date:20161003

RE: 4.8, 4.9, and master Testing Status

2016-10-03 Thread Marty Godsey

Is XenServer 7 on the roadmap? I have seen significant performance differences 
between my ACS cluster running XS 6.5 SP1 and a separate XS 7 cluster (non-ACS) 
connecting to the same storage array. Other than the XS hosts being different 
versions all is the same. Same switches, same storage array, etc..

I am just curious.

Regards,
Marty Godsey
nSource Solutions

-Original Message-
From: John Burwell [mailto:john.burw...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 12:48 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Murali Reddy ; Rohit Yadav 
; Paul Angus ; Boris 
Stoyanov ; Abhinandan Prateek 

Subject: Re: 4.8, 4.9, and master Testing Status

All,

A quick update on our progress to pass all smoke tests aka super green.  We 
have reduced the failures and errors for XenServer from 93 to 9 and for VMware 
from 51 to 14.  A CentOS 6/CentOS 6 KVM run is currently executing.  Based on 
manual tests/fixes, we are expecting to be the first super green configuration. 
 We have also found the following additional defects:

  * CLOUDSTACK-9528 [2]: SSVM Downloads (built-in) Template Multiple Times
  * CLOUDSTACK-9529 [3]: Marvin Tests Do Not Clean Up Properly

9528 is causing XenServer environments to fail to install and startup cleanly.  
A lack of cleanup described in 9529 is causing XenServer to exhaust available 
resources before a test run completes.  We believe that resolution of these 
issues will address most, if not all, of the XenServer issues.

Thanks,
-John

[1]: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65873020
[2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9528
[3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9529

> 
john.burw...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
  
 

On Sep 30, 2016, at 2:40 AM, John Burwell  wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> Using blueorganutan, Rohit, Murali, Boris, Paul, Abhi, and I are executing 
> the smoke tests for the 4.8, 4.9, and master branches against the following 
> environments:
> 
>   * CentOS 7.2 Management Server + VMware 5.5u3 + NFS Primary/Secondary 
> Storage
>   * CentOS 7.2 Management Server + XenServer 6.5SP1 + NFS 
> Primary/Secondary Storage
>   * CentOS 7.2 Management Server + CentOS 7.2 KVM + NFS 
> Primary/Secondary Storage
> 
> Thus far, we have found seven (7) test case and/or CloudStack defects in the 
> VMware run for the 4.8 branch [1].  We are currently triaging fifty-one (51) 
> new issues from the XenServer run to determine which issues were 
> environmental and defects.  This triage work should be completed today (30 
> Sept 2016).  Finally, we are awaiting the results of the KVM run.  
> 
> We are using PR #1692 [2] as the master tracking PR to fix all defects in the 
> 4.8 branch.  Our goal is to get all non-skip tests to pass and then merge 
> this PR to the 4.8, 4.9, and master.  For each bug, we are creating a JIRA 
> ticket and adding a commit to the PR.  Currently, the branch for this PR is 
> in the shapeblue repo (the branch started with a much smaller fix from Paul 
> and we just kept using it).  However, if others are interested in picking up 
> defects, we will move it to ASF repo.  Once the 4.8 branch is stabilized, we 
> plan to re-execute these tests on the 4.9 and master branches as we expect 
> that the 4.9 and master branches will have additional issues.
> 
> Since we are in a test freeze, I propose that no further PRs are merged to 
> the 4.8, 4.9, and master branches until they are stabilized.  The following 
> PRs will be re-based, re-tested, and merged to 4.8, 4.9.1.0, and/or 4.10.0.0 
> post-stabilization:
> 
>   * 1696
>   * 1694
>   * 1684
>   * 1681
>   * 1680
>   * 1678
>   * 1677
>   * 1676
>   * 1674
>   * 1673
>   * 1642
>   * 1624
>   * 1615
>   * 1600
>   * 1545
>   * 1542
> 
> I recognize that this a large backlog of contributions ready to merge, and 
> apologize for asking folks to wait.  However, given current state of the 
> release branches, merging them before we complete fixing the smoke tests 
> would create a moving target that further delay stabilization.  
> 
> Obviously, it is unlikely we will make the 10 October 2016 release date for 
> the 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, and 4.10.0.0 releases.  At this point, it is difficult 
> to estimate the size of the schedule slip because we still have issues to 
> triage and test runs to complete.  I have created a wiki page [2] to track 
> progress on this effort.  
> 
> Does this approach sound reasonable?  Any suggestions to speed up this 
> process will be greatly appreciated as stabilizing and re-opening these 
> branches stable ASAP is critical for the community.
> 
> Thanks,
> -John
> 
> [1]: 
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1699: CLOUDSTACK-9513 Migrate transifex workflow and forma...

2016-10-03 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1699
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-47


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: 4.8, 4.9, and master Testing Status

2016-10-03 Thread John Burwell

All,

A quick update on our progress to pass all smoke tests aka super green.  We 
have reduced the failures and errors for XenServer from 93 to 9 and for VMware 
from 51 to 14.  A CentOS 6/CentOS 6 KVM run is currently executing.  Based on 
manual tests/fixes, we are expecting to be the first super green configuration. 
 We have also found the following additional defects:

  * CLOUDSTACK-9528 [2]: SSVM Downloads (built-in) Template Multiple Times 
  * CLOUDSTACK-9529 [3]: Marvin Tests Do Not Clean Up Properly

9528 is causing XenServer environments to fail to install and startup cleanly.  
A lack of cleanup described in 9529 is causing XenServer to exhaust available 
resources before a test run completes.  We believe that resolution of these 
issues will address most, if not all, of the XenServer issues.

