Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #123
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
[MERGE] Support Granular SCSI disk controllers in CloudStack over VMware hypervisor
Hi, I would like merge the branch 'vmware-disk-controllers' into master branch. This branch contains implementation to support Granular SCSI disk controllers in CloudStack over VMware hypervisor. This is specific to VMware hypervisor only. The code changes are in area of vmware resource. All changes are being tracked using JIRA ticket [3] with code in ACS branch 'vmware-disk-controllers'. Please see [2[ for Functional specification which was discussed in proposal thread [1] below and talk [4] held at CCC EU 2014, Budapest. Currently CloudStack supports following combinations only. * DATA volumes - SCSI controller (LSI Logic Parallel) - Hard coded in source code, no option for user to edit/choose the controller type * ROOT volumes - IDE or SCSI (LSI Logic Parallel) - Baed on value of global configuration parameter vmware.root.disk.controller For some guest operating systems like Windows 2012 R2, deploying instances with LSI Parallel controller might result in failure to boot as guest OS vendor is not shipping the OS with LSI Logic parallel drivers. OS Vendor is supporting/shipping LSI SAS controller as preferred. CloudStack should provide administrator the means to choose the type of disk controller (including sub types listed in introduction section above) for an instance. The controller to be used by VM to access virtual disk (volume) can decided for various reasons. Some of them are listed here, * Some controllers are optimized for best performance over specific backend infrastructure like SAN. Ex: VMware Paravirtual SCSI *Compatibility of some controllers with VM's virtual hardware version or guest operating system. *Operating system vendor recommendation and default set of drivers distributed as part of operating system image. Ex: Windows 8.1 ISO doesn't have Lsi Logic Parallel SCSI drivers by default. Hence a virtual disk attached to this controller won't accessible during installation of OS using the ISO. Now CloudStack provides administrator options to specify disk controllers to use for user instances at various ways. 1) Global configuration settings 2) Template settings (during registration of template) 3) Option to enable auto detection of the recommended disk controller for the instance's guest operating system by vendor and applicable virtual hardware version. Please let me know your comments. Regards, Sateesh [1] http://markmail.org/thread/en4skoqu4mbitacs [2] Functional specification document - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/vI5cAg [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4787 [4] http://ccceu2014.sched.org/event/5d24aad67443542c72b5fc51c25c090b From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 12:06 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Server 2012 R2 Bug on CS 4.4.0 with vmware hypervisor -Original Message- From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com] Sent: 15 November 2014 14:06 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Michael Phillips Subject: RE: Server 2012 R2 Bug on CS 4.4.0 with vmware hypervisor Hi Michael, further clarification; CS adds the data disk to the VM but since it's listed as SCSI device 0:0, the vm is unable to find it when you do a disk rescan. Yes, due to absence of LSI Logic Parallel driver in the guest, the virtual disk goes undetected. Currently for all data volumes, of user instance deployed by CloudStack, are attached to LSI Logic Parallel controller. And this is not configurable, which is be a blocker for most recent versions of Windows OS like Windows 2012 R2 and Windows 8.1 which does not ship/pack LSI Logic Parallel driver by default, which means all virtual disks attached to this controller would not detected. Support for choice of controllers is in progress and expected to be available in CloudStack 4.6 release. I am going to talk about proposal to address this and implementation details in CloudStack Collaboration Conference scheduled next week at Budapest, Hungary. Link to the entry in conference schedule is [1] and JIRA ticket for this feature is [2] [1] http://ccceu2014.sched.org/event/5d24aad67443542c72b5fc51c25c090b?iframe=yesw=sidebar=yesbg=no [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4787 Hi, I am working on implementation of this feature based on functional specification [2] and followed by proposal thread [1] below. All changes are being tracked using JIRA ticket [3] using ACS branch 'vmware-disk-controllers' [1] http://markmail.org/thread/en4skoqu4mbitacs [2] Short link for functional specification document - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/vI5cAg [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4787 Regards, Sateesh -Original Message- From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 November 2014 12:01 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Server 2012 R2 Bug on CS 4.4.0 with vmware hypervisor
Re: [QUESTION] Synchronizing across management servers
The use case is that I have access control lists on my SAN that I
dynamically update as a given volume is attached to or detached from a VM
in a cluster.
Let's say multiple attach commands come in for VMs in the same cluster (I
use one ACL per compute cluster). This leads to the storage framework
calling grantAccess on my plug-in from different threads at the same time
(which leads to the plug-in losing one of the volumes that is supposed to
be in the ACL).
If I use only one management server and protect grantAccess with a
synchronized block, the problem goes away (the ACL is always correct).
I was looking to extend this synchronization across grantAccess calls that
are running in multiple management servers at the same time.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Yes, it should do it for you. Please check for the references of this
method and ensure there are other logic pieces using this.
It might help if you can you give some context of of your use case ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 13/01/15 4:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have code in my plug-in that I'd like to make sure doesn't run in
multiple threads at the same time.
Of course if there were only the possibility of one management server ever
running at a time, then I could just use synchronized.
What is the recommended CloudStack approach?
I see code like this in places (in a try block):
GlobalLock lock =
GlobalLock.getInternLock(templateIdPoolIdString);
if (!lock.lock(5)) {
s_logger.debug(Couldn't lock the db on the string +
templateIdPoolIdString);
return null;
}
Then the finally block has this:
lock.unlock();
lock.releaseRef();
Does this achieve what I'm looking for?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play* *
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-6900: Fixed if we download a v...
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/64 CLOUDSTACK-6900: Fixed if we download a volume and then migrate the same volume, then migration fails In findByStoreVolume method of VolumeDataStoreDao now listing only those volumes whose download_url is not generated in volume_store_ref. This will not affect migrate operations as in that case download_url is never generated In case of download volume operation that is only set when volume reached to ready state in volume_store_ref table. After that this row is not listed through findByStoreVolume method so it will not affect in that case also. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/anshul1886/cloudstack-1 CLOUDSTACK-6900 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/64.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #64 commit b35b30ecb7653759d6272f4ac9b0dca37b987746 Author: Anshul Gangwar anshul.gang...@citrix.com Date: 2015-01-13T11:05:10Z CLOUDSTACK-6900: In findByStoreVolume method of VolumeDataStoreDao now listing only those volumes whose download_url is not generated in volume_store_ref. This will not affect migrate operations as in that case download_url is never generated In case of download volume operation that is only set when volume reached to ready state in volume_store_ref table. After that this row is not listed through this method so it will not affect in that case also. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
RE: Can not add a new virtual instance by a template
Did you verify the template you are launching the VM from is completely
downloaded and it's integrity.
-Original Message-
From: w...@landhightech.com [mailto:w...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 3:17 AM
To: dev
Subject: Can not add a new virtual instance by a template
Hi，
We had an issue when we add a new virtual instance by template.we can not
create the new instance.
We use cloudstack 4.4.1 + Vmware ,advanced network ,local storage.
We want to add a new virtual instance into a share network.
