Re: Removes the use local storage for systemvms
Hi Frank, On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Rohit: I see your commit: commit d276c0faab0ac4d200714d8eb2081ed1c47f13aa Author: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Date: Mon Dec 8 21:54:31 2014 +0530 developer: increase disable thresholds global settings for developers - Increases the disable thresholds for developers - Removes the use local storage for systemvms Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com (cherry picked from commit 314e2daccccdbdc34973d039d16817d2d166) Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Is there any reason removing ' 'system.vm.use.local.storage' global setting? Is developer/developer-prefill.sql only for developers ? developer/developer-prefill.sql runs only for developers when they do deploydb using maven. This commit increases the cpu/mem/storage thresholds for developers who may be using DevCloud or related resource constraint testing platforms and removes forcing them to use local storage for systemvms (the disk space of devcloud is limited, they are using NFS for VMs anyway so not forcing it for systemvms by default). Regards.
CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI
Hi all, In our employee cloud most of our employees have their own Domain to spin up machines. Since we have 150+ domains and the lists are unsorted, it is very hard to find the one you need. The order returned by the API is the order they were added. Without any knowledge of the CloudStack UI, I decided to spend some spare time on this, to figure out a way of fixing this issue. I succeeded, as in my dev environment it now shows alphabetically ordered lists. Although, I discovered that the javascript code that does the select for the domains is on many places in the code base (25+ occurrences, with 3 or so variations). Am I supposed to fix this “ordering” on all these occurrences or am I missing something? First, I fixed it on the most obvious parts that bother us most: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/af3a7755a26e13d36a3600f16acac61085a1fa50 This I have verified works well. Then did a search and altered the others as well: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/f0a2e09df4b9887d771250dc8682739b8728952b This I still need to test/verify. Before I proceed, could you let me know if this is the way to fix it (without refactoring the whole thing into a single shared function). Thanks, Remi
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #807
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Re: Reboot of single hypervisor in zone leads to management network exhaustion
On Dec 18, 2014, at 12:43 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: I hit this with 4.4.2 and KVM. The same problem is described here by Daniel, more than a year ago. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4735 Any tips on what to remove from the DB without killing it softly? Just put the Fugees very loud and it should work :) Merry christmas. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1
+1 - Manual QA against two different public CloudStack providers and private deployment - Testing by deploying a basic zone using bash script (https://gist.github.com/bhaisaab/6b120bca5cbb4a2db732) - Manual QA to test filtering against various display formats On Monday 15 December 2014 11:40 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a 5.3.1 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master Commit: 387f0338f9715f2337a9e10c92d1c76fa5d2a381 List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-5.3.1/ PGP release keys (signed using key ID 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards. -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.3.2
+1 - Tested against DevCloud/KVM and baremetal server - Tested basic VM lifecycles, deployed basic and advanced zone as per release test procedure wiki - Manual QA isolated, shared networks and VPC - Upgraded a production ACS 4.3.1 deployment to 4.3.2, running without hiccups for last three days On Monday 15 December 2014 02:56 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a CloudStack 4.3.2 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 Commit: a15acb8e74d52bdd973f613c19dc3afd42771be4 List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.3 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS For release testing procedure, please refer: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Building from source is encouraged but for those people who are not able to build from source, a deb/rpm repository built out of this artifact is available for your test participation: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/ To encourage participation instead of the usual 72 hours window the vote will be open for 120 hours (5 days) and includes users MLs. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: ACS 4.4.1 How reinstall vm working within Xenserver 6.2.0
After changed the value of storage.cleanup.interval to 1, the volumn got expunged. --- Thanks, Yitao(依涛 姜) jiangyt.github.io On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Yitao Jiang willier...@gmail.com wrote: Yes,Removed column is null. I'll check later to see whether its still exist. --- Thanks, Yitao(依涛 姜) jiangyt.github.io On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote: Besides the state of root volume is Destroy What about the removed column for that volume? Does that have a date or it's null? Is it a bug or missing something? It might be a bug if at some point the storage GC doesn't clean up this volume. -Original Message- From: Yitao Jiang [mailto:willier...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 9:17 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: ACS 4.4.1 How reinstall vm working within Xenserver 6.2.0 Hi, I wonder how reinstall vm working now with ACS 4.4.1. I just reinstall a vm launched from template.It work successfully. But within Xencenter , There are two same Root volumes of reinstalled vm. Obviously, the former volume didn't expunged,Besides the state of root volume is Destroy Is it a bug or missing something? --- Thanks, Yitao(依涛 姜) jiangyt.github.io
Re: Reboot of single hypervisor in zone leads to management network exhaustion
Heh :-) There is a workaround, but this should get addressed in the code: if your only hypervisor is down, stop trying to spin up system vms. Any takers? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 18 December, 2014 08:52:22 Subject: Re: Reboot of single hypervisor in zone leads to management network exhaustion On Dec 18, 2014, at 12:43 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: I hit this with 4.4.2 and KVM. The same problem is described here by Daniel, more than a year ago. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4735 Any tips on what to remove from the DB without killing it softly? Just put the Fugees very loud and it should work :) Merry christmas. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Review Request 29201: CLOUDSTACK-8089: Fixed test_explicit_dedication.py test case and moved to maint folder for it is to be run separately
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29201/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8089 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8089 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This is extension of patch submitted by Saksham: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13560/diff/# Imroved the code further and also moved the test case to maint folder because it needs to be run separately. Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_explicit_dedication.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_explicit_dedication.py 71c4141 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29201/diff/ Testing --- Yes. Log: Test explicit dedication is placing vms of an account on dedicated hosts. ... === TestName: test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 258.255s OK Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
hyper-v VR does not have management network
Hi,
We use hyper-v as the hypervisor for cloudstack 4.4.1. The ssvm and cpvm
start successfully.
But the VR vm can not connect to the cloudstack management. We found that
the VR vm used guest virtual switch for the first and second network, and
public virtual switch for the third network, and several network without
virtual switch. So we checked the log in cloudstack management, and found
the parameters to create the CR vm, shown as follows:
2014-12-18 16:48:21,045 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-152:ctx-17dca502) POST response is
[{com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer:{result:true,details:null,vm:{id
:27,name:r-27-VM,type:DomainRouter,cpus:1,minSpeed:500,maxSpeed
:500,minRam:134217728,maxRam:134217728,arch:x86_64,os:Debian
GNU/Linux 5.0 (64-bit),bootArgs: template=domP name=r-27-VM
eth2ip=192.168.20.154 eth2mask=255.255.255.0 gateway=192.168.20.254
eth0ip=10.1.1.1 eth0mask=255.255.255.0 domain=cs2cloud.internal cidrsize=24
dhcprange=10.1.1.1 eth1ip=192.168.10.110 eth1mask=255.255.255.0
mgmtcidr=192.168.20.0/24 localgw=192.168.10.254 type=router
disable_rp_filter=true extra_pubnics=2 dns1=61.177.7.1 dns2=192.168.10.3
nic_macs=02:00:3d:47:00:02|02:00:40:6f:00:06|06:96:80:00:00:37|02:00:48:ab:0
0:1a|02:00:18:2f:00:1b|02:00:78:3c:00:1c|02:00:1b:aa:00:1d|02:00:79:37:00:1e
,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:true,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamical
lyScaleVm:false,vncPassword:aa9ef9b5fb278d27,params:{},uuid:af08f8
42-49a9-4c24-8eb9-9e8fb89aea7c,disks:[{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.sto
rage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volu
meType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataSto
reTO:{uuid:88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977,id:4,poolType:SMB
,host:192.168.10.6,path:/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud,port
:445,url:SMB://192.168.10.6/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud/?ROLE=Pr
imarySTOREUUID=88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977}},name:ROOT-27,si
ze:1124355072,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volumeId:28,
vmName:r-27-VM,accountId:2,format:VHD,id:28,deviceId:0,hypervi
sorType:Hyperv}},diskSeq:0,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1
,type:ROOT,_details:{managed:false,storagePort:445,storageHo
st:192.168.10.6,volumeSize:1124355072}}],nics:[{deviceId:2,netwo
rkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:true,uuid:be7dc9f2-eff8-4a7e-8229-ffb3be8f04
af,ip:192.168.20.154,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.20.25
4,mac:06:96:80:00:00:37,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broa
dcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolatio
nUri:vlan://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{de
viceId:0,networkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:false,uuid:b31abe5f-5f6d-414
3-9581-05f7ab68906a,ip:10.1.1.1,netmask:255.255.255.0,mac:02:00:
3d:47:00:02,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan
,type:Guest,broadcastUri:vlan://397,isolationUri:vlan://397,is
SecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:guest},{deviceId:1,networkRateMbps:
-1,defaultNic:false,uuid:dbc356b5-79ca-4f83-9df9-038f89290c89,ip:19
2.168.10.110,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.10.254,mac:02
:00:40:6f:00:06,broadcastType:Native,type:Control,isSecurityGroupE
nabled:false},{deviceId:3,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,ip:0
.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:02:00:
48:ab:00:1a,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan
,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolationUri:vlan://un
tagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{deviceId:4,netwo
rkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,ip:0.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255
,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:02:00:18:2f:00:1b,dns1:61.177.7.1,d
ns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:v
lan://untagged,isolationUri:vlan://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:fa
lse,name:public},{deviceId:5,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,
ip:0.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:
02:00:78:3c:00:1c,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType
:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolationUri:vla
n://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{deviceId:6,
networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,ip:0.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.25
5.255,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:02:00:1b:aa:00:1d,dns1:61.177.7
.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastU
ri:vlan://untagged,isolationUri:vlan://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabl
ed:false,name:public},{deviceId:7,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:f
alse,ip:0.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255,gateway:192.168.20.254,
mac:02:00:79:37:00:1e,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcas
tType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolationUri
:vlan://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public}]},conte
xtMap:{}}}]
Yesterday we used vmware exsi as the hypervisor for cloudstack 4.4.1. The
ssvm, cpvm and VR vm all start successfully. And we can create vm instance
in vmware exsi hosts.