Thanks,
-John

[1]: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65873020
[2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9528
[3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9529

> 
john.burw...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London VA WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On Sep 30, 2016, at 2:40 AM, John Burwell  wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> Using blueorganutan, Rohit, Murali, Boris, Paul, Abhi, and I are executing 
> the smoke tests for the 4.8, 4.9, and master branches against the following 
> environments:
> 
>   * CentOS 7.2 Management Server + VMware 5.5u3 + NFS Primary/Secondary 
> Storage
>   * CentOS 7.2 Management Server + XenServer 6.5SP1 + NFS 
> Primary/Secondary Storage
>   * CentOS 7.2 Management Server + CentOS 7.2 KVM + NFS Primary/Secondary 
> Storage
> 
> Thus far, we have found seven (7) test case and/or CloudStack defects in the 
> VMware run for the 4.8 branch [1].  We are currently triaging fifty-one (51) 
> new issues from the XenServer run to determine which issues were 
> environmental and defects.  This triage work should be completed today (30 
> Sept 2016).  Finally, we are awaiting the results of the KVM run.  
> 
> We are using PR #1692 [2] as the master tracking PR to fix all defects in the 
> 4.8 branch.  Our goal is to get all non-skip tests to pass and then merge 
> this PR to the 4.8, 4.9, and master.  For each bug, we are creating a JIRA 
> ticket and adding a commit to the PR.  Currently, the branch for this PR is 
> in the shapeblue repo (the branch started with a much smaller fix from Paul 
> and we just kept using it).  However, if others are interested in picking up 
> defects, we will move it to ASF repo.  Once the 4.8 branch is stabilized, we 
> plan to re-execute these tests on the 4.9 and master branches as we expect 
> that the 4.9 and master branches will have additional issues.
> 
> Since we are in a test freeze, I propose that no further PRs are merged to 
> the 4.8, 4.9, and master branches until they are stabilized.  The following 
> PRs will be re-based, re-tested, and merged to 4.8, 4.9.1.0, and/or 4.10.0.0 
> post-stabilization:
> 
>   * 1696
>   * 1694
>   * 1684
>   * 1681
>   * 1680
>   * 1678
>   * 1677
>   * 1676
>   * 1674
>   * 1673
>   * 1642
>   * 1624
>   * 1615
>   * 1600
>   * 1545
>   * 1542
> 
> I recognize that this a large backlog of contributions ready to merge, and 
> apologize for asking folks to wait.  However, given current state of the 
> release branches, merging them before we complete fixing the smoke tests 
> would create a moving target that further delay stabilization.  
> 
> Obviously, it is unlikely we will make the 10 October 2016 release date for 
> the 4.8.2.0, 4.9.1.0, and 4.10.0.0 releases.  At this point, it is difficult 
> to estimate the size of the schedule slip because we still have issues to 
> triage and test runs to complete.  I have created a wiki page [2] to track 
> progress on this effort.  
> 
> Does this approach sound reasonable?  Any suggestions to speed up this 
> process will be greatly appreciated as stabilizing and re-opening these 
> branches stable ASAP is critical for the community.
> 
> Thanks,
> -John
> 
> [1]: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9518?jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(4.8.2.0)%20AND%20labels%20in%20(4.8.2.0-smoke-test-failure)
> [2]: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=65873020
> 
>> On Sep 26, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Will Stevens  wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, I think it is important that you or Rajani sign off on anything that
>> gets in while branches are frozen so you guys can stay on top of what goes
>> in.
>> 
>> Thanks for all the hard work team.  :)
>> 
>> *Will STEVENS*
>> Lead Developer
>> 
>> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 2:10 AM, John Burwell 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> Per

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
@jburwell a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos6 mgmt + kvm-centos6) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread jburwell

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
@blueorangutan test centos6 kvm-centos6


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1698: CLOUDSTACK-9525 add support for windows 10 guest os ...

2016-10-03 Thread jburwell

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1698
  
@serg38 @karuturi can you also include the mappings for KVM and HyperV?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread jburwell

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
@serg38 @abhinandanprateek diagnosed the same issue earlier today.  
Reviewing #871, it is composed of commits 
fbc2e2e983938e6a16b7e44eb19db9e659b7a570 and 
7147627aa2756c21d28560c1d126c2cdc5cfe771 which are in both in the 4.8 branch 
according to the following `git branch` checks:
```
â  cloudstack git:(master) â git branch --contains 
fbc2e2e983938e6a16b7e44eb19db9e659b7a570
  4.8
  4.9
  jsb/4.8.2.0-version
  jsb/4.9.1.0-version
  jsb/maven-parent-version
* master
â  cloudstack git:(master) â git branch --contains 
7147627aa2756c21d28560c1d126c2cdc5cfe771
  4.8
  4.9
  jsb/4.8.2.0-version
  jsb/4.9.1.0-version
  jsb/maven-parent-version
* master
```
Since the `test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot` continues to fail with this 
changes from #871 included, it appears we need to do some work on this test 
case.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
@jburwell Sorry my bad. It is PR 871 . The reason the test fails is:
```
After running test_vm_snapshots.py we're getting exception on 
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot as it was expected before your changes in this 
PR.

We're getting: 'CloudstackAPIException: Execute cmd: createsnapshot failed, 
due to: errorCode: 431, errorText:Volume snapshot is not allowed, please detach 
it from VM with VM Snapshots\n']

This is consistent with VolumeApiServiceImpl.allocSnapshot method, in which 
it is:

if (volume.getInstanceId() != null) {
// Check that Vm to which this volume is attached does not have 
VM Snapshots
if (_vmSnapshotDao.findByVm(volume.getInstanceId()).size() > 0) 
{
throw new InvalidParameterValueException("Volume snapshot 
is not allowed, please detach it from VM with VM Snapshots");
}
}
```


