subject:"\[VOTE\] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1"

No, it won't help. It won't remove the kvmclock xml, just generate xml
that explicitly disables kvmclock. See my email above.

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
 Sure, Rohit, I can try that. I'm pretty sure I did put that property in
 already, but let me try that again in case I spelled something wrong or
 made some other data-entry error in the file that led to it not working for
 me.

 On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:

 Mike can you try by adding kvmclock.disable=true in your
 agent.properties and test if it then works (this is a workaround).

 On Friday 06 February 2015 01:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5
 (due to this kvmclock issue).

 How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine
 if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with
 regards to KVM on CS 4.5?

 Thanks,
 Mike

 On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

 FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on
 Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the
 same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.

 On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
 rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:

 Hi Wilder,

 The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I
 think
 as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
 test 4.4.2
 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.

 I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and
 upgrade
 scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
 is pretty
 smooth with fewer rough edges.

 On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:

 Hi there,

 We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
 and we have
 Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
 Ubuntu 12.04.

 Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and
 help to
 fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
 cool.

 Cheers,
 Wilder


 On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04
 to 14.04, I
 was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected
 would be the case).

 As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if
 Ubuntu 12.04 should
 be a supported platform for CS 4.5.

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

  Thanks, Rohit

  As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility
 issue with Ubuntu
  12.04 (which is what I'm running).

  On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
  rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.__com
 mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:

  Hi Mike,

  I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04
 and local storage
  seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it
 thoroughly things
  like migration, attaching/detach localstorage
 disks etc.

   On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
  
   Hi everyone,
  
   Any news on this?
  
   I am still having trouble creating a VM on
 local storage on
  KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in
 agent.properties).
  
   I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-02-06 Thread Mike Tutkowski

Sure, Rohit, I can try that. I'm pretty sure I did put that property in
already, but let me try that again in case I spelled something wrong or
made some other data-entry error in the file that led to it not working for
me.

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:

 Mike can you try by adding kvmclock.disable=true in your
 agent.properties and test if it then works (this is a workaround).

 On Friday 06 February 2015 01:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS 4.5
 (due to this kvmclock issue).

 How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to determine
 if we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with
 regards to KVM on CS 4.5?

 Thanks,
 Mike

 On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

 FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on
 Ubuntu 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the
 same issue would be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.

 On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
 rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:

 Hi Wilder,

 The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I
 think
 as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
 test 4.4.2
 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.

 I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and
 upgrade
 scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
 is pretty
 smooth with fewer rough edges.

 On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:

 Hi there,

 We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
 and we have
 Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
 Ubuntu 12.04.

 Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and
 help to
 fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
 cool.

 Cheers,
 Wilder


 On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04
 to 14.04, I
 was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected
 would be the case).

 As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if
 Ubuntu 12.04 should
 be a supported platform for CS 4.5.

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

  Thanks, Rohit

  As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility
 issue with Ubuntu
  12.04 (which is what I'm running).

  On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
  rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.__com
 mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:

  Hi Mike,

  I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04
 and local storage
  seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it
 thoroughly things
  like migration, attaching/detach localstorage
 disks etc.

   On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  mailto:mike.tutkowski@__solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
  
   Hi everyone,
  
   Any news on this?
  
   I am still having trouble creating a VM on
 local storage on
  KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in
 agent.properties).
  
   I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
  
   Thanks!
   Mike
  
   On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder
 Rodrigues

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-02-06 Thread Nux!

That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care.

Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear complains 
about clock performance in VMs.

Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through agent.properties if 
desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false?

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

 I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
 things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
 packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
 do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
 targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
 of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
 support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
 the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

Sure, I agree. It just makes it tough to detect features when we're
targeting multiple platforms.

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 Roger that.
 Well, backports without version change is one of the main reasons I use 
 (RH)EL, so depends you look at it.
 Anyway, it does not seem like a big thing affecting users, so good job on 
 finding a fix. Thanks.

 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
 From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 16:22:15
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

 CentOS *6* users, that is...


 On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
 If a vm is pv enabled, it gets the kvmclock timer xml attribute,
 regardless. Setting kvmclock.disable makes that timer xml explicitly
 disable kvmclock, it doesn't remove it from the xml (You might be
 thinking why do we need a setting to enable it if we have to
 explicitly disable it to make it go away?... this is again due to
 variations in version behavior, some versions make pv guests have
 kvmclock regardless unless explicitly disabled). There were some
 issues in certain kvm (kernel) versions that would cause problems with
 live migration and kvmclock, so this option would fix that if someone
 runs into it, but we can't leverage this agent option to remove the
 xml that the ubuntu 12.04 libvirt version doesn't support.

 Nux, some more background, at one point system vms were having various
 issues because of clock drift. A few of the other hypervisor platforms
 were leveraging their hypervisor to fix this. Running ntp in the
 system vm was mentioned (and perhaps even implemented, I'd have to go
 back and look), but some didn't like that solution, either, because
 without a project to add ntp settings as a 'thing' in cloudstack it
 would require internet access or an admin rolling their own system vm.
 Network issues aside, f you look around at the greater KVM ecosystem
 there is quite a bit of back and forth on whether kvmclock or NTP is
 ideal, and the best option seems to be to have both.

 So that, combined with the live migration issues, is what introduced
 the kvmclock xml both to make it available to pv guests and to
 explicitly disable it if there are issues.

 I spoke to Mike about this last night, and hopefully we'll be seeing a
 fix that simply acts like older CS versions if we detect the feature
 is unsupported. So we'll automagically work on newer platforms like
 Ubuntu 13+ and CentOS 7 and fail back correctly for old Ubuntu, with
 the only downside being that CentOS users can't leverage kvmclock even
 though their build supports it (the fault of RH backporting features
 without changing versions).




 On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care.

 Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear 
 complains
 about clock performance in VMs.

 Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through 
 agent.properties if
 desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false?

 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
 From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

 I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
 things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
 packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
 do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
 targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
 of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
 support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
  the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

If a vm is pv enabled, it gets the kvmclock timer xml attribute,
regardless. Setting kvmclock.disable makes that timer xml explicitly
disable kvmclock, it doesn't remove it from the xml (You might be
thinking why do we need a setting to enable it if we have to
explicitly disable it to make it go away?... this is again due to
variations in version behavior, some versions make pv guests have
kvmclock regardless unless explicitly disabled). There were some
issues in certain kvm (kernel) versions that would cause problems with
live migration and kvmclock, so this option would fix that if someone
runs into it, but we can't leverage this agent option to remove the
xml that the ubuntu 12.04 libvirt version doesn't support.

Nux, some more background, at one point system vms were having various
issues because of clock drift. A few of the other hypervisor platforms
were leveraging their hypervisor to fix this. Running ntp in the
system vm was mentioned (and perhaps even implemented, I'd have to go
back and look), but some didn't like that solution, either, because
without a project to add ntp settings as a 'thing' in cloudstack it
would require internet access or an admin rolling their own system vm.
Network issues aside, f you look around at the greater KVM ecosystem
there is quite a bit of back and forth on whether kvmclock or NTP is
ideal, and the best option seems to be to have both.

So that, combined with the live migration issues, is what introduced
the kvmclock xml both to make it available to pv guests and to
explicitly disable it if there are issues.

