Re: Question about JavaScript validators in UI

[Marc-Aurèle Brothier]

>From a quick look at the code you've forgotten one "|" for the or condition:

$.validator.addMethod("ipv46cidr", function(value, element) {
if (!$.validator.methods.ipv4cidr.call(this, value, element) ||
!$.validator.methods.ipv6cidr.call(this, value, element))
return false;

return true;
}, "The specified IPv4/IPv6 CIDR is invalid.");

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Wido den Hollander  wrote:

> So my JS skills are way to low, but I tried this, but it doesn't seem to
> work:
>
> $.validator.addMethod("ipv46cidr", function(value, element) {
> if (!$.validator.methods.ipv4cidr.call(this, value, element) |
> !$.validator.methods.ipv6cidr.call(this, value, element))
> return false;
>
> return true;
> }, "The specified IPv4/IPv6 CIDR is invalid.");
>
> What am I missing here?
>
> Wido
>
> > Op 23 oktober 2016 om 9:37 schreef Rohit Yadav <
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>:
> >
> >
> > Hi Wido,
> >
> >
> > Yes, you can add a new validator that can validator that the provided
> address is either ipv4 or ipv6, here:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/ui/
> scripts/sharedFunctions.js#L2327
> >
> >
> > Give the validator any appropriate name, and use it in the network.js
> code replacing the currently defined validator with yours.
> >
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > 
> > From: Wido den Hollander 
> > Sent: 21 October 2016 17:33:29
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Question about JavaScript validators in UI
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > While working on the IPv6 for Basic Networking I'm at the stage of the
> Security Groups.
> >
> > When entering a CIDR in the UI which is not IPv4 (eg ::/0) it will show:
> 'The specified IPv4 CIDR is invalid.'
> >
> > That's true, so looking in network.js I see this piece of code:
> >
> > 'cidr': {
> >   edit: true,
> >   label: 'label.cidr',
> >   isHidden: true,
> >   validation: {
> > ipv4cidr: true
> >   }
> >  },
> >
> > There is a ipv6cidr validation method as well. How can I modify the
> JavaScript in such a way that either a valid IPv4 OR IPv6 CIDR has to be
> entered?
> >
> > My JavaScript skills are rather low.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Wido
> >
> > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
reran the test for delete account and it passes.
`Test for delete account ... === TestName: test_delete_account | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok`
merging this PR now


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1737: CLOUDSTACK-9561 Unable to delete domain/Accou...

[SudharmaJain]

GitHub user SudharmaJain opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1737

CLOUDSTACK-9561 Unable to delete domain/Account

While deleting the UserAccount Cleanup for the removed VMs/volumes are not 
happening. For the removed VMs, snapshots doesn't get cleaned. Only for running 
VMs the cleanup happens. 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/SudharmaJain/cloudstack cs-9561

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1737.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1737


commit 2c443cd189664ec35aaeedd7bd447d4fcfce0387
Author: Sudharma Jain 
Date:   2016-10-27T05:28:37Z

CLOUDSTACK-9561 Unable to delete domain/Account




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1736: CLOUDSTACK-9562 Linux Guest VM get wrong defa...

[SudharmaJain]

GitHub user SudharmaJain opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1736

CLOUDSTACK-9562 Linux Guest VM get wrong default route when there are…

… multiple Nic

REPRO STEPS
==
1. Log as admin, create a VM CentOSx64 integrate with default network 
"Admin-Network" (gateway is 10.1.1.1)
2. Create a VPC "TestVpc" and inside network named "TechNet" (gateway is 
10.0.0.1)
3. Add VPC network to VM as NIC 2
4. Reboot VM and examine VM default VR changed to VPC default gateway

dhcp options entries getting updated on the VR properly, but still they are 
not taking effect. Once we restart the dnsmasq service the issue is resolved. 
This is because dhcp-opsfile entry to dnsmasq.conf was made after service start 
and sending SIGHUP does not reload dnsmasq configuration. Thus adding 
dhcp-opsfile entry to vpcdnsmasq.conf helped to fix the issue. 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/SudharmaJain/cloudstack cs-9562

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1736.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1736


commit d9b701fbee7e11198ce23c8166a985db0da3ec00
Author: Sudharma Jain 
Date:   2016-10-27T05:05:38Z

CLOUDSTACK-9562 Linux Guest VM get wrong default route when there are 
multiple Nic




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1718: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.9.1.0

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1718
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✖centos7 ✖debian. JID-104


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1719: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.10.0.0

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1719
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✖centos7 ✖debian. JID-105


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1717: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.8.2.1

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1717
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✖centos7 ✔debian. JID-103


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[cloudmonger]

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 125
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=102
 Failed=3
 Skipped=6

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_network.py

 * test_delete_account Failed

* test_deploy_vm_iso.py

 * test_deploy_vm_from_iso Failing since 10 runs

* test_vm_life_cycle.py

 * test_10_attachAndDetach_iso Failing since 11 runs


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_router_dns.py
test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_routers_network_ops.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1719: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.10.0.0

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1719
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt 
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1717: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.8.2.1

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1717
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt 
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1718: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.9.1.0

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1718
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt 
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1717: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.8.2.1

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1717
  
@blueorangutan test matrix


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1718: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.9.1.0

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1718
  
@blueorangutan test matrix


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1719: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.10.0.0

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1719
  
@blueorangutan test matrix


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack Security Releases 4.8.1.1, 4.9.0.1

[Rohit Yadav]

# Apache CloudStack Security Releases 4.8.1.1, 4.9.0.1

The Apache CloudStack project announces security releases 4.8.1.1, 4.9.0.1
that fixes the bug causing vulnerability over previously released minor
versions 4.8.1 and 4.9.0 respectively. As a security release, no new
features are included but only includes the fix for CVE-2016-6813.

