure was a false alarm. Dedicate vlan range test passed in the next run. So, it is a +1 from my side Sent from HTC - Reply message - From: Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 5:11 AM I've update the Jira ticket with the following comment: I have tried to reproduce this manually and have not been able to re-create the issue. Added a new Guest VLAN Range in addition to the existing range, then dedicated to a normal user account, all successful, and all on the latest RC (fifth round). Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com] Sent: 17 February 2014 22:29 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) There is a new test failure in this RC which is a regression from previous RC. Created a bug for this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6131 http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa-4.3/job/test-smoke -m atrix -4.3/1194/suite=test_guest_vlan_range/testReport/integration.smoke.t es t_gue st_vlan_range/TestDedicateGuestVlanRange/test_dedicateGuestVlanRange / On KVM(CentOS 6.3)/Test Run: #1193 4 of the test failures are not valid because snapshots, scaling VM are not supported on KVM Hypervisor and 5 more
Cloudstack jira item privileges
Hello, Can someone grant me privileges to assign the jira item CLOUDSTACK-6035 to myself. Thanks and Regards, Namita
Re: Review Request 17702: CLOUDSTACK-2232: Adding automation test cases for Persistent Networks feature
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/ --- (Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 10:32 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Santhosh Edukulla. Changes --- Rebased against latest master. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2232 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2232 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Adding automation test cases for Persistent Networks feature. Diffs (updated) - test/integration/component/test_persistent_networks.py f61ccaa tools/marvin/marvin/config/config.cfg 7840b7c tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/base.py 1d8229d tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/common.py 5b56c73 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/diff/ Testing (updated) --- Adding log: test_assign_vm_different_account_VR_LB-NS (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestAssignVirtualMachine) ... skipped 'skip' test_assign_vm_different_account_VR_RVR (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestAssignVirtualMachine) ... skipped 'skip' test_assign_vm_different_account_VR_VR (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestAssignVirtualMachine) ... skipped 'skip' test_change_persistent_network_to_non_persistent (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_delete_account (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_list_persistent_network_offering (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_network_state_after_destroying_vms (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_persistent_network_offering_with_VPCVR_services (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_persistent_network_with_RVR (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_pf_nat_rule_persistent_network_LB-Netscaler (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_pf_nat_rule_persistent_network_LB-VR (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_shared_network_offering_with_persistent (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_upgrade_network_NS_to_persistent_NS (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_upgrade_network_VR_to_PersistentRVR (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_upgrade_to_persistent_services_VR_LB-NS (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_upgrade_to_persistent_services_VR_LB-VR (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_vm_deployment_persistent_and_non_persistent_networks (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_vm_deployment_two_persistent_networks (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestPersistentNetworks) ... skipped 'skip' test_account_operations_disabled (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestProjectAccountOperations) ... ok test_account_operations_locked (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestProjectAccountOperations) ... ok test_project_operations (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestProjectAccountOperations) ... skipped 'Skip' test_cleanup_persistent_network_false (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestRestartPersistentNetwork) ... skipped 'skip' test_cleanup_persistent_network_lb_netscaler_false (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestRestartPersistentNetwork) ... skipped 'skip' test_cleanup_persistent_network_lb_netscaler_true (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestRestartPersistentNetwork) ... skipped 'skip' test_cleanup_persistent_network_true (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestRestartPersistentNetwork) ... skipped 'skip' test_vpc_delete_account (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestVPCNetworkOperations) ... skipped 'skip' test_vpc_force_delete_domain (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestVPCNetworkOperations) ... skipped 'skip' test_vpc_network_life_cycle_delete (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestVPCNetworkOperations) ... skipped 'skip' test_vpc_network_life_cycle_restart (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestVPCNetworkOperations) ... skipped 'skip' test_vpc_private_gateway_static_route (test_persistent_networks_fixed.TestVPCNetworkOperations) ... skipped 'skip' -- Ran 30 tests in 639.244s OK (skipped=28) Thanks, Ashutosh Kelkar
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
-1 (binding) I’m trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can’t find the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations and a wrong version number for the systemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can’t upgrade from a previous release to the new release. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be. @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix was done in a hurry and communicated poorly. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan
Re: Review Request 17116: Phase1 Marvin Changes.Fix-for-CLOUDSTACK-5674, 5498, 5500( Fixed Few issues in patch 17113 )
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17116/#review34857 --- Commit 47c5b638817784c68c77e4f2dcbfb9ae5d3d6ae9 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/marvin from Girish Shilamkar [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=47c5b63 ] CLOUDSTACK-5674: Fixed all BVTs and some marvin functions - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Jan. 22, 2014, 10:54 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17116/ --- (Updated Jan. 22, 2014, 10:54 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Fixed few issues including pep8 in previous submitted patch ( 17113 ). Tested Deploying a DC. Diffs - setup/dev/advanced.cfg 23981f0 setup/dev/basic.cfg 3e39d6d test/integration/component/test_add_remove_network.py 8ec2971 test/integration/component/test_affinity_groups.py 7e4fabe test/integration/component/test_cpu_domain_limits.py c427e4f test/integration/component/test_cpu_limits.py bdf2869 test/integration/component/test_cpu_max_limits.py 317df16 test/integration/component/test_cpu_project_limits.py a8a1b3c test/integration/component/test_memory_limits.py 7921e4b test/integration/component/test_mm_domain_limits.py 68660c1 test/integration/component/test_mm_max_limits.py e10c119 test/integration/component/test_mm_project_limits.py c314011 test/integration/component/test_portable_ip.py b09daf9 test/integration/component/test_vpc.py 1af8d81 test/integration/component/test_vpn_users.py 02dd026 test/integration/smoke/test_affinity_groups.py c96a580 test/integration/smoke/test_deploy_vm.py 425aeb7 test/integration/smoke/test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py e3788cf tools/marvin/marvin/asyncJobMgr.py ee0e891 tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py fb03e3b tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackException.py 623 tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackTestClient.py 4ac510b tools/marvin/marvin/codegenerator.py e0f056f tools/marvin/marvin/codes.py 74fb05d tools/marvin/marvin/config/test_data.cfg PRE-CREATION tools/marvin/marvin/configGenerator.py 0d79e8e tools/marvin/marvin/dbConnection.py 99014ab tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py c4f6e1e tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/common.py 550de1a tools/marvin/marvin/jsonHelper.py ae40b8d tools/marvin/marvin/marvinInit.py f722058 tools/marvin/marvin/marvinLog.py 76de185 tools/marvin/marvin/marvinPlugin.py df7d7a3 tools/marvin/marvin/tcExecuteEngine.py f959e7e Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17116/diff/ Testing --- File Attachments New Patch File https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/01/22/1759bdd3-40f9-4462-81b5-e44df20774dc__new_diff.patch Thanks, Santhosh Edukulla
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
On 19.02.2014 10:55, Hugo Trippaers wrote: -1 (binding) I’m trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can’t find the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations and a wrong version number for the systemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can’t upgrade from a previous release to the new release. I successfully upgraded from 4.2.1 (CentOS/KVM) to 4.3, but before that I had to register the sysvm template from http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm/ and all went smoothly. HTH -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-rn pull request: Fixed System VM Templates
GitHub user geoffhigginbottom opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/2 Fixed System VM Templates Fixed the download paths for the System VM Templates as most were still pointing at the 4.2 versions. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/geoffhigginbottom/cloudstack-docs-rn master Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/2.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #2 commit 7915c888ac312204f5790aabf3d0a1e5a5996711 Author: geoffhigginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com Date: 2014-02-19T11:53:26Z Fixed System VM Templates Fixed the download paths for the System VM Templates as most were still pointing at the 4.2 versions. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. To do so, please top-post your response. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Hugo, I've just update the release docs and submitted a Pull Request with the changes. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) -1 (binding) I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations and a wrong version number for the systemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can't upgrade from a previous release to the new release. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be. @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix was done in a hurry and communicated poorly. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+p rocedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Geoff, Just commit the changes, you have the commit bit. ;-) Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 12:56, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hugo, I've just update the release docs and submitted a Pull Request with the changes. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) -1 (binding) I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations and a wrong version number for the systemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can't upgrade from a previous release to the new release. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be. @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix was done in a hurry and communicated poorly. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+p rocedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue
Re: Review Request 15932: Add support for Primary Storage on Gluster using the libvirt backend
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15932/#review34859 --- Ship it! It seems good to me. Applies cleanly to master and builds just fine. Code-wise it's simple but effective, should allow us to support Gluster. - Wido den Hollander On Feb. 19, 2014, 8:24 a.m., Niels de Vos wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15932/ --- (Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 8:24 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The support for Gluster as Primary Storage is mostly based on the implementation for NFS. Like NFS, libvirt can address a Gluster environment through the 'netfs' pool-type. Diffs - api/src/com/cloud/storage/Storage.java ff83dfc plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java d63b643 plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtStoragePoolDef.java dbe5d4b plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtStoragePoolXMLParser.java a6186f6 plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtVMDef.java ff75d61 plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStorageProcessor.java 8cdecd8 plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/LibvirtStorageAdaptor.java a5f33eb plugins/storage/volume/default/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/lifecycle/CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreLifeCycleImpl.java b90d5fc Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15932/diff/ Testing --- See http://blog.nixpanic.net/2013/12/using-gluster-as-primary-storage-in.html Thanks, Niels de Vos
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Just checked the new systemvms. The build date Geoff put in the file is 2014-01-14, but the last changes to the systemvms have been made on jan 2014-01-16. So this is not the build that belongs to the current release artifact that we are testing, that systemvm should have the problems as described in ticket CLOUDSTACK-5883. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 14:03, Hugo Trippaers trip...@gmail.com wrote: Geoff, Just commit the changes, you have the commit bit. ;-) Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 12:56, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hugo, I've just update the release docs and submitted a Pull Request with the changes. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) -1 (binding) I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations and a wrong version number for the systemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can't upgrade from a previous release to the new release. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be. @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix was done in a hurry and communicated poorly. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+p rocedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
Re: Cloudstack jira item privileges
Done; Enjoy. --David On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Namita Chaudhari namita.chaudh...@sungard.com wrote: Hello, Can someone grant me privileges to assign the jira item CLOUDSTACK-6035 to myself. Thanks and Regards, Namita
