[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-374


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1725: CLOUDSTACK-9559 Why allow deleting zone without dele...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1725
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-373


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-372


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1823: CLOUDSTACK-9594: Fix regression in test_templates

[murali-reddy]

Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1823
  
LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1823: CLOUDSTACK-9594: Fix regression in test_templates

[abhinandanprateek]

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1823
  
LGTM on code review


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1823: CLOUDSTACK-9594: Fix regression in test_templates

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1823
  
Tested this manually, the issue was with the test itself.

Test list templates with templatefilter=all is not permitted for normal 
user ... === TestName: 
test_01_list_templates_with_templatefilter_all_normal_user | Status : SUCCESS 
===  
ok  

Test list templates with templatefilter=all is not permitted for domain 
admin ... === TestName: 
test_02_list_templates_with_templatefilter_all_domain_admin | Status : SUCCESS 
=== 
ok  



--  

Ran 2 tests in 33.051s  



OK 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1823: CLOUDSTACK-9594: Fix regression in test_templ...

[rhtyd]

GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1823

CLOUDSTACK-9594: Fix regression in test_templates

Fixes regression in component test `test_templates.py`

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack 4.8-travis-templatefix

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1823.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1823


commit ae32aa13ed2b484194b7df31ac8b531c2955a51c
Author: Rohit Yadav 
Date:   2016-12-09T06:27:40Z

CLOUDSTACK-9594: Fix regression in test_templates

Fixes regression in component test `test_templates.py`

Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav 




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Master Skip Tests

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Will and Patrick,


Thanks for sharing, I think upgrading bountycastle was a much needed security 
effort. I think applying the patch that I shared on 4.9/master should not be 
required now so I'll skip that, unless you tell me otherwise.


At some point, we can update the wiki about the build tool versions. Ideally, 
you would want to use the latest JDK/JRE 1.7.x release as generally the minor 
releases have security fixes etc.


Generally, Travis is a good place to find tool versions, build scripts/commands 
etc, we currently have it configured to use a Ubuntu 14.04 based boxes. The 
before_script output starts by printing env details, for example: 
https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/jobs/182371318


Regards.


From: williamstev...@gmail.com  on behalf of Will 
Stevens 
Sent: 09 December 2016 03:37:26
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Master Skip Tests

Here are the versions I was running:

$ mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.1.1 (0728685237757ffbf44136acec0402957f723d9a; 2013-09-17
11:22:22-0400)
Maven home: /path/to/my/apache-maven-3.1.1
Java version: 1.7.0_40, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_
40.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.11.6", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac"

I have upgraded to:
Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T11:41:47-05:00)

I ran:
mvn clean install -U

But I still have the issue.

I apply the patch, but still get the same error (just a different line
number).

I upgrade Java from 1.7.0_40 to 1.7.0_80, now I have it working.

We will want to make sure we specify minimum requirements at some point for
this, but glad to see it is just a requirements thing.  :)

Is the patch for the test going to be added to master at some point?

Keep up the good work. +1

Cheers,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer



On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Patrick Dube 
wrote:

> Hey Rohit,
>
> I upgraded to mvn 3.3.9 and it worked
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Patrick Dube 
> wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> > I tried adding those lines without success.
> > Still getting:
> >
> > Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
> >
> > 2016-12-08 15:16:13,276 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> > [ignored]error during public key encryption: Unsupported format
> >
> > 2016-12-08 15:16:13,618 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> > [ignored]error during public key encryption: JCE cannot authenticate the
> > provider BC
> >
> > Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.721 sec
> > <<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
> >
> > testEncryptWithRSA(com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest)  Time elapsed:
> > 0.34 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> >
> > java.lang.AssertionError: null
> >
> > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
> >
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
> >
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:712)
> >
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:722)
> >
> > at com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA(
> > RSAHelperTest.java:45)
> >
> >
> > I checked my mvn version. I am running mvn 3.2.1 and JDK 1.7.0_55. I also
> > tried updating the dependencies (-U)
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Will and Patrick,
> >>
> >> I'm not able to reproduce the issue, we've recently upgraded the
> >> bountycastle dependency to v1.55 on both 4.9 and master branch.
> >> Travis too appears to pass and along with that Trillian/blueorangutan
> >> based
> >> packaging: https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/182254749
> >>
> >> Can you check if you're using JDK 1.7? Is your JDK/dependencies able to
> >> provide for BC. In the failing test, can you try and see if with
> following
> >> changes your unit test pass:
> >>
> >> --- a/utils/src/test/java/com/cloud/utils/crypto/RSAHelperTest.java
> >> +++ b/utils/src/test/java/com/cloud/utils/crypto/RSAHelperTest.java
> >> @@ -22,11 +22,18 @@ package com.cloud.utils.crypto;
> >>  import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
> >>  import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull;
> >>
> >> +import org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider;
> >>  import org.junit.Test;
> >>
> >>  import com.cloud.utils.crypt.RSAHelper;
> >> +import java.security.Security;
> >>
> >>  public class RSAHelperTest {
> >> +
> >> +public RSAHelperTest() {
> >> +Security.addProvider(new BouncyCastleProvider());
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>
> >> For reference, here is my Maven/JDK/env details:
> >>
> >> $ mvn -version
> >> Apache Maven 3.3.9
> >> Maven home: /usr/share/maven
> >> Java version: 1.7.0_80, vendor: Oracle Corporation
> >> Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre
> >> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> >> OS name: "linux", 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1700: CLOUDSTACK-9359: IPv6 for Basic Networking