Apache CloudStack is an integrated Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
software platform that allows users to build feature-rich public and
private cloud environments. CloudStack includes an intuitive user interface
and rich API for managing the compute, networking, software, and storage
resources. The project became an Apache top level project in March 2013.

More information about Apache CloudStack can be found at:

http://cloudstack.apache.org/

## Upgrade Notes

Affected users are only required to upgrade their management server(s) to
suitable security release version. The upgrade does not require any
database or systemvm-template related change.

## Downloads

The official source code release can be downloaded from:

http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html

In addition to the official source code release, individual contributors
have also made convenience binaries available on the Apache CloudStack
download page, and as follows:

http://www.shapeblue.com/packages/
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/ (packages to be published soon)
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/centos/6/ (packages to be published soon)
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/centos/7/ (packages to be published soon)

###

Regards,
Rohit Yadav

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1718: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.9.1.0

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1718
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-101


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1719: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.10.0.0

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1719
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-102


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1717: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.8.2.1

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1717
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-100


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1717: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.8.2.1

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1717
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1717: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.8.2.1

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1717
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1719: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.10.0.0

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1719
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1718: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.9.1.0

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1718
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1718: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.9.1.0

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1718
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1719: [RC][Testing] Dummy PR for kicking tests on 4.10.0.0

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1719
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1729: CLOUDSTACK-9564: Fix memory leaks in VmwareContextPo...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
  
Trillian test result (tid-194)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 35338 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1729-t194-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 45 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 502.33 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 723.91 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | `Error` | 305.63 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | `Error` | 25.31 | test_snapshots.py
ContextSuite context=TestSnapshotRootDisk>:teardown | `Error` | 101.10 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 166.89 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 371.22 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 759.21 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 714.35 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1571.50 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 736.73 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 736.69 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1414.35 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 30.90 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 65.62 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.27 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 20.31 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.36 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 63.84 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 525.26 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.31 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 225.19 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 181.62 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 166.81 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 249.22 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.96 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 185.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 76.40 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 256.88 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 15.24 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.12 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.19 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 125.99 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 237.03 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 239.04 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.80 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 207.08 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 359.50 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.35 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.83 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 97.40 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.14 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.12 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.17 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 135.97 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 120.91 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 20.23 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.05 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.66 | test_routers.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multipl...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
  
Trillian test result (tid-195)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 26462 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1659-t195-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 45 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 864.95 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 345.41 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 270.23 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 259.92 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_nic | `Error` | 465.01 | test_nic.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 165.00 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 66.17 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 241.04 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 275.09 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 528.73 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 519.34 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1398.85 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 544.37 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1298.44 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.46 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.41 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.45 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.47 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.26 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.37 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.39 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.77 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 711.27 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 303.86 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.68 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.18 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.89 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.84 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.88 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.35 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 80.73 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.21 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.12 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 35.39 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.61 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 168.75 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.57 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.60 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.75 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.69 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.22 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.32 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.20 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.58 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.15 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.18 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 40.34 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 30.29 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.18 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

[swill]

Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
  
Tomorrow I will pick a recommended S2S VPN configuration and verify the 
rest of the different possible options with that single configuration to give a 
better global picture of the state of this PR.

Also, the testing of the Remote Access VPN connections on my branch are 
going well as well.  We have found a pretty serious unrelated bug in the IP 
allocation in the VR on VR reboot.  If a PF rule is set on the VR and it is 
reboot, the `eth1` interface gets the PF IP instead of the Source NAT IP, so 
that breaks the Remote Access VPN connection.  We have been troubleshooting it, 
but  the problem has been relatively tricky to track down.  More details on 
that once we root cause the issue.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

[swill]

Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
  
I wrote a small testing setup which allows me to automate the build up and 
tear down different configurations in test environment.

Here are the results so far of my branch (hopefully soon to be merged with 
this PR, or I will open my own PR with it).

I am testing this functionality by creating two VPCs with VMs in them and 
creating a S2S VPN connection between the two VPCs.  Then I SSH into a VM in 
one VPC and I ping the private IP of a VM in the other VPC.  Then I tear it 
down and try a different configuration.  

**Setup**
```
VPC 1  VPC 2   
=  =   
VPN GatewayVPN Gateway 
VPN Customer Gateway   VPN Customer Gateway
VPN Connection<--->VPN Connection
 - Passive = True   - Passive = False
```

**Legend**
`SKIP` => At least one of the VPN Connections did not come up, so no test 
was run.
`OK` => The ping test was successful over the S2S VPN connection.
`FAIL` => The ping test failed over the S2S VPN connection.

The following finished before my VPN connection failed.  From these results 
it is fair to say that the Diffie-Hellman group is required for this S2S VPN 
implementation so far.