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread jburwell

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
@serg38 #571 has no Marvin test case changes and fixes the CPVM.  How does 
it address the `test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot` error?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
BTW failure of test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot  is due to PR571 which 
modified marvin test to succeed against incorrect functionality. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
Trillian test result (tid-100)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 30113 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1692-t100-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Test completed. 43 look ok, 5 have errors


Test | Result | Time (s)
--- | --- | ---
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 560.613
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1420.469
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 689.397
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 392.860
test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false | `Failure` | 
446.690
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 517.580
test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true | `Failure` | 
440.841
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | `Error` | 121.233
ContextSuite context=TestVpcRemoteAccessVpn>:teardown | `Error` | 157.028
test_router_dhcphosts | Success | 137.914
test_releaseIP | Success | 264.236
test_reboot_router | Success | 537.166
test_public_ip_user_account | Success | 10.305
test_public_ip_admin_account | Success | 40.807
test_nic_secondaryip_add_remove | Success | 249.124
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_3_Load_Balancer_Rule | Success | 
71.875
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_2_nat_rule | Success | 61.559
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_1_static_nat_rule | Success | 92.022
test_network_acl | Success | 161.886
test_isolate_network_password_server | Success | 61.212
test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan | Success | 15.376
test_deployvm_userdispersing | Success | 91.504
test_deployvm_userdata_post | Success | 15.644
test_deployvm_userdata | Success | 106.238
test_deployvm_userconcentrated | Success | 30.966
test_deployvm_firstfit | Success | 153.922
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 218.580
test_deploy_vm_from_iso | Success | 378.307
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.027
test_delete_account | Success | 208.596
test_dedicatePublicIpRange | Success | 0.526
test_dedicateGuestVlanRange | Success | 10.347
test_create_pvlan_network | Success | 5.241
test_createRegion | Success | 0.036
test_createPortablePublicIPRange | Success | 15.242
test_createPortablePublicIPAcquire | Success | 15.576
test_assign_and_removal_lb | Success | 149.243
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.021
test_UpdateStorageOverProvisioningFactor | Success | 0.170
test_UpdateConfigParamWithScope | Success | 0.158
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup_in_project | Success | 182.046
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup | Success | 181.965
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 80.811
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 196.642
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 76.787
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 60.515
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.266
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 203.895
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 20.757
test_08_start_router | Success | 45.463
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 111.107
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 111.583
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 61.173
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.028
test_07_stop_router | Success | 15.201
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.134
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 111.232
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 153.886
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.035
test_07_list_default_iso | Success | 0.058
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 166.696
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.061
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 25.446
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.157
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.066
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 168.918
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.040
test_05_iso_permissions | Success | 0.068
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.254
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | Success | 896.132
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | Success | 465.229
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.532
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.153
test_04_extract_Iso | Success | 5.223
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.220
test_04_create_fat_type_disk_offering | Success | 0.085
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.167
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 63.994
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | Success | 329.454
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.438
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 115.906
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 15.214
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.376
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.201
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.117

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1600: Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Storage

2016-10-03 Thread mike-tutkowski

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
  
@syed Thanks! I had a similar issue with #1642 and fixed it the same way.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

2016-10-03 Thread mike-tutkowski

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@jburwell Excellent...closing and re-opening the ticket fixed the CI issue.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
Trillian test result (tid-98)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 30313 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1692-t98-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 41 look ok, 7 have errors


Test | Result | Time (s)
--- | --- | ---
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 674.889
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 449.734
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 673.393
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 538.579
test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false | `Failure` | 
383.715
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 372.002
test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true | `Failure` | 
381.385
test_08_migrate_vm | `Error` | 56.056
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 412.314
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 321.618
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Error` | 474.586
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 422.538
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | `Error` | 121.438
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 648.885
test_router_dhcphosts | Success | 154.610
test_releaseIP | Success | 269.285
test_reboot_router | Success | 556.647
test_public_ip_user_account | Success | 10.301
test_public_ip_admin_account | Success | 40.349
test_nic_secondaryip_add_remove | Success | 239.169
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_3_Load_Balancer_Rule | Success | 
67.627
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_2_nat_rule | Success | 61.760
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_1_static_nat_rule | Success | 124.902
test_network_acl | Success | 182.207
test_isolate_network_password_server | Success | 59.526
test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan | Success | 10.613
test_deployvm_userdispersing | Success | 126.629
test_deployvm_userdata_post | Success | 25.504
test_deployvm_userdata | Success | 146.459
test_deployvm_userconcentrated | Success | 56.277
test_deployvm_firstfit | Success | 171.742
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 198.708
test_deploy_vm_from_iso | Success | 393.624
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.029
test_delete_account | Success | 243.911
test_dedicatePublicIpRange | Success | 0.424
test_dedicateGuestVlanRange | Success | 10.292
test_create_pvlan_network | Success | 5.204
test_createRegion | Success | 0.092
test_createPortablePublicIPRange | Success | 10.283
test_createPortablePublicIPAcquire | Success | 15.530
test_assign_and_removal_lb | Success | 133.543
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.023
test_UpdateStorageOverProvisioningFactor | Success | 0.203
test_UpdateConfigParamWithScope | Success | 0.144
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup_in_project | Success | 267.698
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup | Success | 197.439
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 226.983
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 242.181
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 71.816
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 156.155
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.231
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 264.169
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 30.919
test_08_start_router | Success | 110.831
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 157.200
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.030
test_07_stop_router | Success | 25.508
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.101
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.606
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.032
test_07_list_default_iso | Success | 0.063
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 177.301
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.099
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 55.748
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.240
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.057
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 179.679
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 608.510
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.084
test_05_iso_permissions | Success | 0.064
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 105.314
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.923
test_04_extract_template | Success | 15.228
test_04_extract_Iso | Success | 5.181
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.438
test_04_create_fat_type_disk_offering | Success | 0.061
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.890
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 97.482
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 4.355
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 176.610
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.186
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.364
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.162
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.139

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
I am LGTM on this now. Thanks @NuxRo @PaulAngus @rhtyd for fixing maccinina 
template. VPN_VPC and INTERNAL_LB test work for Vmware


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: macchinina OVA template

2016-10-03 Thread Sergey Levitskiy

I confirm. All good on vmware side. VPN_VPC that was failing before now 
succeeds.

