[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #232: ui - Multiple server management documentation

[GitBox]

blueorangutan commented on pull request #232:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/232#issuecomment-896494391


   Doc build preview: http://qa.cloudstack.cloud/docs/WIP-PROOFING/pr/232. 
(SL-JID 130)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #232: ui - Multiple server management documentation

[GitBox]

blueorangutan commented on pull request #232:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/232#issuecomment-896494077


   @nvazquez a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep you 
posted as I make progress.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] nvazquez commented on pull request #232: ui - Multiple server management documentation

[GitBox]

nvazquez commented on pull request #232:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/232#issuecomment-896493832


   @blueorangutan docbuild


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: 2FA

[David Jumani]

Hi Rakesh,

MFA is generally done via an IAM rather than on a per-application basis. As 
Simon had mentioned, CloudStack does support SAML / LDAP so, in a general / 
corporate use case, the MFA would go there. So I do not think adding support 
for 2FA will add any significant benefit
That being said, I'll be happy to review any PR that's raised

From: Simon Weller 
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2021 12:31 AM
To: users ; dev 
Subject: Re: 2FA

Rakesh,

ACS does support SAML2 and in order to deploy 2FA/MFA, you could integrate it 
with an Identity and Access Management System such as Keycloak 
(https://www.keycloak.org/).

-Si


From: Rakesh Venkatesh 
http://www.rakeshv@gmail.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 4:34 AM
To: users ; dev 
Subject: 2FA

Hello

Has anyone thought about 2FA or about how to implement it in cloudstack?
Looks like this will be good addition to enhance the security. I have some
idea about implementing in the backend but dont have much idea on how to
display the QR code in ui or other functionalities which is needed for
frontend part.

--
Thanks and regards
Rakesh

 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 (RC1)

[Nicolas Vazquez]

+1 (binding) based on basic tests - Kubernetes cluster v 1.16.3


Regards,

Nicolas Vazquez


From: Gabriel Beims Bräscher 
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 4:12 PM
To: users 
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 (RC1)

+1 (binding) based on basic checks (GPG, checksum of source code).

Em ter., 10 de ago. de 2021 às 10:23, Daan Hoogland 
escreveu:

> checked the compile works and trusting Rohit's package verification
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 1:42 PM David Jumani 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created the initial CloudStack Kubernetes Provider release v1.0.0,
> > with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/1.0
> > Commit: a8fccd9fe5c145bc3a12e3681bdf33e9f6ed382c
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-v1.0.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 92D88ECF4D63C923):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > The docker image can be found at
> > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider
> >
> > The documentation for the same can be found at
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/blob/main/source/plugins/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider.rst
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blob/main/README.md#deployment
> > (be sure to replace the image version
> > `apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0` with
> > `apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0-RC20210804T0500`)
> >
> > The vote will be open until 08 August 2021.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Daan
>


--
Gabriel Beims Bräscher
Apache CloudStack PMC Chair

 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 (RC1)

[Gabriel Beims Bräscher]

+1 (binding) based on basic checks (GPG, checksum of source code).

Em ter., 10 de ago. de 2021 às 10:23, Daan Hoogland 
escreveu:

> checked the compile works and trusting Rohit's package verification
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 1:42 PM David Jumani 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created the initial CloudStack Kubernetes Provider release v1.0.0,
> > with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/1.0
> > Commit: a8fccd9fe5c145bc3a12e3681bdf33e9f6ed382c
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-v1.0.0/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 92D88ECF4D63C923):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > The docker image can be found at
> > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider
> >
> > The documentation for the same can be found at
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/blob/main/source/plugins/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider.rst
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blob/main/README.md#deployment
> > (be sure to replace the image version
> > `apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0` with
> > `apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0-RC20210804T0500`)
> >
> > The vote will be open until 08 August 2021.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Daan
>


-- 
Gabriel Beims Bräscher
Apache CloudStack PMC Chair

Re: 2FA

[Simon Weller]

Rakesh,

ACS does support SAML2 and in order to deploy 2FA/MFA, you could integrate it 
with an Identity and Access Management System such as Keycloak 
(https://www.keycloak.org/).

-Si


From: Rakesh Venkatesh 
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 4:34 AM
To: users ; dev 
Subject: 2FA

Hello

Has anyone thought about 2FA or about how to implement it in cloudstack?
Looks like this will be good addition to enhance the security. I have some
idea about implementing in the backend but dont have much idea on how to
display the QR code in ui or other functionalities which is needed for
frontend part.

