Re: [QUESTION] How come we don't include Users@ in vote threads?

2014-11-17 Thread Chip Childers
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:44 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org wrote:
 I agree that more tests are welcome, we have to try then :)

 Afaik non-pmc's aren't binding and any votes would merely be an
 indication,
 or do i  misunderstand?

 All votes are important [1] and count as indicator, who ever vote mean
 something, It also show that the community members did some tests  or
 review of some kind. And whoever doing a -1 with valid justification will
 be listen. It would be much more interesting to see an RC with 15 non
 binding votes than the  3 minimum binding.

 [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html


Just my 2 cents:

Some Apache communities include users@ to get user feedback, and other's
do not. IMO, what would be better is for us to engage the user community
to help test the release prior to adding the voting overhead. The act of
voting should (hopefully) not be that big of a deal. I'd much rather
find ways to recruit users to become testers earlier on in the cycle.

If you look at our last several releases, QA / quality has been lacking
during the release process. It's often been active users that start
testing only when they see the vote thread. The question I'd pose is:
how do we figure out how to pull these individuals into the cycle
earlier.

-chip


[ACS44] release 4.4.2 imminent

2014-11-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
People,

I want to make a new 4.4 release after not delivering the quality I
would like for 4.4.0 and 4.4.1. I want to call on all to test the head
of the 44 branch before I do. Both two prior releases have known
issues within one week after release. In my opinion it would be great
if we can prevent the next release from having such issues, so once
again please test to your best at 4.4 and report to me (in this thread
for instance).

I addition to that I would like to have a test and evaluation session
here @apachecon about the 4.4.2 to asses it's quality. Any of you
around Budapest are welcome to join in. Wednesday is the plan.

kind regards,
-- 
Daan


Re: did anyone try 4.4.2?

2014-11-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
That one is fixed (i hope)

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org wrote:
 I'm trying to build 4.4.2 from 4.4 branch. I'm having the db deployment
 error that schema-441to442.sql does not exist. Could it be the cause of the
 problem you are seeing too ?

 On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 I run into a strange exception during the spring load phase. Did
 anybody run 442 yet?

 --
 Daan




-- 
Daan


Re: [ACS44] release 4.4.2 imminent

2014-11-17 Thread Nux!
Cheers, will do. Till when do we have to do this?

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
 To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org, us...@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, 17 November, 2014 08:56:22
 Subject: [ACS44] release 4.4.2 imminent

 People,
 
 I want to make a new 4.4 release after not delivering the quality I
 would like for 4.4.0 and 4.4.1. I want to call on all to test the head
 of the 44 branch before I do. Both two prior releases have known
 issues within one week after release. In my opinion it would be great
 if we can prevent the next release from having such issues, so once
 again please test to your best at 4.4 and report to me (in this thread
 for instance).
 
 I addition to that I would like to have a test and evaluation session
 here @apachecon about the 4.4.2 to asses it's quality. Any of you
 around Budapest are welcome to join in. Wednesday is the plan.
 
 kind regards,
 --
 Daan


Re: [ACS44] release 4.4.2 imminent

2014-11-17 Thread Andrija Panic
Hi Dan,

would you mind provide 4.4.2 RPMs somewhere so we can test the upgrade from
4.4.1 ?

best

On 17 November 2014 09:56, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:

 People,

 I want to make a new 4.4 release after not delivering the quality I
 would like for 4.4.0 and 4.4.1. I want to call on all to test the head
 of the 44 branch before I do. Both two prior releases have known
 issues within one week after release. In my opinion it would be great
 if we can prevent the next release from having such issues, so once
 again please test to your best at 4.4 and report to me (in this thread
 for instance).

 I addition to that I would like to have a test and evaluation session
 here @apachecon about the 4.4.2 to asses it's quality. Any of you
 around Budapest are welcome to join in. Wednesday is the plan.

 kind regards,
 --
 Daan




-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--


Re: [ACS44] release 4.4.2 imminent

2014-11-17 Thread Erik Weber
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:

 People,

 I want to make a new 4.4 release after not delivering the quality I
 would like for 4.4.0 and 4.4.1. I want to call on all to test the head
 of the 44 branch before I do. Both two prior releases have known
 issues within one week after release. In my opinion it would be great
 if we can prevent the next release from having such issues, so once
 again please test to your best at 4.4 and report to me (in this thread
 for instance).

 I addition to that I would like to have a test and evaluation session
 here @apachecon about the 4.4.2 to asses it's quality. Any of you
 around Budapest are welcome to join in. Wednesday is the plan.


Any idea when on Wednesday it might be? Won't arrive before 14ish.

-- 
Erik


Re: Review Request 28032: CLOUDSTACK-7913 - Added reconnect functionality to Host class in base.py

2014-11-17 Thread SrikanteswaraRao Talluri

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28032/#review61706
---

Ship it!


19781e094b987cf65d05d890cd3cd86fc22cb873 4.5 and master

- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri


On Nov. 14, 2014, 3:14 p.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://reviews.apache.org/r/28032/
 ---
 
 (Updated Nov. 14, 2014, 3:14 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for cloudstack, sangeetha hariharan and SrikanteswaraRao 
 Talluri.
 
 
 Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7913
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7913
 
 
 Repository: cloudstack-git
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 Reconnect method in Host Class can be used to reconnect a host in CloudStack 
 Setup. 
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py 580d0ab 
 
 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28032/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Test enable Maintenance Mode on Hosts which have VPC elements ... === 
 TestName: test_01_enable_maintenance_with_vpc_nw | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test cancel Maintenance Mode on the above Hosts + Migrate VMs Back ... === 
 TestName: test_02_cancel_maintenance | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test reconnect Host which has VPC elements ... === TestName: 
 test_03_reconnect_host | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 
 --
 Ran 3 tests in 463.515s
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Chandan Purushothama
 




[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7620: Added SNMP MIB file for ...

2014-11-17 Thread rajesh-battala
Github user rajesh-battala commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/31#issuecomment-63280334
  
Merging the commit to master as it had passed CI build


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


Re: Review Request 28039: CLOUDSTACK-7912: Remove hardcoded netscaler info and read it from config file

2014-11-17 Thread SrikanteswaraRao Talluri

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28039/#review61707
---

Ship it!


5f99917991a59f8ecd6d8b0e17b497fe210e636e 4.5 and master

- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri


On Nov. 14, 2014, 2:34 p.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://reviews.apache.org/r/28039/
 ---
 
 (Updated Nov. 14, 2014, 2:34 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
 
 
 Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7912
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7912
 
 
 Repository: cloudstack-git
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 In many test cases, netscaler info is hard coded into test cases. Also they 
 are read from different sources, such as hardcoded config in test case and 
 test_data.py file.
 
 Ideally this information should be present in config file so that the marvin 
 code doesn't have to be changed while running test cases. We just should have 
 to make changes in config file.
 
 Additional changes:
 1. Pep8 fixes
 2. Import fixes
 
 
 Important note:
 
 Following strucutre should be present in config file. If not present, the 
 test cases will be skipped.
 
 netscalerDevice: {
 ipaddress: x.x.x.x,
 username: ,
 password: ,
 networkdevicetype: ,
 publicinterface: 1/1,
 privateinterface: 1/1,
 numretries: 2,
 lbdevicededicated: False, #(Or True)
 lbdevicecapacity: 2,
 port: 22
 }
 
 Values should be set according to netscaler device available.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   test/integration/component/test_lb_secondary_ip.py daffe34 
   test/integration/component/test_netscaler_lb.py 4c99aa3 
   test/integration/component/test_netscaler_lb_algo.py 6eda9a3 
   test/integration/component/test_netscaler_lb_sticky.py c333f60 
   test/integration/component/test_persistent_networks.py 4cd0aa8 
   tools/marvin/marvin/lib/common.py 9e3d40c 
 
 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28039/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Yes.
 
