RE: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Hard Freeze

[Marty Godsey]

XenServer 7 support would be an amazing Holiday present.. :)

Regards,
Marty Godsey
Principal Engineer
nSource Solutions, LLC

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 10:30 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Hard Freeze

All,


Given the upcoming holidays, and missed set dates for 4.10.0.0-rc1, we'll be 
unfreezing the master branches to accept few more bugfixes and feature PRs.


I will work with the community towards reviewing, testing and merging few 
useful PRs such as support for XenServer7, the strongswan PR, spring4 migration 
and others. I would be willing to help anyone else take the lead as the RM on 
4.10/master while I'll continue to work towards the next LTS minor release 
(4.9.2.0) that will include some of the useful PRs that could not make into 4.9.


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 10 December 2016 08:30:15
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Hard Freeze

All,


This is declare a hard freeze on 4.8, 4.9 branches, I'll cut RCs for them 
shortly. Master is experiencing some failures, so I'll keep it open until 
Monday (next week) to allow us to include PR 1749 and other bugfixes.


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 09 December 2016 13:45:38
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Hard Freeze

All,


This is a final reminder for PR authors who would like to see their PRs merged 
on 4.8/4.9/master branches need to work with me, fix their PRs and engage/close 
discussions. This weekend, we'll do a final test run on 4.8/4.9/master branches 
before the first RC is cut. Thank you for your contributions.


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 08 December 2016 17:35:03
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Hard Freeze

All,


As shared on the RC status thread, we've only few outstanding PRs that are 
critical for the 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 releases. We'll have an agreed hard 
freeze on 4.8, 4.9, and master branch at the end of the week. On Monday, 12 
December we'll cut the first set of RCs, test them and only accept blocker 
fixes on the 4.8/4.9/master branches.


Regards.

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
  
 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Trillian test result (tid-688)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 38915 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1753-t688-vmware-55u3.zip
Test completed. 41 look ok, 7 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | `Failure` | 181.29 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 29.16 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 333.20 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 253.00 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 97.48 | 
test_password_server.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 623.10 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 874.44 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | `Error` | 166.14 | test_templates.py
test_09_reboot_router | `Error` | 5.14 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | `Error` | 156.11 | test_routers.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 49.45 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
ContextSuite context=TestListIdsParams>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 385.55 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 793.07 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 865.84 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1575.17 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 850.82 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 709.99 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1497.93 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 36.31 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 70.68 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 105.24 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 15.29 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 25.36 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 53.87 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 522.01 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.27 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 232.28 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 191.53 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.78 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 272.75 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 27.00 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.19 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 111.40 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.10 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 20.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 15.29 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.12 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.19 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 166.22 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 267.02 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 239.16 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 156.60 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 190.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 207.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 264.28 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.21 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.48 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.14 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 26.33 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 102.78 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.22 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.19 | 

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[Sergey Levitskiy]

It seems we have consistently more failures in 4.9 and 4.10 than few weeks ago 
e.g. In templates, dhcphosts, list_ids

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Trillian test result (tid-687)
Environment: vmware-65 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 32652 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1753-t687-vmware-65.zip
Test completed. 42 look ok, 6 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Failure` | 105.93 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 25.14 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 136.78 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 106.66 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 28.86 | 
test_password_server.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | `Error` | 451.61 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | `Error` | 161.16 | test_templates.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 45.43 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
ContextSuite context=TestListIdsParams>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 131.76 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 334.62 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 702.98 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 615.54 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1499.04 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 651.31 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 585.31 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1302.19 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 31.06 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 75.71 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 100.29 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 10.25 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 15.31 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 53.85 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 481.29 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.24 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 227.29 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot | Success | 191.69 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 166.76 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 237.81 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 117.41 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.27 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 61.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 10.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 5.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 30.31 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 10.15 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.07 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 20.32 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.12 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.15 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 251.88 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 267.06 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 264.40 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 186.84 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 159.47 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 207.42 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 234.64 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.20 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.64 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.15 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 71.79 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 98.75 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.13 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.15 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Trillian test result (tid-686)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 31480 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1753-t686-kvm-centos7.zip
Test completed. 42 look ok, 6 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_router_dhcphosts | `Failure` | 96.32 | test_router_dhcphosts.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 386.10 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_isolate_network_password_server | `Failure` | 63.53 | 
test_password_server.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | `Error` | 10.21 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | `Error` | 5.09 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | `Error` | 10.27 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | `Error` | 5.10 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | `Error` | 5.08 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | `Error` | 5.09 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | `Error` | 5.09 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | `Error` | 311.10 | test_volumes.py
ContextSuite context=TestTemplates>:setup | `Error` | 360.40 | 
test_templates.py
ContextSuite context=TestRouterDHCPHosts>:teardown | `Error` | 232.48 | 
test_router_dhcphosts.py
ContextSuite context=TestListIdsParams>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | 
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 175.69 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 66.16 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 280.93 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 478.54 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 832.32 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 533.74 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1338.37 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 573.51 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 772.46 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1311.57 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 79.10 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 449.53 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 27.11 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.24 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.91 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.81 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.89 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.17 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 126.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 116.24 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 75.69 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.72 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 223.75 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 131.62 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.69 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 191.81 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 165.70 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.23 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.89 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.12 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.26 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.57 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.05 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.10 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.12 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.17 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 45.34 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 40.34 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.17 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py
test_05_router_basic | Success | 0.04 | test_routers.py
test_04_restart_network_wo_cleanup | Success | 5.67 | test_routers.py
test_03_restart_network_cleanup | Success | 60.48 | test_routers.py
test_02_router_internal_adv | Success | 0.99 | test_routers.py

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1753: [4.9] Latest health test run

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
  
Checked mostr


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1752: [4.8] Latest health test run

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Hard Freeze

[Rohit Yadav]

All,


Given the upcoming holidays, and missed set dates for 4.10.0.0-rc1, we'll be 
unfreezing the master branches to accept few more bugfixes and feature PRs.


I will work with the community towards reviewing, testing and merging few 
useful PRs such as support for XenServer7, the strongswan PR, spring4 migration 
and others. I would be willing to help anyone else take the lead as the RM on 
4.10/master while I'll continue to work towards the next LTS minor release 
(4.9.2.0) that will include some of the useful PRs that could not make into 4.9.


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 10 December 2016 08:30:15
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Hard Freeze

All,


This is declare a hard freeze on 4.8, 4.9 branches, I'll cut RCs for them 
shortly. Master is experiencing some failures, so I'll keep it open until 
Monday (next week) to allow us to include PR 1749 and other bugfixes.


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 09 December 2016 13:45:38
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Hard Freeze

All,


This is a final reminder for PR authors who would like to see their PRs merged 
on 4.8/4.9/master branches need to work with me, fix their PRs and engage/close 
discussions. This weekend, we'll do a final test run on 4.8/4.9/master branches 
before the first RC is cut. Thank you for your contributions.


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: 08 December 2016 17:35:03
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 RC Hard Freeze

All,


As shared on the RC status thread, we've only few outstanding PRs that are 
critical for the 4.8.2.0/4.9.1.0/4.10.0.0 releases. We'll have an agreed hard 
freeze on 4.8, 4.9, and master branch at the end of the week. On Monday, 12 
December we'll cut the first set of RCs, test them and only accept blocker 
fixes on the 4.8/4.9/master branches.


Regards.

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.9.1.0

[Rohit Yadav]

All,

After more than 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.9.1.0 [1] *passes* with 3 
PMC + 1 non-PMC votes.

+1 (PMC / binding)
3 person (Bruno, Wido, Rohit)

+1 (non binding)
1 person (Murali)

0
none

-1
none

Thanks to everyone participating.

I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give 
the mirrors time to catch up.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/bamlzfh5dfpxrzzy

Regards.


rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1834: CLOUDSTACK-9679:Allow master user to manage s...

[pdumbre]

GitHub user pdumbre opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1834

CLOUDSTACK-9679:Allow master user to manage subordinate user uploaded…

… template

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/Accelerite/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9679

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1834.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1834


commit 87849c3964c7f46bc5d1e499a16a3a20be97dd99
Author: pdumbre 
Date:   2016-12-16T13:30:26Z

CLOUDSTACK-9679:Allow master user to manage subordinate user uploaded 
template




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1833: BUG-ID:CLOUDSTACK-9678

[serg38]

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1833
  
Why this is a bug? Most of ACS searches using name field work exactly this 
way to bring list of VMs, templates etc when partial name is specified. If 
exact name match is expected it needs to be processed on a client side.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1726: CLOUDSTACK-9560 Root volume of deleted VM left unrem...

[yvsubhash]

Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
  
@ustcweizhou  thats good point. It should be removed after all download 
links expire. I will address this case


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1726: CLOUDSTACK-9560 Root volume of deleted VM left unrem...

[ustcweizhou]

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
  
@yvsubhash yes, you are right, it is 'download links', not 'volume 
snapshots'. I made changes on this long time ago and almost forgot how it works.

so, my question is, should we 'Remove' the volume after a download link is 
expired, or all download links are expired ?



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1519: Cloudstack 9339: Virtual Routers do not handl...

[dsclose]

Github user dsclose closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1519: Cloudstack 9339: Virtual Routers do not handle Multi...

[dsclose]

Github user dsclose commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519
  
@murali-reddy I haven't worked on Cloudstack for many months but one thing 
I do recall; without d582358 and bf285e1, networks with redundant virtual 
routers will simply not work.

Whether the commits are appropriate for the current codebase, however, is 
unclear. I have no way of testing them so I shall not be confusing matters by 
raising a speculative PR.

I shall close this PR now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1725: CLOUDSTACK-9559 Why allow deleting zone without dele...

[yvsubhash]

Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1725
  
@rhtyd Can you please merge this


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1726: CLOUDSTACK-9560 Root volume of deleted VM left unrem...

[yvsubhash]

Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
  
@ustcweizhou  As I understand, Volume goes to Expunged state when it is 
removed from primary and gets removed when it is removed from secondary 
storage. line 2211 to 2215 is to handle specific case where volume getting 
removed from primary But not getting removed from secondary because of the 
download link. So cleaning up the same after the downlink is expired


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1726: CLOUDSTACK-9560 Root volume of deleted VM left unrem...

[ustcweizhou]

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
  
@yvsubhash so, the question is , in what condition the volume is Expunged 
but not removed ? if it does not happen, then the change from line 2211 to 2215 
is not needed.
however, to be honest, I often see a volume is Expunged but not Removed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1726: CLOUDSTACK-9560 Root volume of deleted VM left unrem...

[yvsubhash]

Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
  
@ustcweizhou  In case of volume snapsnots, volume gets set to removed 
irrespective of the presence of snapshots. I have verified the same  just now 
and I am only removing volume not any of the snapshots


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1833: BUG-ID:CLOUDSTACK-9678

[pdumbre]

GitHub user pdumbre opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1833

BUG-ID:CLOUDSTACK-9678

listNetworkOfferings API is listing all the offerings which has same prefix 
in their name

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/Accelerite/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9678

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1833.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1833


commit 613d507606b382f7d6379b07d653e335f9f09d2b
Author: pallavi_dumbre 
Date:   2016-06-15T10:07:06Z

BUG-ID:CLOUDSTACK-9678
listNetworkOfferings API is listing all the offerings which has same prefix 
in their name




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1726: CLOUDSTACK-9560 Root volume of deleted VM left unrem...

[ustcweizhou]

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
  
@yvsubhash I did not mean we need clean up the snapshots. 
in my understanding, if the volume has snapshots left, it is Expunged, but 
not marked as Removed
your change just delete one snapshot and then mark the volume as Removed, 
however, there might be other snapshots left (in this case, we should not mark 
the volume as Removed)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---