Re: Re:Re: Re:Re: Getting Cracking on a 4.11.3

[Rohit Yadav]

All,

The 4.11.3.0 milestone has no outstanding item, based on latest test results x 
3 hypervisors the smoketests pass 100%: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3381

RC1 is unblocked to be cut on Monday, 10th June 2019. RC systemvmtemplate is at 
 
http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/testing/4.11.3-rc/

Please continue testing and kindly raise any blocker or critical bug. Thanks.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav


From: Haijiao <18602198...@163.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 6:14:33 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re:Re: Re:Re: Getting Cracking on a 4.11.3


Understood,  awaiting 4.13,  thanks !







At 2019-06-06 10:46:35, "Rohit Yadav"  wrote:
>Hi Haijiao,
>
>We cannot accept or back port completely new features on 4.11 branch, we 
>should ideally only accept bugfixes but sometimes small infra/operational 
>enhancements do make it in minor releases.
>
>Once 4.11.3.0 is out, we will work towards 4.13.0.0 and users can get all new 
>features with the next major release.
>
>Regards.
>
>Regards,
>Rohit Yadav
>
>
>From: Haijiao <18602198...@163.com>
>Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 7:25:34 AM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re:Re: Getting Cracking on a 4.11.3
>
>I know typically 4.11.3 would not accept new features but bug fixes.
>
>
>We have a couple of clients that need 'uploading local ISO via UI or API', 
>just wondering if 4.11.3 can include the PR  Add local ISO upload via UI #3251 
>, given it's already merged into master?
>
>
>Thanks !
>
>
>
>
>
>
>rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>www.shapeblue.com
>Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
>@shapeblue
>
>
>

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] richardlawley opened a new pull request #46: Simplify developer instructions, remove old instructions

[GitBox]

richardlawley opened a new pull request #46: Simplify developer instructions, 
remove old instructions
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/46
 
 
   This is an attempt at modernising the developer instructions for 4.11 
onwards.
   
   - Old instructions for pre-4.11 have been removed (can an archived version 
be added to the Archived Documentation section?)
   - The prerequisites have been greatly simplified (listing what's needed, and 
removing the verbose instructions in favour of paste-able package installation 
instructions - developers generally know how to install something!)
   - References to tomcat have been removed
   - Instructions for non-OSS packages included


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Re: Is anyone using SRX Integration?

[Richard Lawley]

> The last version we used is JunOS 10.x only.

Do you mean that you're not using them anymore?

> You can check the xml config files at the code path  
> scripts/network/juniper/,  in JunOS 15 to see configuration differences.

Unfortunately it's not as simple as that - the scripts file can be
edited to fix some of the changes, but others require code changes.
For example, looking for an existing port forward rule used to require
looking for the "dst-port" tag, now it requires the "name" tag.  This
is a code change.

Should I be trying to fix this in the codebase or not?  If nobody is
using JunOS 10 SRX devices with current releases of CloudStack then it
should not be a problem.

Re: Is anyone using SRX Integration?

[Jayapal Uradi]

On 07-Jun-2019, at 1:19 PM, Richard Lawley 
mailto:rich...@richardlawley.com>> wrote:

Are you using them, or is this just something which has been seen in the past?

We would like to get the current versions supported, but I don't want
to break functionality for existing systems.  JunOS 10 is very old!  I
don't have access to anything older than 15, so I don't know at what
point the syntax changed to prevent the current code from working.

The last version we used is JunOS 10.x only.
You can check the xml config files at the code path  scripts/network/juniper/,  
in JunOS 15 to see configuration differences.

Thanks,
Jayapal


On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 08:20, Jayapal Uradi 
mailto:jayapal.ur...@accelerite.com>> wrote:

Hi,

The mentioned functionalities works with  JunOs 10.x.
Not used JunOs 15.x. May be backward compatibility issues.


Thanks,
Jayapal


On 07-Jun-2019, at 12:45 PM, Richard Lawley 
mailto:rich...@richardlawley.com>>
 wrote:

Hi,

We've recently added a couple of Juniper SRXs, but are finding that
the integration with CloudStack is very broken.  So far there have
been a number of things which just don't work:
* Adding Static NAT Rules
* Adding Port Forwarding Rules
* Removing Port Forwarding Rules

I've found and fixed locally some of these things, but I'm trying to
work out whether this functionality ever worked?  The "Supported
External Devices" on the CloudStack website lists "SRX (Model srx100b)
versions 10.3 to 10.4 R7.5" - JunOS 10 went EOL in 2014.  We've been
using 15.x, so either the functionality never worked, or the changes
in JunOS broke compatibility with CloudStack.

