Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort
Sure, I'll do my best to attend. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 07:54:13 Subject: Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort All, and specially Paul and Nux, Any chance you can join this meeting, and see what we need to do on the CentOS front ? On Apr 1, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: On 03/27/2015 04:41 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: On Mar 26, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Rich Bowenrbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: A while back I mentioned to some folks (I think it was this list, but it may have been a subset) that the CentOS community is working on a Cloud SIG (Special Interest Group) effort. You can read a little about it athttp://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud The idea is to ensure that cloud infrastructure software, like CloudStack, OpenStack, Open Nebula, and Eucalyptus, works solidly on CentOS, has all of the prerequisite packages available, gets CI on the CentOS platform, and so on. At the moment, this is*only* OpenStack, with the other projects unrepresented. If you are interested in adoption of CloudStack on CentOS (and, by side effect, on Red Hat Enterprise Linux), we'd love to have your participation in this effort. Hi Rich, thanks for the ping again. We have been in touch with KB (Nux! and I mostly) and submitted our scripts for building a cloudstack centOS templates upstream. It works and was merged at some point, but it got pulled back because we stick some scripts in there. Bottom line is that I feel we need to work further upstream in cloud-init to improve cloudstack support there, once that’s done, we can come back to the CentOS builds for cloudstack. fwiw, our install base is probably ~70% centOS and we already have centOS7 support. In the OpenStack world, we see CentOS as a great way to get the message out about OpenStack. Wearing my ASF hat, I'd really like to see the same vehicle be used to get the word out about CloudStack. CentOS goes to a lot of events, and many of them are ones that CloudStack isn't at. I'd love to see the Cloud SIG be a way to get the word about CloudStack into audiences that typically only ever hear about OpenStack. (Yes, I have split loyalties here, and that's fine.) Anyways, a reminder that we will be having this meeting on #centos-devel at 15:00 UTC *tomorrow*, and it would be awesome to at least have some representation from the CloudStack community there to ask the right questions and see what we can do, on the CentOS side, to fix these cloud-init problems and bring CloudStack some more of the CentOS spotlight. Or even just show up so that folks can meet you and we can figure out if there's anything we can do to help one another. --Rich -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: fix yum install require java = 1.7.0 whe...
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/108#issuecomment-88835845 Hi @ghxandsky After this change, if I install the rpm, its installing java 1.6. I am trying on centos6.3 machine. if I give the version as java-1.7.0-openjdk it succeeds. Any idea why? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort
BTW, if anyone has some concrete ideas/questions re Cloudstack and CentOS, please come forth so we can mention them during the meeting. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: sebgoa run...@gmail.com Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 09:08:57 Subject: Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort Sure, I'll do my best to attend. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 07:54:13 Subject: Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort All, and specially Paul and Nux, Any chance you can join this meeting, and see what we need to do on the CentOS front ? On Apr 1, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: On 03/27/2015 04:41 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: On Mar 26, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Rich Bowenrbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: A while back I mentioned to some folks (I think it was this list, but it may have been a subset) that the CentOS community is working on a Cloud SIG (Special Interest Group) effort. You can read a little about it athttp://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud The idea is to ensure that cloud infrastructure software, like CloudStack, OpenStack, Open Nebula, and Eucalyptus, works solidly on CentOS, has all of the prerequisite packages available, gets CI on the CentOS platform, and so on. At the moment, this is*only* OpenStack, with the other projects unrepresented. If you are interested in adoption of CloudStack on CentOS (and, by side effect, on Red Hat Enterprise Linux), we'd love to have your participation in this effort. Hi Rich, thanks for the ping again. We have been in touch with KB (Nux! and I mostly) and submitted our scripts for building a cloudstack centOS templates upstream. It works and was merged at some point, but it got pulled back because we stick some scripts in there. Bottom line is that I feel we need to work further upstream in cloud-init to improve cloudstack support there, once that’s done, we can come back to the CentOS builds for cloudstack. fwiw, our install base is probably ~70% centOS and we already have centOS7 support. In the OpenStack world, we see CentOS as a great way to get the message out about OpenStack. Wearing my ASF hat, I'd really like to see the same vehicle be used to get the word out about CloudStack. CentOS goes to a lot of events, and many of them are ones that CloudStack isn't at. I'd love to see the Cloud SIG be a way to get the word about CloudStack into audiences that typically only ever hear about OpenStack. (Yes, I have split loyalties here, and that's fine.) Anyways, a reminder that we will be having this meeting on #centos-devel at 15:00 UTC *tomorrow*, and it would be awesome to at least have some representation from the CloudStack community there to ask the right questions and see what we can do, on the CentOS side, to fix these cloud-init problems and bring CloudStack some more of the CentOS spotlight. Or even just show up so that folks can meet you and we can figure out if there's anything we can do to help one another. --Rich -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort
All, and specially Paul and Nux, Any chance you can join this meeting, and see what we need to do on the CentOS front ? On Apr 1, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: On 03/27/2015 04:41 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: On Mar 26, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Rich Bowenrbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: A while back I mentioned to some folks (I think it was this list, but it may have been a subset) that the CentOS community is working on a Cloud SIG (Special Interest Group) effort. You can read a little about it athttp://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud The idea is to ensure that cloud infrastructure software, like CloudStack, OpenStack, Open Nebula, and Eucalyptus, works solidly on CentOS, has all of the prerequisite packages available, gets CI on the CentOS platform, and so on. At the moment, this is*only* OpenStack, with the other projects unrepresented. If you are interested in adoption of CloudStack on CentOS (and, by side effect, on Red Hat Enterprise Linux), we'd love to have your participation in this effort. Hi Rich, thanks for the ping again. We have been in touch with KB (Nux! and I mostly) and submitted our scripts for building a cloudstack centOS templates upstream. It works and was merged at some point, but it got pulled back because we stick some scripts in there. Bottom line is that I feel we need to work further upstream in cloud-init to improve cloudstack support there, once that’s done, we can come back to the CentOS builds for cloudstack. fwiw, our install base is probably ~70% centOS and we already have centOS7 support. In the OpenStack world, we see CentOS as a great way to get the message out about OpenStack. Wearing my ASF hat, I'd really like to see the same vehicle be used to get the word out about CloudStack. CentOS goes to a lot of events, and many of them are ones that CloudStack isn't at. I'd love to see the Cloud SIG be a way to get the word about CloudStack into audiences that typically only ever hear about OpenStack. (Yes, I have split loyalties here, and that's fine.) Anyways, a reminder that we will be having this meeting on #centos-devel at 15:00 UTC *tomorrow*, and it would be awesome to at least have some representation from the CloudStack community there to ask the right questions and see what we can do, on the CentOS side, to fix these cloud-init problems and bring CloudStack some more of the CentOS spotlight. Or even just show up so that folks can meet you and we can figure out if there's anything we can do to help one another. --Rich -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rene Moser
Congratulations Rene, well deserved! (your round btw). Regards Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: ilya [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com] Sent: 01 April 2015 22:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rene Moser Congrats Rene! On 3/31/15 2:13 PM, sebgoa wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rene Moser to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Rene has committed several fixes to cloudstack and is the sole author of the cloudstack ansible module. This module should make it to Ansible core quite soon Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable better productivity. Being a PMC member enables assistance with the management and to guide the direction of the project. Join me in congratulating Rene and let's hope for more Ansible play books to deploy cloudstack and associated workloads. -The CloudStack PMC Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rene Moser
welcome and congratulations, Rene, hope to hear a lot more of you in the coming time. Am I to take Paul's word you as a suggestion you are buying drinks? Regards, On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com wrote: Congratulations Rene, well deserved! (your round btw). Regards Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: ilya [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com] Sent: 01 April 2015 22:24 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rene Moser Congrats Rene! On 3/31/15 2:13 PM, sebgoa wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rene Moser to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Rene has committed several fixes to cloudstack and is the sole author of the cloudstack ansible module. This module should make it to Ansible core quite soon Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable better productivity. Being a PMC member enables assistance with the management and to guide the direction of the project. Join me in congratulating Rene and let's hope for more Ansible play books to deploy cloudstack and associated workloads. -The CloudStack PMC Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. -- Daan
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer Pierre-Yves Ritschard
Congrats and welcome Pierr-Yves. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Congrats Pierre-Yves! -- Erik Den tirsdag 31. mars 2015 skrev sebgoa run...@gmail.com følgende: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Pierre-Yves Rischard (@pyr) to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Pierre-Yves is a great developer and I hear he was named one of the top 100 french developers. He has contributed several fixes to cloudstack and more recently committed a Kafka listener, he has a big patch pending to remove the awsapi. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable better productivity. Being a PMC member enables assistance with the management and to guide the direction of the project. Join me in congratulating pyr and pray that he does not re-write cloudstack in clojure :) -The CloudStack PMC -- Daan
Re: Migrating to VPC/Site-to-Site VPN
It is not possible to add existing network/VR to a VPC. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com wrote: That's what I figured. We were hoping to be able to set up site-to-site VPN on the existing network. If a VPC is just a supernet to multiple virtual routers it seems like it would be feasible to seamlessly add an existing network/VR to a VPC. Since this isn't possible now I guess opening a feature request for it would be good, in case we run into a similar issue next year. Before I do, does anyone know if this is technically possible, just not yet coded? In other words, could I theoretically add an existing isolated network/VR to a VPC seamlessly via updating the database or manually changing something on the VR? If so I would think adding the code to handle that task would be relatively easy. Thank You, Logan Barfield Tranquil Hosting On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Sanjeev N sanj...@apache.org wrote: As Erik mentioned, we can add nic from VPC network to existing vms so the vms will be in both isolated(non-vpc) and vpc networks. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Haven't tried it myself, but i think you should be able to create the vpc and change nic on VMs. If you want to keep the ip addresses you might have to use the api Erik Den onsdag 1. april 2015 skrev Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com følgende: We have a customer that is currently set up in an isolated network in an advanced zone. They recently mentioned that they have a need for site-to-site VPN connectivity for their application. Is it possible to move an existing isolated network into a VPC for site-to-site VPN functionality? Or is there another way to set up a site-to-site VPN using the existing network? Thank You, Logan Barfield Tranquil Hosting
Re: Migrating to VPC/Site-to-Site VPN
I believe you could use the same ip space and effectively create a new but similar net. Erik Den onsdag 1. april 2015 skrev Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com følgende: That's what I figured. We were hoping to be able to set up site-to-site VPN on the existing network. If a VPC is just a supernet to multiple virtual routers it seems like it would be feasible to seamlessly add an existing network/VR to a VPC. Since this isn't possible now I guess opening a feature request for it would be good, in case we run into a similar issue next year. Before I do, does anyone know if this is technically possible, just not yet coded? In other words, could I theoretically add an existing isolated network/VR to a VPC seamlessly via updating the database or manually changing something on the VR? If so I would think adding the code to handle that task would be relatively easy. Thank You, Logan Barfield Tranquil Hosting On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Sanjeev N sanj...@apache.org javascript:; wrote: As Erik mentioned, we can add nic from VPC network to existing vms so the vms will be in both isolated(non-vpc) and vpc networks. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: Haven't tried it myself, but i think you should be able to create the vpc and change nic on VMs. If you want to keep the ip addresses you might have to use the api Erik Den onsdag 1. april 2015 skrev Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com javascript:; følgende: We have a customer that is currently set up in an isolated network in an advanced zone. They recently mentioned that they have a need for site-to-site VPN connectivity for their application. Is it possible to move an existing isolated network into a VPC for site-to-site VPN functionality? Or is there another way to set up a site-to-site VPN using the existing network? Thank You, Logan Barfield Tranquil Hosting
Re: vim25.jar missing from mvn repo?