I spoke to Mike about this last night, and hopefully we'll be seeing a
fix that simply acts like older CS versions if we detect the feature
is unsupported. So we'll automagically work on newer platforms like
Ubuntu 13+ and CentOS 7 and fail back correctly for old Ubuntu, with
the only downside being that CentOS users can't leverage kvmclock even
though their build supports it (the fault of RH backporting features
without changing versions).




On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care.

 Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear 
 complains about clock performance in VMs.

 Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through agent.properties 
 if desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false?

 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
 From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

 I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
 things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
 packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
 do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
 targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
 of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
 support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
 the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

CentOS *6* users, that is...


On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
 If a vm is pv enabled, it gets the kvmclock timer xml attribute,
 regardless. Setting kvmclock.disable makes that timer xml explicitly
 disable kvmclock, it doesn't remove it from the xml (You might be
 thinking why do we need a setting to enable it if we have to
 explicitly disable it to make it go away?... this is again due to
 variations in version behavior, some versions make pv guests have
 kvmclock regardless unless explicitly disabled). There were some
 issues in certain kvm (kernel) versions that would cause problems with
 live migration and kvmclock, so this option would fix that if someone
 runs into it, but we can't leverage this agent option to remove the
 xml that the ubuntu 12.04 libvirt version doesn't support.

 Nux, some more background, at one point system vms were having various
 issues because of clock drift. A few of the other hypervisor platforms
 were leveraging their hypervisor to fix this. Running ntp in the
 system vm was mentioned (and perhaps even implemented, I'd have to go
 back and look), but some didn't like that solution, either, because
 without a project to add ntp settings as a 'thing' in cloudstack it
 would require internet access or an admin rolling their own system vm.
 Network issues aside, f you look around at the greater KVM ecosystem
 there is quite a bit of back and forth on whether kvmclock or NTP is
 ideal, and the best option seems to be to have both.

 So that, combined with the live migration issues, is what introduced
 the kvmclock xml both to make it available to pv guests and to
 explicitly disable it if there are issues.

 I spoke to Mike about this last night, and hopefully we'll be seeing a
 fix that simply acts like older CS versions if we detect the feature
 is unsupported. So we'll automagically work on newer platforms like
 Ubuntu 13+ and CentOS 7 and fail back correctly for old Ubuntu, with
 the only downside being that CentOS users can't leverage kvmclock even
 though their build supports it (the fault of RH backporting features
 without changing versions).




 On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care.

 Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear 
 complains about clock performance in VMs.

 Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through agent.properties 
 if desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false?

 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
 From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

 I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
 things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
 packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
 do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
 targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
 of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
 support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
 the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-02-06 Thread Nux!

Roger that.
Well, backports without version change is one of the main reasons I use (RH)EL, 
so depends you look at it.
Anyway, it does not seem like a big thing affecting users, so good job on 
finding a fix. Thanks.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 16:22:15
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

 CentOS *6* users, that is...
 
 
 On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
 If a vm is pv enabled, it gets the kvmclock timer xml attribute,
 regardless. Setting kvmclock.disable makes that timer xml explicitly
 disable kvmclock, it doesn't remove it from the xml (You might be
 thinking why do we need a setting to enable it if we have to
 explicitly disable it to make it go away?... this is again due to
 variations in version behavior, some versions make pv guests have
 kvmclock regardless unless explicitly disabled). There were some
 issues in certain kvm (kernel) versions that would cause problems with
 live migration and kvmclock, so this option would fix that if someone
 runs into it, but we can't leverage this agent option to remove the
 xml that the ubuntu 12.04 libvirt version doesn't support.

 Nux, some more background, at one point system vms were having various
 issues because of clock drift. A few of the other hypervisor platforms
 were leveraging their hypervisor to fix this. Running ntp in the
 system vm was mentioned (and perhaps even implemented, I'd have to go
 back and look), but some didn't like that solution, either, because
 without a project to add ntp settings as a 'thing' in cloudstack it
 would require internet access or an admin rolling their own system vm.
 Network issues aside, f you look around at the greater KVM ecosystem
 there is quite a bit of back and forth on whether kvmclock or NTP is
 ideal, and the best option seems to be to have both.

 So that, combined with the live migration issues, is what introduced
 the kvmclock xml both to make it available to pv guests and to
 explicitly disable it if there are issues.

 I spoke to Mike about this last night, and hopefully we'll be seeing a
 fix that simply acts like older CS versions if we detect the feature
 is unsupported. So we'll automagically work on newer platforms like
 Ubuntu 13+ and CentOS 7 and fail back correctly for old Ubuntu, with
 the only downside being that CentOS users can't leverage kvmclock even
 though their build supports it (the fault of RH backporting features
 without changing versions).




 On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 That's unfortunate, but I don't think many people will care.

 Pretty much everyone in virt uses ntp religiously and am yet to hear 
 complains
 about clock performance in VMs.

 Having said that, could the feature be enforceable through agent.properties 
 if
 desired? Something like Rohit is suggesting with kvmclock.disable=false?

 Lucian

 --
 Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

 Nux!
 www.nux.ro

 - Original Message -
 From: Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Friday, 6 February, 2015 06:45:14
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

 I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
 things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
 packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
 do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
 targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
 of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
 support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
  the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-02-05 Thread Marcus

I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.


On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
 OK - thanks, Andrei

 Marcus - Do we want to put a plan in place to fix or remove kvmclock in
 Ubuntu 12.04? CS 4.5 is not yet GA, so we should probably come up with a
 plan of attack soon.

 Technically this just impacts using KVM on Ubuntu 12.04 in CS 4.5 (and
 4.6), I believe.

 Thanks!

 On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
 wrote:

 I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in terms
 of it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see
 Windows 2012 servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as
 Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04.

 Andrei
 - Original Message -

  From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

  Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.

  I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still
  is,
  so it's great to have your comments.

  On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
  and...@arhont.com
  wrote:

   Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the
   community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04
   already,
   but there are still tons of 12.04 installs.
  
   Andrei
  
   - Original Message -
  
From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
To: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com,
dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit
int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud
int-cl...@schubergphilis.com
Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
  
Hi everyone,
  
So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on
CS
4.5
(due to this kvmclock issue).
  
How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
determine if
we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments
with
regards to KVM on CS 4.5?
  
Thanks,
Mike
  
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
  
 FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start
 on
 Ubuntu
 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
 issue would
 be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.

 On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
 rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:

 Hi Wilder,

 The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04),
 I
 think
 as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
 test
 4.4.2
 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.

 I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components
 and
 upgrade
 scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
 is
 pretty
 smooth with fewer rough edges.

 On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues
 wrote:

 Hi there,

 We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
 and we
 have
 Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
 Ubuntu
 12.04.

 Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and
 help
 to
 fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
 cool.

 Cheers,
 Wilder


 On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to
 14.04, I
 was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would
 be
 the case).

 As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu
 12.04
 should
 be a supported platform for CS 4.5.

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

 Thanks, Rohit

 As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with
 Ubuntu
 12.04 (which is what I'm running).

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
 rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:

 Hi Mike,

 I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local
 storage

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-02-05 Thread Mike Tutkowski

Sounds reasonable to me.

Would you be willing to put those changes in for 4.5 before we spin up
another RC, Marcus?