**Results**
```

+--+-+-+--+--+
| Status   | IKE | ESP | DPD  | 
Encap|

+==+=+=+==+==+
| SKIP | 3des-md5| 3des-md5| True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| SKIP | 3des-md5| 3des-md5;modp1024   | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| SKIP | 3des-md5| 3des-md5;modp1536   | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| OK   | 3des-md5;modp1024   | 3des-md5| True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| OK   | 3des-md5;modp1024   | 3des-md5;modp1024   | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| OK   | 3des-md5;modp1024   | 3des-md5;modp1536   | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| OK   | 3des-md5;modp1536   | 3des-md5| True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| OK   | 3des-md5;modp1536   | 3des-md5;modp1024   | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| OK   | 3des-md5;modp1536   | 3des-md5;modp1536   | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| SKIP | 3des-md5| 3des-sha1   | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| SKIP | 3des-md5| 3des-sha1;modp1024  | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| SKIP | 3des-md5| 3des-sha1;modp1536  | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| OK   | 3des-md5;modp1024   | 3des-sha1   | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| OK   | 3des-md5;modp1024   | 3des-sha1;modp1024  | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| OK   | 3des-md5;modp1024   | 3des-sha1;modp1536  | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| OK   | 3des-md5;modp1536   | 3des-sha1   | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| OK   | 3des-md5;modp1536   | 3des-sha1;modp1024  | True | 
False|

+--+-+-+--+--+
| OK   | 3des-md5;modp1536   | 3des-sha1;modp1536  | True | 
False|

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1600: Support Backup of Snapshots for Managed Storage

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1600
  
@karuturi Anything else @syed needs to do for this one? Thanks!


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[cloudmonger]

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 124
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=98
 Failed=4
 Skipped=6

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_non_contigiousvlan.py

 * test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan Failed

* test_deploy_vm_iso.py

 * test_deploy_vm_from_iso Failing since 9 runs

* test_vm_life_cycle.py

 * test_10_attachAndDetach_iso Failing since 10 runs

* test_routers_network_ops.py

 * test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_true Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

[swill]

Github user swill commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
  
@jayapalu I am not sure why, but I can't seem to do a pull request against 
your branch.  Any ideas why?  Maybe you have some specific permissions on your 
repo to stop this?  If you are not sure, I can just create a new PR with the 
combination of your work and my work.  I have most things working now.  I will 
post a status of what is working and what is not working later tonight after my 
tests finish running...


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: Xenserver7 Support

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed +1 -- I would like to see a full component test run for this PR on XS 
7 and smoke tests for XS 6.5.  Also, we might want to consider a PR for 4.9 and 
then another PR for master like we did for the smoke test fixes.  This approach 
allows us to re-run all tests on the forward merge.

I will perform a code review tonight or tomorrow.  Have you reviewed all 
the Marvin component tests that check XS versions to ensure we won't 
incorrectly skip any for XS 7?

@rhtyd @PaulAngus do we have XS 7 support for Blue Orangutan?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: Xenserver7 Support

[syed]

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@jburwell Got it. I want to stabilize the tests and once everything looks 
green here. I will open a PR against 4.9


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multipl...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
  
@murali-reddy a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multipl...

[murali-reddy]

Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multipl...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-99


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: Xenserver7 Support

[jburwell]

Github user jburwell commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed given that XenServer 6.5 doesn't run on newer hardware, XenServer 
users don't have a realistic LTS release.  Therefore, I propose that this PR be 
targeted to the 4.9 branch and forward merged to master.  Therefore, this 
feature would released in 4.9.2.0 and 4.11.0.0.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multipl...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
  
@murali-reddy a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1659: CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multipl...

[murali-reddy]

Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1735: CLOUDSTACK-9570: Bug in listSnapshots for sna...

[nvazquez]

GitHub user nvazquez opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735

CLOUDSTACK-9570: Bug in listSnapshots for snapshots with deleted data stores

## Actual behaviour
If there is snapshot on a data store that is removed, `listSnapshots` still 
tries to enumerate it and gives error (in this example data store 2 has been 
removed):
`client/api?command=listSnapshots=true=true`
```xml