Test Site 2 Site VPN Across redundant VPCs ... === TestName: 
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Remote Access VPN in VPC ... === TestName: test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Site 2 Site VPN Across VPCs ... === TestName: test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 3 tests in 1377.224s

OK




On 10/3/16, 12:06 PM, "Paul Angus"  wrote:

Awesome! thanks



Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] 
Sent: 03 October 2016 20:06
To: Paul Angus 
Cc: dev 
Subject: Re: macchinina OVA template

Sure, done

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Angus" 
> To: "dev" , "Nux!" 
> Sent: Monday, 3 October, 2016 19:58:52
> Subject: macchinina OVA template

> Hi Nux,
> 
> Could you move the new vmware macchinina template into the main 
> download directory (http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/) 
> so that tests will run please.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul Angus
> 
> 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1600: Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Storage

2016-10-03 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
  
@mike-tutkowski @jburwell looks like we are green now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

2016-10-03 Thread mike-tutkowski

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Closing and re-opening the PR fixed the Travis issue.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

RE: macchinina OVA template

2016-10-03 Thread Paul Angus

Awesome! thanks



Kind regards,

Paul Angus

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] 
Sent: 03 October 2016 20:06
To: Paul Angus 
Cc: dev 
Subject: Re: macchinina OVA template

Sure, done

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Angus" 
> To: "dev" , "Nux!" 
> Sent: Monday, 3 October, 2016 19:58:52
> Subject: macchinina OVA template

> Hi Nux,
> 
> Could you move the new vmware macchinina template into the main 
> download directory (http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/) 
> so that tests will run please.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul Angus
> 
> 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue

Re: macchinina OVA template

2016-10-03 Thread Nux!

Sure, done

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Angus" 
> To: "dev" , "Nux!" 
> Sent: Monday, 3 October, 2016 19:58:52
> Subject: macchinina OVA template

> Hi Nux,
> 
> Could you move the new vmware macchinina template into the main download
> directory (http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/) so that tests
> will run please.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul Angus
> 
> 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

2016-10-03 Thread mike-tutkowski

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
I still got a weird Travis failure, so I decided to close and re-open this 
PR.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

macchinina OVA template

2016-10-03 Thread Paul Angus

Hi Nux,

Could you move the new vmware macchinina template into the main download 
directory (http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/) so that tests 
will run please.




Kind regards,

Paul Angus


paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storag...

2016-10-03 Thread mike-tutkowski

Github user mike-tutkowski closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storag...

2016-10-03 Thread mike-tutkowski

GitHub user mike-tutkowski reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642

CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

This PR makes it easier to spin up system VMs on managed storage.

Managed storage is when you have a dedicated volume on a SAN for a 
particular virtual disk (making it easier to deliver QoS).

For example, with this PR, you'd likely have a single virtual disk for a 
system VM. On XenServer, that virtual disk resides by itself in a storage 
repository (no other virtual disks share this storage repository).

It was possible in the past to spin up system VMs that used managed 
storage, but this PR facilitates the use case by making changes to the System 
Service Offering dialog (and by putting in some parameter checks in the 
management server).

JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9504

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/mike-tutkowski/cloudstack managed_system_vms

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1642






---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

IPv6 in Basic Networking progress

2016-10-03 Thread Wido den Hollander

Hi,

One of the things I'm really missing in CloudStack currently is IPv6 support in 
Basic Networking. Why? Our cloud at PCextreme runs on CloudStack with Basic 
Networking and we currently do have IPv6 support, but without the knowledge of 
CloudStack.

My goals are currently simple:
- The API should return the IPv6 address of the Instance
- Security Grouping should prevent IPv6 address spoofing

This is all on the Wiki: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+in+Basic+Networking

I didn't get to it due to a lack of time, but I gave it a try again this 
weekend and today. With result!: 
https://github.com/wido/cloudstack/commits/ipv6-basic-networking

The 'nics' table already has the ip6_address column and the API will return 
this value when it is set. So what I did is modify the 
DirectPodBasedNetworkGuru that it calculates the EUI-64 IPv6 address a Instance 
will obtain using SLAAC.

In the network you have to make sure the routers (not the VR, physical ones!) 
are sending our Router Advertisements with the same subnet as you configured in 
CloudStack.

The code is actually very simple and it 'works': 
https://widodh.o.auroraobjects.eu/cloudstack/ipv6-basic-networking-instance.png

The CloudStack code is very, very IPv4 orientated and has many flaws. It passes 
IP-Addresses as Strings and such while native types like InetAddress might be 
better, but that would be a major refactor which will consume a lot of time. 
And honestly, I don't have the time.

As stated above our goals are currently simple. The API should return a IPv6 
Address so that after deployment anything consuming the API can instantly 
connect to the Instance over IPv6.

Wido

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1696: [4.9/lts] CLOUDSTACK-9364: Add Ubuntu 16.04 as a gue...

