[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] PaulAngus merged pull request #34: sync QiG with mater branch

[GitBox]

PaulAngus merged pull request #34: sync QiG with mater branch
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/34
 
 
   


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

RE: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.12.0.0

[Paul Angus]

Well done Gabriel,

Are you sorted to do the documentation or do you need some help?  I should have 
some time next week if you need a hand.

Kind regards

Paul.

paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Beims Bräscher  
Sent: 19 March 2019 21:37
To: dev ; users 
Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.12.0.0

Hi all,

After 3 business days, the vote for CloudStack 4.12.0.0 *passes* with 4 PMC
+ 2 non-PMC votes.

+1 (PMC / binding)
* Wido den Hollander
* Simon Weller
* Rafael Weingärtner
* Rohit Yadav

+1 (nonbinding)
* Gabriel Bräscher
* Nicolas Vazquez

0
none

-1
none

Thanks to everyone participating.

I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give 
the mirrors time to catch up.

Best regards,
Gabriel

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] andrijapanicsb opened a new pull request #34: sync QiG with mater branch

[GitBox]

andrijapanicsb opened a new pull request #34: sync QiG with mater branch
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/34
 
 
   Sync Quick Install Guide with mater branch


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] andrijapanicsb opened a new pull request #33: reference 4.11.2 systemvm template

[GitBox]

andrijapanicsb opened a new pull request #33: reference 4.11.2 systemvm template
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/33
 
 
   reference 4.11.2 systemvm template


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Re: CII best practices & cncf

[Sven Vogel]

Maybe for the container side of openstack?


__

Sven Vogel
Teamlead Platform

EWERK RZ GmbH
Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
P +49 341 42649 - 11
F +49 341 42649 - 18
s.vo...@ewerk.com
www.ewerk.com

Geschäftsführer:
Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Frank Richter, Gerhard Hoyer
Registergericht: Leipzig HRB 17023

Zertifiziert nach:
ISO/IEC 27001:2013
DIN EN ISO 9001:2015
DIN ISO/IEC 2-1:2011

EWERK-Blog | LinkedIn | Xing | Twitter | Facebook

Auskünfte und Angebote per Mail sind freibleibend und unverbindlich.

Disclaimer Privacy:
Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) ist 
vertraulich und nur für den Empfänger bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der 
bestimmungsgemäße Empfänger sein, ist Ihnen jegliche Offenlegung, 
Vervielfältigung, Weitergabe oder Nutzung des Inhalts untersagt. Bitte 
informieren Sie in diesem Fall unverzüglich den Absender und löschen Sie die 
E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) von Ihrem System. Vielen 
Dank.

The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential and 
may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is 
strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and 
then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.
> Am 21.03.2019 um 14:40 schrieb Marc-Aurèle Brothier :
>
> I thought I saw openstack in the list but I must be mixing it up with 
> something else since I can’t find it there anymore.
>
>> On 21 Mar 2019, at 13:31, Sven Vogel  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Marco,
>>
>> I think it’s a good thing for the first. By the second one cncf I thought 
>> it’s only for cloud native as the name it implies?
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Sven
>>
>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>
>>
>> __
>>
>> Sven Vogel
>> Teamlead Platform
>>
>> EWERK RZ GmbH
>> Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
>> P +49 341 42649 - 11
>> F +49 341 42649 - 18
>> s.vo...@ewerk.com
>> www.ewerk.com
>>
>> Geschäftsführer:
>> Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Frank Richter, Gerhard Hoyer
>> Registergericht: Leipzig HRB 17023
>>
>> Zertifiziert nach:
>> ISO/IEC 27001:2013
>> DIN EN ISO 9001:2015
>> DIN ISO/IEC 2-1:2011
>>
>> EWERK-Blog | LinkedIn | Xing | Twitter | Facebook
>>
>> Auskünfte und Angebote per Mail sind freibleibend und unverbindlich.
>>
>> Disclaimer Privacy:
>> Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) ist 
>> vertraulich und nur für den Empfänger bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der 
>> bestimmungsgemäße Empfänger sein, ist Ihnen jegliche Offenlegung, 
>> Vervielfältigung, Weitergabe oder Nutzung des Inhalts untersagt. Bitte 
>> informieren Sie in diesem Fall unverzüglich den Absender und löschen Sie die 
>> E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) von Ihrem System. 
>> Vielen Dank.
>>
>> The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential and 
>> may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
>> e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is 
>> strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and 
>> then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.
>>> Am 21.03.2019 um 13:14 schrieb Marc-Aurèle Brothier :
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I found recently the core infrastructure website and saw other projects 
>>> listed there, but not Cloudstack. So I thought it would be a good thing to 
>>> add this visibility. I’m in the process to fill up the form which you can 
>>> find here:
>>>
>>> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/2620
>>>
>>> I hope you don’t mind I started it without asking first the community.
>>>
>>> A next step I see would be to get listed on the cncf (cncf.io) to give even 
>>> more visibility to the project.
>>>
>>> Marco
>

Re: CII best practices & cncf

[Marc-Aurèle Brothier]

I thought I saw openstack in the list but I must be mixing it up with something 
else since I can’t find it there anymore.