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Hugo, Is there an easy way to track the latest version of the system vm template builds as I now appear to be slightly out of date. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: 19 February 2014 14:47 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) Just checked the new systemvms. The build date Geoff put in the file is 2014-01-14, but the last changes to the systemvms have been made on jan 2014-01-16. So this is not the build that belongs to the current release artifact that we are testing, that systemvm should have the problems as described in ticket CLOUDSTACK-5883. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 14:03, Hugo Trippaers trip...@gmail.com wrote: Geoff, Just commit the changes, you have the commit bit. ;-) Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 12:56, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hugo, I've just update the release docs and submitted a Pull Request with the changes. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) -1 (binding) I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations and a wrong version number for the systemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can't upgrade from a previous release to the new release. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be. @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix was done in a hurry and communicated poorly. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog ;h =refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test +p rocedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led,
Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Sonal Ojha sonal.o...@sungard.com wrote: Sonal You should have the rights now -- Daan
Re: cidrs in acls
Kishan, Can you have a look at the branch acl-item-cidrs. I made some code to handle the cidrs from a separate table. I hardly think this can be enough and would like to create a checklist on what I need to do next. (item one is use the new transaction model;) thanks, Daan On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: That was what I thought as well. What was the retionale to join them into one field? On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Kishan Kavala kishan.kav...@citrix.com wrote: Daan, Similar to firewall_rules_cidrs, separate table can be used to store acl cidrs. Maybe in network_acl_item_cidrs. Regards, kishan -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 17 January 2014 1:05 AM To: Kishan Kavala Cc: dev Subject: cidrs in acls H Kishan, I see you implemented CLOUDSTACK-763. it merges a lot of cidrs into one field. The api doesn't check the field length. I enlarged the field in the create table statement to 2048 for the 4.3 branch. Can you help me think about a more solid solution, please. It seems to me those cidrs shouldn't be joint into one field. regards, Daan -- Daan
Re: Cloudstack jira item privileges
Thanks David.. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:18 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Done; Enjoy. --David On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Namita Chaudhari namita.chaudh...@sungard.com wrote: Hello, Can someone grant me privileges to assign the jira item CLOUDSTACK-6035 to myself. Thanks and Regards, Namita -- *Namita Chaudhari* ● SunGard Availability Services, India ● Mobile: +91 9762922138 ● Email: namita.chaudh...@sungard.com 8 Times Winner – BC Service Provider of the Year – 2011, 2010, 2009, 2006, 2005, 2002, 2000, 1999; Finalist – 2008, 2007, 2004, 2001 ● Excellence in Infrastructure Management – 2010 ● Outstanding Excellence in Business Continuity – 2008 ● Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Service) – 2013 BCI Global Awards ● Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Product) – 2013 BCI India Awards *[image: AS_yt]* http://www.youtube.com/user/SunGardAS*[image: AS_twitter]* https://twitter.com/SunGardASIN*[image: AS_in]*http://www.linkedin.com/company/sungardasin*[image: AS_gplus]* https://plus.google.com/102459878242108588663/*[image: AS_fb]*https://www.facebook.com/sungardas.in*[image: AS_ss]* http://www.slideshare.net/SunGardASIN/documents
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Geoff, The latest build is always on the jenkins server, http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm64/ I think Edison does the uploads of the images to cloud.com, i don’t have access to that site. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 12:56, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hugo, I've just update the release docs and submitted a Pull Request with the changes. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) -1 (binding) I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations and a wrong version number for the systemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can't upgrade from a previous release to the new release. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be. @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix was done in a hurry and communicated poorly. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h =refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+p rocedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
So looks like we should all be testing this latest RC with the system VM templates dated 2014-02-18 then? Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: 19 February 2014 15:08 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) Geoff, The latest build is always on the jenkins server, http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm64/ I think Edison does the uploads of the images to cloud.com, i don't have access to that site. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 12:56, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hugo, I've just update the release docs and submitted a Pull Request with the changes. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) -1 (binding) I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations and a wrong version number for the systemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can't upgrade from a previous release to the new release. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be. @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix was done in a hurry and communicated poorly. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog; h =refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+ p rocedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
Re: Cloudstack jira item privileges
Hello David, I am still not able to assign the jira to myself. Thanks and Regards, Namita On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Namita Chaudhari namita.chaudh...@sungard.com wrote: Thanks David.. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:18 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Done; Enjoy. --David On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Namita Chaudhari namita.chaudh...@sungard.com wrote: Hello, Can someone grant me privileges to assign the jira item CLOUDSTACK-6035 to myself. Thanks and Regards, Namita -- *Namita Chaudhari* ● SunGard Availability Services, India ● Mobile: +91 9762922138 ● Email: namita.chaudh...@sungard.com 8 Times Winner – BC Service Provider of the Year – 2011, 2010, 2009, 2006, 2005, 2002, 2000, 1999; Finalist – 2008, 2007, 2004, 2001 ● Excellence in Infrastructure Management – 2010 ● Outstanding Excellence in Business Continuity – 2008 ● Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Service) – 2013 BCI Global Awards ● Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Product) – 2013 BCI India Awards *[image: AS_yt]* http://www.youtube.com/user/SunGardAS*[image: AS_twitter]* https://twitter.com/SunGardASIN*[image: AS_in]*http://www.linkedin.com/company/sungardasin*[image: AS_gplus]* https://plus.google.com/102459878242108588663/*[image: AS_fb]* https://www.facebook.com/sungardas.in*[image: AS_ss]*http://www.slideshare.net/SunGardASIN/documents -- *Namita Chaudhari* ● SunGard Availability Services, India ● Mobile: +91 9762922138 ● Email: namita.chaudh...@sungard.com 8 Times Winner – BC Service Provider of the Year – 2011, 2010, 2009, 2006, 2005, 2002, 2000, 1999; Finalist – 2008, 2007, 2004, 2001 ● Excellence in Infrastructure Management – 2010 ● Outstanding Excellence in Business Continuity – 2008 ● Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Service) – 2013 BCI Global Awards ● Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Product) – 2013 BCI India Awards *[image: AS_yt]* http://www.youtube.com/user/SunGardAS*[image: AS_twitter]* https://twitter.com/SunGardASIN*[image: AS_in]*http://www.linkedin.com/company/sungardasin*[image: AS_gplus]* https://plus.google.com/102459878242108588663/*[image: AS_fb]*https://www.facebook.com/sungardas.in*[image: AS_ss]* http://www.slideshare.net/SunGardASIN/documents
OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0
Hi Tuna, Can you please clarify what is the status of the functionality described below in relation to 4.3 release: http://cloudstack.readthedocs.org/en/latest/networking/ovs-plugin.html I am testing the last 4.3 release candidate at the moment and cannot see OVS under Network Service Providers. Are these changes going to make it into 4.3 release or is there nothing changed from 4.2.0 release ? (except the bug preventing GRE to work). Thank you, Florin IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
-Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 6:47 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) Just checked the new systemvms. The build date Geoff put in the file is 2014- 01-14, but the last changes to the systemvms have been made on jan 2014- 01-16. So this is not the build that belongs to the current release artifact that we are testing, that systemvm should have the problems as described in ticket CLOUDSTACK-5883. [Animesh] Hugo you had already fixed that right? No other changes to systemvms are expected. Looks like you kicked off a new build. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 14:03, Hugo Trippaers trip...@gmail.com wrote: Geoff, Just commit the changes, you have the commit bit. ;-) Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 12:56, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hugo, I've just update the release docs and submitted a Pull Request with the changes. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) -1 (binding) I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at http://apache-cloudstack-release- notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations and a wrong version number for the systemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can't upgrade from a previous release to the new release. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be. @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix was done in a hurry and communicated poorly. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog ;h =refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test +p rocedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Hi, GRE is still problematic, I am not able to get it to work with this RC in a setup that I have been using successfully with CS 4.1.1. I have XenServer 6.1.0 hypervisors. I have pod1/cluster1/host1 hosting one VM and pod2/cluster2/host2 hosting the second VM. The VMs are up and running, so is the router VM. On the 2 hosts I can see OVSTunnel194 bridge created. But the tunnel interfaces are not created and the VMs are not able to ping. The fix for CLOUDSTACK-5967 is in there, so no idea what is going on. Anyone else tried this scenario ? Regards, Florin -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 4:25 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
Review Request 18277: CLOUDSTACK-6015: initial check in for selenium based client side automated testing
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18277/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta, Parth Jagirdar, and Sebastien Goasguen. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This is the initial check in. There are several directories: common, browser, cspages, cstests/smoketests, cstests/regressiontests. The browser directory is for browser selection. Currently only firefox is used. The common directory is for those shared modules. I plan to create one module for every page. There will also be parent pages and child pages (for instance, infrastructure page is going to have a lot of child pages). At this time I only have one test: login_logout_test, which has 9 individual tests in it, one successful test, eight failed tests including some SQL injection tests. Still missing are the tests for language options and domain selection. I decide to not use lib directory. It seems to me that lib is a JAVA (or C) thing. So I copied Global_Locators.py to common directory. I'll use Parth's code as much as I can. I'll try to write each test for one purpose only. So login_logout_test is for login page and logout. Obviously every test must have login and logout tests. Diffs - test/selenium/browser/firefox.py PRE-CREATION test/selenium/common/Global_Locators.py PRE-CREATION test/selenium/common/shared.py PRE-CREATION test/selenium/cspages/loginpage.py PRE-CREATION test/selenium/cstests/smoketests/login_logout_test.py PRE-CREATION test/selenium/cstests/smoketests/smokecfg.py PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18277/diff/ Testing --- navigate to directory: test/selenium. (At the moment, all tests must be done from this directory.) # python cstests/smoketests/login_logout_test.py Output: USLT-205731:selenium yichi.lu$ python cstests/smoketests/login_logout_test.py . -- Ran 9 tests in 116.517s OK Thanks, Yichi Lu
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
I see the last db update to systemvm for vmware was done by Sateesh with commit https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=151c2398129f0e8dedb10622061a5736b8abcd24 This is after Hugo's commit to fix CLOUDSTACK-5883 and I am assuming Sateesh had included this fix for his build on 16th. The confusion may be coming from the fact that the template name was marked as 1-14 to I guess match with other templates. Rayees had uploaded the VMware template to cloud.com on 1/16 after Sateesh sent it to him for upload later that evening. Hugo do you still see the issue with template referred in db 'http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-vmware.ova'? Thanks Animesh -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:08 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) Geoff, The latest build is always on the jenkins server, http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm64/ I think Edison does the uploads of the images to cloud.com, i don't have access to that site. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 12:56, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hugo, I've just update the release docs and submitted a Pull Request with the changes. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) -1 (binding) I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at http://apache-cloudstack-release- notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations and a wrong version number for the systemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can't upgrade from a previous release to the new release. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be. @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix was done in a hurry and communicated poorly. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog; h =refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+ p rocedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
-Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 6:47 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) Just checked the new systemvms. The build date Geoff put in the file is 2014- 01-14, but the last changes to the systemvms have been made on jan 2014- 01-16. So this is not the build that belongs to the current release artifact that we are testing, that systemvm should have the problems as described in ticket CLOUDSTACK-5883. Cheers, Hugo [Animesh] Hugo please review my response. Sateesh did update the vmware system templates on 1/16. On 19 feb. 2014, at 14:03, Hugo Trippaers trip...@gmail.com wrote: Geoff, Just commit the changes, you have the commit bit. ;-) Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 12:56, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hugo, I've just update the release docs and submitted a Pull Request with the changes. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) -1 (binding) I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at http://apache-cloudstack-release- notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations and a wrong version number for the systemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can't upgrade from a previous release to the new release. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be. @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix was done in a hurry and communicated poorly. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog ;h =refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test +p rocedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 traininghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroomhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-linehttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led,
[Request] gpu/vGPU support for guest VMs feature patch review request
Hi all, I have been working on the GPU and vGPU support for VMs in CloudStack for quite a few days for which I have also published the functional spec at this location: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/GPU+and+vGPU+support+for+CloudStack+Guest+VMs The feature adds the GPU and vGPU support for guest VMs in CS and deployment of gpu/vGPU enabled VMs are service offering based. Patch for the same can be find here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17889/ Please review the patch and let me know if any changes needed. Also there are two dependent patch for this feature patch i.e. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/ and https://reviews.apache.org/r/17844/ which have XS 6.2 SP1 released java bindings which also supports vGPU functionality. Please let me know if you need any further information. --Sanjay -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 11:51 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Exposing PCIe capabilities to the Cloud Scheduler I'd expect it to be something service-offering based, e.g. if your offering specifies GPU, it auto-allocates from detected GPU elements, if it's 10G nic, it auto allocates from that. Admin would still have to tag the host as being capable, somehow, but it would alleviate the manual registration of every PCI ID for every VF in every agent.properties, for example. One could simply turn on SR-IOV NIC or GPU. On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 1:34 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: ; malini.k.bhand...@intel.com; Dugger, Donald D; yunhong.ji...@intel.com; Meshkin, Omid; Manan Shah; Bob Ball; Hoban, Adrian Subject: Re: Exposing PCIe capabilities to the Cloud Scheduler I think it's interesting, the PCI discovery that was mentioned, it would alleviate the manual agent.properties config that the patch requires. I Curious, if libvirt auto discover a bunch of pci devices on the host, should agent report all of them to user/admin? If not, based on what kind of criteria to filter pci devices? imagine it will be available in the Ubuntu 14.04 release as well, assuming they're targeting current versions. On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Ryousei, The patch sounds good to me, don’t know why it’s not got checked into 4.2 or 4.3. Is it ok for you to rebase to master? After that, I’ll check it into master. From: 高野了成 [mailto:takano-ryou...@aist.go.jp] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 4:08 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: malini.k.bhand...@intel.com; Edison Su; Dugger, Donald D; yunhong.ji...@intel.com; Meshkin, Omid; Manan Shah; Bob Ball; Hoban, Adrian Subject: RE: Exposing PCIe capabilities to the Cloud Scheduler Dear Edison Su and Malini Bhandaru, I am the mentor of Pawit, who has submitted PCI passthrough patch last year. We have been developing this feature for operating our private cloud based on CloudStack 4.2.1. Now our users can deploy and migrate a VM instance with an InfiniBand interface. We hope to improve our patch and merge into CloudStack. Your comments and suggestions are welcome. Best regards, Ryousei Welcome, my dear Intel friends:) Last year, community has contributed code regarding to add PCI passthrough into CloudStack, see the patch: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12098/, but unfortunately, this patch doesn't get checked in, due to lack of support from committer: http://markmail.org/message/ux2ojhxfqwdvz2uc. If you guys want to pick it up, either work from scratch, or based on the original patch, that will be great. -Original Message- From: Bhandaru, Malini K [mailto:malini.k.bhand...@intel.commailto:malini.k.bhandaru@inte l.c om] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 12:48 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Dugger, Donald D; Jiang, Yunhong; Meshkin, Omid; Manan Shah; Bob Ball; Hoban, Adrian Subject: Exposing PCIe capabilities to the Cloud Scheduler Hello CloudStack-ers! PCIe (Peripheral Component Interconnect Express) devices exist for graphics processing, storage, digital signal processing, accelerating encryption/decryption, and more. Further, within a function class, devices can exhibit different capability levels. Exposing such platform hardware capabilities to the cloud scheduler allows Virtual Machines (VMs) to explicitly request them for improved performance and for the cloud vendor the opportunity to offer services at different price points. facilitate differentiated revenur opportunities to the cloud vendor. CloudStack already exposes GPU accelerationhttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/ GP U+and+vGPU+support+for+CloudStack+Guest+Vms. Along
Re: Can't login to webui
Sorry I don't have any useful assistance to provide here, but I just wanted to note that I have had this happen in the past, as well, and solved it by starting over from scratch. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Michael Phillips mphilli7...@hotmail.comwrote: something obviously went horribly wrong so I am starting over From: mphilli7...@hotmail.com To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Can't login to webui Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:23:46 -0600 So I enabled the account via mysql through the command linehowever the logs still say the password does not match when trying to login... err dev guys what could the pw be if not password? From: mphilli7...@hotmail.com To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Can't login to webui Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:05:21 -0600 hah...nice the logs are telling me the admin account is locked\disabled. So how does it become locked on a fresh install? From: mphilli7...@hotmail.com To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Can't login to webui Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:56:39 -0600 Looks like the admin account in the database has a hashed password of 0.180873463098773 From: mphilli7...@hotmail.com To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Can't login to webui Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:50:46 -0600 I have a new install on 4.2.1 on Centos, however I can not login to the UI using the default username\password combo of admin\password. I have checked my 'cloud' database and its has tables etc. I even checked the user table and it looks like there is an admin user... What am I missing?? -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
Hi Geoff, In fact I just tested the latest 4.3 branch before replied to you yesterday, and there is no issue on mine. And it's already pass QA testing. It's really weird. Could you double confirm your version or your setup? The build I got is from: commit adf4dd59270917b1607940d7064748bd438cbbcc Author: Kelven Yang kelv...@gmail.com Date: Thu Feb 13 14:34:06 2014 -0800 CLOUDSTACK-6065: Fix NPE problem caused by the lack of context setup in threads from agent manager thread pool (cherry picked from commit 1283919f02e2c4d2652ca18693b6cf2906b2263d) Signed-off-by: Animesh Chaturvedi anim...@apache.org --Sheng On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Thanks Sheng, Unfortunately there is no Enable VPN option on the VPC Source NAT IP like there is on a normal Network Source NAT IP. Here is a link to the screen shot of the UI https://www.flickr.com/photos/115889886@N08/12631278043/ The vpc_id fields which according to the spec are supposed to have been added to the DB remote_access_vpn table are also missing. Attempting to create the VPN via the API also fails, implying its more than a UI issue, the code appears not to be included the RC. If this is supposed to be in the 4.3.0 release, as a new sixth round RC has just been spun I will test again, if still missing guess I'll vote -0 as it's not a blocker, just missing when it should be there. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: 18 February 2014 22:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) Hi Geoff, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Remote+Access+VPN+for+VPC I just checked the latest 4.3 code and VPN for VPC works well. The steps are(as refered in the spec): 1. User click VPC's IP list 2. User choose VPC's source nat IP 3. User click Enable VPN 4. Others are the same as remote access VPN of isolated network --Sheng On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: All, I was trying to test the new Remote Access VPN to VPC feature which is apparently included in 4.3.0 but I cannot get it to work from the UI (no buttons) or from the API. Are there some new API commands I should be using, as I believe I have the latest 4.3.0 API calls, and there are no specific VPC Remote VPN APIs listed. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 February 2014 12:26 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) -1 (binding) tested vlan based standalone network tested vlan based bridged network tested vpc with vlan based gateway and - tier network tested vpc with nicira based gateway and - tier network All tests included creation of an instance and pinging the router from the instance. All tests passed in the end but a note on the side is that all vlan based tests didn't pass the ping test first time around. interface were created with no ip and after manually assigning ips, the routers still couldn't be pinged, For no obvious reason they passed after destroying the network and recreating it. This worries me but will lead to a +0 as such. I can not yet point to a bug that causes this. My -1 is due to another issue: a fix submitted to the 4.3-forward branch wasn't cherry-picked to this rc. See my earlier mail [1]. I had assumed it would be included due to [2]. [1] http://markmail.org/message/sujzvfefxsohurt5 [2] http://markmail.org/message/n2q46ovlkvgyunyk kind regards, Daan Hoogland On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote: Thanks Geoff, I did not have a setup to verify again, I just brought one up and that failure was a false alarm. Dedicate vlan range test passed in the next run. So, it is a +1 from my side Sent from HTC - Reply message - From: Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 5:11 AM I've update the Jira ticket with the following comment: I have tried to reproduce this manually and have not been able to re-create the issue. Added a new Guest VLAN Range in addition to the existing range, then dedicated to a normal user account, all successful, and all on the latest RC (fifth round). Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Happy to report that the Remote User VPC VPN appears to be included in the latest RC so will fully test tomorrow. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom Sent: 19 February 2014 09:47 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) Thanks Sheng, Unfortunately there is no Enable VPN option on the VPC Source NAT IP like there is on a normal Network Source NAT IP. Here is a link to the screen shot of the UI https://www.flickr.com/photos/115889886@N08/12631278043/ The vpc_id fields which according to the spec are supposed to have been added to the DB remote_access_vpn table are also missing. Attempting to create the VPN via the API also fails, implying its more than a UI issue, the code appears not to be included the RC. If this is supposed to be in the 4.3.0 release, as a new sixth round RC has just been spun I will test again, if still missing guess I'll vote -0 as it's not a blocker, just missing when it should be there. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: 18 February 2014 22:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) Hi Geoff, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Remote+Access+VPN+for+VPC I just checked the latest 4.3 code and VPN for VPC works well. The steps are(as refered in the spec): 1. User click VPC's IP list 2. User choose VPC's source nat IP 3. User click Enable VPN 4. Others are the same as remote access VPN of isolated network --Sheng On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: All, I was trying to test the new Remote Access VPN to VPC feature which is apparently included in 4.3.0 but I cannot get it to work from the UI (no buttons) or from the API. Are there some new API commands I should be using, as I believe I have the latest 4.3.0 API calls, and there are no specific VPC Remote VPN APIs listed. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 February 2014 12:26 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) -1 (binding) tested vlan based standalone network tested vlan based bridged network tested vpc with vlan based gateway and - tier network tested vpc with nicira based gateway and - tier network All tests included creation of an instance and pinging the router from the instance. All tests passed in the end but a note on the side is that all vlan based tests didn't pass the ping test first time around. interface were created with no ip and after manually assigning ips, the routers still couldn't be pinged, For no obvious reason they passed after destroying the network and recreating it. This worries me but will lead to a +0 as such. I can not yet point to a bug that causes this. My -1 is due to another issue: a fix submitted to the 4.3-forward branch wasn't cherry-picked to this rc. See my earlier mail [1]. I had assumed it would be included due to [2]. [1] http://markmail.org/message/sujzvfefxsohurt5 [2] http://markmail.org/message/n2q46ovlkvgyunyk kind regards, Daan Hoogland On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote: Thanks Geoff, I did not have a setup to verify again, I just brought one up and that failure was a false alarm. Dedicate vlan range test passed in the next run. So, it is a +1 from my side Sent from HTC - Reply message - From: Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 5:11 AM I've update the Jira ticket with the following comment: I have tried to reproduce this manually and have not been able to re-create the issue. Added a new Guest VLAN Range in addition to the existing range, then dedicated to a normal user account, all successful, and all on the latest RC (fifth round). Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com] Sent: 17 February 2014 22:29 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) There is a new test failure in this RC which is a regression from previous RC. Created a bug for this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6131