Today we use the same advanced network configuration, and just change the
vmware esxi to hyper-v 2012 r2. So we also checked the “right” logs for VR
vm creating in
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #808
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Review Request 29202: CLOUDSTACK-8090: Moving test_dedicated_guest_vlan_ranges.py to maint folder for the test cases need to be run separately, serially
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29202/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8090 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8090 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The test cases need to be run separately as they create vlan ranges, and dedicated them to an account/project. In between the vlans should not get consumed by other account. Else test cases will fail like following Execute cmd: dedicateguestvlanrange failed, due to: errorCode: 431, errorText:Guest vlan from this range 3390 is allocated to a different account. Can only dedicate a range which has no allocated vlans or has vlans allocated to the same account Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_dedicate_guest_vlan_ranges.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_dedicate_guest_vlan_ranges.py 9a0e7f0 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29202/diff/ Testing --- N/A Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
RE: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI
Hi, I think sorting would be good to have, but I would not change the display format because that would remove hierarchy (as a sorting criteria). Wouldn't it be good to sort just by path? (To me sorting looks like an improvement, changing the format is more like a change that may cause problem for some.) Cheers, Gabor -Original Message- From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: 18 December 2014 08:40 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI Hi all, In our employee cloud most of our employees have their own Domain to spin up machines. Since we have 150+ domains and the lists are unsorted, it is very hard to find the one you need. The order returned by the API is the order they were added. Without any knowledge of the CloudStack UI, I decided to spend some spare time on this, to figure out a way of fixing this issue. I succeeded, as in my dev environment it now shows alphabetically ordered lists. Although, I discovered that the javascript code that does the select for the domains is on many places in the code base (25+ occurrences, with 3 or so variations). Am I supposed to fix this ordering on all these occurrences or am I missing something? First, I fixed it on the most obvious parts that bother us most: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/af3a7755a26e13d36a3600f16acac61085a1fa50 This I have verified works well. Then did a search and altered the others as well: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/f0a2e09df4b9887d771250dc8682739b8728952b This I still need to test/verify. Before I proceed, could you let me know if this is the way to fix it (without refactoring the whole thing into a single shared function). Thanks, Remi
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #809
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
merge back 4.5 to master
H devs, I submitted a fix in 4.5 that I want to merge to master in a few minutes. please stop me if you are in progress of a similar action. -- Daan
Re: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI
+1 for sorting - somwhat painfull to find domains in current situation... On 18 December 2014 at 11:35, Gabor Apati-Nagy gabor.apati-n...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, I think sorting would be good to have, but I would not change the display format because that would remove hierarchy (as a sorting criteria). Wouldn't it be good to sort just by path? (To me sorting looks like an improvement, changing the format is more like a change that may cause problem for some.) Cheers, Gabor -Original Message- From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: 18 December 2014 08:40 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI Hi all, In our employee cloud most of our employees have their own Domain to spin up machines. Since we have 150+ domains and the lists are unsorted, it is very hard to find the one you need. The order returned by the API is the order they were added. Without any knowledge of the CloudStack UI, I decided to spend some spare time on this, to figure out a way of fixing this issue. I succeeded, as in my dev environment it now shows alphabetically ordered lists. Although, I discovered that the javascript code that does the select for the domains is on many places in the code base (25+ occurrences, with 3 or so variations). Am I supposed to fix this ordering on all these occurrences or am I missing something? First, I fixed it on the most obvious parts that bother us most: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/af3a7755a26e13d36a3600f16acac61085a1fa50 This I have verified works well. Then did a search and altered the others as well: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/f0a2e09df4b9887d771250dc8682739b8728952b This I still need to test/verify. Before I proceed, could you let me know if this is the way to fix it (without refactoring the whole thing into a single shared function). Thanks, Remi -- Andrija Panić
Re: Review Request 13560: CLOUDSTACK-4021 : Update the test test_explicit_dedication.py according to new changes to dedicated resources
On Dec. 1, 2014, 3:33 a.m., Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: Is this still valid? could it be possible to resubmit a new patch from master that remove conflict? thanks Yes this is still valid. https://reviews.apache.org/r/29201/diff/ will address the issue. Closing the current review request. - Saksham --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13560/#review63331 --- On Jan. 17, 2014, 11:06 a.m., Saksham Srivastava wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13560/ --- (Updated Jan. 17, 2014, 11:06 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, Girish Shilamkar, Prachi Damle, and Rayees Namathponnan. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4021 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4021 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- test_explicit_dedication.py need to modified according to the new changes to dedicate resources feature. Now dedicate a host first and use the created affinity group to deploy vm. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_explicit_dedication.py 7aefc21 tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/common.py 550de1a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13560/diff/ Testing --- test runs successfully whenever an empty host is found. Thanks, Saksham Srivastava
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-4.5-singlerun #106
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/106/changes Changes: [Daan Hoogland] CLOUDSTACK-7184 config value for xen heartbeat timeout -- [...truncated 8608 lines...] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack DevCloud-KVM 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/ws/tools/devcloud-kvm/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/ws/tools/devcloud-kvm (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/ws/tools/devcloud-kvm/pom.xml to /var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-devcloud-kvm/4.5.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-devcloud-kvm-4.5.0-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Developer Tools - Checkstyle Configuration SUCCESS [4.597s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack . SUCCESS [3.671s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Maven Conventions Parent SUCCESS [2.167s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Managed Context . SUCCESS [5.029s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Utils ... SUCCESS [22.798s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework ... SUCCESS [0.149s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS [10.624s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Configuration ... SUCCESS [5.739s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack API . SUCCESS [24.634s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - REST SUCCESS [3.871s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - IPC . SUCCESS [6.552s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine SUCCESS [0.585s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API SUCCESS [6.301s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Security SUCCESS [3.337s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Core SUCCESS [28.959s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Agents .. SUCCESS [13.281s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Clustering .. SUCCESS [4.233s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS [2.438s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component ... SUCCESS [21.633s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Jobs SUCCESS [8.832s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Internal Components API SUCCESS [3.983s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Server .. SUCCESS [1:10.794s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Usage Server SUCCESS [12.462s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Orchestration Component SUCCESS [13.044s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Services .. SUCCESS [0.075s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage ... SUCCESS [1.483s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage Service ... SUCCESS [7.663s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Component SUCCESS [9.814s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Volume Component . SUCCESS [5.737s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Image Component .. SUCCESS [3.983s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Data Motion Component SUCCESS [3.457s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Cache Component .. SUCCESS [3.074s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Snapshot Component SUCCESS [9.645s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API SUCCESS [2.728s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Service SUCCESS [7.439s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin POM .. SUCCESS [1.112s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API Rate Limit . SUCCESS [8.486s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Storage Volume default provider SUCCESS [3.080s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Storage Volume SolidFire Provider SUCCESS [6.238s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API SolidFire .. SUCCESS [3.422s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API Discovery .. SUCCESS [6.327s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - ACL Static Role Based .. SUCCESS [3.031s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Host Anti-Affinity Processor SUCCESS [3.133s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Explicit Dedication Processor SUCCESS [3.339s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - User
Re: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI
Hi, The reason I’ve put the name upfront is because it allows for easy navigation using a keyboard. But I see your point. About the format, it is not consistent now, as most lists display the path whereas others display just the name (which is really not what you want). For example when dedicating a zone to an account. I'd suggest changing then all to the same format. As an alternative, would sorting it at the API level be better? Then we wouldn’t have to do it client side and we’d only have to change it at one place only. Regards, Remi On Dec 18, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for sorting - somwhat painfull to find domains in current situation... On 18 December 2014 at 11:35, Gabor Apati-Nagy gabor.apati-n...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, I think sorting would be good to have, but I would not change the display format because that would remove hierarchy (as a sorting criteria). Wouldn't it be good to sort just by path? (To me sorting looks like an improvement, changing the format is more like a change that may cause problem for some.) Cheers, Gabor -Original Message- From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: 18 December 2014 08:40 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI Hi all, In our employee cloud most of our employees have their own Domain to spin up machines. Since we have 150+ domains and the lists are unsorted, it is very hard to find the one you need. The order returned by the API is the order they were added. Without any knowledge of the CloudStack UI, I decided to spend some spare time on this, to figure out a way of fixing this issue. I succeeded, as in my dev environment it now shows alphabetically ordered lists. Although, I discovered that the javascript code that does the select for the domains is on many places in the code base (25+ occurrences, with 3 or so variations). Am I supposed to fix this ordering on all these occurrences or am I missing something? First, I fixed it on the most obvious parts that bother us most: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/af3a7755a26e13d36a3600f16acac61085a1fa50 This I have verified works well. Then did a search and altered the others as well: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/f0a2e09df4b9887d771250dc8682739b8728952b This I still need to test/verify. Before I proceed, could you let me know if this is the way to fix it (without refactoring the whole thing into a single shared function). Thanks, Remi -- Andrija Panić
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #810
