Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Hi,

I am currently trying out the PR associated with CLOUDSTACK-9827.

I have good and bad news to report:

First the good news:

Whether I create a primary storage and provide a storage tag or later edit a 
primary storage’s storage tag, the storage tag ends up in 
cloud.storage_pool_tags correctly.

The bad news:

I have an NFS SR as primary storage under CloudStack with a storage tag of 
NFS-A. I have a compute offering with a matching storage tag. I can’t seem to 
get a VM to spin up, however: It says insufficient capacity. The CPU, MHz, and 
memory are all low (and what I typically use), so I think the problem is with 
matching the storage tag.

Thanks,
Mike

On 3/8/17, 9:39 PM, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:

We currently have the below list of blockers:

BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator

CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready

CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi,

Sure, I can pull that code and test.

I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done,
I can move on to your PR.

Thanks!
Mike

On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
wrote:

Hi Mike,

Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
repeat your
tests on it?

Thanks,
Nicolas

2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
:

> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
 wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > This does seem messed up.
> >
> > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
doesn’t pick up any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> > This data used to be stored in the
cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to
storage_pool_tags?
> >
> > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine
it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >
> > No VM snapshot.
> >
> > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I
> also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> >
> >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >>
> >> I seem to have found another blocker:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" 
wrote:
> >>
> >> PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and
test
> >> results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few
more
> >> bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> ~ Rajani
> >>
> >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1868: CLOUDSTACK-9707: While using hostid parameter, vm ge...

[ustcweizhou]

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1868
  
@anshul1886 good, I will test it.
Could you please change the default value to true ?



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1868: CLOUDSTACK-9707: While using hostid parameter, vm ge...

[anshul1886]

Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1868
  
@ustcweizhou Added the global setting 
allow.deploy.vm.if.deploy.on.given.host.fails to control the behaviour. 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1989: WIP: support for multidisk OVA files

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1989
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-576


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #874: CLOUDSTACK-8897: baremetal:addHost:make host tag info...

[harikrishna-patnala]

Github user harikrishna-patnala commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/874
  
The are 2 failed test cases which are failing on all other PRs



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1582: CLOUDSTACK-9408 for the move away from download.clou...

[DaanHoogland]

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582
  
ping @rhtyd @swill @chiradeep @NuxRo @pdion891 @wido @karuturi 
I rebased
please send me any pull requests on this if you feel extra is needed.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1989: WIP: support for multidisk OVA files

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1989
  
@abhinandanprateek a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll 
keep you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1989: WIP: support for multidisk OVA files

[abhinandanprateek]

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1989
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: Modern template hosting

[Daan Hoogland]

I did some PR archeology and discovered #1582. It is a blocker and superseded 
by this discussion. Do we still think it is valid? And will people that 
contributed for this send me pull-requests on that PR? It is dated june 7thbut 
I will update it if needed!

Anybody who thinks this can be moved to future releases?

On 04/03/17 01:33, "Will Stevens"  wrote:

I will be guessing and we will see what I can come up with. :)

On Mar 3, 2017 7:09 PM, "Erik Weber"  wrote:

> Feel free to do it, I wouldn't know where to begin to ask such a
> question tbh :-)
>
> --
> Erik
>
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:51 AM, Will Stevens 
> wrote:
> > Erik, yes I think this is the right approach and covers the main problem
> > case. I can start the conversation with infra unless you would like to.
> Let
> > me know.
> >
> > We did get some statistics from the other mirrors last year, but I don't
> > think we ever had visibility into the cloud.com repository traffic.
> >
> > On Mar 3, 2017 6:42 PM, "Erik Weber"  wrote:
> >
> > It'll most likely only be an issue in the case where a mirror goes
> > down without any immediate chance of getting back up, right?
> > Could we check with ASF Infra beforehand if such case is OK to warrant
> > an urgent Jira ticket to resolve - should it happen?
> >
> > We can document all the mirrors and provide the howtos for manually
> > downloading and seeding the image as a backup.
> >
> > Do we have any traffic statistics for the current solution, or is that
> > not available at S3?
> >
> > --
> > Erik
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Will Stevens 
> > wrote:
> >> Yes Erik, I agree with you. The only thing that could add complexity in
> >> this is the fact that we don't control the domain, the ASF does (from
> what
> >> I understand).  Do we expect this to be managed by ASF infra or would
> > there
> >> be another way? Ideally the domain is community controlled so we can
> adapt
> >> in case of change without long delays.
> >>
> >> I am 100% in agreement that this is the shortest path and likely to be
> > good
> >> enough.
> >>
> >> On Mar 3, 2017 6:19 PM, "Erik Weber"  wrote:
> >>
> >> IMHO; implement it as simple as possible, use DNS RR and assume/expect
> >> mirror hosts to use the same path.
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes I know; DNS RR isn't bulletproof, but as already mentioned in this
> >> thread - mirrors rarely go down and they aren't used all that often
> >> (primarily seeding).
> >> We can keep a low TTL on the record so that we're able to remove a
> >> mirror that goes down for a significant period of time (more than
> >> hours).
> >>
> >> And yes I know, some operators might find it a burden having to set up
> >> a new vhost with another document root, but tbh if they don't care
> >> enough to do it we'll manage without that mirror.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Erik
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Will Stevens  >
> >> wrote:
> >>> I agree with Paul. Look at the list of things they have to
> >>> learn/master/care about. We don't want to add to that list, we want to
> >>> remove from that list. Make the project/product more accessible. 
Reduce
> >> the
> >>> barrier to entry...
> >>>
> >>> On Mar 3, 2017 5:50 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" 
> wrote:
> >>>
>  Seriously?
>  apt-get install apache2
> 
>  To install CloudStack, they need to know
>  - DB installation, perhaps some SQL
>  - VLAN configuration on their switches
>  - Ins-and-outs between port forwarding, static ips,
>  - NFS
>  - package management
>  - VHDs, qcow2. vmdk
>  - hyperviosrs
>  - and on and on.
> 
>  If they can figure all that out and not figure out a web server, they
> > can
>  always come to the mailing list.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Paul Angus 
>  wrote:
> 
>  > The issue is not with supporting highly experienced cloud 
operators.
> > It
>  is
>  > an issue for new users and other 'relatively' inexperienced
> operators.
>  >
>  > I have helped enough newbies and cloud operators who have been
> running
>  > their cloud for a while to know that the barriers to entry are too
> > high
>  as
>  > they are. And telling anyone that they need to create a web server
> so
>  that
>  > they can add 

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Daan Hoogland]

H Rajani, I didn't realize I had a blocker on my name. I'll have a look.

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:
> We currently have the below list of blockers:
>
> BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
> Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
> while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
> host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov
>
> CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
> http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland
>
> Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?
>
> ~ Rajani
>
> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>
> On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
> (mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sure, I can pull that code and test.
>
> I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
> middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done,
> I can move on to your PR.
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
> created this
> PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
> testing it
> and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
> repeat your
> tests on it?
>
> Thanks,
> Nicolas
>
> 2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
> :
>
>> Here’s the ticket:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>>
>> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
>  wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>>
>> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
>> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
> nvazquez can
>> you take a look?
>> >
>> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > This does seem messed up.
>> >
>> > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
> the tag
>> ends up in storage_pool_details.
>> >
>> > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
> them
>> in storage_pool_tags.
>> >
>> > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
> either
>> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
>> >
>> > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
>> >
>> > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
>> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
> doesn’t pick up any
>> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
>> >
>> > This data used to be stored in the
> cloud.storage_pool_details
>> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
> upgrade process
>> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to
> storage_pool_tags?
>> >
>> > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine
> it
>> a bit more before doing so.
>> >
>> > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
>> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > No VM snapshot.
>> >
>> > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I
>> also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
>> >
>> >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
>> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
>> >>
>> >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
> 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I seem to have found another blocker:
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
>> >>
>> >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" 
> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and
> test
>> >> results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few
> more
>> >> bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday)
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> ~ Rajani
>> >>
>> >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>> >>
>> >> On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi (
>> raj...@apache.org)
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my
>> >> previous mail.
>> >>
>> >> ~ Rajani
>> >>
>> >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>> >>
>> >> On March 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Rohit Yadav
>> >> (rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks Koushik, I did not realize Kishan had sent this
>> already.
>> >> Let's get either of the PRs merged and kick a RC2.
>> >>
>> >> Regards.
>> >>
>> >> 
>> >> From: Koushik Das 
>> >> Sent: 03 March 2017 14:14:56
>> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
>> >>
>> >> Looks like there is already a PR for the same issue
>> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1982 from Kishan.
>> >>
>> >> -Koushik
>> >>
>> >> On 03/03/17, 1:58 PM, "Rohit Yadav" <
>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1988: WIP: CLOUDSTACK-9815 intergration of ApplicationClus...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1988
  
Trillian test result (tid-937)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 33576 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1988-t937-kvm-centos7.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
Test completed. 46 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 862.57 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 334.32 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 0.03 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 159.32 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 65.78 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 245.10 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 280.74 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 522.04 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 509.04 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1415.19 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 542.68 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1277.00 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 156.05 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 156.05 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 156.06 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 156.04 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 155.61 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 145.88 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 155.98 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 95.61 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 711.00 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.18 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.76 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 158.70 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 261.82 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.01 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.57 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.16 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 45.59 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.56 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.62 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.22 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 60.42 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.17 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.07 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.09 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 25.25 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 166.46 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.55 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.41 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.53 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.58 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 163.55 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.18 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.34 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 10.89 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 237.43 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.03 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.07 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.08 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.12 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1989: WIP: support for multidisk OVA files

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1989
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-575


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #793: CLOUDSTACK-8827: Move the VM snapshots stuck in trans...

[anshul1886]

Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793
  
@koushik-das @sateesh-chodapuneedi @ramkatru @karuturi @rhtyd  Regarding 
unit tests, I can't see any useful tests can be written here which I have 
already specified the reason for. Also we have already lot of unit tests which 
are wasting time to fix. Every now and then I am coming across unit tests which 
are not written in proper way and leads to waste of effort. As far as my 
understanding of unit test goes they are to reduce effort not increase. One 
example is in this PR's last jenkins run. That build was failed because one 
test is trying to download/copy file and that failed. As per my understanding 
unit tests should not do any thing which are dependent on external environments 
failure. As those kind of failures are bound to happen. As when those happen we 
have to go and check why that is failed wasting some time to understand. So 
ultimately we are wasting lot of effort currently because of tests not properly 
written.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1989: WIP: support for multidisk OVA files

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1989
  
@abhinandanprateek a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll 
keep you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1989: WIP: support for multidisk OVA files

[abhinandanprateek]

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1989
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #793: CLOUDSTACK-8827: Move the VM snapshots stuck in trans...

[anshul1886]

Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793
  
@rhtyd Rebased the branch to latest master.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #793: CLOUDSTACK-8827: Move the VM snapshots stuck in trans...

[anshul1886]

Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793
  
@serg38 That case is already handled. Issue arises if management server 
goes down then we didn't get chance to clean things up.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #793: CLOUDSTACK-8827: Move the VM snapshots stuck i...

[anshul1886]

Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #793: CLOUDSTACK-8827: Move the VM snapshots stuck i...

[anshul1886]

GitHub user anshul1886 reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793

CLOUDSTACK-8827: Move the VM snapshots stuck in transitional states to 
stable states during managment server restart

i.e. If snapshot in creating state move it to Error state and if it is in 
reverting state move it to Ready state.

Manual tests performed

Take VM snapshot of VM
stop the management server
Verify in DB that VM snapshot is in  creating state
Start the management server
Verify that snapshot moves to ERROR state.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/anshul1886/cloudstack-1 CLOUDSTACK-8827

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/793.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #793


commit 656e855792737318b7bb5c84eea7a2a30eb6ad71
Author: Anshul Gangwar 
Date:   2015-09-09T08:51:15Z

CLOUDSTACK-8827: Move the VM snapshots stuck in transitional states to 
stable state during managment server restart
i.e. If snapshot in creating state move it to Error state and if it is in 
reverting state move it to Ready state.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Rajani Karuturi]

We currently have the below list of blockers:

BUGID - Summary - Assignee - Creator

CLOUDSTACK-9827 - Storage tags stored in multiple places -
Nicolas Vazquez - Mike Tutkowski - PR Ready

CLOUDSTACK-9811 - VR will not start, looking to configure eth3
while no such device exists on the VR. On KVM-CentOS6.8 physical
host - Unassigned - Boris Stoyanov

CLOUDSTACK-9408 - remove runtime references to
http://download.cloud.com - Daan Hoogland - Daan Hoogland

Can someone take a look at CLOUDSTACK-9811?

~ Rajani

http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

On March 9, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Tutkowski, Mike
(mike.tutkow...@netapp.com) wrote:

Hi,

Sure, I can pull that code and test.

I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the
middle of trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done,
I can move on to your PR.

Thanks!
Mike

On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez" 
wrote:

Hi Mike,

Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and
created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been
testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please
repeat your
tests on it?

Thanks,
Nicolas

2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike
:

> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
 wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @
nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > This does seem messed up.
> >
> > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag,
the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> > If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places
them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should
either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> > The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it
doesn’t pick up any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> > This data used to be stored in the
cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our
upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to
storage_pool_tags?
> >
> > I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine
it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >
> > No VM snapshot.
> >
> > I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I
> also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> >
> >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"

> wrote:
> >>
> >> I seem to have found another blocker:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" 
wrote:
> >>
> >> PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and
test
> >> results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few
more
> >> bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> ~ Rajani
> >>
> >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >>
> >> On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi (
> raj...@apache.org)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my
> >> previous mail.
> >>
> >> ~ Rajani
> >>
> >> http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >>
> >> On March 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Rohit Yadav
> >> (rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Koushik, I did not realize Kishan had sent this
> already.
> >> Let's get either of the PRs merged and kick a RC2.
> >>
> >> Regards.
> >>
> >> 
> >> From: Koushik Das 
> >> Sent: 03 March 2017 14:14:56
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
> >>
> >> Looks like there is already a PR for the same issue
> >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1982 from Kishan.
> >>
> >> -Koushik
> >>
> >> On 03/03/17, 1:58 PM, "Rohit Yadav" <
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> -1 (binding)
> >>
> >> All, I've found an upgrade blocker. Pre 4.6 users are
required
> >> to seed 4.6 systemvmtemplate to proceed with the upgrade
> >> otherwise upgrade fails, and from 4.9 upgrade to 4.10 does
no
> >> check/enforcement that 4.10 based systemvmtemplate has been
> >> seeded/registered, nor the minimum required
systemvmtemplate
> >> version is changed from 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1870: CLOUDSTACK-9708: Router deployment failed due to two...

[nitin-maharana]

Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1870
  
@remibergsma : Can you please review it again. Fixed the test failures.

ping @jayapalu @rajesh-battala 


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1992: CLOUDSTACK-9824:Resource count for Primary storage i...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1992
  
Trillian test result (tid-935)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 36496 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1992-t935-kvm-centos7.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py
Test completed. 46 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | `Failure` | 867.90 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 368.10 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 329.39 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 0.03 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 159.18 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 66.06 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 250.05 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 285.96 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 523.38 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 519.34 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1403.40 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 547.05 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 156.15 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 156.12 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 161.19 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 156.04 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 155.67 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 150.95 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 156.04 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 94.76 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 706.24 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.20 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 100.93 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 161.72 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 256.94 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.62 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.20 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 30.69 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.63 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.64 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 40.38 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.12 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.08 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.16 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 40.34 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 131.47 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.54 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.49 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.45 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.61 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.54 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.18 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.34 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.09 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.11 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 10.97 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 234.38 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.03 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.08 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.09 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1956: CLOUDSTACK-9796 - Fix NPE in VirtualMachineManagerIm...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956
  
Trillian test result (tid-936)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 32211 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1956-t936-kvm-centos7.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
Test completed. 45 look ok, 3 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | `Failure` | 368.96 
| test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 315.79 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 0.04 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 160.02 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 71.29 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 245.60 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 270.06 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 533.80 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 513.29 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1400.07 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 548.99 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 762.46 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 156.53 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 156.59 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 161.50 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 156.55 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 150.77 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 151.25 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 151.34 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 124.22 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 711.43 | test_volumes.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 252.67 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.67 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.25 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 40.97 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 125.94 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.87 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.18 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.34 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 35.45 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.03 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.06 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.16 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.11 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.13 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 35.40 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 161.70 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.80 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.56 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 103.64 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 161.80 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 193.85 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.20 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.23 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.16 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 11.11 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.64 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.04 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.06 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.11 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.13 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.20 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.32 | test_routers.py
test_08_start_router | Success | 30.30 | test_routers.py
test_07_stop_router | Success | 10.18 | test_routers.py
test_06_router_advanced | Success | 0.06 | test_routers.py

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1707: CLOUDSTACK-9397: Add Watchdog timer to KVM Instance

[cloudmonger]

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1707
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 443
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=104
 Failed=1
 Skipped=7

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_routers.py

 * test_03_restart_network_cleanup Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_nested_virtualization_vmware
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_login.py
test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_routers_network_ops.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1994: CLOUDSTACK-9827: Storage tags stored in multiple pla...

[serg38]

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
  
@nvazquez Should we simply replace storage_tag_view instead of switching 
queries over to another view?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1994: CLOUDSTACK-9827: Storage tags stored in multiple pla...

[serg38]

Github user serg38 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
  
@mike-tutkowski @karuturi @koushik-das @rafaelweingartner  Please review 
the fix for 4.10 blocker


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Hi,

Sure, I can pull that code and test.

I might have to wait until tomorrow, though, because I’m in the middle of 
trying to reproduce CLOUDSTACK-9823. Once that is done, I can move on to your 
PR.

Thanks!
Mike

On 3/8/17, 1:45 PM, "Nicolas Vazquez"  wrote:

Hi Mike,

Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please repeat your
tests on it?

Thanks,
Nicolas

2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike :

> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 
> wrote:
> >
> >This does seem messed up.
> >
> >If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> >If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> >On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 
> wrote:
> >
> >I believe I have found another bug (one that we should either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> >It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> >The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it doesn’t pick up 
any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> >This data used to be stored in the cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to storage_pool_tags?
> >
> >I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> >On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >
> >No VM snapshot.
> >
> >I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I
> also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> >
> >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>   I seem to have found another blocker:
> >>
> >>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
> >>
> >>   On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:
> >>
> >>   PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and test
> >>   results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few 
more
> >>   bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday)
> >>
> >>   Thanks,
> >>
> >>   ~ Rajani
> >>
> >>   http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >>
> >>   On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi (
> raj...@apache.org)
> >>   wrote:
> >>
> >>   I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my
> >>   previous mail.
> >>
> >>   ~ Rajani
> >>
> >>   http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >>
> >>   On March 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Rohit Yadav
> >>   (rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
> >>
> >>   Thanks Koushik, I did not realize Kishan had sent this
> already.
> >>   Let's get either of the PRs merged and kick a RC2.
> >>
> >>   Regards.
> >>
> >>   
> >>   From: Koushik Das 
> >>   Sent: 03 March 2017 14:14:56
> >>   To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>   Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
> >>
> >>   Looks like there is already a PR for the same issue
> >>   https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1982 from Kishan.
> >>
> >>   -Koushik
> >>
> >>   On 03/03/17, 1:58 PM, "Rohit Yadav" <

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

[Tutkowski, Mike]

I went ahead and resolved/closed CLOUDSTACK-9822 just now.

I am still investigating if CLOUDSTACK-9823 is an issue.

Thanks!

On 3/8/17, 2:41 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

Thanks! I got the system VM up and running again on XenServer.

On 3/8/17, 12:40 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy"  
wrote:

1. I think PR1991 that was merged today will resolve it
2. What are your settings for hypervisor.list and 
system.vm.default.hypervisor  ? In some settings disabling cluster doesn’t have 
an intended affect. You might try unmanage your vmware cluster and re-try. I 
think one of the settings above can control where your router will end up.

Thanks,
Sergey


On 3/8/17, 11:30 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  
wrote:

Great – thanks!

While trying to get my system VMs patched, I came across two issues 
(I'll note them here because maybe you are already aware of them if you work 
with VMware in CloudStack frequently):

1) In a basic zone, I cannot get the virtual router to transition 
from the Starting state to the Running state on VMware. This works on XenServer 
for me.

2) I actually had planned on running the virtual router on 
XenServer instead of on VMware (to simplify what I was working on so that the 
system VMs would be running elsewhere and I could just have my user VMs easily 
visible). I disabled my VMware cluster and then spun up a user VM on my 
XenServer cluster so that CloudStack would spin up a virtual router. Since I 
only had one cluster enabled, I expected the virtual router to end up there, 
but it ended up on my disabled VMware cluster.

I can open tickets for these, but I figured I would run them past 
you first.

Thanks!

> On Mar 8, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Sergey Levitskiy 
 wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Mike. BTW issue with storage tags will be  addressed 
shortly 
> 
> On 3/8/17, 12:24 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 
 wrote:
> 
>OK, I have an update to report.
> 
>I think we can close out both of these tickets as non issues.
> 
>It appears I had inadvertently left in one modified file (I 
was playing around with fixing a bug for 4.11) in my code for RC1 (I’m using 
source, not a pre-built binary to test RC1). While I was waiting for something 
else to be fixed in RC1, I had made a few code changes in one file to test out 
an idea I had for a bug fix to go into 4.11. I had forgotten about this changed 
file and the bug fix wasn’t complete, so it looks like this caused both 9822 
and 9823.
> 
>I’d like to do more testing later (it’s about 1:30 AM here, so 
I’m starting to get a bit tired), but I can close those tickets out if my 
testing works out as expected.
> 
>On 3/7/17, 5:30 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 
 wrote:
> 
>Hi,
> 
>I tried the following with both an NFS datastore and a 
VMFS datastore.
> 
>A new CloudStack environment running under RC1 with VMware 
places a ROOT-x-01.vmdk file in the VM’s folder for its root disk.
> 
>However, in my new, clean environment, I cannot reproduce 
either of those issues I logged.
> 
>I’m not sure how I got the system into whatever state it 
was in before, but a fresh install works.
> 
>Let’s hold off on having anyone look into those tickets. I 
can play around with this more over the coming days and see if I can reproduce 
either or both issues.
> 
>Thanks,
>Mike
> 
>On 3/7/17, 9:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 
 wrote:
> 
>I believe the VM was deployed that way.
> 
>I know that suffix typically only shows up when VM 
snapshots are involved, but let me rebuild my environment and try to reproduce 
it from scratch.
> 
>> On Mar 7, 2017, at 8:17 AM, Sergey Levitskiy 
 wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Changing the subject to start a new thread.
>> It would be helpful to figure out when your volume obtained 
1 suffix in DB.
>> I believe it is supposed to happen only when VMsnapohsot is 
created. Was snapshotting part of your tests? If os was VM running or stopped?
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/7/17, 7:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Thanks! I got the system VM up and running again on XenServer.

On 3/8/17, 12:40 PM, "Sergey Levitskiy"  wrote:

1. I think PR1991 that was merged today will resolve it
2. What are your settings for hypervisor.list and 
system.vm.default.hypervisor  ? In some settings disabling cluster doesn’t have 
an intended affect. You might try unmanage your vmware cluster and re-try. I 
think one of the settings above can control where your router will end up.

Thanks,
Sergey


On 3/8/17, 11:30 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

Great – thanks!

While trying to get my system VMs patched, I came across two issues 
(I'll note them here because maybe you are already aware of them if you work 
with VMware in CloudStack frequently):

1) In a basic zone, I cannot get the virtual router to transition from 
the Starting state to the Running state on VMware. This works on XenServer for 
me.

2) I actually had planned on running the virtual router on XenServer 
instead of on VMware (to simplify what I was working on so that the system VMs 
would be running elsewhere and I could just have my user VMs easily visible). I 
disabled my VMware cluster and then spun up a user VM on my XenServer cluster 
so that CloudStack would spin up a virtual router. Since I only had one cluster 
enabled, I expected the virtual router to end up there, but it ended up on my 
disabled VMware cluster.

I can open tickets for these, but I figured I would run them past you 
first.

Thanks!

> On Mar 8, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Sergey Levitskiy 
 wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Mike. BTW issue with storage tags will be  addressed shortly 
> 
> On 3/8/17, 12:24 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  
wrote:
> 
>OK, I have an update to report.
> 
>I think we can close out both of these tickets as non issues.
> 
>It appears I had inadvertently left in one modified file (I was 
playing around with fixing a bug for 4.11) in my code for RC1 (I’m using 
source, not a pre-built binary to test RC1). While I was waiting for something 
else to be fixed in RC1, I had made a few code changes in one file to test out 
an idea I had for a bug fix to go into 4.11. I had forgotten about this changed 
file and the bug fix wasn’t complete, so it looks like this caused both 9822 
and 9823.
> 
>I’d like to do more testing later (it’s about 1:30 AM here, so I’m 
starting to get a bit tired), but I can close those tickets out if my testing 
works out as expected.
> 
>On 3/7/17, 5:30 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  
wrote:
> 
>Hi,
> 
>I tried the following with both an NFS datastore and a VMFS 
datastore.
> 
>A new CloudStack environment running under RC1 with VMware 
places a ROOT-x-01.vmdk file in the VM’s folder for its root disk.
> 
>However, in my new, clean environment, I cannot reproduce 
either of those issues I logged.
> 
>I’m not sure how I got the system into whatever state it was 
in before, but a fresh install works.
> 
>Let’s hold off on having anyone look into those tickets. I can 
play around with this more over the coming days and see if I can reproduce 
either or both issues.
> 
>Thanks,
>Mike
> 
>On 3/7/17, 9:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 
 wrote:
> 
>I believe the VM was deployed that way.
> 
>I know that suffix typically only shows up when VM 
snapshots are involved, but let me rebuild my environment and try to reproduce 
it from scratch.
> 
>> On Mar 7, 2017, at 8:17 AM, Sergey Levitskiy 
 wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Changing the subject to start a new thread.
>> It would be helpful to figure out when your volume obtained 1 
suffix in DB.
>> I believe it is supposed to happen only when VMsnapohsot is created. 
Was snapshotting part of your tests? If os was VM running or stopped?
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/7/17, 7:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  
wrote:
>> 
>>   No VM snapshot.
>> 
>>   I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I also 
tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
>> 
>>> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy 
 wrote:
>>> 
>>> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
>>> 
>>> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  
wrote:

Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0

[Nicolas Vazquez]

Hi Mike,

Thanks for reporting this issue! We've been working on it and created this
PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994. We've been testing it
and seems to be solving the issues reported, can you please repeat your
tests on it?

Thanks,
Nicolas

2017-03-07 21:52 GMT-03:00 Tutkowski, Mike :

> Here’s the ticket:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827
>
> On 3/7/17, 1:51 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:
>
> Yes, I can open a ticket.
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yes that’s the bug. Can you open a ticket for this? @ nvazquez can
> you take a look?
> >
> > On 3/7/17, 12:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 
> wrote:
> >
> >This does seem messed up.
> >
> >If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, the tag
> ends up in storage_pool_details.
> >
> >If I edit an existing storage pool’s storage tags, it places them
> in storage_pool_tags.
> >
> >On 3/7/17, 1:39 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 
> wrote:
> >
> >I believe I have found another bug (one that we should either
> fix or examine in detail before releasing 4.10).
> >
> >It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags.
> >
> >The addition of this table seems to have broken the
> listStorageTags API command. When this command runs, it doesn’t pick up any
> storage tags for me (and I know I have one storage tag).
> >
> >This data used to be stored in the cloud.storage_pool_details
> table. It’s good to put it in its own table, but will our upgrade process
> move the existing tags from storage_pool_details to storage_pool_tags?
> >
> >I have not yet opened a ticket for this. I want to examine it
> a bit more before doing so.
> >
> >On 3/7/17, 8:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <
> mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> wrote:
> >
> >No VM snapshot.
> >
> >I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I
> also tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> >
> >> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy <
> sergey.levits...@autodesk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
> >>
> >> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>   I seem to have found another blocker:
> >>
> >>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
> >>
> >>   On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:
> >>
> >>   PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and test
> >>   results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few more
> >>   bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday)
> >>
> >>   Thanks,
> >>
> >>   ~ Rajani
> >>
> >>   http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >>
> >>   On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi (
> raj...@apache.org)
> >>   wrote:
> >>
> >>   I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my
> >>   previous mail.
> >>
> >>   ~ Rajani
> >>
> >>   http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> >>
> >>   On March 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Rohit Yadav
> >>   (rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
> >>
> >>   Thanks Koushik, I did not realize Kishan had sent this
> already.
> >>   Let's get either of the PRs merged and kick a RC2.
> >>
> >>   Regards.
> >>
> >>   
> >>   From: Koushik Das 
> >>   Sent: 03 March 2017 14:14:56
> >>   To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>   Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
> >>
> >>   Looks like there is already a PR for the same issue
> >>   https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1982 from Kishan.
> >>
> >>   -Koushik
> >>
> >>   On 03/03/17, 1:58 PM, "Rohit Yadav" <
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
> >>   wrote:
> >>
> >>   -1 (binding)
> >>
> >>   All, I've found an upgrade blocker. Pre 4.6 users are required
> >>   to seed 4.6 systemvmtemplate to proceed with the upgrade
> >>   otherwise upgrade fails, and from 4.9 upgrade to 4.10 does no
> >>   check/enforcement that 4.10 based systemvmtemplate has been
> >>   seeded/registered, nor the minimum required systemvmtemplate
> >>   version is changed from 4.6.0 to 4.10.0.
> >>
> >>   After we have merged the strongswan/java8 PR, I had updated
> the
> >>   upgrade docs on how to upgrade the systemvmtemplate here:
> >>
> >>   http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-
> 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1988: WIP: CLOUDSTACK-9815 intergration of ApplicationClus...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1988
  
@DaanHoogland a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1988: WIP: CLOUDSTACK-9815 intergration of ApplicationClus...

[DaanHoogland]

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1988
  
@ustcweizhou of course. It is still work in progress but all changes needed 
will be added in time.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1988: WIP: CLOUDSTACK-9815 intergration of ApplicationClus...

[DaanHoogland]

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1988
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1994: CLOUDSTACK-9827: Storage tags stored in multi...

[nvazquez]

GitHub user nvazquez opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994

CLOUDSTACK-9827: Storage tags stored in multiple places

Issue description: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827

### Fixes
- Create Primary Storage: Persist tags into `storage_pool_tags` instead of 
`storage_pool_details`
- List Storage Tags: Queries `storage_pool_tags` table instead of 
`storage_tag_view`

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/nvazquez/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9827

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #1994


commit e106919443949f704d77cee3dde7b36100609a73
Author: nvazquez 
Date:   2017-03-08T18:19:55Z

CLOUDSTACK-9827: Storage tags stored in multiple places




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1988: WIP: CLOUDSTACK-9815 intergration of ApplicationClus...

[ustcweizhou]

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1988
  
awesome

@DaanHoogland  could you upload /etc/cloudstack/management/k8s-master.yml 
and /etc/cloudstack/management/k8s-node.yml as well ?

For the license on top of some files, will you change it ?



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1988: WIP: CLOUDSTACK-9815 intergration of ApplicationClus...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1988
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-574


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1988: WIP: CLOUDSTACK-9815 intergration of ApplicationClus...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1988
  
@DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1988: WIP: CLOUDSTACK-9815 intergration of ApplicationClus...

[DaanHoogland]

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1988
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

[Sergey Levitskiy]

1. I think PR1991 that was merged today will resolve it
2. What are your settings for hypervisor.list and system.vm.default.hypervisor  
? In some settings disabling cluster doesn’t have an intended affect. You might 
try unmanage your vmware cluster and re-try. I think one of the settings above 
can control where your router will end up.

Thanks,
Sergey


On 3/8/17, 11:30 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

Great – thanks!

While trying to get my system VMs patched, I came across two issues (I'll 
note them here because maybe you are already aware of them if you work with 
VMware in CloudStack frequently):

1) In a basic zone, I cannot get the virtual router to transition from the 
Starting state to the Running state on VMware. This works on XenServer for me.

2) I actually had planned on running the virtual router on XenServer 
instead of on VMware (to simplify what I was working on so that the system VMs 
would be running elsewhere and I could just have my user VMs easily visible). I 
disabled my VMware cluster and then spun up a user VM on my XenServer cluster 
so that CloudStack would spin up a virtual router. Since I only had one cluster 
enabled, I expected the virtual router to end up there, but it ended up on my 
disabled VMware cluster.

I can open tickets for these, but I figured I would run them past you first.

Thanks!

> On Mar 8, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Sergey Levitskiy 
 wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Mike. BTW issue with storage tags will be  addressed shortly 
> 
> On 3/8/17, 12:24 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:
> 
>OK, I have an update to report.
> 
>I think we can close out both of these tickets as non issues.
> 
>It appears I had inadvertently left in one modified file (I was 
playing around with fixing a bug for 4.11) in my code for RC1 (I’m using 
source, not a pre-built binary to test RC1). While I was waiting for something 
else to be fixed in RC1, I had made a few code changes in one file to test out 
an idea I had for a bug fix to go into 4.11. I had forgotten about this changed 
file and the bug fix wasn’t complete, so it looks like this caused both 9822 
and 9823.
> 
>I’d like to do more testing later (it’s about 1:30 AM here, so I’m 
starting to get a bit tired), but I can close those tickets out if my testing 
works out as expected.
> 
>On 3/7/17, 5:30 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  
wrote:
> 
>Hi,
> 
>I tried the following with both an NFS datastore and a VMFS 
datastore.
> 
>A new CloudStack environment running under RC1 with VMware places 
a ROOT-x-01.vmdk file in the VM’s folder for its root disk.
> 
>However, in my new, clean environment, I cannot reproduce either 
of those issues I logged.
> 
>I’m not sure how I got the system into whatever state it was in 
before, but a fresh install works.
> 
>Let’s hold off on having anyone look into those tickets. I can 
play around with this more over the coming days and see if I can reproduce 
either or both issues.
> 
>Thanks,
>Mike
> 
>On 3/7/17, 9:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  
wrote:
> 
>I believe the VM was deployed that way.
> 
>I know that suffix typically only shows up when VM snapshots 
are involved, but let me rebuild my environment and try to reproduce it from 
scratch.
> 
>> On Mar 7, 2017, at 8:17 AM, Sergey Levitskiy 
 wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Changing the subject to start a new thread.
>> It would be helpful to figure out when your volume obtained 1 suffix 
in DB.
>> I believe it is supposed to happen only when VMsnapohsot is created. Was 
snapshotting part of your tests? If os was VM running or stopped?
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/7/17, 7:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:
>> 
>>   No VM snapshot.
>> 
>>   I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I also tried in 
the Stopped state. Same results.
>> 
>>> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy 
 wrote:
>>> 
>>> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
>>> 
>>> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  
wrote:
>>> 
>>>  I seem to have found another blocker:
>>> 
>>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
>>> 
>>>  On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:
>>> 
>>>  PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and test
>>>  results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few more
>>>  bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday)
>>> 

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

[Tutkowski, Mike]

Great – thanks!

While trying to get my system VMs patched, I came across two issues (I'll note 
them here because maybe you are already aware of them if you work with VMware 
in CloudStack frequently):

1) In a basic zone, I cannot get the virtual router to transition from the 
Starting state to the Running state on VMware. This works on XenServer for me.

2) I actually had planned on running the virtual router on XenServer instead of 
on VMware (to simplify what I was working on so that the system VMs would be 
running elsewhere and I could just have my user VMs easily visible). I disabled 
my VMware cluster and then spun up a user VM on my XenServer cluster so that 
CloudStack would spin up a virtual router. Since I only had one cluster 
enabled, I expected the virtual router to end up there, but it ended up on my 
disabled VMware cluster.

I can open tickets for these, but I figured I would run them past you first.

Thanks!

> On Mar 8, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Sergey Levitskiy  
> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Mike. BTW issue with storage tags will be  addressed shortly 
> 
> On 3/8/17, 12:24 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:
> 
>OK, I have an update to report.
> 
>I think we can close out both of these tickets as non issues.
> 
>It appears I had inadvertently left in one modified file (I was playing 
> around with fixing a bug for 4.11) in my code for RC1 (I’m using source, not 
> a pre-built binary to test RC1). While I was waiting for something else to be 
> fixed in RC1, I had made a few code changes in one file to test out an idea I 
> had for a bug fix to go into 4.11. I had forgotten about this changed file 
> and the bug fix wasn’t complete, so it looks like this caused both 9822 and 
> 9823.
> 
>I’d like to do more testing later (it’s about 1:30 AM here, so I’m 
> starting to get a bit tired), but I can close those tickets out if my testing 
> works out as expected.
> 
>On 3/7/17, 5:30 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:
> 
>Hi,
> 
>I tried the following with both an NFS datastore and a VMFS datastore.
> 
>A new CloudStack environment running under RC1 with VMware places a 
> ROOT-x-01.vmdk file in the VM’s folder for its root disk.
> 
>However, in my new, clean environment, I cannot reproduce either of 
> those issues I logged.
> 
>I’m not sure how I got the system into whatever state it was in 
> before, but a fresh install works.
> 
>Let’s hold off on having anyone look into those tickets. I can play 
> around with this more over the coming days and see if I can reproduce either 
> or both issues.
> 
>Thanks,
>Mike
> 
>On 3/7/17, 9:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  
> wrote:
> 
>I believe the VM was deployed that way.
> 
>I know that suffix typically only shows up when VM snapshots are 
> involved, but let me rebuild my environment and try to reproduce it from 
> scratch.
> 
>> On Mar 7, 2017, at 8:17 AM, Sergey Levitskiy  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Changing the subject to start a new thread.
>> It would be helpful to figure out when your volume obtained 1 suffix in 
>> DB.
>> I believe it is supposed to happen only when VMsnapohsot is created. Was 
>> snapshotting part of your tests? If os was VM running or stopped?
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/7/17, 7:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:
>> 
>>   No VM snapshot.
>> 
>>   I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I also tried in the 
>> Stopped state. Same results.
>> 
>>> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
>>> 
>>> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:
>>> 
>>>  I seem to have found another blocker:
>>> 
>>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
>>> 
>>>  On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:
>>> 
>>>  PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and test
>>>  results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few more
>>>  bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday)
>>> 
>>>  Thanks,
>>> 
>>>  ~ Rajani
>>> 
>>>  http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>>> 
>>>  On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi (raj...@apache.org)
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>  I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my
>>>  previous mail.
>>> 
>>>  ~ Rajani
>>> 
>>>  http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>>> 
>>>  On March 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Rohit Yadav
>>>  (rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
>>> 
>>>  Thanks Koushik, I did not realize Kishan had sent this already.
>>>  Let's get either of the PRs merged and kick a RC2.
>>> 
>>>  Regards.
>>> 
>>>  
>>>  From: Koushik Das 

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

[Sergey Levitskiy]

Thanks, Mike. BTW issue with storage tags will be  addressed shortly 

On 3/8/17, 12:24 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

OK, I have an update to report.

I think we can close out both of these tickets as non issues.

It appears I had inadvertently left in one modified file (I was playing 
around with fixing a bug for 4.11) in my code for RC1 (I’m using source, not a 
pre-built binary to test RC1). While I was waiting for something else to be 
fixed in RC1, I had made a few code changes in one file to test out an idea I 
had for a bug fix to go into 4.11. I had forgotten about this changed file and 
the bug fix wasn’t complete, so it looks like this caused both 9822 and 9823.

I’d like to do more testing later (it’s about 1:30 AM here, so I’m starting 
to get a bit tired), but I can close those tickets out if my testing works out 
as expected.

On 3/7/17, 5:30 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

Hi,

I tried the following with both an NFS datastore and a VMFS datastore.

A new CloudStack environment running under RC1 with VMware places a 
ROOT-x-01.vmdk file in the VM’s folder for its root disk.

However, in my new, clean environment, I cannot reproduce either of 
those issues I logged.

I’m not sure how I got the system into whatever state it was in before, 
but a fresh install works.

Let’s hold off on having anyone look into those tickets. I can play 
around with this more over the coming days and see if I can reproduce either or 
both issues.

Thanks,
Mike

On 3/7/17, 9:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

I believe the VM was deployed that way.

I know that suffix typically only shows up when VM snapshots are 
involved, but let me rebuild my environment and try to reproduce it from 
scratch.

> On Mar 7, 2017, at 8:17 AM, Sergey Levitskiy 
 wrote:
> 
> 
> Changing the subject to start a new thread.
> It would be helpful to figure out when your volume obtained 1 
suffix in DB.
> I believe it is supposed to happen only when VMsnapohsot is 
created. Was snapshotting part of your tests? If os was VM running or stopped?
> 
> 
> On 3/7/17, 7:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  
wrote:
> 
>No VM snapshot.
> 
>I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I also 
tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> 
>> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy 
 wrote:
>> 
>> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
>> 
>> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" 
 wrote:
>> 
>>   I seem to have found another blocker:
>> 
>>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
>> 
>>   On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi"  
wrote:
>> 
>>   PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and 
test
>>   results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few 
more
>>   bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday)
>> 
>>   Thanks,
>> 
>>   ~ Rajani
>> 
>>   http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>> 
>>   On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi 
(raj...@apache.org)
>>   wrote:
>> 
>>   I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my
>>   previous mail.
>> 
>>   ~ Rajani
>> 
>>   http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>> 
>>   On March 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Rohit Yadav
>>   (rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
>> 
>>   Thanks Koushik, I did not realize Kishan had sent this 
already.
>>   Let's get either of the PRs merged and kick a RC2.
>> 
>>   Regards.
>> 
>>   
>>   From: Koushik Das 
>>   Sent: 03 March 2017 14:14:56
>>   To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>   Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
>> 
>>   Looks like there is already a PR for the same issue
>>   https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1982 from Kishan.
>> 
>> 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1686: CLOUDSTACK-9507: ListVM response's guest_os id shoul...

[cloudmonger]

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1686
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 442
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=104
 Failed=1
 Skipped=7

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_routers_network_ops.py

 * test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_nested_virtualization_vmware
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_login.py
test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1955: CLOUDSTACK-8239 Add VirtIO SCSI support for KVM host...

[nathanejohnson]

Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955
  
@borisstoyanov Whenever you get a second could you kick off a blue 
orangutan smoke test?  I believe I have fixed the issue with ssh'ing into the 
KVM hosts, I sue the IP now instead of hostname.




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1989: WIP: support for multidisk OVA files

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1989
  
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-573


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1989: WIP: support for multidisk OVA files

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1989
  
@abhinandanprateek a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll 
keep you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1989: WIP: support for multidisk OVA files

[abhinandanprateek]

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1989
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1993: Fail to deploy VM instance when use.system.public.ip...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1993
  
Trillian test result (tid-934)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 30630 seconds
Marvin logs: 
https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr1993-t934-kvm-centos7.zip
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_deploy_vm_iso.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py
Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_snapshots.py
Test completed. 47 look ok, 2 have error(s)


Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File
--- | --- | --- | ---
test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 333.92 | 
test_privategw_acl.py
test_02_list_snapshots_with_removed_data_store | `Error` | 0.02 | 
test_snapshots.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 160.88 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_vpc_remote_access_vpn | Success | 65.73 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_01_redundant_vpc_site2site_vpn | Success | 244.92 | test_vpc_vpn.py
test_02_VPC_default_routes | Success | 273.72 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_01_VPC_nics_after_destroy | Success | 531.15 | test_vpc_router_nics.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers | Success | 509.38 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | Success | 1413.14 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers | 
Success | 537.13 | test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes | Success | 749.15 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL | Success | 1284.41 | 
test_vpc_redundant.py
test_09_delete_detached_volume | Success | 156.18 | test_volumes.py
test_08_resize_volume | Success | 156.27 | test_volumes.py
test_07_resize_fail | Success | 161.42 | test_volumes.py
test_06_download_detached_volume | Success | 156.50 | test_volumes.py
test_05_detach_volume | Success | 150.54 | test_volumes.py
test_04_delete_attached_volume | Success | 151.13 | test_volumes.py
test_03_download_attached_volume | Success | 155.93 | test_volumes.py
test_02_attach_volume | Success | 124.00 | test_volumes.py
test_01_create_volume | Success | 710.90 | test_volumes.py
test_03_delete_vm_snapshots | Success | 275.25 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_02_revert_vm_snapshots | Success | 95.61 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_01_create_vm_snapshots | Success | 159.68 | test_vm_snapshots.py
test_deploy_vm_multiple | Success | 287.26 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_deploy_vm | Success | 0.02 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Success | 0.03 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_10_attachAndDetach_iso | Success | 26.44 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_09_expunge_vm | Success | 125.14 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_08_migrate_vm | Success | 30.56 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_07_restore_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_06_destroy_vm | Success | 130.95 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_03_reboot_vm | Success | 125.66 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_02_start_vm | Success | 10.12 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_01_stop_vm | Success | 40.23 | test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_CreateTemplateWithDuplicateName | Success | 30.27 | test_templates.py
test_08_list_system_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_07_list_public_templates | Success | 0.02 | test_templates.py
test_05_template_permissions | Success | 0.04 | test_templates.py
test_04_extract_template | Success | 5.10 | test_templates.py
test_03_delete_template | Success | 5.07 | test_templates.py
test_02_edit_template | Success | 90.09 | test_templates.py
test_01_create_template | Success | 20.21 | test_templates.py
test_10_destroy_cpvm | Success | 131.40 | test_ssvm.py
test_09_destroy_ssvm | Success | 163.32 | test_ssvm.py
test_08_reboot_cpvm | Success | 101.32 | test_ssvm.py
test_07_reboot_ssvm | Success | 133.49 | test_ssvm.py
test_06_stop_cpvm | Success | 131.50 | test_ssvm.py
test_05_stop_ssvm | Success | 133.37 | test_ssvm.py
test_04_cpvm_internals | Success | 1.13 | test_ssvm.py
test_03_ssvm_internals | Success | 3.36 | test_ssvm.py
test_02_list_cpvm_vm | Success | 0.07 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_list_sec_storage_vm | Success | 0.08 | test_ssvm.py
test_01_snapshot_root_disk | Success | 10.88 | test_snapshots.py
test_04_change_offering_small | Success | 239.35 | test_service_offerings.py
test_03_delete_service_offering | Success | 0.02 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_edit_service_offering | Success | 0.03 | test_service_offerings.py
test_01_create_service_offering | Success | 0.07 | test_service_offerings.py
test_02_sys_template_ready | Success | 0.08 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_01_sys_vm_start | Success | 0.12 | test_secondary_storage.py
test_09_reboot_router | Success | 35.21 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1956: CLOUDSTACK-9796 - Fix NPE in VirtualMachineManagerIm...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956
  
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1956: CLOUDSTACK-9796 - Fix NPE in VirtualMachineManagerIm...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1956: CLOUDSTACK-9796 - Fix NPE in VirtualMachineManagerIm...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-572


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1992: CLOUDSTACK-9824:Resource count for Primary storage i...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1992
  
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1992: CLOUDSTACK-9824:Resource count for Primary storage i...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1992
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1956: CLOUDSTACK-9796 - Fix NPE in VirtualMachineManagerIm...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1956: CLOUDSTACK-9796 - Fix NPE in VirtualMachineManagerIm...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1956: CLOUDSTACK-9796 - Fix NPE in VirtualMachineManagerIm...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956
  
Packaging result: ✖centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-571


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1992: CLOUDSTACK-9824:Resource count for Primary storage i...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1992
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-570


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1956: CLOUDSTACK-9796 - Fix NPE in VirtualMachineManagerIm...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1956: CLOUDSTACK-9796 - Fix NPE in VirtualMachineManagerIm...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1956
  
@nathanejohnson thanks for this bug fix 
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1992: CLOUDSTACK-9824:Resource count for Primary storage i...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1992
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1992: CLOUDSTACK-9824:Resource count for Primary storage i...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1992
  
Thanks for this fix @PranaliM 
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1771: CLOUDSTACK-9611: Dedicating a Guest VLAN range to Pr...

[nitin-maharana]

Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771
  
tag:mergeready


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1771: CLOUDSTACK-9611: Dedicating a Guest VLAN range to Pr...

[ustcweizhou]

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771
  
@nitin-maharana yes, you are right. I forgot it. 
LGTM


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #827: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-8849: Usage job should stop usage ...

[ustcweizhou]

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/827
  
@yvsubhash Sorry I still disagree with it.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1991: CLOUDSTACK-9821: Fixed issue in deploying vm in basi...

[cloudmonger]

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1991
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 441
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=101
 Failed=4
 Skipped=7

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_non_contigiousvlan.py

 * test_extendPhysicalNetworkVlan Failed

* test_volumes.py

 * test_06_download_detached_volume Failed

* test_routers_network_ops.py

 * test_01_isolate_network_FW_PF_default_routes_egress_true Failed

 * test_03_RVR_Network_check_router_state Failing since 2 runs


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_nested_virtualization_vmware
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_login.py
test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1989: WIP: support for multidisk OVA files

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1989
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-569


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1989: WIP: support for multidisk OVA files

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1989
  
@abhinandanprateek a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll 
keep you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1989: WIP: support for multidisk OVA files

[abhinandanprateek]

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1989
  
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1771: CLOUDSTACK-9611: Dedicating a Guest VLAN rang...

[nitin-maharana]

Github user nitin-maharana commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771#discussion_r104902049
  
--- Diff: ui/scripts/system.js ---
@@ -2090,27 +2090,57 @@
 fields: {
 vlanrange: {
 label: 
'label.vlan.vni.range',
-/*  select: 
function(args) {
-var items = [];
-
if(args.context.physicalNetworks[0].vlan != null && 
args.context.physicalNetworks[0].vlan.length > 0) {
-var vlanranges = 
args.context.physicalNetworks[0].vlan.split(";");
-for(var i = 0; i < 
vlanranges.length ; i++) {
-items.push({id: 
vlanranges[i], description: vlanranges[i]});
-}
-}
-
args.response.success({data: items});
-},*/
 validation: {
 required: true
 }
 },
-account: {
-label: 
'label.account',
-validation: {
-required: true
+scope: {
+label: 
'label.scope',
+docID: 
'helpGuestNetworkZoneScope',
+select: 
function(args) {
+var array1 = 
[];
+
+array1.push({
+id: 
'account-specific',
+
description: 'label.account'
+});
+array1.push({
+id: 
'project-specific',
+
description: 'label.project'
+});
+
+
args.response.success({
+data: 
array1
+});
+
+
args.$select.change(function() {
+var $form 
= $(this).closest('form');
+
+if 
($(this).val() == "account-specific") {
+
$form.find('.form-item[rel=domainId]').css('display', 'inline-block');
+
$form.find('.form-item[rel=account]').css('display', 'inline-block');
+
$form.find('.form-item[rel=projectId]').hide();
+} else if 
($(this).val() == "project-specific") {
+
$form.find('.form-item[rel=domainId]').css('display', 'inline-block');
+
$form.find('.form-item[rel=account]').hide();
+
$form.find('.form-item[rel=projectId]').css('display', 'inline-block');
+}
+
+if 
(args.context.projects != null && args.context.projects.length > 0) {
+
$form.find('.form-item[rel=domainId]').hide();
+  

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1771: CLOUDSTACK-9611: Dedicating a Guest VLAN range to Pr...

[nitin-maharana]

Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771
  
@ustcweizhou : In case of project view, the projectId is always passed. 
Also we consider it as project scope but we won't have any option to choose 
projects from a list because we are already under a project.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #827: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-8849: Usage job should stop usage ...

[yvsubhash]

Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/827
  
@ustcweizhou Do you still have some queries on it?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1991: CLOUDSTACK-9821: Fixed issue in deploying vm ...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1991


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1991: CLOUDSTACK-9821: Fixed issue in deploying vm in basi...

[karuturi]

Github user karuturi commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1991
  
I manually verified this. merging this now.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1982: CLOUDSTACK-9807/CLOUDSTACK-9808 - Added upgra...

[asfgit]

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1982


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1850: CLOUDSTACK-9694: Unable to limit the Public IPs in V...

[sudhansu7]

Github user sudhansu7 commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1850
  
@koushik-das 
Added marvin test. Please review.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1982: CLOUDSTACK-9807/CLOUDSTACK-9808 - Added upgrade chan...

[rhtyd]

Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1982
  
LGTM, @karuturi let's merge this?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1993: Fail to deploy VM instance when use.system.public.ip...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1993
  
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has 
been kicked to run smoke tests


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1993: Fail to deploy VM instance when use.system.public.ip...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1993
  
@blueorangutan test


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1993: Fail to deploy VM instance when use.system.public.ip...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1993
  
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-568


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: CLOUDSTACK-9822

[Tutkowski, Mike]

OK, I have an update to report.

I think we can close out both of these tickets as non issues.

It appears I had inadvertently left in one modified file (I was playing around 
with fixing a bug for 4.11) in my code for RC1 (I’m using source, not a 
pre-built binary to test RC1). While I was waiting for something else to be 
fixed in RC1, I had made a few code changes in one file to test out an idea I 
had for a bug fix to go into 4.11. I had forgotten about this changed file and 
the bug fix wasn’t complete, so it looks like this caused both 9822 and 9823.

I’d like to do more testing later (it’s about 1:30 AM here, so I’m starting to 
get a bit tired), but I can close those tickets out if my testing works out as 
expected.

On 3/7/17, 5:30 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

Hi,

I tried the following with both an NFS datastore and a VMFS datastore.

A new CloudStack environment running under RC1 with VMware places a 
ROOT-x-01.vmdk file in the VM’s folder for its root disk.

However, in my new, clean environment, I cannot reproduce either of those 
issues I logged.

I’m not sure how I got the system into whatever state it was in before, but 
a fresh install works.

Let’s hold off on having anyone look into those tickets. I can play around 
with this more over the coming days and see if I can reproduce either or both 
issues.

Thanks,
Mike

On 3/7/17, 9:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  wrote:

I believe the VM was deployed that way.

I know that suffix typically only shows up when VM snapshots are 
involved, but let me rebuild my environment and try to reproduce it from 
scratch.

> On Mar 7, 2017, at 8:17 AM, Sergey Levitskiy 
 wrote:
> 
> 
> Changing the subject to start a new thread.
> It would be helpful to figure out when your volume obtained 1 
suffix in DB.
> I believe it is supposed to happen only when VMsnapohsot is created. 
Was snapshotting part of your tests? If os was VM running or stopped?
> 
> 
> On 3/7/17, 7:10 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  
wrote:
> 
>No VM snapshot.
> 
>I tried while the VM was in the Running state and then I also 
tried in the Stopped state. Same results.
> 
>> On Mar 7, 2017, at 7:54 AM, Sergey Levitskiy 
 wrote:
>> 
>> Is VM has an VMsnaphsot? Is VM in Stopped state?
>> 
>> On 3/6/17, 10:32 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"  
wrote:
>> 
>>   I seem to have found another blocker:
>> 
>>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9822
>> 
>>   On 3/6/17, 9:51 PM, "Rajani Karuturi"  wrote:
>> 
>>   PRs are ready for the blockers. Waiting for reviews and test
>>   results. Once they are ready, I will merge them(and a few more
>>   bug fixes) and create RC2 (probably tomorrow, Wednesday)
>> 
>>   Thanks,
>> 
>>   ~ Rajani
>> 
>>   http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>> 
>>   On March 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rajani Karuturi 
(raj...@apache.org)
>>   wrote:
>> 
>>   I will create RC2 on Monday with the fixes mentioned in my
>>   previous mail.
>> 
>>   ~ Rajani
>> 
>>   http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
>> 
>>   On March 3, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Rohit Yadav
>>   (rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com) wrote:
>> 
>>   Thanks Koushik, I did not realize Kishan had sent this already.
>>   Let's get either of the PRs merged and kick a RC2.
>> 
>>   Regards.
>> 
>>   
>>   From: Koushik Das 
>>   Sent: 03 March 2017 14:14:56
>>   To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>   Subject: Re: :[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0
>> 
>>   Looks like there is already a PR for the same issue
>>   https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1982 from Kishan.
>> 
>>   -Koushik
>> 
>>   On 03/03/17, 1:58 PM, "Rohit Yadav" 
>>   wrote:
>> 
>>   -1 (binding)
>> 
>>   All, I've found an upgrade blocker. Pre 4.6 users are required
>>   to seed 4.6 systemvmtemplate to proceed with the upgrade
>>   otherwise upgrade fails, and from 4.9 upgrade to 4.10 does no
>>   check/enforcement that 4.10 based systemvmtemplate has been
>>   seeded/registered, 

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1982: CLOUDSTACK-9807/CLOUDSTACK-9808 - Added upgrade chan...

[cloudmonger]

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1982
  
### ACS CI BVT Run
 **Sumarry:**
 Build Number 440
 Hypervisor xenserver
 NetworkType Advanced
 Passed=104
 Failed=1
 Skipped=7

_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_ 
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0


**Failed tests:**
* test_routers_network_ops.py

 * test_03_RVR_Network_check_router_state Failed


**Skipped tests:**
test_01_test_vm_volume_snapshot
test_vm_nic_adapter_vmxnet3
test_static_role_account_acls
test_11_ss_nfs_version_on_ssvm
test_nested_virtualization_vmware
test_3d_gpu_support
test_deploy_vgpu_enabled_vm

**Passed test suits:**
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata.py
test_affinity_groups_projects.py
test_portable_publicip.py
test_over_provisioning.py
test_global_settings.py
test_scale_vm.py
test_service_offerings.py
test_routers_iptables_default_policy.py
test_loadbalance.py
test_routers.py
test_reset_vm_on_reboot.py
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners.py
test_network.py
test_router_dns.py
test_non_contigiousvlan.py
test_login.py
test_deploy_vm_iso.py
test_list_ids_parameter.py
test_public_ip_range.py
test_multipleips_per_nic.py
test_regions.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_network_acl.py
test_pvlan.py
test_volumes.py
test_nic.py
test_deploy_vm_root_resize.py
test_resource_detail.py
test_secondary_storage.py
test_vm_life_cycle.py
test_disk_offerings.py


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1771: CLOUDSTACK-9611: Dedicating a Guest VLAN range to Pr...

[ustcweizhou]

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771
  
@nitin-maharana 
if this is performed in project view, should projectid be passed ?
projectId: args.context.projects[0].id


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1993: Fail to deploy VM instance when use.system.public.ip...

[blueorangutan]

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1993
  
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1993: Fail to deploy VM instance when use.system.public.ip...

[borisstoyanov]

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1993
  
Hi @jayapalu, do we have an issue in JIRA for this bug fix? 
@blueorangutan package


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---