Thanks guys , i was able to compile the needed projects excluding some projects like f5 and netapp: *mvn -P vmware,developer,-f5,-netapp,-srx -D noredist -DskipTests=true clean instal*l I'm yet to try *mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run -Dnoredist* to see weather i can select vmware on cluster creation. Thanks again! On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote: You need to get the dependencies before you build. Following links should help you. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+CloudSt ack#HowtobuildCloudStack-Dependencies https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Hypervisor+VMWare Thanks, ~Talluri On 01/04/15 10:14 pm, Jeronimo Garcia garciaj...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list. I'm trying to build the master on git and I'm getting this: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-vmware-base: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-vmware-base:jar:4.6.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find com.cloud.com.vmware:vmware-vim25:jar:5.1 in https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2 was cached in the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update interval of central has elapsed or updates are forced - [Help 1] command: mvn -DskipTests=true -P vmware clean install Am i missing something? the jar file is not in the remote maven repos .. Thanks!
Re: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password
Hi Nux, As already mentioned we store the encrypted vm password using the ssh key, so we need to reset the password also. Regarding the password field in the DB, we have an API to get the VM password (https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/getVMPassword.html) which gets encrypted password from DB. Thanks, Harikrishna On 02-Apr-2015, at 5:07 am, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Somesh, Why wouldn't the root password field in the DB just be left alone? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 00:06:54 Subject: RE: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password I believe so, since the VM's password (stored in the user_vm_details table) needs to be encrypted using the new keys and I believe encryption is a one-way hash. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 9:16 AM To: dev Subject: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password Hi, I've just noticed resetsshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets the root password. This doesn't sound right. Is this supposed to happen? 4.4.3 RC2 (4.4-RC20150324T1321) CentOS/KVM -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password
Could it not simply be reencoded with the new key? Erik Den torsdag 2. april 2015 skrev Harikrishna Patnala harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com følgende: Hi Nux, As already mentioned we store the encrypted vm password using the ssh key, so we need to reset the password also. Regarding the password field in the DB, we have an API to get the VM password ( https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/getVMPassword.html) which gets encrypted password from DB. Thanks, Harikrishna On 02-Apr-2015, at 5:07 am, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro javascript:; wrote: Somesh, Why wouldn't the root password field in the DB just be left alone? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com javascript:; To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:; Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 00:06:54 Subject: RE: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password I believe so, since the VM's password (stored in the user_vm_details table) needs to be encrypted using the new keys and I believe encryption is a one-way hash. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro javascript:;] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 9:16 AM To: dev Subject: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password Hi, I've just noticed resetsshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets the root password. This doesn't sound right. Is this supposed to happen? 4.4.3 RC2 (4.4-RC20150324T1321) CentOS/KVM -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password
Thanks Harikrishna, I did not know the password would get encrypted with the ssh key. What happens when there is no ssh key registered, how are the passwords encrypted then? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Harikrishna Patnala harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 07:17:54 Subject: Re: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password Hi Nux, As already mentioned we store the encrypted vm password using the ssh key, so we need to reset the password also. Regarding the password field in the DB, we have an API to get the VM password (https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/getVMPassword.html) which gets encrypted password from DB. Thanks, Harikrishna On 02-Apr-2015, at 5:07 am, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Somesh, Why wouldn't the root password field in the DB just be left alone? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 00:06:54 Subject: RE: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password I believe so, since the VM's password (stored in the user_vm_details table) needs to be encrypted using the new keys and I believe encryption is a one-way hash. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 9:16 AM To: dev Subject: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password Hi, I've just noticed resetsshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets the root password. This doesn't sound right. Is this supposed to happen? 4.4.3 RC2 (4.4-RC20150324T1321) CentOS/KVM -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer Pierre-Yves Ritschard
Congrats Pierre-Yves! -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2015 2:41 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer Pierre-Yves Ritschard The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Pierre-Yves Rischard (@pyr) to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Pierre-Yves is a great developer and I hear he was named one of the top 100 french developers. He has contributed several fixes to cloudstack and more recently committed a Kafka listener, he has a big patch pending to remove the awsapi. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable better productivity. Being a PMC member enables assistance with the management and to guide the direction of the project. Join me in congratulating pyr and pray that he does not re-write cloudstack in clojure :) -The CloudStack PMC
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rene Moser
Congrats Rene! -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2015 2:43 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rene Moser The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rene Moser to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Rene has committed several fixes to cloudstack and is the sole author of the cloudstack ansible module. This module should make it to Ansible core quite soon Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable better productivity. Being a PMC member enables assistance with the management and to guide the direction of the project. Join me in congratulating Rene and let's hope for more Ansible play books to deploy cloudstack and associated workloads. -The CloudStack PMC
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Bump priority stragety is no longer used ...
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/142#issuecomment-89047515 Build passed fine and tests, including vm_life_cycle as well. Don't know why Travis complained about 1 of the builds. My output: [INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 10:04 min [INFO] Finished at: 2015-04-02T22:16:08+02:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 116M/838M Travis output: No output has been received in the last 10 minutes, this potentially indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself. I will push the PR and keep an eye on Master. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1076
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1076/changes Changes: [wrodrigues] Bump priority stragety is no longer used for redundant virtual routers -- [...truncated 10390 lines...] Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_schema.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_multipart.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_index.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_multipart_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_bucketpolicy.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_policy_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_offering.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_offering_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/developer-prefill.sql Processing upgrade: com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/pom.xml to /var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-developer/4.6.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-developer-4.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 1:49.929s [INFO] Finished at: Thu Apr 02 17:47:09 EDT 2015 [INFO] Final Memory: 45M/186M [INFO] [WARNING] The requested profile simulator could not be activated because it does not exist. [simulator-singlerun] $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Developer Mode 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- properties-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-2:read-project-properties (default) @ cloud-developer --- [WARNING] Ignoring missing properties file: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/../utils/conf/db.properties.override [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.8:run (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Executing tasks main: [INFO] Executed tasks [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer --- log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.springframework.core.env.StandardEnvironment). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly. log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info. WARNING: Provided file does not exist: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/../utils/conf/db.properties.override Initializing database=simulator with host=localhost port=3306 username=cloud password=cloud Running query: drop database if exists `simulator` Running query: create database `simulator` Running query: GRANT ALL ON simulator.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` identified by 'cloud' Running query: GRANT ALL ON simulator.* to 'cloud'@`%` identified by 'cloud' Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema-simulator.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/templates.simulator.sql Processing SQL file at
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Bump priority stragety is no longer used ...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/142 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Bump priority stragety is no longer used ...
GitHub user wilderrodrigues opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/142 Bump priority stragety is no longer used for redundant virtual routers - With the changes added by the rVPC work, the bump priority became deprecated. This commit includes a refactor to get it removed from the following resources: * Java classes * domain_router table - removing the is_priority_bumpup column * Fixing unit tests All changes were tested with: XenServer 6.2 running under our VMWare zone CloudStack Management Server running on MacBook Pro MySql running on MackBook Pro Storage Type: Local Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM when a Domain level zone is created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 9 tests in 1165.016s OK /tmp//MarvinLogs/test_accounts_7Q4OAG/results.txt (END) Test router internal advanced zone ... SKIP: Marvin configuration has no host credentials to check router services Test restart network ... === TestName: test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test router basic setup ... === TestName: test_05_router_basic | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test router advanced setup ... === TestName: test_06_router_advanced | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test stop router ... === TestName: test_07_stop_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test start router ... === TestName: test_08_start_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test reboot router ... === TestName: test_09_reboot_router | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 7 tests in 438.824s OK (SKIP=1) /tmp//MarvinLogs/test_routers_IYY39F/results.txt (END) Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the zone for migration Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 10 tests in 896.406s OK (SKIP=1) /tmp//MarvinLogs/test_vm_life_cycle_YMQT53/results.txt (END) Test migrate of router after addition of one guest network ... SKIP: No host available for migration. Test requires atleast 2 hosts Test to change service offering of router after addition of one guest network ... === TestName: test_07_chg_srv_off_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test destroy of router after addition of one guest network ... === TestName: test_08_destroy_router_after_addition_of_one_guest_network | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to stop and start router after creation of VPC ... === TestName: test_01_stop_start_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to reboot the router after creating a VPC ... === TestName: test_02_reboot_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test migration of router to another host after creating VPC ... SKIP: No host available for migration. Test requires
Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: fix yum install require java = 1.7.0 whe...
@karuturi After I fix it Requires: java-1.7.0-openjdk , the snapshot picture of attachment. Best Regards, Star Guo === Github user ghxandsky commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/108#issuecomment-89127744 @karuturi I'm sorry for this commit, it should be Requires: java-1.7.0-openjdk . I make a mistake. :( --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: fix yum install require java = 1.7.0 whe...
Github user ghxandsky commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/108#issuecomment-89128055 @karuturi Can you craete a new commit and fix it ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: fix yum install require java = 1.7.0 whe...
Github user ghxandsky commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/108#issuecomment-89127744 @karuturi I'm sorry for this commit, it should be Requires: java-1.7.0-openjdk . I make a mistake. :( --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8380: Adding automation test c...
Github user gauravaradhye commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/117#discussion_r27650484 --- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_storage_migration.py --- @@ -765,7 +597,7 @@ def test_01_migrate_root_and_data_disk_nonlive(self): # Ensure we can add data to newly added disks createChecksum( -self, +self.testdata, --- End diff -- Mention parameterName=Value, same change for all functions calls. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8380: Adding automation test c...