 Ran few test cases and result is as following:
 
 Test Create a SourceBased stick policy for a Lb rule with ... === TestName: 
 test_01_source_based_roundrobin | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Create a SourceBased stick policy for a Lb rule ... === TestName: 
 test_02_source_based_source_algo | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Create a SourceBased stick policy for a Lb rule with leastconn algo 
 ... === TestName: test_03_source_based_leastconn | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Create a LBCookie stick policy for a Lb rule with roundrobin algo ... 
 === TestName: test_04_lbcookie_based_roundrobin | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Create a LBCookie stick policy for a Lb rule with Source algorithm 
 ... === TestName: test_05_lbcookie_source_algo | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Create a LBCookie stick policy for a Lb rule with leastconn algo ... 
 === TestName: test_06_lbcookie_leastconn | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Create a AppCookie stick policy for a Lb rule with roundrobin algo ... 
 === TestName: test_07_appcookie_based_roundrobin | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Create a AppCookie stick policy for a Lb rule with Source ... === 
 TestName: test_08_appcookie_source_algo | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Create a AppCookie stick policy for a Lb rule with leastconn ... === 
 TestName: test_09_appcookie_leastconn | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 
 --
 Ran 9 tests in 540.990s
 
 OK
 
 Test edit LB rule from least conn to round robin algo ... === TestName: 
 test_lb_least_conn_to_round_robin | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 === TestName: test_lb_least_conn_to_round_robin | Status : EXCEPTION ===
 ERROR
 Test edit LB rule from round robin to source algo ... === TestName: 
 test_lb_leastconn_to_source | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test edit LB rule from round robin to least connection algo ... === TestName: 
 test_lb_round_robin_to_least_conn | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test edit LB rule from round robin to source algo ... === TestName: 
 test_lb_round_robin_to_source | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test edit LB rule from source to least conn algo ... === TestName: 
 test_lb_source_to_least_conn | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test edit LB rule from source to round robin algo ... === TestName: 
 test_lb_source_to_round_robin | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Create LB rule with least connection algorithm ... === TestName: 
 test_lb_with_least_conn | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Create LB rule with round robin algorithm ... === TestName: 
 test_lb_with_round_robin | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 
 
 Test Add multiple Vms to an existing LB rule. ... === TestName: 
 test_add_multiple_vms_lb | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test create LB rule with same public port after deleting rule ... === 
 TestName: 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7703, CLOUDSTACK-7752: Fixed d...

2014-11-17 Thread rajesh-battala
Github user rajesh-battala commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/30#issuecomment-63281107
  
merging this patch to Master as it had passed CI as well


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


Jenkins build is back to normal : build-4.5 #139

2014-11-17 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/139/changes



Re: [ACS44] release 4.4.2 imminent

2014-11-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
So we will have to wait for you with starting;)

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 People,

 I want to make a new 4.4 release after not delivering the quality I
 would like for 4.4.0 and 4.4.1. I want to call on all to test the head
 of the 44 branch before I do. Both two prior releases have known
 issues within one week after release. In my opinion it would be great
 if we can prevent the next release from having such issues, so once
 again please test to your best at 4.4 and report to me (in this thread
 for instance).

 I addition to that I would like to have a test and evaluation session
 here @apachecon about the 4.4.2 to asses it's quality. Any of you
 around Budapest are welcome to join in. Wednesday is the plan.


 Any idea when on Wednesday it might be? Won't arrive before 14ish.

 --
 Erik



-- 
Daan


Re: [ACS44] release 4.4.2 imminent

2014-11-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
I think, till we o longer find bugs that bug us. Not sure, but as far
as I know there is no bug in it now. I just don't want to go into a 72
hour vote period now untill I get some support for the release.

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 Cheers, will do. Till when do we have to do this?

 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
 From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
 To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org, us...@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, 17 November, 2014 08:56:22
 Subject: [ACS44] release 4.4.2 imminent

 People,

 I want to make a new 4.4 release after not delivering the quality I
 would like for 4.4.0 and 4.4.1. I want to call on all to test the head
 of the 44 branch before I do. Both two prior releases have known
 issues within one week after release. In my opinion it would be great
 if we can prevent the next release from having such issues, so once
 again please test to your best at 4.4 and report to me (in this thread
 for instance).

 I addition to that I would like to have a test and evaluation session
 here @apachecon about the 4.4.2 to asses it's quality. Any of you
 around Budapest are welcome to join in. Wednesday is the plan.

 kind regards,
 --
 Daan



-- 
Daan


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7620: Added SNMP MIB file for ...

2014-11-17 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/31


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7620: Added SNMP MIB file for ...

2014-11-17 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/31#issuecomment-63287776
  
closing pull request as this got merged to master


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7703, CLOUDSTACK-7752: Fixed d...

2014-11-17 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/30


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7703, CLOUDSTACK-7752: Fixed d...

2014-11-17 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/30#issuecomment-63287919
  
closing this PR as patch got committed


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7758: Fixed although api calls...

2014-11-17 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/29


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7541: Added restriction to not...

2014-11-17 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/28


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


Jenkins build is back to stable : simulator-singlerun #640

2014-11-17 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/640/changes



Re: Show volumes - showing another VM's volume

2014-11-17 Thread Andrija Panic
Created improvement ticket  - to consider implementing Volume purging, just
like with VMs...so they are not deleted immediatey - so there is time to
recover the volume...

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7926



On 12 November 2014 14:48, Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com wrote:

 I've noticed this happen several times as well.  Usually when it does I'll
 notice the same volume come up no matter what instance I'm looking at, and
 like you mentioned the only fix is a full page refresh.


 Thank You,

 Logan Barfield
 Tranquil Hosting

 On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Hi guys,
  I have just run into (GUI) bug in CS 4.4.1:
 
  Clicked on freshly deployed instance, clicked on Show Volumes, detached
  volume and deleted it - later I realized that the volume belonged some
  other VM.
 
  Confirmed again, by clicking on this same new VM, clicking on show
 volumes,
  and when I click on the volume that's still attached - it says this
 volume
  belogns to another already running VM.
 
  So basicaly, I lost my volume/data because of this bug...
 
  When I reloaded GUI by refreshing the URL in browser address bar, only
  after that, correct volumes were show.
 
  I don't know how to reproduce this problem, but I lost my data...
 
  --
 
  Andrija Panić
  --
http://admintweets.com
  --
 




-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--


Re: [TEST] DevCloud4 - rework / Cleanup

2014-11-17 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Hi Ian,

I'm trying to run the binary-advanced,  in the Public IPs of the zone the
gateway is 192.168.23.5, should my box have the IP 192.168.23.5 instead of
the current 192.168.23.1 ?


thanks,

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:

 Hi Pierre,

 So advanced and basic are running from code on the host machine. Only a
 NFS, MySQL and hypervisor box is supplied.

 Testing is for binary-installation-advanced and binary-installation-basic.


 On 16 November 2014 19:44, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:

  Hi Ian,
  I'm trying it as it seams quite strait forward.  although, the
 instruction
  to install cloudstack [1]: I should run that in the management VM right,
  not locally ? does IPs are hardcoded somewhere?
 
  Thanks, that's awesome to have a local cloudstack running without effort.
  I'm testing this on OSX and so far the installation process is easy and
  well documented (still few things missing :-P )!
 