2016-10-03 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
  
@rhtyd @jburwell Actually ESX 6 mapping are here schema-461to470.sql 

INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`hypervisor_capabilities` values 
(25,UUID(),'VMware','6.0',128,0,13,32,1,1);
INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
SELECT UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', guest_os_name, guest_os_id, utc_timestamp(), 0  
FROM `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` WHERE hypervisor_type='VMware' AND 
hypervisor_version='5.5' AND (guest_os_id NOT IN 
(1,2,3,4,62,63,64,65,156,157,221,222) AND guest_os_id NOT BETWEEN 121 AND 130);



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1699: CLOUDSTACK-9513 Migrate transifex workflow and forma...

2016-10-03 Thread jburwell

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1699
  
I will add this PR to the list to merge post resolution of #1692 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1699: CLOUDSTACK-9513 Migrate transifex workflow and forma...

2016-10-03 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1699
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1699: CLOUDSTACK-9513 Migrate transifex workflow and forma...

2016-10-03 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1699
  
Sweet! Thanks @milamberspace I was going to send this in few days, but you 
beat me to it :)
I'll review this tomorrow and get back to you.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

2016-10-03 Thread mike-tutkowski

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Travis, which was failing for a similar reason for #1600, passed, so I will 
(once again) change the commit SHA and re-push. In fact, while I'm at it, I'll 
rebase it against the latest from master before re-pushing.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1542: CLOUDSTACK-9379: Support nested virtualization at VM...

2016-10-03 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
  
Thanks for testing @nvazquez I think since @NuxRo built new vmware 
templates, we can consume macchinina/vmware: 
http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/testing

The TinyCore based template I had created lacks 'ip/iproute' package and 
httpd, I'll try to fix it though as this point since Lucian has already fixed 
macchinina it might be not necessary.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

2016-10-03 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@jburwell @mike-tutkowski  looks like marvin fails to get installed 
properly, one of the dependency fails with following:

Command "/opt/python/2.7.10/bin/python2.7 -u -c "import setuptools, 
tokenize;__file__='/tmp/pip-build-wNNQnH/cryptography/setup.py';exec(compile(getattr(tokenize,
 'open', open)(__file__).read().replace('\r\n', '\n'), __file__, 'exec'))" 
install --record /tmp/pip-ELOxnP-record/install-record.txt 
--single-version-externally-managed --compile --user --prefix=" failed with 
error code 1 in /tmp/pip-build-wNNQnH/cryptography/

Feel free to try to fix it, else I'll open a new PR and see if it works 
with latest 4.9 and master branches, and fix anything necessary tomorrow. I'll 
keep you posted.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1696: [4.9/lts] CLOUDSTACK-9364: Add Ubuntu 16.04 as a gue...

2016-10-03 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
  
@jburwell rollback is not necessary. We've no guest os mappings for VMware 
6.0, those need to be added. If needed, I can send a new PR. /cc @serg38 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Static and DHCP

2016-10-03 Thread Marty Godsey

Quick question. If DHCP is enabled on a network, and I statically assign an IP, 
does the VR do a scan periodically to exclude static address since there is not 
a way, that I know of, to modify the DHCP scope.

Regards,
Marty Godsey

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1696: [4.9/lts] CLOUDSTACK-9364: Add Ubuntu 16.04 as a gue...

2016-10-03 Thread jburwell

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
  
@serg38 good catch regarding vSphere 6.  As I noted earlier, I will be 
rolling back this merge, and we will address it on re-submission.

Once we resolve the VMware 5.5, XenServer 6.5, and KVM smoke test issues in 
#1692, we plan to execute the vSphere6 certification tests for 4.9.1.0 and 
4.10.0.0.  In anticipation of this testing, vSphere 6 support has already been 
added to Trillian and blueorangutan.  It hasn't been added to the default 
matrix in order to avoid any additional variables stabilizing the smoke test 
suite.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1698: CLOUDSTACK-9525 add support for windows 10 guest os ...

2016-10-03 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1698
  
@karuturi Can we add mappings for Windows 10 for Vmware hypervisors as well?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1696: [4.9/lts] CLOUDSTACK-9364: Add Ubuntu 16.04 as a gue...

2016-10-03 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
  
@jburwell @rhtyd I apologies. The issue in our environment was due to using 
ESX v6. Once I added new mapping for it Vmware properly assigned Os type. It 
would be nice to officially certify ESX6 for ACS. It has been a supported 
platform for one of the commercial distribution for some time already.

INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'ubuntuGuest', 255, utc_timestamp(), 0);
INSERT IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`guest_os_hypervisor` (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'ubuntu64Guest', 256, utc_timestamp(), 0); 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1696: [4.9/lts] CLOUDSTACK-9364: Add Ubuntu 16.04 as a gue...

2016-10-03 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
  
@jburwell @rhtyd Sorry for a flood of messages. I checked and we do have 
mapping for all OS for Vmware 6 in ACS. It was introduced in 4.7 so that means 
this PR needs to have those 2 lines added (or a new PR created for this)
INSERT IGNORE INTO cloud.guest_os_hypervisor (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'ubuntuGuest', 255, utc_timestamp(), 0);
INSERT IGNORE INTO cloud.guest_os_hypervisor (uuid,hypervisor_type, 
hypervisor_version, guest_os_name, guest_os_id, created, is_user_defined) 
VALUES (UUID(),'VMware', '6.0', 'ubuntu64Guest', 256, utc_timestamp(), 0);


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
Trillian test result (tid-96)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 12351 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1692-t96-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Test completed. 22 look ok, 26 have errors