On Thursday, February 5, 2015, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think we can wrap this in a version check as we have many other
 things, that way Ubuntu 12.04 users who leverage newer libvirt
 packages (as I'm temped to believe the majority of actual deployments
 do) can still see the benefit, and we don't have to worry about
 targeting a specific release. This will have the negative side effect
 of not allowing centos 6.x people from leveraging their backported
 support since their version numbers are deceptive, but it's probably
 the smartest, most compatible way to indroduce it.


 On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
  OK - thanks, Andrei
 
  Marcus - Do we want to put a plan in place to fix or remove kvmclock in
  Ubuntu 12.04? CS 4.5 is not yet GA, so we should probably come up with a
  plan of attack soon.
 
  Technically this just impacts using KVM on Ubuntu 12.04 in CS 4.5 (and
  4.6), I believe.
 
  Thanks!
 
  On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
  wrote:
 
  I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in
 terms
  of it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see
  Windows 2012 servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as
  Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04.
 
  Andrei
  - Original Message -
 
   From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
   Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
   Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
 
   Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.
 
   I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still
   is,
   so it's great to have your comments.
 
   On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
   and...@arhont.com
   wrote:
 
Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the
community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04
already,
but there are still tons of 12.04 installs.
   
Andrei
   
- Original Message -
   
 From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 To: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com,
 dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit
 int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud
 int-cl...@schubergphilis.com
 Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
   
 Hi everyone,
   
 So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on
 CS
 4.5
 (due to this kvmclock issue).
   
 How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
 determine if
 we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments
 with
 regards to KVM on CS 4.5?
   
 Thanks,
 Mike
   
 On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
   
  FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start
  on
  Ubuntu
  12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
  issue would
  be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.
 
  On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
  rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
  wrote:
 
  Hi Wilder,
 
  The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04),
  I
  think
  as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
  test
  4.4.2
  to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.
 
  I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components
  and
  upgrade
  scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
  is
  pretty
  smooth with fewer rough edges.
 
  On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues
  wrote:
 
  Hi there,
 
  We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
  and we
  have
  Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
  Ubuntu
  12.04.
 
  Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and
  help
  to
  fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
  cool.
 
  Cheers,
  Wilder
 
 
  On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
 
  Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to
  14.04, I
  was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would
  be
  the case).
 
  As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu
  12.04
  should
  be a supported platform for CS 4.5.
 
  On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  wrote:
 
  Thanks, Rohit

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-02-05 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky

Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the community. 
I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04 already, but there are 
still tons of 12.04 installs. 

Andrei 

- Original Message -

 From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 To: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com,
 dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit
 int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud
 int-cl...@schubergphilis.com
 Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

 Hi everyone,

 So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS
 4.5
 (due to this kvmclock issue).

 How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
 determine if
 we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with
 regards to KVM on CS 4.5?

 Thanks,
 Mike

 On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

  FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on
  Ubuntu
  12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
  issue would
  be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.

  On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
  rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
  wrote:

  Hi Wilder,

  The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I
  think
  as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test
  4.4.2
  to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.

  I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and
  upgrade
  scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is
  pretty
  smooth with fewer rough edges.

  On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:

  Hi there,

  We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we
  have
  Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
  Ubuntu
  12.04.

  Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help
  to
  fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
  cool.

  Cheers,
  Wilder

  On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

  Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to
  14.04, I
  was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be
  the case).

  As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04
  should
  be a supported platform for CS 4.5.

  On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  wrote:

  Thanks, Rohit

  As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with
  Ubuntu
  12.04 (which is what I'm running).

  On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
  rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
  wrote:

  Hi Mike,

  I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage
  seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things
  like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.

   On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

   Hi everyone,

   Any news on this?

   I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on
  KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).

   I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.

   Thanks!
   Mike

   On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
  wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
  mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
   Okay, thanks for the clarification.

   I will test it over the weekend.

   Cheers,
   Wilder

   On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav
  rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
  wrote:

Hi Wilder,

If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which
  should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
  d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.

On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
  wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
  mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:

Hi Rohit,

Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
  8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740

Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used
  and I will test it.

Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit
  away from the list. :)

Cheers,
Wilder

On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav
  rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
  wrote:

Hi Wilder,

Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were
  against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your
  tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks.

Regards.

On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
  wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
  mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:

Hi all,

Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it
  only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-02-05 Thread Mike Tutkowski

Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.

I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still is,
so it's great to have your comments.

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
wrote:

 Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the
 community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04 already,
 but there are still tons of 12.04 installs.

 Andrei

 - Original Message -

  From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  To: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
  Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com,
  dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit
  int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud
  int-cl...@schubergphilis.com
  Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

  Hi everyone,

  So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on CS
  4.5
  (due to this kvmclock issue).

  How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
  determine if
  we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments with
  regards to KVM on CS 4.5?

  Thanks,
  Mike

  On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski 
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

   FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on
   Ubuntu
   12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
   issue would
   be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.
  
   On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
   rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
   wrote:
  
   Hi Wilder,
  
   The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I
   think
   as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test
   4.4.2
   to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.
  
   I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and
   upgrade
   scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is
   pretty
   smooth with fewer rough edges.
  
   On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:
  
   Hi there,
  
   We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we
   have
   Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
   Ubuntu
   12.04.
  
   Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help
   to
   fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
   cool.
  
   Cheers,
   Wilder
  
  
   On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
   mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
  
   Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to
   14.04, I
   was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be
   the case).
  
   As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04
   should
   be a supported platform for CS 4.5.
  
   On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
   mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   wrote:
  
   Thanks, Rohit
  
   As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with
   Ubuntu
   12.04 (which is what I'm running).
  
   On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
   rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
   wrote:
  
   Hi Mike,
  
   I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage
   seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things
   like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.
  
On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
   mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
   
Hi everyone,
   
Any news on this?
   
I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on
   KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
   
I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
   
Thanks!
Mike
   
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
   wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
   mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Okay, thanks for the clarification.
   
I will test it over the weekend.
   
Cheers,
Wilder
   
On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav
   rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
   wrote:
   
 Hi Wilder,

 If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which
   should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
   d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.

 On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
   wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
   mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:

 Hi Rohit,

 Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
   8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740

 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used
   and I will test it.

 Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit
   away from the list. :)

 Cheers,
 Wilder

 On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav
   rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
   wrote:

 Hi Wilder,

 Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were
   against

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-02-05 Thread Mike Tutkowski

OK - thanks, Andrei

Marcus - Do we want to put a plan in place to fix or remove kvmclock in
Ubuntu 12.04? CS 4.5 is not yet GA, so we should probably come up with a
plan of attack soon.

Technically this just impacts using KVM on Ubuntu 12.04 in CS 4.5 (and
4.6), I believe.

Thanks!

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
wrote:

 I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in terms
 of it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see
 Windows 2012 servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as
 Ubuntu 14.04 and 12.04.

 Andrei
 - Original Message -

  From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
  Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

  Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.

  I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still
  is,
  so it's great to have your comments.

  On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
  and...@arhont.com
  wrote:

   Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the
   community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04
   already,
   but there are still tons of 12.04 installs.
  
   Andrei
  
   - Original Message -
  
From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
To: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com,
dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit
int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud
int-cl...@schubergphilis.com
Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1
  
Hi everyone,
  
So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on
CS
4.5
(due to this kvmclock issue).
  
How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
determine if
we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments
with
regards to KVM on CS 4.5?
  
Thanks,
Mike
  
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
  
 FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start
 on
 Ubuntu
 12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
 issue would
 be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.