 
  [1]
 
 
 https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/tree/master/advanced#start-cloudstack
 
 
  *Pierre-Luc DION*
  Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
  t 855.652.5683
 
  *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
  420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
  w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
 
 
  On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
 
   TL;DR: Devcloud 4 cleaned up a bit, chef attributes no longer hidden,
   further user customisation allowed, Testers wanted.
  
   ** advanced zone on 4.4.* isn't supported due to a change on some API
  param
   for setting tags on interfaces **
  
   Hi All,
  
  
 
 https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/tree/dev/binary-installation-basic
  
   I've pushed some clean up work for binary-installation versions
  DevCloud4.
   I've moved a few things about so chef attributes are no longer
 completely
   black boxed and are more exposed to the user so they are aware they can
   change system vm locations, rpm locations, etc.
  
   Along with this I've moved to using berkshelf for pulling in the chef
   cookbooks. Sadly this adds a dependency on ChefDK but it works better
 for
   cookbook updates.
   I've also upped the amount of RAM given to XenServer and the System
 VMs.
   (6gb for XenServer and 256 for ssvm cpvm rvm)... I would suggest
 running
  on
   a system with 16gb of ram. I may lower this down in the future but I
 felt
   their was some performance issues in allocating only 100mb of ram to
 the
   system vms.
  
   URLs to resources should now be more stable. I'm no longer hosting a
  marvin
   binary, its pulled in from pypi. All default URLs for RPMs and SystemVM
   images are pointing to shapeblues repo :).
  
   The chef cookbook powering it all is a modification from the one
 created
  by
   the folks over at CloudOps.
  
   If anybody is interested in testing I'd love to hear some feedback:
  
   ** Note should work on osx, linux and windows (in theory, windows
 remains
   untested)**
   ** you need chefdk installed on your machine along with
 vagrant-berkshelf
   **
   ** you need virtualbox interfaces vboxnet0 vboxnet1 vboxnet2 with ips
   192.168.22.1, 192.168.23.1 and 192.168.24.1 respectively along with
   disabling the DHCP Server **
  
   git clone https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4.git
   git checkout -b dev origin/dev
   cd binary-installation-basic or binary-installation-advanced
   vagrant up
  
   Thanks,
  
   Ian
  
 



Re: [ACS44] release 4.4.2 imminent

2014-11-17 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Trying devcloud4 with 4.4 branch  and I'm having this issue:

[WARNING]
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at org.codehaus.mojo.exec.ExecJavaMojo$1.run(ExecJavaMojo.java:297)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to
upgrade the database
at
com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:336)
at
com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:431)
at com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseCreator.main(DatabaseCreator.java:217)
... 6 more
Caused by: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to find
db/schema-441to442.sql
at
com.cloud.upgrade.dao.Upgrade441to442.getPrepareScripts(Upgrade441to442.java:50)
at
com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:303)
... 8 more

I don't see the schema-441to442.sql files in the db folder too.

does 442 is on a different branch?


On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:

 So we will have to wait for you with starting;)

 On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
  wrote:
 
  People,
 
  I want to make a new 4.4 release after not delivering the quality I
  would like for 4.4.0 and 4.4.1. I want to call on all to test the head
  of the 44 branch before I do. Both two prior releases have known
  issues within one week after release. In my opinion it would be great
  if we can prevent the next release from having such issues, so once
  again please test to your best at 4.4 and report to me (in this thread
  for instance).
 
  I addition to that I would like to have a test and evaluation session
  here @apachecon about the 4.4.2 to asses it's quality. Any of you
  around Budapest are welcome to join in. Wednesday is the plan.
 
 
  Any idea when on Wednesday it might be? Won't arrive before 14ish.
 
  --
  Erik



 --
 Daan



Jenkins build became unstable: simulator-singlerun #641

2014-11-17 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/641/changes



Re: [ACS44] release 4.4.2 imminent

2014-11-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org wrote:
 Trying devcloud4 with 4.4 branch  and I'm having this issue:

 I don't see the schema-441to442.sql files in the db folder too.

 does 442 is on a different branch?

no, I added the file locallly and forgot to commit. it is pushed now, sorry


-- 
Daan


New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for cloudstack

2014-11-17 Thread scan-admin

Hi,

Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found 
with Coverity Scan.

11 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan.
18 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the 
recent build analyzed by Coverity Scan.

New defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
Showing 11 of 11 defect(s)


** CID 1254843:  Copy-paste error  (COPY_PASTE_ERROR)
/server/src/com/cloud/capacity/CapacityManagerImpl.java: 712 in 
com.cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl.updateCapacityForHost(com.cloud.host.Host)()

** CID 1254842:  Bx: Questionable Boxing of primitive value  
(FB.BX_UNBOXING_IMMEDIATELY_REBOXED)
/server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java: 1409 in 
com.cloud.network.NetworkServiceImpl.commitNetwork(java.lang.Long, 
java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, 
java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, 
com.cloud.user.Account, java.lang.Long, java.lang.Long, java.lang.Long, 
boolean, java.lang.Boolean, java.lang.Long, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, 
java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.Boolean, java.lang.Long, 
java.lang.String, com.cloud.offerings.NetworkOfferingVO, 
com.cloud.network.PhysicalNetwork, 
org.apache.cloudstack.acl.ControlledEntity$ACLType, com.cloud.user.Account, 
java.lang.String, boolean)()

** CID 1254841:  DLS: Dead local store  (FB.DLS_DEAD_LOCAL_STORE)
/server/src/com/cloud/network/router/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java: 
2577 in 
com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.postStateTransitionEvent(com.cloud.utils.fsm.StateMachine2$Transition,
 com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachine, boolean, java.lang.Object)()

** CID 1254840:  Dm: Dubious method used  (FB.DM_DEFAULT_ENCODING)
/plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/Xenserver625StorageProcessor.java:
 1054 in 
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.Xenserver625StorageProcessor.createTemplateFromSnapshot2(org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand)()

** CID 1254839:  Dm: Dubious method used  (FB.DM_DEFAULT_ENCODING)
/utils/src/org/apache/cloudstack/utils/graphite/GraphiteClient.java: 86 in 
org.apache.cloudstack.graphite.GraphiteClient.sendMetrics(java.util.Map, long)()

** CID 1254838:  REC: RuntimeException capture  (FB.REC_CATCH_EXCEPTION)
/plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/Xenserver625StorageProcessor.java:
 1102 in 
com.cloud.hypervisor.xenserver.resource.Xenserver625StorageProcessor.createTemplateFromSnapshot2(org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand)()

** CID 1254837:  REC: RuntimeException capture  (FB.REC_CATCH_EXCEPTION)
/server/src/com/cloud/server/StatsCollector.java: 515 in 
com.cloud.server.StatsCollector$VmStatsCollector.runInContext()()

** CID 1254835:  Dereference after null check  (FORWARD_NULL)
/server/src/com/cloud/alert/ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.java: 63 in 
com.cloud.alert.ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.onProxyAlert(java.lang.Object, 
com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyAlertEventArgs)()
/server/src/com/cloud/alert/ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.java: 69 in 
com.cloud.alert.ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.onProxyAlert(java.lang.Object, 
com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyAlertEventArgs)()
/server/src/com/cloud/alert/ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.java: 80 in 
com.cloud.alert.ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.onProxyAlert(java.lang.Object, 
com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyAlertEventArgs)()
/server/src/com/cloud/alert/ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.java: 91 in 
com.cloud.alert.ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.onProxyAlert(java.lang.Object, 
com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyAlertEventArgs)()
/server/src/com/cloud/alert/ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.java: 110 in 
com.cloud.alert.ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.onProxyAlert(java.lang.Object, 
com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyAlertEventArgs)()
/server/src/com/cloud/alert/ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.java: 121 in 
com.cloud.alert.ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.onProxyAlert(java.lang.Object, 
com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyAlertEventArgs)()
/server/src/com/cloud/alert/ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.java: 135 in 
com.cloud.alert.ConsoleProxyAlertAdapter.onProxyAlert(java.lang.Object, 
com.cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyAlertEventArgs)()