RE: Can't login to webui
Mike, Can you tell me what OS and version you are running on your management server? Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:25:21 -0700 Subject: Re: Can't login to webui From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org CC: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Sorry I don't have any useful assistance to provide here, but I just wanted to note that I have had this happen in the past, as well, and solved it by starting over from scratch. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Michael Phillips mphilli7...@hotmail.comwrote: something obviously went horribly wrong so I am starting over From: mphilli7...@hotmail.com To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Can't login to webui Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:23:46 -0600 So I enabled the account via mysql through the command linehowever the logs still say the password does not match when trying to login... err dev guys what could the pw be if not password? From: mphilli7...@hotmail.com To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Can't login to webui Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:05:21 -0600 hah...nice the logs are telling me the admin account is locked\disabled. So how does it become locked on a fresh install? From: mphilli7...@hotmail.com To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Can't login to webui Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:56:39 -0600 Looks like the admin account in the database has a hashed password of 0.180873463098773 From: mphilli7...@hotmail.com To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Can't login to webui Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:50:46 -0600 I have a new install on 4.2.1 on Centos, however I can not login to the UI using the default username\password combo of admin\password. I have checked my 'cloud' database and its has tables etc. I even checked the user table and it looks like there is an admin user... What am I missing?? -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)*
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
Sheng, Our e-mails will have crossed mid Atlantic - I just sent out an e-mail saying how it is now there and appears to be functioning in the sixth RC and will fully test tomorrow. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: 19 February 2014 19:26 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) Hi Geoff, In fact I just tested the latest 4.3 branch before replied to you yesterday, and there is no issue on mine. And it's already pass QA testing. It's really weird. Could you double confirm your version or your setup? The build I got is from: commit adf4dd59270917b1607940d7064748bd438cbbcc Author: Kelven Yang kelv...@gmail.com Date: Thu Feb 13 14:34:06 2014 -0800 CLOUDSTACK-6065: Fix NPE problem caused by the lack of context setup in threads from agent manager thread pool (cherry picked from commit 1283919f02e2c4d2652ca18693b6cf2906b2263d) Signed-off-by: Animesh Chaturvedi anim...@apache.org --Sheng On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Thanks Sheng, Unfortunately there is no Enable VPN option on the VPC Source NAT IP like there is on a normal Network Source NAT IP. Here is a link to the screen shot of the UI https://www.flickr.com/photos/115889886@N08/12631278043/ The vpc_id fields which according to the spec are supposed to have been added to the DB remote_access_vpn table are also missing. Attempting to create the VPN via the API also fails, implying its more than a UI issue, the code appears not to be included the RC. If this is supposed to be in the 4.3.0 release, as a new sixth round RC has just been spun I will test again, if still missing guess I'll vote -0 as it's not a blocker, just missing when it should be there. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: 18 February 2014 22:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) Hi Geoff, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Remote+Access+V PN+for+VPC I just checked the latest 4.3 code and VPN for VPC works well. The steps are(as refered in the spec): 1. User click VPC's IP list 2. User choose VPC's source nat IP 3. User click Enable VPN 4. Others are the same as remote access VPN of isolated network --Sheng On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: All, I was trying to test the new Remote Access VPN to VPC feature which is apparently included in 4.3.0 but I cannot get it to work from the UI (no buttons) or from the API. Are there some new API commands I should be using, as I believe I have the latest 4.3.0 API calls, and there are no specific VPC Remote VPN APIs listed. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 February 2014 12:26 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) -1 (binding) tested vlan based standalone network tested vlan based bridged network tested vpc with vlan based gateway and - tier network tested vpc with nicira based gateway and - tier network All tests included creation of an instance and pinging the router from the instance. All tests passed in the end but a note on the side is that all vlan based tests didn't pass the ping test first time around. interface were created with no ip and after manually assigning ips, the routers still couldn't be pinged, For no obvious reason they passed after destroying the network and recreating it. This worries me but will lead to a +0 as such. I can not yet point to a bug that causes this. My -1 is due to another issue: a fix submitted to the 4.3-forward branch wasn't cherry-picked to this rc. See my earlier mail [1]. I had assumed it would be included due to [2]. [1] http://markmail.org/message/sujzvfefxsohurt5 [2] http://markmail.org/message/n2q46ovlkvgyunyk kind regards, Daan Hoogland On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote: Thanks Geoff, I did not have a setup to verify again, I just brought one up and that failure was a false alarm. Dedicate vlan range test passed in the next run. So, it is a +1 from my side Sent from HTC - Reply message - From: Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth
Re: Review Request 17843: CLOUDSTACK-6058: Update the java binding used to the latest one that came with XenServer 6.2 sp1
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/ --- (Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 7:30 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Devdeep Singh, and Koushik Das. Changes --- Rebased with latest master. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6058 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6058 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Update the java bindings that are used in cloudstack with the latest one. There are two parts for this change, 1st one is to replace the java bindings; and second part is to add the customization's made in xenapi for Cloudstack. 1. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/ - Replaces the java bindings. 2. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17844/ - Customizations in xenapi for CloudStack. Diffs (updated) - deps/XenServerJava/src/LICENSE.Apache-2.0.txt PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/LICENSE.txt PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/Makefile PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/README.txt PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/APIVersion.java 8d7247d deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Auth.java cffaaac deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Blob.java 494b928 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Bond.java 935fd98 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Connection.java a652450 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Console.java ac2c9a7 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Crashdump.java be11588 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/DRTask.java 14a5e40 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/DataSource.java 5f777a3 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Event.java ec43814 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/GPUGroup.java 9070446 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Host.java 2195048 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostCpu.java 15fcfa7 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostCrashdump.java 02c3bd9 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostMetrics.java b41277a deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostPatch.java fa77588 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Marshalling.java 865bc16 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Message.java a3658e3 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Network.java e9194ef deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PBD.java d289824 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PCI.java e11230a deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PGPU.java 0f5ddb4 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PIF.java 27618b4 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PIFMetrics.java ab6268e deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Pool.java 7ceebb0 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PoolPatch.java 7361bc7 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Role.java 5808b13 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/SM.java 0ec3626 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/SR.java db6770f deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Secret.java 870725f deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Session.java bdf3b4c deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Subject.java a599f237 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Task.java 59d59f6 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Tunnel.java 44b236d deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Types.java 777d580 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/User.java dff27f5 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VBD.java 56e6f4b deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VBDMetrics.java 1f678fa deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VDI.java 992a6a6 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VGPU.java 19c88fd deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VGPUType.java PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VIF.java 8302800 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VIFMetrics.java 0c17217 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VLAN.java 9bea039 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VM.java cfa5e6c deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VMAppliance.java b7e7e36 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VMGuestMetrics.java 08d88e3 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VMMetrics.java 5f9a7a4 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VMPP.java 0ee0b3e deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VTPM.java 25c3320 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/XenAPIObject.java b9821ee Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Re: Review Request 17843: CLOUDSTACK-6058: Update the java binding used to the latest one that came with XenServer 6.2 sp1
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/ --- (Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 7:31 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Devdeep Singh, and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6058 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6058 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Update the java bindings that are used in cloudstack with the latest one. There are two parts for this change, 1st one is to replace the java bindings; and second part is to add the customization's made in xenapi for Cloudstack. 1. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/ - Replaces the java bindings. 2. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17844/ - Customizations in xenapi for CloudStack. Diffs - deps/XenServerJava/src/LICENSE.Apache-2.0.txt PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/LICENSE.txt PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/Makefile PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/README.txt PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/APIVersion.java 8d7247d deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Auth.java cffaaac deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Blob.java 494b928 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Bond.java 935fd98 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Connection.java a652450 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Console.java ac2c9a7 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Crashdump.java be11588 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/DRTask.java 14a5e40 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/DataSource.java 5f777a3 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Event.java ec43814 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/GPUGroup.java 9070446 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Host.java 2195048 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostCpu.java 15fcfa7 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostCrashdump.java 02c3bd9 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostMetrics.java b41277a deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostPatch.java fa77588 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Marshalling.java 865bc16 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Message.java a3658e3 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Network.java e9194ef deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PBD.java d289824 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PCI.java e11230a deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PGPU.java 0f5ddb4 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PIF.java 27618b4 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PIFMetrics.java ab6268e deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Pool.java 7ceebb0 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PoolPatch.java 7361bc7 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Role.java 5808b13 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/SM.java 0ec3626 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/SR.java db6770f deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Secret.java 870725f deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Session.java bdf3b4c deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Subject.java a599f237 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Task.java 59d59f6 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Tunnel.java 44b236d deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Types.java 777d580 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/User.java dff27f5 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VBD.java 56e6f4b deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VBDMetrics.java 1f678fa deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VDI.java 992a6a6 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VGPU.java 19c88fd deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VGPUType.java PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VIF.java 8302800 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VIFMetrics.java 0c17217 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VLAN.java 9bea039 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VM.java cfa5e6c deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VMAppliance.java b7e7e36 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VMGuestMetrics.java 08d88e3 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VMMetrics.java 5f9a7a4 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VMPP.java 0ee0b3e deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VTPM.java 25c3320 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/XenAPIObject.java b9821ee Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