Github user gauravaradhye commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/117#discussion_r27651210 --- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_volume_recurring_snap.py --- @@ -0,0 +1,1015 @@ +# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one +# or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file +# distributed with this work for additional information +# regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file +# to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the +# License); you may not use this file except in compliance +# with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at +# +# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +# +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, +# software distributed under the License is distributed on an +# AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY +# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the +# specific language governing permissions and limitations +# under the License. + Test cases for VM/Volume recurring snapshot Test Path + +from nose.plugins.attrib import attr +from marvin.cloudstackTestCase import cloudstackTestCase, unittest +from marvin.lib.utils import (cleanup_resources, + is_snapshot_on_nfs, + validateList + ) +from marvin.lib.base import (Account, + ServiceOffering, + DiskOffering, + VirtualMachine, + SnapshotPolicy, + Snapshot, + Configurations + ) +from marvin.lib.common import (get_domain, + get_zone, + get_template, + list_volumes, + list_snapshots, + list_snapshot_policy + ) + +from marvin.codes import PASS + +import time + + +class TestVolumeSnapshot(cloudstackTestCase): + +@classmethod +def setUpClass(cls): +testClient = super(TestVolumeSnapshot, cls).getClsTestClient() +cls.apiclient = testClient.getApiClient() +cls.testdata = testClient.getParsedTestDataConfig() +cls.hypervisor = cls.testClient.getHypervisorInfo() + +# Get Zone, Domain and templates +cls.domain = get_domain(cls.apiclient) +cls.zone = get_zone(cls.apiclient, testClient.getZoneForTests()) + +cls.template = get_template( +cls.apiclient, +cls.zone.id, +cls.testdata[ostype]) + +cls._cleanup = [] + +if cls.hypervisor.lower() not in [ +vmware, +kvm, +xenserver]: +raise unittest.SkipTest( +Storage migration not supported on %s % +cls.hypervisor) + +try: +# Create an account +cls.account = Account.create( +cls.apiclient, +cls.testdata[account], +domainid=cls.domain.id +) +cls._cleanup.append(cls.account) +# Create user api client of the account +cls.userapiclient = testClient.getUserApiClient( +UserName=cls.account.name, +DomainName=cls.account.domain +) +# Create Service offering +cls.service_offering = ServiceOffering.create( +cls.apiclient, +cls.testdata[service_offering], +) +cls._cleanup.append(cls.service_offering) +# Create Disk offering +cls.disk_offering = DiskOffering.create( +cls.apiclient, +cls.testdata[disk_offering], +) +cls._cleanup.append(cls.disk_offering) +# Deploy A VM +cls.vm_1 = VirtualMachine.create( +cls.userapiclient, +cls.testdata[small], +templateid=cls.template.id, +accountid=cls.account.name, +domainid=cls.account.domainid, +serviceofferingid=cls.service_offering.id, +zoneid=cls.zone.id, +diskofferingid=cls.disk_offering.id, +mode=cls.zone.networktype +) + +cls.volume = list_volumes( +cls.apiclient, +
Re: vim25.jar missing from mvn repo?
Jeronimo - if you need the jars I maintain them here: https://github.com/bhaisaab/cloudstack-nonoss On 02-Apr-2015, at 2:58 pm, Jeronimo Garcia garciaj...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks guys , i was able to compile the needed projects excluding some projects like f5 and netapp: *mvn -P vmware,developer,-f5,-netapp,-srx -D noredist -DskipTests=true clean instal*l I'm yet to try *mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run -Dnoredist* to see weather i can select vmware on cluster creation. Thanks again! On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote: You need to get the dependencies before you build. Following links should help you. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+CloudSt ack#HowtobuildCloudStack-Dependencies https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Hypervisor+VMWare Thanks, ~Talluri On 01/04/15 10:14 pm, Jeronimo Garcia garciaj...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list. I'm trying to build the master on git and I'm getting this: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-vmware-base: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-vmware-base:jar:4.6.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find com.cloud.com.vmware:vmware-vim25:jar:5.1 in https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2 was cached in the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update interval of central has elapsed or updates are forced - [Help 1] command: mvn -DskipTests=true -P vmware clean install Am i missing something? the jar file is not in the remote maven repos .. Thanks! Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort
I'll try to attend too. Regards Paul Angus Cloud Architect ShapeBlue Ltd M: 07711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com Original message From: Nux! Date:02/04/2015 10:09 (GMT+01:00) To: sebgoa Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org,Paul Angus Subject: Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort Sure, I'll do my best to attend. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 07:54:13 Subject: Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort All, and specially Paul and Nux, Any chance you can join this meeting, and see what we need to do on the CentOS front ? On Apr 1, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: On 03/27/2015 04:41 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: On Mar 26, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Rich Bowenrbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: A while back I mentioned to some folks (I think it was this list, but it may have been a subset) that the CentOS community is working on a Cloud SIG (Special Interest Group) effort. You can read a little about it athttp://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud The idea is to ensure that cloud infrastructure software, like CloudStack, OpenStack, Open Nebula, and Eucalyptus, works solidly on CentOS, has all of the prerequisite packages available, gets CI on the CentOS platform, and so on. At the moment, this is*only* OpenStack, with the other projects unrepresented. If you are interested in adoption of CloudStack on CentOS (and, by side effect, on Red Hat Enterprise Linux), we'd love to have your participation in this effort. Hi Rich, thanks for the ping again. We have been in touch with KB (Nux! and I mostly) and submitted our scripts for building a cloudstack centOS templates upstream. It works and was merged at some point, but it got pulled back because we stick some scripts in there. Bottom line is that I feel we need to work further upstream in cloud-init to improve cloudstack support there, once that’s done, we can come back to the CentOS builds for cloudstack. fwiw, our install base is probably ~70% centOS and we already have centOS7 support. In the OpenStack world, we see CentOS as a great way to get the message out about OpenStack. Wearing my ASF hat, I'd really like to see the same vehicle be used to get the word out about CloudStack. CentOS goes to a lot of events, and many of them are ones that CloudStack isn't at. I'd love to see the Cloud SIG be a way to get the word about CloudStack into audiences that typically only ever hear about OpenStack. (Yes, I have split loyalties here, and that's fine.) Anyways, a reminder that we will be having this meeting on #centos-devel at 15:00 UTC *tomorrow*, and it would be awesome to at least have some representation from the CloudStack community there to ask the right questions and see what we can do, on the CentOS side, to fix these cloud-init problems and bring CloudStack some more of the CentOS spotlight. Or even just show up so that folks can meet you and we can figure out if there's anything we can do to help one another. --Rich -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Buildhttp://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineeringhttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Supporthttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courseshttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: reboot much faster in case of storage fai...
Github user NuxRo commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/140#issuecomment-8641 Looks OK to me, waiting for a dead NFS connection is a PITA. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password
When we create or register ssh key with CS API, CS only stores public key. So, cloudstack does not know the private key to decrypt the password and encrypt it with new ssh key. Thanks, Harikrishna On 02-Apr-2015, at 11:59 am, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote: Could it not simply be reencoded with the new key? Erik Den torsdag 2. april 2015 skrev Harikrishna Patnala harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com følgende: Hi Nux, As already mentioned we store the encrypted vm password using the ssh key, so we need to reset the password also. Regarding the password field in the DB, we have an API to get the VM password ( https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/getVMPassword.html) which gets encrypted password from DB. Thanks, Harikrishna On 02-Apr-2015, at 5:07 am, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro javascript:; wrote: Somesh, Why wouldn't the root password field in the DB just be left alone? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com javascript:; To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org javascript:; Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 00:06:54 Subject: RE: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password I believe so, since the VM's password (stored in the user_vm_details table) needs to be encrypted using the new keys and I believe encryption is a one-way hash. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro javascript:;] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 9:16 AM To: dev Subject: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password Hi, I've just noticed resetsshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets the root password. This doesn't sound right. Is this supposed to happen? 4.4.3 RC2 (4.4-RC20150324T1321) CentOS/KVM -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8380: Adding automation test c...
Github user gauravaradhye commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/117#discussion_r27650780 --- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_volume_recurring_snap.py --- @@ -0,0 +1,1015 @@ +# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one +# or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file +# distributed with this work for additional information +# regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file +# to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the +# License); you may not use this file except in compliance +# with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at +# +# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +# +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, +# software distributed under the License is distributed on an +# AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY +# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the +# specific language governing permissions and limitations +# under the License. + Test cases for VM/Volume recurring snapshot Test Path + +from nose.plugins.attrib import attr +from marvin.cloudstackTestCase import cloudstackTestCase, unittest +from marvin.lib.utils import (cleanup_resources, + is_snapshot_on_nfs, + validateList + ) +from marvin.lib.base import (Account, + ServiceOffering, + DiskOffering, + VirtualMachine, + SnapshotPolicy, + Snapshot, + Configurations + ) +from marvin.lib.common import (get_domain, + get_zone, + get_template, + list_volumes, + list_snapshots, + list_snapshot_policy + ) + +from marvin.codes import PASS + +import time + + +class TestVolumeSnapshot(cloudstackTestCase): + +@classmethod +def setUpClass(cls): +testClient = super(TestVolumeSnapshot, cls).getClsTestClient() +cls.apiclient = testClient.getApiClient() +cls.testdata = testClient.getParsedTestDataConfig() +cls.hypervisor = cls.testClient.getHypervisorInfo() + +# Get Zone, Domain and templates +cls.domain = get_domain(cls.apiclient) +cls.zone = get_zone(cls.apiclient, testClient.getZoneForTests()) + +cls.template = get_template( +cls.apiclient, +cls.zone.id, +cls.testdata[ostype]) + +cls._cleanup = [] + +if cls.hypervisor.lower() not in [ +vmware, +kvm, +xenserver]: +raise unittest.SkipTest( +Storage migration not supported on %s % +cls.hypervisor) + +try: +# Create an account +cls.account = Account.create( +cls.apiclient, +cls.testdata[account], +domainid=cls.domain.id +) +cls._cleanup.append(cls.account) +# Create user api client of the account +cls.userapiclient = testClient.getUserApiClient( +UserName=cls.account.name, +DomainName=cls.account.domain +) +# Create Service offering +cls.service_offering = ServiceOffering.create( +cls.apiclient, +cls.testdata[service_offering], +) +cls._cleanup.append(cls.service_offering) +# Create Disk offering +cls.disk_offering = DiskOffering.create( +cls.apiclient, +cls.testdata[disk_offering], +) +cls._cleanup.append(cls.disk_offering) +# Deploy A VM +cls.vm_1 = VirtualMachine.create( +cls.userapiclient, +cls.testdata[small], +templateid=cls.template.id, +accountid=cls.account.name, +domainid=cls.account.domainid, +serviceofferingid=cls.service_offering.id, +zoneid=cls.zone.id, +diskofferingid=cls.disk_offering.id, +mode=cls.zone.networktype +) + +cls.volume = list_volumes( +cls.apiclient, +
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8380: Adding automation test c...