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/810/changes Changes: [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8053: Fix loop termination - test_vpc_host_maintenance.py [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8049: Tagging test cases which cannot be run on simulator accordingly [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8048: Fix test_ss_limits.py [jayapal] CLOUDSTACK-8030: Updated router to come up egress default ALLOW [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7974: remove old hostname entry for a VM when adding a VM [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8057: test_dedicate_guest_vlan_range.py - Marking a test as invalid [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8059: test_host_high_availability.py - Adding necessary code to check the hosts in cluster and update the host with appropriate tags to make it HA enabled [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-8014: Fix NPE searching including removed templates [w.zhou] CLOUDSTACK-2823: pass cmdline info to system vms for 30 times [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8062: test_multiple_ip_ranges.py - Fix the test case to avoid using same vlan IP range in each test case [talluri] CLOUDSTACK:8018: Fix test_redundant_router.test_redundantVR_internals - The SSH to router was being done from wrong host [talluri] CLOUDSTACK:8058: Fix test_reset_ssh_keypair.py for EIP setup [min.chen] CLOUDSTACK-8061: Extracting volume when it is in migrating state causes [w.zhou] CLOUDSTACK-255: fix NPE in createPortForwardingRule due to no PortForwarding provider [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8055: Tagging test cases which can't be run on simulator accordingly [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8068: Fixing test script issue in test_ps_project_limits.py [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8055: Tagging test cases which can't be run on simulator accordingly [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8069: Fixed test script in test_tags.py [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-8067: Fixed NPEs in MS log related to console proxy VM [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-8070: Upgrade router.ram.size using encryption util [jayapal] CLOUDSTACK-8072: Fixed NPE in deleting default ACL items in default ACL [mike.tutkowski] When deleting primary storage that's based on the SolidFireShared plug-in (which uses a shared-IOPS approach), remove the volume from the volume access group it's in [Daan Hoogland] use directIO flags when dd'ing template [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-8076: UI Templates menu Template/ISO Filter by dropdown add a new option, shared, which will list shared templates when being selected. [brian.federle] CLOUDSTACK-8075: Front-end support for shared templates/ISOs [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-8075: UI Instances menu Add Instance Select template/ISO add a new tab shared which will list shared templates/ISOs when being clicked. [min.chen] CLOUDSTACK-8077: Not able to deploy VM using a shared template. [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8074: Fixed maint/test_multiple_ip_ranges.py [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8081: Fixed VM snapshot test cases in test_escalation_instances.py and also dealt cleanup issues [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8055: test_portable_ip.py - Tagging test case which can't be run on simulator [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8071: Fixed api key issue in test_snapshots_improvement.py [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-8075: UI Instances menu Add Instance Select template/ISO shared tab select a shared template, click Next button = fix error unable to find matched template object. [prachi.damle] CLOUDSTACK-8079: If the cluster capacity threshold is reached, HA-enabled VM is not migrated on another host during HA [prachi.damle] CLOUDSTACK-8078: [Automation] Deletion of Affinity Groups - CloudRuntimeException: No Event Pubish can be wrapped within DB Transaction! [prachi.damle] CLOUDSTACK-8022: [Automation] Deletion of Domain with Cleanup set to true fails [sudison] add event for volume migration [sudison] if local storage is in maitenance mode or removed, won't change its [sudison] if concurrent snapshot happening on the same vm, throw invalid parameter [Daan Hoogland] CLOUDSTACK-7184 config value for xen heartbeat timeout -- [...truncated 8728 lines...] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack DevCloud-KVM 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/tools/devcloud-kvm/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/tools/devcloud-kvm (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] Installing
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #811
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/811/changes Changes: [saksham.srivastava] CLOUDSTACK-8091: Stale entry exists for a VM NIC even after an exception while adding a new nic to vm -- [...truncated 8733 lines...] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack DevCloud-KVM 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/tools/devcloud-kvm/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/tools/devcloud-kvm (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/tools/devcloud-kvm/pom.xml to /var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-devcloud-kvm/4.6.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-devcloud-kvm-4.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Developer Tools - Checkstyle Configuration SUCCESS [2.622s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack . SUCCESS [2.569s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Maven Conventions Parent SUCCESS [0.961s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Managed Context . SUCCESS [4.498s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Utils ... SUCCESS [22.028s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework ... SUCCESS [0.071s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS [10.538s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Configuration ... SUCCESS [5.935s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack API . SUCCESS [22.621s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - REST SUCCESS [3.521s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - IPC . SUCCESS [6.015s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine SUCCESS [0.056s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API SUCCESS [7.256s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Security SUCCESS [3.582s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Core SUCCESS [29.869s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Agents .. SUCCESS [9.384s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Clustering .. SUCCESS [5.150s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS [2.857s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component ... SUCCESS [21.000s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Jobs SUCCESS [8.038s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Internal Components API SUCCESS [4.185s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Server .. SUCCESS [59.616s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Usage Server SUCCESS [9.977s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Orchestration Component SUCCESS [13.084s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Services .. SUCCESS [0.047s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage ... SUCCESS [0.412s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage Service ... SUCCESS [7.600s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Component SUCCESS [10.040s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Volume Component . SUCCESS [5.909s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Image Component .. SUCCESS [4.175s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Data Motion Component SUCCESS [3.872s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Cache Component .. SUCCESS [3.639s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Snapshot Component SUCCESS [9.767s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API SUCCESS [2.582s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Service SUCCESS [7.042s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin POM .. SUCCESS [1.363s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API Rate Limit . SUCCESS [9.051s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Storage Volume default provider SUCCESS [3.070s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Storage Volume SolidFire Provider SUCCESS [6.800s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API SolidFire .. SUCCESS [3.700s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API Discovery .. SUCCESS [6.019s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - ACL Static Role Based .. SUCCESS [2.827s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Host Anti-Affinity Processor SUCCESS [2.987s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Explicit Dedication Processor SUCCESS [3.618s] [INFO] Apache
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.3.2
+1 (binding) Tested with devcloud4/xenserver 6.2 On 18 Dec 2014 09:04, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: +1 - Tested against DevCloud/KVM and baremetal server - Tested basic VM lifecycles, deployed basic and advanced zone as per release test procedure wiki - Manual QA isolated, shared networks and VPC - Upgraded a production ACS 4.3.1 deployment to 4.3.2, running without hiccups for last three days On Monday 15 December 2014 02:56 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a CloudStack 4.3.2 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a= shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 Commit: a15acb8e74d52bdd973f613c19dc3afd42771be4 List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a= blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.3 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS For release testing procedure, please refer: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/ Release+test+procedure Building from source is encouraged but for those people who are not able to build from source, a deb/rpm repository built out of this artifact is available for your test participation: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/ To encourage participation instead of the usual 72 hours window the vote will be open for 120 hours (5 days) and includes users MLs. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/ iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/ cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.3.2
+1 Tested VM lifecycle Deployed advanced zone w/o sec group with single XenServer Volume and VM snapshots for XenServer Account creation and deletion Storage tags Have been running 4.3 for around 4 days without issues. -abhi On 18-Dec-2014, at 2:33 pm, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: +1 - Tested against DevCloud/KVM and baremetal server - Tested basic VM lifecycles, deployed basic and advanced zone as per release test procedure wiki - Manual QA isolated, shared networks and VPC - Upgraded a production ACS 4.3.1 deployment to 4.3.2, running without hiccups for last three days On Monday 15 December 2014 02:56 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a CloudStack 4.3.2 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 Commit: a15acb8e74d52bdd973f613c19dc3afd42771be4 List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.3 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS For release testing procedure, please refer: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Building from source is encouraged but for those people who are not able to build from source, a deb/rpm repository built out of this artifact is available for your test participation: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/ To encourage participation instead of the usual 72 hours window the vote will be open for 120 hours (5 days) and includes users MLs. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #812
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/812/ -- [...truncated 8730 lines...] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack DevCloud-KVM 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/tools/devcloud-kvm/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/tools/devcloud-kvm (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-devcloud-kvm --- [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/tools/devcloud-kvm/pom.xml to /var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-devcloud-kvm/4.6.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-devcloud-kvm-4.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Developer Tools - Checkstyle Configuration SUCCESS [2.770s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack . SUCCESS [5.145s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Maven Conventions Parent SUCCESS [2.235s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Managed Context . SUCCESS [8.328s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Utils ... SUCCESS [22.556s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework ... SUCCESS [0.080s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS [10.273s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Configuration ... SUCCESS [5.877s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack API . SUCCESS [22.201s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - REST SUCCESS [3.462s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - IPC . SUCCESS [5.882s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine SUCCESS [0.059s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API SUCCESS [7.178s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Security SUCCESS [3.353s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Core SUCCESS [28.382s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Agents .. SUCCESS [9.475s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Clustering .. SUCCESS [4.275s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification .. SUCCESS [2.822s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component ... SUCCESS [20.135s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Framework - Jobs SUCCESS [9.033s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Internal Components API SUCCESS [3.907s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Server .. SUCCESS [1:05.405s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Usage Server SUCCESS [9.108s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Orchestration Component SUCCESS [13.031s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Services .. SUCCESS [0.048s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage ... SUCCESS [0.340s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Secondary Storage Service ... SUCCESS [7.286s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Component SUCCESS [9.703s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Volume Component . SUCCESS [6.277s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Image Component .. SUCCESS [3.994s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Data Motion Component SUCCESS [3.603s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Cache Component .. SUCCESS [3.316s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Snapshot Component SUCCESS [9.701s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API SUCCESS [2.941s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Service SUCCESS [6.476s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin POM .. SUCCESS [1.692s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API Rate Limit . SUCCESS [8.581s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Storage Volume default provider SUCCESS [3.411s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Storage Volume SolidFire Provider SUCCESS [7.351s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API SolidFire .. SUCCESS [3.253s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - API Discovery .. SUCCESS [5.824s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - ACL Static Role Based .. SUCCESS [3.577s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Host Anti-Affinity Processor SUCCESS [3.115s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Explicit Dedication Processor SUCCESS [3.133s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - User Concentrated Pod Deployment Planner SUCCESS [3.163s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - User Dispersing Deployment
Re: Deploy new VM - click on Finish - nothing happens !
Well, yes! Аfter an attempt to create a VM, in the Web console appears - the element is not found. Thanks! 2014-12-17 17:11 GMT+03:00 Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com: Alex, After you have the error - please imiddiately right-click anywehre on page -- inspect element, switch to CONSOLE tab, and there you should see your error together with URL executed - so if you can confirm the error that I have - that would be great. thx On 17 December 2014 at 15:07, Alexey Samarin nrg3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I also have this bug, and if create vm from the user admin - no problem. But when I try to create the VM as a regular user - nothing happens, nothing in the logs also. CS version: 4.4.1 Thanks! 2014-12-17 14:31 GMT+03:00 Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com: I've responded on the ticket. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 December 2014 09:28 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Deploy new VM - click on Finish - nothing happens ! Hi, I managed to capture some (bug?) - you start new VM wizard, click all the way through the end, and after pressing the FINISH button - simply nothing happens, no spining weel in UI, nothing... Here is my comment - please check this - seems pretty annoying for end user... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7907?focusedCommentId=14249648page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14249648 Thanks -- Andrija Panić -- Andrija Panić
Re: Deploy new VM - click on Finish - nothing happens !