--
Thanks and regards
Rakesh

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 (RC1)

[Daan Hoogland]

checked the compile works and trusting Rohit's package verification
+1 (binding)

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 1:42 PM David Jumani 
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I've created the initial CloudStack Kubernetes Provider release v1.0.0,
> with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/1.0
> Commit: a8fccd9fe5c145bc3a12e3681bdf33e9f6ed382c
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-v1.0.0/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 92D88ECF4D63C923):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> The docker image can be found at
> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider
>
> The documentation for the same can be found at
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/blob/main/source/plugins/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider.rst
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blob/main/README.md#deployment
> (be sure to replace the image version
> `apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0` with
> `apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0-RC20210804T0500`)
>
> The vote will be open until 08 August 2021.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
>
>

-- 
Daan

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #168: Add details for CoreOS replacement with Debian (SystemVM template) + Cluster Autoscaler

[GitBox]

blueorangutan commented on pull request #168:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/168#issuecomment-895967339


   Doc build preview: http://qa.cloudstack.cloud/docs/WIP-PROOFING/pr/168. 
(SL-JID 129)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #168: Add details for CoreOS replacement with Debian (SystemVM template) + Cluster Autoscaler

[GitBox]

blueorangutan commented on pull request #168:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/168#issuecomment-895966636


   @Pearl1594 a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] Pearl1594 commented on pull request #168: Add details for CoreOS replacement with Debian (SystemVM template) + Cluster Autoscaler

[GitBox]

Pearl1594 commented on pull request #168:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/168#issuecomment-895966157


   @blueorangutan docbuild


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] Pearl1594 removed a comment on pull request #168: Add details for CoreOS replacement with Debian (SystemVM template) + Cluster Autoscaler

[GitBox]

Pearl1594 removed a comment on pull request #168:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/168#issuecomment-895912096


   @blueorangutan docbuild


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] Pearl1594 commented on pull request #168: Add details for CoreOS replacement with Debian (SystemVM template) + Cluster Autoscaler

[GitBox]

Pearl1594 commented on pull request #168:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/168#issuecomment-895912096


   @blueorangutan docbuild


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #168: Add details for CoreOS replacement with Debian (SystemVM template) + Cluster Autoscaler

[GitBox]

blueorangutan commented on pull request #168:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/168#issuecomment-895883272


   Doc build preview: http://qa.cloudstack.cloud/docs/WIP-PROOFING/pr/168. 
(SL-JID 128)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] blueorangutan commented on pull request #168: Add details for CoreOS replacement with Debian (SystemVM template) + Cluster Autoscaler

[GitBox]

blueorangutan commented on pull request #168:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/168#issuecomment-895882579


   @Pearl1594 a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep 
you posted as I make progress.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] Pearl1594 commented on pull request #168: Add details for CoreOS replacement with Debian (SystemVM template) + Cluster Autoscaler

[GitBox]

Pearl1594 commented on pull request #168:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/168#issuecomment-895882211


   @blueorangutan docbuild


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

2FA

[Rakesh Venkatesh]

Hello

Has anyone thought about 2FA or about how to implement it in cloudstack?
Looks like this will be good addition to enhance the security. I have some
idea about implementing in the backend but dont have much idea on how to
display the QR code in ui or other functionalities which is needed for
frontend part.

-- 
Thanks and regards
Rakesh

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 (RC1)

[David Jumani]

Hi All,

The vote is still open as we need 3 binding +1s
Requesting PMCs to please cast their vote

From: David Jumani 
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 1:55 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 (RC1)

Hi All,

The vote for CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 *passes* with
1 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes.

+1 (PMC / binding)
1 person (Rohit)

+1 (non-binding)
2 people (Abhishek, Suresh)

0
none

-1
none

Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement 
to go out later this week and publish the images to Dockerhub.


From: Suresh Anaparti 
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 11:40 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 (RC1)

+1

Tested basic deployment for the Traefik ingress controller, using the 
Kubernetes Provider with the below RC build (Env: ACS main + KVM + K8s Cluster 
v1.16.3).

Regards,
Suresh

On 04/08/21, 5:12 PM, "David Jumani"  wrote:

Hi All,

I've created the initial CloudStack Kubernetes Provider release v1.0.0, 
with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/1.0
Commit: a8fccd9fe5c145bc3a12e3681bdf33e9f6ed382c

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-v1.0.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 92D88ECF4D63C923):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The docker image can be found at 
https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider

The documentation for the same can be found at

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/blob/main/source/plugins/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider.rst

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blob/main/README.md#deployment
(be sure to replace the image version 
`apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0` with 
`apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0-RC20210804T0500`)

The vote will be open until 08 August 2021.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,
David











 

Re: error - Unable to add the host

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi,

Do you have libvirtd installed/running? Please refer to:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/quickinstallationguide/qig.html#id1 
(CentOS)
https://rohityadav.cloud/blog/cloudstack-kvm/ (Ubuntu)

I'm assuming until now you were trying to install/setup 4.15.1 on CentOS7. On 
CentOS it checks if the /dev/kvm path exists and on Ubuntu it runs "kvm-ok" 
whose exit value should be 0 (that is, it exists). If you're on Ubuntu, please 
install kvm-ok using "apt-get install cpu-checker", and run it manually to 
check, for example:

$ kvm-ok
INFO: /dev/kvm exists
KVM acceleration can be used
$ echo $?
0

Regards.