Oh, just saw it. Glad to hear that! --Sheng On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Sheng, Our e-mails will have crossed mid Atlantic - I just sent out an e-mail saying how it is now there and appears to be functioning in the sixth RC and will fully test tomorrow. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: 19 February 2014 19:26 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) Hi Geoff, In fact I just tested the latest 4.3 branch before replied to you yesterday, and there is no issue on mine. And it's already pass QA testing. It's really weird. Could you double confirm your version or your setup? The build I got is from: commit adf4dd59270917b1607940d7064748bd438cbbcc Author: Kelven Yang kelv...@gmail.com Date: Thu Feb 13 14:34:06 2014 -0800 CLOUDSTACK-6065: Fix NPE problem caused by the lack of context setup in threads from agent manager thread pool (cherry picked from commit 1283919f02e2c4d2652ca18693b6cf2906b2263d) Signed-off-by: Animesh Chaturvedi anim...@apache.org --Sheng On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Thanks Sheng, Unfortunately there is no Enable VPN option on the VPC Source NAT IP like there is on a normal Network Source NAT IP. Here is a link to the screen shot of the UI https://www.flickr.com/photos/115889886@N08/12631278043/ The vpc_id fields which according to the spec are supposed to have been added to the DB remote_access_vpn table are also missing. Attempting to create the VPN via the API also fails, implying its more than a UI issue, the code appears not to be included the RC. If this is supposed to be in the 4.3.0 release, as a new sixth round RC has just been spun I will test again, if still missing guess I'll vote -0 as it's not a blocker, just missing when it should be there. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: 18 February 2014 22:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) Hi Geoff, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Remote+Access+V PN+for+VPC I just checked the latest 4.3 code and VPN for VPC works well. The steps are(as refered in the spec): 1. User click VPC's IP list 2. User choose VPC's source nat IP 3. User click Enable VPN 4. Others are the same as remote access VPN of isolated network --Sheng On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: All, I was trying to test the new Remote Access VPN to VPC feature which is apparently included in 4.3.0 but I cannot get it to work from the UI (no buttons) or from the API. Are there some new API commands I should be using, as I believe I have the latest 4.3.0 API calls, and there are no specific VPC Remote VPN APIs listed. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 February 2014 12:26 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) -1 (binding) tested vlan based standalone network tested vlan based bridged network tested vpc with vlan based gateway and - tier network tested vpc with nicira based gateway and - tier network All tests included creation of an instance and pinging the router from the instance. All tests passed in the end but a note on the side is that all vlan based tests didn't pass the ping test first time around. interface were created with no ip and after manually assigning ips, the routers still couldn't be pinged, For no obvious reason they passed after destroying the network and recreating it. This worries me but will lead to a +0 as such. I can not yet point to a bug that causes this. My -1 is due to another issue: a fix submitted to the 4.3-forward branch wasn't cherry-picked to this rc. See my earlier mail [1]. I had assumed it would be included due to [2]. [1] http://markmail.org/message/sujzvfefxsohurt5 [2] http://markmail.org/message/n2q46ovlkvgyunyk kind regards, Daan Hoogland On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote: Thanks Geoff, I did not have a setup to verify again, I just brought one up and that failure was a false alarm. Dedicate vlan range test passed
Re: Review Request 17844: CLOUDSTACK-6058: Update the java binding used to the latest one that came with XenServer 6.2 sp1.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17844/ --- (Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 7:33 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Devdeep Singh, and Koushik Das. Changes --- Rebased with latest master. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6058 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6058 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Update the java bindings that are used in cloudstack with the latest one. There are two parts for this change, 1st one is to replace the java bindings; and second part is to add the customization's made in xenapi for Cloudstack. 1. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/ - Replaces the java bindings. 2. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17844/ - Customizations in xenapi for CloudStack. Diffs (updated) - deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Connection.java a652450 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Event.java ec43814 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VDI.java 992a6a6 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17844/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Re: Can't login to webui
Typically Mac OS X 10.8.3 or Ubuntu 12.04. This is always set up for development purposes. I don't use the scripts that an admin would use to set the system up. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Michael Phillips mphilli7...@hotmail.comwrote: Mike, Can you tell me what OS and version you are running on your management server? Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:25:21 -0700 Subject: Re: Can't login to webui From: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org CC: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Sorry I don't have any useful assistance to provide here, but I just wanted to note that I have had this happen in the past, as well, and solved it by starting over from scratch. On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Michael Phillips mphilli7...@hotmail.comwrote: something obviously went horribly wrong so I am starting over From: mphilli7...@hotmail.com To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Can't login to webui Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:23:46 -0600 So I enabled the account via mysql through the command linehowever the logs still say the password does not match when trying to login... err dev guys what could the pw be if not password? From: mphilli7...@hotmail.com To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Can't login to webui Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 23:05:21 -0600 hah...nice the logs are telling me the admin account is locked\disabled. So how does it become locked on a fresh install? From: mphilli7...@hotmail.com To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Can't login to webui Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:56:39 -0600 Looks like the admin account in the database has a hashed password of 0.180873463098773 From: mphilli7...@hotmail.com To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Can't login to webui Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 22:50:46 -0600 I have a new install on 4.2.1 on Centos, however I can not login to the UI using the default username\password combo of admin\password. I have checked my 'cloud' database and its has tables etc. I even checked the user table and it looks like there is an admin user... What am I missing?? -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)*
Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions
Hi Alex, One thing I wanted to ask about/mention on this was regarding the restriction you have mentioned in the wiki on resources have different uuids in different regions even if they are identical. We discussed this a bit offline, but I think it would be beneficial to allow for the the UUIDs to be carried over to the other regions when you're replicating resources. I'm not sure how others feel about this feature, but I know that in our discussions we will need this feature if we are to rely on the sync to create domains/accounts/user across all the regions as the UUID is in the identifying factor of uniqueness. Let me know your thoughts on this and whether or not this can be added, at least as an optional item if needed. Thanks -- David Grizzanti Software Engineer Sungard Availability Services e: david.grizza...@sungard.com w: 215.446.1431 c: 570.575.0315 On February 6, 2014 at 3:19:52 PM, Alex Ough (alex.o...@sungard.com) wrote: Hi Chiradeep, Thanks for your reply. The change is just to add timestamps when record has been changed to decide the time order when a same resource has been changed independently in different regions. The changes are minimum and additions, so I don't think they will cause any side effects. Thanks Alex Ough On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: I am uncomfortable with changes to GenericDaoBase. Was this really necessary? This feature was supposed to be outside CloudStack as much as possible and optional. Yet it touches the most sensitive code in CloudStack. From: Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com Date: Thursday, February 6, 2014 6:29 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Chip Childers chipchild...@gmail.org, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com, Kishan Kavala kishan.kav...@citrix.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions All, I just sent a review request, so please take a look at it and let me know if you have any comments/suggests. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17790/ Thanks Alex Ough On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote: All, I'd like to have some suggestion about 2 things related with this. 1. The 'Full Scan' management Now, I set it running every time a user logs in to the UI, but I think it will be necessary to make it run with some interval also. But I'm not familiar with the config file, so can anyone give some directions how to manage the time interval in the config file and the best way to run it with the time interval? 2. Repository of regions with their login information. To send/receive requests to/from other regions using API interfaces, we need the region information including login info of each region. I was planning to use a table as a repository, but I think it is better to store it in the config file to make the access a little lighter. Any recommendation on this? Your reply with directions comments will be very appreciated. Thanks Alex Ough On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote: All, A little bit of updates after a long vacation, I'm currently creating automated test scripts that randomly create/delete/update domain/account/user objects in random regions to trigger the sync-up and full scans regularly. Once they are completed, I'll post it in the github also and submit the review requests for this implementation. Let me know if you have any comments. Thanks Alex Ough On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.comwrote: All, I updated the wiki after some logic changes, so please review them, especially Full Scan, which is newly introduced. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Domain-Account-User+Sync+Up+Among+Multiple+Regions And I implemented this functionality in Java and you can get the pull request of it here. (This does not include the 'full scan' yet and I'm currently working on this to finalize.) https://github.com/alexoughsg/Albatross/pull/1 Especially, I really want to have your review on the Full Scan logic to confirm if it does not miss any cases. Thanks for your interest and your feedback will be very helpful. Alex Ough On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote: Good point, Chiradeep, I'm not sure if you reviewed my design doc in the wiki, but my design is to just skip any actions for target resources that already took place by any means. But the issue is when conflict actions in the same resources (like create delete the same users) are enqueued in reversed orders, which is hopefully rare. And to support consistency in
[Request] to replace xenserver java binding with latest one
Hi all, With XenServer 6.2SP1 release, we now have the new java bindings. These bindings also have the support for gpu and vGPU (for nVIDIA K1 and K2 cards) functionality in XenServer. I have uploaded two patches for the same; 1st one to replace the java bindings and 2nd one for xapi customizations as per CloudStack code. Patches: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/ https://reviews.apache.org/r/17844/ Also, I have verified the VM lifecycle and other operations with these changes. Please let me know about your views on this. --Sanjay
Re: Review Request 17843: CLOUDSTACK-6058: Update the java binding used to the latest one that came with XenServer 6.2 sp1