Hi, I also have this bug, and if create vm from the user admin - no problem. But when I try to create the VM as a regular user - nothing happens, nothing in the logs also. CS version: 4.4.1 Thanks! 2014-12-17 14:31 GMT+03:00 Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com: I've responded on the ticket. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 December 2014 09:28 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Deploy new VM - click on Finish - nothing happens ! Hi, I managed to capture some (bug?) - you start new VM wizard, click all the way through the end, and after pressing the FINISH button - simply nothing happens, no spining weel in UI, nothing... Here is my comment - please check this - seems pretty annoying for end user... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7907?focusedCommentId=14249648page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14249648 Thanks -- Andrija Panić
RE: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Are you using traffic lables?
Hyperv will work only in dedicated zone only , you cannot replace esx host with
hyperv host and make the zone to work.
There are no issues with VR to run on Hyperv. It works well.
If you are using traffic lables, make sure the traffic lable matches to vswitch
name on the hyperv host. If there is not matching vswitch name it can fail
creating the VM.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: 穆凯辉 [mailto:k...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 3:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Hi,
We use hyper-v as the hypervisor for cloudstack 4.4.1. The ssvm and cpvm start
successfully.
But the VR vm can not connect to the cloudstack management. We found that the
VR vm used guest virtual switch for the first and second network, and public
virtual switch for the third network, and several network without virtual
switch. So we checked the log in cloudstack management, and found the
parameters to create the CR vm, shown as follows:
2014-12-18 16:48:21,045 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-152:ctx-17dca502) POST response is
[{com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer:{result:true,details:null,vm:{id
:27,name:r-27-VM,type:DomainRouter,cpus:1,minSpeed:500,maxSpeed
:500,minRam:134217728,maxRam:134217728,arch:x86_64,os:Debian
GNU/Linux 5.0 (64-bit),bootArgs: template=domP name=r-27-VM
eth2ip=192.168.20.154 eth2mask=255.255.255.0 gateway=192.168.20.254
eth0ip=10.1.1.1 eth0mask=255.255.255.0 domain=cs2cloud.internal cidrsize=24
dhcprange=10.1.1.1 eth1ip=192.168.10.110 eth1mask=255.255.255.0
mgmtcidr=192.168.20.0/24 localgw=192.168.10.254 type=router
disable_rp_filter=true extra_pubnics=2 dns1=61.177.7.1 dns2=192.168.10.3
nic_macs=02:00:3d:47:00:02|02:00:40:6f:00:06|06:96:80:00:00:37|02:00:48:ab:0
0:1a|02:00:18:2f:00:1b|02:00:78:3c:00:1c|02:00:1b:aa:00:1d|02:00:79:37:00:1e
,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:true,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamical
lyScaleVm:false,vncPassword:aa9ef9b5fb278d27,params:{},uuid:af08f8
42-49a9-4c24-8eb9-9e8fb89aea7c,disks:[{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.sto
rage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volu
meType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataSto
reTO:{uuid:88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977,id:4,poolType:SMB
,host:192.168.10.6,path:/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud,port
:445,url:SMB://192.168.10.6/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud/?ROLE=Pr
imarySTOREUUID=88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977}},name:ROOT-27,si
ze:1124355072,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volumeId:28,
vmName:r-27-VM,accountId:2,format:VHD,id:28,deviceId:0,hypervi
sorType:Hyperv}},diskSeq:0,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1
,type:ROOT,_details:{managed:false,storagePort:445,storageHo
st:192.168.10.6,volumeSize:1124355072}}],nics:[{deviceId:2,netwo
rkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:true,uuid:be7dc9f2-eff8-4a7e-8229-ffb3be8f04
af,ip:192.168.20.154,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.20.25
4,mac:06:96:80:00:00:37,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broa
dcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolatio
nUri:vlan://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{de
viceId:0,networkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:false,uuid:b31abe5f-5f6d-414
3-9581-05f7ab68906a,ip:10.1.1.1,netmask:255.255.255.0,mac:02:00:
3d:47:00:02,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan
,type:Guest,broadcastUri:vlan://397,isolationUri:vlan://397,is
SecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:guest},{deviceId:1,networkRateMbps:
-1,defaultNic:false,uuid:dbc356b5-79ca-4f83-9df9-038f89290c89,ip:19
2.168.10.110,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.10.254,mac:02
:00:40:6f:00:06,broadcastType:Native,type:Control,isSecurityGroupE
nabled:false},{deviceId:3,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,ip:0
.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:02:00:
48:ab:00:1a,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan
,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolationUri:vlan://un
tagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{deviceId:4,netwo
rkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,ip:0.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255
,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:02:00:18:2f:00:1b,dns1:61.177.7.1,d
ns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:v
lan://untagged,isolationUri:vlan://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:fa
lse,name:public},{deviceId:5,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,
ip:0.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:
02:00:78:3c:00:1c,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType
:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolationUri:vla
n://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{deviceId:6,
networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,ip:0.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.25
5.255,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:02:00:1b:aa:00:1d,dns1:61.177.7
.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastU
ri:vlan://untagged,isolationUri:vlan://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabl
ed:false,name:public},{deviceId:7,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:f
Jenkins build is unstable: simulator-singlerun #813
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/813/changes
RE: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI
My point here is: unless the API supported sorting as a parameter, we should not rely on any expected sorting done by the API. It is really the presentation layer's job to show the results in an order it wants to. So instead of changing the API, I would suggest let's just sort it at UI side. I see why sorting by name would be good in some cases, but if the same names exist in different domains it could easily become confusing. Or it can be even more confusing if someone tries to find something by hierarchy - not knowing it's exact name, but knowing where it should be. As a future feature, there could be a browse domains or similar selector where a popup could show them in a searchable grid or similar where users could search by name for instance. So I am +1 for sorting at UI side and -1 for changing to Name (Path) format. And +1 for having the same format everywhere. Thanks, Gabor -Original Message- From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: 18 December 2014 12:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI Hi, The reason I’ve put the name upfront is because it allows for easy navigation using a keyboard. But I see your point. About the format, it is not consistent now, as most lists display the path whereas others display just the name (which is really not what you want). For example when dedicating a zone to an account. I'd suggest changing then all to the same format. As an alternative, would sorting it at the API level be better? Then we wouldn’t have to do it client side and we’d only have to change it at one place only. Regards, Remi On Dec 18, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for sorting - somwhat painfull to find domains in current situation... On 18 December 2014 at 11:35, Gabor Apati-Nagy gabor.apati-n...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, I think sorting would be good to have, but I would not change the display format because that would remove hierarchy (as a sorting criteria). Wouldn't it be good to sort just by path? (To me sorting looks like an improvement, changing the format is more like a change that may cause problem for some.) Cheers, Gabor -Original Message- From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: 18 December 2014 08:40 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI Hi all, In our employee cloud most of our employees have their own Domain to spin up machines. Since we have 150+ domains and the lists are unsorted, it is very hard to find the one you need. The order returned by the API is the order they were added. Without any knowledge of the CloudStack UI, I decided to spend some spare time on this, to figure out a way of fixing this issue. I succeeded, as in my dev environment it now shows alphabetically ordered lists. Although, I discovered that the javascript code that does the select for the domains is on many places in the code base (25+ occurrences, with 3 or so variations). Am I supposed to fix this ordering on all these occurrences or am I missing something? First, I fixed it on the most obvious parts that bother us most: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/af3a7755a26e13d36a36 00f16acac61085a1fa50 This I have verified works well. Then did a search and altered the others as well: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/f0a2e09df4b9887d7712 50dc8682739b8728952b This I still need to test/verify. Before I proceed, could you let me know if this is the way to fix it (without refactoring the whole thing into a single shared function). Thanks, Remi -- Andrija Panić
Jenkins build is unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #107
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/107/changes
Add Storage Network
During initial deployment we went with a simpler network design by letting secondary storage traffic run over the management network. We would like to offload secondary storage to a separate network, and are trying to figure out the best method of doing so. Based on the recommendations in the documentation we would need to add a new Physical Network, and add the Storage traffic type to that network. Could we instead just add a new traffic type to the existing network, just set up the specified VLAN + Storage subnet on a separate NIC on the hypervisor? For Primary Storage the NIC used is just determined by the hypervisor's routing table, so wouldn't it work the same for the secondary storage network, or is there a reason it should be added as a separate Physical Network in CloudStack?
Re: Add Storage Network
My guess is that you're right. I haven't seen anything that ties the 'physical network' to a specific NIC, thus if you register the traffic type it should work so long as the hosts are able to route to that subnet on *any* NIC. I'm not sure what hypervisor you're using, but for KVM at least, you've also got to think about the bridge that SSVMs will want to attach to. This is determined by bridge name (traffic label), and I believe if it is set up in advance on the hosts it won't try to bridge to the primary interface. On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com wrote: During initial deployment we went with a simpler network design by letting secondary storage traffic run over the management network. We would like to offload secondary storage to a separate network, and are trying to figure out the best method of doing so. Based on the recommendations in the documentation we would need to add a new Physical Network, and add the Storage traffic type to that network. Could we instead just add a new traffic type to the existing network, just set up the specified VLAN + Storage subnet on a separate NIC on the hypervisor? For Primary Storage the NIC used is just determined by the hypervisor's routing table, so wouldn't it work the same for the secondary storage network, or is there a reason it should be added as a separate Physical Network in CloudStack?