Github user gauravaradhye commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/117#discussion_r27650755 --- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_volume_recurring_snap.py --- @@ -0,0 +1,1015 @@ +# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one +# or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file +# distributed with this work for additional information +# regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file +# to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the +# License); you may not use this file except in compliance +# with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at +# +# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +# +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, +# software distributed under the License is distributed on an +# AS IS BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY +# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the +# specific language governing permissions and limitations +# under the License. + Test cases for VM/Volume recurring snapshot Test Path + +from nose.plugins.attrib import attr +from marvin.cloudstackTestCase import cloudstackTestCase, unittest +from marvin.lib.utils import (cleanup_resources, + is_snapshot_on_nfs, + validateList + ) +from marvin.lib.base import (Account, + ServiceOffering, + DiskOffering, + VirtualMachine, + SnapshotPolicy, + Snapshot, + Configurations + ) +from marvin.lib.common import (get_domain, + get_zone, + get_template, + list_volumes, + list_snapshots, + list_snapshot_policy + ) + +from marvin.codes import PASS + +import time + + +class TestVolumeSnapshot(cloudstackTestCase): --- End diff -- Change class name according to functional group of tests. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8380: Adding automation test c...
Github user gauravaradhye commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/117#discussion_r27650440 --- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_storage_migration.py --- @@ -659,11 +478,11 @@ def test_01_migrate_root_and_data_disk_nonlive(self): vm_cluster.start(self.userapiclient) compareChecksum( -self, +self.apiclient, +self.testdata, checksum_random_root_cluster, --- End diff -- Please specify parameter names so as to understand what all data are we passing exactly. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8380: Adding automation test c...
Github user gauravaradhye commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/117#discussion_r27650373 --- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_storage_migration.py --- @@ -536,8 +353,10 @@ def test_01_migrate_root_and_data_disk_nonlive(self): In addition to this, Create snapshot of root and data disk after migration. -For root disk, create template from snapshot, deploy Vm and compare checksum -For data disk, Create volume from snapshot, attach to VM and compare checksum +For root disk, create template from snapshot, \ --- End diff -- No need of backward slash as it is already in comment block. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8380: Adding automation test c...
Github user gauravaradhye commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/117#issuecomment-0495 Will review remaining changes tomorrow. A quick question, running the test suite should not leave anything behind in the setup. Is this taken care of? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort
Hi Adrian Pretty sure that if getting the management server up and running was as simple as... 1. Install CentOS 2. yum install cloudstack 3. setup-cloudstack-all-in-one.sh ...we'd see many more people at least trying it out. Some might see the current installation options as easy enough but if someone could get it up and running without even looking at the docs, I reckon they'd be more likely to do it and then consult the docs when they got stuck. This reminds me of https://github.com/thehyperadvisor/cldstk-deploy , though there could certainly more/better ideas on how to ease things up, at least for a PoC. I'm sure Sebastien will quickly propose docker. :) If the packages could be put into the centos-extras repo that would do the trick. I'm sure there's more to it than my simplistic idea but could we discuss the viability of this? I think this will be difficult to achieve, though I am short on proper details, I believe the way we (in cloudstack) ship some stuff - particularly java stuff - is not exactly kosher from a RedHat packaging point of view. They have their own routine, practices and so on. Furthermore, let's say we get that right, keeping it up to date in their repo will also be quite an effort. I think the idea is good and in an ideal world it's how we'd do it, but right now with the release cadence of Cloudstack and our few resources, it's something that - simply - it's not worth doing. We could do with a one-stop script that does everything for the user including installing the mysql/mariadb server aspect even setting up NFS shares on the same box (leaving the other more granular setup scripts for 'advanced' users. If centos-extras is not feasible, how about EPEL? Might even get some Fedora people interested as well (if it works on Fedora). See the ansible link I gave above. Re EPEL and Fedora, they're having trouble maintaining their own stuff, i.e. they removed openstack from there and are maintaining separate repositories at https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/ Pretty sure that this particular CentOS SIG is about running the management/infrastructure side of things as opposed to running centos as a guest in case anyone is unsure. Although clearly related, earlier comments about cloud-init are surely more related to another CentOS SIG (Cloud Instance) aren't they? Yep, CentOS Cloud Instance SIG is a different project meant to get CentOS running on all major cloud platforms. This one is somehow successful in that their official image will boot in Cloudstack and get a ssh key if one is set, even execute user data, but there are many bugs and other problems. Far from ideal; it would be great if someone with python skills would take up polishing the cloud-init Cloudstack source a bit, perhaps as part of GSoC. My stance on all this is, bother less with packaging or inclusion in CentOS official repos and focus more on getting it to work as smoothly as possible. Also, attending the CentOS events with presentations on Cloudstack is a great idea to raise some awareness. /imho Lucian
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1071
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1071/changes Changes: [Rajani Karuturi] reverted 555c4329462ac632890c7cde3bac8db8b6e8a682 for centos6.3 as the rpm installs java 1.6 -- [...truncated 10410 lines...] Running query: drop database if exists `cloud_usage` Running query: create database `cloud_usage` Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloud_usage.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` identified by 'cloud' Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloud_usage.* to 'cloud'@`%` identified by 'cloud' Initializing database=cloudbridge with host=localhost port=3306 username=cloud password=cloud Running query: drop database if exists `cloudbridge` Running query: create database `cloudbridge` Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloudbridge.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` identified by 'cloud' Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloudbridge.* to 'cloud'@`%` identified by 'cloud' Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema-premium.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/templates.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_schema.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_multipart.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_index.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_multipart_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_bucketpolicy.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_policy_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_offering.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_offering_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/developer-prefill.sql Processing upgrade: com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/pom.xml to /var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-developer/4.6.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-developer-4.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 2:02.566s [INFO] Finished at: Thu Apr 02 05:58:54 EDT 2015 [INFO] Final Memory: 46M/201M [INFO] [WARNING] The requested profile simulator could not be activated because it does not exist. [simulator-singlerun] $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Developer Mode 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- properties-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-2:read-project-properties (default) @ cloud-developer --- [WARNING] Ignoring missing properties file: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/../utils/conf/db.properties.override [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.8:run (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Executing tasks main: [INFO] Executed tasks [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: reboot much faster in case of storage fai...
Github user runseb commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/140#issuecomment-6601 pinging @llambiel and @pyr @wido LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
RE: CentOS Cloud SIG effort
Pretty sure that if getting the management server up and running was as simple as... 1. Install CentOS 2. yum install cloudstack 3. setup-cloudstack-all-in-one.sh ...we'd see many more people at least trying it out. Some might see the current installation options as easy enough but if someone could get it up and running without even looking at the docs, I reckon they'd be more likely to do it and then consult the docs when they got stuck. If the packages could be put into the centos-extras repo that would do the trick. I'm sure there's more to it than my simplistic idea but could we discuss the viability of this? We could do with a one-stop script that does everything for the user including installing the mysql/mariadb server aspect even setting up NFS shares on the same box (leaving the other more granular setup scripts for 'advanced' users. If centos-extras is not feasible, how about EPEL? Might even get some Fedora people interested as well (if it works on Fedora). Pretty sure that this particular CentOS SIG is about running the management/infrastructure side of things as opposed to running centos as a guest in case anyone is unsure. Although clearly related, earlier comments about cloud-init are surely more related to another CentOS SIG (Cloud Instance) aren't they? Adrian -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 02 April 2015 09:20 To: sebgoa Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Paul Angus Subject: Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort BTW, if anyone has some concrete ideas/questions re Cloudstack and CentOS, please come forth so we can mention them during the meeting. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro To: sebgoa run...@gmail.com Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 09:08:57 Subject: Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort Sure, I'll do my best to attend. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 07:54:13 Subject: Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort All, and specially Paul and Nux, Any chance you can join this meeting, and see what we need to do on the CentOS front ? On Apr 1, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: On 03/27/2015 04:41 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: On Mar 26, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Rich Bowenrbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: A while back I mentioned to some folks (I think it was this list, but it may have been a subset) that the CentOS community is working on a Cloud SIG (Special Interest Group) effort. You can read a little about it athttp://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Cloud The idea is to ensure that cloud infrastructure software, like CloudStack, OpenStack, Open Nebula, and Eucalyptus, works solidly on CentOS, has all of the prerequisite packages available, gets CI on the CentOS platform, and so on. At the moment, this is*only* OpenStack, with the other projects unrepresented. If you are interested in adoption of CloudStack on CentOS (and, by side effect, on Red Hat Enterprise Linux), we'd love to have your participation in this effort. Hi Rich, thanks for the ping again. We have been in touch with KB (Nux! and I mostly) and submitted our scripts for building a cloudstack centOS templates upstream. It works and was merged at some point, but it got pulled back because we stick some scripts in there. Bottom line is that I feel we need to work further upstream in cloud-init to improve cloudstack support there, once that’s done, we can come back to the CentOS builds for cloudstack. fwiw, our install base is probably ~70% centOS and we already have centOS7 support. In the OpenStack world, we see CentOS as a great way to get the message out about OpenStack. Wearing my ASF hat, I'd really like to see the same vehicle be used to get the word out about CloudStack. CentOS goes to a lot of events, and many of them are ones that CloudStack isn't at. I'd love to see the Cloud SIG be a way to get the word about CloudStack into audiences that typically only ever hear about OpenStack. (Yes, I have split loyalties here, and that's fine.) Anyways, a reminder that we will be having this meeting on #centos-devel at 15:00 UTC *tomorrow*, and it would be awesome to at least have some representation from the CloudStack community there to ask the right questions and see what we can do, on the CentOS side, to fix these cloud-init problems and bring CloudStack some more of the CentOS spotlight. Or even just show up so that folks can meet you and we can figure out if there's anything we can do to help one another. --Rich -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8380: Adding automation test c...
Github user gauravaradhye commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/117#discussion_r27650336 --- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_storage_migration.py --- @@ -479,6 +283,19 @@ def setUpClass(cls): ) cls._cleanup.append(cls.disk_offering_cluster1) +cls.new_virtual_machine = VirtualMachine.create( +cls.apiclient, +cls.testdata[small], +templateid=cls.template.id, +accountid=cls.account.name, +domainid=cls.account.domainid, +serviceofferingid=cls.service_offering.id, +zoneid=cls.zone.id, +mode=cls.zone.networktype +) + +cls.new_virtual_machine.start(cls.apiclient) --- End diff -- Vm is by default in running state as long as we do not pass startvm=False. Hence no need to start VM explicitly after deploying. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password
Password is encrypted and stored only if the vm is deployed from password enabled template and ssh public key is provided, Otherwise we don’t encrypt or store the password. -Harikrishna On 02-Apr-2015, at 1:48 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Thanks Harikrishna, I did not know the password would get encrypted with the ssh key. What happens when there is no ssh key registered, how are the passwords encrypted then? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Harikrishna Patnala harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 07:17:54 Subject: Re: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password Hi Nux, As already mentioned we store the encrypted vm password using the ssh key, so we need to reset the password also. Regarding the password field in the DB, we have an API to get the VM password (https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/getVMPassword.html) which gets encrypted password from DB. Thanks, Harikrishna On 02-Apr-2015, at 5:07 am, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Somesh, Why wouldn't the root password field in the DB just be left alone? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 00:06:54 Subject: RE: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password I believe so, since the VM's password (stored in the user_vm_details table) needs to be encrypted using the new keys and I believe encryption is a one-way hash. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 9:16 AM To: dev Subject: reset sshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets password Hi, I've just noticed resetsshkeyforvirtualmachine also resets the root password. This doesn't sound right. Is this supposed to happen? 4.4.3 RC2 (4.4-RC20150324T1321) CentOS/KVM -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro
Re: vim25.jar missing from mvn repo?
Thanks buddy , saved on my puppet manifest , thanks again! . I'm trying to set up a mini dev environment , using the Vmware VCSIM ... its going well so far ... but as the VCSIM fails quite a lot i expect cloudstack to fail accordingly too , having said that i keep you posted if this works. Has any of you played with this before? On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote: Jeronimo - if you need the jars I maintain them here: https://github.com/bhaisaab/cloudstack-nonoss On 02-Apr-2015, at 2:58 pm, Jeronimo Garcia garciaj...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks guys , i was able to compile the needed projects excluding some projects like f5 and netapp: *mvn -P vmware,developer,-f5,-netapp,-srx -D noredist -DskipTests=true clean instal*l I'm yet to try *mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run -Dnoredist* to see weather i can select vmware on cluster creation. Thanks again! On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com wrote: You need to get the dependencies before you build. Following links should help you. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+CloudSt ack#HowtobuildCloudStack-Dependencies https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Hypervisor+VMWare Thanks, ~Talluri On 01/04/15 10:14 pm, Jeronimo Garcia garciaj...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list. I'm trying to build the master on git and I'm getting this: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-vmware-base: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-vmware-base:jar:4.6.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find com.cloud.com.vmware:vmware-vim25:jar:5.1 in https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2 was cached in the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update interval of central has elapsed or updates are forced - [Help 1] command: mvn -DskipTests=true -P vmware clean install Am i missing something? the jar file is not in the remote maven repos .. Thanks! Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services IaaS Cloud Design Build http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build// CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment frameworkhttp://shapeblue.com/csforge/ CloudStack Consultinghttp://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/ CloudStack Software Engineering http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/ CloudStack Infrastructure Support http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/ CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/ This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8380: Adding automation test c...
Github user gauravaradhye commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/117#discussion_r27650534 --- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_storage_migration.py --- @@ -1771,17 +1666,17 @@ def test_03_migrate_root_and_data_disk_nonlive_cwps_vmware(self): vm_cluster.start(self.userapiclient) compareChecksum( -self, --- End diff -- Good to see self is not passed to external module function. Good work! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: master branch: VR not starting
Looks like the system vm template that you are using are not good.
Try the templates from http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
On 02-Apr-2015, at 7:00 pm, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
Hi Jayapal,
Here is the management server log when I create a new VPC. I have the
complete log file if you want.
Thanks,
2015-04-02 09:24:33,464 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-13:ctx-d346aa74 ctx-cb3cf0b3) ===END=== 172.16.11.102 --
GET
command=createNetworkresponse=jsonsessionkey=QVBoxMj48NpXdjom%2FGHN7OzZBWI%3DzoneId=6c2c1eb0-4466-4914-9c1c-ff73d716ed9aname=asddisplayText=asdnetworkOfferingId=8139494f-2036-4b06-87ea-2b635603196f_=1427981074407
2015-04-02 09:26:33,842 ERROR [c.c.u.s.SshHelper]
(DirectAgent-142:ctx-bc757c1a) SSH execution of command
/opt/cloud/bin/router_proxy.sh update_config.py 169.254.3.118
ip_associations.json has an error status code in return. result output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /opt/cloud/bin/update_config.py, line 20, in module
from merge import QueueFile
File /opt/cloud/bin/merge.py, line 23, in module
import cs_ip
File /opt/cloud/bin/cs_ip.py, line 19, in module
from netaddr import *
ImportError: No module named netaddr
2015-04-02 09:26:33,862 ERROR [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-10:ctx-15cd8652 job-43/job-44 ctx-6cbd18bc) null
2015-04-02 09:26:39,999 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-10:ctx-15cd8652 job-43/job-44 ctx-6cbd18bc) Failed to
start instance VM[DomainRouter|r-10-VM]
com.cloud.utils.exception.ExecutionException: Unable to start
VM[DomainRouter|r-10-VM] due to error in finalizeStart, not retrying
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1076)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:4503)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.java:107)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:4659)
at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:103)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:537)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:494)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
2015-04-02 09:26:40,179 ERROR [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher]
(Work-Job-Executor-10:ctx-15cd8652 job-43/job-44) Unable to complete
AsyncJobVO {id:44, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType: null, instanceId:
null, cmd: com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart, cmdInfo:
rO0ABXNyABhjb20uY2xvdWQudm0uVm1Xb3JrU3RhcnR9cMGsvxz73gIAC0oABGRjSWRMAAZhdm9pZHN0ADBMY29tL2Nsb3VkL2RlcGxveS9EZXBsb3ltZW50UGxhbm5lciRFeGNsdWRlTGlzdDtMAAljbHVzdGVySWR0ABBMamF2YS9sYW5nL0xvbmc7TAAGaG9zdElkcQB-AAJMAAtqb3VybmFsTmFtZXQAEkxqYXZhL2xhbmcvU3RyaW5nO0wAEXBoeXNpY2FsTmV0d29ya0lkcQB-AAJMAAdwbGFubmVycQB-AANMAAVwb2RJZHEAfgACTAAGcG9vbElkcQB-AAJMAAlyYXdQYXJhbXN0AA9MamF2YS91dGlsL01hcDtMAA1yZXNlcnZhdGlvbklkcQB-AAN4cgATY29tLmNsb3VkLnZtLlZtV29ya5-ZtlbwJWdrAgAESgAJYWNjb3VudElkSgAGdXNlcklkSgAEdm1JZEwAC2hhbmRsZXJOYW1lcQB-AAN4cAACAAIACnQAGVZpcnR1YWxNYWNoaW5lTWFuYWdlckltcGwAAHBwcHBwcHBwc3IAEWphdmEudXRpbC5IYXNoTWFwBQfawcMWYNEDAAJGAApsb2FkRmFjdG9ySQAJdGhyZXNob2xkeHA_QAAADHcIEAF0AA5SZXN0YXJ0TmV0d29ya3QAP3JPMEFCWE55QUJGcVlYWmhMbXhoYm1jdVFtOXZiR1ZoYnMwZ2NvRFZuUHJ1QWdBQldnQUZkbUZzZFdWNGNBRXhw,
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0,
result: null, initMsid: 7684065591473, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated:
null, lastPolled: null, created: Thu Apr 02 09:25:24 EDT 2015}, job
origin:43
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
Can you
Re: master branch: VR not starting
The router start is failing because of the error (import error) in executing
update_config.py.
Template that you are using seems older version of cloudstack.
As Abhi mentioned, Use the template which has the supported packages installed.
*
(DirectAgent-142:ctx-bc757c1a) SSH execution of command
/opt/cloud/bin/router_proxy.sh update_config.py 169.254.3.118
ip_associations.json has an error status code in return. result output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 03-Apr-2015, at 9:19 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Looks like the system vm template that you are using are not good.
Try the templates from http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
On 02-Apr-2015, at 7:00 pm, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
Hi Jayapal,
Here is the management server log when I create a new VPC. I have the
complete log file if you want.
Thanks,
2015-04-02 09:24:33,464 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-13:ctx-d346aa74 ctx-cb3cf0b3) ===END=== 172.16.11.102 --
GET
command=createNetworkresponse=jsonsessionkey=QVBoxMj48NpXdjom%2FGHN7OzZBWI%3DzoneId=6c2c1eb0-4466-4914-9c1c-ff73d716ed9aname=asddisplayText=asdnetworkOfferingId=8139494f-2036-4b06-87ea-2b635603196f_=1427981074407
2015-04-02 09:26:33,842 ERROR [c.c.u.s.SshHelper]
(DirectAgent-142:ctx-bc757c1a) SSH execution of command
/opt/cloud/bin/router_proxy.sh update_config.py 169.254.3.118
ip_associations.json has an error status code in return. result output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /opt/cloud/bin/update_config.py, line 20, in module
from merge import QueueFile
File /opt/cloud/bin/merge.py, line 23, in module
import cs_ip
File /opt/cloud/bin/cs_ip.py, line 19, in module
from netaddr import *
ImportError: No module named netaddr
2015-04-02 09:26:33,862 ERROR [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-10:ctx-15cd8652 job-43/job-44 ctx-6cbd18bc) null
2015-04-02 09:26:39,999 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-10:ctx-15cd8652 job-43/job-44 ctx-6cbd18bc) Failed to
start instance VM[DomainRouter|r-10-VM]
com.cloud.utils.exception.ExecutionException: Unable to start
VM[DomainRouter|r-10-VM] due to error in finalizeStart, not retrying
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1076)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:4503)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.java:107)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:4659)
at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:103)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:537)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:494)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
2015-04-02 09:26:40,179 ERROR [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher]
(Work-Job-Executor-10:ctx-15cd8652 job-43/job-44) Unable to complete
AsyncJobVO {id:44, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType: null, instanceId:
null, cmd: com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart, cmdInfo:
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1075
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1075/changes Changes: [wrodrigues] First piece of the refactor of the CitrisResourceBase [wrodrigues] Adding CitrixCreateCommandWrapper.java and basic unit tests [wrodrigues] Adding the refactor of CitrixCheckConsoleProxyLoadCommandWrapper.java and CitrixWatchConsoleProxyLoadCommandWrapper.java [wrodrigues] Refactoring the whole XsHost thing [wrodrigues] Refactoring the GetHostStatsCommand [wrodrigues] Refactoring the GetVmStatsCommand [wrodrigues] Refactor the CheckHealthCommand and GetVmDiskStatsCommand classes in CitrixResourceBase [wrodrigues] Refactoring the StopCommand on CitrixResourceBase to cope with new design [wrodrigues] Renaming files [wrodrigues] Refactoring the CitrixRebootCommand in order to have the new design applied [wrodrigues] Refactoring the CitrixCheckVirtualMachineCommand toc ope with new design [wrodrigues] Refactoring PrepareForMigrationCommand and MigrateCommand in order to cope with the new design [wrodrigues] Refactoring DestroyCommand and CreateStoragePoolCommand wrappers to cope with the new design [wrodrigues] Refactoring DeleteStoragePoolCommand, ModifyStoragePoolCommand and ResizeVolumeCommand to cope with new design [wrodrigues] Refactoring AttachIsoCommand, AttachVolumeCommand and UpgradeSnapshotCommand to cope with new design [wrodrigues] Refactoring GetStorageStatsCommand and PrimaryStorageDownloadCommand to cope with the new design [wrodrigues] Refactoring GetVncPortCommand, MaintainCommand and SetupCommand to cope with new design. [wrodrigues] Make methods in subclasses public. [wrodrigues] Refactoring PingTestCommand to cope with new design [wrodrigues] Refactoring CheckOnHostCommand, ModifySshKeysCommand, OvsSetTagAndFlowCommand and StartCommand to cope with new design [wrodrigues] Refactoring CheckSshCommand, OvsFetchInterfaceCommand and SecurityGroupRulesCommand to cope with new design. [wrodrigues] Refactoring CleanupNetworkRulesCmd, OvsCreateGreTunnelCommand, OvsDeleteFlowCommand, OvsVpcPhysicalTopologyConfigCommand and OvsVpcRoutingPolicyConfigCommand [wrodrigues] Refactoring NetworkRulesSystemVmCommand, OvsCreateTunnelCommand, OvsDestroyBridgeCommand, OvsDestroyTunnelCommand, OvsSetupBridgeCommand in order to [wrodrigues] Refactoring other 8 command wrapper in order to cope with the new design [wrodrigues] Refactored the remaining commands [wrodrigues] Removing all private/protected/public execute() methods from CitrixResourceBase class [wrodrigues] Refactoring XenServer56 and 56FP1 Resources in order to cope with new FenceCommandWrapper [wrodrigues] Refactoring XenServer56NetworkUsageCommandWrapper in order to cope with the new design [wrodrigues] We don't need the Start, Stop, Reboot command in the CitrixRebaseClaas anymore. [wrodrigues] Adding more tests to cover other possibilities concerning different versions of the XenServer -- [...truncated 10378 lines...] Running query: drop database if exists `cloud_usage` Running query: create database `cloud_usage` Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloud_usage.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` identified by 'cloud' Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloud_usage.* to 'cloud'@`%` identified by 'cloud' Initializing database=cloudbridge with host=localhost port=3306 username=cloud password=cloud Running query: drop database if exists `cloudbridge` Running query: create database `cloudbridge` Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloudbridge.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` identified by 'cloud' Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloudbridge.* to 'cloud'@`%` identified by 'cloud' Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema-premium.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/templates.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_schema.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_multipart.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_index.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_multipart_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_bucketpolicy.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_policy_alter.sql Processing
Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort
On Apr 2, 2015, at 3:46 PM, Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk wrote: Hi Lucian, This is still a very devops/developer centric approach which in my opinion is rife within the ACS community (understandably) and which is inadvertently hostile/elitist to many who might otherwise be interested. I think that many regular sys admins who perhaps don't want to get involved with docker, github, compiling stuff, running 3rd party provisioning scripts etc and just want to run up a quick POC would end up being alienated by this - they don’t have the time to learn these sorts of technologies if they would never use them otherwise. Obviously to most of the audience in this list that's not the case but I really think that there are a lot of potential (albeit likely small) deployments out there where the admins run a mile if getting something to work involves the word 'git' or even 'mailing-list’. So technically you don’t need git or mailing list to get this done. but you do need to read the docs. I don’t want to find excuses here, but openstack is not easier to try. Installing the mgt server and the agent is not the tough part. To me the tough part is to understand your datacenter and how you are gong to configure your network. That part is tough to simplify. so bottom line I agree with you, and would love to see some patches to get this done. These people just go out and buy vCloud Director instead or do without. Citrix would probably get more customers for CloudPlatform as well if it were very simple to try out ACS ACS needs hobbyists and sys admins in SMBs as well in my opinion, not just devops people in large corporations or service providers. More people playing with it and in turn talking/blogging about it and raising its profile will help immensely. These people need to be convinced that #Cloudstackworks. Get packages into Debian/Ubuntu and there's an even greater audience. Grab the long tail and the rest of the beast comes with it. We have made some progress there with a “re-factoring” of our debian packages. But there is still work to be done Just my opinion btw - perhaps I'm too old-fashioned and need to learn more. Adrian -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 02 April 2015 13:01 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: sebgoa; Paul Angus Subject: Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort Hi Adrian Pretty sure that if getting the management server up and running was as simple as... 1. Install CentOS 2. yum install cloudstack 3. setup-cloudstack-all-in-one.sh ...we'd see many more people at least trying it out. Some might see the current installation options as easy enough but if someone could get it up and running without even looking at the docs, I reckon they'd be more likely to do it and then consult the docs when they got stuck. This reminds me of https://github.com/thehyperadvisor/cldstk-deploy , though there could certainly more/better ideas on how to ease things up, at least for a PoC. I'm sure Sebastien will quickly propose docker. :) If the packages could be put into the centos-extras repo that would do the trick. I'm sure there's more to it than my simplistic idea but could we discuss the viability of this? I think this will be difficult to achieve, though I am short on proper details, I believe the way we (in cloudstack) ship some stuff - particularly java stuff - is not exactly kosher from a RedHat packaging point of view. They have their own routine, practices and so on. Furthermore, let's say we get that right, keeping it up to date in their repo will also be quite an effort. I think the idea is good and in an ideal world it's how we'd do it, but right now with the release cadence of Cloudstack and our few resources, it's something that - simply - it's not worth doing. We could do with a one-stop script that does everything for the user including installing the mysql/mariadb server aspect even setting up NFS shares on the same box (leaving the other more granular setup scripts for 'advanced' users. If centos-extras is not feasible, how about EPEL? Might even get some Fedora people interested as well (if it works on Fedora). See the ansible link I gave above. Re EPEL and Fedora, they're having trouble maintaining their own stuff, i.e. they removed openstack from there and are maintaining separate repositories at https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/ Pretty sure that this particular CentOS SIG is about running the management/infrastructure side of things as opposed to running centos as a guest in case anyone is unsure. Although clearly related, earlier comments about cloud-init are surely more related to another CentOS SIG (Cloud Instance) aren't they? Yep, CentOS Cloud Instance SIG is a different project meant to get CentOS running on all major cloud platforms. This one is somehow successful in that their official image will boot in Cloudstack
Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort
Adrian, You're not too old-fashioned, in fact you have a good point that may not appear so obvious to others on this list. I personally resigned to the idea that to do cloud you really, _really_ need to know what you're doing, otherwise it will end in tears. I experienced this first hand, but perhaps there is a way to make this easier the others. Let's keep at this and perhaps we can come up with something to tease the hobbyists and the SMB admins. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Adrian Lewis adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: sebgoa run...@gmail.com, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2015 14:46:09 Subject: RE: CentOS Cloud SIG effort Hi Lucian, This is still a very devops/developer centric approach which in my opinion is rife within the ACS community (understandably) and which is inadvertently hostile/elitist to many who might otherwise be interested. I think that many regular sys admins who perhaps don't want to get involved with docker, github, compiling stuff, running 3rd party provisioning scripts etc and just want to run up a quick POC would end up being alienated by this - they don’t have the time to learn these sorts of technologies if they would never use them otherwise. Obviously to most of the audience in this list that's not the case but I really think that there are a lot of potential (albeit likely small) deployments out there where the admins run a mile if getting something to work involves the word 'git' or even 'mailing-list'. These people just go out and buy vCloud Director instead or do without. Citrix would probably get more customers for CloudPlatform as well if it were very simple to try out ACS. ACS needs hobbyists and sys admins in SMBs as well in my opinion, not just devops people in large corporations or service providers. More people playing with it and in turn talking/blogging about it and raising its profile will help immensely. These people need to be convinced that #Cloudstackworks. Get packages into Debian/Ubuntu and there's an even greater audience. Grab the long tail and the rest of the beast comes with it. Just my opinion btw - perhaps I'm too old-fashioned and need to learn more. Adrian -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 02 April 2015 13:01 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: sebgoa; Paul Angus Subject: Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort Hi Adrian Pretty sure that if getting the management server up and running was as simple as... 1. Install CentOS 2. yum install cloudstack 3. setup-cloudstack-all-in-one.sh ...we'd see many more people at least trying it out. Some might see the current installation options as easy enough but if someone could get it up and running without even looking at the docs, I reckon they'd be more likely to do it and then consult the docs when they got stuck. This reminds me of https://github.com/thehyperadvisor/cldstk-deploy , though there could certainly more/better ideas on how to ease things up, at least for a PoC. I'm sure Sebastien will quickly propose docker. :) If the packages could be put into the centos-extras repo that would do the trick. I'm sure there's more to it than my simplistic idea but could we discuss the viability of this? I think this will be difficult to achieve, though I am short on proper details, I believe the way we (in cloudstack) ship some stuff - particularly java stuff - is not exactly kosher from a RedHat packaging point of view. They have their own routine, practices and so on. Furthermore, let's say we get that right, keeping it up to date in their repo will also be quite an effort. I think the idea is good and in an ideal world it's how we'd do it, but right now with the release cadence of Cloudstack and our few resources, it's something that - simply - it's not worth doing. We could do with a one-stop script that does everything for the user including installing the mysql/mariadb server aspect even setting up NFS shares on the same box (leaving the other more granular setup scripts for 'advanced' users. If centos-extras is not feasible, how about EPEL? Might even get some Fedora people interested as well (if it works on Fedora). See the ansible link I gave above. Re EPEL and Fedora, they're having trouble maintaining their own stuff, i.e. they removed openstack from there and are maintaining separate repositories at https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/ Pretty sure that this particular CentOS SIG is about running the management/infrastructure side of things as opposed to running centos as a guest in case anyone is unsure. Although clearly related, earlier comments about cloud-init are surely more related to another CentOS SIG (Cloud Instance) aren't they? Yep, CentOS Cloud Instance SIG is a different project meant to get
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1074
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1074/changes Changes: [github] reboot much faster in case of storage failure -- [...truncated 10377 lines...] Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloudbridge.* to 'cloud'@`%` identified by 'cloud' Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema-premium.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/templates.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_schema.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_multipart.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_index.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_multipart_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_bucketpolicy.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_policy_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_offering.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_offering_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/developer-prefill.sql Processing upgrade: com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/pom.xml to /var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-developer/4.6.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-developer-4.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 1:59.981s [INFO] Finished at: Thu Apr 02 10:46:51 EDT 2015 [INFO] Final Memory: 45M/203M [INFO] [WARNING] The requested profile simulator could not be activated because it does not exist. [simulator-singlerun] $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Developer Mode 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- properties-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-2:read-project-properties (default) @ cloud-developer --- [WARNING] Ignoring missing properties file: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/../utils/conf/db.properties.override [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.8:run (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Executing tasks main: [INFO] Executed tasks [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer --- log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.springframework.core.env.StandardEnvironment). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly. log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info. WARNING: Provided file does not exist: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/../utils/conf/db.properties.override Initializing database=simulator with host=localhost port=3306 username=cloud password=cloud Running query: drop database if exists `simulator` Running query: create database `simulator` Running query: GRANT ALL ON
RE: Vms resource usage history
AFAIK, it doesn't. VM stats are fetched from the hypervisor at specified frequency and only exist in memory. Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 10:08 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Vms resource usage history Hi folks, Does Cloudstack store the resource usage of VMs? I mean, when I call the API command: https://cloudstack/client/api?command=listVirtualMachinesdetails=stats;... It returns the resource usage statistics for a VM (the amount of resource used in that moment/the last monitored resource usage), but I am wondering if CS maintains a history of them. -- Rafael Weingärtner
Re: Simulator failing
Fix for this was to use this command: mvn -P simulator -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run And not: mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:42 PM, cs user acldstk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I'm trying to run the simulator, I've tried with git tags 4.3, 4.3.2 and 4.4.1. Each time I hit this error when adding a cluster. Adding a zone and pod work fine. Deploy DC Started Exception Occurred ['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', ' File marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 185, in createClusters\n clusterresponse = self.__apiClient.addCluster(clustercmd)\n', ' File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Marvin-4.4.1-py2.6.egg/marvin/cloudstackAPI/cloudstackAPIClient.py, line 1506, in addCluster\nresponse = self.connection.marvinRequest(command, response_type=response, method=method)\n', ' File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Marvin-4.4.1-py2.6.egg/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py, line 378, in marvinRequest\nraise e\n', 'CloudstackAPIException: Execute cmd: addcluster failed, due to: errorCode: 431, errorText:Could not find corresponding resource manager for simulator\n'] ===deploy dc failed, so cleaning the created entries=== Specifically : errorCode: 431, errorText:Could not find corresponding resource manager for simulator Has anyone seen this before? Is there a fix? This thread talks about commenting out references to simulator in componentContext.xml http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201302.mbox/%3c97f4356aea71904482cd192135c038f9011cc1d12...@banpmailbox01.citrite.net%3E But I've checked in there and I can't see any references. Cheers
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8357 Add Test cases for vMotio...