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/#review34930 --- It looks like a lot of the license headers are wrong in this file. Please make sure they are complying to the license headers as they should be for CloudStack code. See the LICENSE.header file for examples, especially the copyright notice should not be there. Also isn't this a good time to feed the changes we need in the java bindings back to the xen-api-sdk project on github (https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api-sdk)? It would be nice if we could just depend on that project instead of having to include a copy in our own source tree. - Hugo Trippaers On Feb. 19, 2014, 7:31 p.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/ --- (Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 7:31 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Devdeep Singh, and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6058 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6058 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Update the java bindings that are used in cloudstack with the latest one. There are two parts for this change, 1st one is to replace the java bindings; and second part is to add the customization's made in xenapi for Cloudstack. 1. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/ - Replaces the java bindings. 2. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17844/ - Customizations in xenapi for CloudStack. Diffs - deps/XenServerJava/src/LICENSE.Apache-2.0.txt PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/LICENSE.txt PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/Makefile PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/README.txt PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/APIVersion.java 8d7247d deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Auth.java cffaaac deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Blob.java 494b928 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Bond.java 935fd98 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Connection.java a652450 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Console.java ac2c9a7 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Crashdump.java be11588 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/DRTask.java 14a5e40 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/DataSource.java 5f777a3 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Event.java ec43814 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/GPUGroup.java 9070446 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Host.java 2195048 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostCpu.java 15fcfa7 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostCrashdump.java 02c3bd9 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostMetrics.java b41277a deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostPatch.java fa77588 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Marshalling.java 865bc16 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Message.java a3658e3 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Network.java e9194ef deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PBD.java d289824 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PCI.java e11230a deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PGPU.java 0f5ddb4 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PIF.java 27618b4 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PIFMetrics.java ab6268e deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Pool.java 7ceebb0 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PoolPatch.java 7361bc7 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Role.java 5808b13 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/SM.java 0ec3626 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/SR.java db6770f deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Secret.java 870725f deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Session.java bdf3b4c deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Subject.java a599f237 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Task.java 59d59f6 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Tunnel.java 44b236d deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Types.java 777d580 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/User.java dff27f5 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VBD.java 56e6f4b deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VBDMetrics.java 1f678fa deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VDI.java 992a6a6 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VGPU.java 19c88fd deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VGPUType.java PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VIF.java 8302800 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VIFMetrics.java 0c17217 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VLAN.java 9bea039
Re: Review Request 17843: CLOUDSTACK-6058: Update the java binding used to the latest one that came with XenServer 6.2 sp1
On Feb. 19, 2014, 9:27 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: It looks like a lot of the license headers are wrong in this file. Please make sure they are complying to the license headers as they should be for CloudStack code. See the LICENSE.header file for examples, especially the copyright notice should not be there. Also isn't this a good time to feed the changes we need in the java bindings back to the xen-api-sdk project on github (https://github.com/xapi-project/xen-api-sdk)? It would be nice if we could just depend on that project instead of having to include a copy in our own source tree. This is not CloudStack code. This is a dependency that we've effectively forked. We have no standing to change the license headers; it's not ours. Wholeheartedly agree - I'd far prefer we upstream our changes and stop bundling this dependency. --David - David --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/#review34930 --- On Feb. 19, 2014, 7:31 p.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/ --- (Updated Feb. 19, 2014, 7:31 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Devdeep Singh, and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6058 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6058 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Update the java bindings that are used in cloudstack with the latest one. There are two parts for this change, 1st one is to replace the java bindings; and second part is to add the customization's made in xenapi for Cloudstack. 1. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/ - Replaces the java bindings. 2. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17844/ - Customizations in xenapi for CloudStack. Diffs - deps/XenServerJava/src/LICENSE.Apache-2.0.txt PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/LICENSE.txt PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/Makefile PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/README.txt PRE-CREATION deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/APIVersion.java 8d7247d deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Auth.java cffaaac deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Blob.java 494b928 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Bond.java 935fd98 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Connection.java a652450 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Console.java ac2c9a7 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Crashdump.java be11588 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/DRTask.java 14a5e40 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/DataSource.java 5f777a3 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Event.java ec43814 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/GPUGroup.java 9070446 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Host.java 2195048 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostCpu.java 15fcfa7 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostCrashdump.java 02c3bd9 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostMetrics.java b41277a deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/HostPatch.java fa77588 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Marshalling.java 865bc16 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Message.java a3658e3 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Network.java e9194ef deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PBD.java d289824 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PCI.java e11230a deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PGPU.java 0f5ddb4 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PIF.java 27618b4 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PIFMetrics.java ab6268e deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Pool.java 7ceebb0 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/PoolPatch.java 7361bc7 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Role.java 5808b13 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/SM.java 0ec3626 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/SR.java db6770f deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Secret.java 870725f deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Session.java bdf3b4c deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Subject.java a599f237 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Task.java 59d59f6 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Tunnel.java 44b236d deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/Types.java 777d580 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/User.java dff27f5 deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VBD.java 56e6f4b deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VBDMetrics.java 1f678fa deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VDI.java 992a6a6
[DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads
Hi all, The fact that one has to have a HTTP server to host templates before the templates can be imported into secondary storage is an inconvenience. I am not sure how much of an inconvenience it is, but I was asked to detail the technical architecture, if it needed to be supported. Certainly, I can imagine for folks coming in contact with ACS for the first time, it might seem onerous to set up another web server. I've sketched a strawman proposal [1] to support browser-based uploads of templates and volumes to secondary storage. It is not yet a PROPOSAL since it is still raw (and I do not have time to work on this immediately). Please comment on this. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/jY5cAg
Re: [DISCUSS] Browser-based template and volume uploads
We definitely need to support more than http download. http upload sounds interesting, but I’d love to see something more resilient for large uploads. How ‘bout specifying a “drop folder” type location on the mgmt server that the server polls every 15 seconds for new files, then in the UI the user can pick from the files shown there? Not as secure as your browser upload pattern, though. Maybe use something like https://github.com/blueimp/jquery-file-upload that allows resumable uploads? Just had the thought of maybe adding support for dropbox/box.net/etc. At that point, an ImageFetch plugin hook starts to sound interesting. Adding a bit torrent plugin could make getting the default templates quite snappy. :) On Feb 19, 2014, at 2:12 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Hi all, The fact that one has to have a HTTP server to host templates before the templates can be imported into secondary storage is an inconvenience. I am not sure how much of an inconvenience it is, but I was asked to detail the technical architecture, if it needed to be supported. Certainly, I can imagine for folks coming in contact with ACS for the first time, it might seem onerous to set up another web server. I've sketched a strawman proposal [1] to support browser-based uploads of templates and volumes to secondary storage. It is not yet a PROPOSAL since it is still raw (and I do not have time to work on this immediately). Please comment on this. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/jY5cAg
Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions
Hi Dave, resources have different uuids in different regions even if they are identical is not a restriction but a normal case because maintaining a same uuid can be difficult in some cases like when 2 different users create the same resource in different regions at the same time. But it will not be an issue if you still want to maintain the same UUIDs because the resource map table will have the same uuid for each resource across all regions. The only thing to be changed is to set the resource UUID in the API create calls to send the create requests to remote regions during the real time synchronization. Let me know if this is not clear. Thanks Alex Ough On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:47 PM, David Grizzanti david.grizza...@sungard.com wrote: Hi Alex, One thing I wanted to ask about/mention on this was regarding the restriction you have mentioned in the wiki on resources have different uuids in different regions even if they are identical. We discussed this a bit offline, but I think it would be beneficial to allow for the the UUIDs to be carried over to the other regions when you're replicating resources. I'm not sure how others feel about this feature, but I know that in our discussions we will need this feature if we are to rely on the sync to create domains/accounts/user across all the regions as the UUID is in the identifying factor of uniqueness. Let me know your thoughts on this and whether or not this can be added, at least as an optional item if needed. Thanks -- David Grizzanti Software Engineer Sungard Availability Services e: david.grizza...@sungard.com w: 215.446.1431 c: 570.575.0315 On February 6, 2014 at 3:19:52 PM, Alex Ough (alex.o...@sungard.com//alex.o...@sungard.com) wrote: Hi Chiradeep, Thanks for your reply. The change is just to add timestamps when record has been changed to decide the time order when a same resource has been changed independently in different regions. The changes are minimum and additions, so I don't think they will cause any side effects. Thanks Alex Ough On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: I am uncomfortable with changes to GenericDaoBase. Was this really necessary? This feature was supposed to be outside CloudStack as much as possible and optional. Yet it touches the most sensitive code in CloudStack. From: Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com Date: Thursday, February 6, 2014 6:29 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Chip Childers chipchild...@gmail.org, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com, Kishan Kavala kishan.kav...@citrix.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions All, I just sent a review request, so please take a look at it and let me know if you have any comments/suggests. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17790/ Thanks Alex Ough On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote: All, I'd like to have some suggestion about 2 things related with this. 1. The 'Full Scan' management Now, I set it running every time a user logs in to the UI, but I think it will be necessary to make it run with some interval also. But I'm not familiar with the config file, so can anyone give some directions how to manage the time interval in the config file and the best way to run it with the time interval? 2. Repository of regions with their login information. To send/receive requests to/from other regions using API interfaces, we need the region information including login info of each region. I was planning to use a table as a repository, but I think it is better to store it in the config file to make the access a little lighter. Any recommendation on this? Your reply with directions comments will be very appreciated. Thanks Alex Ough On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote: All, A little bit of updates after a long vacation, I'm currently creating automated test scripts that randomly create/delete/update domain/account/user objects in random regions to trigger the sync-up and full scans regularly. Once they are completed, I'll post it in the github also and submit the review requests for this implementation. Let me know if you have any comments. Thanks Alex Ough On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.comwrote: All, I updated the wiki after some logic changes, so please review them, especially Full Scan, which is newly introduced. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Domain-Account-User+Sync+Up+Among+Multiple+Regions And I implemented this functionality in Java and you can get the pull request of it here. (This does not include the 'full scan' yet and I'm currently working on this to finalize.)