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1700
  
@wido due to the scope of the changes, I'll hold this PR until releases 
graduate. We'll get back to reviewing, testing this after the branches are cut. 
/cc @murali-reddy @abhinandanprateek pinging for review


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1725: CLOUDSTACK-9559 Why allow deleting zone without dele...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1725
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1725: CLOUDSTACK-9559 Why allow deleting zone without dele...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1725
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1759: CLOUDSTACK-9589 vmName entries from host_details tab...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1759
  
@yvsubhash can you move the changes to 490to4910.sql ? Also rebase against 
latest 4.9, squash your changes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1257: CLOUDSTACK-9175: [VMware DRS] Adding new host to DRS...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1257: CLOUDSTACK-9175: [VMware DRS] Adding new host to DRS...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
  
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1244: Bug-ID: CLOUDSTACK-8654: Added guest_os mappings for...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1244
  
@kishankavala can you move the sql changes to 
setup/db/db/schema-490to4910.sql ?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
@syed @karuturi can you help fix the merge conflict, and rebase against 
latest 4.9. Thanks. Can commits be logically squashed, and have a JIRA id in 
their commit summary.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1752: [4.8] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been 
kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1752: [4.8] Latest health test run

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1711: XenServer 7 Support

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
  
Yes. I think its ready code wise. since the last test run, lot of code 
changes happened. If we can run one more round of tests, that would be good.

regarding squashing, 
Please don't do that. The three commits are different and cannot be merged 
to a single commit. probably, we can get rid of the merge commit.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #827: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-8849: Usage job should stop usage ...

[yvsubhash]

Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/827
  
@ustcweizhou By stopping the usage server, we can fix the records and 
continue in the next run. If we simply skip we wont come to know abt the 
records with errors. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1244: Bug-ID: CLOUDSTACK-8654: Added guest_os mappings for...

[sateesh-chodapuneedi]

Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1244
  
@rhtyd I think this would be useful for 4.9. 
@kishankavala Can you please rebase this fix?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

[sateesh-chodapuneedi]

Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
Thanks @rhtyd for merging this.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Master Skip Tests

[Will Stevens]

Here are the versions I was running:

$ mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.1.1 (0728685237757ffbf44136acec0402957f723d9a; 2013-09-17
11:22:22-0400)
Maven home: /path/to/my/apache-maven-3.1.1
Java version: 1.7.0_40, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_
40.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.11.6", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac"

I have upgraded to:
Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T11:41:47-05:00)

I ran:
mvn clean install -U

But I still have the issue.

I apply the patch, but still get the same error (just a different line
number).

I upgrade Java from 1.7.0_40 to 1.7.0_80, now I have it working.

We will want to make sure we specify minimum requirements at some point for
this, but glad to see it is just a requirements thing.  :)

Is the patch for the test going to be added to master at some point?

Keep up the good work. +1

Cheers,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer



On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Patrick Dube 
wrote:

> Hey Rohit,
>
> I upgraded to mvn 3.3.9 and it worked
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Patrick Dube 
> wrote:
>
> > Hey,
> >
> > I tried adding those lines without success.
> > Still getting:
> >
> > Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
> >
> > 2016-12-08 15:16:13,276 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> > [ignored]error during public key encryption: Unsupported format
> >
> > 2016-12-08 15:16:13,618 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> > [ignored]error during public key encryption: JCE cannot authenticate the
> > provider BC
> >
> > Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.721 sec
> > <<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
> >
> > testEncryptWithRSA(com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest)  Time elapsed:
> > 0.34 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> >
> > java.lang.AssertionError: null
> >
> > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
> >
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
> >
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:712)
> >
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:722)
> >
> > at com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA(
> > RSAHelperTest.java:45)
> >
> >
> > I checked my mvn version. I am running mvn 3.2.1 and JDK 1.7.0_55. I also
> > tried updating the dependencies (-U)
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Will and Patrick,
> >>
> >> I'm not able to reproduce the issue, we've recently upgraded the
> >> bountycastle dependency to v1.55 on both 4.9 and master branch.
> >> Travis too appears to pass and along with that Trillian/blueorangutan
> >> based
> >> packaging: https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/182254749
> >>
> >> Can you check if you're using JDK 1.7? Is your JDK/dependencies able to
> >> provide for BC. In the failing test, can you try and see if with
> following
> >> changes your unit test pass:
> >>
> >> --- a/utils/src/test/java/com/cloud/utils/crypto/RSAHelperTest.java
> >> +++ b/utils/src/test/java/com/cloud/utils/crypto/RSAHelperTest.java
> >> @@ -22,11 +22,18 @@ package com.cloud.utils.crypto;
> >>  import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
> >>  import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull;
> >>
> >> +import org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider;
> >>  import org.junit.Test;
> >>
> >>  import com.cloud.utils.crypt.RSAHelper;
> >> +import java.security.Security;
> >>
> >>  public class RSAHelperTest {
> >> +
> >> +public RSAHelperTest() {
> >> +Security.addProvider(new BouncyCastleProvider());
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>
> >> For reference, here is my Maven/JDK/env details:
> >>
> >> $ mvn -version
> >> Apache Maven 3.3.9
> >> Maven home: /usr/share/maven
> >> Java version: 1.7.0_80, vendor: Oracle Corporation
> >> Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre
> >> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> >> OS name: "linux", version: "4.4.0-45-generic", arch: "amd64", family:
> >> "unix"
> >>
> >> Regards.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Will Stevens 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hey Guys,
> >> > I am not able to build master right now.  I can build it if I specify
> >> "",
> >> > but if I let the tests run, I get the following error.
> >> >
> >> > Running com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
> >> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,099 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
> >> > (Thread-0:) Thread Thread-0 interrupted while waiting for retry
> >> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> >> > (main:) thread started
> >> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> >> > (Thread-1:) before
> >> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,306 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> >> > (main:) testing wakeup
> >> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
> >> > (Thread-1:) 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Trillian test result (tid-628)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 25636 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1753-t628-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 47 look ok, 1 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 354.39 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 159.04 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 81.02 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 244.99 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 253.75 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 500.95 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 503.25 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1386.29 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 541.79 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 728.28 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1293.92 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.26 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.34 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.20 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.17 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.14 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.21 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 43.67 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 711.29 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 277.06 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.50 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.20 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 35.62 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 130.62 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.61 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 5.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 95.53 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.07 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.15 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 35.26 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 191.34 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 132.99 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 161.34 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 132.99 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 0.92 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 2.81 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.07 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 10.96 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 209.18 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.03 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.07 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.08 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.11 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 40.26 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 35.22 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.11 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.02 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.65 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 60.59 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 0.82 | test_routers.py
test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.43 | 

Re: Master Skip Tests

[Patrick Dube]

To be clear, I applied the patch you provided as well.

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Patrick Dube 
wrote:

> Hey Rohit,
>
> I upgraded to mvn 3.3.9 and it worked
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Patrick Dube 
> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I tried adding those lines without success.
>> Still getting:
>>
>> Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
>>
>> 2016-12-08 15:16:13,276 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
>> [ignored]error during public key encryption: Unsupported format
>>
>> 2016-12-08 15:16:13,618 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
>> [ignored]error during public key encryption: JCE cannot authenticate the
>> provider BC
>>
>> Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.721 sec
>> <<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
>>
>> testEncryptWithRSA(com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest)  Time elapsed:
>> 0.34 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>>
>> java.lang.AssertionError: null
>>
>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
>>
>> at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
>>
>> at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:712)
>>
>> at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:722)
>>
>> at com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA(RSAH
>> elperTest.java:45)
>>
>>
>> I checked my mvn version. I am running mvn 3.2.1 and JDK 1.7.0_55. I also
>> tried updating the dependencies (-U)
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Will and Patrick,
>>>
>>> I'm not able to reproduce the issue, we've recently upgraded the
>>> bountycastle dependency to v1.55 on both 4.9 and master branch.
>>> Travis too appears to pass and along with that Trillian/blueorangutan
>>> based
>>> packaging: https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/182254749
>>>
>>> Can you check if you're using JDK 1.7? Is your JDK/dependencies able to
>>> provide for BC. In the failing test, can you try and see if with
>>> following
>>> changes your unit test pass:
>>>
>>> --- a/utils/src/test/java/com/cloud/utils/crypto/RSAHelperTest.java
>>> +++ b/utils/src/test/java/com/cloud/utils/crypto/RSAHelperTest.java
>>> @@ -22,11 +22,18 @@ package com.cloud.utils.crypto;
>>>  import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
>>>  import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull;
>>>
>>> +import org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider;
>>>  import org.junit.Test;
>>>
>>>  import com.cloud.utils.crypt.RSAHelper;
>>> +import java.security.Security;
>>>
>>>  public class RSAHelperTest {
>>> +
>>> +public RSAHelperTest() {
>>> +Security.addProvider(new BouncyCastleProvider());
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>
>>> For reference, here is my Maven/JDK/env details:
>>>
>>> $ mvn -version
>>> Apache Maven 3.3.9
>>> Maven home: /usr/share/maven
>>> Java version: 1.7.0_80, vendor: Oracle Corporation
>>> Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre
>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
>>> OS name: "linux", version: "4.4.0-45-generic", arch: "amd64", family:
>>> "unix"
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Will Stevens 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hey Guys,
>>> > I am not able to build master right now.  I can build it if I specify
>>> "",
>>> > but if I let the tests run, I get the following error.
>>> >
>>> > Running com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
>>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,099 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
>>> > (Thread-0:) Thread Thread-0 interrupted while waiting for retry
>>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
>>> > (main:) thread started
>>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
>>> > (Thread-1:) before
>>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,306 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
>>> > (main:) testing wakeup
>>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
>>> > (Thread-1:) Thread Thread-1 interrupted while waiting for retry
>>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
>>> > (Thread-1:) after
>>> > Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.524
>>> sec
>>> > - in com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
>>> > Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
>>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,317 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
>>> > (main:) Encryption Type: null
>>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,320 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
>>> > (main:) Encryption Type: file
>>> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.015
>>> sec
>>> > - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
>>> > Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
>>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,639 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
>>> > [ignored]error during public key encryption: Unsupported format
>>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:29,196 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
>>> > [ignored]error during public key encryption: JCE cannot authenticate
>>> the
>>> > 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1257: CLOUDSTACK-9175: [VMware DRS] Adding new host to DRS...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-371