 On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
 rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:

 Hi Wilder,

 The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04),
 I
 think
 as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
 test
 4.4.2
 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.

 I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components
 and
 upgrade
 scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
 is
 pretty
 smooth with fewer rough edges.

 On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues
 wrote:

 Hi there,

 We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
 and we
 have
 Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
 Ubuntu
 12.04.

 Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and
 help
 to
 fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
 cool.

 Cheers,
 Wilder


 On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to
 14.04, I
 was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would
 be
 the case).

 As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu
 12.04
 should
 be a supported platform for CS 4.5.

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

 Thanks, Rohit

 As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with
 Ubuntu
 12.04 (which is what I'm running).

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
 rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:

 Hi Mike,

 I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local
 storage
 seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things
 like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.

  On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
 
  Hi everyone,
 
  Any news on this?
 
  I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage
  on
 KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in
 agent.properties).
 
  I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
 
  Thanks!
  Mike
 
  On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
 wrodrig

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-02-05 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky

I personally would compare Ubuntu 12.04 to Windows Server 2008R2 in terms of 
it's popularity compared with the next stable release. You do see Windows 2012 
servers about, but 2008R2 is still very popular. Same as Ubuntu 14.04 and 
12.04. 

Andrei 
- Original Message -

 From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 10:29:19 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

 Thanks for the feedback, Andrei.

 I personally don't have a good feel for how common or not 12.04 still
 is,
 so it's great to have your comments.

 On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky
 and...@arhont.com
 wrote:

  Mike, I think dropping Ubuntu 12.04 will not be taken kindly by the
  community. I am not speaking for myself as I've upgraded to 14.04
  already,
  but there are still tons of 12.04 installs.

  Andrei

  - Original Message -

   From: Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   To: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
   Cc: Wilder Rodrigues wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com,
   dev@cloudstack.apache.org, int-toolkit
   int-tool...@schubergphilis.com, int-cloud
   int-cl...@schubergphilis.com
   Sent: Thursday, 5 February, 2015 8:01:38 PM
   Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

   Hi everyone,

   So, what do we want to do here? It seems that KVM doesn't work on
   CS
   4.5
   (due to this kvmclock issue).

   How do we go about collecting enough data points in order to
   determine if
   we can drop Ubuntu 12.04 from the supported list of environments
   with
   regards to KVM on CS 4.5?

   Thanks,
   Mike

   On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski 
   mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start
on
Ubuntu
12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same
issue would
be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:

Hi Wilder,

The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04),
I
think
as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help
test
4.4.2
to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.

I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components
and
upgrade
scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process
is
pretty
smooth with fewer rough edges.

On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues
wrote:

Hi there,

We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment
and we
have
Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to
Ubuntu
12.04.

Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and
help
to
fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be
cool.

Cheers,
Wilder

On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to
14.04, I
was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would
be
the case).

As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu
12.04
should
be a supported platform for CS 4.5.

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:

Thanks, Rohit

As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with
Ubuntu
12.04 (which is what I'm running).

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:

Hi Mike,

I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local
storage
seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things
like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.

 On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 Any news on this?

 I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage
 on
KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in
agent.properties).

 I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.

 Thanks!
 Mike

 On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
 Okay, thanks for the clarification.

 I will test it over the weekend.

 Cheers,
 Wilder

 On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:

  Hi Wilder,

  If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which
should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-02-04 Thread Mike Tutkowski

FYI: From what I observed, I could not get a user VM to start on Ubuntu
12.04.1 using CloudStack 4.6. I think Marcus believes the same issue would
be present using CloudStack 4.5 with Ubuntu 12.04.1.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:

 Hi Wilder,

 The issue I shared was related to KVM (based on Ubuntu 14.04), I think
 as user VMs Ubuntu 12.04 should run fine. Though you can help test 4.4.2
 to 4.5.0 (use latest 4.5 branch) as well.

 I've spent last two weeks only on testing various components and upgrade
 scenarios but mostly with KVM, I think now the upgrade process is pretty
 smooth with fewer rough edges.

 On Wednesday 04 February 2015 05:58 PM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote:

 Hi there,

 We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have
 Ubuntu 12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04.

 Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to
 fix? Not being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool.

 Cheers,
 Wilder


 On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

  Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I
 was able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case).

 As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should
 be a supported platform for CS 4.5.

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

 Thanks, Rohit

 As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu
 12.04 (which is what I'm running).

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav
 rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:

 Hi Mike,

 I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage
 seems to work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things
 like migration, attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.

  On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
 
  Hi everyone,
 
  Any news on this?
 
  I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on
 KVM (with or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
 
  I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
 
  Thanks!
  Mike
 
  On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
 mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  Okay, thanks for the clarification.
 
  I will test it over the weekend.
 
  Cheers,
  Wilder
 
  On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav
 rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:
 
   Hi Wilder,
  
   If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which
 should become the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
 d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
  
   On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
 mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  
   Hi Rohit,
  
   Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
  
   Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used
 and I will test it.
  
   Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit
 away from the list. :)
  
   Cheers,
   Wilder
  
   On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav
 rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:
  
   Hi Wilder,
  
   Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were
 against latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your
 tests (on latest 4.5). Thanks.
  
   Regards.
  
   On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com
 mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  
   Hi all,
  
   Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it
 only after the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy
 with the redundant VPC work.
  
   Remarks:
  
   * I will test Basic Zone later today
   * For those willing to read, I added the whole events
 log after the tests results. :)
  
   There go my results:
  
   :: Environment ::
  
   Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone
 within our ACS Beta-Cloud infra
   Management Server: MacBook Pro
   Database: MySQL running locally on my

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-02-04 Thread Wilder Rodrigues

Hi there,

We are currently using 4.4.2 in our production environment and we have Ubuntu 
12.04-5 VMs. That would be crucial to have support to Ubuntu 12.04.

Is there any bug already created that we can have a look and help to fix? Not 
being able to upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5 wouldn’t be cool.

Cheers,
Wilder


On 02 Feb 2015, at 08:53, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.commailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was able 
to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case).

As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a 
supported platform for CS 4.5.

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.commailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Thanks, Rohit

As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04 (which 
is what I'm running).

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav 
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi Mike,

I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to work 
for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration, attaching/detach 
localstorage disks etc.

 On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.commailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 Any news on this?

 I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or 
 without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).

 I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.

 Thanks!
 Mike

 On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues 
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.commailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
 Okay, thanks for the clarification.

 I will test it over the weekend.

 Cheers,
 Wilder

 On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav 
 rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:

  Hi Wilder,
 
  If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the next 
  RC. At the moment the latest is SHA 
  d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
 
  On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
  wrodrig...@schubergphilis.commailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com 
  wrote:
 
  Hi Rohit,
 
  Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1: 
  8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
 
  Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will test 
  it.
 
  Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the list. 
  :)
 
  Cheers,
  Wilder
 
  On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav 
  rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
 
  Hi Wilder,
 
  Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against latest 
  4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest 4.5). 
  Thanks.
 
  Regards.
 
  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
  wrodrig...@schubergphilis.commailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com 
  wrote:
 
  Hi all,
 
  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the RC 
  has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work.
 