> On 21 Mar 2019, at 13:31, Sven Vogel  wrote:
> 
> Hi Marco,
> 
> I think it’s a good thing for the first. By the second one cncf I thought 
> it’s only for cloud native as the name it implies?
> 
> Greetings
> 
> Sven
> 
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> 
> 
> __
> 
> Sven Vogel
> Teamlead Platform
> 
> EWERK RZ GmbH
> Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
> P +49 341 42649 - 11
> F +49 341 42649 - 18
> s.vo...@ewerk.com
> www.ewerk.com
> 
> Geschäftsführer:
> Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Frank Richter, Gerhard Hoyer
> Registergericht: Leipzig HRB 17023
> 
> Zertifiziert nach:
> ISO/IEC 27001:2013
> DIN EN ISO 9001:2015
> DIN ISO/IEC 2-1:2011
> 
> EWERK-Blog | LinkedIn | Xing | Twitter | Facebook
> 
> Auskünfte und Angebote per Mail sind freibleibend und unverbindlich.
> 
> Disclaimer Privacy:
> Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) ist 
> vertraulich und nur für den Empfänger bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der 
> bestimmungsgemäße Empfänger sein, ist Ihnen jegliche Offenlegung, 
> Vervielfältigung, Weitergabe oder Nutzung des Inhalts untersagt. Bitte 
> informieren Sie in diesem Fall unverzüglich den Absender und löschen Sie die 
> E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) von Ihrem System. Vielen 
> Dank.
> 
> The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential and 
> may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
> e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is 
> strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and 
> then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.
>> Am 21.03.2019 um 13:14 schrieb Marc-Aurèle Brothier :
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I found recently the core infrastructure website and saw other projects 
>> listed there, but not Cloudstack. So I thought it would be a good thing to 
>> add this visibility. I’m in the process to fill up the form which you can 
>> find here:
>> 
>> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/2620
>> 
>> I hope you don’t mind I started it without asking first the community.
>> 
>> A next step I see would be to get listed on the cncf (cncf.io) to give even 
>> more visibility to the project.
>> 
>> Marco

Re: CII best practices & cncf

[Sven Vogel]

Hi Marco,

I think it’s a good thing for the first. By the second one cncf I thought it’s 
only for cloud native as the name it implies?

Greetings

Sven

Von meinem iPhone gesendet


__

Sven Vogel
Teamlead Platform

EWERK RZ GmbH
Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
P +49 341 42649 - 11
F +49 341 42649 - 18
s.vo...@ewerk.com
www.ewerk.com

Geschäftsführer:
Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Frank Richter, Gerhard Hoyer
Registergericht: Leipzig HRB 17023

Zertifiziert nach:
ISO/IEC 27001:2013
DIN EN ISO 9001:2015
DIN ISO/IEC 2-1:2011

EWERK-Blog | LinkedIn | Xing | Twitter | Facebook

Auskünfte und Angebote per Mail sind freibleibend und unverbindlich.

Disclaimer Privacy:
Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) ist 
vertraulich und nur für den Empfänger bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der 
bestimmungsgemäße Empfänger sein, ist Ihnen jegliche Offenlegung, 
Vervielfältigung, Weitergabe oder Nutzung des Inhalts untersagt. Bitte 
informieren Sie in diesem Fall unverzüglich den Absender und löschen Sie die 
E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) von Ihrem System. Vielen 
Dank.

The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential and 
may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is 
strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and 
then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.
> Am 21.03.2019 um 13:14 schrieb Marc-Aurèle Brothier :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I found recently the core infrastructure website and saw other projects 
> listed there, but not Cloudstack. So I thought it would be a good thing to 
> add this visibility. I’m in the process to fill up the form which you can 
> find here:
>
> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/2620
>
> I hope you don’t mind I started it without asking first the community.
>
> A next step I see would be to get listed on the cncf (cncf.io) to give even 
> more visibility to the project.
>
> Marco

CII best practices & cncf

[Marc-Aurèle Brothier]

Hi all,

I found recently the core infrastructure website and saw other projects listed 
there, but not Cloudstack. So I thought it would be a good thing to add this 
visibility. I’m in the process to fill up the form which you can find here:

https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en/projects/2620

I hope you don’t mind I started it without asking first the community.

A next step I see would be to get listed on the cncf (cncf.io) to give even 
more visibility to the project.

Marco

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Dennis Konrad

[Dennis Konrad]

Hi all,

thank you very much for the opportunity to do more for the project. I will try 
to do my best to give Cloudstack more exposure
to potential users out there.

My focus is to get more attention for the project by trying to push features 
that benefit the whole community.
I think it's highly desirable to have a working open source cloud-solution 
that's able to do a solid job for the common use-cases.

Let's try to consolidate knowledge and work so we can benefit together.