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-369


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1257: CLOUDSTACK-9175: [VMware DRS] Adding new host to DRS...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✖debian. JID-370


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✖debian. JID-368


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[syed]

Github user syed commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@mike-tutkowski Sure. I can review in the weekend


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-367


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Master Skip Tests

[Patrick Dube]

Hey Rohit,

I upgraded to mvn 3.3.9 and it worked

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Patrick Dube 
wrote:

> Hey,
>
> I tried adding those lines without success.
> Still getting:
>
> Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
>
> 2016-12-08 15:16:13,276 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> [ignored]error during public key encryption: Unsupported format
>
> 2016-12-08 15:16:13,618 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> [ignored]error during public key encryption: JCE cannot authenticate the
> provider BC
>
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.721 sec
> <<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
>
> testEncryptWithRSA(com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest)  Time elapsed:
> 0.34 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>
> java.lang.AssertionError: null
>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
>
> at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
>
> at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:712)
>
> at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:722)
>
> at com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA(
> RSAHelperTest.java:45)
>
>
> I checked my mvn version. I am running mvn 3.2.1 and JDK 1.7.0_55. I also
> tried updating the dependencies (-U)
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
>> Hi Will and Patrick,
>>
>> I'm not able to reproduce the issue, we've recently upgraded the
>> bountycastle dependency to v1.55 on both 4.9 and master branch.
>> Travis too appears to pass and along with that Trillian/blueorangutan
>> based
>> packaging: https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/182254749
>>
>> Can you check if you're using JDK 1.7? Is your JDK/dependencies able to
>> provide for BC. In the failing test, can you try and see if with following
>> changes your unit test pass:
>>
>> --- a/utils/src/test/java/com/cloud/utils/crypto/RSAHelperTest.java
>> +++ b/utils/src/test/java/com/cloud/utils/crypto/RSAHelperTest.java
>> @@ -22,11 +22,18 @@ package com.cloud.utils.crypto;
>>  import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
>>  import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull;
>>
>> +import org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider;
>>  import org.junit.Test;
>>
>>  import com.cloud.utils.crypt.RSAHelper;
>> +import java.security.Security;
>>
>>  public class RSAHelperTest {
>> +
>> +public RSAHelperTest() {
>> +Security.addProvider(new BouncyCastleProvider());
>> +}
>> +
>>
>> For reference, here is my Maven/JDK/env details:
>>
>> $ mvn -version
>> Apache Maven 3.3.9
>> Maven home: /usr/share/maven
>> Java version: 1.7.0_80, vendor: Oracle Corporation
>> Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre
>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
>> OS name: "linux", version: "4.4.0-45-generic", arch: "amd64", family:
>> "unix"
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Will Stevens 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey Guys,
>> > I am not able to build master right now.  I can build it if I specify
>> "",
>> > but if I let the tests run, I get the following error.
>> >
>> > Running com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,099 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
>> > (Thread-0:) Thread Thread-0 interrupted while waiting for retry
>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
>> > (main:) thread started
>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
>> > (Thread-1:) before
>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,306 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
>> > (main:) testing wakeup
>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
>> > (Thread-1:) Thread Thread-1 interrupted while waiting for retry
>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
>> > (Thread-1:) after
>> > Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.524
>> sec
>> > - in com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
>> > Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,317 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
>> > (main:) Encryption Type: null
>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,320 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
>> > (main:) Encryption Type: file
>> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.015
>> sec
>> > - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
>> > Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,639 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
>> > [ignored]error during public key encryption: Unsupported format
>> > 2016-12-08 13:29:29,196 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
>> > [ignored]error during public key encryption: JCE cannot authenticate the
>> > provider BC
>> > Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.871
>> sec
>> > <<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
>> > testEncryptWithRSA(com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest)  Time elapsed:
>> > 0.561 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>> > 

Re: Master Skip Tests

[Patrick Dube]

Hey,

I tried adding those lines without success.
Still getting:

Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest

2016-12-08 15:16:13,276 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
[ignored]error during public key encryption: Unsupported format

2016-12-08 15:16:13,618 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
[ignored]error during public key encryption: JCE cannot authenticate the
provider BC

Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.721 sec
<<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest

testEncryptWithRSA(com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest)  Time elapsed:
0.34 sec  <<< FAILURE!

java.lang.AssertionError: null

at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)

at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)

at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:712)

at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:722)

at
com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA(RSAHelperTest.java:45)


I checked my mvn version. I am running mvn 3.2.1 and JDK 1.7.0_55. I also
tried updating the dependencies (-U)

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:

> Hi Will and Patrick,
>
> I'm not able to reproduce the issue, we've recently upgraded the
> bountycastle dependency to v1.55 on both 4.9 and master branch.
> Travis too appears to pass and along with that Trillian/blueorangutan based
> packaging: https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/182254749
>
> Can you check if you're using JDK 1.7? Is your JDK/dependencies able to
> provide for BC. In the failing test, can you try and see if with following
> changes your unit test pass:
>
> --- a/utils/src/test/java/com/cloud/utils/crypto/RSAHelperTest.java
> +++ b/utils/src/test/java/com/cloud/utils/crypto/RSAHelperTest.java
> @@ -22,11 +22,18 @@ package com.cloud.utils.crypto;
>  import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
>  import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull;
>
> +import org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider;
>  import org.junit.Test;
>
>  import com.cloud.utils.crypt.RSAHelper;
> +import java.security.Security;
>
>  public class RSAHelperTest {
> +
> +public RSAHelperTest() {
> +Security.addProvider(new BouncyCastleProvider());
> +}
> +
>
> For reference, here is my Maven/JDK/env details:
>
> $ mvn -version
> Apache Maven 3.3.9
> Maven home: /usr/share/maven
> Java version: 1.7.0_80, vendor: Oracle Corporation
> Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> OS name: "linux", version: "4.4.0-45-generic", arch: "amd64", family:
> "unix"
>
> Regards.
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Will Stevens 
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Guys,
> > I am not able to build master right now.  I can build it if I specify "",
> > but if I let the tests run, I get the following error.
> >
> > Running com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,099 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
> > (Thread-0:) Thread Thread-0 interrupted while waiting for retry
> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> > (main:) thread started
> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> > (Thread-1:) before
> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,306 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> > (main:) testing wakeup
> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
> > (Thread-1:) Thread Thread-1 interrupted while waiting for retry
> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> > (Thread-1:) after
> > Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.524 sec
> > - in com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
> > Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,317 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
> > (main:) Encryption Type: null
> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,320 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
> > (main:) Encryption Type: file
> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.015 sec
> > - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
> > Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
> > 2016-12-08 13:29:28,639 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> > [ignored]error during public key encryption: Unsupported format
> > 2016-12-08 13:29:29,196 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> > [ignored]error during public key encryption: JCE cannot authenticate the
> > provider BC
> > Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.871 sec
> > <<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
> > testEncryptWithRSA(com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest)  Time elapsed:
> > 0.561 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> > java.lang.AssertionError: null
> > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:712)
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:722)
> > at com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA(
> > 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-366


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-365


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-364


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1257: CLOUDSTACK-9175: [VMware DRS] Adding new host to DRS...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1257: CLOUDSTACK-9175: [VMware DRS] Adding new host to DRS...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Master Skip Tests

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Will and Patrick,

I'm not able to reproduce the issue, we've recently upgraded the
bountycastle dependency to v1.55 on both 4.9 and master branch.
Travis too appears to pass and along with that Trillian/blueorangutan based
packaging: https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/builds/182254749

Can you check if you're using JDK 1.7? Is your JDK/dependencies able to
provide for BC. In the failing test, can you try and see if with following
changes your unit test pass:

--- a/utils/src/test/java/com/cloud/utils/crypto/RSAHelperTest.java
+++ b/utils/src/test/java/com/cloud/utils/crypto/RSAHelperTest.java
@@ -22,11 +22,18 @@ package com.cloud.utils.crypto;
 import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
 import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull;

+import org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider;
 import org.junit.Test;

 import com.cloud.utils.crypt.RSAHelper;
+import java.security.Security;

 public class RSAHelperTest {
+
+public RSAHelperTest() {
+Security.addProvider(new BouncyCastleProvider());
+}
+

For reference, here is my Maven/JDK/env details:

$ mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.3.9
Maven home: /usr/share/maven
Java version: 1.7.0_80, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle/jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version: "4.4.0-45-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix"

Regards.

On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Will Stevens  wrote:

> Hey Guys,
> I am not able to build master right now.  I can build it if I specify "",
> but if I let the tests run, I get the following error.
>
> Running com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,099 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
> (Thread-0:) Thread Thread-0 interrupted while waiting for retry
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> (main:) thread started
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> (Thread-1:) before
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,306 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> (main:) testing wakeup
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
> (Thread-1:) Thread Thread-1 interrupted while waiting for retry
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> (Thread-1:) after
> Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.524 sec
> - in com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
> Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,317 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
> (main:) Encryption Type: null
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,320 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
> (main:) Encryption Type: file
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.015 sec
> - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
> Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,639 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> [ignored]error during public key encryption: Unsupported format
> 2016-12-08 13:29:29,196 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> [ignored]error during public key encryption: JCE cannot authenticate the
> provider BC
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.871 sec
> <<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
> testEncryptWithRSA(com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest)  Time elapsed:
> 0.561 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: null
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:712)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:722)
> at com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA(
> RSAHelperTest.java:38)
> ...
> Failed tests:
>   RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA:38 null
>
> Is this a known issue?
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> 
>
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1257: CLOUDSTACK-9175: [VMware DRS] Adding new host to DRS...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1257: CLOUDSTACK-9175: [VMware DRS] Adding new host to DRS...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1257
  
@sureshanaparti thanks, I'll kick some tests.
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage b...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820
  
@pdube sure, you're welcome. Trying my best to include as many useful 
bugfix PRs as possible before the RC is cut on Monday.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1796: CLOUDSTACK-9626: Instance fails to start after unsuc...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1796
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1749: CLOUDSTACK-9619: Updates for SAN-assisted snapshots

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1817: CLOUDSTACK-9654 Missing hypervisor mapping of variou...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1817
  
LGTM, this is db related change. Travis has validated this (the failure is 
due to one intermittent issue, recently fixed). Merging this based on manual 
testing against my 4.9 based db.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage b...

[pdube]

Github user pdube commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820
  
@rhtyd Thanks for the speedy responses


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
@jayapalu can you change PR's base branch to 4.9 as well? How 
blocking/critical is this PR?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
@murali-reddy  can you help review this, thanks.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@serg38 yes, a blocker has been fixed now by @murali-reddy . You can see 
#1821 most tests (except rvr/vpc tests which are known to cause intermittent 
failures) are passing now. I'll rekick tests now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates template...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in ...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1396: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch typ...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage b...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820
  
LGTM, verified manually. Merging this based on usage related tests. 
Trillian smoke tests don't cover usage server to the extent of changes.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1396: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch type for M...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396
  
LGTM. Thanks @borisstoyanov for helping with the verification. Merging this 
since this is a pure UI change, no trillian tests are required.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
Merging this based on code review and test results.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Master Skip Tests

[Patrick Dube]

Same error on 4.9

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Will Stevens  wrote:

> Hey Guys,
> I am not able to build master right now.  I can build it if I specify "",
> but if I let the tests run, I get the following error.
>
> Running com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,099 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
> (Thread-0:) Thread Thread-0 interrupted while waiting for retry
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> (main:) thread started
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> (Thread-1:) before
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,306 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> (main:) testing wakeup
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
> (Thread-1:) Thread Thread-1 interrupted while waiting for retry
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
> (Thread-1:) after
> Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.524 sec -
> in com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
> Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,317 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
> (main:) Encryption Type: null
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,320 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
> (main:) Encryption Type: file
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.015 sec -
> in com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
> Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
> 2016-12-08 13:29:28,639 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> [ignored]error during public key encryption: Unsupported format
> 2016-12-08 13:29:29,196 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
> [ignored]error during public key encryption: JCE cannot authenticate the
> provider BC
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.871 sec
> <<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
> testEncryptWithRSA(com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest)  Time elapsed:
> 0.561 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: null
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:712)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:722)
> at
> com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA(
> RSAHelperTest.java:38)
> ...
> Failed tests:
>   RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA:38 null
>
> Is this a known issue?
>
> Thanks,
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> 
>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1396: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch type for M...

[sateesh-chodapuneedi]

Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396
  
Code LGTM 👍 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage b...

[pdube]

Github user pdube commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820
  
@rhtyd Changed the PR to be against 4.9


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Master Skip Tests

[Will Stevens]

Hey Guys,
I am not able to build master right now.  I can build it if I specify "",
but if I let the tests run, I get the following error.

Running com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
2016-12-08 13:29:28,099 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
(Thread-0:) Thread Thread-0 interrupted while waiting for retry
2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
(main:) thread started
2016-12-08 13:29:28,202 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
(Thread-1:) before
2016-12-08 13:29:28,306 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
(main:) testing wakeup
2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 INFO  [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoff]
(Thread-1:) Thread Thread-1 interrupted while waiting for retry
2016-12-08 13:29:28,307 DEBUG [backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest]
(Thread-1:) after
Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.524 sec -
in com.cloud.utils.backoff.impl.ConstantTimeBackoffTest
Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
2016-12-08 13:29:28,317 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
(main:) Encryption Type: null
2016-12-08 13:29:28,320 DEBUG [utils.crypt.EncryptionSecretKeyChecker]
(main:) Encryption Type: file
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.015 sec -
in com.cloud.utils.crypto.EncryptionSecretKeyCheckerTest
Running com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
2016-12-08 13:29:28,639 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
[ignored]error during public key encryption: Unsupported format
2016-12-08 13:29:29,196 INFO  [utils.crypt.RSAHelper] (main:)
[ignored]error during public key encryption: JCE cannot authenticate the
provider BC
Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.871 sec
<<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest
testEncryptWithRSA(com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest)  Time elapsed:
0.561 sec  <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: null
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:712)
at org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull(Assert.java:722)
at
com.cloud.utils.crypto.RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA(RSAHelperTest.java:38)
...
Failed tests:
  RSAHelperTest.testEncryptWithRSA:38 null

Is this a known issue?

Thanks,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1396: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch type for M...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396
  
![screen shot 2016-12-08 at 8 29 24 
pm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13551960/21022364/10c60274-bd85-11e6-9637-b496eb7e0467.png)
I've deployed and verified the changes. LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1763: CLOUDSTACK-9594: API "list templates templatefilter=...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1763
  
Trillian test result (tid-625)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 26317 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1763-t625-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 42 look ok, 1 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_04_extract_Iso | `Error` | 5.92 | test_iso.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 135.27 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 61.77 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 272.31 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 298.18 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 618.04 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 517.90 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1446.17 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 568.61 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 761.93 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1316.27 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.81 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.57 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.53 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.34 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.32 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.28 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.39 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 43.84 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 683.52 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 279.61 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.89 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 36.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.99 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 126.34 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.37 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 80.93 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.34 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.13 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.09 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 61.13 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.70 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.28 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.72 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 134.31 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.84 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.93 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.35 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 4.41 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 16.33 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 210.20 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.12 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.21 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.21 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.28 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 55.66 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 40.48 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.19 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.05 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.74 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 65.68 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 1.10 | test_routers.py
test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.58 | test_routers.py
test_router_dhcphosts | 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in ...

[pdube]

GitHub user pdube reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820

CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage by setting a default 
role when not found

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9656

This is a workaround to avoid NPE when using the usage server with Projects

To reproduce bug:

Create project
Add account to project
Create VM within that project
Run the usage server

Same steps to test resolution

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/pdube/cloudstack 
CLOUDSTACK-9656-usage-exception

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1820


commit b7ac7fd2a3eddbe66c36a83b80ae6be303c01bc4
Author: Patrick Dube 
Date:   2016-12-07T19:39:28Z

Preventing autoboxing NPE by setting a default role when not found




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in ...

[pdube]

Github user pdube closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-363


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1758: CLOUDSTACK-9588: Add Load Balancer functionality in ...

[rajesh-battala]

Github user rajesh-battala commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1758
  
ok. if you find that page is not used then please feel free to remove it.
Having that page will confuse the Admin for create Firewall rules

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Nitin Kumar Maharana <
notificati...@github.com> wrote:

> @rajesh-battala  : I went through the
> video but couldn't observe working on the add load balancer part. He
> touched the egress rules part. BTW, the tab was added in this commit
> 196e36d
> 
.
> I looked at the code change as well, which is very similar to what we do 
in
> case of load balancing section with an IP address.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> ,
> or mute the thread
> 

> .
>



-- 
Thanks
Rajesh Battala



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1722: CLOUDSTACK-9558 Cleanup the snapshots on the ...

[yvsubhash]

Github user yvsubhash commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1722#discussion_r91570095
  
--- Diff: 
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java
 ---
@@ -260,11 +260,15 @@ public boolean deleteSnapshot(Long snapshotId) {
 boolean result = deleteSnapshotChain(snapshotOnImage);
 obj.processEvent(Snapshot.Event.OperationSucceeded);
 if (result) {
-//snapshot is deleted on backup storage, need to delete it 
on primary storage
-SnapshotDataStoreVO snapshotOnPrimary = 
snapshotStoreDao.findBySnapshot(snapshotId, DataStoreRole.Primary);
-if (snapshotOnPrimary != null) {
-snapshotOnPrimary.setState(State.Destroyed);
-snapshotStoreDao.update(snapshotOnPrimary.getId(), 
snapshotOnPrimary);
+SnapshotInfo snapshotOnPrimary = 
snapshotDataFactory.getSnapshot(snapshotId, DataStoreRole.Primary);
+if(snapshotSvr.deleteSnapshot(snapshotOnPrimary)) {
--- End diff --

If the db state is set to 'destroyed', it would no longer visible in the ui 
and entry would be left behind in primary. Leaving it as is keeps the option of 
manual cleanup 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1722: CLOUDSTACK-9558 Cleanup the snapshots on the ...

[yvsubhash]

Github user yvsubhash commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1722#discussion_r91569719
  
--- Diff: 
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java
 ---
@@ -260,11 +260,15 @@ public boolean deleteSnapshot(Long snapshotId) {
 boolean result = deleteSnapshotChain(snapshotOnImage);
 obj.processEvent(Snapshot.Event.OperationSucceeded);
 if (result) {
-//snapshot is deleted on backup storage, need to delete it 
on primary storage
-SnapshotDataStoreVO snapshotOnPrimary = 
snapshotStoreDao.findBySnapshot(snapshotId, DataStoreRole.Primary);
-if (snapshotOnPrimary != null) {
-snapshotOnPrimary.setState(State.Destroyed);
-snapshotStoreDao.update(snapshotOnPrimary.getId(), 
snapshotOnPrimary);
+SnapshotInfo snapshotOnPrimary = 
snapshotDataFactory.getSnapshot(snapshotId, DataStoreRole.Primary);
--- End diff --

Yes it should be updated in this case as well. It is taken care


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1783: CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1821: CLOUDSTACK-9659: mismatch in traffic type in ip_asso...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1821
  
Trillian test result (tid-622)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 27762 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1821-t622-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 46 look ok, 2 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 869.05 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 412.06 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 180.04 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 66.34 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 251.07 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 276.93 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 558.53 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 533.00 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1340.36 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 599.28 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1310.36 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 15.53 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 15.38 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 20.47 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.30 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.18 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.26 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 73.76 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 711.38 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 277.82 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.68 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 41.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.84 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.84 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.34 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 101.49 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.15 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.16 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 45.56 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.84 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 193.97 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.74 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 134.07 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.80 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 144.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.42 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 5.22 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.19 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.17 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.72 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.93 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.06 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.16 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.16 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.23 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.44 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 30.40 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.23 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.07 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.05 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.76 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 60.61 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 1.03 | test_routers.py
test_01_router_internal_basic | Success | 0.55 | 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[serg38]

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
@rhtyd We seem to have consistently more tests failing lately


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
Trillian test result (tid-616)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 41021 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1754-t616-xenserver-65sp1.zip
Test completed. 41 look ok, 8 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 1055.21 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Failure` | 1065.38 | 
test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 432.25 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 254.47 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Failure` | 270.48 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 368.84 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 436.74 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 43.41 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1700.34 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 1219.30 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1231.37 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 43.75 | 
test_password_server.py
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 724.15 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 460.36 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 801.84 | test_vpc_vpn.py
ContextSuite context=TestVpcSite2SiteVpn>:setup | `Error` | 1768.95 | 
test_vpc_vpn.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Error` | 740.27 | test_vpc_redundant.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 83.98 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_01_nic | `Error` | 402.82 | test_nic.py
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 525.49 
| test_internal_lb.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 430.92 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 162.11 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 16.00 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 96.66 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 97.84 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 35.83 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.41 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.37 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.80 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 10.95 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 438.20 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 280.32 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 176.66 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.93 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 380.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.04 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.80 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 185.37 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 66.50 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 15.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 20.48 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 25.37 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 35.60 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 161.87 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.10 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.05 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.13 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.24 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.28 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.22 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 91.51 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 257.72 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 271.23 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 111.89 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 159.91 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 132.67 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 240.31 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.39 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 5.14 | test_ssvm.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1754: [4.10] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
  
Trillian test result (tid-618)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 39074 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1754-t618-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 40 look ok, 9 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 1190.31 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Failure` | 1160.57 | 
test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 481.48 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 325.09 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Failure` | 381.43 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 518.46 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 423.88 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 37.94 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 121.74 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 272.92 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1383.11 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 68.89 | 
test_password_server.py
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 701.96 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 530.79 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 604.60 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 850.83 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Error` | 577.82 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_reboot_router | `Error` | 5.16 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | `Error` | 131.20 | test_routers.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 53.15 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
ContextSuite context=TestPortForwarding>:setup | `Error` | 723.56 | 
test_network.py
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 620.07 
| test_internal_lb.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 499.60 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 171.78 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 26.29 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 70.77 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 110.39 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.59 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.44 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 63.86 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 520.71 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.23 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 220.22 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 161.77 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.74 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 288.32 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.97 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 81.59 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.23 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 353.86 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 15.79 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.12 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.19 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 172.37 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 237.36 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 234.30 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.88 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 161.10 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 207.32 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 214.36 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1810: CLOUDSTACK-9647: NIC adapter type becomes e1000 , ev...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1810
  
Trillian test result (tid-615)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 37304 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1810-t615-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 40 look ok, 8 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 1136.24 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | `Failure` | 1051.84 | 
test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Failure` | 438.50 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
`Failure` | 335.98 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 386.46 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 385.76 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 65.85 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 121.74 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 1424.86 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 1384.86 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 71.33 | 
test_password_server.py
test_04_rvpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Failure` | 
207.30 | test_internal_lb.py
test_02_internallb_roundrobin_1RVPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 670.56 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_internallb_roundrobin_1VPC_3VM_HTTP_port80 | `Failure` | 585.43 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 609.87 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 810.91 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | `Error` | 525.05 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Error` | 127.13 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | `Error` | 330.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 86.15 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_03_vpc_internallb_haproxy_stats_on_all_interfaces | `Error` | 494.46 | 
test_internal_lb.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 176.92 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 35.92 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 65.63 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 105.29 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 20.35 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 63.86 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 537.75 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.24 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 194.68 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 166.89 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 165.23 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.05 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.04 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 27.09 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 71.49 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 10.33 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 30.39 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.21 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 217.32 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 25.75 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.19 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.18 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 156.46 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 207.23 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 239.46 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.66 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 158.52 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 177.19 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 209.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.34 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.78 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.24 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.21 | test_ssvm.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1820: CLOUDSTACK-9656 Preventing autoboxing NPE in Usage b...

[pdube]

Github user pdube commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1820
  
Ok will do, thanks


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1396: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch type for M...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396
  
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-362


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---