** CID 1254834:  Dereference after null check  (FORWARD_NULL)
/server/src/com/cloud/alert/SecondaryStorageVmAlertAdapter.java: 62 in 
com.cloud.alert.SecondaryStorageVmAlertAdapter.onSSVMAlert(java.lang.Object, 
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecStorageVmAlertEventArgs)()
/server/src/com/cloud/alert/SecondaryStorageVmAlertAdapter.java: 68 in 
com.cloud.alert.SecondaryStorageVmAlertAdapter.onSSVMAlert(java.lang.Object, 
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecStorageVmAlertEventArgs)()
/server/src/com/cloud/alert/SecondaryStorageVmAlertAdapter.java: 78 in 
com.cloud.alert.SecondaryStorageVmAlertAdapter.onSSVMAlert(java.lang.Object, 
com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecStorageVmAlertEventArgs)()
/server/src/com/cloud/alert/SecondaryStorageVmAlertAdapter.java: 92 in 

Re: [TEST] DevCloud4 - rework / Cleanup

2014-11-17 Thread Ian Duffy
Hi Pierre,
No that is correct. We cannot control the .1 interface which is on the host
machine. We can however control .5 and get it to do forwarding
On 17 Nov 2014 12:28, Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org wrote:

 Hi Ian,

 I'm trying to run the binary-advanced,  in the Public IPs of the zone the
 gateway is 192.168.23.5, should my box have the IP 192.168.23.5 instead of
 the current 192.168.23.1 ?


 thanks,

 On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:

  Hi Pierre,
 
  So advanced and basic are running from code on the host machine. Only a
  NFS, MySQL and hypervisor box is supplied.
 
  Testing is for binary-installation-advanced and
 binary-installation-basic.
 
 
  On 16 November 2014 19:44, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
 
   Hi Ian,
   I'm trying it as it seams quite strait forward.  although, the
  instruction
   to install cloudstack [1]: I should run that in the management VM
 right,
   not locally ? does IPs are hardcoded somewhere?
  
   Thanks, that's awesome to have a local cloudstack running without
 effort.
   I'm testing this on OSX and so far the installation process is easy and
   well documented (still few things missing :-P )!
  
  
   [1]
  
  
 
 https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/tree/master/advanced#start-cloudstack
  
  
   *Pierre-Luc DION*
   Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
   t 855.652.5683
  
   *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
   420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
   w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
  
  
   On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
  
TL;DR: Devcloud 4 cleaned up a bit, chef attributes no longer hidden,
further user customisation allowed, Testers wanted.
   
** advanced zone on 4.4.* isn't supported due to a change on some API
   param
for setting tags on interfaces **
   
Hi All,
   
   
  
 
 https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4/tree/dev/binary-installation-basic
   
I've pushed some clean up work for binary-installation versions
   DevCloud4.
I've moved a few things about so chef attributes are no longer
  completely
black boxed and are more exposed to the user so they are aware they
 can
change system vm locations, rpm locations, etc.
   
Along with this I've moved to using berkshelf for pulling in the chef
cookbooks. Sadly this adds a dependency on ChefDK but it works better
  for
cookbook updates.
I've also upped the amount of RAM given to XenServer and the System
  VMs.
(6gb for XenServer and 256 for ssvm cpvm rvm)... I would suggest
  running
   on
a system with 16gb of ram. I may lower this down in the future but I
  felt
their was some performance issues in allocating only 100mb of ram to
  the
system vms.
   
URLs to resources should now be more stable. I'm no longer hosting a
   marvin
binary, its pulled in from pypi. All default URLs for RPMs and
 SystemVM
images are pointing to shapeblues repo :).
   
The chef cookbook powering it all is a modification from the one
  created
   by
the folks over at CloudOps.
   
If anybody is interested in testing I'd love to hear some feedback:
   
** Note should work on osx, linux and windows (in theory, windows
  remains
untested)**
** you need chefdk installed on your machine along with
  vagrant-berkshelf
**
** you need virtualbox interfaces vboxnet0 vboxnet1 vboxnet2 with ips
192.168.22.1, 192.168.23.1 and 192.168.24.1 respectively along with
disabling the DHCP Server **
   
git clone https://github.com/imduffy15/devcloud4.git
git checkout -b dev origin/dev
cd binary-installation-basic or binary-installation-advanced
vagrant up
   
Thanks,
   
Ian
   
  
 



Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #642

2014-11-17 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes



Jenkins build is back to stable : simulator-singlerun #643

2014-11-17 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/643/changes



Jenkins build became unstable: simulator-singlerun #644

2014-11-17 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/644/



Re: Review Request 28043: CLOUDSTACK 7915: Remove hard-coded values for Load Balancer algorithms in UI

2014-11-17 Thread Daniel Vega Simoes

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28043/
---

(Updated Nov. 17, 2014, 6:26 p.m.)


Review request for cloudstack.


Changes
---

- as suggested by Rajani Karuturi, created a new function in network.js to list 
LB algorithms for a network.
- fixed internationalization for 'label.source'
- updated to use last commit on master 
(efe47b07044a863e5a34f48ef6e2468265925604)


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

JIRA: CLOUDSTACK 7915

Removed hard-coded values for Load Balancer algorithms in UI. 

Instead, now UI sets values loaded dynamically through load balancer provider 
capabilities.

Also updated internationalization messages.


Diffs (updated)
-

  client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties 86eb5c2 
  client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ar.properties 4f65118 
  client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_es.properties f2d754e 
  client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_fr_FR.properties 004187f 
  client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_it_IT.properties e2f3f0b 
  client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ja_JP.properties 7bc90b5 
  client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ko_KR.properties ce79d2e 
  client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_nb_NO.properties c169112 
  client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_nl_NL.properties 89ef828 
  client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_pl.properties 06d5ec2 
  client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_pt_BR.properties 8ee08ba 
  client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ru_RU.properties ff68668 
  client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_zh_CN.properties ebba5e0 
  ui/dictionary.jsp 671f48f 
  ui/scripts/network.js c27b999 
  ui/scripts/vpc.js af19d87 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28043/diff/


Testing (updated)
---

Tests performed:
- create new isolated network with DefaultIsolatedNetworkOffering, acquire new 
IP, list load balancer algorithms (UI)
- create new shared network with DefaultSharedNetworkWithSourceNat, acquire new 
IP, list load balancer algorithms (UI)

It should work correctly as long as network offering is configured with LB 
provider/capabilities. Otherwise, list of algorithms is empty in UI.


Thanks,

Daniel Vega Simoes



Multiple local storage pools?

2014-11-17 Thread Nux!
Hi guys,

Do you know how it would be possible to add multiple local primary storage 
pools? I know that if local storage is enabled /var/lib/libvirt/images (in 
KVM's case) is added automatically.
But assuming I want to add an SSD or SATA array to this host and want to 
differentiate it within cloudstack, how should I go about it?

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro


Re: Multiple local storage pools?