From: technologyrss.mail 
Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 19:37
To: Rohit Yadav ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org 

Subject: Re: error - Unable to add the host


Please see my kvm server log from below image.


[cid:part1.34CC635F.755D11E5@gmail.com]

On 8/9/2021 6:08 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Alright, can you now try to add the KVM host?

Regards.






From: technologyrss.mail 

Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 4:32:56 PM
To: Rohit Yadav ; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org 

Subject: Re: error - Unable to add the host


Please see my image


[cid:part2.BDAB33CD.54C33C69@gmail.com]


On 8/9/2021 4:51 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Alright can you run:
modprobe kvm
modprobe kvm_intel

And then:
ls /dev/kvm
or,
kvm-ok


Regards.






From: technologyrss.mail 

Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 16:10
To: Rohit Yadav ; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org 

Subject: Re: error - Unable to add the host


I see as like below out put.


[cid:part7.B762B750.422C555B@gmail.com]



Alamin



On 8/9/2021 4:31 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi,

Then please check if the kernel you're using ships with KVM enabled. Something 
you can do lsmod​| grep kvm to check if your kernel ships with KVM.
I also see vmx in your cpuinfo output.


Regards.






From: technologyrss.mail 

Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 14:19
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
; Rohit Yadav 

Subject: Re: error - Unable to add the host


Yes,

My KVM server VT is already enable but I check again for over sure.


[cid:part12.74473EDB.7C745E8B@gmail.com]

and CPU info like as below.
[cid:part13.E4BD9937.F5FEF8A0@gmail.com]


I don't know what is issue.


On 8/9/2021 1:43 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi,

Do you've Intel VTX or AMD-V enabled on the host? You can check the 
/proc/cpuinfo or output of the kvm-ok command.
If this is a virtualised/nested VM, please check and enable hardware 
acceleration for your VM.


Regards.






From: technologyrss.mail 

Sent: Friday, August 6, 2021 20:13
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 

Subject: error - Unable to add the host


Hi,

I hope this is not many problem on my kvm server.

First error from log file. This log from ACS server. image 1

[cid:part1.6BF948D3.66C81DE8@gmail.com]

[cid:part2.CD61809B.AAD4FE4C@gmail.com]

2nd error from agent log file. This log from KVM server. image 2

[cid:part3.E338B67F.D9F307C4@gmail.com]

3rd error from ACS image 3.

[cid:part4.429C4B21.7BBDB4F3@gmail.com]

4th error from web browser as like below.

[cid:part5.E973A94F.247D11C4@gmail.com]

My KVM server bridge config as like below.

[cid:part6.EB16E136.465160F8@gmail.com]

Please help me how can I solve this issue.

--

Thanks & Regards.
Support Admin



Facebook | 
Twitter | 
YouTube | 
LinkedIn
Address : 116/1 West Malibagh, D. I. T Road
Dhaka-1217, Bangladesh
Mob : +88 01716915504
Email : support.ad...@technologyrss.com
Web : www.technologyrss.com

 

Re: Future of VPR - updates?

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Peter,

Some work is being done by my colleagues here which specifically improves 
systemvmtemplates management (registering/seeding and upgrades; same template 
for VR, systemvms, CKS etc.) and implements foundation for future improvements 
(this is currently targetted for 4.16):
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4329

I can share something we're exploring at work which will be discussed in the 
community in the future (not targetting 4.16):

  *   Support for IPv6 in VR (being discussed on dev@, phase1 in 
design/discussion - more on that in the other thread)
  *   Getting rid of systemvm.iso (an internally PoC confirmed our idea, in our 
backlog - TBD)
  *   Zero downtime upgrades using a new live patch admin API (patch the VR 
over ssh without destroying/rebooting it, in our backlog - TBD)
  *   A new stable and faster, lightweight VR agent (in investigation/poc state 
- TBD)
  *   Share-able networks for users (across projects/accounts) and user-shared 
networks (in design phase)
  *   A new network entity/construct that allows users to bring their own VR 
appliances and create VNF/custom networks (idea phase)

Regards.


From: peter.murysh...@zv.fraunhofer.de 
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 13:44
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: AW: Future of VPR - updates?

Hi there,

here is a talk where Rohit outlines the present, future and past of VPR in 
2018-2019

https://de.slideshare.net/ShapeBlue/rohit-yadav-the-future-of-the-cloudstack-virtual-router

What is the current VPR roadmap today in 2021, if available?

viele Grüße / kind regards

--


Peter Muryshkin

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft




 

Von: Muryshkin, Peter
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. August 2021 10:13:22
An: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Future of VPR - updates?