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
I created vmware setup with latest 4.3 build commit (307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9), used vmware template available @ http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-vmware.ova I didn't observe any issue reported in defect https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5883 Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 11:02 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Hugo Trippaers; Sateesh Chodapuneedi; Rayees Namathponnan Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) I see the last db update to systemvm for vmware was done by Sateesh with commit https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=151c2398129f0e8dedb10622061a5736b8abcd24 This is after Hugo's commit to fix CLOUDSTACK-5883 and I am assuming Sateesh had included this fix for his build on 16th. The confusion may be coming from the fact that the template name was marked as 1-14 to I guess match with other templates. Rayees had uploaded the VMware template to cloud.com on 1/16 after Sateesh sent it to him for upload later that evening. Hugo do you still see the issue with template referred in db 'http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-vmware.ova'? Thanks Animesh -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:08 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) Geoff, The latest build is always on the jenkins server, http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm64/ I think Edison does the uploads of the images to cloud.com, i don't have access to that site. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 12:56, Geoff Higginbottom geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote: Hugo, I've just update the release docs and submitted a Pull Request with the changes. Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) -1 (binding) I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at http://apache-cloudstack-release- notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations and a wrong version number for the systemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can't upgrade from a previous release to the new release. Cheers, Hugo On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be. @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix was done in a hurry and communicated poorly. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlo g; h =refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+tes t+ p rocedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
-Original Message- From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:10 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) So looks like we should all be testing this latest RC with the system VM templates dated 2014-02-18 then? [Animesh] We had fixed the templates to be used in 4.3 and reflected the links in database after uploading to download.cloud.com Here are the links: HyperV: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2013-12-23-hyperv.vhd.bz2 KVM: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 VMWare: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-vmware.ova Xen: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2 Unless there is a discussed change that requires updating the templates we use these published templates. Thanks Animesh
RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Folks I want to clear up the confusion on system templates for 4.3 We had fixed the templates to be used in 4.3 and reflected the links in cloudstack database after uploading to download.cloud.com Here are the links: HyperV: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2013-12-23-hyperv.vhd.bz2 KVM: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 VMWare: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-vmware.ova Xen: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2 Unless there is a discussed change that requires updating the templates we use these published templates for 4.3. I am still waiting on feedback for this RC. Thanks Animesh From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 8:25 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions
Alex, That sounds reasonable. Can we add the change to the API create calls for domain/account/user to the scope of this work? Thanks -- David Grizzanti Software Engineer Sungard Availability Services e: david.grizza...@sungard.com w: 215.446.1431 c: 570.575.0315 On February 19, 2014 at 6:32:07 PM, Alex Ough (alex.o...@sungard.com) wrote: Hi Dave, resources have different uuids in different regions even if they are identical is not a restriction but a normal case because maintaining a same uuid can be difficult in some cases like when 2 different users create the same resource in different regions at the same time. But it will not be an issue if you still want to maintain the same UUIDs because the resource map table will have the same uuid for each resource across all regions. The only thing to be changed is to set the resource UUID in the API create calls to send the create requests to remote regions during the real time synchronization. Let me know if this is not clear. Thanks Alex Ough On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:47 PM, David Grizzanti david.grizza...@sungard.com wrote: Hi Alex, One thing I wanted to ask about/mention on this was regarding the restriction you have mentioned in the wiki on resources have different uuids in different regions even if they are identical. We discussed this a bit offline, but I think it would be beneficial to allow for the the UUIDs to be carried over to the other regions when you're replicating resources. I'm not sure how others feel about this feature, but I know that in our discussions we will need this feature if we are to rely on the sync to create domains/accounts/user across all the regions as the UUID is in the identifying factor of uniqueness. Let me know your thoughts on this and whether or not this can be added, at least as an optional item if needed. Thanks -- David Grizzanti Software Engineer Sungard Availability Services e: david.grizza...@sungard.com w: 215.446.1431 c: 570.575.0315 On February 6, 2014 at 3:19:52 PM, Alex Ough (alex.o...@sungard.com) wrote: Hi Chiradeep, Thanks for your reply. The change is just to add timestamps when record has been changed to decide the time order when a same resource has been changed independently in different regions. The changes are minimum and additions, so I don't think they will cause any side effects. Thanks Alex Ough On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: I am uncomfortable with changes to GenericDaoBase. Was this really necessary? This feature was supposed to be outside CloudStack as much as possible and optional. Yet it touches the most sensitive code in CloudStack. From: Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com Date: Thursday, February 6, 2014 6:29 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Chip Childers chipchild...@gmail.org, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com, Kishan Kavala kishan.kav...@citrix.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Domain/Account/User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions All, I just sent a review request, so please take a look at it and let me know if you have any comments/suggests. https://reviews.apache.org/r/17790/ Thanks Alex Ough On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote: All, I'd like to have some suggestion about 2 things related with this. 1. The 'Full Scan' management Now, I set it running every time a user logs in to the UI, but I think it will be necessary to make it run with some interval also. But I'm not familiar with the config file, so can anyone give some directions how to manage the time interval in the config file and the best way to run it with the time interval? 2. Repository of regions with their login information. To send/receive requests to/from other regions using API interfaces, we need the region information including login info of each region. I was planning to use a table as a repository, but I think it is better to store it in the config file to make the access a little lighter. Any recommendation on this? Your reply with directions comments will be very appreciated. Thanks Alex Ough On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.com wrote: All, A little bit of updates after a long vacation, I'm currently creating automated test scripts that randomly create/delete/update domain/account/user objects in random regions to trigger the sync-up and full scans regularly. Once they are completed, I'll post it in the github also and submit the review requests for this implementation. Let me know if you have any comments. Thanks Alex Ough On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Alex Ough alex.o...@sungard.comwrote: All, I updated the wiki after some logic changes, so please review them, especially Full Scan, which is newly introduced. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Domain-Account-User+Sync+Up+Among+Multiple+Regions
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
+1 Tested Adv. Zone with XS 6.2, Built Windows 2008 VM from ISO, Deleted failed ISO, Snapshot, Create a template from snapshot. However, I am still running into this bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6096 (which is not a blocker, but still very very annoying). Another thing, I ran into a weird situation were the system VMs were failing to start, but still consuming management IPs. CloudStack wasn't returning the IPs to the pool after the deployment errors. (Un)fortunately, I couldn't reproduce it yet... although I think it's related to the fact I added the host with VT flag disabled, and then later changed the BIOS flag for VT to enable. CloudStack panicked. But even if it's the case, it's a corner case, and not a blocker. Francois On 2/18/2014, 11:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Francois Gaudreault Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect fgaudrea...@cloudops.com 514-629-6775 - - - CloudOps 420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Folks I am now extending the voting period to regular 72 hours based on clarification from Chip in private@ and will now close on Friday evening PST. Please provide your feedback soon and help close out the release. Thanks Animesh On Feb 18, 2014, at 8:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.commailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: OVS plugin in CloudStack 4.3.0
Florin, There is still nothing changed from 4.2 release. Hope I can do in 4.3.1 with XenServer 6.2 supported as well. Sorry I'm too busy with study program these days... --Tuna Sent from my GT-N7000 On Feb 20, 2014 12:45 AM, Florin Dumitrascu florin.dumitra...@intunenetworks.com wrote: Hi Tuna, Can you please clarify what is the status of the functionality described below in relation to 4.3 release: http://cloudstack.readthedocs.org/en/latest/networking/ovs-plugin.html I am testing the last 4.3 release candidate at the moment and cannot see OVS under Network Service Providers. Are these changes going to make it into 4.3 release or is there nothing changed from 4.2.0 release ? (except the bug preventing GRE to work). Thank you, Florin IMPORTANT NOTE: The information in this e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately or telephone: +353 (0)1 6204700. We cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender.
Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130
Hi Hugo/Ian, I suspect https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6130 is caused by some of recent change of findbugs. It's likely got something wrong with GeneralDaoBase, and the most recently modifications are: commit 443acac92792cb2654c3414df276efac404f Author: Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com Date: Fri Feb 14 18:36:18 2014 +0100 Fix functional issue introduced by some findbug changes. commit 5a6ad11fa2ca3de64b94095c628bd3ba12e618c3 Author: Ian Southam isout...@schubergphilis.com Date: Wed Feb 12 17:08:52 2014 +0100 findbugs findings Signed-off-by: Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com From the error message, it shows statement as: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM user_ip_address INNER JOIN account ON user_ip_address.account_id=account.id INNER JOIN vlan ON user_ip_address.vlan_db_id=vlan.id WHERE user_ip_address.account_id=5 AND user_ip_address.allocated IS NOT NULL AND (account.type != 'VirtualNetwork' ) AND (vlan.vlan_type = ** NOT SPECIFIED ** ) And you can observed that some parameters have been shifted left by one position, because vlan.vlan_type should compare to virtualNetwork. It should related to i++/++i change in the commit. After reverting these two commits, everything is fine. Could you take a look? --Sheng
Re: Cloudstack jira item privileges
please check again. perhaps it didn't apply the first time. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:55:10PM +0530, Namita Chaudhari wrote: Hello David, I am still not able to assign the jira to myself. Thanks and Regards, Namita On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Namita Chaudhari namita.chaudh...@sungard.com wrote: Thanks David.. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:18 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Done; Enjoy. --David On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Namita Chaudhari namita.chaudh...@sungard.com wrote: Hello, Can someone grant me privileges to assign the jira item CLOUDSTACK-6035 to myself. Thanks and Regards, Namita -- *Namita Chaudhari* ??? SunGard Availability Services, India ??? Mobile: +91 9762922138 ??? Email: namita.chaudh...@sungard.com 8 Times Winner ??? BC Service Provider of the Year ??? 2011, 2010, 2009, 2006, 2005, 2002, 2000, 1999; Finalist ??? 2008, 2007, 2004, 2001 ??? Excellence in Infrastructure Management ??? 2010 ??? Outstanding Excellence in Business Continuity ??? 2008 ??? Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Service) ??? 2013 BCI Global Awards ??? Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Product) ??? 2013 BCI India Awards *[image: AS_yt]* http://www.youtube.com/user/SunGardAS*[image: AS_twitter]* https://twitter.com/SunGardASIN*[image: AS_in]*http://www.linkedin.com/company/sungardasin*[image: AS_gplus]* https://plus.google.com/102459878242108588663/*[image: AS_fb]* https://www.facebook.com/sungardas.in*[image: AS_ss]*http://www.slideshare.net/SunGardASIN/documents -- *Namita Chaudhari* ??? SunGard Availability Services, India ??? Mobile: +91 9762922138 ??? Email: namita.chaudh...@sungard.com 8 Times Winner ??? BC Service Provider of the Year ??? 2011, 2010, 2009, 2006, 2005, 2002, 2000, 1999; Finalist ??? 2008, 2007, 2004, 2001 ??? Excellence in Infrastructure Management ??? 2010 ??? Outstanding Excellence in Business Continuity ??? 2008 ??? Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Service) ??? 2013 BCI Global Awards ??? Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Product) ??? 2013 BCI India Awards *[image: AS_yt]* http://www.youtube.com/user/SunGardAS*[image: AS_twitter]* https://twitter.com/SunGardASIN*[image: AS_in]*http://www.linkedin.com/company/sungardasin*[image: AS_gplus]* https://plus.google.com/102459878242108588663/*[image: AS_fb]*https://www.facebook.com/sungardas.in*[image: AS_ss]* http://www.slideshare.net/SunGardASIN/documents -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: Cloudstack jira item privileges