Message: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing request body
to server
--
2015-01-09 23:30:14,876 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.RemoteHostEndPoint]
(Timer-11:ctx-a09c3aac) Sending command
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand to host: 3
2015-01-09 23:30:14,878 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Timer-11:ctx-a09c3aac) Seq
3-1751055830117010306: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 52230225403, via: 3(s-1-VM),
Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadProgressCommand:{jobId:b7835acd-50af-44e7-a91c-94b715722bfc,request:GET_STATUS,hvm:false,description:CentOS
5.3(64-bit) no GUI
(vSphere),checksum:f6f881b7f2292948d8494db837fe0f47,maxDownloadSizeInBytes:53687091200,id:7,resourceType:TEMPLATE,installPath:template/tmpl/1/7,_store:{com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO:{_url:nfs://192.168.10.2/secondary,_role:Image}},url:http://download.cloud.com/releases/2.2.0/CentOS5.3-x86_64.ova,format:OVA,accountId:1,name:centos53-x64,secUrl:nfs://192.168.10.2/secondary,wait:0}}]
}
2015-01-09 23:30:14,923 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-11:null)
Seq 3-1751055830117010306: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52230225403, via: 3,
Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.storage.DownloadAnswer:{jobId:b7835acd-50af-44e7-a91c-94b715722bfc,downloadPct:0,errorString:
,downloadStatus:DOWNLOAD_IN_PROGRESS,downloadPath:/mnt/SecStorage/19e03beb-309a-3316-8e6d-5f25071372e5/template/tmpl/1/7/dnld5043761750658787860tmp_,installPath:template/tmpl/1/7,templateSize:0,templatePhySicalSize:0,checkSum:f6f881b7f2292948d8494db837fe0f47,result:true,details:
,wait:0}}] }
2015-01-09 23:30:15,780 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-23:ctx-6e8835bf) ===START=== 192.168.255.102 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=dde8c83e-63fc-4b49-b70d-27b3faca7883response=jsonsessionkey=SST2qsGww2SbQBYEsnO7%2BoMlQWU%3D_=1420788674854
2015-01-09 23:30:15,841 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-23:ctx-6e8835bf
ctx-35fa8112) ===END=== 192.168.255.102 -- GET
command=queryAsyncJobResultjobId=dde8c83e-63fc-4b49-b70d-27b3faca7883response=jsonsessionkey=SST2qsGww2SbQBYEsnO7%2BoMlQWU%3D_=1420788674854
2015-01-09 23:30:16,170 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.d.VmWorkJobDaoImpl]
(Vm-Operations-Cleanup-1:ctx-86237200) Expunge completed work job-205
2015-01-09 23:30:18,022 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-3:null)
Seq 3-1751055830117010304: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52230225403, via: 3,
Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer:{result:false,details:Unable
to copy template to primary storage due to exception:Exception:
java.lang.Exception\nMessage: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error
writing request body to server\n,wait:0}}] }
2015-01-09 23:30:18,022 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(Work-Job-Executor-92:ctx-cf7cb5f7 job-206/job-207 ctx-be9a377b) Seq
3-1751055830117010304: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 52230225403, via: 3, Ver: v1,
Flags: 10, { CopyCmdAnswer } }
2015-01-09 23:30:18,047 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-2:null) SeqA 2-22712: Processing Seq 2-22712: { Cmd ,
MgmtId: -1, via: 2, Ver: v1, Flags: 11,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.ConsoleProxyLoadReportCommand:{_proxyVmId:2,_loadInfo:{\n
\connections\: []\n},wait:0}}] }
2015-01-09 23:30:18,116 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-2:null) SeqA 2-22712: Sending Seq 2-22712: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 52230225403, via: 2, Ver: v1, Flags: 100010,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.AgentControlAnswer:{result:true,wait:0}}] }
2015-01-09 23:30:18,150 INFO [o.a.c.s.v.VolumeServiceImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-92:ctx-cf7cb5f7 job-206/job-207 ctx-be9a377b) releasing lock
for VMTemplateStoragePool 19
2015-01-09 23:30:18,151 WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2]
(Work-Job-Executor-92:ctx-cf7cb5f7 job-206/job-207 ctx-be9a377b) Was unable to
find lock for the key template_spool_ref19 and thread id 1216625438
2015-01-09 23:30:18,151 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.VolumeOrchestrator]
(Work-Job-Executor-92:ctx-cf7cb5f7 job-206/job-207 ctx-be9a377b) Unable to
create Vol[32|vm=27|ROOT]:Unable to copy template to primary storage due to
exception:Exception: java.lang.Exception
Message: File upload task failed to complete due to: Error writing request body
to server
2015-01-09 23:30:18,151 INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-92:ctx-cf7cb5f7 job-206/job-207 ctx-be9a377b) Unable to
contact resource.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
+1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm, vpc, and several storage types. On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: (+ users) Hi everyone, David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test this candidate. In case you’re unable to build from source, you may use following repository built from SHA 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740: DEB: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.5/ RPM: http://packages.bhaisaab.org/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.5/ SystemVM Templates: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/4.5.0 On 13-Jan-2015, at 4:46 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Hi folks, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150112T2256;hb=4.5-RC20150112T2256 Commit: 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc1/ PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
Interesting. There's nothing technically wrong with that. I could release my own thing based on current ACS and call it 'CloudMaster 11.0' If I wanted. I wonder if that maps to a 4.4 release with some extra patches, or if they've built off of 4.5 as of RC0 or something. It would be a little demoralizing if it were the latter, given the low amount of participation on the lists regarding ACS 4.5 recently it would seem like an end-run around the community. I doubt it's that though; the community has largely been focusing on making 4.3 and 4.4 more bulletproof, and I'm sure Citrix has a timeline they need to meet and can't let their own releases be slowed by us. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Conrad Geiger cgei...@it1solutions.com wrote: Don't take it back. I just logged in MyCitrix and can download 4.5, it has today's date on it. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro Date: 01/13/2015 6:54 PM (GMT-05:00) To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? Actually, I may have misunderstood. I.e. they say release highlights, not that it was released: https://blogs.citrix.com/2015/01/13/citrix-cloudplatform-4-5-release-highlights/ I take it back! :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie To: CloudStack Dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 23:29:24 Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes on there site? On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' Fedora, not the other way around. Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5 ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC period. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
RE: what's the status of Bare Metal component?
CloudStack offers baremetal for basic zone (see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+KickStart) and advanced zone (see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+Advanced+Networking+Support). Basic zone support has been there for years, advanced zone is new feature in 4.5; development work has been done, though there may be some small enhancements and bug fixes. BTW: competitorstack, funny! -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:22 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: what's the status of Bare Metal component? Hi, What is the status of the Bare Metal deployment component? I'm just being asked to install the competitorstack because of this feature and was wondering where Cloudstack is at the moment? Any docs about it and how can we help with it? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: what's the status of Bare Metal component?
Thanks Frank, that sounds promising. The VMware requirement kind of sucks, though. No way around it, perhaps via some helping sys VM? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 19:29:56 Subject: RE: what's the status of Bare Metal component? CloudStack offers baremetal for basic zone (see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+KickStart) and advanced zone (see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+Advanced+Networking+Support). Basic zone support has been there for years, advanced zone is new feature in 4.5; development work has been done, though there may be some small enhancements and bug fixes. BTW: competitorstack, funny! -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:22 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: what's the status of Bare Metal component? Hi, What is the status of the Bare Metal deployment component? I'm just being asked to install the competitorstack because of this feature and was wondering where Cloudstack is at the moment? Any docs about it and how can we help with it? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: [ACS44][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.3 release candidate 1
sorry, I had send this in a private thread: retracting this candidate due to a user report on 4.4.2 [1] [1] http://markmail.org/message/k7pogohdtipvzccd On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: +1 from me based on basic create/start/stop tests, root resize, ssh passwd/key and userdata tests. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, 9 January, 2015 15:35:46 Subject: [ACS44][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.3 release candidate 1 Hi All, I've created a 4.4.3 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150109T1630 Commit: 436fb55726f45ec5d049e030fdc2a40e54895786 List of changes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8070?filter=12330007 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.3/ PGP release keys (signed using AA4736F3): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan -- Daan
Re: [QUESTION] Synchronizing across management servers
Yes, it should do it for you. Please check for the references of this
method and ensure there are other logic pieces using this.
It might help if you can you give some context of of your use case ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 13/01/15 4:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi,
I have code in my plug-in that I'd like to make sure doesn't run in
multiple threads at the same time.
Of course if there were only the possibility of one management server ever
running at a time, then I could just use synchronized.
What is the recommended CloudStack approach?