Much success and best regards
Dennis Konrad

__

Dennis Konrad
System Engineer Infrastructure

EWERK RZ GmbH
Br?hl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
P +49 341 42649 - 11
F +49 341 42649 - 18
d.kon...@ewerk.com
www.ewerk.com

Gesch?ftsf?hrer:
Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Frank Richter, Gerhard Hoyer
Registergericht: Leipzig HRB 17023

Zertifiziert nach:
ISO/IEC 27001:2013
DIN EN ISO 9001:2015
DIN ISO/IEC 2-1:2011

EWERK-Blog | 
LinkedIn | 
Xing | 
Twitter | 
Facebook

Ausk?nfte und Angebote per Mail sind freibleibend und unverbindlich.

Disclaimer Privacy:
Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail (einschlie?lich etwaiger beigef?gter Dateien) ist 
vertraulich und nur f?r den Empf?nger bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der 
bestimmungsgem??e Empf?nger sein, ist Ihnen jegliche Offenlegung, 
Vervielf?ltigung, Weitergabe oder Nutzung des Inhalts untersagt. Bitte 
informieren Sie in diesem Fall unverz?glich den Absender und l?schen Sie die 
E-Mail (einschlie?lich etwaiger beigef?gter Dateien) von Ihrem System. Vielen 
Dank.

The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential and 
may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is 
strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and 
then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to jdk11 and use jlink

[Rohit Yadav]

Thanks Marc, we'll need to investigate and test of course, at this stage this 
is just an idea need discussion. We'll move to JDK11 (lts) sometime in future, 
however, I'm not proposing we rush that in the next major release.


Paul, by bundling the JRE in the packages and systemvm.iso - yes we'll need to 
release a CloudStack update (a) but that could be a good thing especially for 
distros which may not get the security update; (b) we won't need to publish a 
new systemvmtemplate as the JRE may be part of the systemvm.iso instead (i.e. 
don't install JRE in systemvmtemplate, but get it via systemvm.iso file; it may 
also make the template 50-200MB lighter in size).


Regards,

Rohit Yadav

Software Architect, ShapeBlue

https://www.shapeblue.com


From: Paul Angus 
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 2:08:18 PM
To: Marc-Aurèle Brothier; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to jdk11 and use jlink

It sounds like a good idea to get ahead of the curve..
We probably need a 'plan' which we can all get behind and ready the users for.  
especially if it is going to mean dropping some OS support.

one question, if we 'bundle java' and a Java vulnerability is found are we 
likely to have to release a CloudStack update, rather than advise users to 
upgrade their JRE?

From: Marc-Aurèle Brothier 
Sent: 20 March 2019 17:31
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to jdk11 and use jlink

Hi Rohit,

I think it’s a good move. After some recent testing I found some 
incompatibility between the jdk11 and older version of spring. I don’t have at 
hands the links but you have to upgrade to some specific version to make it 
work.

Marco


paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 

> On 20 Mar 2019, at 05:59, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
> All,
>
> JDK8 has reached eol wrt public updates from Oracle and JDK11 is the most 
> recent LTS. Should we discuss and plan the next release to move to JDK11, the 
> effort may be as minimal as changing the jdk requirements in maven config 
> files.
>
> Wrt consumption on centos6 (was there was an argument to drop centos6 
> support?) , centos7 and ubuntu 16.04+ with project jigsaw and jdk11's jlink 
> we can ship stripped down jre along with CloudStack artifacts. This would 
> mean we may no longer depend on distribution provided JRE, much like shipping 
> a single uberjar we can bundle stripped jre in it as well, including for 
> usage, kvm agent and systemvm agents. This can be beneficial in project's 
> control wrt security and CloudStack can still run on platforms that don't 
> have openjdk11 packages. The effort here I guess would be to create build 
> assemblies or use a maven plugin to export such a bundle. Thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to jdk11 and use jlink

[Paul Angus]

It sounds like a good idea to get ahead of the curve..
We probably need a 'plan' which we can all get behind and ready the users for.  
especially if it is going to mean dropping some OS support.

one question, if we 'bundle java' and a Java vulnerability is found are we 
likely to have to release a CloudStack update, rather than advise users to 
upgrade their JRE?

From: Marc-Aurèle Brothier 
Sent: 20 March 2019 17:31
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move to jdk11 and use jlink

Hi Rohit,

I think it’s a good move. After some recent testing I found some 
incompatibility between the jdk11 and older version of spring. I don’t have at 
hands the links but you have to upgrade to some specific version to make it 
work.

Marco


paul.an...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 

> On 20 Mar 2019, at 05:59, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
> All,
>
> JDK8 has reached eol wrt public updates from Oracle and JDK11 is the most 
> recent LTS. Should we discuss and plan the next release to move to JDK11, the 
> effort may be as minimal as changing the jdk requirements in maven config 
> files.
>
> Wrt consumption on centos6 (was there was an argument to drop centos6 
> support?) , centos7 and ubuntu 16.04+ with project jigsaw and jdk11's jlink 
> we can ship stripped down jre along with CloudStack artifacts. This would 
> mean we may no longer depend on distribution provided JRE, much like shipping 
> a single uberjar we can bundle stripped jre in it as well, including for 
> usage, kvm agent and systemvm agents. This can be beneficial in project's 
> control wrt security and CloudStack can still run on platforms that don't 
> have openjdk11 packages. The effort here I guess would be to create build 
> assemblies or use a maven plugin to export such a bundle. Thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>