   530
   4250
   Unable to locate datastore with id 2

```

## Reproduce error
This steps can be followed to reproduce issue:
* Take a snapshot of a volume (this creates a references for primary 
storage and secondary storage in snapshot_store_ref table
* Simulate retiring primary data storage where snapshot is cached (in this 
example X is a fake data store and Y is snapshot id):
```
UPDATE `cloud`.`snapshot_store_ref` SET `store_id`='X', `state`="Destroyed" 
WHERE `id`='Y';
```
* List snapshots: 
`client/api?command=listSnapshots=true=true`

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/nvazquez/cloudstack list-snapshots-issue

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1735


commit dd7d85a71d5e9f889974c5ed4d5d14a5e70354a3
Author: nvazquez 
Date:   2016-10-06T18:28:20Z

CLOUDSTACK-9570: Bug in listSnapshots for snapshots with deleted data stores




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1729: CLOUDSTACK-9564: Fix memory leaks in VmwareContextPo...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
  
Trillian test result (tid-188)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 36442 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1729-t188-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 47 look ok, 1 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 491.73 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 772.89 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 166.59 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 379.47 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 822.25 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 687.41 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1588.78 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 758.11 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 750.14 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1385.30 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 25.87 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 55.53 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 105.21 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.26 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.30 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 58.80 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 525.79 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.20 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 227.18 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 186.32 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.68 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 242.78 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.80 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.20 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 96.92 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 25.22 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 286.76 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 15.24 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.10 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.17 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 166.05 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 236.86 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 238.54 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.36 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.43 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 206.71 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 209.25 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.28 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 26.30 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 129.88 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.10 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.15 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 140.83 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 140.92 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 25.21 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.03 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.51 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 140.89 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: Xenserver7 Support

[syed]

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@rhtyd @PaulAngus  I will verify the failed tests (except VPC and private 
gateway) and update this. It would be nice if we can get this into 4.10


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: Xenserver7 Support

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Trillian test result (tid-192)
Environment: CUSTOM-XenServer (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 35929 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1711-t192-CUSTOM-XenServer.zip
Test completed. 41 look ok, 7 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 573.60 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1362.50 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 570.01 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_extract_template | `Failure` | 5.19 | test_templates.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | `Failure` | 0.04 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | `Failure` | 0.04 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | `Failure` | 0.04 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 525.63 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 454.31 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Error` | 193.73 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | `Error` | 316.04 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | `Error` | 316.09 | test_ssvm.py
ContextSuite context=TestSnapshotRootDisk>:teardown | `Error` | 57.12 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_primary_storage_iscsi | `Error` | 35.60 | test_primary_storage.py
test_reboot_router | `Error` | 1663.91 | test_network.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 306.61 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 146.95 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 538.63 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 327.16 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 641.62 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 1053.97 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.82 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 101.28 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 101.22 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 25.45 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 105.32 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.32 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.57 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 15.84 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 392.78 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.29 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 181.47 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 101.21 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 304.45 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.92 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 185.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 71.38 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.20 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 10.20 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.28 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 30.33 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 141.27 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.14 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.19 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 85.83 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 1261.34 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.30 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 5.46 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.18 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.16 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 21.59 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 126.49 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.13 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.20 | test_secondary_storage.py

PR Backlog

[Paul Angus]

All,

Now that we're getting some testing momentum going, I was thinking that we need 
a way to categorise and prioritise the PR queue.
There are a limited number of labels available for use to apply to the PRs 
within Github as it is,  but we could go through and highlight bug fixes and 
prioritise them and mark ones with outstanding questions against them...
We also need the PRs rebased as some are pretty old.

Thoughts/flames?


Kind regards,

Paul Angus


paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1729: CLOUDSTACK-9564: Fix memory leaks in VmwareContextPo...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos6 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1729: CLOUDSTACK-9564: Fix memory leaks in VmwareContextPo...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
  
@blueorangutan test centos6 vmware-55u3


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
Trillian test result (tid-193)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 25817 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1615-t193-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 39 look ok, 9 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 130.97 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 248.71 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 85.95 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 137.70 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 72.29 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 87.48 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_vpc_privategw_acl | `Failure` | 37.02 | test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 55.87 | 