  Remarks:
 
  * I will test Basic Zone later today
  * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the 
  tests results. :)
 
  There go my results:
 
  :: Environment ::
 
  Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS 
  Beta-Cloud infra
  Management Server: MacBook Pro
  Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
 
 
  :: Advanced Zone ::
 
  ===
  Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName: 
  test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is 
  created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS 
  ===
  ok
  Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName: 
  test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName: 
  test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails | 
  Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test update domain admin details ... === TestName: 
  test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails | Status : 
  SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain | 
  Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName: 
  test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
 
  --
  Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
 
  OK
 
 
  Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName: 
  test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
 
  --
  Ran 1 test in 217.296s
 
  OK
 
 
  Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName: 
  test_advZoneVirtualRouter |

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-02-01 Thread Marcus

Just to add to the confusion, RHEL 6.3+ has had support for kvmclock,
even though it's version number is older, due to how they backport
things. It's a big mess. Ubuntu 12.04 is still behind on it though.
I'm remembering now that kvmclock was first merged for 4.1, then
backed out because of the Ubuntu 12.04 incompatibility. I think it was
around that time that the minimum versions were adopted, but it's not
until now in 4.5 that kvmclock is back and will require Ubuntu 12.04
users to either upgrade to a newer Ubuntu or run non-distro packages.
I'm game to back out kvmclock yet again, but I'd prefer to see us
update our recommended platforms.

Maybe we should ask people what they've been running. Is anyone still
testing against 12.04?

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
If it helps, I've actually just set this Ubuntu system up recently. It has
never been used with CloudStack before (and I haven't quite got it working
due to that exception when I try to run a VM).

Basically I was setting up a new KVM env so I could test this code:

https://reviews.apache.org/r/30239/

I was planning on pulling out the iSCSI storage adaptor and using your
dynamic-loading facility to make it integrate with the agent.

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that
feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING!

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Thanks, Marcus

Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how
they resolved the issue, though.

This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1):

cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version
QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice
Bellard

cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd
--version
libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's
a
thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to
target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were
changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and
Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing
functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos
that
most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit
trickier to
dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the
docs
on that.

At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in
place
for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix
was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like
our
XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen
any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch
updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a
minimum
version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros.
On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:

It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
libvirt).

I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin,
it
says I'm at the latest.

What am I missing there? :)

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock.
Please
see
the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:

http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com

wrote:

Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see
the
following:

2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN
[kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
'kvmclock'
at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
at

com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
at

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-02-01 Thread Marcus

Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that
feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING!

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
 Thanks, Marcus

 Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how
 they resolved the issue, though.

 This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1):

 cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version
 QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice
 Bellard

 cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd
 --version
 libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

 The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a
 thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to
 target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were
 changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and
 Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing
 functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that
 most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to
 dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs
 on that.

 At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place
 for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix
 was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our
 XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen
 any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch
 updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum
 version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros.
 On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

  It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
  libvirt).
 
  I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it
  says I'm at the latest.
 
  What am I missing there? :)
 
  On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please
  see
   the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:
  
  
  
 
 http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
   On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  
   wrote:
  
Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
following:
   
2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
   'kvmclock'
at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
at
   
   
  
 
 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
at
   
   
  
 
 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
at
   
   
  
 
 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
at
   
   
  
 
 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at
   
   
  
 
 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
   
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org
wrote:
   
 I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.


   
  
 
 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041


   
  
 
 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce

 ~Rajani

 On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

  I should point out that I'm on master.
 
  On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski 
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  wrote:
 
   Hi everyone,
  
   Any news on this?
  
   I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM
   (with
 or
   without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
  
   I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

If it helps, I've actually just set this Ubuntu system up recently. It has
never been used with CloudStack before (and I haven't quite got it working
due to that exception when I try to run a VM).

Basically I was setting up a new KVM env so I could test this code:

https://reviews.apache.org/r/30239/

I was planning on pulling out the iSCSI storage adaptor and using your
dynamic-loading facility to make it integrate with the agent.

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

 Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that
 feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING!

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
  Thanks, Marcus
 
  Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how
  they resolved the issue, though.
 
  This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1):
 
  cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version
  QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice
  Bellard
 
  cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd
  --version
  libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8
 
  On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's
 a
  thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to
  target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were
  changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and
  Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing
  functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos
 that
  most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit
 trickier to
  dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the
 docs
  on that.
 
  At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in
 place
  for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix
  was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like
 our
  XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen
  any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch
  updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a
 minimum
  version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros.
  On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  wrote:
 
   It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
   libvirt).
  
   I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin,
 it
   says I'm at the latest.
  
   What am I missing there? :)
  
   On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
  
That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock.
 Please
   see
the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:
   
   
   
  
 
 http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   
wrote:
   
 Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see
 the
 following:

 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
 (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
 b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
 b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN
 [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
 (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
 org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
'kvmclock'
 at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
 at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
 at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
 at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
 at


   
  
 
 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
 at


   
  
 
 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
 at


   
  
 
 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
 at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
 at
 com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
 at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
 at


   
  
 
 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
 at


   
  
 
 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
 at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)

 On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi 
 raj...@apache.org
 wrote:

  I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

I just happen to be using 12.04.1, but I'm personally fine with upgrading.

I know that upgrading is sometimes easier said than done in production
environments, though, so it would be interesting to get feedback from users
on this.

On Sunday, February 1, 2015, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just to add to the confusion, RHEL 6.3+ has had support for kvmclock,
 even though it's version number is older, due to how they backport
 things. It's a big mess. Ubuntu 12.04 is still behind on it though.
 I'm remembering now that kvmclock was first merged for 4.1, then
 backed out because of the Ubuntu 12.04 incompatibility. I think it was
 around that time that the minimum versions were adopted, but it's not
 until now in 4.5 that kvmclock is back and will require Ubuntu 12.04
 users to either upgrade to a newer Ubuntu or run non-distro packages.
 I'm game to back out kvmclock yet again, but I'd prefer to see us
 update our recommended platforms.

 Maybe we should ask people what they've been running. Is anyone still
 testing against 12.04?

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Mike Tutkowski
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
  If it helps, I've actually just set this Ubuntu system up recently. It
 has
  never been used with CloudStack before (and I haven't quite got it
 working
  due to that exception when I try to run a VM).
 
  Basically I was setting up a new KVM env so I could test this code:
 
  https://reviews.apache.org/r/30239/
 
  I was planning on pulling out the iSCSI storage adaptor and using your
  dynamic-loading facility to make it integrate with the agent.
 
  On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Looking at the code, it looks like this IS new for 4.5, I forget that
  feature merge for this release was LAST SPRING!
 
  On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
   Thanks, Marcus
  
   Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see
 how
   they resolved the issue, though.
  
   This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1):
  
   cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm
 --version
   QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008
 Fabrice
   Bellard
  
   cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd
   --version
   libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8
  
   On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
  
   The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS.
 There's
  a
   thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to
   target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were
   changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos
 and
   Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing
   functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos
  that
   most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit
  trickier to
   dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the
  docs
   on that.
  
   At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in
  place
   for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced
 fix
   was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like
  our
   XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have
 seen
   any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch
   updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a
  minimum
   version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros.
   On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   wrote:
  
It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
libvirt).
   
I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install
 libvirt-bin,
  it
says I'm at the latest.
   
