Re: [PR] [StepSecurity] ci: Harden GitHub Actions [cloudstack-go]

2024-04-15 Thread via GitHub


DaanHoogland commented on PR #81:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-go/pull/81#issuecomment-2056612835

   @rohityadavcloud as the build passes can we merge this (cc @jbampton )?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cloudstack.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

2024-04-15 Thread Daan Hoogland
I think your proposals are ok as an ad-hoc solution to the current
situation @Rohit Yadav . I wonder how we should deal with this in the
future though.

1. As for the numbering, do we have a procedure to prevent this issue
in the future?
2. The provider is part of apache and I think the link
https://github.com/apache/terraform-provider-cloudstack should be
validated. What exactly is the objection to this?

On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 12:05 PM Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
> All,
>
> The recent Terraform provider release v0.5.0 has a problem with the Terraform 
> registry website. 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/109
>
> The registry support isn't able to provide a resolution now, their manual 
> resync button on the provider isn't fixing the issue.
>
> While I've documented the steps for manually installing and using the 
> provider. Most terraform/tofu users are used to consuming a provider from the 
> registry.
>
> If there are no objections, I propose that we just tag the current version as 
> v0.5.1 and push it on the registry for the purpose of publishing on the 
> registry website. We may need not do a formal vote for this as code wise 
> nothing has changed and we can make this tag to be a community release tag 
> solely done for the purpose of having a workaround on the registry website  
> https://registry.terraform.io/providers/cloudstack/cloudstack/latest which 
> gets published via 
> https://github.com/cloudstack/terraform-provider-cloudstack as the registry 
> also has a strict repo naming policy (due to which it can't use the repo 
> under Apache org).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Regards.
>
>
>


-- 
Daan


[DISCUSS] New terraform git tag for registry workaround

2024-04-15 Thread Rohit Yadav
All,

The recent Terraform provider release v0.5.0 has a problem with the Terraform 
registry website. 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/109

The registry support isn't able to provide a resolution now, their manual 
resync button on the provider isn't fixing the issue.

While I've documented the steps for manually installing and using the provider. 
Most terraform/tofu users are used to consuming a provider from the registry.

If there are no objections, I propose that we just tag the current version as 
v0.5.1 and push it on the registry for the purpose of publishing on the 
registry website. We may need not do a formal vote for this as code wise 
nothing has changed and we can make this tag to be a community release tag 
solely done for the purpose of having a workaround on the registry website  
https://registry.terraform.io/providers/cloudstack/cloudstack/latest which gets 
published via https://github.com/cloudstack/terraform-provider-cloudstack as 
the registry also has a strict repo naming policy (due to which it can't use 
the repo under Apache org).

Thoughts?

Regards.