Github user abhinavroy02 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/139#issuecomment-88910071 Thanks @wilderrodrigues :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer Pierre-Yves Ritschard
Congratulations Pierre-Yves! Regards, Somesh -Original Message- From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 5:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer Pierre-Yves Ritschard Congrats Pierre-Yves! -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2015 2:41 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer Pierre-Yves Ritschard The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Pierre-Yves Rischard (@pyr) to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Pierre-Yves is a great developer and I hear he was named one of the top 100 french developers. He has contributed several fixes to cloudstack and more recently committed a Kafka listener, he has a big patch pending to remove the awsapi. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable better productivity. Being a PMC member enables assistance with the management and to guide the direction of the project. Join me in congratulating pyr and pray that he does not re-write cloudstack in clojure :) -The CloudStack PMC
RE: CentOS Cloud SIG effort
Hi Lucian, This is still a very devops/developer centric approach which in my opinion is rife within the ACS community (understandably) and which is inadvertently hostile/elitist to many who might otherwise be interested. I think that many regular sys admins who perhaps don't want to get involved with docker, github, compiling stuff, running 3rd party provisioning scripts etc and just want to run up a quick POC would end up being alienated by this - they don’t have the time to learn these sorts of technologies if they would never use them otherwise. Obviously to most of the audience in this list that's not the case but I really think that there are a lot of potential (albeit likely small) deployments out there where the admins run a mile if getting something to work involves the word 'git' or even 'mailing-list'. These people just go out and buy vCloud Director instead or do without. Citrix would probably get more customers for CloudPlatform as well if it were very simple to try out ACS. ACS needs hobbyists and sys admins in SMBs as well in my opinion, not just devops people in large corporations or service providers. More people playing with it and in turn talking/blogging about it and raising its profile will help immensely. These people need to be convinced that #Cloudstackworks. Get packages into Debian/Ubuntu and there's an even greater audience. Grab the long tail and the rest of the beast comes with it. Just my opinion btw - perhaps I'm too old-fashioned and need to learn more. Adrian -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: 02 April 2015 13:01 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: sebgoa; Paul Angus Subject: Re: CentOS Cloud SIG effort Hi Adrian Pretty sure that if getting the management server up and running was as simple as... 1. Install CentOS 2. yum install cloudstack 3. setup-cloudstack-all-in-one.sh ...we'd see many more people at least trying it out. Some might see the current installation options as easy enough but if someone could get it up and running without even looking at the docs, I reckon they'd be more likely to do it and then consult the docs when they got stuck. This reminds me of https://github.com/thehyperadvisor/cldstk-deploy , though there could certainly more/better ideas on how to ease things up, at least for a PoC. I'm sure Sebastien will quickly propose docker. :) If the packages could be put into the centos-extras repo that would do the trick. I'm sure there's more to it than my simplistic idea but could we discuss the viability of this? I think this will be difficult to achieve, though I am short on proper details, I believe the way we (in cloudstack) ship some stuff - particularly java stuff - is not exactly kosher from a RedHat packaging point of view. They have their own routine, practices and so on. Furthermore, let's say we get that right, keeping it up to date in their repo will also be quite an effort. I think the idea is good and in an ideal world it's how we'd do it, but right now with the release cadence of Cloudstack and our few resources, it's something that - simply - it's not worth doing. We could do with a one-stop script that does everything for the user including installing the mysql/mariadb server aspect even setting up NFS shares on the same box (leaving the other more granular setup scripts for 'advanced' users. If centos-extras is not feasible, how about EPEL? Might even get some Fedora people interested as well (if it works on Fedora). See the ansible link I gave above. Re EPEL and Fedora, they're having trouble maintaining their own stuff, i.e. they removed openstack from there and are maintaining separate repositories at https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/ Pretty sure that this particular CentOS SIG is about running the management/infrastructure side of things as opposed to running centos as a guest in case anyone is unsure. Although clearly related, earlier comments about cloud-init are surely more related to another CentOS SIG (Cloud Instance) aren't they? Yep, CentOS Cloud Instance SIG is a different project meant to get CentOS running on all major cloud platforms. This one is somehow successful in that their official image will boot in Cloudstack and get a ssh key if one is set, even execute user data, but there are many bugs and other problems. Far from ideal; it would be great if someone with python skills would take up polishing the cloud-init Cloudstack source a bit, perhaps as part of GSoC. My stance on all this is, bother less with packaging or inclusion in CentOS official repos and focus more on getting it to work as smoothly as possible. Also, attending the CentOS events with presentations on Cloudstack is a great idea to raise some awareness. /imho Lucian
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1072
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1072/changes Changes: [Will Stevens] Added the CONTRIBUTING.md doc to the project root [Will Stevens] Fixed the pull request step to make sure the correct branch is selected [Will Stevens] CONTRIBUTING.md: changed wording around modifying pull requests -- [...truncated 10366 lines...] Running query: drop database if exists `cloud_usage` Running query: create database `cloud_usage` Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloud_usage.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` identified by 'cloud' Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloud_usage.* to 'cloud'@`%` identified by 'cloud' Initializing database=cloudbridge with host=localhost port=3306 username=cloud password=cloud Running query: drop database if exists `cloudbridge` Running query: create database `cloudbridge` Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloudbridge.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` identified by 'cloud' Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloudbridge.* to 'cloud'@`%` identified by 'cloud' Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema-premium.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/templates.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_schema.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_multipart.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_index.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_multipart_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_bucketpolicy.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_policy_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_offering.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_offering_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/developer-prefill.sql Processing upgrade: com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/pom.xml to /var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-developer/4.6.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-developer-4.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 1:52.309s [INFO] Finished at: Thu Apr 02 09:57:51 EDT 2015 [INFO] Final Memory: 46M/235M [INFO] [WARNING] The requested profile simulator could not be activated because it does not exist. [simulator-singlerun] $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Developer Mode 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- properties-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-2:read-project-properties (default) @ cloud-developer --- [WARNING] Ignoring missing properties file: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/../utils/conf/db.properties.override [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.8:run (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Executing tasks main: [INFO] Executed tasks [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO]
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8357 Add Test cases for vMotio...
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/139#issuecomment-88902351 Hi @abhinavroy02, Against which environment did you execute your tests? I had a look at the code, and all looks fine, but just wanted to know if you tested it against XenServer/KVM or simulator only. Cheers, Wilder --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8357 Add Test cases for vMotio...
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/139#issuecomment-88909498 Hi Abhinav, Cool! :) I will close it. Cheers, Wilder --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: master branch: VR not starting
Hi Jayapal,
Here is the management server log when I create a new VPC. I have the
complete log file if you want.
Thanks,
2015-04-02 09:24:33,464 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-13:ctx-d346aa74 ctx-cb3cf0b3) ===END=== 172.16.11.102 --
GET
command=createNetworkresponse=jsonsessionkey=QVBoxMj48NpXdjom%2FGHN7OzZBWI%3DzoneId=6c2c1eb0-4466-4914-9c1c-ff73d716ed9aname=asddisplayText=asdnetworkOfferingId=8139494f-2036-4b06-87ea-2b635603196f_=1427981074407
2015-04-02 09:26:33,842 ERROR [c.c.u.s.SshHelper]
(DirectAgent-142:ctx-bc757c1a) SSH execution of command
/opt/cloud/bin/router_proxy.sh update_config.py 169.254.3.118
ip_associations.json has an error status code in return. result output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /opt/cloud/bin/update_config.py, line 20, in module
from merge import QueueFile
File /opt/cloud/bin/merge.py, line 23, in module
import cs_ip
File /opt/cloud/bin/cs_ip.py, line 19, in module
from netaddr import *
ImportError: No module named netaddr
2015-04-02 09:26:33,862 ERROR [c.c.n.r.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-10:ctx-15cd8652 job-43/job-44 ctx-6cbd18bc) null
2015-04-02 09:26:39,999 ERROR [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-10:ctx-15cd8652 job-43/job-44 ctx-6cbd18bc) Failed to
start instance VM[DomainRouter|r-10-VM]
com.cloud.utils.exception.ExecutionException: Unable to start
VM[DomainRouter|r-10-VM] due to error in finalizeStart, not retrying
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:1076)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.orchestrateStart(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:4503)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.java:107)
at
com.cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java:4659)
at com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:103)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:537)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
at
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:494)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
2015-04-02 09:26:40,179 ERROR [c.c.v.VmWorkJobDispatcher]
(Work-Job-Executor-10:ctx-15cd8652 job-43/job-44) Unable to complete
AsyncJobVO {id:44, userId: 2, accountId: 2, instanceType: null, instanceId:
null, cmd: com.cloud.vm.VmWorkStart, cmdInfo:
rO0ABXNyABhjb20uY2xvdWQudm0uVm1Xb3JrU3RhcnR9cMGsvxz73gIAC0oABGRjSWRMAAZhdm9pZHN0ADBMY29tL2Nsb3VkL2RlcGxveS9EZXBsb3ltZW50UGxhbm5lciRFeGNsdWRlTGlzdDtMAAljbHVzdGVySWR0ABBMamF2YS9sYW5nL0xvbmc7TAAGaG9zdElkcQB-AAJMAAtqb3VybmFsTmFtZXQAEkxqYXZhL2xhbmcvU3RyaW5nO0wAEXBoeXNpY2FsTmV0d29ya0lkcQB-AAJMAAdwbGFubmVycQB-AANMAAVwb2RJZHEAfgACTAAGcG9vbElkcQB-AAJMAAlyYXdQYXJhbXN0AA9MamF2YS91dGlsL01hcDtMAA1yZXNlcnZhdGlvbklkcQB-AAN4cgATY29tLmNsb3VkLnZtLlZtV29ya5-ZtlbwJWdrAgAESgAJYWNjb3VudElkSgAGdXNlcklkSgAEdm1JZEwAC2hhbmRsZXJOYW1lcQB-AAN4cAACAAIACnQAGVZpcnR1YWxNYWNoaW5lTWFuYWdlckltcGwAAHBwcHBwcHBwc3IAEWphdmEudXRpbC5IYXNoTWFwBQfawcMWYNEDAAJGAApsb2FkRmFjdG9ySQAJdGhyZXNob2xkeHA_QAAADHcIEAF0AA5SZXN0YXJ0TmV0d29ya3QAP3JPMEFCWE55QUJGcVlYWmhMbXhoYm1jdVFtOXZiR1ZoYnMwZ2NvRFZuUHJ1QWdBQldnQUZkbUZzZFdWNGNBRXhw,
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0,
result: null, initMsid: 7684065591473, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated:
null, lastPolled: null, created: Thu Apr 02 09:25:24 EDT 2015}, job
origin:43
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
Can you please check the MS logs for the VR start.
You might be getting exception for VR start due which the MS is stopping
the router.
Can you please send the management server logs.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 02-Apr-2015, at 12:44 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8357 Add Test cases for vMotio...
Github user abhinavroy02 commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/139#issuecomment-88908912 Hi @wilderrodrigues , I have tested it on VMware environment as it is for the vMotion support on VMFS type primary storage. Thanks, Abhinav --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: reboot much faster in case of storage fai...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/140 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Vms resource usage history
Hi folks, Does Cloudstack store the resource usage of VMs? I mean, when I call the API command: https://cloudstack/client/api?command=listVirtualMachinesdetails=stats;... It returns the resource usage statistics for a VM (the amount of resource used in that moment/the last monitored resource usage), but I am wondering if CS maintains a history of them. -- Rafael Weingärtner
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: reboot much faster in case of storage fai...
Github user wido commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/140#issuecomment-88928090 Yes, it is, but we should log somewhere. Now a machine just reboots. We should send something to syslog prior to rebooting. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1073
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/1073/changes Changes: [abhinav.roy] CLOUDSTACK-8357 Add Test cases for vMotion support on VMFS as primary storage -- [...truncated 10369 lines...] Running query: drop database if exists `cloud_usage` Running query: create database `cloud_usage` Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloud_usage.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` identified by 'cloud' Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloud_usage.* to 'cloud'@`%` identified by 'cloud' Initializing database=cloudbridge with host=localhost port=3306 username=cloud password=cloud Running query: drop database if exists `cloudbridge` Running query: create database `cloudbridge` Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloudbridge.* to 'cloud'@`localhost` identified by 'cloud' Running query: GRANT ALL ON cloudbridge.* to 'cloud'@`%` identified by 'cloud' Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/create-schema-premium.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/templates.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_schema.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_multipart.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_index.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_multipart_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_bucketpolicy.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_policy_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_offering.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/target/db/cloudbridge_offering_alter.sql Processing SQL file at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/developer-prefill.sql Processing upgrade: com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install (default-install) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Installing http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/pom.xml to /var/lib/jenkins/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-developer/4.6.0-SNAPSHOT/cloud-developer-4.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom [INFO] [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 1:53.285s [INFO] Finished at: Thu Apr 02 10:21:34 EDT 2015 [INFO] Final Memory: 45M/222M [INFO] [WARNING] The requested profile simulator could not be activated because it does not exist. [simulator-singlerun] $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb-simulator [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Developer Mode 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] --- properties-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-2:read-project-properties (default) @ cloud-developer --- [WARNING] Ignoring missing properties file: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/ws/developer/../utils/conf/db.properties.override [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.8:run (default) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Executing tasks main: [INFO] Executed tasks [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-developer --- [INFO] Starting audit... Audit done. [INFO] [INFO] exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @ cloud-developer [INFO] [INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:java (create-schema-simulator) @
RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rene Moser
Congratulation Rene! Somesh CloudPlatform Escalations Citrix Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 5:31 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rene Moser Congrats Rene! -Original Message- From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 1 April 2015 2:43 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rene Moser The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rene Moser to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Rene has committed several fixes to cloudstack and is the sole author of the cloudstack ansible module. This module should make it to Ansible core quite soon Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable better productivity. Being a PMC member enables assistance with the management and to guide the direction of the project. Join me in congratulating Rene and let's hope for more Ansible play books to deploy cloudstack and associated workloads. -The CloudStack PMC
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Added the CONTRIBUTING.md doc to the proj...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/141 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8357 Add Test cases for vMotio...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/139 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Simulator failing
Hi All, I'm trying to run the simulator, I've tried with git tags 4.3, 4.3.2 and 4.4.1. Each time I hit this error when adding a cluster. Adding a zone and pod work fine. Deploy DC Started Exception Occurred ['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', ' File marvin/deployDataCenter.py, line 185, in createClusters\n clusterresponse = self.__apiClient.addCluster(clustercmd)\n', ' File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Marvin-4.4.1-py2.6.egg/marvin/cloudstackAPI/cloudstackAPIClient.py, line 1506, in addCluster\nresponse = self.connection.marvinRequest(command, response_type=response, method=method)\n', ' File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Marvin-4.4.1-py2.6.egg/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py, line 378, in marvinRequest\nraise e\n', 'CloudstackAPIException: Execute cmd: addcluster failed, due to: errorCode: 431, errorText:Could not find corresponding resource manager for simulator\n'] ===deploy dc failed, so cleaning the created entries=== Specifically : errorCode: 431, errorText:Could not find corresponding resource manager for simulator Has anyone seen this before? Is there a fix? This thread talks about commenting out references to simulator in componentContext.xml http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201302.mbox/%3c97f4356aea71904482cd192135c038f9011cc1d12...@banpmailbox01.citrite.net%3E But I've checked in there and I can't see any references. Cheers
RE: [ANNOUNCE] Rohit Yadav as new PMC member of CloudStack
Congratulations Rohit! Very well deserved! Regards, Somesh -Original Message- From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 11:44 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rohit Yadav as new PMC member of CloudStack On 2015-03-27 4:07 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack are pleased to announce that Rohit Yadav has accepted our invitation to join the PMC. Please join me in congratulating him. On behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC Was about time! :) Congrats Rohit! -- Francois Gaudreault Gestionnaire de Produit | Product Manager - Cloud Platform Services t:514-629-6775 CloudOps Votre partenaire infonuagique | Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy | Montreal | Quebec | H3J 1S6 w: cloudops.com | tw: @CloudOps_
[GIT] Apache.org timing out
Hi all, Has anyone else noticed that? https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git/': Failed connect to git-wip-us.apache.orghttp://git-wip-us.apache.org:443; Operation timed out It was working fine 1h ago. Cheers, Wilder
Re: [GIT] Apache.org timing out
yes, David is on it On Apr 2, 2015, at 6:42 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Has anyone else noticed that? https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git/': Failed connect to git-wip-us.apache.orghttp://git-wip-us.apache.org:443; Operation timed out It was working fine 1h ago. Cheers, Wilder
Re: [GIT] Apache.org timing out
Yes. See: http://status.apache.org --David On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Has anyone else noticed that? https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git/': Failed connect to git-wip-us.apache.orghttp://git-wip-us.apache.org:443; Operation timed out It was working fine 1h ago. Cheers, Wilder
Re: [GIT] Apache.org timing out
last week there was a ddos attack on github not sure if its still ongoin issue https://threatpost.com/ddos-attack-on-github-linked-to-earlier-one-against-greatfire-org/111919 On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:11 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote: Yes. See: http://status.apache.org --David On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote: Hi all, Has anyone else noticed that? https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git/': Failed connect to git-wip-us.apache.orghttp://git-wip-us.apache.org:443; Operation timed out It was working fine 1h ago. Cheers, Wilder
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: reboot much faster in case of storage fai...
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/140#issuecomment-89006232 Ok, check! I will add it like that. Although you can never be sure log packets go out over the network because if the storage is unavailable due to local host having network issues (or switch died, or,...) remote logging is most likely to fail as well. But logging locally should succeed this way. :-) Regards, Remi On 02 Apr 2015, at 17:35, NuxRo notificati...@github.com wrote: Cool. Then it seems like we have a deal. It remains to test if the actual log entry survives the sudden reboot. â Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/citrix resource base rebase
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/137 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/citrix resource base rebase
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/137#issuecomment-88999899 Skimmed over diff, looks good. Built after merging branch and was able to deploy a basic zone and do basic vm lifecycle tests. TravisCI is green as well, so merging. @wilderrodrigues thanks for the PR, in case this breaks master (after merge) please watch out :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Refactor/citrix resource base rebase
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/137#issuecomment-89023853 Thanks a lot, man! Will keep an eye on Master. Cheers, Wilder --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