test_password_server.py
test_oobm_zchange_password | `Failure` | 20.44 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | `Error` | 0.08 | test_vpc_vpn.py
ContextSuite context=TestRVPCSite2SiteVpn>:teardown | `Error` | 240.88 | 
test_vpc_vpn.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 131.30 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan | `Error` | 0.04 | test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_3_Load_Balancer_Rule | `Error` | 
741.16 | test_network.py
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_2_nat_rule | `Error` | 740.25 | 
test_network.py
test_network_rules_acquired_public_ip_1_static_nat_rule | `Error` | 730.93 
| test_network.py
ContextSuite context=TestDedicateGuestVlanRange>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_guest_vlan_range.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 144.87 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 235.78 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 567.08 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 415.30 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1516.19 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 394.00 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 946.00 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.46 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.40 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.43 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.26 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.22 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.21 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.25 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 43.62 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 621.28 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 254.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 71.79 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 35.89 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.80 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.83 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 5.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 90.70 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.19 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.17 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 55.51 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 131.32 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.19 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.31 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 103.11 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.50 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.21 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 0.97 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 16.17 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
Trillian test result (tid-191)
Environment: vmware-60u2 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 30139 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1615-t191-vmware-60u2.zip
Test completed. 37 look ok, 11 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 348.02 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 556.41 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | `Failure` | 90.29 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 61.07 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 444.70 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 248.37 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 203.34 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_vpc_privategw_acl | `Failure` | 112.56 | test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 60.92 | 
test_password_server.py
test_oobm_zchange_password | `Failure` | 20.58 | test_outofbandmanagement.py
ContextSuite context=TestVpcSite2SiteVpn>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_vpc_vpn.py
ContextSuite context=TestVpcRemoteAccessVpn>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_vpc_vpn.py
ContextSuite context=TestRVPCSite2SiteVpn>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_vpc_vpn.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | `Error` | 50.59 | test_volumes.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | `Error` | 211.64 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | `Error` | 162.17 | test_vm_snapshots.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 81.31 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan | `Error` | 0.04 | test_non_contigiousvlan.py
ContextSuite context=TestInternalLb>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_internal_lb.py
ContextSuite context=TestDedicateGuestVlanRange>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_guest_vlan_range.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 655.31 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 662.42 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1621.01 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 757.69 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1426.91 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 20.83 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.32 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.21 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 53.77 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 515.39 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.14 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 258.62 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 71.98 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 5.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 251.70 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 15.27 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.18 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 120.98 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 231.75 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 264.20 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.65 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.63 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 207.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 244.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.78 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 5.86 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.17 | test_ssvm.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[cloudmonger]

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 123
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=102
 Failed=3
 Skipped=6

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_deploy_vm_iso.py

 * test_deploy_vm_from_iso Failing since 8 runs

* test_vm_life_cycle.py

 * test_10_attachAndDetach_iso Failing since 9 runs

* test_routers_network_ops.py

 * test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1727: CLOUDSTACK-9539: Support changing Service offering f...

[nvazquez]

Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1727
  
@ustcweizhou @koushik-das thanks for your review! I refactored based on 
your comments and tested everything is working as expected.
To test new marvin test introduced in 
`test/integration/smoke/test_vm_snapshots.py` in Vmware, is needed to include 
#1677 changes. Once it gets merged I can rebase 4.9


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1732: Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java

[syed]

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
  
LGTM as well 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Question about JavaScript validators in UI

[Wido den Hollander]

So my JS skills are way to low, but I tried this, but it doesn't seem to work:

$.validator.addMethod("ipv46cidr", function(value, element) {
if (!$.validator.methods.ipv4cidr.call(this, value, element) | 
!$.validator.methods.ipv6cidr.call(this, value, element))
return false;

return true;
}, "The specified IPv4/IPv6 CIDR is invalid.");

What am I missing here?

Wido

> Op 23 oktober 2016 om 9:37 schreef Rohit Yadav :
> 
> 
> Hi Wido,
> 
> 
> Yes, you can add a new validator that can validator that the provided address 
> is either ipv4 or ipv6, here:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/ui/scripts/sharedFunctions.js#L2327
> 
> 
> Give the validator any appropriate name, and use it in the network.js code 
> replacing the currently defined validator with yours.
> 
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 
> From: Wido den Hollander 
> Sent: 21 October 2016 17:33:29
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Question about JavaScript validators in UI
> 
> Hi,
> 
> While working on the IPv6 for Basic Networking I'm at the stage of the 
> Security Groups.
> 
> When entering a CIDR in the UI which is not IPv4 (eg ::/0) it will show: 'The 
> specified IPv4 CIDR is invalid.'
> 
> That's true, so looking in network.js I see this piece of code:
> 
> 'cidr': {
>   edit: true,
>   label: 'label.cidr',
>   isHidden: true,
>   validation: {
> ipv4cidr: true
>   }
>  },
> 
> There is a ipv6cidr validation method as well. How can I modify the 
> JavaScript in such a way that either a valid IPv4 OR IPv6 CIDR has to be 
> entered?
> 
> My JavaScript skills are rather low.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Wido
> 
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
>

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1734: CLOUDSTACK-9567 Difference in the api call ou...

[SudharmaJain]

GitHub user SudharmaJain opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1734

CLOUDSTACK-9567 Difference in the api call outputs for CAPACITY_TYPE_…

…CPU = 1

The total capacity reported listPods and listCapacity is different, ideally 
they have to be same


http://10.223.59.69:8096/client/api?command=listPods=78c23ee6-c585-4065-a03c-08c15492c077=48889c46-dd04-4a50-af06-8aad7ea46f61=true