I see code like this in places (in a try block):
GlobalLock lock =
GlobalLock.getInternLock(templateIdPoolIdString);
if (!lock.lock(5)) {
s_logger.debug(Couldn't lock the db on the string +
templateIdPoolIdString);
return null;
}
Then the finally block has this:
lock.unlock();
lock.releaseRef();
Does this achieve what I'm looking for?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play**
Re: [QUESTION] Attached/Detached Volume State
+Min. Unfortunately, I don’t think the framework is enhanced for all the different kinds of resources, but it should be the way to go. IMHO Serialization through states was/is just a hacky way of getting around the situation and should be discontinued. Ideally, state of a resource should reflect only its lifecycle not the operations such as snapshotting, migrating etc. Thanks, -Nitin On 13/01/15 4:32 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: It appears that the job queue is used for some commands while for others it is not. Is the intend of the job queue to only serialize operations that are sent to VMs? On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: This is 4.6. It seems like our state-transitioning logic is intended (as one might expect) to protect the object in question from transitions that are invalid given it's current state (this is what I would expect). I do not see, say, the attach and detach operations being serialized. It seems they are running simultaneously. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote: States shouldn¹t be used to serialize operations on a volume. It should be used to denote the lifecycle of the volume instead. I think the async job manager does take care of the serialization. Which version do you see this issue happening ? Thanks, -Nitin On 13/01/15 12:28 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi, Does anyone know why we don't currently have a state and applicable transitions in Volume.State for attaching and detaching volumes? It seems like you'd want to, say, transition to Attaching only when you're in the Ready state (or maybe some other states, as well). I think right now you can confuse the system by sending an attach command and then a detach command before the attach command finishes (it's a race condition...I don't think it always causes trouble). Thoughts? Thanks, Mike -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play* * -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Review Request 29845: CLOUDSTACK-8152: Adding delay before creating snapshot/template from root disk after writing data to disk - test_vm_passwordenabled.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29845/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8152 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8152 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Due to timing issue, sometimes data gets lost if snapshot/template is created from root volume immediately after writing data to disk. Add delay to bypass this issue. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_vm_passwdenabled.py d998ed5 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29845/diff/ Testing --- Test get VM password for password enabled template ... === TestName: test_11_get_vm_password | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 751.495s OK Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: CloudStack Quality Process
Hi, I'm back, what ever time on my case should we doodle it? Thanks, On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote: It's either 16:00 or 17:00 tomorrow (Wed). Anyone else got a preference? -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 10:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can anyone confirm the final time/date? Thanks. On 13-Jan-2015, at 2:50 pm, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote: You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number of attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to come along if they care about these process-type issues. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 05:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process Not dominated, majority presence -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:30 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process 17:00 is the earliest I can do this week, although I realise that's getting late in India and I'm not trying to have a veto. Who's planning to come this week? Last week, it seemed a bit quiet and Citrix- dominated [*], although we still had a good session. Will it pick up again now everyone's back from the Christmas holidays? [*] I know we're representing ourselves not our companies, but it's nice to have a diversity of perspectives. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 12 January 2015 10:21 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can this be moved earlier by an hour to 16GMT ? -abhi On 12-Jan-2015, at 1:36 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: People, I can't make it wednesday 14 17 GMT.. I have a meeting at 17:30 GMT and will be driving there before. Please make a recording for me? regards, -- Daan Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe
Fwd: [ NOTICE ] Service Downtime Notification - R/W git repos
Begin forwarded message: From: Tony Stevenson pct...@apache.org Date: January 13, 2015 at 9:48:51 AM EST To: undisclosed-recipients:; Subject: [ NOTICE ] Service Downtime Notification - R/W git repos Reply-To: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Folks, Please note than on Thursday 15th at 20:00 UTC the Infrastructure team will be taking the read/write git repositories offline. We expect that this migration to last about 4 hours. During the outage the service will be migrated from an old host to a new one. We intend to keep the URL the same for access to the repos after the migration, but an alternate name is already in place in case DNS updates take too long. Please be aware it might take some hours after the completion of the downtime for github to update and reflect any changes. The Infrastructure team have been trialling the new host for about a week now, and [touch wood] have not had any problems with it. The service is current;y available by accessing repos via: https://git-wip-us.apache.org If you have any questions please address them to infrastruct...@apache.org -- Cheers, Tony On behalf of the Apache Infrastructure Team -- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com pct...@apache.org http://www.pc-tony.com GPG - 1024D/51047D66 --
Re: Review Request 29845: CLOUDSTACK-8152: Adding delay before creating snapshot/template from root disk after writing data to disk - test_vm_passwordenabled.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29845/#review67830 --- Ship it! d79837b67a481e618c8291152a9ecec299ff02dd master doesn't apply on 4.5 Applying: CLOUDSTACK-8152: Adding delay before creating snapshot/template from root disk after writing data to disk - test_vm_passwordenabled.py Using index info to reconstruct a base tree... M test/integration/component/test_vm_passwdenabled.py Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge... Auto-merging test/integration/component/test_vm_passwdenabled.py CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/integration/component/test_vm_passwdenabled.py Failed to merge in the changes. Patch failed at 0001 CLOUDSTACK-8152: Adding delay before creating snapshot/template from root disk after writing data to disk - test_vm_passwordenabled.py The copy of the patch that failed is found in: /Users/talluri/asf/cloudstack/.git/rebase-apply/patch When you have resolved this problem, run git am --continue. If you prefer to skip this patch, run git am --skip instead. To restore the original branch and stop patching, run git am --abort. - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Jan. 13, 2015, 8:31 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29845/ --- (Updated Jan. 13, 2015, 8:31 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8152 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8152 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Due to timing issue, sometimes data gets lost if snapshot/template is created from root volume immediately after writing data to disk. Add delay to bypass this issue. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_vm_passwdenabled.py d998ed5 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29845/diff/ Testing --- Test get VM password for password enabled template ... === TestName: test_11_get_vm_password | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 751.495s OK Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5 #272
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/272/changes Changes: [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8145: Adding new test to test blocker bugs and modifying other test case to work around the bug [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8147: Fixed typo in test case test_redundant_router.py [talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8149: Code-refactor - test_VirtualRouter_alerts.py -- [...truncated 1289 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-engine-api --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-engine-api --- [INFO] Compiling 107 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/api/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-framework-security --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/framework/security/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-framework-security --- [INFO] No sources to compile [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-framework-security --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/framework/security/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Results : Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-engine-api --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/api/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-engine-api --- [INFO] Compiling 2 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/api/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-api --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/api/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.cloudstack.engine.subsystem.api.storage.ScopeTest Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.387 sec Running org.apache.cloudstack.engine.subsystem.api.storage.type.VolumeTypeHelperTest Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.046 sec Results : Tests run: 11, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Core 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/schema/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-core --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/core/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/core (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-core --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/schema (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-core --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-core --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 26 resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-core --- [INFO] Compiling 331 source files to
Re: Review Request 29478: CLOUDSTACK-8137: Fixed cleanup issue in sec group tests in test_escalations_instances.py
On Jan. 5, 2015, 1:21 p.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote: eae9f0f0b0904a9dad025d4278b5e9b4fdf02b5e master 2dcfa157d37b9306c48f12aee54cb3b6f409277b 4.5 correcting hash for 4.5 17e19224398ac38bc9171bd157fb376361630f6d - SrikanteswaraRao --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29478/#review66633 --- On Dec. 30, 2014, 9:46 a.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29478/ --- (Updated Dec. 30, 2014, 9:46 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8137 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8137 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The test case failed while deleting the security groups in cleanup operation because those were deleted as part of account cleanup. No need to add security groups in cleanup list explicitly. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_escalations_instances.py 1e5ec53 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29478/diff/ Testing --- @Desc: Test to verify deploy VM with multiple Security Groups ... -- Ran 1 test in 0.477s OK Thanks, Ashutosh Kelkar
Re: Review Request 29620: CLOUDSTACK-8143: Corrected a test in BVT test_routers.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29620/#review67838 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sanjeev n On Jan. 6, 2015, 7:37 a.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29620/ --- (Updated Jan. 6, 2015, 7:37 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8143 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8143 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The test case test_03_restart_network_cleanup is restarting the network with cleanup=True and verifying that the linklocalip of the new router should be different than the linklocalip of the old router. However this may not be true as the linklocalip is assigned randomly and hence can be same for the new router. The test case should instead check that the publicip of the new router should be the same as publicip of the old router. Diffs - test/integration/smoke/test_routers.py 7d5f267 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29620/diff/ Testing --- Test router internal basic zone ... SKIP: Skip Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Skip Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test restart network without cleanup ... SKIP: Skip Test router basic setup ... SKIP: Skip Test router advanced setup ... SKIP: Skip Test stop router ... SKIP: Skip Test start router ... SKIP: Skip Test reboot router ... SKIP: Skip -- Ran 9 tests in 231.829s OK (SKIP=8) Thanks, Ashutosh Kelkar
Re: Review Request 29620: CLOUDSTACK-8143: Corrected a test in BVT test_routers.py
On Jan. 13, 2015, 11:10 a.m., sanjeev n wrote: Ship It! commit 9f55411295c9abc843a49f226691a6b720fb0c07 Author: Ashutosh K ashut...@clogeny.com Date: Tue Jan 6 12:54:49 2015 +0530 CLOUDSTACK-8143: Corrected a test in BVT test_routers.py - sanjeev --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29620/#review67838 --- On Jan. 6, 2015, 7:37 a.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29620/ --- (Updated Jan. 6, 2015, 7:37 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8143 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8143 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The test case test_03_restart_network_cleanup is restarting the network with cleanup=True and verifying that the linklocalip of the new router should be different than the linklocalip of the old router. However this may not be true as the linklocalip is assigned randomly and hence can be same for the new router. The test case should instead check that the publicip of the new router should be the same as publicip of the old router. Diffs - test/integration/smoke/test_routers.py 7d5f267 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29620/diff/ Testing --- Test router internal basic zone ... SKIP: Skip Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Skip Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test restart network without cleanup ... SKIP: Skip Test router basic setup ... SKIP: Skip Test router advanced setup ... SKIP: Skip Test stop router ... SKIP: Skip Test start router ... SKIP: Skip Test reboot router ... SKIP: Skip -- Ran 9 tests in 231.829s OK (SKIP=8) Thanks, Ashutosh Kelkar
Re: Review Request 29620: CLOUDSTACK-8143: Corrected a test in BVT test_routers.py
On Jan. 13, 2015, 11:10 a.m., sanjeev n wrote: Ship It! sanjeev n wrote: commit 9f55411295c9abc843a49f226691a6b720fb0c07 Author: Ashutosh K ashut...@clogeny.com Date: Tue Jan 6 12:54:49 2015 +0530 CLOUDSTACK-8143: Corrected a test in BVT test_routers.py Commit on ACS 4.5: commit 2ed76b2a55f843053e51d243a1545e92307a0012 Author: Ashutosh K ashut...@clogeny.com Date: Tue Jan 6 12:54:49 2015 +0530 CLOUDSTACK-8143: Corrected a test in BVT test_routers.py - sanjeev --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29620/#review67838 --- On Jan. 6, 2015, 7:37 a.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29620/ --- (Updated Jan. 6, 2015, 7:37 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8143 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8143 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The test case test_03_restart_network_cleanup is restarting the network with cleanup=True and verifying that the linklocalip of the new router should be different than the linklocalip of the old router. However this may not be true as the linklocalip is assigned randomly and hence can be same for the new router. The test case should instead check that the publicip of the new router should be the same as publicip of the old router. Diffs - test/integration/smoke/test_routers.py 7d5f267 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29620/diff/ Testing --- Test router internal basic zone ... SKIP: Skip Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Skip Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test restart network without cleanup ... SKIP: Skip Test router basic setup ... SKIP: Skip Test router advanced setup ... SKIP: Skip Test stop router ... SKIP: Skip Test start router ... SKIP: Skip Test reboot router ... SKIP: Skip -- Ran 9 tests in 231.829s OK (SKIP=8) Thanks, Ashutosh Kelkar
Re: [ACS44][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.3 release candidate 2
A user reported a regression, I closed the last vote. explanation in that thread. On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I'm a bit confused, is there any difference compared to RC 1? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 12 January, 2015 21:10:00 Subject: [ACS44][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.3 release candidate 2 Hi All, I've created a 4.4.3 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150112T2202 Commit: 2d9a42e833b576aba016f0d73660da0c5b7b7174 List of changes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8070?filter=12330007 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.3/ PGP release keys (signed using AA4736F3): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan -- Daan
Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-simulator #1567
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/1567/changes Changes: [sanjeev] CLOUDSTACK-8143: Corrected a test in BVT test_routers.py -- [...truncated 1044 lines...] [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/agent/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:3.2:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-agent --- [INFO] Changes detected - recompiling the module! [INFO] Compiling 15 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/agent/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-agent --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/agent/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:3.2:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-agent --- [INFO] Changes detected - recompiling the module! [INFO] Compiling 2 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/agent/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.18.1:test (default-test) @ cloud-agent --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/agent/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Running com.cloud.agent.AgentShellTest log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (com.cloud.agent.AgentShell). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly. log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info. Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.403 sec - in com.cloud.agent.AgentShellTest Running com.cloud.agent.dao.impl.PropertiesStorageTest Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.253 sec - in com.cloud.agent.dao.impl.PropertiesStorageTest Results : Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Framework - Clustering 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-framework-cluster --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/framework/cluster/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/framework/cluster (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-framework-cluster --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-framework-cluster --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-framework-cluster --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:3.2:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-framework-cluster --- [INFO] Changes detected - recompiling the module! [INFO] Compiling 28 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/framework/cluster/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-framework-cluster --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/framework/cluster/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:3.2:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-framework-cluster --- [INFO] No sources to compile [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.18.1:test (default-test) @ cloud-framework-cluster --- [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Framework - Event Notification 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-framework-events --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/ws/framework/events/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting
RE: CloudStack Quality Process
You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number of attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to come along if they care about these process-type issues. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 05:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process Not dominated, majority presence -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:30 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process 17:00 is the earliest I can do this week, although I realise that's getting late in India and I'm not trying to have a veto. Who's planning to come this week? Last week, it seemed a bit quiet and Citrix- dominated [*], although we still had a good session. Will it pick up again now everyone's back from the Christmas holidays? [*] I know we're representing ourselves not our companies, but it's nice to have a diversity of perspectives. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 12 January 2015 10:21 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can this be moved earlier by an hour to 16GMT ? -abhi On 12-Jan-2015, at 1:36 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: People, I can't make it wednesday 14 17 GMT.. I have a meeting at 17:30 GMT and will be driving there before. Please make a recording for me? regards, -- Daan Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: Review Request 29843: CLOUDSTACK-8149: Code-refactor - test_VirtualRouter_alerts.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29843/#review67827 --- test/integration/component/test_VirtualRouter_alerts.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/29843/#comment111915 Why are we just checking for dnsmasq process status? Why don't we stop it for the monitor service to start? test/integration/component/test_VirtualRouter_alerts.py https://reviews.apache.org/r/29843/#comment111916 Read the router.alerts.check.interval value from Global settings and add 10mins instead of hard coding the value in time.sleep() - sanjeev n On Jan. 13, 2015, 7:04 a.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29843/ --- (Updated Jan. 13, 2015, 7:04 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8149 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8149 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The test case needed a major code-refactor. Also it had import issues and pep8 issues. Fixed those too. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_VirtualRouter_alerts.py bff12f9 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29843/diff/ Testing --- Yes. Thanks, Ashutosh Kelkar
Re: CloudStack Quality Process
Can anyone confirm the final time/date? Thanks. On 13-Jan-2015, at 2:50 pm, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote: You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number of attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to come along if they care about these process-type issues. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 05:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process Not dominated, majority presence -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:30 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process 17:00 is the earliest I can do this week, although I realise that's getting late in India and I'm not trying to have a veto. Who's planning to come this week? Last week, it seemed a bit quiet and Citrix- dominated [*], although we still had a good session. Will it pick up again now everyone's back from the Christmas holidays? [*] I know we're representing ourselves not our companies, but it's nice to have a diversity of perspectives. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 12 January 2015 10:21 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can this be moved earlier by an hour to 16GMT ? -abhi On 12-Jan-2015, at 1:36 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: People, I can't make it wednesday 14 17 GMT.. I have a meeting at 17:30 GMT and will be driving there before. Please make a recording for me? regards, -- Daan Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: CloudStack Quality Process
I was trying to put it off with a joke. It was not dominated by anyone, except maybe yours truly. I hope we will keep it up and get this to some results, soon. Sorry I can't make it this time. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote: You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number of attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to come along if they care about these process-type issues. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 05:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process Not dominated, majority presence -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:30 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process 17:00 is the earliest I can do this week, although I realise that's getting late in India and I'm not trying to have a veto. Who's planning to come this week? Last week, it seemed a bit quiet and Citrix- dominated [*], although we still had a good session. Will it pick up again now everyone's back from the Christmas holidays? [*] I know we're representing ourselves not our companies, but it's nice to have a diversity of perspectives. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 12 January 2015 10:21 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can this be moved earlier by an hour to 16GMT ? -abhi On 12-Jan-2015, at 1:36 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: People, I can't make it wednesday 14 17 GMT.. I have a meeting at 17:30 GMT and will be driving there before. Please make a recording for me? regards, -- Daan Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
Re: Review Request 29806: CLOUDSTACK-8147: Fixed typo in test case test_redundant_router.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29806/#review67826 --- Ship it! 032a00390561005dabdaa840c8ae8b36d136ccbd 4.5 9056e4c3fb568a4cbb978ef0c798bc2dd2c43bf1 master - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Jan. 12, 2015, 12:55 p.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29806/ --- (Updated Jan. 12, 2015, 12:55 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8147 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8147 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The test case has typo connction instead of connection. Diffs - test/integration/component/maint/test_redundant_router.py 01d635b Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29806/diff/ Testing --- yes. Thanks, Ashutosh Kelkar
Jenkins build is back to normal : build-4.5 #273
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/273/changes
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #887
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Re: Review Request 29477: CLOUDSTACK-8135: Fixed cleanup issue in test_escalations_instances.py
On Jan. 5, 2015, 1:21 p.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote: 1ee41888353d87f4972e6ccb492817133805a88e master 4e7f0d277b36be91ef041fc5ae59002679abe2e1 4.5 correcting the hash for 4.5 613aa8ea28b7670b13792a638fc493b6fe8ebb21 - SrikanteswaraRao --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29477/#review66634 --- On Dec. 30, 2014, 7:30 a.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29477/ --- (Updated Dec. 30, 2014, 7:30 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8135 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8135 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The test case failed in cleanup operation because the VM gets cleaned up as a part of account cleanup. Hence no need to add the VM in to cleanup list explicitly. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_escalations_instances.py 1e5ec53 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29477/diff/ Testing --- @Desc: Test Attach ISO to VM and Detach ISO from VM. ... === TestName: test_13_attach_detach_iso | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 167.918s OK Thanks, Ashutosh Kelkar
Re: Review Request 29845: CLOUDSTACK-8152: Adding delay before creating snapshot/template from root disk after writing data to disk - test_vm_passwordenabled.py
On Jan. 13, 2015, 3:37 p.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote: d79837b67a481e618c8291152a9ecec299ff02dd master doesn't apply on 4.5 Applying: CLOUDSTACK-8152: Adding delay before creating snapshot/template from root disk after writing data to disk - test_vm_passwordenabled.py Using index info to reconstruct a base tree... M test/integration/component/test_vm_passwdenabled.py Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge... Auto-merging test/integration/component/test_vm_passwdenabled.py CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/integration/component/test_vm_passwdenabled.py Failed to merge in the changes. Patch failed at 0001 CLOUDSTACK-8152: Adding delay before creating snapshot/template from root disk after writing data to disk - test_vm_passwordenabled.py The copy of the patch that failed is found in: /Users/talluri/asf/cloudstack/.git/rebase-apply/patch When you have resolved this problem, run git am --continue. If you prefer to skip this patch, run git am --skip instead. To restore the original branch and stop patching, run git am --abort. Please cherry-pick 41b871b6bdfd48f673e1fdc011069dd3c7ca032b from master to 4.5 and then apply this patch to 4.5. - Gaurav --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29845/#review67830 --- On Jan. 13, 2015, 2:01 p.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29845/ --- (Updated Jan. 13, 2015, 2:01 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8152 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8152 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Due to timing issue, sometimes data gets lost if snapshot/template is created from root volume immediately after writing data to disk. Add delay to bypass this issue. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_vm_passwdenabled.py d998ed5 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29845/diff/ Testing --- Test get VM password for password enabled template ... === TestName: test_11_get_vm_password | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 1 test in 751.495s OK Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 29759: CLOUDSTACK-8145: Adding new test to test blocker bugs and modifying other test case to work around the bug
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29759/#review67829 --- Ship it! f11e5707961f7a8e18238d06848d1bce6f0172ab master 9278ac1130683057cfbd752138b266565bd0f695 4.5 - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Jan. 9, 2015, 11:06 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29759/ --- (Updated Jan. 9, 2015, 11:06 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8145 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8145 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Few test cases failed due to timing issue in data syncof root disk data. Adding a new test case to test this issue, while changing other test cases with work around so that those are not blokced. More details are mentioned in the jira issue. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_blocker_bugs.py 8ba563f test/integration/component/test_reset_ssh_keypair.py a2e743a Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29759/diff/ Testing --- Yes. Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
Re: Review Request 29509: CLOUDSATCK-8138: Fixed VmSnapshot revert issue in test_escalations_instances.py
On Jan. 5, 2015, 6:50 p.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote: 22d6565434e31a8c65953a9eb1b8bfeea1c0f1d0 master SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote: doesn't apply on 4.5 4.5 branch does not need this patch, closing the review request. - Gaurav --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29509/#review66632 --- On Dec. 31, 2014, 3:22 p.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29509/ --- (Updated Dec. 31, 2014, 3:22 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8138 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8138 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The VM should be in running state while reverting the snapshot because the VmSnapshot includes memorySnapshot too. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_escalations_instances.py 1e5ec5331b9e95d9e7cae5cd5071e0789525c67e Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29509/diff/ Testing --- Yes. Thanks, Gaurav Aradhye
RE: xenserver 6.5
With XS 6.5 released, is anyone able to comment on: 1. Does the 4.5 branch need updating to support it? 2. If the changes are so minor, will we see support in 4.3.x or 4.4.x as well? Do we consider this to be a feature or bug? If the code for the resource class stays exactly the same and the only thing blocking the use of XS 6.5 is the checks that CS does when adding a new host, would this not be considered as a bug? Technically the validation is broken as its intent is to determine whether or not the current resource class can handle the hypervisor. If the current resource class can in fact handle XS6.5 but the validation code says it can't, isn’t this is a bug? Cheers, Adrian -Original Message- From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com] Sent: 20 October 2014 20:10 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: xenserver 6.5 Correct on both counts On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: thanks Tim, from this I take that hypervisor versions are hardcoded still, and xenserver 6.5 is supported since 4.5. correct? On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: Daan, Here are the relevant commits: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=2b e02d1f515d8d089b6596127614fe6b8030d723 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=b7 f5e95c8f17cf42d35705872b4210db8c2def72 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=67 4af6e47313fa18c18536a2daed90d13b9a9a59 Mike, Here's an example of the type of DB changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blobdiff;f= setup/db/db/schema-441to450.sql;h=e6aae8e3d624744af9f19b132fa8f53b5a4c ddb5;hp=34d5f8842005f8a2da4df8a9a838d919cc648831;hb=2be02d1f515d8d089b 6596127614fe6b8030d723;hpb=f212aa57c32eb05d6a69730e37ac50bdb1f0a268 On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Yeah, Tim, I'm a little unclear of what you mean by requiring a DB update. Can you clarify that? Thanks! On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Tim, these changes are needed? so 4.4.1 will not work with db changes... Do you have a commit id? On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote: I know that master had a bunch of cleanup work to make things work better (commits were a month ago), but baring any significant issues, being able to support a newer XenServer should be as simple as a database update. So net of this master *today* should work fine with 6.5 (and the various pre-release builds since beta.2). On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Someone correct me if I'm wrong but, if a previous XenServer resource class can handle the newer version of XenServer, then I don't think you need to make any changes to CloudStack files to use that newer version. If you do see some incompatibility with that version of XenServer, then someone would need to create a new resource class to handle the discrepancies. On Monday, October 20, 2014, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Out of interest, on the assumption that there are no issues with using 6.5 when it's released and there are no backwards-compatibility problems, will it then work with 4.4.1 or does CS need to be *explicitly* told that newer, effectively unknown versions are 'acceptable' as a valid hypervisor? Basically, If we deploy CS 4.4.1 and we like the look of XS 6.5 when it comes out, will we need to make any changes to CS to start using it? If so, are these simple edits to the contents of a file or would it require rebuilding? -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com javascript:;] Sent: 20 October 2014 15:28 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:; Subject: RE: xenserver 6.5 I think it should be minimal, because although there are large internal changes (e.g., 3.x kernel, 64-bit dom0, new Xen, new storage datapath, PVHVM mode for RHEL/CentOS 7), the interface is essentially unchanged. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com javascript:;] Sent: 20 October 2014 14:32 To: dev Subject: xenserver 6.5 Does anybody (know of) work on supporting xenserver 6.5 or has an idea of how much effort that is going to be?
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #888
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
RE: CloudStack Quality Process
It's either 16:00 or 17:00 tomorrow (Wed). Anyone else got a preference? -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 10:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can anyone confirm the final time/date? Thanks. On 13-Jan-2015, at 2:50 pm, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote: You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number of attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to come along if they care about these process-type issues. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 05:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process Not dominated, majority presence -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:30 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process 17:00 is the earliest I can do this week, although I realise that's getting late in India and I'm not trying to have a veto. Who's planning to come this week? Last week, it seemed a bit quiet and Citrix- dominated [*], although we still had a good session. Will it pick up again now everyone's back from the Christmas holidays? [*] I know we're representing ourselves not our companies, but it's nice to have a diversity of perspectives. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 12 January 2015 10:21 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can this be moved earlier by an hour to 16GMT ? -abhi On 12-Jan-2015, at 1:36 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: People, I can't make it wednesday 14 17 GMT.. I have a meeting at 17:30 GMT and will be driving there before. Please make a recording for me? regards, -- Daan Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #122
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
CloudStack Set password through API
Hello All, I am a cloud stack enthusiasts, and i am working with cloud stack API. The problem i am facing is in CHANGE PASSWORD API. i have manage to successfully change the password till now , but when special characters are send via API the new password doesn't work . i am using PHP to call API. i have tried rawurlencode , urlencode but it doesn't work -- *Best Regards * *Ahmad Ismail*
Review Request 29847: CLOUDSTACK-8153: Adding global setting value check for few test cases in test_custom_hostname.py
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29847/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8153 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8153 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The test cases need vm.instancename.flag set to be true. Added check for that. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_custom_hostname.py fcd497e Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29847/diff/ Testing --- Yes. Thanks, Ashutosh Kelkar
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response nam...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63#issuecomment-69761365 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response nam...
GitHub user resmo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63 CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response name string: there is an extra 's' Signed-off-by: René Moser m...@renemoser.net You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/resmo/cloudstack fix/deleteisoapi Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #63 commit c7ebd13d02948fd2ca2d6e4245127e01a2f7579e Author: René Moser m...@renemoser.net Date: 2015-01-13T15:23:31Z CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response name string: there is an extra 's' Signed-off-by: René Moser m...@renemoser.net --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [ACS44][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.3 release candidate 2
I can't see/find that, have a quick url to the regression? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 11:26:11 Subject: Re: [ACS44][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.3 release candidate 2 A user reported a regression, I closed the last vote. explanation in that thread. On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I'm a bit confused, is there any difference compared to RC 1? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, 12 January, 2015 21:10:00 Subject: [ACS44][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.4.3 release candidate 2 Hi All, I've created a 4.4.3 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150112T2202 Commit: 2d9a42e833b576aba016f0d73660da0c5b7b7174 List of changes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8070?filter=12330007 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.3/ PGP release keys (signed using AA4736F3): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Daan -- Daan
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response nam...
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63#issuecomment-69761669 Since, this is an API related change I'm hesitant to merge into master without a discussion around this on dev ML. Can you start a thread on dev ML to discuss fixing typos in the command response key-name. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
RE: CloudStack Quality Process
As we're in the middle of discussing a proposal from Daan, my feeling is that we should have it at 16:00 GMT so that he can attend and I'll sit out this week. (Most weeks I can manage 16:00 or 17:00, but once a month I can't do 16:00). -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 12:50 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process It's either 16:00 or 17:00 tomorrow (Wed). Anyone else got a preference? -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 10:25 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can anyone confirm the final time/date? Thanks. On 13-Jan-2015, at 2:50 pm, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote: You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number of attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to come along if they care about these process-type issues. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: 13 January 2015 05:12 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process Not dominated, majority presence -Original Message- From: Stephen Turner [mailto:stephen.tur...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:30 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process 17:00 is the earliest I can do this week, although I realise that's getting late in India and I'm not trying to have a veto. Who's planning to come this week? Last week, it seemed a bit quiet and Citrix- dominated [*], although we still had a good session. Will it pick up again now everyone's back from the Christmas holidays? [*] I know we're representing ourselves not our companies, but it's nice to have a diversity of perspectives. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 12 January 2015 10:21 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process Can this be moved earlier by an hour to 16GMT ? -abhi On 12-Jan-2015, at 1:36 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: People, I can't make it wednesday 14 17 GMT.. I have a meeting at 17:30 GMT and will be driving there before. Please make a recording for me? regards, -- Daan Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software- engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
what's the status of Bare Metal component?
Hi, What is the status of the Bare Metal deployment component? I'm just being asked to install the competitorstack because of this feature and was wondering where Cloudstack is at the moment? Any docs about it and how can we help with it? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
API response change command=deleteIso
Hi dev I found an inconsistency, call it a typo, in the API response and would like to make an API change [1]. I saw there has been a similar change in the past [2]. Thanks for your response. Regards René [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63 [2] https://github.com/resmo/cloudstack/commit/e7134b82f90cfa9482cd08c3cf4633c64d621117 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response nam...
Github user runseb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63#issuecomment-69767205 I am +1 with this, looks like a typo. definitely good for master. maybe other bug fix releases. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
RE: what's the status of Bare Metal component?
Yeah that's kind of annoying. If users don't mind to put the HTTP/NFS server storing kickstart file and ISOs on the public network, it's possible to use other hypervisors' system VM -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 11:39 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: what's the status of Bare Metal component? Thanks Frank, that sounds promising. The VMware requirement kind of sucks, though. No way around it, perhaps via some helping sys VM? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 19:29:56 Subject: RE: what's the status of Bare Metal component? CloudStack offers baremetal for basic zone (see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+KickS tart) and advanced zone (see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+Advance d+Networking+Support). Basic zone support has been there for years, advanced zone is new feature in 4.5; development work has been done, though there may be some small enhancements and bug fixes. BTW: competitorstack, funny! -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:22 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: what's the status of Bare Metal component? Hi, What is the status of the Bare Metal deployment component? I'm just being asked to install the competitorstack because of this feature and was wondering where Cloudstack is at the moment? Any docs about it and how can we help with it? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: [QUESTION] Locking versus State Transitioning
Yep, there's a state for snapshotting.
That code (from the snippet I provided) appears to be fine.
What drew my attention is the lock on the snapshot object versus a state
transition there.
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote:
Is there a volume state that reflects that it's being snapshotted? If not,
how would mgmt. server know if a subsequent request for snapshot for a
volumes arrives when one is already in progress for that same volume?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com javascript:;]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 5:11 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:;
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Locking versus State Transitioning
That is a good question, Nitin. I have not modified that logic. I just copy
and pasted it to e-mail because I was curious about the lock versus state
transition choice on the snapshot.
I don't think we would need to perform a lock on the volume, though,
because the state transition to Snapshotting should prevent code that
honors that state from performing actions against the volume that it
shouldn't when it's in that state.
I just was mainly wondering why we do a lock against the volume. It seems
that following a state transition to something like Creating should do
the trick.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com
javascript:; wrote:
Hey Mike,
State transition shouldn¹t be used for serialization. Our job framework
should do the same. If not, then its a bug.
Also, in this case locking on snapshot doesn't help, shouldn¹t it be on
the volume ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 13/01/15 12:34 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
javascript:;
wrote:
Hi,
I noticed while examining the code to take a volume snapshot that
XenserverSnapshotStrategy does the following:
SnapshotVO snapshotVO = snapshotDao
.acquireInLockTable(snapshot.getId());
if (snapshotVO == null) {
throw new CloudRuntimeException(Failed to get lock on
snapshot: + snapshot.getId());
}
try {
VolumeInfo volumeInfo = snapshot.getBaseVolume();
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.SnapshotRequested);
SnapshotResult result = null;
try {
result = snapshotSvr.takeSnapshot(snapshot);
if (result.isFailed()) {
s_logger.debug(Failed to take snapshot: +
result.getResult());
throw new CloudRuntimeException(result.getResult());
}
} finally {
if (result != null result.isSuccess()) {
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.OperationSucceeded
);
} else {
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.OperationFailed);
}
}
Is there a reason here why the code acquires a lock on the snapshot
instead
of performing a state transition (say, Allocated to Creating)?
We can see in the same code block that we use a state transition to
protect
the volume.
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com javascript:;
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play* *
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com javascript:;
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #889
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
[QUESTION] Attached/Detached Volume State
Hi, Does anyone know why we don't currently have a state and applicable transitions in Volume.State for attaching and detaching volumes? It seems like you'd want to, say, transition to Attaching only when you're in the Ready state (or maybe some other states, as well). I think right now you can confuse the system by sending an attach command and then a detach command before the attach command finishes (it's a race condition...I don't think it always causes trouble). Thoughts? Thanks, Mike -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
[QUESTION] Locking versus State Transitioning
Hi,
I noticed while examining the code to take a volume snapshot that
XenserverSnapshotStrategy does the following:
SnapshotVO snapshotVO = snapshotDao
.acquireInLockTable(snapshot.getId());
if (snapshotVO == null) {
throw new CloudRuntimeException(Failed to get lock on
snapshot: + snapshot.getId());
}
try {
VolumeInfo volumeInfo = snapshot.getBaseVolume();
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.SnapshotRequested);
SnapshotResult result = null;
try {
result = snapshotSvr.takeSnapshot(snapshot);
if (result.isFailed()) {
s_logger.debug(Failed to take snapshot: +
result.getResult());
throw new CloudRuntimeException(result.getResult());
}
} finally {
if (result != null result.isSuccess()) {
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.OperationSucceeded
);
} else {
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.OperationFailed);
}
}
Is there a reason here why the code acquires a lock on the snapshot instead
of performing a state transition (say, Allocated to Creating)?
We can see in the same code block that we use a state transition to protect
the volume.
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [QUESTION] Attached/Detached Volume State
States shouldn¹t be used to serialize operations on a volume. It should be used to denote the lifecycle of the volume instead. I think the async job manager does take care of the serialization. Which version do you see this issue happening ? Thanks, -Nitin On 13/01/15 12:28 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi, Does anyone know why we don't currently have a state and applicable transitions in Volume.State for attaching and detaching volumes? It seems like you'd want to, say, transition to Attaching only when you're in the Ready state (or maybe some other states, as well). I think right now you can confuse the system by sending an attach command and then a detach command before the attach command finishes (it's a race condition...I don't think it always causes trouble). Thoughts? Thanks, Mike -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play**
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response nam...
Github user nitmehta commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63#issuecomment-69821830 Does this break backward compatibility ? How is this string used ? Can you please post the old and new response for this ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: [QUESTION] Locking versus State Transitioning
Hey Mike,
State transition shouldn¹t be used for serialization. Our job framework
should do the same. If not, then its a bug.
Also, in this case locking on snapshot doesn't help, shouldn¹t it be on
the volume ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 13/01/15 12:34 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Hi,
I noticed while examining the code to take a volume snapshot that
XenserverSnapshotStrategy does the following:
SnapshotVO snapshotVO = snapshotDao
.acquireInLockTable(snapshot.getId());
if (snapshotVO == null) {
throw new CloudRuntimeException(Failed to get lock on
snapshot: + snapshot.getId());
}
try {
VolumeInfo volumeInfo = snapshot.getBaseVolume();
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.SnapshotRequested);
SnapshotResult result = null;
try {
result = snapshotSvr.takeSnapshot(snapshot);
if (result.isFailed()) {
s_logger.debug(Failed to take snapshot: +
result.getResult());
throw new CloudRuntimeException(result.getResult());
}
} finally {
if (result != null result.isSuccess()) {
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.OperationSucceeded
);
} else {
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.OperationFailed);
}
}
Is there a reason here why the code acquires a lock on the snapshot
instead
of performing a state transition (say, Allocated to Creating)?
We can see in the same code block that we use a state transition to
protect
the volume.
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play**
Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5 #275
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/275/changes Changes: [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-8037: Require signed AuthnRequest, adds more security [Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-8155: Remove unwanted whitespaces from json response -- [...truncated 1276 lines...] [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-framework-security --- [INFO] Compiling 7 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/framework/security/target/classes [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/api (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-engine-api --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-engine-api --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ cloud-engine-api --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] Copying 1 resource [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ cloud-engine-api --- [INFO] Compiling 107 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/api/target/classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-framework-security --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/framework/security/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-framework-security --- [INFO] No sources to compile [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-framework-security --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/framework/security/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Results : Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-engine-api --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/api/test/resources [INFO] Copying 3 resources [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-engine-api --- [INFO] Compiling 2 source files to http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/api/target/test-classes [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ cloud-engine-api --- [INFO] Surefire report directory: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/api/target/surefire-reports --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.cloudstack.engine.subsystem.api.storage.ScopeTest Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.286 sec Running org.apache.cloudstack.engine.subsystem.api.storage.type.VolumeTypeHelperTest Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.07 sec Results : Tests run: 11, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Core 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Schema Component 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-core --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/core/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/schema/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = []) [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/core (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-core --- [INFO] Deleting http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/ws/engine/schema (includes = [target, dist], excludes = []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-engine-schema --- [INFO] Starting
Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-simulator #1568
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/1568/changes
Jenkins build is back to normal : build-4.5 #276
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/276/
Re: [QUESTION] Locking versus State Transitioning
That is a good question, Nitin. I have not modified that logic. I just copy
and pasted it to e-mail because I was curious about the lock versus state
transition choice on the snapshot.
I don't think we would need to perform a lock on the volume, though,
because the state transition to Snapshotting should prevent code that
honors that state from performing actions against the volume that it
shouldn't when it's in that state.
I just was mainly wondering why we do a lock against the volume. It seems
that following a state transition to something like Creating should do
the trick.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Hey Mike,
State transition shouldn¹t be used for serialization. Our job framework
should do the same. If not, then its a bug.
Also, in this case locking on snapshot doesn't help, shouldn¹t it be on
the volume ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 13/01/15 12:34 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Hi,
I noticed while examining the code to take a volume snapshot that
XenserverSnapshotStrategy does the following:
SnapshotVO snapshotVO = snapshotDao
.acquireInLockTable(snapshot.getId());
if (snapshotVO == null) {
throw new CloudRuntimeException(Failed to get lock on
snapshot: + snapshot.getId());
}
try {
VolumeInfo volumeInfo = snapshot.getBaseVolume();
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.SnapshotRequested);
SnapshotResult result = null;
try {
result = snapshotSvr.takeSnapshot(snapshot);
if (result.isFailed()) {
s_logger.debug(Failed to take snapshot: +
result.getResult());
throw new CloudRuntimeException(result.getResult());
}
} finally {
if (result != null result.isSuccess()) {
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.OperationSucceeded
);
} else {
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.OperationFailed);
}
}
Is there a reason here why the code acquires a lock on the snapshot
instead
of performing a state transition (say, Allocated to Creating)?
We can see in the same code block that we use a state transition to
protect
the volume.
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play* *
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: [QUESTION] Attached/Detached Volume State
This is 4.6. It seems like our state-transitioning logic is intended (as one might expect) to protect the object in question from transitions that are invalid given it's current state (this is what I would expect). I do not see, say, the attach and detach operations being serialized. It seems they are running simultaneously. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote: States shouldn¹t be used to serialize operations on a volume. It should be used to denote the lifecycle of the volume instead. I think the async job manager does take care of the serialization. Which version do you see this issue happening ? Thanks, -Nitin On 13/01/15 12:28 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi, Does anyone know why we don't currently have a state and applicable transitions in Volume.State for attaching and detaching volumes? It seems like you'd want to, say, transition to Attaching only when you're in the Ready state (or maybe some other states, as well). I think right now you can confuse the system by sending an attach command and then a detach command before the attach command finishes (it's a race condition...I don't think it always causes trouble). Thoughts? Thanks, Mike -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play* * -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
RE: [QUESTION] Locking versus State Transitioning
Is there a volume state that reflects that it's being snapshotted? If not, how
would mgmt. server know if a subsequent request for snapshot for a volumes
arrives when one is already in progress for that same volume?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 5:11 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Locking versus State Transitioning
That is a good question, Nitin. I have not modified that logic. I just copy
and pasted it to e-mail because I was curious about the lock versus state
transition choice on the snapshot.
I don't think we would need to perform a lock on the volume, though,
because the state transition to Snapshotting should prevent code that
honors that state from performing actions against the volume that it
shouldn't when it's in that state.
I just was mainly wondering why we do a lock against the volume. It seems
that following a state transition to something like Creating should do
the trick.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Hey Mike,
State transition shouldn¹t be used for serialization. Our job framework
should do the same. If not, then its a bug.
Also, in this case locking on snapshot doesn't help, shouldn¹t it be on
the volume ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 13/01/15 12:34 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Hi,
I noticed while examining the code to take a volume snapshot that
XenserverSnapshotStrategy does the following:
SnapshotVO snapshotVO = snapshotDao
.acquireInLockTable(snapshot.getId());
if (snapshotVO == null) {
throw new CloudRuntimeException(Failed to get lock on
snapshot: + snapshot.getId());
}
try {
VolumeInfo volumeInfo = snapshot.getBaseVolume();
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.SnapshotRequested);
SnapshotResult result = null;
try {
result = snapshotSvr.takeSnapshot(snapshot);
if (result.isFailed()) {
s_logger.debug(Failed to take snapshot: +
result.getResult());
throw new CloudRuntimeException(result.getResult());
}
} finally {
if (result != null result.isSuccess()) {
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.OperationSucceeded
);
} else {
volumeInfo.stateTransit(Volume.Event.OperationFailed);
}
}
Is there a reason here why the code acquires a lock on the snapshot
instead
of performing a state transition (say, Allocated to Creating)?
We can see in the same code block that we use a state transition to
protect
the volume.
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play* *
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
Hi, I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' Fedora, not the other way around. Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5 ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC period. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #890
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes on there site? On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' Fedora, not the other way around. Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5 ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC period. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
I don't think they put out a release for every CloudStack release. That they put out 4.5 before Apache did is surprising, though. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes on there site? On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' Fedora, not the other way around. Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5 ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC period. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
Actually, I may have misunderstood. I.e. they say release highlights, not that it was released: https://blogs.citrix.com/2015/01/13/citrix-cloudplatform-4-5-release-highlights/ I take it back! :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie To: CloudStack Dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 23:29:24 Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes on there site? On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' Fedora, not the other way around. Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5 ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC period. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
yes, I find the release news from citrix official blog . http://blogs.citrix.com/2015/01/13/citrix-cloudplatform-4-5-release-highlights/ -- Regards, ChunFeng -- Original -- From: Mike Tutkowskimike.tutkow...@solidfire.com; Date: Wed, Jan 14, 2015 07:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgdev@cloudstack.apache.org; Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? I don't think they put out a release for every CloudStack release. That they put out 4.5 before Apache did is surprising, though. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes on there site? On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' Fedora, not the other way around. Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5 ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC period. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
RE: CloudPlatform 4.5 released?
Don't take it back. I just logged in MyCitrix and can download 4.5, it has today's date on it. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro Date: 01/13/2015 6:54 PM (GMT-05:00) To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? Actually, I may have misunderstood. I.e. they say release highlights, not that it was released: https://blogs.citrix.com/2015/01/13/citrix-cloudplatform-4-5-release-highlights/ I take it back! :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie To: CloudStack Dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 23:29:24 Subject: Re: CloudPlatform 4.5 released? That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes on there site? On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' Fedora, not the other way around. Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5 ignoring the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC period. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
[QUESTION] Synchronizing across management servers
Hi,
I have code in my plug-in that I'd like to make sure doesn't run in
multiple threads at the same time.
Of course if there were only the possibility of one management server ever
running at a time, then I could just use synchronized.
What is the recommended CloudStack approach?
I see code like this in places (in a try block):
GlobalLock lock =
GlobalLock.getInternLock(templateIdPoolIdString);
if (!lock.lock(5)) {
s_logger.debug(Couldn't lock the db on the string +
templateIdPoolIdString);
return null;
}
Then the finally block has this:
lock.unlock();
lock.releaseRef();
Does this achieve what I'm looking for?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play*™*
Re: Unable to start VM due to concurrent operation
Hi,
please once check the secondary storage path for download vm is right or
nor?
Thanks,Prapul Sriram
On Thursday, 1 January 2015 2:03 PM, Mohamed Infaz
infaz...@cse.mrt.ac.lk wrote:
Hi Somesh,
Yes i was successful in stopping both the system vm's and starting them
back i also could access them through the console that cloudstack provides.
May be the reason for that code snippet is that i didn't register the
template but i ran this script to install the system vm's.
1.
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt
\
2. -m /srv/images/secondary \
3. -u
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
\
4. -h kvm \
5. -F
this was on the docs. How about upgrading my cloudstack version to 4.4.
This whole thing happened in 4.3.
Thank you.
On 1 January 2015 at 01:39, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote:
You mean the system VMs for Zone 1 are running? Are they showing as
connected in the DB?
If they are, can you stop these VMs and see if they start okay.
From: Mohamed Infaz [infaz...@cse.mrt.ac.lk]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 21:26
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unable to start VM due to concurrent operation
systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 This is the template i
used.
On 31 December 2014 at 07:49, Mohamed Infaz infaz...@cse.mrt.ac.lk
wrote:
Hi Somesh,
Thank you for the reply. Well both of my system vm's are running and it
is
downloading the iso image. And i was able to ping them. The system vm
template i am using is for the version 4.3 cloudstack.
Thank you.
On 30 December 2014 at 23:59, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com
wrote:
Mohamed,
The log snippet you have shared doesn't seem to be relevant to the
concurrent operation exception (can't see that exception stack).
The message that did catch my attention though is,
-
2014-12-31 05:25:07,972 DEBUG [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
(secstorage-1:ctx-463d2f57) System vm template is not ready at data
center
1, wait until it is ready to launch secondary storage vm
2014-12-31 05:25:07,972 DEBUG [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
(secstorage-1:ctx-463d2f57) Zone 1 is not ready to launch secondary
storage
VM yet
-
That's pointing to missing system VM template. Please verify that you
have correctly provisioned the secondary storage with the correct
system VM
template (as per the docs).
-Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Mohamed Infaz [mailto:infaz...@cse.mrt.ac.lk]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:03 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Unable to start VM due to concurrent operation
Hi All,
I have successfully deployed cloudstack 4.3 with two hosts and the setup
runs the management server on another physical host. I had issues with
downloading an ISO but finally i was able to download an ISO image.
When i
want to create an instance i get the following error message saying
Unable
to start VM due to concurrent operation i did some searching on the
topic
and it said version 4.3 system template solved the issue. These are some
of
the MS logs that i collected what could be the issue?
2014-12-31 05:25:07,972 DEBUG [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
(secstorage-1:ctx-463d2f57) System vm template is not ready at data
center
1, wait until it is ready to launch secondary storage vm
2014-12-31 05:25:07,972 DEBUG [c.c.s.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
(secstorage-1:ctx-463d2f57) Zone 1 is not ready to launch secondary
storage
VM yet
2014-12-31 05:25:12,425 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-9:null) Ping from 4
2014-12-31 05:25:12,834 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-5:null) SeqA 3-91695: Processing Seq 3-91695: {
Cmd
, MgmtId: -1, via: 3, Ver: v1, Flags: 11,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.ConsoleProxyLoadReportCommand:{_proxyVmId:1,_loadInfo:{\n
\connections\: []\n},wait:0}}] }
2014-12-31 05:25:12,920 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-5:null) SeqA 3-91695: Sending Seq 3-91695: {
Ans: ,
MgmtId: 248795600505608, via: 3, Ver: v1, Flags: 100010,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.AgentControlAnswer:{result:true,wait:0}}] }
2014-12-31 05:25:15,239 DEBUG [c.c.n.ExternalDeviceUsageManagerImpl]
(ExternalNetworkMonitor-1:ctx-998a86df) External devices stats collector
is
running...
2014-12-31 05:25:15,362 DEBUG
[c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterMonitor-1:ctx-dfdc73ce) Found 0 running routers.
2014-12-31 05:25:15,366 DEBUG
[c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-79d58896) Found 0 routers to update status.
2014-12-31 05:25:15,367 DEBUG
[c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(RouterStatusMonitor-1:ctx-79d58896) Found 0