What am I missing there? :)
   
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   
 That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock.
  Please
see
 the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:



   
  
 
 http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
 On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
   mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com

 wrote:

  Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still
 see
  the
  following:
 
  2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO
 [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
  (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
  b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
  b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
  2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN
  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
  (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
  org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
 'kvmclock'
  at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

Thanks, Rohit

As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04
(which is what I'm running).

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:

 Hi Mike,

 I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to
 work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration,
 attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.

  On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:
 
  Hi everyone,
 
  Any news on this?
 
  I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or
 without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
 
  I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
 
  Thanks!
  Mike
 
  On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues 
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  Okay, thanks for the clarification.
 
  I will test it over the weekend.
 
  Cheers,
  Wilder
 
  On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
 
   Hi Wilder,
  
   If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the
 next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
 d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
  
   On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  
   Hi Rohit,
  
   Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
  
   Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will
 test it.
  
   Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
 list. :)
  
   Cheers,
   Wilder
  
   On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:
  
   Hi Wilder,
  
   Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
 latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
 4.5). Thanks.
  
   Regards.
  
   On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  
   Hi all,
  
   Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after
 the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
 work.
  
   Remarks:
  
   * I will test Basic Zone later today
   * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the
 tests results. :)
  
   There go my results:
  
   :: Environment ::
  
   Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
 Beta-Cloud infra
   Management Server: MacBook Pro
   Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
  
  
   :: Advanced Zone ::
  
  
 ===
   Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
 test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
 created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
 test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName:
 test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test update domain admin details ... === TestName:
 test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName:
 test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
  
  
 --
   Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
  
   OK
  
  
   Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName:
 test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
  
  
 --
   Ran 1 test in 217.296s
  
   OK
  
  
   Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName:
 test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
 test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in
 the zone for migration
   Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
 test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

Also, just as an FYI, after I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 14.04, I was
able to create a VM using CS 4.6 (as we expected would be the case).

As Marcus mentioned, we should try to determine if Ubuntu 12.04 should be a
supported platform for CS 4.5.

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

 Thanks, Rohit

 As Marcus later commented, it's a compatibility issue with Ubuntu 12.04
 (which is what I'm running).

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:

 Hi Mike,

 I’ve tested 4.5 branch with KVM/Ubuntu 14.04 and local storage seems to
 work for me. I’ve not tested it thoroughly things like migration,
 attaching/detach localstorage disks etc.

  On 31-Jan-2015, at 1:10 pm, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
 
  Hi everyone,
 
  Any news on this?
 
  I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with
 or without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
 
  I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
 
  Thanks!
  Mike
 
  On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues 
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  Okay, thanks for the clarification.
 
  I will test it over the weekend.
 
  Cheers,
  Wilder
 
  On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:
 
   Hi Wilder,
  
   If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become
 the next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
 d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
  
   On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  
   Hi Rohit,
  
   Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
  
   Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will
 test it.
  
   Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
 list. :)
  
   Cheers,
   Wilder
  
   On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:
  
   Hi Wilder,
  
   Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
 latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
 4.5). Thanks.
  
   Regards.
  
   On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  
   Hi all,
  
   Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after
 the RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
 work.
  
   Remarks:
  
   * I will test Basic Zone later today
   * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after
 the tests results. :)
  
   There go my results:
  
   :: Environment ::
  
   Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
 Beta-Cloud infra
   Management Server: MacBook Pro
   Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
  
  
   :: Advanced Zone ::
  
  
 ===
   Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
 test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
 created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
 test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName:
 test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test update admin details ... === TestName:
 test_updateAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test update domain admin details ... === TestName:
 test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName:
 test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
  
  
 --
   Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
  
   OK
  
  
   Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName:
 test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
  
  
 --
   Ran 1 test in 217.296s
  
   OK
  
  
   Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName:
 test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
 test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm
 | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test recover Virtual

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-01-31 Thread Rajani Karuturi

I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce

~Rajani

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 I should point out that I'm on master.

 On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

  Hi everyone,
 
  Any news on this?
 
  I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or
  without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
 
  I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
 
  Thanks!
  Mike
 
  On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues 
  wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
 
  Okay, thanks for the clarification.
 
  I will test it over the weekend.
 
  Cheers,
  Wilder
 
  On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
 
   Hi Wilder,
  
   If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the
  next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
  d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
  
   On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
  wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  
   Hi Rohit,
  
   Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
  8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
  
   Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will
  test it.
  
   Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
  list. :)
  
   Cheers,
   Wilder
  
   On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
  wrote:
  
   Hi Wilder,
  
   Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
  latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
  4.5). Thanks.
  
   Regards.
  
   On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
  wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  
   Hi all,
  
   Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after
 the
  RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
 work.
  
   Remarks:
  
   * I will test Basic Zone later today
   * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the
  tests results. :)
  
   There go my results:
  
   :: Environment ::
  
   Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
  Beta-Cloud infra
   Management Server: MacBook Pro
   Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
  
  
   :: Advanced Zone ::
  
  
 
 ===
   Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
  test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
  created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS
 ===
   ok
   Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
  test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName:
  test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails
 |
  Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test update domain admin details ... === TestName:
  test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails |
  Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain |
  Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName:
  test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
  
  
 --
   Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
  
   OK
  
  
   Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName:
  test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
  
  
 --
   Ran 1 test in 217.296s
  
   OK
  
  
   Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName:
  test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm |
 Status
  : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
  test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status
  : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm |
  Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm |
  Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm |
  Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm |
  Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in
 the
  zone for migration
   Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
  test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

I should point out that I'm on master.

On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 Any news on this?

 I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or
 without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).

 I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.

 Thanks!
 Mike

 On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues 
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:

 Okay, thanks for the clarification.

 I will test it over the weekend.

 Cheers,
 Wilder

 On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:

  Hi Wilder,
 
  If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the
 next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
 d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
 
  On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
 
  Hi Rohit,
 
  Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
 
  Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will
 test it.
 
  Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
 list. :)
 
  Cheers,
  Wilder
 
  On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:
 
  Hi Wilder,
 
  Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
 latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
 4.5). Thanks.
 
  Regards.
 
  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
 
  Hi all,
 
  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after the
 RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC work.
 
  Remarks:
 
  * I will test Basic Zone later today
  * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the
 tests results. :)
 
  There go my results:
 
  :: Environment ::
 
  Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
 Beta-Cloud infra
  Management Server: MacBook Pro
  Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
 
 
  :: Advanced Zone ::
 
 
 ===
  Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
 test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
 created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
 test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName:
 test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test update domain admin details ... === TestName:
 test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName:
 test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
 
  --
  Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
 
  OK
 
 
  Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName:
 test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
 
  --
  Ran 1 test in 217.296s
 
  OK
 
 
  Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName:
 test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm | Status
 : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
 test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status
 : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_06_destroy_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test recover Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_07_restore_vm |
 Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test migrate VM ... SKIP: At least two hosts should be present in the
 zone for migration
  Test destroy(expunge) Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
 test_09_expunge_vm | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
 
  --
  Ran 10 tests in 816.707s
 
  OK (SKIP=1)
 
 
  test_privategw_acl
 (integration.acs.tests.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... ===
 TestName: test_privategw_acl | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
 
  --
  Ran 1 test in 85.883s
 
  OK
 
 
  Test to create service offering ... === TestName:
 test_01_create_service_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
  ok
  Test to update existing service offering ... ===

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-01-31 Thread Nux!

I was about to test 4.4 to 4.5 upgrade, but I'd rather have this kvmclock thing 
fixed.
When will the next RC be cut?