2014-11-17 Thread Andrija Panic
Lucian, don't relly have the answer - but did you maybe consider ZFS on
Linux, mounted on /var/lib/libvirt/images/ - there you can add SSD for
writings and perhaps read cache (SLOG for writes and L2ARC for readings) ?

On 17 November 2014 19:37, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

 Hi guys,

 Do you know how it would be possible to add multiple local primary storage
 pools? I know that if local storage is enabled /var/lib/libvirt/images (in
 KVM's case) is added automatically.
 But assuming I want to add an SSD or SATA array to this host and want to
 differentiate it within cloudstack, how should I go about it?

 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro




-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--


Re: [ACS44] release 4.4.2 imminent

2014-11-17 Thread Andrija Panic
Upgrade fine for me - no issues at all... - from the RPMs snapshots

On 17 November 2014 14:36, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org
 wrote:
  Trying devcloud4 with 4.4 branch  and I'm having this issue:

  I don't see the schema-441to442.sql files in the db folder too.
 
  does 442 is on a different branch?

 no, I added the file locallly and forgot to commit. it is pushed now, sorry


 --
 Daan




-- 

Andrija Panić
--
  http://admintweets.com
--


Re: Wasting Time !

2014-11-17 Thread Andrija Panic
Gents - my point of view on the cloudstack and the work arround it is the
folowing:

- Pretty lacking documentation
- Working on new fancy features - instead of making current features work
at all...
 - Few examples:
 -- new vxlan isolation method was introduced some release ago - default
MTU of 1450 is used - which makes need that every VM has lowered MTU
inside, in order to fucntion AT ALL !
 -- KVM full snapshots don't work
 -- GUI needs serious polishing, and I mean serious ! from sorting objects
by name or similar, to some bugs fix etc.
 -- Network throtling on only Public/Internet NIC of VPC/VR
 -- Usage server was HEAVILY broken, last time I got feedback from our
developer who is working on billing (at least ACS 4.3.0)
 -- etc,etc,etc..

I listed here just some of the issues I have reported, which have not been
adresses AT ALL - when I say addressed, that means I did not get even
replies.
(Again, it is not me here not geting replies, but potentially large number
of CS users that would benefit from the issues fixed.)

But we have time obviously to spend replying on Mohammeds provocation (I
say provocations since he is not replying to the thread) - instead of
polishing the product and making basic things work.

Again my 2 cents - just wanted to share my opinion on (un)completeness of
the product.
It's great for private use - but going public and trying to do business
with cloudstack is at the moment very painful - works, but is very painfull
and lacks some basic features.

My opinion is that we need products polished, instead of slamming on the
new fancy features, that nobody will use at the moment.

Again, any cloud product is VERY complex - a great mixture of different
technologies - so I understand it is not meant to be easy to operate and
develop.

Sorry for long post... I do my best to report bugs/imporvements and to make
critics, but other than that - not being adeveloper, can't really help that
much...





 -


On 17 November 2014 16:18, Noel King noelk...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi

 I also disagree completely with this thread having also checked out and
 installed Cloudstack competitors I found cloudstack probably the easiest
 and stablest to get running.  I come from a programming not infrastructure
 backdrop and as pointed out previously implementing a private cloud is not
 easy, but we managed to setup up for first Cloudstack cluster with 3
 servers in under one day's effort, the documentation provided was
 sufficient and was adequate for us to complete the task.

 I agree you with others you going to need to be more informative here on
 your problems as I have always found the community responsive and excellent
 to deal with.

 Kind regards

 Noel

 On 17 November 2014 15:05, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote:

  From my perspective there are two issues being raised in this thread.
 
  1. The original poster didn't actually ask a question, and despite
 requests
  for more information, nothing which would allow us to help was
  forthcoming.  We can't fix that which we don't know to be broken, and as
  we're all learning and building our respective experience can't hope to
  mirror that of anyone else.
 
  2. CloudStack is like every piece of software I've ever worked with; it
 has
  a learning curve.  Cloud in general forces you to rethink your paradigms,
  and for me building my first CloudStack cloud took six weeks of
 unlearning
  what I thought best practice.  Not everything I had to unlearn was
  CloudStack; some was just bad thinking called best practice.  There's
  lots of information out there, but a learning curve definitely exists,
 and
  even today years after that first experience I continue to learn new
 things
  about CloudStack.
 
  To Mohammad, I offer this suggestion.  You've engaged with this
 community,
  but specifics are lacking.  It isn't reasonable for the community to
 offer
  assistance without knowing what is troubling you.  Expectations are an
  important part of that, and we don't know what yours were, only that
 you're
  unhappy.
 
  Sandeep has raised specific issues, and I hope they were captured in
 Jira (
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK).  If they weren't then
  there is a very real possibility they won't be addressed until someone
  either reports it, or decides to directly fix it.  I know I'm guilty of
 not
  putting Jira reports in, and I suspect I'm not alone.  We all have the
  power to complain, but we also have the power to help fix an issue by
  taking a few extra minutes to just report the issue, and reporting on a
  mailing list doesn't count.
 
  Sorry for getting on my soap box, but I figured this thread had a good
  chance of showing up in some index in the future and that I had an
  opportunity to give a bit of guidance.  Hopefully I've not overstepped.
 
  -tim
 
  On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, sandeep khandekar 
  cloudstack.sand...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   I agree with him, it wastes time, but at the same time you are 

Why a particular commit is found in 4.4 branch but not master and 4.5

2014-11-17 Thread Kuang-Ching Wang
Hi, I am looking at an issue fixed a while back - 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5505

I am hitting the same issue with the 4.5 branch code, and after searching 
around found that the fix was only found in branch 4.4, not master, not 4.5

What does this mean?  The commit is only to be in 4.4, or its squashed before 
inclusion in later branches, including master?

Thanks,
KC





Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5 #140

2014-11-17 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/140/changes

Changes:

[jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-7927: UI  Infrastructure  Primary Storage  
detailView  add View Volumes link that will list all volumes under this 
primary storage when being clicked.

--
[...truncated 5997 lines...]
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-image-sample ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-image-sample ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-image-default ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 2 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-image-default ---
[INFO] Compiling 3 source files to 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/plugins/storage/image/default/target/classes
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-image-sample ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/plugins/storage/image/sample/resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-image-sample ---
[INFO] Compiling 3 source files to 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/plugins/storage/image/sample/target/classes
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-plugin-network-midonet ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/plugins/network-elements/midonet/test/resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-plugin-network-midonet ---
[INFO] Compiling 1 source file to 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/plugins/network-elements/midonet/target/test-classes
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-image-sample ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/plugins/storage/image/sample/test/resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-image-sample ---
[INFO] No sources to compile
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-image-sample ---
[INFO] Tests are skipped.
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Plugin - Storage Volume SolidFire Provider 
4.5.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-image-default ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/plugins/storage/image/default/test/resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-image-default ---
[INFO] No sources to compile
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-image-default ---
[INFO] Tests are skipped.
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Plugin - Storage Volume CloudByte Provider 
4.5.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-volume-solidfire ---
[INFO] Deleting 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/plugins/storage/volume/solidfire/target
 (includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ 
cloud-plugin-storage-volume-cloudbyte ---
[INFO] Deleting 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/plugins/storage/volume/cloudbyte/target
 (includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/plugins/storage/volume/solidfire
 (includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- 

Re: Why a particular commit is found in 4.4 branch but not master and 4.5

2014-11-17 Thread Kuang-Ching Wang
I figured this out - the CLOUDSTACK-5505 header is dropped when the fixes are 
merged into master and 4.5.

Then I don’t see why I am hitting the issue - created a VPC, when applying 
static NAT it failed to apply, and it is found the VpcVR does not have eth1.  
The log complains about “ethnull”, which I suppose is an issue that has been 
fixed long back …

KC


On Nov 17, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Kuang-Ching Wang kuangching.w...@gmail.com 
wrote:

 Hi, I am looking at an issue fixed a while back - 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5505
 
 I am hitting the same issue with the 4.5 branch code, and after searching 
 around found that the fix was only found in branch 4.4, not master, not 4.5
 
 What does this mean?  The commit is only to be in 4.4, or its squashed before 
 inclusion in later branches, including master?
 
 Thanks,
 KC
 
 
 



Re: Review Request 28043: CLOUDSTACK 7915: Remove hard-coded values for Load Balancer algorithms in UI

2014-11-17 Thread Brian Federle

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28043/#review61817
---


I am getting conflicts in the properties file applying to the latest master (my 
HEAD is @ eba7cc78da751cc25994a5a736a87ce2e83c394e). There were a lot of 
changes lately to the localization strings, which is probably why it is 
conflicting; could you try updating the patch?

Applying: CLOUDSTACK-7915: Remove hard-coded values for Load Balancer 
algorithms in UI
error: patch failed: 
client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_fr_FR.properties:1160
error: client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_fr_FR.properties: patch does 
not apply
error: patch failed: 
client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ja_JP.properties:740
error: client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ja_JP.properties: patch does 
not apply
error: patch failed: 
client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_zh_CN.properties:740
error: client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_zh_CN.properties: patch does 
not apply
Patch failed at 0001 CLOUDSTACK-7915: Remove hard-coded values for Load 
Balancer algorithms in UI

- Brian Federle


On Nov. 17, 2014, 6:26 p.m., Daniel Vega Simoes wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://reviews.apache.org/r/28043/
 ---
 
 (Updated Nov. 17, 2014, 6:26 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for cloudstack.
 
 
 Repository: cloudstack-git
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 JIRA: CLOUDSTACK 7915
 
 Removed hard-coded values for Load Balancer algorithms in UI. 
 
 Instead, now UI sets values loaded dynamically through load balancer provider 
 capabilities.
 
 Also updated internationalization messages.
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties 86eb5c2 
   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ar.properties 4f65118 
   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_es.properties f2d754e 
   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_fr_FR.properties 004187f 
   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_it_IT.properties e2f3f0b 
   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ja_JP.properties 7bc90b5 
   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ko_KR.properties ce79d2e 
   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_nb_NO.properties c169112 
   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_nl_NL.properties 89ef828 
   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_pl.properties 06d5ec2 
   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_pt_BR.properties 8ee08ba 
   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_ru_RU.properties ff68668 
   client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_zh_CN.properties ebba5e0 
   ui/dictionary.jsp 671f48f 
   ui/scripts/network.js c27b999 
   ui/scripts/vpc.js af19d87 
 
 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28043/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Tests performed:
 - create new isolated network with DefaultIsolatedNetworkOffering, acquire 
 new IP, list load balancer algorithms (UI)
 - create new shared network with DefaultSharedNetworkWithSourceNat, acquire 
 new IP, list load balancer algorithms (UI)
 
 It should work correctly as long as network offering is configured with LB 
 provider/capabilities. Otherwise, list of algorithms is empty in UI.
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Daniel Vega Simoes
 




Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #645

2014-11-17 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes



Re: Review Request 27305: CLOUDSTACK-7810 : Fixed the script test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py

2014-11-17 Thread sangeetha hariharan

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27305/#review61829
---

Ship it!


Ship It!

- sangeetha hariharan


On Nov. 15, 2014, 11:04 p.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://reviews.apache.org/r/27305/
 ---
 
 (Updated Nov. 15, 2014, 11:04 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for cloudstack and sangeetha hariharan.
 
 
 Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7810
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7810
 
 
 Repository: cloudstack-git
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 Test Cases are trying to validate SSH access and failing. These Test Cases 
 are not meant to be run on SImulator due to their validation requirements. 
 Hence they cannot be run with Simulator
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   test/integration/component/test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py 84e27df 
 
 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27305/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Changed the tags on Tests. Testing not done
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Chandan Purushothama
 




Re: Review Request 27305: CLOUDSTACK-7810 : Fixed the script test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py

2014-11-17 Thread Chandan Purushothama


 On Nov. 17, 2014, 10:45 p.m., sangeetha hariharan wrote:
  Ship It!

Commit e712ac78d0814b973886ccdbd2c1edd88a0bfbb9 in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from Chandan Purushothama
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=e712ac7 ]

CLOUDSTACK-7810 : Fixed the script 'test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py'


- Chandan


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27305/#review61829
---


On Nov. 15, 2014, 11:04 p.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote:
 
 ---
 This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
 https://reviews.apache.org/r/27305/
 ---
 
 (Updated Nov. 15, 2014, 11:04 p.m.)
 
 
 Review request for cloudstack and sangeetha hariharan.
 
 
 Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7810
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7810
 
 
 Repository: cloudstack-git
 
 
 Description
 ---
 
 Test Cases are trying to validate SSH access and failing. These Test Cases 
 are not meant to be run on SImulator due to their validation requirements. 
 Hence they cannot be run with Simulator
 
 
 Diffs
 -
 
   test/integration/component/test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py 84e27df 
 
 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27305/diff/
 
 
 Testing
 ---
 
 Changed the tags on Tests. Testing not done
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Chandan Purushothama
 




Re: Multiple local storage pools?

2014-11-17 Thread Nux!
Andrija, but I want a more straight forward way to use the SSDs. ZFS I'm sure 
it's awesome, but it would just complicate my setup. Thanks though.

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, 17 November, 2014 19:07:15
 Subject: Re: Multiple local storage pools?

 Lucian, don't relly have the answer - but did you maybe consider ZFS on
 Linux, mounted on /var/lib/libvirt/images/ - there you can add SSD for
 writings and perhaps read cache (SLOG for writes and L2ARC for readings) ?
 
 On 17 November 2014 19:37, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 
 Hi guys,

 Do you know how it would be possible to add multiple local primary storage
 pools? I know that if local storage is enabled /var/lib/libvirt/images (in
 KVM's case) is added automatically.
 But assuming I want to add an SSD or SATA array to this host and want to
 differentiate it within cloudstack, how should I go about it?

 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 
 
 
 --
 
 Andrija Panić
 --
  http://admintweets.com
 --


Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #646

2014-11-17 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes



Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-simulator #1150

2014-11-17 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/1150/

--
[...truncated 1135 lines...]
[INFO] No sources to compile
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-framework-events ---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/framework/events/target/surefire-reports

---
 T E S T S
---

Results :

Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-schema 
---
[INFO] Deleting 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/engine/schema/target
 (includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/engine/schema 
(includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-engine-schema ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-engine-schema ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-engine-schema ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 2 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-engine-schema ---
[INFO] Compiling 661 source files to 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/engine/schema/target/classes
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-engine-schema ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/engine/schema/test/resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-engine-schema ---
[INFO] Compiling 2 source files to 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/engine/schema/target/test-classes
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-schema 
---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/engine/schema/target/surefire-reports

---
 T E S T S
---
Running com.cloud.upgrade.dao.DatabaseAccessObjectTest
Tests run: 25, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.982 sec
Running com.cloud.upgrade.dao.DbUpgradeUtilsTest
Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.405 sec

Results :

Tests run: 33, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Framework - Jobs 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-framework-jobs 
---
[INFO] Deleting 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/framework/jobs/target
 (includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/framework/jobs 
(includes = [target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 1 resource
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[INFO] Compiling 33 source files to 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/framework/jobs/target/classes
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 4 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-framework-jobs 

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #647

2014-11-17 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes



[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7932: Fixed wrong semantics fo...

2014-11-17 Thread anshul1886
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/39

CLOUDSTACK-7932: Fixed wrong semantics for isVmAlive() method in 
HypervInvestigator

Fixed wrong semantics for isVmAlive() method in HypervInvestigator

Findbugs will report error on this as it is expecting true/false for 
Boolean value.
But we have diffrent meaning for null so it is false positive case from 
findbug

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/anshul1886/cloudstack-1 CLOUDSTACK-7932

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/39.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #39


commit fe07c08c0093bbe89732bf6509f12ec8a8a0a8f2
Author: Anshul Gangwar anshul.gang...@citrix.com
Date:   2014-11-17T07:30:42Z

CLOUDSTACK-7932: Fixed wrong semantics for isVmAlive() method in 
HypervInvestigator

Findbugs will report error on this as it is expecting true/false for 
Boolean value.
But we have diffrent meaning for null so it is false positive case from 
findbug




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7929: Unhandled exception when...

2014-11-17 Thread anshul1886
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/40

CLOUDSTACK-7929: Unhandled exception when setting negative value for 
throttling rate while creating network offering

To fix issue while creating network offering if one specifies negative 
value for network rate

then we will convert that value to 0 i.e. unlimited

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/anshul1886/cloudstack-1 CLOUDSTACK-7929

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/40.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #40


commit 2386a33e0df00920332892c00e0802be72cf63db
Author: Anshul Gangwar anshul.gang...@citrix.com
Date:   2014-11-14T05:26:05Z

CLOUDSTACK-7929: While creating network offering if one specifies negative 
value for network rate
then we will convert that value to 0 i.e. unlimited




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7930, CLOUDSTACK-7931: Do not ...

2014-11-17 Thread anshul1886
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/41

CLOUDSTACK-7930, CLOUDSTACK-7931: Do not allow to set invalid values for 
global settings which are of type integer and float

 Do not allow to set invalid values for global settings which are of type 
integer and float

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/anshul1886/cloudstack-1 CLOUDSTACK-7930

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/41.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #41


commit b7de1ecbe470365c30bc6afcea5f5c560bc9c8c2
Author: Anshul Gangwar anshul.gang...@citrix.com
Date:   2014-11-17T09:57:22Z

CLOUDSTACK-7930, CLOUDSTACK-7931: Do not allow to set invalid values for 
global settings which are of type integer and float




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


Re: Multiple local storage pools?

2014-11-17 Thread Andrija Panic
Ok, waiting for someone to answer this :)

Sent from Google Nexus 4
On Nov 18, 2014 12:35 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

 Andrija, but I want a more straight forward way to use the SSDs. ZFS I'm
 sure it's awesome, but it would just complicate my setup. Thanks though.

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
  From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Monday, 17 November, 2014 19:07:15
  Subject: Re: Multiple local storage pools?

  Lucian, don't relly have the answer - but did you maybe consider ZFS on
  Linux, mounted on /var/lib/libvirt/images/ - there you can add SSD for
  writings and perhaps read cache (SLOG for writes and L2ARC for readings)
 ?
 
  On 17 November 2014 19:37, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 
  Hi guys,
 
  Do you know how it would be possible to add multiple local primary
 storage
  pools? I know that if local storage is enabled /var/lib/libvirt/images
 (in
  KVM's case) is added automatically.
  But assuming I want to add an SSD or SATA array to this host and want to
  differentiate it within cloudstack, how should I go about it?
 
  Lucian
 
  --
  Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
  Nux!
  www.nux.ro
 
 
 
 
  --
 
  Andrija Panić
  --
   http://admintweets.com
  --



[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Merge 4.5 to master

2014-11-17 Thread karuturi
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/42

Merge 4.5 to master



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/karuturi/cloudstack merge-45-to-master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/42.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #42


commit 2d3b3376e37faeec3ed62a58750819dc7630260c
Author: Sheng Yang sheng.y...@citrix.com
Date:   2014-11-14T19:43:03Z

Revert CLOUDSTACK-7821: Fix OSX cannot connect to VPN due to wrongly 
declaim ENCAPSULATION_MODE_UDP_TRANSPORT_RFC

This reverts commit e1c788ca3c69a8c8c2041c7b106f76fa49332888.

It breaks Windows 7 client.

commit 425a6b01d60b88016c23a1126960375b00d97069
Author: Anthony Xu anthony...@citrix.com
Date:   2014-11-14T19:24:42Z

CLOUDSTACK-7918:
guest os name changes from 'SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 (experimental)' 
to 'SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 (64-bit)' in latest XS 5.6 ,
changed the guest OS mapping to fix it.

commit 303fc90057db2707ae8f6b709fb5e3e86fc9db40
Author: Milamber milam...@apache.org
Date:   2014-11-15T08:37:49Z

Update L10N resource files on master branch (with 4.5 translation strings)

commit 25e5d00f6016b31fc178da97c7125c2f37a8c40d
Author: Milamber milam...@apache.org
Date:   2014-11-15T08:38:34Z

Add 4.5.x messages.properties to Transifex config tool

commit 19781e094b987cf65d05d890cd3cd86fc22cb873
Author: Chandan Purushothama chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com
Date:   2014-11-14T06:56:01Z

CLOUDSTACK-7913 : Added reconnect functionality to Host class in base.py

Signed-off-by: SrikanteswaraRao Talluri tall...@apache.org

commit 5f99917991a59f8ecd6d8b0e17b497fe210e636e
Author: Gaurav Aradhye gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com
Date:   2014-11-14T14:23:25Z

CLOUDSTACK-7912: Remove hardcoded netscaler info and read it from config 
file

Signed-off-by: SrikanteswaraRao Talluri tall...@apache.org

commit 635abaf2e9ca4f0399085f441ea6d5eeaab9f3ab
Author: Jessica Wang jessicaw...@apache.org
Date:   2014-11-17T21:05:08Z

CLOUDSTACK-7927: UI  Infrastructure  Primary Storage  detailView  add 
View Volumes link that will list all volumes under this primary storage when 
being clicked.

commit aa5cb0838a340b9521f98a6dfc18bf076ab6f454
Author: Rajani Karuturi rajanikarut...@gmail.com
Date:   2014-11-18T06:12:07Z

Merge branch '4.5'

Conflicts:
client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages_zh_CN.properties




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


Review Request 28160: CloudStack-6282: Added event test cases in Ipaddresses

2014-11-17 Thread Monis Majeed

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28160/
---

Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.


Bugs: cloudstack-6282
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/cloudstack-6282


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

CloudStack-6282: Added event test cases in Ipaddresses


Diffs
-

  test/integration/component/test_escalations_ipaddresses.py 41e5b2f 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28160/diff/


Testing
---

Testing is done . Attached is the result log


File Attachments


results.txt
  
https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2014/11/18/c518dfef-9937-4bfe-8e1b-db0d4f4d7387__results.txt


Thanks,

Monis Majeed



Review Request 28161: CLOUDSTACK-7933: test_escalations_instances.py - Fixed test_13_vm_nics for Vmware

2014-11-17 Thread Gaurav Aradhye

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28161/
---

Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7933
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7933


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

Skipping remove nic operation for VMware when vmware tools are not installed on 
VM.