Test | Result | Time (s)
--- | --- | ---
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 375.113
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 204.070
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 204.037
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Failure` | 10.389
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | `Failure` | 5.204
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Failure` | 10.508
test_releaseIP | `Error` | 127.726
test_reboot_router | `Error` | 127.721
test_nic_secondaryip_add_remove | `Error` | 127.739
test_network_acl | `Error` | 121.544
test_deployvm_userdispersing | `Error` | 30.473
test_deployvm_userdata_post | `Error` | 30.565
test_deployvm_userdata | `Error` | 126.759
test_deployvm_userconcentrated | `Error` | 30.468
test_deployvm_firstfit | `Error` | 116.225
test_delete_account | `Error` | 127.768
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup_in_project | `Error` | 126.384
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup | `Error` | 111.126
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Error` | 11.920
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Error` | 385.340
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Error` | 11.910
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Error` | 214.287
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Error` | 12.112
test_03_RVR_Network_check_router_state | `Error` | 0.293
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Error` | 214.273
test_02_routervm_iptables_policies | `Error` | 126.061
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Error` | 11.965
test_02_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_false | `Error` | 
111.119
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Error` | 11.909
test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false | `Error` | 
241.136
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | `Error` | 5.322
test_01_single_VPC_iptables_policies | `Error` | 152.069
test_01_single_VPC_iptables_policies | `Error` | 131.683
test_01_nic | `Error` | 118.061
test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_true | `Error` | 116.090
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Error` | 11.963
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Error` | 17.013
test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true | `Error` | 241.746
ContextSuite context=TestVolumes>:setup | `Error` | 0.000
ContextSuite context=TestVmSnapshot>:setup | `Error` | 17.454
ContextSuite context=TestVMLifeCycle>:setup | `Error` | 0.000
ContextSuite context=TestTemplates>:setup | `Error` | 0.000
ContextSuite context=TestSnapshotRootDisk>:setup | `Error` | 0.000
ContextSuite context=TestServiceOfferings>:setup | `Error` | 7.171
ContextSuite context=TestScaleVm>:setup | `Error` | 0.000
ContextSuite context=TestRouterServices>:setup | `Error` | 0.000
ContextSuite context=TestRouterRules>:setup | `Error` | 240.410
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:setup | `Error` | 0.000
ContextSuite context=TestResetVmOnReboot>:setup | `Error` | 0.000
ContextSuite context=TestPortForwarding>:setup | `Error` | 255.502
ContextSuite context=TestLoadBalance>:setup | `Error` | 0.000
ContextSuite context=TestIsolatedNetworksPasswdServer>:setup | `Error` | 
0.000
ContextSuite context=TestDeployVM>:setup | `Error` | 0.000
ContextSuite context=TestCreateVolume>:setup | `Error` | 0.000
test_public_ip_user_account | Success | 10.277
test_public_ip_admin_account | Success | 40.384
test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan | Success | 15.334
test_deploy_vm_from_iso | Success | 323.758
test_dedicatePublicIpRange | Success | 0.526
test_dedicateGuestVlanRange | Success | 10.299
test_create_pvlan_network | Success | 5.235
test_createRegion | Success | 0.041
test_createPortablePublicIPRange | Success | 15.217
test_createPortablePublicIPAcquire | Success | 15.487
test_UpdateStorageOverProvisioningFactor | Success | 0.156
test_UpdateConfigParamWithScope | Success | 0.214
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 196.487
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 198.897
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 111.557
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 148.835
test_07_list_default_iso | Success | 0.052
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 136.587
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 168.845
test_05_iso_permissions | Success | 0.063
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | Success | 455.064
test_04_extract_Iso | Success | 5.175
test_04_create_fat_type_disk_offering | Success | 0.075
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success |

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
Trillian test result (tid-91)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking
Total time taken: 22521 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1692-t91-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 48 look ok, 1 have errors


Test | Result | Time (s)
--- | --- | ---
test_router_dhcphosts | Success | 277.260
test_releaseIP | Success | 253.181
test_reboot_router | Success | 409.184
test_public_ip_user_account | Success | 10.203
test_public_ip_admin_account | Success | 40.377
test_nic_secondaryip_add_remove | Success | 197.692
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_3_Load_Balancer_Rule | Success | 
66.760
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_2_nat_rule | Success | 61.910
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_1_static_nat_rule | Success | 124.158
test_network_acl | Success | 65.880
test_isolate_network_password_server | Success | 89.796
test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan | Success | 15.229
test_deployvm_userdispersing | Success | 20.533
test_deployvm_userdata_post | Success | 10.490
test_deployvm_userdata | Success | 50.956
test_deployvm_userconcentrated | Success | 20.463
test_deployvm_firstfit | Success | 60.846
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 248.035
test_deploy_vm_from_iso | Success | 433.027
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.020
test_delete_account | Success | 267.940
test_dedicatePublicIpRange | Success | 0.294
test_dedicateGuestVlanRange | Success | 10.375
test_create_pvlan_network | Success | 5.154
test_createRegion | Success | 0.033
test_createPortablePublicIPRange | Success | 15.210
test_createPortablePublicIPAcquire | Success | 15.446
test_assign_and_removal_lb | Success | 133.908
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.016
test_UpdateStorageOverProvisioningFactor | Success | 0.103
test_UpdateConfigParamWithScope | Success | 0.114
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup_in_project | Success | 126.266
test_DeployVmAntiAffinityGroup | Success | 75.802
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 35.368
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.551
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 71.540
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.283
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.118
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.940
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.380
test_08_start_router | Success | 30.311
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.280
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.761
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.803
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.033
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.127
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.080
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 15.400
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 103.810
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.038
test_07_list_default_iso | Success | 0.045
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.566
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.040
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.250
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.818
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.115
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 163.679
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 438.274
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.025
test_05_iso_permissions | Success | 0.039
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.183
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | Success | 470.923
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 839.940
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | Success | 267.973
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.718
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.172
test_04_extract_Iso | Success | 5.348
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.224
test_04_create_fat_type_disk_offering | Success | 0.045
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.296
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 209.687
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | Success | 474.958
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | Success | 194.469
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.400
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 55.553
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.857
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.289
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.076
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.172
test_03_delete_iso | Success | 95.188
test_03_delete_disk_offering | Success | 0.025
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 457.025
test_03_RVR_Network_check_router_state | Success | 283.029
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | Success | 375.241
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.214
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.133
test_02_routervm_iptables_policies | Success | 197.527
test_02_router_internal_adv |

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1542: CLOUDSTACK-9379: Support nested virtualization at VM...

2016-10-03 Thread nvazquez

Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1542
  
Hi @rhtyd, we ran `test_internal_lb.py` and `test_vpc_vpn.py` using 
`tl-vmware.ova` template and got this results:

`test_vpc_vpn` is ok:
```
Test Site 2 Site VPN Across redundant VPCs ... === TestName: 
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Remote Access VPN in VPC ... === TestName: 
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Site 2 Site VPN Across VPCs ... === TestName: 
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
 
--
Ran 3 tests in 1949.605s
 
OK
```

However, `test_internal_lb` fails, we could find some issues:
- /sbin/ip is needed but not present in template {Cmd: /sbin/ip addr show 
eth0 |grep 'inet '| cut -f6 -d' ' > /tmp/index.html via Host: 10.140.12.107} 
{returns: [u'sh: /sbin/ip: not found']}
- 2 more tests fail due to a difference in wget on new template: {Cmd: 
/usr/bin/wget -T3 -qO- --user=XX --password=XX http://:8081/admin?stats via 
Host: 10.140.12.106} {returns: [u"/usr/bin/wget: unrecognized option '..
- We have some strange erros in this functions which require more arguments 
than given but couldn't find out why
```
2016-10-02 22:13:20,881 - CRITICAL - EXCEPTION: 
execute_internallb_haproxy_tests: ['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', '  
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 331, in run\n
testMethod()\n', 'TypeError: execute_internallb_haproxy_tests() takes exactly 2 
arguments (1 given)\n']
2016-10-02 22:13:20,883 - CRITICAL - EXCEPTION: 
execute_internallb_roundrobin_tests: ['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', ' 
 File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 331, in run\n
testMethod()\n', 'TypeError: execute_internallb_roundrobin_tests() takes 
exactly 2 arguments (1 given)\n']
2016-10-02 22:13:20,885 - CRITICAL - EXCEPTION: run_ssh_test_accross_hosts: 
['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', '  File 
"/usr/local/lib/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 331, in run\n
testMethod()\n', 'TypeError: run_ssh_test_accross_hosts() takes at least 3 
arguments (1 given)\n']
```


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1600: Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Storage

2016-10-03 Thread syed

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
  
@mike-tutkowski @jburwell I've re-opened the PR to trigger jenkins again. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1600: Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Stora...

2016-10-03 Thread syed

GitHub user syed reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600

Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Storage

This PR adds an ability to Pass a new parameter, locationType,
to the âcreateSnapshotâ API command. Depending on the locationType,
we decide where the snapshot should go in case of managed storage.

There are two possible values for the locationType param

1) `Primary`: The standard operation for managed storage is to
keep the snapshot on the device (primary). For non-managed storage, 
this will
give an error as this option is only supported for managed storage

2) `Secondary`: Applicable only to managed storage. This will
keep the snapshot on the secondary storage. For non-managed
storage, this will result in an error.

The reason for implementing this feature is to avoid a single
point of failure for primary storage. Right now in case of managed
storage, if the primary storage goes down, there is no easy way
to recover data as all snapshots are also stored on the primary.
This features allows us to mitigate that risk.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/syed/cloudstack snapshot-archive-pr

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1600


commit bfad68efa35b94f67470fd8b549aca0cc7ff7d30
Author: Syed 
Date:   2016-06-30T17:37:33Z

Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Storage

This PR adds an ability to Pass a new parameter, locationType,
to the âcreateSnapshotâ API command. Depending on the locationType,
we decide where the snapshot should go in case of managed storage.

There are two possible values for the locationType param

1) `Standard`: The standard operation for managed storage is to
keep the snapshot on the device. For non-managed storage, this will
be to upload it to secondary storage. This option will be the
default.

2) `Archive`: Applicable only to managed storage. This will
keep the snapshot on the secondary storage. For non-managed
storage, this will result in an error.

The reason for implementing this feature is to avoid a single
point of failure for primary storage. Right now in case of managed
storage, if the primary storage goes down, there is no easy way
to recover data as all snapshots are also stored on the primary.
This features allows us to mitigate that risk.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1600: Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Stora...

2016-10-03 Thread syed

Github user syed closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1696: [4.9/lts] CLOUDSTACK-9364: Add Ubuntu 16.04 as a gue...

2016-10-03 Thread jburwell

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
  
@serg38 @rhtyd I am going to rollback this merge as it appears that the 
patch does not fix the issue.  I would also like to explore @serg38's point 
that we shouldn't need to make code changes to support a new OS.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1696: [4.9/lts] CLOUDSTACK-9364: Add Ubuntu 16.04 as a gue...

2016-10-03 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1696
  
@rhtyd @jburwell @karuturi I confirm the same issue with this PR as with 
'CLOUDSTACK-5922:Incorrect handling RHEL guests for 5.5 to 5.9
When Os type is specified as Ubuntu 16.04

![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/16176702/19040896/dae77882-893a-11e6-8274-57b87d85d55b.png)
and VM is started on VmWare it actually creates VM with OS type 'Other 
(64-bit)'


![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/16176702/19040860/abbacb18-893a-11e6-9349-bc0d9d781671.png)

The fix was to put a respective entry into 
vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/util/VmwareGuestOsMapper.java


https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/05c6b455ae89480d84ba5dfa4dc79d3336ebd458

Can we roll back this PR and make it right? An alternative path wold be to 
figure out why adding entries into tables is not good enough and why changes in 
the code is still required.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1698: CLOUDSTACK-9525 add support for windows 10 guest os ...

2016-10-03 Thread serg38

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1698
  
@karuturi  @rhtyd  I might be mistaken but we also need to add mapping into

cloudstack/vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/util/VmwareGuestOsMapper 
and/or

plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/KVMGuestOsMapper

In the past if not added on vmware it would create VM with 'Other-64 
bit' OS type instead e.g. this Jira ticket
'CLOUDSTACK-5922:Incorrect handling RHEL guests for 5.5 to 5.9'

The same concern is for recently merged PR1696. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1699: CLOUDSTACK-9513 Migrate transifex workflow an...

2016-10-03 Thread milamberspace

GitHub user milamberspace opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1699

CLOUDSTACK-9513 Migrate transifex workflow and format to json

Move the localization resource files from Java Properties format to JSON 
Key-Value format
Change the Transifex sync script to handle JSON resource files instead of 
Properties files
Update the README
Remove old version from the Transifex configuration file
Remove unused gen-l10n.py script and update the ui/pom.xml to remove the 
execution of this script


cc @rhtyd @jburwell 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/milamberspace/cloudstack 
L10N_MigrateToJSONkeyValue

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1699.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1699


commit f8bb65a81546cd47561b717d84c686738b8c6fbc
Author: Milamber 
Date:   2016-10-03T13:17:50Z

CLOUDSTACK-9513 Migrate transifex workflow and format to json

Move the localization resource files from Java Properties format to JSON 
Key-Value format
Change the Transifex sync script to handle JSON resource files instead of 
Properties files
Update the README
Remove old version from the Transifex configuration file
Remove unused gen-l10n.py script and update the ui/pom.xml to remove the 
execution of this script




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread NuxRo

Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
Sure, though I may not have the time to do it today, but soon.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

2016-10-03 Thread jburwell

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@rhtyd any ideas?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

2016-10-03 Thread mike-tutkowski

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@jburwell I think it's Travis. I've changed the commit SHA twice now and it 
failed both times plus it fails with #1600, as well (even though I pushed that 
one multiple times, too). Not sure why it can't find nosetests.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

2016-10-03 Thread jburwell

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
@mike-tutkowski The Travis build is failing with the following error:

```
0.04s$ ./tools/travis/script.sh ${TESTS}
Running tests:  smoke/test_usage_events smoke/test_vm_life_cycle 
smoke/test_vm_snapshots smoke/test_volumes smoke/test_vpc_redundant 
smoke/test_vpc_router_nics smoke/test_vpc_vpn smoke/misc/test_deploy_vm 
smoke/misc/test_vm_ha smoke/misc/test_escalations_templates 
smoke/misc/test_vm_sync
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
./tools/travis/script.sh: line 44: nosetests: command not found
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./tools/travis/xunit-reader.py", line 27, in 
import texttable
ImportError: No module named texttable
```

I don't know if that is due to a change in the PR or Travis just need to be 
re-kicked.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: CLOUDSTACK-9504: System VMs on Managed Storage

2016-10-03 Thread mike-tutkowski

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642
  
Travis issue?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
@NuxRo Thanks, I'll test and confirm for xen and kvm in few hours. Can you 
also update the repo on how anyone can build the templates from source? 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread PaulAngus

Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
VMWare LGTM



Kind regards,

Paul Angus



VP Technology
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
 
 

From: NuxRo [mailto:notificati...@github.com]
Sent: 03 October 2016 14:11
To: apache/cloudstack 
Cc: Paul Angus ; Mention 

Subject: Re: [apache/cloudstack] Fix Smoke Test Failures (#1692)


Can you guys let me know if this runs OK on all your HVs? I've rebuilt the 
kernel

http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/testing/

â
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on 
GitHub, 
or mute the 
thread.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread NuxRo

Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
Can you guys let me know if this runs OK on all your HVs? I've rebuilt the 
kernel

http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/testing/


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-46


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1673: CLOUDSTACK-9071: Properly parse stats.output.uri in ...

2016-10-03 Thread wido

Github user wido commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1673
  
@jburwell You need to configure the management server with Graphite enabled 
with a wrongly entered URI to trigger this bug.

This is a manual error when somebody gives in a wrongly formed URL. The 
Graphite output was not broken by default.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
Based on today's test runs and fixes, most tests run fine on kvm. At the 
moment, several fixes were done to several tests to ensure they run on vmware 
and xenserver as well. I've kicked a new pkg job, the result of which we should 
get in next 8 hours.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1698: CLOUDSTACK-9525 add support for windows 10

2016-10-03 Thread karuturi

GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1698

CLOUDSTACK-9525 add support for windows 10 

added guest_os and guest_os_hypervisor mappings for windows10 and xenserver 
6.5.0

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/karuturi/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9525

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1698.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1698


commit d2e151dada803c12883a01cd8225f6c2a74ffa94
Author: Rajani Karuturi 
Date:   2016-10-03T10:29:00Z

CLOUDSTACK-9525 add support for windows 10 guest os in xenserver 6.5.0




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-45


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread blueorangutan

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-44


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
I've tested my TinyLinux templates against vmware, xenserver and kvm and 
they are working alright. On VMware, the networking worked with the loaded 
e1000/e1000e kernel module.

Wrt failure, an issue was found with env where common.py from Marvin failed 
to patch correctly causing some test failures. Re-ran the tests manually to get 
them working:

Env: pr1692-t88-kvm-centos7-marvin

Test | Result | Time (s)
--- | --- | ---
test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan | Success | 15.418
test_dedicateGuestVlanRange | Success | 10.271



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1692: Fix Smoke Test Failures

2016-10-03 Thread rhtyd

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1692
  
Thanks @NuxRo 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

64 matches

Mail list logo