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
 From: Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org
 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
 Sent: Saturday, 31 January, 2015 13:57:33
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

 I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce
 
 ~Rajani
 
 On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
 
 I should point out that I'm on master.

 On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

  Hi everyone,
 
  Any news on this?
 
  I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with or
  without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
 
  I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
 
  Thanks!
  Mike
 
  On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues 
  wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
 
  Okay, thanks for the clarification.
 
  I will test it over the weekend.
 
  Cheers,
  Wilder
 
  On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
 
   Hi Wilder,
  
   If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become the
  next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
  d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
  
   On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
  wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  
   Hi Rohit,
  
   Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
  8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
  
   Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will
  test it.
  
   Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
  list. :)
  
   Cheers,
   Wilder
  
   On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
  wrote:
  
   Hi Wilder,
  
   Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
  latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
  4.5). Thanks.
  
   Regards.
  
   On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
  wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  
   Hi all,
  
   Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after
 the
  RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
 work.
  
   Remarks:
  
   * I will test Basic Zone later today
   * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after the
  tests results. :)
  
   There go my results:
  
   :: Environment ::
  
   Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
  Beta-Cloud infra
   Management Server: MacBook Pro
   Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
  
  
   :: Advanced Zone ::
  
  
 
 ===
   Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
  test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
  created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status : SUCCESS
 ===
   ok
   Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
  test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName:
  test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test update admin details ... === TestName: test_updateAdminDetails
 |
  Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test update domain admin details ... === TestName:
  test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails |
  Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test login API with domain ... === TestName: test_LoginApiDomain |
  Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test if Login API does not return UUID's ... === TestName:
  test_LoginApiUuidResponse | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
  
  
 --
   Ran 9 tests in 1094.799s
  
   OK
  
  
   Test reset virtual machine on reboot ... === TestName:
  test_01_reset_vm_on_reboot | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
  
  
 --
   Ran 1 test in 217.296s
  
   OK
  
  
   Test advanced zone virtual router ... === TestName:
  test_advZoneVirtualRouter | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_deploy_vm |
 Status
  : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Multiple Deploy Virtual Machine ... === TestName:
  test_deploy_vm_multiple | Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Stop Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_01_stop_vm | Status
  : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Start Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_02_start_vm |
  Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test Reboot Virtual Machine ... === TestName: test_03_reboot_vm |
  Status : SUCCESS ===
   ok
   Test destroy Virtual Machine ... === TestName

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-01-31 Thread David Nalley

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
 I was about to test 4.4 to 4.5 upgrade, but I'd rather have this kvmclock 
 thing fixed.
 When will the next RC be cut?

 Lucian


I've already cut RC2 that should include the kvmclock fixes.

--David

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

Actually, there are two sections in that doc that specify different Libvirt
versions (depending on what you need to do):

* 0.9.4
* 0.9.11 (maybe this version has to be compiled from source?)

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
 libvirt).

 I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it
 says I'm at the latest.

 What am I missing there? :)

 On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

 That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see
 the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:


 http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
 On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
 wrote:

  Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
  following:
 
  2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
  (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
  b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
  b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
  2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
  (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
  org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
 'kvmclock'
  at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
  at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
  at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
  at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
  at
 
 
 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
  at
 
 
 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
  at
 
 
 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
  at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
  at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
  at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
  at
 
 
 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
  at
 
 
 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
 
  On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org
  wrote:
 
   I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
  
  
 
 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
  
  
 
 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce
  
   ~Rajani
  
   On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
   mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
  
I should point out that I'm on master.
   
On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
   
 Hi everyone,

 Any news on this?

 I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM
 (with
   or
 without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).

 I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.

 Thanks!
 Mike

 On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues 
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:

 Okay, thanks for the clarification.

 I will test it over the weekend.

 Cheers,
 Wilder

 On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
   wrote:

  Hi Wilder,
 
  If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should
 become
   the
 next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
 d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
 
  On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
 
  Hi Rohit,
 
  Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
 8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
 
  Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I
  will
 test it.
 
  Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from
  the
 list. :)
 
  Cheers,
  Wilder
 
  On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav 
 rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:
 
  Hi Wilder,
 
  Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were
 against
 latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on
  latest
 4.5). Thanks.
 
  Regards.
 
  On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
 wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
 
  Hi all,
 
  Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only
  after
the
 RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant
 VPC
work.
 
  Remarks:
 
  * I will test Basic Zone later today
  * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log
 after
   the
 tests results. :)
 
  There go my results:
 
  :: Environment ::

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

Thanks, Marcus

Yeah, I'm looking through some of those old threads now. I don't see how
they resolved the issue, though.

This is what I see version wise (on Ubuntu 12.04.1):

cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo kvm --version
QEMU emulator version 1.0 (qemu-kvm-1.0), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice
Bellard

cloudstack@cloudstack-kvm1:/var/log/cloudstack/agent$ sudo libvirtd
--version
libvirtd (libvirt) 0.9.8

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a
thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to
target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were
changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and
Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing
functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that
most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to
dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs
on that.

At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place
for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix
was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our
XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen
any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch
updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum
version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros.
On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:

It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
libvirt).

I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it
says I'm at the latest.

What am I missing there? :)

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please
see
the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:

http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com

wrote:

Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
following:

2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
'kvmclock'
at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
at

com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
at

com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
at

com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
at

java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at

java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org
wrote:

I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.

https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041

https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce

~Rajani

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

I should point out that I'm on master.

On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:

Hi everyone,

Any news on this?

I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM
(with
or
without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).

I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.

Thanks!
Mike

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:

Okay, thanks for the clarification.

I will test

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

I am able to manually create a VM on KVM using an ISO. I just can't create
a VM via CloudStack due to that exception.

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

 Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
 following:

 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
 (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
 b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
 b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
 (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
 org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock'
 at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
 at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
 at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
 at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
 at
 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
 at
 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
 at
 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
 at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
 at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
 at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
 at
 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
 at
 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
 at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)

 On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org
 wrote:

 I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.

 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041

 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce

 ~Rajani

 On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

  I should point out that I'm on master.
 
  On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski 
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  wrote:
 
   Hi everyone,
  
   Any news on this?
  
   I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with
 or
   without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
  
   I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
  
   Thanks!
   Mike
  
   On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues 
   wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  
   Okay, thanks for the clarification.
  
   I will test it over the weekend.
  
   Cheers,
   Wilder
  
   On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:
  
Hi Wilder,
   
If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become
 the
   next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
   d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
   
On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
   wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
   
Hi Rohit,
   
Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
   8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
   
Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I
 will
   test it.
   
Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
   list. :)
   
Cheers,
Wilder
   
On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
   wrote:
   
Hi Wilder,
   
Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
   latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
   4.5). Thanks.
   
Regards.
   
On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
   wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
   
Hi all,
   
Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after
  the
   RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
  work.
   
Remarks:
   
* I will test Basic Zone later today
* For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after
 the
   tests results. :)
   
There go my results:
   
:: Environment ::
   
Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
   Beta-Cloud infra
Management Server: MacBook Pro
Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
   
   
:: Advanced Zone ::
   
   
  
 
 ===
Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
   test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
   created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status :
 SUCCESS
  ===
ok
Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
   test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName:
   test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test update admin details ... === TestName:
 test_updateAdminDetails
  |
   Status : SUCCESS ===

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-01-31 Thread Marcus

The minimum versions aren't always what is shipped with the OS. There's a
thread from awhile back about this, and about how difficult it was to
target the disparate shipping versions with how quickly things were
changing. There were some basic incompatibilities between the centos and
Ubuntu versions, and on top of that there were issues around missing
functionality. Ubuntu is easy if I recall, as there are special repos that
most Ubuntu virt users leverage anyway. With centos it is a bit trickier to
dig up the minimum requirements. I'd like to see more guidance in the docs
on that.