Yes now I can assign the jira to myself. Thanks Prasanna. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: please check again. perhaps it didn't apply the first time. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:55:10PM +0530, Namita Chaudhari wrote: Hello David, I am still not able to assign the jira to myself. Thanks and Regards, Namita On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Namita Chaudhari namita.chaudh...@sungard.com wrote: Thanks David.. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:18 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Done; Enjoy. --David On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Namita Chaudhari namita.chaudh...@sungard.com wrote: Hello, Can someone grant me privileges to assign the jira item CLOUDSTACK-6035 to myself. Thanks and Regards, Namita -- *Namita Chaudhari* ??? SunGard Availability Services, India ??? Mobile: +91 9762922138 ??? Email: namita.chaudh...@sungard.com 8 Times Winner ??? BC Service Provider of the Year ??? 2011, 2010, 2009, 2006, 2005, 2002, 2000, 1999; Finalist ??? 2008, 2007, 2004, 2001 ??? Excellence in Infrastructure Management ??? 2010 ??? Outstanding Excellence in Business Continuity ??? 2008 ??? Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Service) ??? 2013 BCI Global Awards ??? Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Product) ??? 2013 BCI India Awards *[image: AS_yt]* http://www.youtube.com/user/SunGardAS*[image: AS_twitter]* https://twitter.com/SunGardASIN*[image: AS_in]* http://www.linkedin.com/company/sungardasin*[image: AS_gplus]* https://plus.google.com/102459878242108588663/*[image: AS_fb]* https://www.facebook.com/sungardas.in*[image: AS_ss]* http://www.slideshare.net/SunGardASIN/documents -- *Namita Chaudhari* ??? SunGard Availability Services, India ??? Mobile: +91 9762922138 ??? Email: namita.chaudh...@sungard.com 8 Times Winner ??? BC Service Provider of the Year ??? 2011, 2010, 2009, 2006, 2005, 2002, 2000, 1999; Finalist ??? 2008, 2007, 2004, 2001 ??? Excellence in Infrastructure Management ??? 2010 ??? Outstanding Excellence in Business Continuity ??? 2008 ??? Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Service) ??? 2013 BCI Global Awards ??? Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Product) ??? 2013 BCI India Awards *[image: AS_yt]* http://www.youtube.com/user/SunGardAS*[image: AS_twitter]* https://twitter.com/SunGardASIN*[image: AS_in]*http://www.linkedin.com/company/sungardasin*[image: AS_gplus]* https://plus.google.com/102459878242108588663/*[image: AS_fb]*https://www.facebook.com/sungardas.in*[image: AS_ss]* http://www.slideshare.net/SunGardASIN/documents -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com -- *Namita Chaudhari* ● SunGard Availability Services, India ● Mobile: +91 9762922138 ● Email: namita.chaudh...@sungard.com 8 Times Winner – BC Service Provider of the Year – 2011, 2010, 2009, 2006, 2005, 2002, 2000, 1999; Finalist – 2008, 2007, 2004, 2001 ● Excellence in Infrastructure Management – 2010 ● Outstanding Excellence in Business Continuity – 2008 ● Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Service) – 2013 BCI Global Awards ● Business Continuity Provider of the Year (BCM Product) – 2013 BCI India Awards *[image: AS_yt]* http://www.youtube.com/user/SunGardAS*[image: AS_twitter]* https://twitter.com/SunGardASIN*[image: AS_in]*http://www.linkedin.com/company/sungardasin*[image: AS_gplus]* https://plus.google.com/102459878242108588663/*[image: AS_fb]*https://www.facebook.com/sungardas.in*[image: AS_ss]* http://www.slideshare.net/SunGardASIN/documents
Re: Master blocker CLOUDSTACK-6130
This is found by daily BVT run and sent out in daily BVT reporting mail. It would be great if folks could actually pick up the bugs resulted from BVT failures immediately. Thanks, ~Talluri On 20/02/14 10:20 am, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote: Hi Hugo/Ian, I suspect https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6130 is caused by some of recent change of findbugs. It's likely got something wrong with GeneralDaoBase, and the most recently modifications are: commit 443acac92792cb2654c3414df276efac404f Author: Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com Date: Fri Feb 14 18:36:18 2014 +0100 Fix functional issue introduced by some findbug changes. commit 5a6ad11fa2ca3de64b94095c628bd3ba12e618c3 Author: Ian Southam isout...@schubergphilis.com Date: Wed Feb 12 17:08:52 2014 +0100 findbugs findings Signed-off-by: Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com From the error message, it shows statement as: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM user_ip_address INNER JOIN account ON user_ip_address.account_id=account.id INNER JOIN vlan ON user_ip_address.vlan_db_id=vlan.id WHERE user_ip_address.account_id=5 AND user_ip_address.allocated IS NOT NULL AND (account.type != 'VirtualNetwork' ) AND (vlan.vlan_type = ** NOT SPECIFIED ** ) And you can observed that some parameters have been shifted left by one position, because vlan.vlan_type should compare to virtualNetwork. It should related to i++/++i change in the commit. After reverting these two commits, everything is fine. Could you take a look? --Sheng
BVT report on master branch
On XenServer 6.2/Test Run: #19 Out of 17 failures, except for the following bugs rest of the failures are intermittent test script/env issues List Public Address is failing - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6130 Failed to create private gateway - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6084 Logs: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa-master/job/test-matrix-m aster/76/distro=centos63,hypervisor=xen,profile=xen62/artifact/76.tar.bz2 Link to test report: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-master/19/testReport/ Total:97 Fail :17 Skip :2 name passfailskip test_deploy_vm/ 1 0 0 test_global_settings/ 1 0 0 test_service_offerings/ 4 0 0 test_regions/ 1 0 0 test_resource_detail/ 1 0 0 test_vpc_vpn/ 0 2 0 test_multipleips_per_nic/ 1 0 0 test_affinity_groups/ 1 0 0 test_vm_life_cycle/ 9 1 0 test_routers/ 9 0 0 test_iso/ 5 0 1 test_non_contigiousvlan/ 1 0 0 test_volumes/ 8 1 0 test_templates/ 5 2 1 test_nic/ 1 0 0 test_ssvm/ 10 0 0 test_loadbalance/ 2 1 0 test_network_acl/ 1 0 0 test_internal_lb/ 1 0 0 test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2 0 0 test_public_ip_range/ 1 0 0 test_pvlan/ 1 0 0 test_portable_publicip/ 2 0 0 test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/ 3 0 0 test_reset_vm_on_reboot/ 1 0 0 test_vm_snapshots/0 3 0 test_privategw_acl/ 0 1 0 test_disk_offerings/ 3 0 0 test_scale_vm/1 0 0 test_network/ 1 6 0 test_guest_vlan_range/1 0 0 Thanks, ~Talluri
RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
Thank you all for your inputs. I will aggregate all these things into FS as appendix and will put comments there instead of replying here one by one. Once I am done with update in FS I will notify so that we can verify whether we are covering all or not. Thanks Regards Damodar/ -Original Message- From: abhisek basu [mailto:abhisekb...@msn.com] Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:16 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS Getting a Windows version will expand ACS reach to a large no of audience and make it more OS independent from its core. As far as the tools are concern, I am sure it's achievable, we have the most enthusiastic community contributors behind :) Sent from my iPhone On 16 Feb 2014, at 1:08 am, Alex Hitchins alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com wrote: I would guess that Windows has tools for managing a large number of Hyper-V hosts? I wonder what ACS would add to that. I still think it would be a very achievable goal and worth doing. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 15 February 2014 18:49 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS My view is that anyone who wants to use Hyper-V is very unlikely to want to have Linux based management servers lurking around, because I think they'll be pretty wedded to Microsoft to want Hyper-V as the hypervisor. So being able to deploy windows based management servers seems essential to the use of Hyper-V (for better or worse). I think also there are probably a lot of Windows based Enterprises who also wouldn't like to a couple of stray Linux boxes running the show. I guess Microsoft think there is a market for Windows based private clouds or they wouldn't have created the Behemoth that is the Azure Pack. ...and Apache Tomcat have managed to create a windows port - so how hard can it be? [tic] Regards Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: 15 February 2014 18:29 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote: I see this as that CS management server should run anywhere java runs. However, I see quite a few holes in this proposal. - Management server should never have mounted the NFS secondary storage. We need to fix that. Please have a talk with Kelven about this. I don't see us adding Samba to any machine that runs the management server. If this is just about seeding the system template, it can be done as part of installation rather than management server. - If I truly think about Windowsification, I think windows installer, windows service, opening ports in windows firewall. I don't see any of that here. Or else it's useless for windows people. - For java, most people write a windows service that launches the jvm and keeps track of the jvm. - There's a number of things that CloudStack management server does today at startup that should not be there and those are what complicates the windowfication. These things should be moved out of the management server and into installation. What should be inside the management server startup procedure should be checks, rather than generations. It should check for ssh key exists and the database version matches etc but it should not do the following. - Upgrade of the database - ssh key generation - iso generation. --Alex A couple of more to add to the list. There isn't really a good binary software dependency resolution framework for Windows (at least not that I am aware of) and you potentially need lots of different things - mysql libraries, python, ipmitool, or another shell to execute shell scripts. Look at the list of the dependencies we install in the RPMs for an idea of things that are missing. Is the plan to bundle those in the binaries? (If so, we need to be having a serious discussion around a shift of a number system requirements to dependencies which may or may not be acceptable.) With what appears to be some serious refactoring in how the management server works that Alex outlines and I doubt this is a short term goal. (e.g. 4.4 timeframe). If you are going to take on all of the refactoring work, please start by building tests that prove that it all works today and then verify the same behavior in the refactored work. --David Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? Our CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ offers the best 24/7 SLA for
Review Request 18304: CLOUDSTACK:4840: Adding further test cases for Multiple IPs per NIC feature
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18304/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4840
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4840
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
Adding additional 15 test cases for Multiple IPs per NIC feature.
Diffs
-
test/integration/component/test_multiple_ips_per_nic.py 7d7e9f1
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18304/diff/
Testing
---
Yes.
1 test case failed during cleanup operation due to internal server error.
Logging a separate bug for that.
Log:
test_add_PF_rule_ISOLATED (test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
test_add_PF_rule_SHARED (test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
test_add_PF_rule_VPC (test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
test_add_static_nat_rule_ISOLATED (test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
test_add_static_nat_rule_SHARED (test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ERROR
test_add_static_nat_rule_VPC (test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
test_delete_PF_nat_rule_ISOLATED (test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
test_delete_PF_nat_rule_SHARED (test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
test_delete_PF_nat_rule_VPC (test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
test_disable_static_nat_ISOLATED (test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
test_disable_static_nat_SHARED (test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
test_disable_static_nat_VPC (test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
test_disassociate_ip_mapped_to_secondary_ip_through_PF_rule_ISOLATED
(test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
test_disassociate_ip_mapped_to_secondary_ip_through_PF_rule_SHARED
(test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
test_disassociate_ip_mapped_to_secondary_ip_through_PF_rule_VPC
(test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM ... ok
ERROR
==
ERROR: test_add_static_nat_rule_SHARED
(test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
Add secondary IP to NIC of a VM
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /root/CS_TEST_3/CS_TEST/test_multiple_ips_per_nic.py, line 558, in
tearDown
raise Exception(Warning: Exception during cleanup : %s % e)
Exception: Warning: Exception during cleanup : Execute cmd: asyncquery failed,
due to: {errorcode : 530, errortext : u'Command failed due to Internal Server
Error'}
==
ERROR: tearDownClass (test_multiple_ips_per_nic.TestNetworkRules)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /root/CS_TEST_3/CS_TEST/test_multiple_ips_per_nic.py, line 543, in
tearDownClass
raise Exception(Warning: Exception during cleanup : %s % e)
Exception: Warning: Exception during cleanup : Execute cmd:
deletenetworkoffering failed, due to: errorCode: 431, errorText:Can't delete
network offering 76 as
its used by 1 networks. To make the network offering unavaiable, disable it
--
Ran 15 tests in 12781.842s
FAILED (errors=2)
Thanks,
Gaurav Aradhye
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
Animesh, Before we agree to use these templates, please detail how these are build. The current process is not transparent to the developer community so for now i’m -1 on using these templates. The process should be clear end-to-end before we can reasonably be expected to vote on a release as the templates are an integral part of the release and should include scripts and artifacts from the release being voted on. As demonstrated by the bugs found in CLOUDSTACK-5883 the procedure that is currently part of our community template build process is not the actual procedure used to build the systemVMs that are made available to the community. Before we proceed with the release we need to make sure that the systemvm build is part of the community process and thus part of the vote we are having. How can we reasonably expect somebody to vote on a release when part of the release is not done in the open? Cheers, Hugo On 20 feb. 2014, at 01:10, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: Folks I want to clear up the confusion on system templates for 4.3 We had fixed the templates to be used in 4.3 and reflected the links in cloudstack database after uploading to download.cloud.com Here are the links: HyperV: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2013-12-23-hyperv.vhd.bz2 KVM: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 VMWare: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-vmware.ova Xen: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2 Unless there is a discussed change that requires updating the templates we use these published templates for 4.3. I am still waiting on feedback for this RC. Thanks Animesh From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 8:25 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round) Hi All, I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period. Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9 List of changes: New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST) For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