I'm working finding and fixing the functionality, but I'd be
interested to know whether anyone was actively using any of this
integration, as if so, the fixes I apply may well break compatibility
with (much) older versions.

Regards,

Richard

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

Re: Is anyone using SRX Integration?

[Richard Lawley]

Are you using them, or is this just something which has been seen in the past?

We would like to get the current versions supported, but I don't want
to break functionality for existing systems.  JunOS 10 is very old!  I
don't have access to anything older than 15, so I don't know at what
point the syntax changed to prevent the current code from working.

On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 08:20, Jayapal Uradi  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The mentioned functionalities works with  JunOs 10.x.
> Not used JunOs 15.x. May be backward compatibility issues.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
>
> On 07-Jun-2019, at 12:45 PM, Richard Lawley 
> mailto:rich...@richardlawley.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We've recently added a couple of Juniper SRXs, but are finding that
> the integration with CloudStack is very broken.  So far there have
> been a number of things which just don't work:
> * Adding Static NAT Rules
> * Adding Port Forwarding Rules
> * Removing Port Forwarding Rules
>
> I've found and fixed locally some of these things, but I'm trying to
> work out whether this functionality ever worked?  The "Supported
> External Devices" on the CloudStack website lists "SRX (Model srx100b)
> versions 10.3 to 10.4 R7.5" - JunOS 10 went EOL in 2014.  We've been
> using 15.x, so either the functionality never worked, or the changes
> in JunOS broke compatibility with CloudStack.
>
> I'm working finding and fixing the functionality, but I'd be
> interested to know whether anyone was actively using any of this
> integration, as if so, the fixes I apply may well break compatibility
> with (much) older versions.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard
>
> DISCLAIMER
> ==
> This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
> property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only 
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, 
> print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this 
> communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of 
> this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any 
> liability for virus infected mails.

Re: Is anyone using SRX Integration?

[Jayapal Uradi]

Hi,

The mentioned functionalities works with  JunOs 10.x.
Not used JunOs 15.x. May be backward compatibility issues.


Thanks,
Jayapal


On 07-Jun-2019, at 12:45 PM, Richard Lawley 
mailto:rich...@richardlawley.com>> wrote:

Hi,

We've recently added a couple of Juniper SRXs, but are finding that
the integration with CloudStack is very broken.  So far there have
been a number of things which just don't work:
* Adding Static NAT Rules
* Adding Port Forwarding Rules
* Removing Port Forwarding Rules

I've found and fixed locally some of these things, but I'm trying to
work out whether this functionality ever worked?  The "Supported
External Devices" on the CloudStack website lists "SRX (Model srx100b)
versions 10.3 to 10.4 R7.5" - JunOS 10 went EOL in 2014.  We've been
using 15.x, so either the functionality never worked, or the changes
in JunOS broke compatibility with CloudStack.

I'm working finding and fixing the functionality, but I'd be
interested to know whether anyone was actively using any of this
integration, as if so, the fixes I apply may well break compatibility
with (much) older versions.

Regards,

Richard

DISCLAIMER
==
This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is the 
property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, copy, print, 
distribute or use this message. If you have received this communication in 
error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this message. 
Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any liability for 
virus infected mails.

Is anyone using SRX Integration?

[Richard Lawley]

Hi,

We've recently added a couple of Juniper SRXs, but are finding that
the integration with CloudStack is very broken.  So far there have
been a number of things which just don't work:
* Adding Static NAT Rules
* Adding Port Forwarding Rules
* Removing Port Forwarding Rules

I've found and fixed locally some of these things, but I'm trying to
work out whether this functionality ever worked?  The "Supported
External Devices" on the CloudStack website lists "SRX (Model srx100b)
versions 10.3 to 10.4 R7.5" - JunOS 10 went EOL in 2014.  We've been
using 15.x, so either the functionality never worked, or the changes
in JunOS broke compatibility with CloudStack.

I'm working finding and fixing the functionality, but I'd be
interested to know whether anyone was actively using any of this
integration, as if so, the fixes I apply may well break compatibility
with (much) older versions.

Regards,

Richard