Hi there,

here is a talk where Rohit outlines the present, future and past of VPR in 
2018-2019

What is the current VPR roadmap today in 2021, if available?

viele Grüße / kind regards

--


Peter Muryshkin

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 (RC1)

[David Jumani]

Hi All,

Please ignore the previous mail, the voting thread is still open

From: David Jumani 
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 1:55 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 (RC1)

Hi All,

The vote for CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 *passes* with
1 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes.

+1 (PMC / binding)
1 person (Rohit)

+1 (non-binding)
2 people (Abhishek, Suresh)

0
none

-1
none

Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement 
to go out later this week and publish the images to Dockerhub.


From: Suresh Anaparti 
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 11:40 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 (RC1)

+1

Tested basic deployment for the Traefik ingress controller, using the 
Kubernetes Provider with the below RC build (Env: ACS main + KVM + K8s Cluster 
v1.16.3).

Regards,
Suresh

On 04/08/21, 5:12 PM, "David Jumani"  wrote:

Hi All,

I've created the initial CloudStack Kubernetes Provider release v1.0.0, 
with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/1.0
Commit: a8fccd9fe5c145bc3a12e3681bdf33e9f6ed382c

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-v1.0.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 92D88ECF4D63C923):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The docker image can be found at 
https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider

The documentation for the same can be found at

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/blob/main/source/plugins/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider.rst

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blob/main/README.md#deployment
(be sure to replace the image version 
`apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0` with 
`apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0-RC20210804T0500`)

The vote will be open until 08 August 2021.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,
David











 

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 (RC1)

[David Jumani]

Hi All,

The vote for CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 *passes* with
1 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes.

+1 (PMC / binding)
1 person (Rohit)

+1 (non-binding)
2 people (Abhishek, Suresh)

0
none

-1
none

Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement 
to go out later this week and publish the images to Dockerhub.


From: Suresh Anaparti 
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 11:40 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 (RC1)

+1

Tested basic deployment for the Traefik ingress controller, using the 
Kubernetes Provider with the below RC build (Env: ACS main + KVM + K8s Cluster 
v1.16.3).

Regards,
Suresh

On 04/08/21, 5:12 PM, "David Jumani"  wrote:

Hi All,

I've created the initial CloudStack Kubernetes Provider release v1.0.0, 
with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/1.0
Commit: a8fccd9fe5c145bc3a12e3681bdf33e9f6ed382c

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-v1.0.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 92D88ECF4D63C923):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The docker image can be found at 
https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider

The documentation for the same can be found at

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/blob/main/source/plugins/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider.rst

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blob/main/README.md#deployment
(be sure to replace the image version 
`apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0` with 
`apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0-RC20210804T0500`)

The vote will be open until 08 August 2021.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,
David








 

AW: Future of VPR - updates?

[peter.muryshkin]

Hi there,

here is a talk where Rohit outlines the present, future and past of VPR in 
2018-2019

https://de.slideshare.net/ShapeBlue/rohit-yadav-the-future-of-the-cloudstack-virtual-router

What is the current VPR roadmap today in 2021, if available?

viele Grüße / kind regards

--


Peter Muryshkin

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft



Von: Muryshkin, Peter
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. August 2021 10:13:22
An: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Future of VPR - updates?

Hi there,

here is a talk where Rohit outlines the present, future and past of VPR in 
2018-2019

What is the current VPR roadmap today in 2021, if available?

viele Grüße / kind regards

--


Peter Muryshkin

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft

Future of VPR - updates?

[peter.muryshkin]

Hi there,

here is a talk where Rohit outlines the present, future and past of VPR in 
2018-2019

What is the current VPR roadmap today in 2021, if available?

viele Grüße / kind regards

--


Peter Muryshkin

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack Kubernetes Provider v1.0.0 (RC1)

[Suresh Anaparti]

+1

Tested basic deployment for the Traefik ingress controller, using the 
Kubernetes Provider with the below RC build (Env: ACS main + KVM + K8s Cluster 
v1.16.3).
 
Regards,
Suresh

On 04/08/21, 5:12 PM, "David Jumani"  wrote:

Hi All,

I've created the initial CloudStack Kubernetes Provider release v1.0.0, 
with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/tree/1.0
Commit: a8fccd9fe5c145bc3a12e3681bdf33e9f6ed382c

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/kubernetes-provider-v1.0.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 92D88ECF4D63C923):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The docker image can be found at 
https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider

The documentation for the same can be found at

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/blob/main/source/plugins/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider.rst

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider/blob/main/README.md#deployment
(be sure to replace the image version 
`apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0` with 
`apache/cloudstack-kubernetes-provider:v1.0.0-RC20210804T0500`)

The vote will be open until 08 August 2021.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Thanks,
David