Re: CLOUDSTACK-7117
ok, pity I see that 7117 is related to 7112 but that doesn't seem right to me. This was closed, reopened and closed again so if it is related I think you hit a bug that has intermittent behavior. I saw the same log as the one in 7117 but mine was on the real side of the keyboard. You better edit this tickets or add one. You can check any of the tomcat conf files to see if changes there are in your way. On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Daniel Mezentsev d...@soleks.com wrote: Daan, in my sudoers file i have cloud ALL =NOPASSWD : ALL so it's pretty much like root i didn't run cloudstack-setup-management because i was trying to do upgrade, and i can't remove zone (advanced) from my config, it's in production. On the other hand i don't see updates in regards to that issue. Daniel, I hit this bug as well setting up a new env based on 4.4.2 as well but it turned out I hadn't ran cloudstack-setup-management succesfuly. Can you check that? the issue I think is in the setup of the sudo rights. check if the line at the botom of the sudoers file on the ms reads something like cloud ALL =NOPASSWD : /bin/chmod, /bin/cp, /bin/mkdir, /bin/mount, /bin/umount, /usr/bin/keytool regards, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Daniel Mezentsev d...@soleks.com wrote: After upgrade 4.2.1-4.4.2 i hit that bug. On JIRA it's marked as resolved, but for version 4.5.0. Can somebody gimme heads-up what is the status of this bug for 4.4.2. Daniel Mezentsev, founder (+1) 604 313 8592. Soleks Data Group. Shaping the clouds. --Daan Daniel Mezentsev, founder (+1) 604 313 8592. Soleks Data Group. Shaping the clouds. -- Daan
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #814
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Re: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI
+1 on GUI-side sorting (ideally it would be nice if we could sort by clicking a column header in a table...maybe some reasonable column header would be selected by default for each table) On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Gabor Apati-Nagy gabor.apati-n...@citrix.com wrote: My point here is: unless the API supported sorting as a parameter, we should not rely on any expected sorting done by the API. It is really the presentation layer's job to show the results in an order it wants to. So instead of changing the API, I would suggest let's just sort it at UI side. I see why sorting by name would be good in some cases, but if the same names exist in different domains it could easily become confusing. Or it can be even more confusing if someone tries to find something by hierarchy - not knowing it's exact name, but knowing where it should be. As a future feature, there could be a browse domains or similar selector where a popup could show them in a searchable grid or similar where users could search by name for instance. So I am +1 for sorting at UI side and -1 for changing to Name (Path) format. And +1 for having the same format everywhere. Thanks, Gabor -Original Message- From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com javascript:;] Sent: 18 December 2014 12:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:; Subject: Re: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI Hi, The reason I’ve put the name upfront is because it allows for easy navigation using a keyboard. But I see your point. About the format, it is not consistent now, as most lists display the path whereas others display just the name (which is really not what you want). For example when dedicating a zone to an account. I'd suggest changing then all to the same format. As an alternative, would sorting it at the API level be better? Then we wouldn’t have to do it client side and we’d only have to change it at one place only. Regards, Remi On Dec 18, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: +1 for sorting - somwhat painfull to find domains in current situation... On 18 December 2014 at 11:35, Gabor Apati-Nagy gabor.apati-n...@citrix.com javascript:; wrote: Hi, I think sorting would be good to have, but I would not change the display format because that would remove hierarchy (as a sorting criteria). Wouldn't it be good to sort just by path? (To me sorting looks like an improvement, changing the format is more like a change that may cause problem for some.) Cheers, Gabor -Original Message- From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com javascript:;] Sent: 18 December 2014 08:40 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:; Subject: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI Hi all, In our employee cloud most of our employees have their own Domain to spin up machines. Since we have 150+ domains and the lists are unsorted, it is very hard to find the one you need. The order returned by the API is the order they were added. Without any knowledge of the CloudStack UI, I decided to spend some spare time on this, to figure out a way of fixing this issue. I succeeded, as in my dev environment it now shows alphabetically ordered lists. Although, I discovered that the javascript code that does the select for the domains is on many places in the code base (25+ occurrences, with 3 or so variations). Am I supposed to fix this ordering on all these occurrences or am I missing something? First, I fixed it on the most obvious parts that bother us most: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/af3a7755a26e13d36a36 00f16acac61085a1fa50 This I have verified works well. Then did a search and altered the others as well: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/f0a2e09df4b9887d7712 50dc8682739b8728952b This I still need to test/verify. Before I proceed, could you let me know if this is the way to fix it (without refactoring the whole thing into a single shared function). Thanks, Remi -- Andrija Panić -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: Add Storage Network
Thanks for the confirmation. I probably won't get around to actually messing with it until January, so maybe someone else will chime in for more verification. Thank You, Logan Barfield Tranquil Hosting On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote: My guess is that you're right. I haven't seen anything that ties the 'physical network' to a specific NIC, thus if you register the traffic type it should work so long as the hosts are able to route to that subnet on *any* NIC. I'm not sure what hypervisor you're using, but for KVM at least, you've also got to think about the bridge that SSVMs will want to attach to. This is determined by bridge name (traffic label), and I believe if it is set up in advance on the hosts it won't try to bridge to the primary interface. On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com wrote: During initial deployment we went with a simpler network design by letting secondary storage traffic run over the management network. We would like to offload secondary storage to a separate network, and are trying to figure out the best method of doing so. Based on the recommendations in the documentation we would need to add a new Physical Network, and add the Storage traffic type to that network. Could we instead just add a new traffic type to the existing network, just set up the specified VLAN + Storage subnet on a separate NIC on the hypervisor? For Primary Storage the NIC used is just determined by the hypervisor's routing table, so wouldn't it work the same for the secondary storage network, or is there a reason it should be added as a separate Physical Network in CloudStack?
maven run doesn't log to vmops.log anymore
H devs, Did anybody decide not to log to vmops.log anymore. A lot of trace log (from the hyperv module) is coming to the console but the log4j config there hasn't changed so someone made sure it is used instead of the default one. anyone? -- Daan
RE: Removes the use local storage for systemvms
Alright, so it won't affect customer From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:bhais...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 12:17 AM To: Frank Zhang Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Removes the use local storage for systemvms Hi Frank, On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.commailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Rohit: I see your commit: commit d276c0faab0ac4d200714d8eb2081ed1c47f13aa Author: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Date: Mon Dec 8 21:54:31 2014 +0530 developer: increase disable thresholds global settings for developers - Increases the disable thresholds for developers - Removes the use local storage for systemvms Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com (cherry picked from commit 314e2daccccdbdc34973d039d16817d2d166) Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Is there any reason removing ' 'system.vm.use.local.storage' global setting? Is developer/developer-prefill.sql only for developers ? developer/developer-prefill.sql runs only for developers when they do deploydb using maven. This commit increases the cpu/mem/storage thresholds for developers who may be using DevCloud or related resource constraint testing platforms and removes forcing them to use local storage for systemvms (the disk space of devcloud is limited, they are using NFS for VMs anyway so not forcing it for systemvms by default). Regards.
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #815
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #816
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #108
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.3.2
+1 (binding) Checked: -signatures -diff with git and reset on commit of rc -RAT -build -simulator smoke tests On Dec 18, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Abhinandan Prateek abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote: +1 Tested VM lifecycle Deployed advanced zone w/o sec group with single XenServer Volume and VM snapshots for XenServer Account creation and deletion Storage tags Have been running 4.3 for around 4 days without issues. -abhi On 18-Dec-2014, at 2:33 pm, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: +1 - Tested against DevCloud/KVM and baremetal server - Tested basic VM lifecycles, deployed basic and advanced zone as per release test procedure wiki - Manual QA isolated, shared networks and VPC - Upgraded a production ACS 4.3.1 deployment to 4.3.2, running without hiccups for last three days On Monday 15 December 2014 02:56 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi All, I've created a CloudStack 4.3.2 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 Commit: a15acb8e74d52bdd973f613c19dc3afd42771be4 List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.3 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.2/ PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS For release testing procedure, please refer: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Building from source is encouraged but for those people who are not able to build from source, a deb/rpm repository built out of this artifact is available for your test participation: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/ To encourage participation instead of the usual 72 hours window the vote will be open for 120 hours (5 days) and includes users MLs. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav -- Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you
答复: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Besides the zone for vmware esxi, we set up another zone for hyper-v with
windows smb for primary and secondary storage.
We use three lables for management, public and guest networks. The cpvm and
ssvm also have the correct management lable for management network traffic.
We set trunk port for the guest network in physical switch, access ports for
the management and public network traffic.
The traffic lables also match the virtual switch names in hyper-v host.
Thank you very much.
khmu
-邮件原件-
发件人: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
发送时间: 2014年12月18日 22:17
收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: RE: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Are you using traffic lables?
Hyperv will work only in dedicated zone only , you cannot replace esx host
with hyperv host and make the zone to work.
There are no issues with VR to run on Hyperv. It works well.
If you are using traffic lables, make sure the traffic lable matches to
vswitch name on the hyperv host. If there is not matching vswitch name it
can fail creating the VM.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: 穆凯辉 [mailto:k...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 3:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Hi,
We use hyper-v as the hypervisor for cloudstack 4.4.1. The ssvm and cpvm
start successfully.