```

1
1042980
1621776
64.31

```


http://10.223.59.69:8096/client/api?command=listCapacity=78c23ee6-c585-4065-a03c-08c15492c077=48889c46-dd04-4a50-af06-8aad7ea46f61=1

```

1

1
48889c46-dd04-4a50-af06-8aad7ea46f61
jp2-east01
78c23ee6-c585-4065-a03c-08c15492c077
RG1-ck2ejo2-Pod11
1042980
2453456
42.51


```

The problem here was the query being used to fetch data. 

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/SudharmaJain/cloudstack cs-9567

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1734.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1734


commit 4220d20f2d6633649b9b65c92f02b47ea09280c7
Author: Sudharma Jain 
Date:   2016-10-26T12:38:58Z

CLOUDSTACK-9567 Difference in the api call outputs for CAPACITY_TYPE_CPU = 1




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: Xenserver7 Support

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Trillian test result (tid-183)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 32182 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1711-t183-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Test completed. 45 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 551.18 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 1376.94 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 555.07 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 826.22 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 503.72 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 310.37 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
ContextSuite context=TestSnapshotRootDisk>:teardown | `Error` | 57.08 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 311.94 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 167.12 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 569.05 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 306.19 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 715.51 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 892.10 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 1096.37 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.86 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 91.27 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 101.51 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 25.44 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.34 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.29 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.43 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 10.82 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 393.71 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.31 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 191.42 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.79 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 223.69 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.04 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 27.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.32 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 10.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.30 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.37 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 136.22 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.19 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.12 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.22 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 70.70 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 226.76 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 259.27 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 151.70 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 145.24 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 197.08 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 169.60 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.87 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.17 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 16.54 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 126.49 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.09 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.14 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.19 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_scale_vm | Success | 5.26 | test_scale_vm.py

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1726: CLOUDSTACK-9560 Root volume of deleted VM lef...

[ustcweizhou]

Github user ustcweizhou commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726#discussion_r85108024
  
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -2199,15 +2199,20 @@ public void cleanupDownloadUrls(){
 if(downloadUrlCurrentAgeInSecs < 
_downloadUrlExpirationInterval){  // URL hasnt expired yet
 continue;
 }
-
-s_logger.debug("Removing download url " + 
volumeOnImageStore.getExtractUrl() + " for volume id " + 
volumeOnImageStore.getVolumeId());
+long volumeId = volumeOnImageStore.getVolumeId();
+s_logger.debug("Removing download url " + 
volumeOnImageStore.getExtractUrl() + " for volume id " + volumeId);
 
 // Remove it from image store
 ImageStoreEntity secStore = (ImageStoreEntity) 
_dataStoreMgr.getDataStore(volumeOnImageStore.getDataStoreId(), 
DataStoreRole.Image);
 
secStore.deleteExtractUrl(volumeOnImageStore.getInstallPath(), 
volumeOnImageStore.getExtractUrl(), Upload.Type.VOLUME);
 
 // Now expunge it from DB since this entry was created 
only for download purpose
 _volumeStoreDao.expunge(volumeOnImageStore.getId());
+Volume volume = _volumeDao.findById(volumeId);
+if (volume != null && volume.getState() == 
Volume.State.Expunged)
+{
+_volumeDao.remove(volumeId);
+}
--- End diff --

There might be multiple volume snapshot on image store.
We need to make sure that all volume snapshot have been removed from image 
store.

```
+VolumeDataStoreVO volumesOnImageStore = 
_volumeStoreDao.findByVolume(volumeId);
+if (volumesOnImageStore == null) { // volume is expunged 
from primary, as well as on secondary
+VolumeVO vol = _volumeDao.findById(volumeId);
+if (vol != null && (vol.getState() == 
Volume.State.Expunged)) {
+_volumeDao.remove(volumeId);
+}
+}
```


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1733: CLOUDSTACK-9563 ExtractTemplate returns malfo...

[SudharmaJain]

GitHub user SudharmaJain opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1733

CLOUDSTACK-9563 ExtractTemplate returns malformed URL after migrating…

… NFS to s3

While downloading the template for the first time install path was not 
available. During first download after migration template is synced to s3 
storage and template install path is updated to DB. But while generating the 
extract URL we are still taking install path from TemplateDataStoreVO object 
cached in the process.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/SudharmaJain/cloudstack cs-9563

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1733.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1733


commit 9074f37cb8f33171246056aca1ad50f35e65b494
Author: Sudharma Jain 
Date:   2016-10-26T12:03:31Z

CLOUDSTACK-9563 ExtractTemplate returns malformed URL after migrating NFS 
to s3




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: patchviasocket seems to be broken with qemu 2.3(+?)

[Linas Žilinskas]

So after some investigation I've found out that qemu 2.3.0 is indeed 
broken, at least the way CS uses the qemu chardev/socket.


Not sure in which specific version it happened, but it was fixed in 
2.4.0-rc3, specifically noting that CloudStack 4.2 was not working.


qemu git commit: 4bf1cb03fbc43b0055af60d4ff093d6894aa4338

Also attaching the patch from that commit.


For our own purposes i've included the patch to the qemu-kvm-ev package 
(2.3.0) and all is well.



On 2016-10-20 09:59, Linas Žilinskas wrote:


Hi.

We have made an upgrade to 4.9.

Custom build packages with our own patches, which in my mind (i'm the 
only one patching those) should not affect the issue i'll describe.


I'm not sure whether we didn't notice it before, or it's actually 
related to something in 4.9


Basically our system vm's were unable to be patched via the qemu 
socket. The script simply error'ed out with a timeout while trying to 
push the data to the socket.


Executing it manually (with cmd line from the logs) resulted the same. 
I even tried the old perl variant, which also had same result.


So finally we found out that this issue happens only on our HVs which 
run qemu 2.3.0, from the centos 7 special interest virtualization 
repo. Other ones that run qemu 1.5, from official repos, can patch the 
system vms fine.


So i'm wondering if anyone tested 4.9 with kvm with qemu >= 2.x? Maybe 
it something else special in our setup. e.g. we're running the HVs 
from a preconfigured netboot image (pxe), but all of them, including 
those with qemu 1.5, so i have no idea.



Linas Žilinskas
Head of Development
website  facebook 
 twitter 
 linkedin 



Host1Plus is a division of Digital Energy Technologies Ltd.

26 York Street, London W1U 6PZ, United Kingdom



Linas Žilinskas
Head of Development
website  facebook 
 twitter 
 linkedin 



Host1Plus is a division of Digital Energy Technologies Ltd.

26 York Street, London W1U 6PZ, United Kingdom

>From 4bf1cb03fbc43b0055af60d4ff093d6894aa4338 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nils Carlson 
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 20:39:56 +
Subject: [PATCH] qemu-char: Fix missed data on unix socket

Commit 812c1057 introduced HUP detection on unix and tcp sockets prior
to a read in tcp_chr_read. This unfortunately broke CloudStack 4.2
which relied on the old behaviour where data on a socket was readable
even if a HUP was present.

A working solution is to properly check the return values from recv,
handling a closed socket once there is no more data to read.

Also enable polling for G_IO_NVAL to ensure the callback is called
for all possible events as these should now be possible to handle
with the improved error detection.

Signed-off-by: Nils Carlson 
Message-Id: <1437338396-22336-1-git-send-email-pyssl...@ludd.ltu.se>
[Do not handle EINTR; use socket_error(). - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini 
---
 qemu-char.c | 13 +
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/qemu-char.c b/qemu-char.c
index 3200200..d956f8d 100644
--- a/qemu-char.c
+++ b/qemu-char.c
@@ -807,7 +807,8 @@ static gboolean io_watch_poll_prepare(GSource *source, gint *timeout_)
 }
 
 if (now_active) {
-iwp->src = g_io_create_watch(iwp->channel, G_IO_IN | G_IO_ERR | G_IO_HUP);
+iwp->src = g_io_create_watch(iwp->channel,
+ G_IO_IN | G_IO_ERR | G_IO_HUP | G_IO_NVAL);
 g_source_set_callback(iwp->src, iwp->fd_read, iwp->opaque, NULL);
 g_source_attach(iwp->src, NULL);
 } else {
@@ -2856,12 +2857,6 @@ static gboolean tcp_chr_read(GIOChannel *chan, GIOCondition cond, void *opaque)
 uint8_t buf[READ_BUF_LEN];
 int len, size;
 
-if (cond & G_IO_HUP) {
-/* connection closed */
-tcp_chr_disconnect(chr);
-return TRUE;
-}
-
 if (!s->connected || s->max_size <= 0) {
 return TRUE;
 }
@@ -2869,7 +2864,9 @@ static gboolean tcp_chr_read(GIOChannel *chan, GIOCondition cond, void *opaque)
 if (len > s->max_size)
 len = s->max_size;
 size = tcp_chr_recv(chr, (void *)buf, len);
-if (size == 0) {
+if (size == 0 ||
+(size < 0 &&
+ socket_error() != EAGAIN && socket_error() != EWOULDBLOCK)) {
 /* connection closed */
 tcp_chr_disconnect(chr);
 } else if (size > 0) {
-- 
2.9.2

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1729: CLOUDSTACK-9564: Fix memory leaks in VmwareContextPo...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-98


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1586: CLOUDSTACK-9410 Data Disk shown as detached in XS

[cloudmonger]

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1586
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 122
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=101
 Failed=3
 Skipped=5

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_non_contigiousvlan.py

 * test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan Failed

* test_deploy_vm_iso.py

 * test_deploy_vm_from_iso Failing since 7 runs

* test_vm_life_cycle.py

 * test_10_attachAndDetach_iso Failing since 8 runs


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_login.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_ssvm.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
@karuturi a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1615: CLOUDSTACK-9438: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-9252 - Make NFS ...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1650: fix macchinina template specificied for vmwar...

[PaulAngus]

Github user PaulAngus closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1650


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1688: Marvin Tests: Fix VPC network offering select...

[PaulAngus]

Github user PaulAngus closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1688


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1728: CLOUDSTACK-9551: Move java tmp dir to cloudstack-age...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1728
  
LGTM both test results (failures were intermittent issues and can be 
ignored) and code changes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1731: CLOUDSTACK-9565: Fix intermittent failure in ...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1731


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1731: CLOUDSTACK-9565: Fix intermittent failure in test_oo...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1731
  
On basis of Travis result, manual test run and code reviews, I'm going 
ahead and merging this to avoid intermittent failures in upcoming tests.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1731: CLOUDSTACK-9565: Fix intermittent failure in test_oo...

[murali-reddy]

Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1731
  
LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1729: CLOUDSTACK-9564: Fix memory leaks in VmwareContextPo...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-97


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1732: Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job ((this mgmt + is) has been kicked to run 
smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1732: Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
  
@blueorangutan test
(this is to run a regression testing round)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1732: Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-96


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1729: CLOUDSTACK-9564: Fix memory leaks in VmwareContextPo...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1729: CLOUDSTACK-9564: Fix memory leaks in VmwareContextPo...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1604: improvement: systemvm slow operations

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1604
  
@murali-reddy can you help review this one?
@romain-dartigues thanks, can you also squash your commits to a single 
commit, and amend the git commit message to reflect the JIRA ID in the format: 
`CLOUDSTACK-9569: `.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1731: CLOUDSTACK-9565: Fix intermittent failure in test_oo...

[abhinandanprateek]

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1731
  
@LGTM on code review @rhtyd 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1732: Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1732: Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
  
All changes are restricted to the solidfire plugin and currently we don't 
have infra/tests to run them in a general env so considering Mike's tests, LGTM.
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1731: CLOUDSTACK-9565: Fix intermittent failure in test_oo...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1731
  
Test seems to be passing now:

=== TestName: test_oobm_zchange_password | Status : SUCCESS ===



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1731: CLOUDSTACK-9565: Fix intermittent failure in test_oo...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1731
  
Jenkins failure was due to git pull issue, not the PR changes. Pinging for 
quick review/merge -- @abhinandanprateek @murali-reddy @karuturi @koushik-das 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1604: improvement: systemvm slow operations

[romain-dartigues]

Github user romain-dartigues commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1604
  
@rhtyd < JIRA issue 
[#9568](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9568)

I'll rebase as soon as possible.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1732: Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
  
TestVolumes.py (no resigning)

test_00_check_template_cache (TestVolumes.TestVolumes) ... === TestName: 
test_00_check_template_cache | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === 
TestName: test_01_attach_new_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach, detach, and attach volume to a running VM ... === TestName: 
test_02_attach_detach_attach_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach volume to running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_03_attached_volume_reboot_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_04_detach_volume_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a stopped VM, then start. ... === TestName: 
test_05_detach_vol_stopped_VM_start | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === 
TestName: test_06_attach_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Destroy and expunge VM with attached volume ... === TestName: 
test_07_destroy_expunge_VM_with_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete volume that was attached to a VM and is detached now ... === 
TestName: test_08_delete_volume_was_attached | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a data disk to a VM in one account and attach another data disk to a 
VM in another account ... === TestName: 
test_09_attach_volumes_multiple_accounts | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach more than one disk to a VM ... === TestName: 
test_10_attach_more_than_one_disk_to_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 11 tests in 1370.642s

OK


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1732: Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
  
TestVolumes (resigning)

test_00_check_template_cache (TestVolumes.TestVolumes) ... === TestName: 
test_00_check_template_cache | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === 
TestName: test_01_attach_new_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach, detach, and attach volume to a running VM ... === TestName: 
test_02_attach_detach_attach_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach volume to running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_03_attached_volume_reboot_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a running VM, then reboot. ... === TestName: 
test_04_detach_volume_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Detach volume from a stopped VM, then start. ... === TestName: 
test_05_detach_vol_stopped_VM_start | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a volume to a stopped virtual machine, then start VM ... === 
TestName: test_06_attach_volume_to_stopped_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Destroy and expunge VM with attached volume ... === TestName: 
test_07_destroy_expunge_VM_with_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Delete volume that was attached to a VM and is detached now ... === 
TestName: test_08_delete_volume_was_attached | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach a data disk to a VM in one account and attach another data disk to a 
VM in another account ... === TestName: 
test_09_attach_volumes_multiple_accounts | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Attach more than one disk to a VM ... === TestName: 
test_10_attach_more_than_one_disk_to_VM | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 11 tests in 1673.081s

OK


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1732: Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
  
TestVMSnapshots.py

test_01_take_VM_snapshot (TestVMSnapshots.TestVMSnapshots) ... === 
TestName: test_01_take_VM_snapshot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_02_take_VM_snapshot_with_data_disk (TestVMSnapshots.TestVMSnapshots) 
... === TestName: test_02_take_VM_snapshot_with_data_disk | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 2 tests in 608.358s

OK


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1732: Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
  
TestVMMigrationWithStorage

test_01_storage_migrate_root_and_data_disks 
(TestVMMigrationWithStorage.TestVMMigrationWithStorage) ... === TestName: 
test_01_storage_migrate_root_and_data_disks | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_02_storage_migrate_root_and_data_disks 
(TestVMMigrationWithStorage.TestVMMigrationWithStorage) ... === TestName: 
test_02_storage_migrate_root_and_data_disks | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_03_storage_migrate_root_and_data_disks_fail 
(TestVMMigrationWithStorage.TestVMMigrationWithStorage) ... === TestName: 
test_03_storage_migrate_root_and_data_disks_fail | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_04_storage_migrate_root_disk_fails 
(TestVMMigrationWithStorage.TestVMMigrationWithStorage) ... === TestName: 
test_04_storage_migrate_root_disk_fails | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_05_storage_migrate_data_disk_fails 
(TestVMMigrationWithStorage.TestVMMigrationWithStorage) ... === TestName: 
test_05_storage_migrate_data_disk_fails | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 5 tests in 2941.392s

OK


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1732: Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
  
TestSnapshots.py: The failure in test 04 makes sense as that test case is 
actually dependent upon #1600, which has not yet been merged in.

test_01_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_snapshot 
(TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) ... === TestName: 
test_01_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_snapshot | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_02_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume 
(TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) ... === TestName: 
test_02_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_03_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume_and_sf_snapshot 
(TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) ... === TestName: 
test_03_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_volume_and_sf_snapshot | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
test_04_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_snapshot_and_archiving 
(TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) ... === TestName: 
test_04_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_snapshot_and_archiving | Status : 
FAILED ===
FAIL

test_05_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_snapshot_and_revert_volume_to_snapshot 
(TestSnapshots.TestSnapshots) ... === TestName: 
test_05_create_volume_snapshot_using_sf_snapshot_and_revert_volume_to_snapshot 
| Status : SUCCESS ===
ok


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1732: Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java

[mike-tutkowski]

Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732
  
TestAddRemoveHosts.py

test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_1 
(TestAddRemoveHosts.TestAddRemoveHosts) ... === TestName: 
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_1 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_2 
(TestAddRemoveHosts.TestAddRemoveHosts) ... === TestName: 
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_2 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_3 
(TestAddRemoveHosts.TestAddRemoveHosts) ... === TestName: 
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_3 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_4 
(TestAddRemoveHosts.TestAddRemoveHosts) ... === TestName: 
test_add_remove_host_with_solidfire_plugin_4 | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 4 tests in 3435.128s

OK


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1732: Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Ja...

[mike-tutkowski]

GitHub user mike-tutkowski opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732

Switched to the official SolidFire SDK for Java

SolidFire has recently released an official SDK for Java.

I have converted the SolidFire storage plug-ins to make use of this new SDK.


http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Ccom.solidfire%7Csolidfire-sdk-java%7C1.2.0.29%7Cjar

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/mike-tutkowski/cloudstack use_sf_sdk_for_java

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1732.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1732


commit a877fdda6e0648c0a9b98f035904a901d8d66d32
Author: Mike Tutkowski 
Date:   2016-09-14T20:03:54Z

Making use of the new SolidFire SDK for Java




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---