Diffs
-

  test/integration/component/test_escalations_instances.py fd25bb9 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28161/diff/


Testing
---

Yes.

log:
@Desc: Test to verify Nics for a VM ... === TestName: test_13_vm_nics | Status 
: SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 1 test in 255.060s

OK


Thanks,

Gaurav Aradhye



[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7932: Fixed wrong semantics fo...

2014-11-17 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/39#issuecomment-63428603
  
From the method definition (isVmAlive), looks like what it is doing is 
right. 
ideally, we should change the return type from Boolean to boolean in the 
interface. 

Maybe in the caller(HighAvailabilityManagerImpl), you could check for both 
null and false for now. 

Also, can you add some unittests? 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7929: Unhandled exception when...

2014-11-17 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/40#discussion_r20487864
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java 
---
@@ -3723,6 +3723,10 @@ public NetworkOffering 
createNetworkOffering(CreateNetworkOfferingCmd cmd) {
 throw new InvalidParameterValueException(Invalid value for 
Availability. Supported types:  + Availability.Required + ,  + 
Availability.Optional);
 }
 
+if (networkRate != null  networkRate  0) {
--- End diff --

is networkRate == null a valid value?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7932: Fixed wrong semantics fo...

2014-11-17 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/39#issuecomment-63429460
  
Actually null has different meaning than false. False means that vm is not 
alive while null means it cannot be determined whether it is alive or not. 

This is existing functionality for all hypervisor investigators so it 
doesn't make sense to write unit tests for this. This got changed to this 
behavior while fixing findbug  bugs. Better would be to use enum to represent 
various better states. But that will require many changes and can be taken for 
next release.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7929: Unhandled exception when...

2014-11-17 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/40#discussion_r20488120
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java 
---
@@ -3723,6 +3723,10 @@ public NetworkOffering 
createNetworkOffering(CreateNetworkOfferingCmd cmd) {
 throw new InvalidParameterValueException(Invalid value for 
Availability. Supported types:  + Availability.Required + ,  + 
Availability.Optional);
 }
 
+if (networkRate != null  networkRate  0) {
--- End diff --

yes. it means that networkRate parameter is not passed and networkRate for 
this offering will be taken from other global settings


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7930, CLOUDSTACK-7931: Do not ...

2014-11-17 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/41#discussion_r20488370
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java 
---
@@ -725,6 +725,21 @@ private String validateConfigurationValue(String name, 
String value, String scop
 type = c.getType();
 }
 
+String errMsg = null;
+try {
+if (type.equals(Integer.class)) {
+errMsg = There was error in trying to parse value:  + 
value + . Please enter a valid integer value for parameter  + name;
+Integer.parseInt(value);
+} else if (type.equals(Float.class)) {
+errMsg = There was error in trying to parse value:  + 
value + . Please enter a valid float value for parameter  + name;
+Float.parseFloat(value);
--- End diff --

should we allow values like 3,400.5 ?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7930, CLOUDSTACK-7931: Do not ...

2014-11-17 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/41#discussion_r20488404
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java 
---
@@ -725,6 +725,21 @@ private String validateConfigurationValue(String name, 
String value, String scop
 type = c.getType();
 }
 
+String errMsg = null;
+try {
+if (type.equals(Integer.class)) {
+errMsg = There was error in trying to parse value:  + 
value + . Please enter a valid integer value for parameter  + name;
+Integer.parseInt(value);
+} else if (type.equals(Float.class)) {
+errMsg = There was error in trying to parse value:  + 
value + . Please enter a valid float value for parameter  + name;
+Float.parseFloat(value);
+}
+} catch (Exception e) {
--- End diff --

Can you catch specific expected exceptions NPE and NFE?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7930, CLOUDSTACK-7931: Do not ...

2014-11-17 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/41#issuecomment-63430386
  
Can you add unittests for this?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7932: Fixed wrong semantics fo...

2014-11-17 Thread karuturi
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/39#issuecomment-63430873
  
In the second return statement, should it return false since the agent is 
alive and returned some status?

I didnt understand the argument for not adding unittests. I see that as an 
only way to avoid the same changes in future as findbugs would report it again 
and someone would attempt to fix it again. 
adding some documentation might help.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


Re: Multiple local storage pools?

2014-11-17 Thread Marcus
Not directly, but one way you could make this happen would be to create a
'sharedmountpoint' primary storage, and use tags to ensure that it doesn't
try to use that storage on any host other than the desired one.
Sharedmountpoint is basically telling CS that you have done the work of
mounting a clustered filesystem in a specific place.

For example, set the host with tag 'host1', the storage with tag
'host1ssd', and create a service offering with both storage tag and host
tag to select that combination. Kind of a hack, but it should work.

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Ok, waiting for someone to answer this :)

 Sent from Google Nexus 4
 On Nov 18, 2014 12:35 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:

  Andrija, but I want a more straight forward way to use the SSDs. ZFS I'm
  sure it's awesome, but it would just complicate my setup. Thanks though.
 
  --
  Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
 
  Nux!
  www.nux.ro
 
  - Original Message -
   From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
   To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Monday, 17 November, 2014 19:07:15
   Subject: Re: Multiple local storage pools?
 
   Lucian, don't relly have the answer - but did you maybe consider ZFS on
   Linux, mounted on /var/lib/libvirt/images/ - there you can add SSD for
   writings and perhaps read cache (SLOG for writes and L2ARC for
 readings)
  ?
  
   On 17 November 2014 19:37, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
  
   Hi guys,
  
   Do you know how it would be possible to add multiple local primary
  storage
   pools? I know that if local storage is enabled /var/lib/libvirt/images
  (in
   KVM's case) is added automatically.
   But assuming I want to add an SSD or SATA array to this host and want
 to
   differentiate it within cloudstack, how should I go about it?
  
   Lucian
  
   --
   Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
  
   Nux!
   www.nux.ro
  
  
  
  
   --
  
   Andrija Panić
   --
http://admintweets.com
   --
 



[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7932: Fixed wrong semantics fo...

2014-11-17 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/39#issuecomment-63432886
  
No. Because agent is reporting status of host. We cannot determine the 
status of VMs from that.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7930, CLOUDSTACK-7931: Do not ...

2014-11-17 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/41#discussion_r20489652
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java 
---
@@ -725,6 +725,21 @@ private String validateConfigurationValue(String name, 
String value, String scop
 type = c.getType();
 }
 
+String errMsg = null;
+try {
+if (type.equals(Integer.class)) {
+errMsg = There was error in trying to parse value:  + 
value + . Please enter a valid integer value for parameter  + name;
+Integer.parseInt(value);
+} else if (type.equals(Float.class)) {
+errMsg = There was error in trying to parse value:  + 
value + . Please enter a valid float value for parameter  + name;
+Float.parseFloat(value);
--- End diff --

No. Because they will fail later in parsing.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-7930, CLOUDSTACK-7931: Do not ...

2014-11-17 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/41#discussion_r20489860
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java 
---
@@ -725,6 +725,21 @@ private String validateConfigurationValue(String name, 
String value, String scop
 type = c.getType();
 }
 
+String errMsg = null;
+try {
+if (type.equals(Integer.class)) {
+errMsg = There was error in trying to parse value:  + 
value + . Please enter a valid integer value for parameter  + name;
+Integer.parseInt(value);
+} else if (type.equals(Float.class)) {
+errMsg = There was error in trying to parse value:  + 
value + . Please enter a valid float value for parameter  + name;
+Float.parseFloat(value);
+}
+} catch (Exception e) {
--- End diff --

What value will be added by catching specific exceptions?
In the end user only wants to know whether the value is valid or not. 
he/she is not concerned with what type of exception he is getting.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---