But the VR vm can not connect to the cloudstack management. We found that
the VR vm used guest virtual switch for the first and second network, and
public virtual switch for the third network, and several network without
virtual switch. So we checked the log in cloudstack management, and found
the parameters to create the CR vm, shown as follows:
2014-12-18 16:48:21,045 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-152:ctx-17dca502) POST response is
[{com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer:{result:true,details:null,vm:{id
:27,name:r-27-VM,type:DomainRouter,cpus:1,minSpeed:500,maxSpeed
:500,minRam:134217728,maxRam:134217728,arch:x86_64,os:Debian
GNU/Linux 5.0 (64-bit),bootArgs: template=domP name=r-27-VM
eth2ip=192.168.20.154 eth2mask=255.255.255.0 gateway=192.168.20.254
eth0ip=10.1.1.1 eth0mask=255.255.255.0 domain=cs2cloud.internal cidrsize=24
dhcprange=10.1.1.1 eth1ip=192.168.10.110 eth1mask=255.255.255.0
mgmtcidr=192.168.20.0/24 localgw=192.168.10.254 type=router
disable_rp_filter=true extra_pubnics=2 dns1=61.177.7.1 dns2=192.168.10.3
nic_macs=02:00:3d:47:00:02|02:00:40:6f:00:06|06:96:80:00:00:37|02:00:48:ab:0
0:1a|02:00:18:2f:00:1b|02:00:78:3c:00:1c|02:00:1b:aa:00:1d|02:00:79:37:00:1e
,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:true,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamical
lyScaleVm:false,vncPassword:aa9ef9b5fb278d27,params:{},uuid:af08f8
42-49a9-4c24-8eb9-9e8fb89aea7c,disks:[{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.sto
rage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volu
meType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataSto
reTO:{uuid:88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977,id:4,poolType:SMB
,host:192.168.10.6,path:/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud,port
:445,url:SMB://192.168.10.6/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud/?ROLE=Pr
imarySTOREUUID=88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977}},name:ROOT-27,si
ze:1124355072,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volumeId:28,
vmName:r-27-VM,accountId:2,format:VHD,id:28,deviceId:0,hypervi
sorType:Hyperv}},diskSeq:0,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1
,type:ROOT,_details:{managed:false,storagePort:445,storageHo
st:192.168.10.6,volumeSize:1124355072}}],nics:[{deviceId:2,netwo
rkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:true,uuid:be7dc9f2-eff8-4a7e-8229-ffb3be8f04
af,ip:192.168.20.154,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.20.25
4,mac:06:96:80:00:00:37,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broa
dcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolatio
nUri:vlan://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{de
viceId:0,networkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:false,uuid:b31abe5f-5f6d-414
3-9581-05f7ab68906a,ip:10.1.1.1,netmask:255.255.255.0,mac:02:00:
3d:47:00:02,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan
,type:Guest,broadcastUri:vlan://397,isolationUri:vlan://397,is
SecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:guest},{deviceId:1,networkRateMbps:
-1,defaultNic:false,uuid:dbc356b5-79ca-4f83-9df9-038f89290c89,ip:19
2.168.10.110,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.10.254,mac:02
:00:40:6f:00:06,broadcastType:Native,type:Control,isSecurityGroupE
nabled:false},{deviceId:3,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,ip:0
.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:02:00:
48:ab:00:1a,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan
,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolationUri:vlan://un
tagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{deviceId:4,netwo
rkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,ip:0.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255
,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:02:00:18:2f:00:1b,dns1:61.177.7.1,d
ns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:v
答复: hyper-v VR does not have management network
We also check the cloud agent status in VR vm, the process of which also
exists in VR.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
发送时间: 2014年12月18日 22:17
收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: RE: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Are you using traffic lables?
Hyperv will work only in dedicated zone only , you cannot replace esx host
with hyperv host and make the zone to work.
There are no issues with VR to run on Hyperv. It works well.
If you are using traffic lables, make sure the traffic lable matches to
vswitch name on the hyperv host. If there is not matching vswitch name it
can fail creating the VM.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: 穆凯辉 [mailto:k...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 3:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Hi,
We use hyper-v as the hypervisor for cloudstack 4.4.1. The ssvm and cpvm
start successfully.
But the VR vm can not connect to the cloudstack management. We found that
the VR vm used guest virtual switch for the first and second network, and
public virtual switch for the third network, and several network without
virtual switch. So we checked the log in cloudstack management, and found
the parameters to create the CR vm, shown as follows:
2014-12-18 16:48:21,045 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-152:ctx-17dca502) POST response is
[{com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer:{result:true,details:null,vm:{id
:27,name:r-27-VM,type:DomainRouter,cpus:1,minSpeed:500,maxSpeed
:500,minRam:134217728,maxRam:134217728,arch:x86_64,os:Debian
GNU/Linux 5.0 (64-bit),bootArgs: template=domP name=r-27-VM
eth2ip=192.168.20.154 eth2mask=255.255.255.0 gateway=192.168.20.254
eth0ip=10.1.1.1 eth0mask=255.255.255.0 domain=cs2cloud.internal cidrsize=24
dhcprange=10.1.1.1 eth1ip=192.168.10.110 eth1mask=255.255.255.0
mgmtcidr=192.168.20.0/24 localgw=192.168.10.254 type=router
disable_rp_filter=true extra_pubnics=2 dns1=61.177.7.1 dns2=192.168.10.3
nic_macs=02:00:3d:47:00:02|02:00:40:6f:00:06|06:96:80:00:00:37|02:00:48:ab:0
0:1a|02:00:18:2f:00:1b|02:00:78:3c:00:1c|02:00:1b:aa:00:1d|02:00:79:37:00:1e
,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:true,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamical
lyScaleVm:false,vncPassword:aa9ef9b5fb278d27,params:{},uuid:af08f8
42-49a9-4c24-8eb9-9e8fb89aea7c,disks:[{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.sto
rage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volu
meType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataSto
reTO:{uuid:88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977,id:4,poolType:SMB
,host:192.168.10.6,path:/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud,port
:445,url:SMB://192.168.10.6/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud/?ROLE=Pr
imarySTOREUUID=88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977}},name:ROOT-27,si
ze:1124355072,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volumeId:28,
vmName:r-27-VM,accountId:2,format:VHD,id:28,deviceId:0,hypervi
sorType:Hyperv}},diskSeq:0,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1
,type:ROOT,_details:{managed:false,storagePort:445,storageHo
st:192.168.10.6,volumeSize:1124355072}}],nics:[{deviceId:2,netwo
rkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:true,uuid:be7dc9f2-eff8-4a7e-8229-ffb3be8f04
af,ip:192.168.20.154,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.20.25
4,mac:06:96:80:00:00:37,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broa
dcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolatio
nUri:vlan://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{de
viceId:0,networkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:false,uuid:b31abe5f-5f6d-414
3-9581-05f7ab68906a,ip:10.1.1.1,netmask:255.255.255.0,mac:02:00:
3d:47:00:02,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan
,type:Guest,broadcastUri:vlan://397,isolationUri:vlan://397,is
SecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:guest},{deviceId:1,networkRateMbps:
-1,defaultNic:false,uuid:dbc356b5-79ca-4f83-9df9-038f89290c89,ip:19
2.168.10.110,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.10.254,mac:02
:00:40:6f:00:06,broadcastType:Native,type:Control,isSecurityGroupE
nabled:false},{deviceId:3,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,ip:0
.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:02:00:
48:ab:00:1a,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan
,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolationUri:vlan://un
tagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{deviceId:4,netwo
rkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,ip:0.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255
,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:02:00:18:2f:00:1b,dns1:61.177.7.1,d
ns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:v
lan://untagged,isolationUri:vlan://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:fa
lse,name:public},{deviceId:5,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,
ip:0.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:
02:00:78:3c:00:1c,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType
:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolationUri:vla
n://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{deviceId:6,
networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,ip:0.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.25
Re: Review Request 29201: CLOUDSTACK-8089: Fixed test_explicit_dedication.py test case and moved to maint folder for it is to be run separately
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29201/ --- (Updated Dec. 19, 2014, 12:56 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Pierre-Luc Dion and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8089 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8089 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This is extension of patch submitted by Saksham: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13560/diff/# Imroved the code further and also moved the test case to maint folder because it needs to be run separately. Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_explicit_dedication.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_explicit_dedication.py 71c4141 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29201/diff/ Testing --- Yes. Log: Test explicit dedication is placing vms of an account on dedicated hosts. ... === TestName: test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 258.255s OK Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 21624: Mouseover to click for quickview
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21624/ --- (Updated Dec. 19, 2014, 1:05 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Pierre-Luc Dion. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- To avoid undesired opening of the quickview or mistake. Ex: destroy an instance and it was the top instance quickview which was open. For the quickview '+' button, I change the mouseover to the click handler. Diffs - ui/scripts/ui/widgets/listView.js d5ba2fe Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21624/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Axel Delahaye
Re: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI
We should give it some more thought as UI side sorting is limited in its capability in case the data is huge and there is pagination. There could be some default ordering that API’s implement. On top of it we could further have UI/javascript level sorting and searching. On 18-Dec-2014, at 10:47 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: +1 on GUI-side sorting (ideally it would be nice if we could sort by clicking a column header in a table...maybe some reasonable column header would be selected by default for each table) On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Gabor Apati-Nagy gabor.apati-n...@citrix.com wrote: My point here is: unless the API supported sorting as a parameter, we should not rely on any expected sorting done by the API. It is really the presentation layer's job to show the results in an order it wants to. So instead of changing the API, I would suggest let's just sort it at UI side. I see why sorting by name would be good in some cases, but if the same names exist in different domains it could easily become confusing. Or it can be even more confusing if someone tries to find something by hierarchy - not knowing it's exact name, but knowing where it should be. As a future feature, there could be a browse domains or similar selector where a popup could show them in a searchable grid or similar where users could search by name for instance. So I am +1 for sorting at UI side and -1 for changing to Name (Path) format. And +1 for having the same format everywhere. Thanks, Gabor -Original Message- From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com javascript:;] Sent: 18 December 2014 12:16 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:; Subject: Re: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI Hi, The reason I’ve put the name upfront is because it allows for easy navigation using a keyboard. But I see your point. About the format, it is not consistent now, as most lists display the path whereas others display just the name (which is really not what you want). For example when dedicating a zone to an account. I'd suggest changing then all to the same format. As an alternative, would sorting it at the API level be better? Then we wouldn’t have to do it client side and we’d only have to change it at one place only. Regards, Remi On Dec 18, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: +1 for sorting - somwhat painfull to find domains in current situation... On 18 December 2014 at 11:35, Gabor Apati-Nagy gabor.apati-n...@citrix.com javascript:; wrote: Hi, I think sorting would be good to have, but I would not change the display format because that would remove hierarchy (as a sorting criteria). Wouldn't it be good to sort just by path? (To me sorting looks like an improvement, changing the format is more like a change that may cause problem for some.) Cheers, Gabor -Original Message- From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com javascript:;] Sent: 18 December 2014 08:40 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:; Subject: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI Hi all, In our employee cloud most of our employees have their own Domain to spin up machines. Since we have 150+ domains and the lists are unsorted, it is very hard to find the one you need. The order returned by the API is the order they were added. Without any knowledge of the CloudStack UI, I decided to spend some spare time on this, to figure out a way of fixing this issue. I succeeded, as in my dev environment it now shows alphabetically ordered lists. Although, I discovered that the javascript code that does the select for the domains is on many places in the code base (25+ occurrences, with 3 or so variations). Am I supposed to fix this ordering on all these occurrences or am I missing something? First, I fixed it on the most obvious parts that bother us most: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/af3a7755a26e13d36a36 00f16acac61085a1fa50 This I have verified works well. Then did a search and altered the others as well: https://github.com/remibergsma/cloudstack/commit/f0a2e09df4b9887d7712 50dc8682739b8728952b This I still need to test/verify. Before I proceed, could you let me know if this is the way to fix it (without refactoring the whole thing into a single shared function). Thanks, Remi -- Andrija Panić -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software
Upgrade your git clients
Folks - just heard of a vulnerability in apparently all git clients where if you’re using a case-insensitive filesystem (e.g. Windows or OSX), somebody could overwrite your .git/config directory, resulting in running commands on your local box. Short story, upgrade your git clients. More info here: https://github.com/blog/1938-git-client-vulnerability-announced John
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #817
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5-simulator #136
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/136/changes Changes: [jessicawang] CLOUDSTACK-6744 UI zone wizard baremetal hypervisor support EIP ELB feature. -- [...truncated 1072 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-framework-cluster --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-framework-cluster --- [INFO] Compiling 28 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/framework/cluster/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-framework-cluster --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/framework/cluster/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-framework-cluster --- [INFO] No sources to compile [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-framework-cluster --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/framework/cluster/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Results : Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-framework-events --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/framework/events/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/framework/events (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-framework-events --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-framework-events --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-framework-events --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/framework/events/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-framework-events --- [INFO] Compiling 5 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/framework/events/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-framework-events --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/framework/events/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-framework-events --- [INFO] No sources to compile [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-framework-events --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/framework/events/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Results : Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/engine/schema/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/ws/engine/schema (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-engine-schema
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #109
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
RE: hyper-v VR does not have management network
When I checked in the pasted log,
In the nic json details all the nics have names .
Name value is present in each nic details. All the nics have either public or
guest names.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: 穆凯辉 [mailto:k...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 6:11 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 答复: hyper-v VR does not have management network
We also check the cloud agent status in VR vm, the process of which also exists
in VR.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
发送时间: 2014年12月18日 22:17
收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: RE: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Are you using traffic lables?
Hyperv will work only in dedicated zone only , you cannot replace esx host with
hyperv host and make the zone to work.
There are no issues with VR to run on Hyperv. It works well.
If you are using traffic lables, make sure the traffic lable matches to vswitch
name on the hyperv host. If there is not matching vswitch name it can fail
creating the VM.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: 穆凯辉 [mailto:k...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 3:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Hi,
We use hyper-v as the hypervisor for cloudstack 4.4.1. The ssvm and cpvm start
successfully.
But the VR vm can not connect to the cloudstack management. We found that the
VR vm used guest virtual switch for the first and second network, and public
virtual switch for the third network, and several network without virtual
switch. So we checked the log in cloudstack management, and found the
parameters to create the CR vm, shown as follows:
2014-12-18 16:48:21,045 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-152:ctx-17dca502) POST response is
[{com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer:{result:true,details:null,vm:{id
:27,name:r-27-VM,type:DomainRouter,cpus:1,minSpeed:500,maxSpeed
:500,minRam:134217728,maxRam:134217728,arch:x86_64,os:Debian
GNU/Linux 5.0 (64-bit),bootArgs: template=domP name=r-27-VM
eth2ip=192.168.20.154 eth2mask=255.255.255.0 gateway=192.168.20.254
eth0ip=10.1.1.1 eth0mask=255.255.255.0 domain=cs2cloud.internal cidrsize=24
dhcprange=10.1.1.1 eth1ip=192.168.10.110 eth1mask=255.255.255.0
mgmtcidr=192.168.20.0/24 localgw=192.168.10.254 type=router
disable_rp_filter=true extra_pubnics=2 dns1=61.177.7.1 dns2=192.168.10.3
nic_macs=02:00:3d:47:00:02|02:00:40:6f:00:06|06:96:80:00:00:37|02:00:48:ab:0
0:1a|02:00:18:2f:00:1b|02:00:78:3c:00:1c|02:00:1b:aa:00:1d|02:00:79:37:00:1e
,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:true,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamical
lyScaleVm:false,vncPassword:aa9ef9b5fb278d27,params:{},uuid:af08f8
42-49a9-4c24-8eb9-9e8fb89aea7c,disks:[{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.sto
rage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volu
meType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataSto
reTO:{uuid:88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977,id:4,poolType:SMB
,host:192.168.10.6,path:/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud,port
:445,url:SMB://192.168.10.6/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud/?ROLE=Pr
imarySTOREUUID=88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977}},name:ROOT-27,si
ze:1124355072,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volumeId:28,
vmName:r-27-VM,accountId:2,format:VHD,id:28,deviceId:0,hypervi
sorType:Hyperv}},diskSeq:0,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1
,type:ROOT,_details:{managed:false,storagePort:445,storageHo
st:192.168.10.6,volumeSize:1124355072}}],nics:[{deviceId:2,netwo
rkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:true,uuid:be7dc9f2-eff8-4a7e-8229-ffb3be8f04
af,ip:192.168.20.154,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.20.25
4,mac:06:96:80:00:00:37,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broa
dcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolatio
nUri:vlan://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{de
viceId:0,networkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:false,uuid:b31abe5f-5f6d-414
3-9581-05f7ab68906a,ip:10.1.1.1,netmask:255.255.255.0,mac:02:00:
3d:47:00:02,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan
,type:Guest,broadcastUri:vlan://397,isolationUri:vlan://397,is
SecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:guest},{deviceId:1,networkRateMbps:
-1,defaultNic:false,uuid:dbc356b5-79ca-4f83-9df9-038f89290c89,ip:19
2.168.10.110,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.10.254,mac:02
:00:40:6f:00:06,broadcastType:Native,type:Control,isSecurityGroupE
nabled:false},{deviceId:3,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,ip:0
.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:02:00:
48:ab:00:1a,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan
,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolationUri:vlan://un
tagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{deviceId:4,netwo
rkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,ip:0.0.0.0,netmask:255.255.255.255
,gateway:192.168.20.254,mac:02:00:18:2f:00:1b,dns1:61.177.7.1,d
ns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:v
Can't download ISO's can't setup Templates
Hi All, Finally i have successfully added a host in to the management server. Now to create and instance i am unable to download an ISO image. When i click on the sample iso images which is CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM). It shows that it is not ready and i also don't see the download status what could be the issue. I did correctly setup my primary and secondary storages. But i dont have a system vm! is it must to run a system vm? And why can't i download and iSO image and set up an instance. Thank you.
答复: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Hyper-v nics without name parameter:
{deviceId:1,networkRateMbps:
-1,defaultNic:false,uuid:dbc356b5-79ca-4f83-9df9-038f89290c89,ip:19
2.168.10.110,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.10.254,mac:02
:00:40:6f:00:06,broadcastType:Native,type:Control,isSecurityGroupE
nabled:false}
VMware exsi nics with name parameter vSwitch0.
{deviceId:1,networkRateMbps:-1,d
efaultNic:false,uuid:f1ea1c22-e4fa-4a25-9e75-221920982c76,ip:192.168
.10.150,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.10.254,mac:02:00:5
d:40:00:07,broadcastType:Native,type:Control,isSecurityGroupEnable
d:false,name:vSwitch0}
We have management virtual switch in Hyper-v host for the management and
storage network traffic.
Thank you very much
-邮件原件-
发件人: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
发送时间: 2014年12月19日 11:37
收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: RE: hyper-v VR does not have management network
When I checked in the pasted log,
In the nic json details all the nics have names .
Name value is present in each nic details. All the nics have either public
or guest names.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: 穆凯辉 [mailto:k...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 6:11 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 答复: hyper-v VR does not have management network
We also check the cloud agent status in VR vm, the process of which also
exists in VR.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
发送时间: 2014年12月18日 22:17
收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: RE: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Are you using traffic lables?
Hyperv will work only in dedicated zone only , you cannot replace esx host
with hyperv host and make the zone to work.
There are no issues with VR to run on Hyperv. It works well.
If you are using traffic lables, make sure the traffic lable matches to
vswitch name on the hyperv host. If there is not matching vswitch name it
can fail creating the VM.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: 穆凯辉 [mailto:k...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 3:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Hi,
We use hyper-v as the hypervisor for cloudstack 4.4.1. The ssvm and cpvm
start successfully.
But the VR vm can not connect to the cloudstack management. We found that
the VR vm used guest virtual switch for the first and second network, and
public virtual switch for the third network, and several network without
virtual switch. So we checked the log in cloudstack management, and found
the parameters to create the CR vm, shown as follows:
2014-12-18 16:48:21,045 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-152:ctx-17dca502) POST response is
[{com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer:{result:true,details:null,vm:{id
:27,name:r-27-VM,type:DomainRouter,cpus:1,minSpeed:500,maxSpeed
:500,minRam:134217728,maxRam:134217728,arch:x86_64,os:Debian
GNU/Linux 5.0 (64-bit),bootArgs: template=domP name=r-27-VM
eth2ip=192.168.20.154 eth2mask=255.255.255.0 gateway=192.168.20.254
eth0ip=10.1.1.1 eth0mask=255.255.255.0 domain=cs2cloud.internal cidrsize=24
dhcprange=10.1.1.1 eth1ip=192.168.10.110 eth1mask=255.255.255.0
mgmtcidr=192.168.20.0/24 localgw=192.168.10.254 type=router
disable_rp_filter=true extra_pubnics=2 dns1=61.177.7.1 dns2=192.168.10.3
nic_macs=02:00:3d:47:00:02|02:00:40:6f:00:06|06:96:80:00:00:37|02:00:48:ab:0
0:1a|02:00:18:2f:00:1b|02:00:78:3c:00:1c|02:00:1b:aa:00:1d|02:00:79:37:00:1e
,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:true,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamical
lyScaleVm:false,vncPassword:aa9ef9b5fb278d27,params:{},uuid:af08f8
42-49a9-4c24-8eb9-9e8fb89aea7c,disks:[{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.sto
rage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volu
meType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataSto
reTO:{uuid:88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977,id:4,poolType:SMB
,host:192.168.10.6,path:/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud,port
:445,url:SMB://192.168.10.6/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud/?ROLE=Pr
imarySTOREUUID=88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977}},name:ROOT-27,si
ze:1124355072,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volumeId:28,
vmName:r-27-VM,accountId:2,format:VHD,id:28,deviceId:0,hypervi
sorType:Hyperv}},diskSeq:0,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1
,type:ROOT,_details:{managed:false,storagePort:445,storageHo
st:192.168.10.6,volumeSize:1124355072}}],nics:[{deviceId:2,netwo
rkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:true,uuid:be7dc9f2-eff8-4a7e-8229-ffb3be8f04
af,ip:192.168.20.154,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.20.25
4,mac:06:96:80:00:00:37,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broa
dcastType:Vlan,type:Public,broadcastUri:vlan://untagged,isolatio
nUri:vlan://untagged,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:public},{de
viceId:0,networkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:false,uuid:b31abe5f-5f6d-414
3-9581-05f7ab68906a,ip:10.1.1.1,netmask:255.255.255.0,mac:02:00:
3d:47:00:02,dns1:61.177.7.1,dns2:192.168.10.3,broadcastType:Vlan
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #818
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
RE: hyper-v VR does not have management network
It works completely different for VMWare and HyperV.
Currently on which virtual switch the control nic of hyperv is present?
Is there any failure while creating VR on hyper-V?
Share the agent and mgmt. logs at the time of failure.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: 穆凯辉 [mailto:k...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 9:21 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 答复: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Hyper-v nics without name parameter:
{deviceId:1,networkRateMbps:
-1,defaultNic:false,uuid:dbc356b5-79ca-4f83-9df9-038f89290c89,ip:19
2.168.10.110,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.10.254,mac:02
:00:40:6f:00:06,broadcastType:Native,type:Control,isSecurityGroupE
nabled:false}
VMware exsi nics with name parameter vSwitch0.
{deviceId:1,networkRateMbps:-1,d
efaultNic:false,uuid:f1ea1c22-e4fa-4a25-9e75-221920982c76,ip:192.168
.10.150,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:192.168.10.254,mac:02:00:5
d:40:00:07,broadcastType:Native,type:Control,isSecurityGroupEnable
d:false,name:vSwitch0}
We have management virtual switch in Hyper-v host for the management and
storage network traffic.
Thank you very much
-邮件原件-
发件人: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
发送时间: 2014年12月19日 11:37
收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: RE: hyper-v VR does not have management network
When I checked in the pasted log,
In the nic json details all the nics have names .
Name value is present in each nic details. All the nics have either public
or guest names.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: 穆凯辉 [mailto:k...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 6:11 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 答复: hyper-v VR does not have management network
We also check the cloud agent status in VR vm, the process of which also exists
in VR.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
发送时间: 2014年12月18日 22:17
收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: RE: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Are you using traffic lables?
Hyperv will work only in dedicated zone only , you cannot replace esx host with
hyperv host and make the zone to work.
There are no issues with VR to run on Hyperv. It works well.
If you are using traffic lables, make sure the traffic lable matches to vswitch
name on the hyperv host. If there is not matching vswitch name it can fail
creating the VM.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: 穆凯辉 [mailto:k...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 3:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: hyper-v VR does not have management network
Hi,
We use hyper-v as the hypervisor for cloudstack 4.4.1. The ssvm and cpvm start
successfully.
But the VR vm can not connect to the cloudstack management. We found that the
VR vm used guest virtual switch for the first and second network, and public
virtual switch for the third network, and several network without virtual
switch. So we checked the log in cloudstack management, and found the
parameters to create the CR vm, shown as follows:
2014-12-18 16:48:21,045 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-152:ctx-17dca502) POST response is
[{com.cloud.agent.api.StartAnswer:{result:true,details:null,vm:{id
:27,name:r-27-VM,type:DomainRouter,cpus:1,minSpeed:500,maxSpeed
:500,minRam:134217728,maxRam:134217728,arch:x86_64,os:Debian
GNU/Linux 5.0 (64-bit),bootArgs: template=domP name=r-27-VM
eth2ip=192.168.20.154 eth2mask=255.255.255.0 gateway=192.168.20.254
eth0ip=10.1.1.1 eth0mask=255.255.255.0 domain=cs2cloud.internal cidrsize=24
dhcprange=10.1.1.1 eth1ip=192.168.10.110 eth1mask=255.255.255.0
mgmtcidr=192.168.20.0/24 localgw=192.168.10.254 type=router
disable_rp_filter=true extra_pubnics=2 dns1=61.177.7.1 dns2=192.168.10.3
nic_macs=02:00:3d:47:00:02|02:00:40:6f:00:06|06:96:80:00:00:37|02:00:48:ab:0
0:1a|02:00:18:2f:00:1b|02:00:78:3c:00:1c|02:00:1b:aa:00:1d|02:00:79:37:00:1e
,rebootOnCrash:false,enableHA:true,limitCpuUse:false,enableDynamical
lyScaleVm:false,vncPassword:aa9ef9b5fb278d27,params:{},uuid:af08f8
42-49a9-4c24-8eb9-9e8fb89aea7c,disks:[{data:{org.apache.cloudstack.sto
rage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volu
meType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataSto
reTO:{uuid:88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977,id:4,poolType:SMB
,host:192.168.10.6,path:/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud,port
:445,url:SMB://192.168.10.6/primary?user=cloudadmindomain=cloud/?ROLE=Pr
imarySTOREUUID=88e26dcb-f058-36a7-a616-1f876b837977}},name:ROOT-27,si
ze:1124355072,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1,volumeId:28,
vmName:r-27-VM,accountId:2,format:VHD,id:28,deviceId:0,hypervi
sorType:Hyperv}},diskSeq:0,path:22b14554-2172-4502-a125-4b2a4e0228c1
,type:ROOT,_details:{managed:false,storagePort:445,storageHo
st:192.168.10.6,volumeSize:1124355072}}],nics:[{deviceId:2,netwo
rkRateMbps:200,defaultNic:true,uuid:be7dc9f2-eff8-4a7e-8229-ffb3be8f04
Re: Review Request 29194: CLOUDSTACK-8087: Fixed test_vpc_on_host_maintenance.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29194/#review65601 --- Ship it! 162f61b73fa0e8faa981bc090df27fea8afc4c50 master 6c722c9d219ae3bedad12a28105800b096eeb147 4.5 - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Dec. 18, 2014, 6:39 a.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29194/ --- (Updated Dec. 18, 2014, 6:39 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8087 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8087 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Passed start=False while creating VPC because it is being created when hosts are in maintenance state. Fixed pep8 issues too. Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_vpc_on_host_maintenance.py eb3360a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29194/diff/ Testing --- Yes. It still fails while asserting the state of VPC. On hold until heard from developer. Logged product bug for this. Thanks, Ashutosh Kelkar
Jenkins build is back to normal : build-4.5-simulator #137
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5-simulator/137/changes
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #819
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Re: Review Request 29187: CLOUDSTACK-8086: Simulator needs a Portable IP Range to execute Portable IP Test Cases
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29187/#review65605 --- Ship it! 696698090eb2ea548bfc74b802ba7dd01a584b91 master f2c7ead8ee68de963a97eae9dc78bf524565691e 4.5 - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Dec. 18, 2014, 2:29 a.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29187/ --- (Updated Dec. 18, 2014, 2:29 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8086 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8086 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Currently test cases are failing in Simulator, since the portable IP Range dictionary is empty in testdata.py. Fake IP Range information needs to be provided so that the test cases can be run without any issues. Diffs - tools/marvin/marvin/config/test_data.py 269f46e Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29187/diff/ Testing --- Testing not done Thanks, Chandan Purushothama
Re: Review Request 29151: CLOUDSTACK-8084: Fixed test_17_add_nic_different_zone in test_add_remove_network.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29151/#review65604 --- Ship it! 3090e4a0301c4be50d0d46703b2d9fa070c2e91b master 0db63d87aa40de7493a6bc66b7686cf8922bc742 4.5 - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Dec. 17, 2014, 12:17 p.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29151/ --- (Updated Dec. 17, 2014, 12:17 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8084 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8084 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The network was created within root admin account, so it had a risk of getting used by other test cases by default. In that case cleanup would fail. Created the network in account created by the test case. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_add_remove_network.py aacd44b Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29151/diff/ Testing --- Yes. Log: Add network to vm where both belong to different zones ... === TestName: test_17_add_nic_different_zone | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 308.910s OK Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 29202: CLOUDSTACK-8090: Moving test_dedicated_guest_vlan_ranges.py to maint folder for the test cases need to be run separately, serially
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29202/#review65606 --- Ship it! 95b558414f0808d63920a2906f484fd6b15a4713 master d88126988b04bb8a58fb70e195722b01b45f05dc 4.5 - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Dec. 18, 2014, 10:33 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29202/ --- (Updated Dec. 18, 2014, 10:33 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8090 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8090 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The test cases need to be run separately as they create vlan ranges, and dedicated them to an account/project. In between the vlans should not get consumed by other account. Else test cases will fail like following Execute cmd: dedicateguestvlanrange failed, due to: errorCode: 431, errorText:Guest vlan from this range 3390 is allocated to a different account. Can only dedicate a range which has no allocated vlans or has vlans allocated to the same account Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_dedicate_guest_vlan_ranges.py PRE-CREATION test/integration/component/test_dedicate_guest_vlan_ranges.py 9a0e7f0 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29202/diff/ Testing --- N/A Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #820
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Review Request 29241: CLOUDSTACK-8095: Fixed Iso attach issue in test_escalations_instances.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29241/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8095 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8095 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The test case was failing while attaching Iso to VM because it did not check whether the Iso is compatible to the VM. Added the check for xenserver and vmware compatible Iso so that xs-tools iso would get attached in case of XenServer and similar to vmware. Also fixed pep8 issues. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_escalations_instances.py e79cd3d Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29241/diff/ Testing --- @Desc: Test Attach ISO to VM and Detach ISO from VM. ... === TestName: test_13_attach_detach_iso | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 167.657s OK Thanks, Ashutosh Kelkar
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #110
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