At any rate, none of this should be new to 4.5, kvmclock has been in place
for longer than that. The previous issue with 4.5 and the referenced fix
was that a recent libvirt version added XML checking that didn't like our
XML. So if you were running 0.9.11 through 1.2.? you would not have seen
any problem, but anything newer would fail the validation. The patch
updates the XML. These are the same sort of problems that led to a minimum
version, rather than working out the idiosyncrasies between distros.
On Jan 31, 2015 11:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:

It looks like our 4.4 docs say we should be at 0.9.11 or later (of
libvirt).

I see I'm at 0.9.8, but when I run sudo apt-get install libvirt-bin, it
says I'm at the latest.

What am I missing there? :)

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:

That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please
see
the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:

http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com

wrote:

Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
following:

2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name
'kvmclock'
at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
at

com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
at

com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
at

java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at

java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org
wrote:

I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.

https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041

https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce

~Rajani

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

I should point out that I'm on master.

On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:

Hi everyone,

Any news on this?

I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM
(with
or
without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).

I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.

Thanks!
Mike

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:

Okay, thanks for the clarification.

I will test it over the weekend.

Cheers,
Wilder

On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com

wrote:

Hi Wilder,

If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should
become
the
next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.

On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:

Hi Rohit,

Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740

Please let me know if

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
following:

2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock'
at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
at
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:

 I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.

 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041

 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce

 ~Rajani

 On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
 mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:

  I should point out that I'm on master.
 
  On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski 
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
  wrote:
 
   Hi everyone,
  
   Any news on this?
  
   I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with
 or
   without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
  
   I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
  
   Thanks!
   Mike
  
   On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues 
   wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
  
   Okay, thanks for the clarification.
  
   I will test it over the weekend.
  
   Cheers,
   Wilder
  
   On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
 wrote:
  
Hi Wilder,
   
If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become
 the
   next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
   d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.
   
On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
   wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
   
Hi Rohit,
   
Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
   8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740
   
Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I will
   test it.
   
Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from the
   list. :)
   
Cheers,
Wilder
   
On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
   wrote:
   
Hi Wilder,
   
Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
   latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on latest
   4.5). Thanks.
   
Regards.
   
On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
   wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
   
Hi all,
   
Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only after
  the
   RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
  work.
   
Remarks:
   
* I will test Basic Zone later today
* For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after
 the
   tests results. :)
   
There go my results:
   
:: Environment ::
   
Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
   Beta-Cloud infra
Management Server: MacBook Pro
Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro
   
   
:: Advanced Zone ::
   
   
  
 
 ===
Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
   test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone is
   created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status :
 SUCCESS
  ===
ok
Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
   test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test delete domain with force option ... === TestName:
   test_forceDeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test update admin details ... === TestName:
 test_updateAdminDetails
  |
   Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test update domain admin details ... === TestName:
   test_updateDomainAdminDetails | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test user update API ... === TestName: test_updateUserDetails |
   Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1

2015-01-31 Thread Marcus

That's a different error. It says you don't even have kvmclock. Please see
the minimum libvirt/qemu versions required since ACS 4.0:

http://cloudstack-installation.readthedocs.org/en/4.3/hypervisor_installation.html
On Jan 31, 2015 10:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:

 Interesting...I should be a week past that commit, but still see the
 following:

 2015-01-31 00:35:50,403 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
 (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) Attempting to create volume
 b4cd55ca-1df0-4bfb-a2b2-0bf3d582 (Filesystem) in pool
 b9bd94e9-b55a-43a6-b4db-56f24ebf135a with size 1073741824
 2015-01-31 00:35:50,633 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
 (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) LibvirtException
 org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unknown timer name 'kvmclock'
 at org.libvirt.ErrorHandler.processError(Unknown Source)
 at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
 at org.libvirt.Connect.processError(Unknown Source)
 at org.libvirt.Connect.domainCreateXML(Unknown Source)
 at

 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.startVM(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1257)
 at

 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.execute(LibvirtComputingResource.java:3811)
 at

 com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource.executeRequest(LibvirtComputingResource.java:1351)
 at com.cloud.agent.Agent.processRequest(Agent.java:503)
 at com.cloud.agent.Agent$AgentRequestHandler.doTask(Agent.java:808)
 at com.cloud.utils.nio.Task.run(Task.java:84)
 at

 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
 at

 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
 at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)

 On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org
 wrote:

  I think the below commits from marcus addresses them.
 
 
 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=35ede041
 
 
 https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=455998ce
 
  ~Rajani
 
  On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski 
  mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
 
   I should point out that I'm on master.
  
   On Saturday, January 31, 2015, Mike Tutkowski 
   mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
   wrote:
  
Hi everyone,
   
Any news on this?
   
I am still having trouble creating a VM on local storage on KVM (with
  or
without kvmclock.disable=true in agent.properties).
   
I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.1.
   
Thanks!
Mike
   
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Wilder Rodrigues 
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
   
Okay, thanks for the clarification.
   
I will test it over the weekend.
   
Cheers,
Wilder
   
On 22 Jan 2015, at 15:20, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
  wrote:
   
 Hi Wilder,

 If you’re testing please use latest 4.5 branch which should become
  the
next RC. At the moment the latest is SHA
d08369ad06b6d5ef801f79493c2aa4bdaeab1b83. Thanks.

 On 22-Jan-2015, at 6:29 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:

 Hi Rohit,

 Tests were based on the commit id gave put in the RC1:
8db3cbd4ff62b17a8b496026b68cf60ee0c76740

 Please let me know if there is a new commit ID to be used and I
 will
test it.

 Apologies for the misunderstanding, I have been a bit away from
 the
list. :)

 Cheers,
 Wilder

 On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:29, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:

 Hi Wilder,

 Thanks for sharing, but I’m confused if these tests were against
latest 4.5 branch or the RC1? Looking forward to your tests (on
 latest
4.5). Thanks.

 Regards.

 On 22-Jan-2015, at 4:24 pm, Wilder Rodrigues 
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 Sorry for the delay on the tests and also coming to it only
 after
   the
RC has been cancelled, but I was way too busy with the redundant VPC
   work.

 Remarks:

 * I will test Basic Zone later today
 * For those willing to read, I added the whole events log after
  the
tests results. :)

 There go my results:

 :: Environment ::

 Host: XenServer 6.2 - running under a VMware zone within our ACS
Beta-Cloud infra
 Management Server: MacBook Pro
 Database: MySQL running locally on my MacBook Pro


 :: Advanced Zone ::


   
  
 
 ===
 Test Create Account and user for that account ... === TestName:
test_01_create_account | Status : SUCCESS ===
 ok
 Test Sub domain allowed to launch VM  when a Domain level zone
 is
created ... === TestName: test_01_add_vm_to_subdomain | Status :
  SUCCESS
   ===
 ok
 Test delete domain without force option ... === TestName:
test_DeleteDomain | Status : SUCCESS ===

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC1